Radical vulvectomy with postoperative irradiation for vulvar cancer: therapeutic implications of a central block

Multidisciplinary personalized approach in the management of vulvar cancer - the Vul.Can Team experience

INTRODUCTION

Multidisciplinary treatment strategy involving adjuvant radiotherapy for advanced vulvar cancer could be useful in offering the best personalized clinical approach. In 2013, the VULvar CANcer Multi-Disciplinary Team (Vul.Can MDT) was set up in our institution, in order to share knowledge and expertise, high-quality diagnosis, and evidence-based decision making in the context of personalized medicine. The aim of this observational study was to report on our series of vulvar cancer patients managed postoperatively with radiotherapy within the framework of a formal multidisciplinary tumor board.

METHODS

Coupling surgical and oncological international guidelines with "case-by-case" discussions, a multi-specialist consensus was progressively reached and internal recommendations were developed and introduced in the daily routine. Data from vulvar cancer patients who underwent primary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy throughout a 5-year period were retrospectively collected. Actuarial local control was the primary endpoint, while secondary end-points were acute and late toxicities, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Toxicity was evaluated according to the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Event v 4.0 scale.

RESULTS

The analysis included 35 patients with squamous vulvar cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy±chemotherapy, from April 2013 to September 2017. Median age was 70 years (range 18-87), all patients underwent surgery followed by concomitant chemoradiation (45.7%) or radiotherapy alone (54.3%). The median prophylactic dose on lymphatic drainage was 45 Gy, while positive nodes and perineal area received 51.2 Gy and 52.6 Gy, respectively. Chemotherapy involved the cisplatin-based regimen (45.7%)±5-fluorouracil (37.1%). Median follow-up was 32 months (range 6-72): the 24-months local control, disease-free survival, and actuarial overall survival rates were 88.6%, 82.0%, and 91.0%, respectively. Low rates of severe acute (12%) and late (3%) toxicities occurred.

DISCUSSION

The outcomes of this series support the benefit of a multidisciplinary personalized approach in the management of vulvar cancer.

Intensity modulated radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: Treatment technique and outcomes

Objective

The objective of this study was to present the treatment technique and evaluate clinical outcomes after intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for vulvar cancer.

Methods and materials

This retrospective study included 39 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated with IMRT from 2005 to 2015. There were 21 patients treated with postoperative IMRT, 13 with definitive IMRT, and 5 with preoperative IMRT. Tumor staging was Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I in 6, stage II in 7, stage III in 19, and stage IV in 7 patients. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered to 14 patients. Brachytherapy was delivered in 8 patients.

Results

The median follow-up was 34 months (range, 3.3-71). Median IMRT dose to patients receiving pre- or postoperative IMRT was 5040 cGy (range, 5040-6080). Median combined IMRT and brachytherapy dose to gross tumor was 7000 cGy (range, 5040-7520) in those treated with definitive RT. The 3-year locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival for those receiving postoperative RT were 89% and 67%, respectively. The 3-year LRC and overall survival for those receiving definitive IMRT were 42% and 49%, respectively. In patients receiving definitive or neoadjuvant IMRT, 69% had complete clinical response and 44% had complete pathologic response. The actuarial 3-year inguinal recurrence rate was 7%. There were no acute grade 3-4 hematological, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary toxicities. There were no late grade 3-4 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities.

Conclusions

IMRT for vulvar cancer is associated with high rates of LRC in the postoperative setting and limited radiation-related toxicity. Durable LRC of disease after definitive IMRT remains challenging, and several refinements to our treatment technique are suggested.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of vulvar carcinoma: A comparative dosimetric study with early clinical outcome

OBJECTIVES

To assess early clinical outcome of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of vulvar cancer and compare dosimetric parameters with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT).

METHODS

Fifteen patients with vulvar cancer were treated with IMRT. Seven patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation, and 8 patients were treated with adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy. Median dose was 46 Gy in the preoperative and 50.4 Gy in the postoperative group.

RESULTS

The mean volume of small bowel, rectum, and bladder that received doses in excess of 30 Gy with IMRT was reduced when compared with 3D CRT. Treatment was well tolerated, and only 1 patient had acute Grade 3 small-bowel toxicity. Median follow-up was 12 months. In the preoperative group, 5 patients (71%) had clinical complete response and 3 patients (42.8%) had pathologic complete response. In the adjuvant group, 2 patients had recurrences in the treatment field. No patients had late Grade 3 toxicity. The 2-year actuarial disease-specific survival was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated RT appears to offer advantages over 3D CRT treatment of vulvar cancer by elimination of dose modulation across overlapping regions and reduction of unnecessary dose to the bladder, rectum, and small bowel. Early results with a small number of patients show promising results, with a low incidence of severe toxicity.

Irradiating the groin nodes without breaking a leg: A comparison of techniques for groin node irradiation

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal technique for delivering postoperative radiotherapy for vulvar cancer and other tumors requiring treatment of the inguinal nodes. This project compared tumor coverage and normal tissue sparing for the 5 main radiotherapy techniques that are used to treat vulvar cancer. The intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan was undesirable because it resulted in an excessive dose to portions of the central pelvic structures. The photon thunderbird with skin match was unacceptable because it underdosed a portion of the groin region. The electron thunderbird was ideal for thin patients but was not applicable for most patients because of excessive dose to the skin and subcutaneous tissues. The photon through-and-through and the photon thunderbird with deep match were acceptable in most situations. In thin patients, where the depth of the inguinal vessels is less than 3 cm, the electron thunderbird is the technique of choice. In the average-sized patient, both the photon through-and-through and the photon thunderbird with deep match are reasonable options. The available literature suggests that the risk of femoral neck fracture or necrosis of the femoral head is approximately 11% at 5 years using the photon through-and-through technique. In our opinion, this is an acceptable price to pay for reliable node coverage, setup simplicity, and zero risk of overdose at field junctions.

Irradiation of the inguinal lymph nodes in patients of differing body habitus: A comparison of techniques and resulting normal tissue complication probabilities

The treatment of the inguinal lymph nodes with radiotherapy is strongly influenced by the body habitus of the patient. The effect of 7 radiotherapy techniques on femoral head doses was studied. Three female patients of differing body habitus (ectomorph, mesomorph, endomorph) were selected. Radiation fields included the pelvis and contiguous inguinal regions and were representative of fields used in the treatment of cancers of the lower pelvis. Seven treatment techniques were compared. In the ectomorph and mesomorph, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the femoral heads was lowest with use of anteroposterior (AP) and modified posteroanterior (PA) field with inguinal electron field supplements (technique 1). In the endomorph, NTCP was lowest with use of AP and modified PA field without electron field supplements (technique 2) or a 4-field approach (technique 6). Technique 1 for ectomorphs and mesomorphs and techniques 2 and 6 for endomorphs were optimal techniques for providing relatively homogeneous dose distributions within the target area while minimizing the dose to the femoral heads.

Carcinoma of the vulva: Combined modality treatment

One of the most significant developments in recent decades in the management of malignant diseases is the recognition that surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy have limited curative potential. Along with this recognition has come the realization that although some patients can be cured with one of these modalities alone, the judicious combination of these modalities can result in better outcome. Carcinoma of the vulva, a disease that presents challenges with its management because of its anatomic location, affinity for spread to the lymph nodes, and incidence in elderly patients, lends itself to the use of this multimodality approach. The specific purpose of this approach is to decrease the sequelae of radical surgery. In addition, patients that could not be considered candidates for any treatment, such as patients with unresectable nodes, can be offered therapy with potential of cure. The patients with moderately or very advanced disease should be considered for the combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. This combined therapy results in better outcome with lesser morbidity. The studies that have been carried out in recent years for patients with advanced carcinoma of the vulva have helped to establish treatment guidelines that can be followed with confidence until more information becomes available.

Radiation treatment related factors influencing outcome in vulvar cancer patients

The objective of this research is to identify the impact of radiation treatment factors on survival in vulvar cancer patients. We performed a follow-up study on 60 women with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva treated at the Department of Radiotherapy of the University of Ulm from 1980 to 1997. The follow-up time ranged from 0.5 to 17 years (mean 6.5 years). The irradiated volume included vulva and regional lymph nodes. The influence of treatment factors (tumor resection versus no tumor resection, treatment time, dose) on overall and disease-free survival was examined. In addition, applied doses were corrected for treatment time using the extended alpha/beta-model for calculating the biologically effective doses. The applied dose was 48.1 +/- 13.2 Gy (median: 50 Gy). Treatment time was 40.4 +/- 19.4 days (median: 38 days). 34/60 patients underwent surgery with complete resection of macroscopic tumor. 26 of 60 patients were resected incompletely or only a biopsy was taken. In univariate analysis prognostic factors influencing overall and disease-free survival were, along with T- and N-stage, treatment time, and biologically effective dose. In multivariate analysis, biologically effective dose was the only significant factor. We conclude that biologically effective dose and treatment time are important treatment factors influencing overall and disease-free survival vulvar cancer patients.

Irradiation in carcinoma of the vulva: factors affecting outcome

PURPOSE

This report reviews the increasing role of radiation therapy in the management of patients with histologically confirmed vulvar carcinoma, based on a retrospective analysis of 68 patients with primary disease (2 in situ and 66 invasive) and 18 patients with recurrent tumor treated with irradiation alone or combined with surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of the patients with primary tumors, 14 were treated with wide local excision plus irradiation, 19 received irradiation alone after biopsy, 24 were treated with radical vulvectomy followed by irradiation to the operative fields and inguinal-femoral/pelvic lymph nodes, and 11 received postoperative irradiation after partial or simple vulvectomy. The 18 patients with recurrent tumors were treated with irradiation alone. Indications and techniques of irradiation are discussed in detail.

RESULTS

In patients treated with biopsy/local excision and irradiation, local tumor control was 92% to 100% in Stages T1-3N0, 40% in similar stages with N1-3, and 27% in recurrent tumors. In patients treated with partial/radical vulvectomy and irradiation, primary tumor control was 90% in patients with T1-3 tumors and any nodal stage, 33% in patients with any T stage and N3 lymph nodes, and 66% with recurrent tumors. The actuarial 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87% for T1N0, 62% for T2-3N0, 30% for T1-3N1 disease, and 11 % for patients with recurrent tumors; there were no long-term survivors with T4 or N2-3 tumors. Four of 18 patients (22%) treated for postvulvectomy recurrent disease remain disease-free after local tumor excision and irradiation. In patients with T1-2 tumors treated with biopsy/wide tumor excision and irradiation with doses under 50 Gy, local tumor control was 75% (3 of 4), in contrast to 100% (13 of 13) with 50.1 to 65 Gy. In patients with T3-4 tumors treated with local wide excision and irradiation, tumor control was 0% with doses below 50 Gy (3 patients) and 63% (7 of 11) with 50.1 to 65 Gy. In patients with T1-2 tumors treated with partial/radical vulvectomy and irradiation, local tumor control was 83% (14 of 17), regardless of dose level, and in T3-4 tumors, it was 62% (5 of 8) with 50 to 60 Gy and 80% (8 of 10) with doses higher than 60 Gy. The differences are not statistically significant. There was no significant dose response for tumor control in the inguinal-femoral lymph nodes; doses of 50 Gy were adequate for elective treatment of nonpalpable lymph nodes, and 60 to 70 Gy controlled tumor growth in 75% to 80% of patients with N2-3 nodes when administered postoperatively after partial or radical lymph node dissection. Significant treatment morbidity included one rectovaginal fistula, one case of proctitis, one rectal stricture, four bone/skin necroses, four vaginal necroses, and one groin abscess.

CONCLUSIONS

Irradiation is playing a greater role in the management of patients with carcinoma of the vulva; combined with wide local tumor excision or used alone in T1-2 tumors, it is an alternative treatment to radical vulvectomy, with significantly less morbidity. Postradical vulvectomy irradiation in locally advanced tumors improves tumor control at the primary site and the regional lymphatics in comparison with reports of surgery alone.

Adjuvant radiation for vulvar carcinoma: improved local control

PURPOSE

Local recurrence is a significant problem following primary surgery for advanced vulva carcinoma. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of adjuvant vulvar radiation on local control in high risk patients and the impact of local recurrence on overall survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1980-1994, 62 patients with invasive vulva carcinoma and either positive or close (less 8 mm) margins of excision were retrospectively studied. Thirty-one patients were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy to the vulva and 31 patients were observed after surgery. Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional hazard regression model were used to evaluate the effect of adjuvant radiation therapy on local recurrence and overall survival. Independent prognostic factors for local recurrence and survival were also assessed.

RESULTS

Local recurrence occurred in 58% of observed patients and 16% in patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy significantly reduced local recurrence rates in both the close margin and positive margin groups (p = 0.036, p = 0.0048). On both univariate and multivariate analysis adjuvant radiation and margins of excision were significant prognostic predictors for local control. Significant determinants of actuarial survival included International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage, percentage of pathologically positive inguinal nodes and margins of excision. The positive margin observed group had a significantly poorer actuarial 5 year survival than the other groups (p = 0.0016) and adjuvant radiation significantly improved survival for this group. The 2 year actuarial survival after developing local recurrence was 25%. Local recurrence was a significant predictor for death from vulva carcinoma (risk ratio 3.54).

CONCLUSION

Local recurrence is a common occurrence in high risk patients. In this study adjuvant radiation therapy significantly reduced local recurrence rates and may improve overall survival in certain subgroups. As salvage rates after developing local recurrence are poor adjuvant vulvar radiation should be considered for patients at risk after primary surgery.

Sites of failure and times to failure in carcinoma of the vulva treated conservatively: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to examine the patterns of failure after conservative therapy for vulvar carcinoma to establish a basis for the design of prospective cooperative trials in this disease.

STUDY DESIGN

The records and characteristics of all patients in whom cancer recurred after conservative therapy in two prospective clinical trials were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 143 patients who received one or more modifications of therapy, 37 patients had recurrence of cancer and 20 died of the disease. The median intervals to recurrence were 35.9 months for vulvar cancer and 7.0 months for groin cancer (p = 0.0002). There were 12 groin recurrences; 11 (91.7%) of these patients have died of the disease. The median survival time after recurrence was 52.4 months for patients with vulvar cancer and 9.4 months for those with groin cancer (p = 0.0025).

CONCLUSIONS

Groin cancer recurs earlier than vulvar cancer among patients treated conservatively. Future trials that evaluate modified therapy to the groin need to include early interim analyses. Follow-up for > 36 months after study entry may not be necessary to evaluate the impact of new treatments.