Preoperative chemoradiation for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and duodenum

Rare case of small intestine bleeding

We present a case of a healthy 59-year-old woman who presented for a capsule endoscopy to evaluate melaena and iron deficiency anaemia. She had previously underwent an oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy at an outside institution which were unremarkable. Capsule endoscopy showed an ulcerated, bleeding lesion likely in the duodenum. Differential diagnosis included adenocarcinoma, carcinoid tumour, lymphoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumour and metastatic disease. A push enteroscopy was performed after which showed an ulcerated mass in the third portion of the duodenum. Biopsies confirmed adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography of the abdomen showed no signs of distant metastasis and the patient was referred to surgery for evaluation. The patient underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy, with resection of the mass and negative lymph nodes in all nine that were removed (T3N0). The patient was classified as stage II duodenal adenocarcinoma. Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a rare but clinically significant cause of small bowel bleeding.

Can we downstage locally advanced pancreatic cancer to resectable? A phase I/II study of induction oxaliplatin and 5-FU chemoradiation

BACKGROUND

Half of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) present with regionally advanced disease. This includes borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable tumors as defined by current NCCN guidelines for resectability. Chemoradiation (CH-RT) is used in this setting in attempt to control local disease, and possibly downstage to resectable disease. We report a phase I/II trial of a combination of 5FU/Oxaliplatin with concurrent radiation in patients presenting with borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven borderline resectable or locally advanced unresectable PC were eligible. Chemotherapy included continuous infusion 5FU (200 mg/m2) daily and oxaliplatin weekly for 5 weeks in dose escalation cohorts, ranging from 30 to 60 mg/m2. Concurrent radiation therapy consisted of 4,500 cGy in 25 fractions (180 cGy/fx/d) followed by a comedown to the tumor and margins for an additional 540 cGy ×3 (total dose 5,040 cGy in 28 fractions). Following completion of CH-RT, patients deemed resectable underwent surgery; those who remained unresectable for cure but did not progress (SD, stable disease) received mFOLFOX6 ×6 cycles. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. End-points of the phase II portion were resectability and overall survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 24 subjects (15 men and 9 women, mean age 64.5 years) were enrolled between June 2004 and December 2009 and received CH-RT. Seventeen patients were enrolled in the Phase I component of the study, fifteen of whom completed neoadjuvant therapy. Reasons for not completing treatment included grade 3 toxicities (1 patient) and withdrawal of consent (1 patient). The highest dose of oxaliplatin (60 mg/m2) was well tolerated and it was used as the recommended phase II dose. An additional 7 patients were treated in the phase II portion, 5 of whom completed CH-RT; the remaining 2 patients did not complete treatment because of grade 3 toxicities. Overall, 4/24 did not complete CH-RT. Grade 4 toxicities related to initial CH-RT were observed during phase I (n=2, pulmonary embolism and lymphopenia) and phase II (n=3, fatigue, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia). Following restaging after completion of CH-RT, 4 patients had progressed (PD); 9 patients had SD and received additional chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 (one of them had a dramatic response after two cycles and underwent curative resection); the remaining 7 patients (29.2%) were noted to have a response and were explored: 2 had PD, 4 had SD, still unresectable, and 1 patient was resected for cure with negative margins. Overall 2 patients (8.3%) in the study received curative resection following neoadjuvant therapy. Median overall survival for the entire study population was 11.4 months. Overall survival for the two resected patients was 41.7 and 21.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined modality treatment for borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer with oxaliplatin, 5FU and radiation was reasonably well tolerated. The majority of patients remained unresectable. Survival data with this regimen were comparable to others for locally advanced pancreas cancer, suggesting the need for more novel approaches.

Complete Response after Chemoradiation in Ampullary Carcinoma: A Case Report

Aims and Background

The case of a 70-year-old patient with resectable, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is presented.

Patient and Methods

Due to intraoperative hemorrhagic complications, surgical resection was not feasible. The patient was treated with radiochemotherapy consisting of external beam radiotherapy (50.4 Gy; 1.8 Gy/fraction; 5 fractions/week) plus 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous IV infusion, days 2–5, week 1 and 5 of radiotherapy) and mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 IV, day 2, week 1 of radiotherapy).

Results

At five years’ follow-up the patient was in good general condition, without any signs of disease according to CT scan, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and tumor marker determination. Multiple random biopsies performed in the ampullary region were negative for tumor growth.

Conclusions

In patients with ampullary carcinoma the use of concurrent chemoradiation should be considered, particularly when surgical resection is unfeasible due to medical contraindications or locally advanced disease.

Concomitant Radiotherapy with Protracted 5-fluorouracil Infusion in Locally Advanced Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Phase Ii Study

Aims and Background

To evaluate the efficacy of combined radiation therapy and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the pancreas.

Methods

Between January 1992 and June 1999, 31 patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated in our Institute. In 20 patients, the tumor (65%) was located in the head of the pancreas and in 11 (35%) in the body or tail; 13 cases also showed involved nodes. Radiation therapy consisted in a median dose of 63 Gy in 33-36 fractions applied to the tumor and regional lymph nodes. Chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion, 250 mg/m2 daily, was administered in the first and fifth week of the radiation therapy. Thereafter, 22 patients received 3-10 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with same doses. Median follow-up of the series was 20 months. The toxicity of the treatment was scored according to WHO criteria. All patients underwent nutritional assessment at the time of radiochemotherapy.

Results

The median overall survival was 15.2 months (range, 4-42). At restaging, 17 cases (55%) showed no change and 14 (45%) a partial remission. At the end of radiochemotherapy in 8 (26%) of the cases there was indication for pancreatectomy, which was executed in 4 patients. At the time of the study, 2 patients (6.4%) were surgically proven disease free. Eleven of the 13 cases (85%) presenting involved nodes showed that the enlarged lymph nodes had disappeared. Nineteen patients (61%) are alive with clinical evidence of disease and 2 cases are alive with liver metastases; 8 patients (26%) died for disease. In 74% of cases there was complete pain control. Tolerance to the regimen was good. Nutritional assistance was evaluated and was found to be correlated to survival.

Conclusions

The results of the series confirm a good tolerance with low acute toxicity. Tumor down-staging and resectability rates were high, together with prolonged survival and a good quality of life.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced duodenal adenocarcinoma

Duodenal adenocarcinoma (ADC) represents only 0.3% of gastrointestinal neoplasms. With the frequency being higher between the ages of 40 and 60, it is predominantly located in the second part of the duodenum and around the periampullary region. Symptoms are nonspecific, so the majority of patients present with advanced disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a therapeutic option that has not been well studied. The global literature includes only isolated reports on this subject. This is why we are presenting the following case: a 60-year-old female patient with a locally advanced, inoperable duodenal ADC received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Having presented a favourable response as observed in the post-neoadjuvant extension studies, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed without any perioperative complications and with satisfactory progress. The final biopsy reported a complete pathological response. After being monitored for 34 months, the patient was free from locoregional and distant metastatic disease. During the last weeks of monitoring, she developed a second primary breast tumour, which has been corroborated by immunohistochemistry.

Preoperative Chemoradiation and Intra-Operative Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Carcinoma

Aims and background

In recent years, preoperative chemoradiation has received growing interest for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In an attempt to improve resectability and disease control, we used preoperative radiation therapy and concomitant 5-fluorouracil in a combined modality therapy protocol. The aim of the study was to evaluate definitive results in terms of toxicity, response and clinical outcome.

Material and methods

Twenty-eight patients with unresectable (cT4,19 patients) or resectable (cT3, 9 patients) nonmetastatic pancreatic tumors received radiotherapy (39.6 Gy) plus 5-fluorouracil (continuous infusion, days 1-4 at 1000 mg/m2/day). After 4 weeks, patients were evaluated for surgical resection. In 9 resected patients, electron-beam intra-operative radiotherapy (10 Gy) was given before reconstruction. Thereafter, in resected patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed.

Results

During chemoradiation, 1 patient (3.6%) developed grade 3 acute gastrointestinal toxicity and 2 patients (7.1%) developed grade 3 hematological toxicity. Three of 19 patients with unresectable tumors had tumor downstaging (15.8%). Two patients showed partial response (response rate, 7.1%; 95% CI, 0.2-25.3) and 4 patients (14.3%) had minimal tumor response. Four patients (14.3%) showed progressive disease after chemoradiation. One postoperative death was recorded. The median survival time was 11.3 months (20.5 and 9.0 months in resected and unresected patients, respectively). Only one local failure was recorded in 8 patients resected with negative margins.

Conclusions

Although the response rate is still low, our preliminary results suggest that preoperative 5-fluorouracil chemoradiation is well tolerated and may result in tumor downstaging. Delivery of intra-operative radiotherapy seems to be associated with a low rate of local recurrences.

Long-term analysis of 2 prospective studies that incorporate mitomycin C into an adjuvant chemoradiation regimen for pancreatic and periampullary cancers

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report toxicity and long-term survival outcomes of 2 prospective trials evaluating mitomycin C (MMC) with 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemoradiation in resected periampullary adenocarcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1996 to 2002, 119 patients received an adjuvant 4-drug chemotherapy regimen of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, MMC, and dipyridamole with chemoradiation on 2 consecutive trials (trials A and B). Trial A patients received upfront chemoradiation (50 Gy split-course, 2.5 Gy/fraction) followed by 4 cycles of the 4-drug chemotherapy with bolus 5-fluorouracil. Trial B patients received 1 cycle of the 4-drug chemotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil followed by continuous chemoradiation (45-54 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fraction) and 2 additional cycles of chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 62 trial A patients, 61% had pancreatic and 39% nonpancreatic periampullary carcinomas. Trial B (n = 57) consisted of 68% pancreatic and 32% nonpancreatic periampullary carcinomas. Resection margin and lymph node status were similar for both trials. Median follow-up was longer for trial A than trial B (197.5 vs 107.0 months), with median OS of 32.2 and 24.2 months, respectively. Rates of 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 48%, 31%, and 26% in trial A and 32%, 23%, and 9% in trial B. On multivariate analysis, lymph node-positive resection was the strongest prognostic factor for OS. A pancreatic primary and positive margin status were also associated with inferior survival (P < .05). Rates of grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicity in trials A and B were 2% and 7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to report long-term outcomes of MMC with 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemoradiation in periampullary cancers. Because MMC may be considered in DNA repair-deficient carcinomas, randomized trials are needed to determine the true benefit of adjuvant MMC.

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Preliminary Results

AIM

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer located in the pancreatic body.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with biopsy-proven locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were considered for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Postprocedural computed tomography studies and Ca19.9 tumor marker evaluation were performed at 24 hours and 1 month. At computed tomography, treatment effect was evaluated by excluding the presence of complications. The technical success of the procedure is defined at computed tomography as the achievement of tumoral ablated area.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients have been included in the study. Five of the 23 patients were excluded. At computed tomography, the mean size of the intralesional postablation necrotic area was 32 mm (range: 15-65 mm). Technical success of the procedure has been obtained in 16 (93%) of the 18 cases. None of the patients developed postprocedural complications. Mean Ca19.9 serum levels 1 day before, 1 day after, and 1 month after the procedure were 285.8 U/mL (range: 16.6-942.0 U/mL), 635.2 U/mL (range: 17.9-3368.0 U/mL), and 336.0 U/mL (range: 7.0-1400.0 U/mL), respectively. Follow-up duration was less than 6 months for 11 patients and more than 6 months for 7 patients. At the time of the draft of this article, the mean survival of the patients included in the study was 185 days (range: 62-398 days).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of locally advanced adenocarcinoma has a high technical success rate and is effective in cytoreduction both at imaging and laboratory controls.

Multidisciplinary neoadjuvant management for potentially curable pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality in the U.S. Despite advances in surgical technique, radiotherapy technologies, and chemotherapeutics, the 5-year survival rate remains approximately 20% for the 15% of patients who are eligible for surgical resection. The majority of this group suffers metastatic recurrence. However, despite advances in therapies for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, only surgery has consistently proven to improve long-term survival. Various combinations of chemotherapy, biologic-targeted therapy, and radiotherapy have been evaluated in different settings to improve outcomes. In this context, a neoadjuvant (preoperative) treatment strategy offers numerous potential benefits: (1) ensuring delivery of early, systemic therapy, (2) improving selection of patients for surgical therapy with truly localized disease, (3) potential downstaging of the neoplasm facilitating a negative margin resection in patients with locally advanced disease, and (4) providing a superior clinical trial mechanism capable of rapid assessment of the efficacy of novel therapeutics. This article reviews the recent trends in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with a particular emphasis on a multidisciplinary neoadjuvant approach to treatment.

Neoadjuvant therapy for non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Treatment of pancreatic cancer is increasingly multimodal, with patients receiving chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical extirpation in hope of long-term cure. There is ongoing debate over the timing, sequence, and necessity of these treatments as they pertain to the spectrum of local-regional disease. Current guidelines support a neoadjuvant strategy in patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable disease. Although there is currently no high-level evidence to recommend neoadjuvant therapy for all patients, there are data to suggest that wider application of neoadjuvant therapy may be beneficial. Random-assignment prospective trials are ongoing. In this review we examine the literature addressing a neoadjuvant approach to potentially resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer and highlight the outcomes of preoperative emergence of latent metastatic disease, attempted resection rates, margin negative resection rates, and pathologic response to treatment.

Management of borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Where do we stand?

Many patients with pancreas cancer present with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The principle tools used for diagnosis and staging of LAPC include endoscopic ultrasound, axial imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and diagnostic laparoscopy. The definition of resectability has historically been vague, as there is considerable debate and controversy as to the definition of LAPC. For the patient with LAPC, there is some level of involvement of the surrounding vascular structures, which include the superior mesenteric artery, celiac axis, hepatic artery, superior mesenteric vein, or portal vein. When feasible, most surgeons would recommend possible surgical resection for patients with borderline LAPC, with the goal of an R0 resection. For initially unresectable LAPC, neoadjuvant should be strongly considered. Specifically, these patients should be offered neoadjuvant therapy, and the tumor should be assessed for possible response and eventual resection. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy with this approach as a bridge to potential curative resection is broad, ranging from 3%-79%. The different modalities of neoadjuvant therapy include single or multi-agent chemotherapy combined with radiation, chemotherapy alone, and chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy with radiation. This review focuses on patients with LAPC and addresses recent advances and controversies in the field.

Neoadjuvant treatment of duodenal adenocarcinoma: a rescue strategy

AIM

To evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and rescue surgery in the management of unresectable or recurrent duodenal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all adults treated with neoadjuvant therapy and rescue surgery for locally unresectable or locally recurrent duodenal adenocarcinoma from 1994 to 2010.

RESULTS

Ten patients received various forms of neoadjuvant therapy prior to operative exploration for potential resection. Six patients presented with locally unresectable disease, while four had local recurrences. Six patients had vascular encasement, three had retroperitoneal extension with vascular invasion, and one had invasion of surrounding organs. Of the six patients with locally advanced disease, preoperative therapy consisted of chemotherapy alone (3) or chemoradiotherapy (3). Of the four patients with local recurrences, preoperative therapy consisted of chemotherapy alone (1), chemoradiotherapy alone (1), chemoradiotherapy after chemotherapy (1), and chemoradiotherapy followed by combination chemotherapy (1). Nine of ten patients became resectable after neoadjuvant therapy. Clinically, two patients had complete responses, and four had partial responses. Histopathology revealed complete pathologic response in two patients and near-complete pathologic response in one (<1 mm of residual disease). Currently, five patients are alive (range 18-83 months postoperatively). All have no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy may convert locally unresectable duodenal adenocarcinoma to resectable disease with subsequent prolonged survival.

Neoadjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer: the emerging paradigm?

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest cancers due to difficulty in early diagnosis and its high resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. It is now clear that even patients with potentially resectable disease require multimodality treatment including chemotherapy and/or radiation to improve resectability and reduce recurrence. Tremendous efforts are currently being invested in refining preoperative staging to identify optimal surgical candidates, and also in developing various neoadjuvant or adjuvant regimens to improve surgical outcome. Although at present no studies have been done to directly compare the benefit of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant approaches, accumulating evidence suggests that the neoadjuvant approach is probably beneficial for a subset of the patient population, particularly those with borderline resectable disease in which complete surgical resection is almost certainly unachievable. In this article, we review the literature and rationales of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation, as well as their potential limitations and caveats. We also review the pathological findings following neoadjuvant therapies, and potential surgical complications that may be associated with neoadjuvant therapies.

A phase I study evaluating the role of the anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab as a radiosensitizer with chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

(1) To determine the safety of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab with concurrent gemcitabine and abdominal radiation in the treatment of patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. (2) To evaluate the feasibility of pancreatic cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) molecular profiling as a potential predictor of response to anti-EGFR treatment.

METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic, locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated in this dose escalation study with gemcitabine (0-300 mg/m(2)/week) given concurrently with cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading dose, 250 mg/m(2) weekly maintenance dose) and abdominal irradiation (50.4 Gy). Expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was assessed by immunohistochemistry in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were enrolled in 4 treatment cohorts with escalating doses of gemcitabine. Incidence of grade 1-2 adverse events was 96%, and incidence of 3-4 adverse events was 9%. There were no treatment-related mortalities. Two patients who exhibited favorable treatment response underwent surgical exploration and were intraoperatively confirmed to have unresectable tumors. Median overall survival was 10.5 months. Pancreatic cancer cell expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was successfully determined in EUS-FNA specimens from 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cetuximab can be safely administered with abdominal radiation and concurrent gemcitabine (up to 300 mg/m(2)/week) in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. This combined therapy modality exhibited limited activity. Diagnostic EUS-FNA specimens could be analyzed for molecular markers of EMT in a minority of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma--are we forcing a milestone?

Survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is low and the role of adjuvant therapy remains controversial, with the European studies indicating survival benefit of chemotherapy over chemoradiation, whereas the American reports indicate an undoubted benefit with chemoradiation. Whatever is the mode of adjuvant care, two things are obvious in the management of this disease: surgery is the mainstay of treatment and a complete resection is the only hope of cure. Secondly, irrespective of the adjuvant treatment modality, survival advantage is limited and five-year survival has failed to reach that of other malignancies. The mixed results obtained from the various adjuvant therapy trials indicate that a uniform protocol is yet to be reached. A milestone is said to have been reached when a treatment or a treatment modality revolutionizes the outcome of a disease. As of now the adjuvant treatment in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still evolving. Maybe a fresh look is needed at the biological aspect of the disease to add a new thought in its management, as has happened with other human malignancies.

[A case of locally invasive obstructive jejunal cancer with curative resection after stenting and chemotherapy]

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy. In Korea, 13.1% of small bowel adenocarcinoma occurs in the jejunum. The absence of effective screening methods and relatively obscure symptoms contribute to the higher percentage of advanced cases at the time of diagnosis. Although curative resection is the mainstay of treatment, it is often impossible. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have shown a disappointing treatment result for advanced staged small bowel adenocarcinoma. We report a 54-year-old woman with locally invasive jejunal cancer who underwent curative resection after stent insertion with enteroscopy and chemotherapy.

Chemoradiation in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a literature review

Adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas has an annual incidence of 7,400 cases in the U.K. In comparison with other common cancers of solid organs, namely, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer has a high morbidity and mortality. Radical resection is possible in only 15%-20% of patients, and only 3%-4% of all patients presenting with this condition achieve long-term control and cure. Various strategies in the form of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment have been employed over the years to improve outcome, with limited success. Systemic chemotherapy remains the gold standard in the metastatic setting in good performance status patients, and adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of localized and locally advanced cancer has been found to improve outcome. The role of radiotherapy, however, remains controversial and is an area that merits further investigation in well-conducted multicenter trials at various stages of the disease in combination with systemic agents and exploiting recent advances in the delivery of radiotherapy. In this article, we review the published literature on the use of chemoradiation as a modality in various stages of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and highlight areas that future trials in this field should target for a way forward in this malignancy.

Current state of adjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic carcinoma cannot generally be cured by surgery alone. This review summarizes the development of adjuvant therapy over the past two decades. Four randomized controlled trials compare long-term survival of different treatments. The small GITSG-study supports combined chemoradiation, but the EORTC-study found no significant effect. A Norwegian study of adjuvant chemotherapy found an increased median survival, but no effect beyond two years. The large ESPAC-1 study shows a benefit for 5-FU based chemotherapy, while chemoradiation had a negative effect. Thus, evidence favours adjuvant therapy, but 5-FU may not be the ultimate drug. Support for gemcitabine is given by preliminary data from a German randomized trial, and further American and European studies are upcoming. However, postoperative therapy is problematic, as 20-30% of resected patients never undergo treatment because of slow recovery or other reasons. Preoperative therapy has some theoretical advantages, and moreover, patients with rapidly progressive disease may be spared surgery. Randomized controlled trials are lacking, but published results compare well with postoperative, adjuvant therapy. The value of locally targeted therapy is difficult to assess. Reasonable results have been obtained with regional chemotherapy, whereas intraoperative radiotherapy does not seem to increase survival despite reducing reducing local recurrences.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma

Small bowel cancers are rare, accounting for only about 6000 cases/year in the United States, approximately 25% of which are small bowel adenocarcinomas. Small bowel adenocarcinomas have traditionally been considered to be highly fatal due to their nonspecific presentation at the time of diagnosis, and to the lack of responsiveness to older chemotherapy regimens. However, that paradigm may be changing. Newer diagnostic techniques such as video capsule and double balloon enteroscopy may facilitate earlier diagnosis. In addition, modern chemotherapy regimens have produced improved response rates and survival rates, when compared to historical controls. Still, there remains great need for multi-institutional, cooperative group studies to define the optimal treatment of small bowel adenocarcinoma, both in the adjuvant and advanced/metastatic setting.

Duodenal adenocarcinoma: patterns of failure after resection and the role of chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

To report patterns of disease recurrence after resection of adenocarcinoma of the duodenum and compare outcomes between patients undergoing surgery only vs. surgery with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CT-RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing potentially curative therapy for adenocarcinoma of the duodenum at Duke University Medical Center and affiliated hospitals between 1975 and 2005. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local control (LC) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate regression analysis evaluated the effect of CT-RT on clinical endpoints.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were identified (23 M, 9 F). Median age was 60 years (range, 32-77 years). Surgery alone was performed in 16 patients. An additional 16 patients received either preoperative (n = 11) or postoperative (n = 5) CT-RT. Median RT dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 12.6-54 Gy). All patients treated with RT also received concurrent 5-fluorouracil-based CT. Two patients treated preoperatively had a pathologic complete response (18%), and none had involved lymph nodes at resection. Five-year OS, DFS, and LC for the entire group were 48%, 47%, and 55%, respectively. Five-year survival did not differ between patients receiving CT-RT vs. surgery alone (57% vs. 44%, p = 0.42). However, in patients undergoing R0 resection, CT-RT appeared to improve OS (5-year 83% vs. 53%, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Local failure after surgery alone is high. Given the patterns of relapse with surgery alone and favorable outcomes in patients undergoing complete resection with CT-RT, the use of CT-RT in selected patients should be considered.

Chemotherapy in Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: 10-year Experience of the British Columbia Cancer Agency

AIMS

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare, frequently lethal, malignancy. Little is known about the use and value of chemotherapy in patients with SBA. We assessed this issue in a consecutive cohort of patients from British Columbia, Canada.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with SBA seen at the British Columbia Cancer Agency from January 1990 to September 2000 were identified. A retrospective systematic chart review was undertaken and a survival analysis conducted.

RESULTS

Forty-eight SBA were identified in 47 subjects. Chemotherapy was given to 21 of the 47 subjects (45%). Of 19 patients treated initially with curative intent, the median overall survival was 38.6 months. Five received adjuvant chemotherapy, with two subsequently recurring. Thirty-seven patients initially or eventually had advanced disease: 16 received 22 palliative intent fluoropyrimidine-based regimens. Only one partial response was seen in the first line (objective response rate 6%). The median overall survival for those who received palliative chemotherapy was 15.6 months compared with 7.7 months for those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy use is common in SBA. Our data and available published studies suggest that chemotherapy may provide benefit, but the optimal chemotherapy regimen and the degree of benefit remain to be defined. A sound approach to investigate the management of rare malignancies is desperately needed.

A phase I study of eniluracil/5-FU in combination with radiation therapy for potentially resectable and/or unresectable cancer of the pancreas and distal biliary tract

PURPOSE

Eniluracil is an effective inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). It allows for oral dosing of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which may potentially improve the antitumor activity of 5-FU when delivered concurrently with radiotherapy while avoiding the inconvenience and morbidity of continuous infusion (CI) 5-FU. We addressed the safety of oral eniluracil/5-FU combined with radiation therapy and determined the profile of dose-limiting toxicities and recommended Phase II dose (RPTD) in patients with pancreatic and hepatobiliary cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with resectable or locally advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer received eniluracil (starting at 6.0 mg/m(2) q12h)/5-FU (starting at 0.6 mg/m(2) q12h). Eniluracil/5-FU were given concurrently with preoperative radiation to 4500 cGy followed by 540 cGy by reduced fields. Surgery was considered 4 weeks after completion of therapy.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were enrolled. Chemoradiotherapy was completed in all patients. The MTD was not reached and, thus, the RPTD of eniluracil/5-FU was determined to be 10 mg/m(2) q12h/1 mg/m(2) q12h. Two patients with locally advanced disease had a 30-45 percent cross-sectional tumor reduction, one of which underwent margin-negative resection. Two of 5 patients with pancreatic cancer, and 1 of 3 patients with cholangiocarcinoma, with underwent exploratory surgery had margin-negative resections. One patient had a pathologic complete response (pCR). Patient 5-FU plasma exposure increased slightly from Day 8 to Day 31.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral eniluracil/5-FU is feasible, well tolerated, and potentially effective in the neoadjuvant setting. Further investigation of oral fluoropyrimidines as radiosensitizers for pancreaticobiliary malignancies is warranted.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

In spite of the high mortality in pancreatic cancer, significant progress is being made. This review discusses multimodality therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgical therapy currently offers the only potential monomodal cure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, only 10-20% of patients present with tumors that are amenable to resection, and even after resection of localized cancers, long-term survival is rare. The addition of chemoradiation therapy significantly increases median survival. To achieve long-term success in treating this disease it is therefore increasingly important to identify effective neoadjuvant/adjuvant multimodality therapies. Preoperative chemoradiation for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer has the following advantages: (1) neoadjuvant treatment would eliminate the delay of adjuvant treatment due to postoperative complications; (2) neoadjuvant treatment could avoid unnecessary surgery for patients with metastatic disease evident on restaging after neoadjuvant therapy; (3) down-staging after neoadjuvant therapy may increase the likelihood of negative surgical margins; and (4) neoadjuvant treatment could prevent peritoneal tumor cell implantation and dissemination caused during surgery. This review systematically summarizes the current status, controversies, and prospects of neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Surgical Resection after Radiochemotherapy in Patients with Unresectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

BACKGROUND

The use of chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer has been advocated for its potential ability to downstage locally advanced tumors. This article reports our experience with chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (superior mesenteric artery or celiac axis encasement).

STUDY DESIGN

Since 1998, 61 patients with radiographically unresectable, pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma have received standard fractionation radiation therapy (total dose, 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy, 5 d/wk) with chemotherapy, which included a continuous infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU: 650 mg/m(2)/D1-D5 and D21-D25) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)/bolus D2 and D22). Patients with tumor response at restaging CT scan underwent surgical exploration to determine whether the tumor was resectable.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight of 61 (62%) restaged patients demonstrated a disease progression. Twenty-three patients (38%) had an objective response, with, in all cases, persistence of arterial encasement. Twenty-three patients underwent exploratory operations after chemoradiotherapy, and 13 underwent standard Whipple resection. So 13 of 23 (56%) patients who had exploratory operation, or 23 of 61 (21%) patients, underwent surgical resection. With a median followup of 27 months, median survival for the resected patients was 28 months. Median survival was 11 months in the nonresponder group (n = 38) and 20 months in the group who received a palliative procedure (n = 10).

CONCLUSIONS

Locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma may be downstaged by chemoradiotherapy to allow for surgical resection. Patients whose cancer becomes resectable have a median survival at least comparable with survival after resection for initially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Emerging drugs in pancreatic cancer

Improving survival in patients with pancreatic cancer remains a formidable challenge. For the few patients with localised stages of the disease, intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies remain non-validated and the survival benefit conferred by 5-fluorouracil-folinic acid adjuvant chemotherapy over radical surgery alone is still a matter of debate. Gemcitabine has recently emerged as the standard single agent in advanced stages of the disease and pharmacokinetic refinements such as the use of a fixed-dose infusion rate may further improve still rather modest result figures. At present, most efforts deal with the development of more effective doublet or triplet therapies, combining gemcitabine with either conventional cytotoxic drugs--the most promising being oxaliplatin--or more innovative, targeted therapeutic agents. Among these agents, matrix metalloprotease inhibitors and farnesyltransferase inhibitors have already undergone Phase III trials, alone or in combination with gemcitabine, with rather disappointing results. However, preclinical and Phase I and II studies of cyclooxygenase-2 or lipoxygenase inhibitors, various immunotherapeutic approaches and several tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies against growth factors or their receptors are encouraging and may provide some hope for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic cancer

The length and quality of life of patients with localized pancreatic cancer will be maximized by accurate preoperative assessment of resectability, a standardized technique of tumor resection, and the routine use of protocol-based adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Continued efforts to enroll patients with localized and advanced pancreatic cancer into well-designed clinical trials should remain a high priority for oncologists across all disciplines. At present, preoperative therapy remains investigational but has a sound clinical basis and remains a reasonable alternative to up front surgery. Future clinical trials for resectable pancreatic cancer will lead to progress only if the principles of multidisciplinary cancer care and quality assurance are incorporated into their design and conduct.

The evolution of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation for advanced pancreatic cancer: from 5-fluorouracil to GTX

This article reviews the relevant literature and reports on The Columbia University Medical Center experience with chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer.

Assessment of pathologic response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The benefits provided by preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in pancreatic ductular adenocarcinoma (PDA) are still controversial. However, in most reports from referral centers, improvement in local control and survival appears to be provided in selected patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the radiation-induced pathologic effects of preoperative CRT in patients with resectable PDA and determine the precise long-term outcome of the responding patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 1996 and October 2003, 61 patients underwent preoperative CRT for resectable PDA. The tumor location was the pancreatic head in 49 patients and pancreatic body in 12 patients. Of the 61 patients, 21 (34.5%) did not undergo surgery because of disease progression and 40 (65.5%) underwent pancreatic resection, including pancreaticoduodenectomy in 32 (80%) and distal pancreatectomy in 8 (20%).

RESULTS

A major pathologic response was noted in 9 patients, including three complete responses, and was found only in patients with tumor of the pancreatic head. The local control rate was similar in patients with and without a major pathologic response. Survival in patients with a major response was significantly greater than in those without a response or with a minor response.

CONCLUSION

Major tumor downstaging can be provided by preoperative CRT in patients with resectable cephalic PDA. Survival appears to be significantly improved in selected patients.

Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: A Rare but Aggressive Disease

Unlike the colon and rectum, the small intestine is associated with a very low rate of tumor occurrence. Adenocarcinomas represent the most frequent of these rare digestive tumors and are often fatal as a result of tardy diagnosis. Regardless of the stage, surgery usually remains the cornerstone of small bowel adenocarcinoma therapy. Because of the rarity of the disease, very few significant clinical trials have identified any efficient nonsurgical treatment; however, recent data indicate these tumors might be sensitive to chemotherapy alone or in association with radiation therapy. Conversely, a great deal of progress has been achieved in diagnosis of the tumor, whether by adaptation of existing techniques or development of new ones. We reviewed the clinical aspects of this rare but aggressive disease, focusing on new diagnostic procedures as well as on recent advances in their therapeutic management.

Old and new drugs in systemic therapy of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence of pancreatic cancer nearly equals its death rate (97%). Two-year survival is about 10%. Chemotherapy treatment is problematic because of the palliative and limited duration of response.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The article analyzes the objective response and median survival time (MST) for old and new drugs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

The most encouraging results to date come from studies of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as an adjuvant therapy and of gemcitabine in the advanced disease, which is one of the most active and best tolerated drugs in recent years. However, with the introduction of new drugs or with different old drug associations, interesting results are also becoming evident.

CONCLUSIONS

New approaches to CT treatment are necessary. Patient enrollment into rigorous and well conducted clinical trials, either at tumor diagnosis or after tumor recurrence, will generate new information regarding investigational therapies and it will offer improved therapies for patients with this disease.

Surgical resection following radiation therapy with concurrent gemcitabine in patients with previously unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

The combination of gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy (Gem/RT) is a promising new approach that is being investigated in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. However, substantial toxicity with this combination has also been observed. This review was conducted to determine whether Gem/RT could be safely delivered in the neoadjuvant setting, based on our experience with this combined therapy in a cohort of patients with previously unresectable pancreatic cancer, who subsequently underwent surgical resection. Between July 1996 and June 2001, a total of 67 patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer, without distant metastatic disease, received Gem/RT at our institution. Seventeen patients (25%) underwent exploratory surgery following Gem/RT, and nine underwent standard Whipple resection. Thus 9 (52%) of 17 patients who had exploratory operations or 9 (13%) of 67 patients, underwent surgical resection. Thirty-day mortality after resection was 0%, and there were no major surgical complications. Median length of hospital stay was 14 days (range 11 to 19 days). With a median follow-up of 32 months, median survival for the resected patients was 17.6 months (95% confidence interval 12.6 to 37.3 months). Median survival for the remaining 58 patients was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval 9.6 to 14.7 months, P=0.013). We conclude that surgical resection may be safely performed after Gem/RT in a select group of patients initially considered to have unresectable pancreatic cancer. The use of Gem/RT in a neoadjuvant setting is currently being investigated in a multi-institutional phase II trial.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: historical and current perspectives

The results from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma appear to be improving with increased resection rates and reduced postoperative mortality reported by specialist pancreatic cancer teams. Developments with medical oncological treatments have been difficult, however, due to the fundamentally aggressive biological nature of pancreatic cancer and its resistance to chemotherapy coupled with a relative dearth of randomised controlled trials. The European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC)-1 trial recruited nearly 600 patients and is the largest trial in pancreatic cancer. The results demonstrated that the current best adjuvant treatment is chemotherapy using bolus 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid. The median survival of patients randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy was 15.5 months and is comparable with many other studies, but the median survival in the chemotherapy arm was 19.7 months and is as good or superior to multimodality treatments including intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neo-adjuvant therapies. The use of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid may be supplanted by gemcitabine but requires confirmation by ongoing clinical trials, notably ESPAC-3, which plans to recruit 990 patients from Europe, Canada and Australasia. Major trials such as ESPAC-1 and ESPAC-3 have set new standards for the development of adjuvant treatment and it is now clear that such treatment in this field has the potential to significantly improve both patient survival and quality of life after curative resection.

Surgical resection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy benefits selected patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

Simultaneous chemoradiation is used in unresectable pancreatic cancer for palliation. It is not known if the use of adjuvant surgery will benefit this group of patients. From November 1991 to September 1998, 47 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were treated with simultaneous preoperative radiation therapy (45 Gy) and chemotherapy. Chemotherapy followed three different protocols: cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil +/- paclitaxel; cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (protracted infusion); and docetaxel and gemcitabine. Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy was performed 1 month after the end of radiation in patients selected for resection. Twenty-three unresectable tumors after preoperative treatment (47%) received an additional dose (10-12 Gy) of radiotherapy using intraoperative or external radiation therapy. Twelve patients (26%) were considered to have clinically resectable tumors after the preoperative treatment. Nine patients had surgery (19% of the total number of patients), and 2 of them had complete pathologic response. After chemoradiation, two patients died of pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding, respectively, and another two patients died in the postoperative period. Local recurrence was observed in 22% of the patients and 57% had distant metastases. Three-year survival rates for patients with unresectable and resectable tumors was 0% (median survival 10 months) and 48% (median survival 23 months), respectively (p = 0.0004). Preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer is feasible. In some patients, the tumor can be resected, and in addition some cases of complete pathologic response were found. Long-term survivors were observed in the group of resected tumors. More effective chemotherapy regimens are needed because the majority of the patients died of metastatic disease.

A phase II single institutional experience with preoperative radiochemotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a limited impact on survival. We hypothesized that delivering preoperative radiochemotherapy (RTCT) might enhance local control of the cancer and improve survival.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with localized pancreatic cancer (14 head and 5 body) were treated during the past 4 years with an intramural protocol consisting of continuous infusion of fluorouracile (5-FU: 650 mg/m(2)/D1-D5 and D21-D25 and Cisplatin 80 mg/m(2)/bolus D2 and D22 with preoperative external beam radiotherapy (RT) (30Gy split course RT or 45 Gy standard fractionation RT).

RESULTS

Four patients did not have surgical resection: Three patients were noted to have liver metastases and 1 patient developed peritoneal carcinomatosis. The remaining 15 patients had potentially curative resection (12 Whipple procedure and 3 distal subtotal pancreatectomy). There was no postoperative death. Pathologic findings showed five major responses including 2 patients with complete pathologic response. The overall median survival for the 19 study patients was 20 months. The median disease free and 2-year overall survival for the group with resection were 30 months and 52.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative RTCT followed by resection is well-tolerated and safe for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Major histological response occurred for 25% of patients. This approach could offer improvement in patient survival.

Adjuvant radiotherapy in resectable pancreatic carcinoma

AIM

Pancreatic cancer is a near fatal disease. External beam radiotherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been proposed with the aim to improve clinical outcome in resectable tumors. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and outcome in patients with cT1-3 pancreatic cancer, treated with surgery, external beam radiotherapy and IORT.

METHODS

From 1990 to 1996, 17 patients with clinical stage T1-3N0-1M0 adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas were treated with pancreatectomy and pre- (nine patients: 5 Gy), intra- (all patients: 10 Gy) and post-operative (all patients: 50 Gy) radiotherapy. The pathologic T stages were: 4 pT2 and 13 pT3. The pathologic N stages were: 9 pN0 and 8 pN1. Minimum follow-up in living patients was 60 months.

RESULTS

No perioperative mortalities were recorded. Two patients showed postoperative morbidity (11.8%) which required a subsequent laparotomy. The disease-free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 41, 23 and 18%, respectively (median: 9 months). The overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 70%, 41% and 18%, respectively (median: 17.5 months). Three patients developed local failure (17.6%) and 12 patients showed distant metastases (70.6%). Univariate analysis (logrank) showed: a significant correlation between both N-stage and retroperitoneal involvement (RPI) with local control (N-stage: P=0.0155; RPI:P =0.0295), a significant correlation between maximum tumor size and metastases-free survival (P=0.0167) and overall survival (P=0.0241); the female gender was another predictor of prolonged survival (P= 0.0465). Multivariate analysis (Cox) showed a significant impact of N-stage and retroperitoneal involvement on local control and also a significant correlation between perineural involvement and tumor diameter with metastases-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are similar to those of other published series and suggest that this approach is feasible with acceptable local control and survival, especially in patients with small tumors (<2.5 cm: 5 year survival=33.3%) and in female patients (5 year survival=30%). Due to the impact of gender, tumor diameter and N stage on prognosis, in the design of future trials a stratification of patients based on these categories should be considered. The search of effective chemotherapeutic agents is required, to reduce the high incidence of distant metastases, especially in larger tumors.

Surgical and medical therapy for pancreatic carcinoma

Progress on the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has involved advances in medical and surgical care with important contributions from disciplines such as radiology and intensive care. In the last decade large randomized controlled trials have been undertaken that demonstrate the improved patient outcomes. There is an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis, hereditary pancreatitis and a variety of familial cancer syndromes. The optimum outcome from pancreatic cancer needs management by multidisciplinary teams in regional specialist units. Endoscopic stenting, good pain relief and pancreatic enzyme supplementation are the basis of care in advanced pancreatic cancer. Chemotherapy prolongs survival in advanced pancreatic cancer with little to be gained using drugs other than 5FU. Resection, if possible, prolongs life and provides the best quality of life. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is of no benefit but chemotherapy may improve survival. Alongside the evolution in clinical management has been the elucidation of the molecular events that underlie pancreatic cancer and this knowledge has guided the introduction of targeted treatments for pancreatic cancer.

En bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the pancreas: is it worthwhile?

The benefit of radical surgical resection of contiguously involved structures for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine patient outcome after extended pancreatic resection for locally advanced tumors and to determine if any subset of extended resection affected outcome. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 116 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, who underwent extirpative pancreatic surgery between 1987 and 2000. Of the 116 patients, 37 (32%) required resection of surrounding structures (group I), and 79 patients (68%) underwent standard pancreatic resections (group II). In all cases, all macroscopic disease was excised. In group I a total of 46 contiguously involved structures were resected: vascular in 25 patients (54%), mesocolon in 16 (35%) (colic vessels in 3, colon in 13), adrenal in three (7%), liver in one (2%), stomach in one (2%) (for a tumor in the tail of the pancreas), and multiple structures in four. Excision of regional blood vessels included the superior mesenteric vein and/or portal vein in 16, hepatic artery in five, and celiac axis in four. No differences between groups I and II were detected for any of the following parameters: age, sex, history of previous operation, estimated blood loss, or hospital stay. For the entire cohort the morbidity and mortality were 38% and 1.7%, respectively, and these rates were similar in the two groups. Adjuvant therapy was administered to more than 90% of patients in both groups. However, patients in group I were more likely to have received neoadjuvant therapy (76% vs. 42%, P = 0.001). Total pancreatectomy and distal pancreatectomy were more often performed in group I (P = 0.005). Additionally, the median operative time was longer (8.5 hours compared to 6.9 hours (P = 0.0004)). Both groups had similar rates of microscopically positive margins and involved lymph nodes, as well as total number of lymph nodes removed. The median survival was 26 months for patients in group I and 16 months for patients in group II (P = 0.08). The median disease-free survival for groups I and II was 16 months and 14 months, respectively (P = 0.88). In comparing patients in group I, who underwent vascular resection vs. mesocolon (colon or middle colic vessels) resection, the median survival was 26 months and 19 months, respectively (P = 0.12). We were unable to detect a difference in outcome for patients with locally advanced cancers requiring extended pancreatic resections compared to patients with standard resections. En bloc resection of involved surrounding structures, to completely extirpate all macroscopic disease, may be of benefit in selected patients with locally advanced disease, particularly when combined with preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies of pancreatic cancer: a review

The survival of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer is dismal. Few patients on initial presentation are suitable for surgical resection. This has prompted clinical studies with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy designed either to increase the number of patients eligible for surgery (neoadjuvant therapy) or to prolong the survival of patients who had undergone surgery (adjuvant therapy). None of these studies may at this time be considered definitive. Wherever possible, patients felt eligible for neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy should be entered on clinical trials. Where this is not possible, clinicians should exercise their best judgment in offering this type of treatment to pancreatic cancer patients under their care.

Surgery and cancer of the pancreas: will common sense become common practice?

Pancreatic cancer is a systemic disease for most patients. Operations with the intent to cure may be done safely (mortality, < 3%) with shorter hospital stays. Surgery has been minimally effective as a long-term cure. Endoscopic palliation of jaundice is becoming standard practice. Common sense dictates a defined and clear role for surgery (i.e., strict patient selection criteria). Surgery is of great value for small, localized lesions; of clear value as palliative therapy when nonoperative measures fail; and perhaps best applied after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Surgery is just part of the armamentarium available to treat pancreatic cancer. Novel systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and so-called targeted therapies, are becoming increasingly valuable in the management of this systemic disease and are discussed in detail in other articles in this issue.

The role of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Patients with pancreatic cancer have a very poor outlook. There have been major advances in the standard surgical treatment of this disease, resulting in decreased post-operative mortality and morbidity. The use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been developed to increase long-term patient survival following potentially curative resection. The standard chemotherapeutic agent is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), although newer cytotoxic agents are in clinical trials for advanced cancer. Initial studies of adjuvant therapy have been based on small numbers of patients, but recently two large European randomised controlled trials of adjuvant therapy (EORTC and ESPAC-1) have been completed. These suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy has a significant survival advantage over resection alone but chemoradiotherapy does not. Promising new agents are being developed and tested mainly in clinical trials of advanced pancreatic cancer. The results of large-scale randomised controlled trials to assess adjuvant therapies for pancreatic cancer demonstrate the great surgical and oncological progress that has been made over the past decade.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

The use of neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for pancreatic cancer has been advocated for its potential ability to optimize patient selection for surgical resection and to downstage locally advanced tumors. This article reports our experience with neoadjuvant CRT for localized pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Since 1995, 111 patients with radiographically localized, pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma have received neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; median, 4500 cGy) with 5-flourouracil-based chemotherapy. Tumors were defined as potentially resectable (PR, n = 53) in the absence of arterial involvement and venous occlusion and locally advanced (LA, n = 58) with arterial involvement or venous occlusion by CT.

RESULTS

Five patients (4.5%) were not restaged due to death (n = 3) or intolerance of therapy (n = 2). Twenty-one patients (19%) manifested distant metastatic disease on restaging CT. Twenty-eight patients with initially PR tumors (53%) and 11 patients with initially LA tumors (19%) were resected after CRT. Histologic examination revealed significant fibrosis in all resected specimens and two complete responses. Surgical margins were negative in 72%, and lymph nodes were negative in 70% of resected patients. Median survival in resected patients has not been reached at a median follow-up of 16 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant CRT provided an opportunity for patients with occult metastatic disease to avoid the morbidity of resection and resulted in tumor downstaging in a minority of patients with LA tumors. Survival after neoadjuvant CRT and resection appears to be at least comparable to survival after resection and adjuvant (postoperative) CRT.

Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer

The outlook for patients with pancreatic cancer has been grim. There have been major advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, leading to a dramatic reduction in post-operative mortality from the development of high volume specialized centres. This stimulated the study of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments in pancreatic cancer including chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. Initial protocols have been based on the original but rather small GITSG study first reported in 1985. There have been two large European trials totalling over 600 patients (EORTC and ESPAC-1) that do not support the use of chemoradiation as adjuvant therapy. A second major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial (541 patients randomized) was some but not conclusive evidence for a survival benefit associated with chemotherapy. A third major finding from the ESPAC-1 trial was that the quality of life was not affected by the use of adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone. The ESPAC-3 trial aims to assess the definitive use of adjuvant chemotherapy in a randomized controlled trial of 990 patients.

A pilot study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for resectable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The goals of this study were to assess the feasibility and toxicity of a regimen of preoperative chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and intraoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer. A secondary objective was to assess pathologic response to chemoradiotherapy in the treated tumors.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients were entered in the protocol. Treatment regimen consisted of 45 Gy of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU given as a continuous infusion at a dose of 300 mg/m2. Patients were restaged 4-6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy and then underwent surgical resection and intraoperative radiotherapy to a dose of 10 Gy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (96%) completed chemoradiotherapy in accordance with the study protocol. Nineteen (83%) of 23 patients who completed chemoradiotherapy underwent surgical resection with D2 lymphadenectomy. Four patients (17%) had progressive disease and were not resected. The morbidity and mortality rates were 32% and 5%, respectively. Of the resected patients, two (11%) had complete pathologic responses while 12 (63%) had pathologic evidence of significant treatment effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer can be delivered safely and is well tolerated. The rate of surgical complications is consistent with that of other recently reported prospective trials of gastrectomy alone. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy resulted in significant pathologic responses in the majority of treated tumors, and complete pathologic responses were achieved in some patients.

Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel

Cancer of the small bowel is a rare entity but its incidence is rising. Historically, outcome is poor despite apparent curative resection. At present surgery remains the only treatment modality of proven benefit in the management of this disease. Recent data would suggest 5-year survival rates in the order of 40-50% at all sites of small bowel cancer. To improve upon this, earlier diagnosis with a high index of suspicion and multicentre adjuvant therapy trials are required.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: current treatment approaches and future challenges

The past several decades have witnessed advances in the management of pancreatic cancer; however, much remains to be accomplished. Emerging techniques in the fields of surgery, RT, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy offer hope for greater locoregional control, survival, and quality of life for these patients.