A comparison of four patient immobilization devices in the treatment of prostate cancer patients with three dimensional conformal radiotherapy

Carbon ion radiotherapy using fiducial markers for prostate cancer in Osaka HIMAK: Treatment planning

PURPOSE

Carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer was performed using two fine needle Gold Anchor (GA) markers for patient position verification in Osaka Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Kansai (Osaka HIMAK). The present study examined treatment plans for prostate cases using beam-specific planning target volume (bsPTV) based on the effect of the markers on dose distribution and analysis of target movements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gafchromic EBT3 film was used to measure dose perturbations caused by markers. First, the relationships between the irradiated film density and absolute dose with different linear energy transfer distributions within a spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) were confirmed. Then, to derive the effect of markers, two types of markers, including GA, were placed at the proximal, center, and distal depths within the same SOBP, and dose distributions behind the markers were measured using the films. The amount of internal motion of prostate was derived from irradiation results and analyzed to determine the margins of the bsPTV.

RESULTS

The linearity of the film densities against absolute doses was constant within the SOBP and the amount of dose perturbations caused by the markers was quantitatively estimated from the film densities. The dose perturbation close behind the markers was smallest (<10% among depths within the SOBP regardless of types of markers) and increased with depth. The effect of two types of GAs on dose distributions was small and could be ignored in the treatment planning. Based on the analysis results of internal motions of prostate, required margins of the bsPTV were found to be 8, 7, and 7 mm in left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We evaluated the dose reductions caused by markers and determined the margins of the bsPTV, which was applied to the treatment using fiducial markers, using the analysis results of prostate movements.

Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of Intrafraction Prostate Displacements for Two Immobilization Systems

Immobilization systems and their corresponding set-up errors influence the clinical target volume to the planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins, which is critical for hypofractionated prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This preliminary study evaluates intrafraction prostate displacement for two immobilization systems (A and B). Six consecutive patients having localized prostate cancer and implanted prostate marker seeds were studied. Planar X-ray images were acquired pre- and post-treatment to find the intrafraction prostate displacement. The average absolute displacements (lateral, longitudinal, vertical) were 0.9 ± 0.4 mm, 1.7 ± 0.1 mm, 1.3 ± 0.3 mm (system A), and 0.5 ± 0.2 mm, 0.6 ± 0.1 mm, 0.8 ± 0.3 mm (system B), with average three-dimensional displacements of 2.6 ± 0.2 mm (system A) and 1.3 ± 0.2 mm (system B). The computed CTV-PTV margins (lateral, longitudinal, vertical) were 2.5 mm, 2.5 mm, 3.6 mm and 1.4 mm, 1.6 mm, 2.4 mm for systems A and B, respectively. This suggests that the immobilization system influences intrafraction prostate displacement and, therefore, the margins applied. However, the margins found for both systems are comparable to the margins used for hypofractionated prostate SBRT.

Comparing Setup Errors Using Portal Imaging in Patients With Gynecologic Cancers by Two Methods of Alignment

AIMS

Alignment tattoos on a lax abdomen contribute to misalignment of patients undergoing abdomino-pelvic radiotherapy (RT). The present study was undertaken to assess setup reproducibility in gynecologic cancer patients positioned identically but aligned for treatment to machine isocenter by two different ways.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study in 35 women treated with radical RT for gynecologic malignancy was undertaken. A RT planning contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan in the supine position using an foot and ankle positioning device was done, and three reference points tattooed on the reference plane, anteriorly at the mons pubis and one on each side laterally at a fixed table top-to-vertical height of 10 cm, whereas a fourth point was tattooed at the xiphoid in the anterior midline. Patients were aligned using either a field center, that is, conventional method (Arm I, n = 18) or by a new setup isocenter (Arm II, n = 17) defined by a cranial offset of 4 cm to the reference plane for daily treatment. Anterior and right lateral digitally reconstructed radiograph setup fields were created at the treatment isocenters and compared with orthogonal megavoltage portal images (PI) taken during initial 3 days of RT and subsequently twice weekly. Setup deviations-rotations and translations were analysed in mediolateral (ML), craniocaudal, and anteroposterior direction. No online and offline corrections were performed. Population systematic error and random error were calculated and planning target volume margins required were estimated using van Herk's formula.

RESULTS

Arm I had 209 PI while Arm II had 188 PI. Patients in arm II had a lesser systematic error in the ML direction. Patients with large pelvic girth (>95 cm) were susceptible for greater movements during treatment, more so in Arm I, major shifts (>5 mm) with respect to Arm II in the ML direction (37% vs. 22%, P = .001). A larger planning target volume expansion was required in Arm I (1.6 cm) compared with Arm II (0.9 cm). The margin expansion required from clinical target volume in anteroposterior direction was about 0.6 cm and about a cm in the craniocaudal direction in both the arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Alignment of patient with anterior tattoo at the relatively immobile portion of lower abdomen (mons pubis) Arm II (setup) is superior to a more cranial location over the flabby abdomen during radiation treatment.

Prospective evaluation of the setup errors and its impact on safety margin for cervical cancer pelvic conformal radiotherapy

Aim

The primary objective was to assess set-up errors (SE) and secondary objective was to determine optimal safety margin (SM).

Background

To evaluate the SE and its impact on the SM utilizing electronic portal imaging (EPI) for pelvic conformal radiotherapy.

Material and methods

20 cervical cancer patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Supine position with ankle and knee rest was used during CT simulation. The contouring was done using consensus guideline for intact uterus. 50 Gy in 25 fractions were delivered at the isocenter with ≥95% PTV coverage. Two orthogonal (Anterior and Lateral) digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) was constructed as a reference image. The pair of orthogonal [Anterior-Posterior and Right Lateral] single exposure EPIs during radiation was taken. The reference DRR and EPIs were compared for shifts, and SE was calculated in the X-axis, Y-axis, and Z-axis directions.

Results

320 images (40 DRRs and 280 EPIs) were assessed. The systematic error in the Z-axis (AP EPI), X-axis (AP EPI), and Y-axis (Lat EPI) ranged from -12.0 to 11.8 mm, -10.3 to 7.5 mm, and -8.50 to 9.70 mm, while the random error ranged from 1.60 to 6.15 mm, 0.59 to 4.93 mm, and 1.02 to -4.35 mm. The SM computed were 7.07, 6.36, and 7.79 mm in the Y-axis, X-axis, and Z-axis by Van Herk's equation, and 6.0, 5.51, and 6.74 mm by Stroom's equation.

Conclusion

The computed SE helps defining SM, and it may differ between institutions. In our study, the calculated SM was approximately 8 mm in the Z-axis, 7 mm in X and Y axis for pelvic conformal radiotherapy.

An investigation of clinical treatment field delivery verification using cherenkov imaging: IMRT positioning shifts and field matching

PURPOSE

Cherenkov light emission has been shown to correlate with ionizing radiation dose delivery in solid tissue. An important clinical application of Cherenkov light is the real-time verification of radiation treatment delivery in vivo. To test the feasibility of treatment field verification, Cherenkov light images were acquired concurrent with radiation beam delivery to standard and anthropomorphic phantoms. Specifically, we tested two clinical treatment scenarios: (a) Observation of field overlaps or gaps in matched 3D fields and (b) Patient positioning shifts during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) field delivery. Further development of this technique would allow real-time detection of treatment delivery errors on the order of millimeters so that patient safety and treatment quality can be improved.

METHODS

Cherenkov light emission was captured using a PI-MAX4 intensified charge coupled device (ICCD) system (Princeton Instruments). All radiation delivery was performed using a Varian Trilogy linear accelerator (linac) operated at 6 MV or 18 MV for photon and 6 MeV or 16 MeV for electron studies. Field matching studies were conducted with photon and electron beams at gantry angles of 0°, 15°, and 45°. For each modality and gantry angle, a total of three data sets were acquired. Overlap and gap distances of 0, 2, 5, and 10 mm were tested and delivered to solid phantom material of 30 × 30 × 5 cm³ . Phantom materials used were white plastic water and brown solid water. Tests were additionally performed on an anthropomorphic phantom with an irregular surface. Positioning shift studies were performed using IMRT fields delivered to a thoracic anthropomorphic phantom. For thoracic phantom measurements, the camera was placed laterally to observe the entire right side of the phantom. Fields were delivered with known translational patient positioning shifts in four directions. Changes in the Cherenkov fluence were evaluated through the generation of difference maps from unshifted Cherenkov images. All images were evaluated using ImageJ, Python, and MATLAB software packages.

RESULTS

For matched fields, Cherenkov images were able to quantitate matched field separations with discrepancies between 2 and 4 mm, depending on gantry angle and beam energy or modality. For all photon and electron beams delivered at a gantry angle of 0°, image analysis indicated average discrepancies of less than 2 mm for all field gaps and overlaps, with 83% of matched fields exhibiting discrepancies less than 1 mm. Beams delivered obliquely to the phantom surface exhibited average discrepancies as high as 4 mm for electron beams delivered at large oblique angles. Finally, for IMRT field delivery, vertical and lateral patient positioning shifts of 2 mm were detected in some cases, indicating the potential detectability threshold of using this technique alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that Cherenkov imaging can be used to support and bolster current treatment delivery verification techniques, improving our ability to recognize and rectify millimeter-scale delivery and positioning errors.

Immobilization versus no immobilization for pelvic external beam radiotherapy

Aim

To identify the most reproducible technique of patient positioning and immobilization during pelvic radiotherapy.

Background

Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of pelvic malignancies. Errors in positioning of patient are an integral component of treatment. The present study compares two methods of immobilization with no immobilization with an aim of identifying the most reproducible method.

Materials and methods

65 consecutive patients receiving pelvic external beam radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. 30, 21 and 14 patients were treated with no-immobilization with a leg separator, whole body vacuum bag cushion (VBC) and six point aquaplast immobilization system, respectively. The systematic error, random error and the planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated for all the three techniques and statistically analyzed.

Results

The systematic errors were the highest in the VBC and random errors were the highest in the aquaplast group. Both systematic and random errors were the lowest in patients treated with no-immobilization. 3D Systematic error (mm, mean ± 1SD) was 4.31 ± 3.84, 3.39 ± 1.71 and 2.42 ± 0.97 for VBC, aquaplast and no-immobilization, respectively. 3D random error (mm, 1SD) was 2.96, 3.59 and 1.39 for VBC, aquaplast and no-immobilization, respectively. The differences were statistically significant between all the three groups. The calculated PTV margins were the smallest for the no-immobilization technique with 4.56, 4.69 and 4.59 mm, respectively, in x, y and z axes, respectively.

Conclusions

Among the three techniques, no-immobilization technique with leg separator was the most reproducible technique with the smallest PTV margins. For obvious reasons, this technique is the least time consuming and most economically viable in developing countries.

Quality Control by Portal Film Analysis in Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Two Different Institutions and Treatment Techniques

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Accuracy and reproducibility of patient setup during radiotherapy for prostate cancer were investigated in two different Institutions (A and B), within their Quality Assurance programs. The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare setup accuracy and reproducibility in Institutions A and B, which adopt different patient positioning and treatment techniques for prostate irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of portal localization films taken during the treatment course was performed: 30 and 21 patients in Institutes A and B, respectively, entered the study. In Institute A, patients were treated in a prone position, utilizing an individualized immobilization cast (either an alpha cradle or a heat and vacuum-formed cellulose acetate cast) with an open table top and individual abdominal wall compressor to minimize small bowel irradiation; a 5-field conformal technique was used. In Institute B, patients were treated in a supine position without any immobilization device; a 6-field BEV-based technique (conformal only for patients treated with a radical aim) was adopted. A total of 598 portal films (420 from Institute A and 178 from Institute B) were analyzed. The mean number of films per patient was 12 (range, 4-29). Systematic and random setup errors were estimated utilizing the statistical method suggested by Bijhold et al. (1992).

RESULTS

When patients with a mean (systematic) error larger than 5, 8 and 10 mm in craniocaudal, lateral and posterior-anterior directions, respectively, were compared, no statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed. Similarly, when comparing portal films, a significant difference (P <0.01) appeared only in the craniocaudal direction (errors > 5 mm: Institute A = 24%; Institute B = 11%). In both Institutes, the SD of random and systematic error distribution ranged from 1.8 to 4.2 mm, with a small prevalence of systematic errors. Only for craniocaudal shifts in Institute A was the random error larger than the systematic error, and it was significantly worse than in Institute B (1 SD, 4.2 mm in Institute A vs 1.8 mm in Institute B).

CONCLUSIONS

Setup errors observed in Institutes A and B were similar and in accord with data reported in the literature. In Institute B, satisfactory geometrical treatment quality was achieved without patient immobilization. In Institute A, the goal of minimizing small bowel irradiation and prostate motion through the aforementioned technique, which makes patient position less comfortable, did not seem to considerably increase daily setup uncertainty.

3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer. Technical Considerations after 5 Years of Experience and 334 Patients Treated at the Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia of Milan, Italy

Aims and Background

To report the technique of 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) currently used at our Institute for the treatment of prostate cancer with a curative intent. A critical review of the technical aspects of the technique is provided.

Methods and Study Design

Between December 1995 and October 2000, 334 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with 3D-CRT. All patients were treated in a prone position with 15 MV X-ray beams and a 6-field technique for all but 20 patients, who were treated with a 3-field technique. Patients were simulated with the rectum and bladder empty. To ensure reproducible positioning, custom-made polyurethane foam or thermoplastic casts were produced for each patient. Subsequently, consecutive CT scan slices were obtained. The clinical target volume and critical organs (rectum and bladder) were identified on each CT slice. The beam's eye view technique was used to spatially display these structures, and the treatment portals were manually shaped based on the images obtained. The beam apertures were initially realized by conventional Cerrobend blocks (48 patients), which were replaced in October 1997 by a computer-driven multi-leaf collimator. The total target dose prescribed at the ICRU point is 76 Gy, delivered in 38 fractions and 54 days. The seminal vesicles are excluded at 70 Gy. Dose-volume histograms were obtained for all patients. If more than 30% of the bladder and/or more than 20% of the rectum receive >95% of the prescribed total dose, the treatment plan is judged as unsatisfactory and is adjusted. The dose-volume histogram can be improved by changing the beam's arrangement and/or weights or by introducing or modifying the wedge filters.

Conclusions

3D-CRT in prostate cancer patients is a highly sophisticated and time-consuming method of dose delivery. Important technical issues remain to be clarified.

Setup error analysis in helical tomotherapy based image-guided radiation therapy treatments

The adequacy of setup margins for various sites in patients treated with helical tomotherapy was investigated. A total of 102 patients were investigated. The breakdown of the patients were as follows: Twenty-five patients each in brain, head and neck (H and N), and pelvis, while 12 patients in lung and 15 in craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Patients were immobilized on the institutional protocol. Altogether 2686 megavoltage computed tomography images were analyzed with 672, 747, 622, 333, and 312 fractions, respectively, from brain, H and N, pelvis, lung, and CSI. Overall systematic and random errors were calculated in three translational and three rotational directions. Setup margins were evaluated using van Herk formula. The calculated margins were compared with the margins in the clinical use for various directions and sites. We found that the clinical isotropic margin of 3 mm was adequate for brain patients. However, in the longitudinal direction it was found to be out of margin by 0.7 mm. In H and N, the calculated margins were well within the isotropic margin of 5 mm which is in clinical use. In pelvis, the calculated margin was within the limits, 8.3 mm versus 10 mm only in longitudinal direction, however, in vertical and lateral directions the calculated margins were out of clinical margins 11 mm versus 10 mm, and 8.7 mm versus 7.0, mm respectively. In lung, all the calculated margins were well within the margins used clinically. In CSI, the variation was found in the middle spine in the longitudinal direction. The clinical margins used in our hospital are adequate enough for sites H and N, lung, and brain, however, for CSI and pelvis the margins were found to be out of clinical margins.

A comparison of two systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Reproducibility of different immobilization systems, which may affect set-up errors, remains uncertain. Immobilization systems and their corresponding set-up errors influence the clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins and thus may result in undesirable treatment outcomes. This study compared the reproducibility of patient positioning with Hipfix system and whole body alpha cradle with respect to localized prostate cancer and investigated the existing CTV-PTV margins in the clinical oncology departments of two hospitals.

METHODS

Forty sets of data of patients with localized T1-T3 prostate cancer were randomly selected from two regional hospitals, with 20 patients immobilized by a whole-body alpha cradle system and 20 by a thermoplastic Hipfix system. Seven sets of the anterior-posterior (AP), cranial-caudal (CC) and medial-lateral (ML) deviations were collected from each patient. The reproducibility of patient positioning within the two hospitals was compared using a total vector error (TVE) parameter. In addition, CTV-PTV margins were computed using van Herk's formula. The resulting values were compared to the current CTV-PTV margins in both hospitals.

RESULTS

The TVE values were 5.1 and 2.8 mm for the Hipfix and the whole-body alpha cradle systems respectively. TVE associated with the whole-body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly less than the Hipfix system (p < 0.05). The CC axis in the Hipfix system attained the highest frequency of large (23.6%) and serious (7.9%) set-up errors. The calculated CTV to PTV margin was 8.3, 1.9 and 2.3 mm for the Hipfix system, and 2.1, 3.4 and 1.8 mm for the whole body alpha cradle in CC, ML and AP axes respectively. All but one (CC axis using Hipfix) margin calculated did not exceed the corresponding hospital protocol. The whole body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly better than the Hipfix system in terms of reproducibility (p < 0.05), especially in the CC axis.

CONCLUSIONS

The whole body alpha cradle system was more reproducible than the Hipfix system. In particular, the difference in CC axis contributed most to the results and the current CC margin for the Hipfix system might be considered as inadequate.

Interfractional variability in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without thermoplastic pelvic immobilization

PURPOSE

To determine the variability of patient positioning errors associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and to assess the impact of thermoplastic pelvic immobilization on these errors using kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2012 to June 2012, the records of 314 IMRT sessions in 19 patients with prostate cancer, performed with or without immobilization at two different facilities in the Korea University Hospital were analyzed. The kV CBCT images were matched to simulation computed tomography (CT) images to determine the simulation-to-treatment variability. The shifts along the x (lateral)-, y (longitudinal)- and z (vertical)-axes were measured, as was the shift in the three dimensional (3D) vector.

RESULTS

The measured systematic errors in the immobilized group during treatment were 0.46 ± 1.75 mm along the x-axis, - 0.35 ± 3.83 mm along the y-axis, 0.20 ± 2.75 mm along the z-axis and 4.05 ± 3.02 mm in the 3D vector. Those of nonimmobilized group were - 1.45 ± 7.50 mm along the x-axis, 1.89 ± 5.07 mm along the y-axis, 0.28 ± 3.81 mm along the z-axis and 8.90 ± 4.79 mm in the 3D vector. The group immobilized with pelvic thermoplastics showed reduced interfractional variability along the x- and y-axes and in the 3D vector compared to the nonimmobilized group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

IMRT with thermoplastic pelvic immobilization in patients with prostate cancer appears to be useful in stabilizing interfractional variability during the planned treatment course.

Development of an optical-based image guidance system: technique detecting external markers behind a full facemask

PURPOSE

Optical image-guided systems (e.g., AlignRT, frameless SonArray, ExacTrac) have been used with advantages of avoiding excessive radiation exposure and real-time patient monitoring. Although these systems showed proven accuracy, they need to modify a full facemask for patients with H&N cancer and brain tumor. We developed an optical-based guidance system to manage interfractional and intrafractional setup errors by tracking external markers behind a full facemask.

METHODS

Infra-red (IR) reflecting markers were attached on the face of a head phantom and then the phantom was immobilized by a full face thermoplastic mask. A stereo camera system consisting of two CCD cameras was mounted on the inferior wall of treatment room. The stereo camera system was calibrated to reconstruct 3D coordinates of multiple markers with respect to the isocenter using the direct linear transform (DLT) algorithm. The real-time position of the phantom was acquired, through the stereo camera system, by detecting the IR markers behind the full facemask. The detection errors with respect to the reference positions of planning CT images were calculated in six degrees of freedom (6-DOF) by a rigid-body registration technique.

RESULTS

The calibration accuracy of the system was in submillimeter (0.33 mm +/- 0.27 mm), which was comparable to others. The mean distance between each of marker positions of optical images and planning CT images was 0.50 mm +/- 0.67 mm. The maximum deviations of 6-DOF registration were less than 1 mm and 1 degrees for the couch translation and rotation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed system showed the accuracy and consistency comparable to the commercial optical guided systems, while allowing us to simultaneously immobilize patients with a full face thermoplastic mask.

Adaptive radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Adaptive radiotherapy has been introduced to manage an individual's treatment by, including patient-specific treatment variation identified and quantified during the course of radiotherapy in the treatment planning and delivering optimization. Early studies have demonstrated that this technique could significantly improve the therapeutic ratio by safely reducing the large target margin that has to be used in conventional radiotherapy for prostate cancer treatment. Clinical application of off-line image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer has demonstrated encouraging clinical outcome. Long-term clinical follow-up has shown significant improvement in terms of tumor control and low toxicity profile, emphasizing the beneficial effect of image-guidance and adaptive treatment. Continuous development in adaptive radiotherapy has made possible additional increases in target dose by further reducing target margin when using online image-guided adaptive intensity-modulated radiation therapy. However, clinical implementation of new techniques should be explored cautiously and should include a comprehensive management strategy to address uncertainties in target definition and delineation in the preclinical implementation studies.

A Retrospective Review of the Effect of a Simple Foot Immobilization Device for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

The goal of radical radiation therapy is to eradicate tumor cells by delivering maximum dose to the target volume. This requires accurate daily positioning of the patient to minimize the chances of a geographical miss of the target and minimize dose to surrounding normal tissue. Numerous studies have been conducted to find the best immobilization device to improve reproducibility and setup of patient positioning for men with prostate cancer with inconclusive results.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively, the consistency and reproducibility of prostate patient positioning using a simple foot immobilization device compared with patients treated without any immobilization device.

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis was completed on 40 patients with histopathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate between April 2007 and May 2007. Twenty charts were randomly selected for men treated without any immobilization device and 20 charts were randomly selected for men treated with the foot strap immobilization. Incidence and frequency of isocenter shifts were the primary end points of this study. Direction and magnitude of shifts were secondary end points.

RESULTS

The frequency of isocenter shifts were greater in the patients treated without immobilization (35%) than with patients treated with foot strap immobilization (10%). Required shifts were in either the superoinferior direction or in the right/left direction. No shifts were required in the anteroposterior direction. Magnitude of shifts greater than and equal to 1.0 cm in magnitude was seen only in those treated without immobilization.

CONCLUSION

The foot strap is a simple and inexpensive method of improving daily setup reliability and reducing the need for isocenter shifts.

Setup reproducibility for thoracic and upper gastrointestinal radiation therapy: Influence of immobilization method and on-line cone-beam CT guidance

We report the setup reproducibility of thoracic and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) radiotherapy (RT) patients for 2 immobilization methods evaluated through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance, and present planning target volume (PTV) margin calculations made on the basis of these observations. Daily CBCT images from 65 patients immobilized in a chestboard (CB) or evacuated cushion (EC) were registered to the planning CT using automatic bony anatomy registration. The standardized region-of-interest for matching was focused around vertebral bodies adjacent to tumor location. Discrepancies >3 mm between the CBCT and CT datasets were corrected before initiation of RT and verified with a second CBCT to assess residual error (usually taken after 90 s of the initial CBCT). Positional data were analyzed to evaluate the magnitude and frequencies of setup errors before and after correction. The setup distributions were slightly different for the CB (797 scans) and EC (757 scans) methods, and the probability of adjustment at a 3-mm action threshold was not significantly different (p = 0.47). Setup displacements >10 mm in any direction were observed in 10% of CB fractions and 16% of EC fractions (p = 0.0008). Residual error distributions after CBCT guidance were equivalent regardless of immobilization method. Using a published formula, the PTV margins for the CB were L/R, 3.3 mm; S/I, 3.5 mm; and A/P, 4.6 mm), and for EC they were L/R, 3.7 mm; S/I, 3.3 mm; and A/P, 4.6 mm. In the absence of image guidance, the CB slightly outperformed the EC in precision. CBCT allows reduction to a single immobilization system that can be chosen for efficiency, logistics, and cost. Image guidance allows for increased geometric precision and accuracy and supports a corresponding reduction in PTV margin.

A randomized crossover study evaluating two immobilization devices for prostate cancer treatment

Purpose: To compare the Combifix® immobilization device with a conventional double-leg cushion in terms of patient comfort, therapist feedback and systematic/random error outcomes.

Materials and Methods: This prospective block-randomised crossover study enrolled 18 high-risk prostate cancer patients who received whole pelvic plus prostate radiotherapy. Treatment consisted of a prostate boost with one immobilization device followed by whole pelvic radiation using the other device. Our primary endpoints were device ease-of-use and patient comfort. Secondary endpoints included treatment time and systematic/random error assessments.

Results: While our patients found both devices equally comfortable and easy to use, the therapists preferred the leg cushion for ease of set-up (p = 0.04). Patient treatment time was similar for the two devices. In terms of electronic portal imaging (EPID)-based isocentre shifts, statistically, but not clinically, significant differences in systematic and random errors between the two devices exist in the superior–inferior directions (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions: No clinically important advantage was seen with the Combifix® device versus our standard double-leg cushion in terms of patient/therapist preference, patient comfort, and bony pelvic immobilization. However, this research project confirmed the feasibility of mounting a small single-institution randomised crossover technology assessment related to a practical radiotherapy issue.

Accuracy and reproducibility of conformal radiotherapy using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397)

Aims

The MRC RT01 trial used conformal radiotherapy to the prostate, a method that reduces the volume of normal tissue treated by 40–50%. Because of the risk of geographical miss, the trial used portal imaging to examine whether treatment delivery was within the required accuracy.

Material and methods

In total, 843 patients were randomly assigned to receive 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 6.5 weeks or 74 Gy in 37 fractions over 7.5 weeks. Field displacements and corrections were recorded for all imaged fractions. Displacement trends and their association with time, disease and treatment set-up characteristics were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. A Radiographer Trial Implementation Group (RTIG) was set up to inform the quality assurance process and to promote the development of best practice.

Results

Treatment isocentre positioning was within 5 mm in every direction on 6238 (83%) of the 7535 fractions imaged. In total, 532 (81%) of 695 included patients had at least one ≥ 3mm displacement and 415 (63%) had at least one ≥ 5mm displacement. Univariate, multivariate and stepwise models of ≥ 5mm displacements showed an increased likelihood of displacement in weeks 1 and 2 with low melting point alloy (LMPA) blocks compared with multileaf collimators, film verification compared with electronic portal imaging (EPI) and increased number of fractions imaged. Except for LMPA, this was also seen for ≥ 5mm displacements in weeks 3–6.

Conclusions

Accurate conformal treatment was delivered. The use of EPI was associated with increased reported accuracy. The RTIG was a crucial part of the quality assurance process.

Body mass index and prostate-specific antigen failure following brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Increasing body mass index (BMI) is associated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). We investigated whether BMI is associated with PSA failure in men treated with brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analyses were conducted on 374 patients undergoing brachytherapy for stage T1c-T2cNXM0 prostate cancer from 1996-2001. Forty-nine patients (13%) received supplemental EBRT and 131 (35%) received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Height and weight data were available for 353 (94%). Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between BMI and PSA failure (nadir + 2 ng/ml definition). Covariates included age, race, preimplantation PSA, Gleason score, T category, percent of prescription dose to 90% of the prostate, use of supplemental EBRT, and ADT.

RESULTS

Median age, PSA, and BMI were 66 years (range, 42-80 years), 5.7 ng/ml (range, 0.4-22.6 ng/ml), and 27.1 kg/m(2) (range, 18.2-53.6 kg/m(2)), respectively. After a median follow-up of 6.0 years (range, 3.0-10.2 years), there were 76 PSA recurrences. The BMI was not associated with PSA failure. Six-year PSA failure rates were 30.2% for men with BMI less than 25 kg/m(2), 19.5% for BMI of 25 or greater to less than 30 kg/m(2), and 14.4% for BMI of 30 kg/m(2) or greater (p = 0.19). Results were similar when BMI was analyzed as a continuous variable, using alternative definitions of PSA failure, and excluding patients treated with EBRT and/or ADT. In multivariate analyses, only baseline PSA was significantly associated with shorter time to PSA failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.20; p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike after surgery or EBRT, BMI is not associated with PSA failure in men treated with brachytherapy for prostate cancer. This raises the possibility that brachytherapy may be a preferred treatment strategy in obese patients.

Obesity and mortality in men with locally advanced prostate cancer: analysis of RTOG 85-31

BACKGROUND

Greater body mass index (BMI) is associated with shorter time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure following radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy (RT). Whether BMI is associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) was investigated in a large randomized trial of men treated with RT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for locally advanced prostate cancer.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 1992, 945 eligible men with locally advanced prostate cancer were enrolled in a phase 3 trial (RTOG 85-31) and randomized to RT and immediate goserelin or RT alone followed by goserelin at recurrence. Height and weight data were available at baseline for 788 (83%) subjects. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relations between BMI and all-cause mortality, PCSM, and nonprostate cancer mortality. Covariates included age, race, treatment arm, history of prostatectomy, nodal involvement, Gleason score, clinical stage, and BMI.

RESULTS

The 5-year PCSM rate for men with BMI <25 kg/m(2) was 6.5%, compared with 13.1% and 12.2% in men with BMI > or =25 to <30 and BMI > or =30, respectively (Gray's P = .005). In multivariate analyses, greater BMI was significantly associated with higher PCSM (for BMI > or =25 to <30, hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.27, P = .04; for BMI > or =30, HR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.01-2.66, P = .04). BMI was not associated with nonprostate cancer or all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater baseline BMI is independently associated with higher PCSM in men with locally advanced prostate cancer. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the mechanism(s) for increased cancer-specific mortality and to assess whether weight loss after prostate cancer diagnosis alters disease course.

Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy

The limited ability to control for the location of a tumour compromises the accuracy with which radiation can be delivered to tumour-bearing tissue. The resultant requirement for larger treatment volumes to accommodate target uncertainty restricts the radiation dose because more surrounding normal tissue is exposed. With image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) these volumes can be optimized and tumoricidal doses can be delivered, achieving maximal tumour control with minimal complications. Moreover, with the ability of high-precision dose delivery and real-time knowledge of the target volume location, IGRT has initiated the exploration of new indications for radiotherapy, some of which were previously considered infeasible.

Is a 3-mm intrafractional margin sufficient for daily image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer?

PURPOSE

To determine whether a 3-mm isotropic target margin adequately covers the prostate and seminal vesicles (SVs) during administration of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment fraction, assuming that daily image-guided setup is performed just before each fraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In-room computed tomographic (CT) scans were acquired immediately before and after a daily treatment fraction in 46 patients with prostate cancer. An eight-field IMRT plan was designed using the pre-fraction CT with a 3-mm margin and subsequently recalculated on the post-fraction CT. For convenience of comparison, dose plans were scaled to full course of treatment (75.6 Gy). Dose coverage was assessed on the post-treatment CT image set.

RESULTS

During one treatment fraction (21.4+/-5.5 min), there were reductions in the volumes of the prostate and SVs receiving the prescribed dose (median reduction 0.1% and 1.0%, respectively, p<0.001) and in the minimum dose to 0.1 cm(3) of their volumes (median reduction 0.5 and 1.5 Gy, p<0.001). Of the 46 patients, three patients' prostates and eight patients' SVs did not maintain dose coverage above 70 Gy. Rectal filling correlated with decreased percentage-volume of SV receiving 75.6, 70, and 60 Gy (p<0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-mm intrafractional margin was adequate for prostate dose coverage. However, a significant subset of patients lost SV dose coverage. The rectal volume change significantly affected SV dose coverage. For advanced-stage prostate cancers, we recommend to use larger margins or improve organ immobilization (such as with a rectal balloon) to ensure SV coverage.

Influence of body mass index on prostate-specific antigen failure after androgen suppression and radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Increasing body mass index (BMI) is associated with shorter time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after radical prostatectomy. Whether BMI is associated with time to PSA failure was investigated in men treated with androgen suppression therapy (AST) and radiation therapy (RT) for clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

The observational prospective cohort study consisted of 102 men with clinically localized prostate cancer who received 70 Gy RT with 6 months of AST on a single arm of a randomized trial between December 1995 and April 2001. Height and weight data were available at baseline for 99 (97%) of the men, from which BMI was calculated. Adjusting for age (continuous) and known prognostic factors including PSA level (continuous), Gleason score, and T-category, Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze whether BMI (continuous) was associated with time to PSA failure (PSA >1.0 ng/mL and increasing >0.2 ng/mL on 2 consecutive visits).

RESULTS

Median age and median BMI (interquartile range [IQR]) at baseline was 72 (69.1-74.7) years and 27.4 (24.8-30.7) kg/m,(2) respectively. In addition to an increasing PSA level (P = .006) and Gleason 8-10 cancer (P = .024), after a median follow-up (IQR) of 6.9 (5.6-8.5) years, an increasing BMI was also significantly associated with a shorter time to PSA failure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.19; P = .026) after RT and AST.

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for known prognostic factors, baseline BMI is significantly associated with time to PSA failure after RT and AST for men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Further study is warranted to assess the impact of an increasing BMI after AST administration on PSA failure, prostate cancer-specific, and all-cause mortality.

Image-guided radiation therapy: current and future directions

Since its discovery, ionizing radiation has been a cornerstone of cancer treatment. In step with technological advances, radiation therapy has strived to increase its therapeutic ratio. With the advent of 3D and cross-sectional imaging, and the ability to modulate the radiation beam, the current age of radiation oncology was initiated, promising better tumor control rates with fewer side effects. However, these ever more precise and conformal treatments have also revealed the importance of accounting for organ and tumor motion. Efforts to understand and compensate for the uncertainties caused by movement are required to ensure accurate conformal radiation therapy. This review will explore the current and future directions of image-guided radiation therapy, whose goal is to increase the accuracy of radiotherapy.

A gradient feature weighted Minimax algorithm for registration of multiple portal images to 3DCT volumes in prostate radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To develop an accurate, fast, and robust algorithm for registering portal and computed tomographic (CT) images for radiotherapy using a combination of sparse and dense field data that complement each other.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Gradient Feature Weighted Minimax (GFW Minimax) method was developed to register multiple portal images to three-dimensional CT images. Its performance was compared with that of three others: Minimax, Mutual Information, and Gilhuijs' method. Phantom and prostate cancer patient images were used. Effects of registration errors on tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were investigated as a relative measure.

RESULTS

Registration of four portals to CTs resulted in 30% lower error when compared with registration with two portals. Computation time increased by nearly 50%. GFW Minimax performed the best, followed by Gilhuijs' method, the Minimax method, and Mutual Information.

CONCLUSIONS

Using four portals instead of two lowered the registration error. Reduced fields of view images with full feature sets gave similar results in shorter times as full fields of view images. In clinical situations where soft tissue targets are of importance, GFW Minimax algorithm was significantly more accurate and robust. With registration errors lower than 1 mm, margins may be scaled down to 4 mm without adversely affecting TCP and NTCP.

Importing measured field fluences into the treatment planning system to validate a breathing synchronized DMLC-IMRT irradiation technique

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recalculating dose distributions using measured IMRT fluence fields imported into the treatment planning system (TPS) to evaluate the technical feasibility of a prototype developed for breathing synchronized irradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DMLC-IMRT fluence patterns acquired on radiographic film, generated by the linac in non-gated and gated mode, have been imported into the TPS. The effect of dose blurring and possible interplay between organ motion and leaf motion, and the efficacy of a breathing synchronized irradiation technique (an adapted version of a commercially available image-guidance system: NOVALIS BODY/ExacTrac4.0, BrainLAB AG) have been evaluated using radiographic film mounted to a simple phantom simulating a breathing pattern of 16 cycles per minute and covering a distance of 4 cm to obtain the resulting fluence maps. Two situations have been investigated to illustrate this principle: (a) a tumor located close to the diaphragm to assess the influence of organ motion on the dose to the target volume as well as to the gastro-intestinal tract that presents a high risk at intersecting with the beam during the breathing cycle. (b) A mediastinal lesion requiring complicated fluence patterns.

RESULTS

Importing measured fluence maps yielded highly disturbed reconstructed dose distributions in case of the non-gated delivery with the phantom in motion (both orthogonal and parallel to the leaf direction), whereas the measurements from the static (film fixed in space) and the gated delivery showed good agreement with the original theoretical dose distribution. These findings have been confirmed by the dose-volume histograms, corresponding tumor control probabilities, conformity index and dose heterogeneity values. The normal tissue complication probabilities investigated in this study seem to be affected to a lesser degree, which concurs with the observation that the motion effects result in a dose spread in the direction of motion. The applied breathing synchronization technique introduced an increased treatment time with a factor 3-4.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of measured fluence fields, delivered by the linac in non-gated and gated mode, as imported fluence maps for the treatment planning system is an interesting quality assurance tool and revealed the dramatic impact of dose blurring and interplay between DMLC-IMRT dose delivery and organ motion, as well as the potential of breathing synchronization to resolve this issue. The possible advantage of breathing synchronized irradiation is compromised with an increased treatment time.

The potential impact of the tension of the pelvic muscles on set-up errors in radiotherapy for pelvic malignancies

The purpose of the study reported here was to evaluate the potential impact of the tension of pelvic muscles on set-up errors. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with rectal cancer were included. The treatment simulation of the lateral beam in prone position was performed twice-with relaxed and next with maximally tense pelvic muscles. During the second simulation, the couch was moved so as to align the centre of the beam with the actual position of the skin mark tattooed during the first simulation. The bony landmarks on both images of corresponding lateral fields were matched. The beam's centre displacement and the rotation were measured using the beam image taken in relaxed position as a reference. The absolute values were used in calculation of the mean. For the anterior-posterior direction, the mean value of displacements was 15.3 mm, standard deviation (SD) 6.9 mm and the maximal value 37 mm. For the cranial-caudal direction, the mean value was 4.4 mm, SD 4 mm and the maximal value 17 mm. The mean rotation of the pelvis was 5.3 degrees, SD 2.4 degrees and maximal rotation 11 degrees. The majority of displacements were in the posterior (86%) and caudal (55%) directions. The majority of rotations were clockwise (76%). It was shown that pelvic muscle tension was the reason for anal verge displacements and mispositionings of the shielding block. This results in set-up inaccuracy, especially in the anterior-posterior direction, shielding block mispositioning and anal verge displacement.

Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer by CT–linear accelerator combination: Prostate movements and dosimetric considerations

PURPOSE

Multiple studies have indicated that the prostate is not stationary and can move as much as 2 cm. Such prostate movements are problematic for intensity-modulated radiotherapy, with its associated tight margins and dose escalation. Because of these intrinsic daily uncertainties, a relative generous "margin" is necessary to avoid marginal misses. Using the CT-linear accelerator combination in the treatment suite (Primatom, Siemens), we found that the daily intrinsic prostate movements can be easily corrected before each radiotherapy session. Dosimetric calculations were performed to evaluate the amount of discrepancy of dose to the target if no correction was done for prostate movement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Primatom consists of a Siemens Somatom CT scanner and a Siemens Primus linear accelerator installed in the same treatment suite and sharing a common table/couch. The patient is scanned by the CT scanner, which is movable on a pair of horizontal rails. During scanning, the couch does not move. The exact location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum are identified and localized. These positions are then compared with the planned positions. The daily movement of the prostate and rectum were corrected for and a new isocenter derived. The patient was treated immediately using the new isocenter.

RESULTS

Of the 108 patients with primary prostate cancer studied, 540 consecutive daily CT scans were performed during the last part of the cone down treatment. Of the 540 scans, 46% required no isocenter adjustments for the AP-PA direction, 54% required a shift of > or =3 mm, 44% required a shift of >5 mm, and 15% required a shift of >10 mm. In the superoinferior direction, 27% required a shift of >3 mm, 25% required a shift of >5 mm, and 4% required a shift of >10 mm. In the right-left direction, 34% required a shift of >3 mm, 24% required a shift of >5 mm, and 5% required a shift of >10 mm. Dosimetric calculations for a typical case of prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy with 5-mm margin coverage from the clinical target volume (prostate gland) was performed. With a posterior shift of 10 mm for the prostate, the dose coverage dropped from 95-107% to 71-100% coverage.

CONCLUSION

We have described a technique that corrects for the daily prostate motion, allowing for extremely precise prostate cancer treatment. This technique has significant implications for dose escalation and for decreasing rectal complications in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Impact of knee support and shape of tabletop on rectum and prostate position

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of different tabletops with or without a knee support on the position of the rectum, prostate, and bulb of the penis; and to evaluate the effect of these patient-positioning devices on treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 10 male volunteers, five MRI scans were made in four different positions: on a flat tabletop with knee support, on a flat tabletop without knee support, on a rounded tabletop with knee support, and on a rounded tabletop without knee support. The fifth scan was in the same position as the first. With image registration, the position differences of the rectum, prostate, and bulb of the penis were measured at several points in a sagittal plane through the central axis of the prostate. A planning target volume was generated from the delineated prostates with a margin of 10 mm in three dimensions. A three-field treatment plan with a prescribed dose of 78 Gy to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements point was automatically generated from each planning target volume. Dose-volume histograms were calculated for all rectal walls.

RESULTS

The shape of the tabletop did not affect the rectum and prostate position. Addition of a knee support shifted the anterior and posterior rectal walls dorsally. For the anterior rectal wall, the maximum dorsal shift was 9.9 mm (standard error of the mean [SEM] 1.7 mm) at the top of the prostate. For the posterior rectal wall, the maximum dorsal shift was 10.2 mm (SEM 1.5 mm) at the middle of the prostate. Therefore, the rectal filling was pushed caudally when a knee support was added. The knee support caused a rotation of the prostate around the left-right axis at the apex (i.e., a dorsal rotation) by 5.6 degrees (SEM 0.8 degrees ) and shifts in the caudal and dorsal directions of 2.6 mm (SEM 0.4 cm) and 1.4 mm (SEM 0.6 mm), respectively. The position of the bulb of the penis was not influenced by the use of a knee support or rounded tabletop. The volume of the rectal wall receiving the same dose range (e.g., 40-75 Gy) was reduced by 3.5% (SEM 0.9%) when a knee support was added. No significant differences were observed between the first and fifth scan (flat tabletop with knee support) for all measured points, thereby excluding time trends.

CONCLUSIONS

The rectum and prostate were significantly shifted dorsally by the use of a knee support. The rectum shifted more than the prostate, resulting in a dose benefit compared with irradiation without knee support. The shape of the tabletop did not influence the rectum or prostate position.

High conformality radiotherapy in Europe: thirty-one centres participating in the quality assurance programme of the EORTC prostate trial 22991

Today, conformality in radiotherapy is at the centre of many investments in equipment and staffing. To estimate the current situation within the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) conformal radiotherapy trial for prostate cancer, a technology questionnaire was designed to assess whether participating centres can comply with the required radiotherapy procedures of EORTC trial 22991, where a high dose is prescribed to the prostate. Questions covered various items of computed tomography, data acquisition, treatment planning, delivery and verification. All centres (n=31) replied to the questionnaire. All generate beam's eye views and dose volume histograms. All, but two, centres use digitally reconstructed radiographs to display images. The vast majority of the centres perform at least weekly treatment verification and half have access to individual in vivo dosimetry. The results of the questionnaire indicate that participating centres have access to the equipment and apply the procedures that are essential for conformal prostate radiotherapy. The technology questionnaire is the first step in the extensive quality assurance programme dedicated to this high-tech radiotherapy trial.

Questionnaire based quality assurance for the RT01 trial of dose escalation in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer (ISRCTN 47772397)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In order to ensure the validity of the outcome of the Medical Research Council's 'RTO1 trial' of dose escalation in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer it was considered important that the quality of treatment delivery should meet an adequate standard across all contributing centres. A questionnaire was therefore devised to ensure that all aspects of the planning and delivery process were adequately covered.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The questionnaire considered each step in the planning and delivery process and drew the attention of the participants to the specific requirements of the trial. Before entering patients into the trial each participating centre had to complete the questionnaire and an outlining exercise (reported elsewhere).

RESULTS

It was not practicable to define a detailed universally acceptable protocol for the whole process of delivery of conformal radiotherapy, not least because of the different equipment available for planning and treatment in different centres. The questionnaire identified some areas of difference in practice between centres where there may be a need for the development of a consensus as to best practice, particularly in the area of patient set-up. Occasionally it was necessary to follow up responses to questions that had been misunderstood or inadequately answered, but in most cases these issues proved to be easily resolved.

CONCLUSIONS

The questionnaire proved to be a useful self-assessment tool as well as enabling the quality assurance group to ensure that the standards of the trial were being met. Subsequent follow-up visits confirmed the usefulness and validity of this self assessment process.

Clinical and physical quality assurance for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer

The implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with prostate cancer in daily routine has been elaborated at our department. Our quality assurance (QA) concept is one method to pave the way for initiating IMRT treatments for starting institutions. A clinical quality assurance (CQA) procedure has been set-up for all patients before and throughout the course of radiotherapy. Simultaneously medical physicists established a physical quality assurance (PQA) concept that has been followed for all patients as well. Alternative CQA and PQA procedures are discussed. The literature is reviewed and discussed with special respect to quality assurance in IMRT of prostate cancer patients.

Set-up improvement in head and neck radiotherapy using a 3D off-line EPID-based correction protocol and a customised head and neck support

PURPOSE

First, to investigate the set-up improvement resulting from the introduction of a customised head and neck (HN) support system in combination with a technologist-driven off-line correction protocol in HN radiotherapy. Second, to define margins for planning target volume definition, accounting for systematic and random set-up uncertainties.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 63 patients 498 treatment fractions were evaluated to develop and implement a 3D shrinking action level correction protocol. In the comparative study two different HN-supports were compared: a flexible 'standard HN-support' and a 'customised HN-support". For all three directions (x, y and z) random and systematic set-up deviations (1 S.D.) were measured.

RESULTS

The customised HN-support improves the patient positioning compared to the standard HN-support. The 1D systematic errors in the x, y and z directions were reduced from 2.2-2.3 mm to 1.2-2.0 mm (1 S.D.). The 1D random errors for the y and z directions were reduced from 1.6 and 1.6 mm to 1.1 and 1.0 mm (1S.D.). The correction protocol reduced the 1D systematic errors further to 0.8-1.1 mm (1 S.D.) and all deviations in any direction were within 5 mm. Treatment time per measured fraction was increased from 10 to 13 min. The total time required per patient, for the complete correction procedure, was approximately 40 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal imaging is a powerful tool in the evaluation of the department specific patient positioning procedures. The introduction of a comfortable customised HN-support, in combination with an electronic portal imaging device-based correction protocol, executed by technologists, led to an improvement of overall patient set-up. As a result, application of proposed recipes for CTV-PTV margins indicates that these can be reduced to 3-4 mm.

Treatment of localized prostate cancer using a combination of high dose rate Iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: initial Australian experience

Combination high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRB) and external beam radiation therapy is technically and clinically feasible as definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. We report the first large Australian experience using this technique of radiation dose escalation in 82 patients with intermediate- and high-risk disease. With a median follow up of 3 years (156 weeks), complications were low and overall prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival was 91% using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. The delivery of hypofractionated radiation through the HDRB component shortens overall treatment time and is both biologically and logistically advantageous. As a radiation boost strategy, HDRB is easy to learn and could be introduced into most facilities with brachytherapy capability.

Patient setup error measurement using 3D intensity-based image registration techniques

PURPOSE

Conformal radiotherapy requires accurate patient positioning with reference to the initial three-dimensional (3D) CT image. Patient setup is controlled by comparison with portal images acquired immediately before patient treatment. Several automatic methods have been proposed, generally based on segmentation procedures. However, portal images are of very low contrast, leading to segmentation inaccuracies. In this study, we propose an intensity-based (with no segmentation), fully automatic, 3D method, associating two portal images and a 3D CT scan to estimate patient setup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images of an anthropomorphic phantom were used. A CT scan of the pelvic area was first acquired, then the phantom was installed in seven positions. The process is a 3D optimization of a similarity measure in the space of rigid transformations. To avoid time-consuming digitally reconstructed radiograph generation at each iteration, we used two-dimensional transformations and two sets of specific and pregenerated digitally reconstructed radiographs. We also propose a technique for computing intensity-based similarity measures between several couples of images. A correlation coefficient, chi-square, mutual information, and correlation ratio were used.

RESULTS

The best results were obtained with the correlation ratio. The median root mean square error was 2.0 mm for the seven positions tested and was, respectively, 3.6, 4.4, and 5.1 for correlation coefficient, chi-square, and mutual information.

CONCLUSIONS

Full 3D analysis of setup errors is feasible without any segmentation step. It is fast and accurate and could therefore be used before each treatment session. The method presents three main advantages for clinical implementation-it is fully automatic, applicable to all tumor sites, and requires no additional device.

Feasibility of geometrical verification of patient set-up using body contours and computed tomography data

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Body contours can potentially be used for patient set-up verification in external-beam radiotherapy and might enable more accurate set-up of patients prior to irradiation. The aim of this study is to test the feasibility of patient set-up verification using a body contour scanner.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Body contour scans of 33 lung cancer and 21 head-and-neck cancer patients were acquired on a simulator. We assume that this dataset is representative for the patient set-up on an accelerator. Shortly before acquisition of the body contour scan, a pair of orthogonal simulator images was taken as a reference. Both the body contour scan and the simulator images were matched in 3D to the planning computed tomography scan. Movement of skin with respect to bone was quantified based on an analysis of variance method.

RESULTS

Set-up errors determined with body-contours agreed reasonably well with those determined with simulator images. For the lung cancer patients, the average set-up errors (mm)+/-1 standard deviation (SD) for the left-right, cranio-caudal and anterior-posterior directions were 1.2+/-2.9, -0.8+/-5.0 and -2.3+/-3.1 using body contours, compared to -0.8+/-3.2, -1.0+/-4.1 and -1.2+/-2.4 using simulator images. For the head-and-neck cancer patients, the set-up errors were 0.5+/-1.8, 0.5+/-2.7 and -2.2+/-1.8 using body contours compared to -0.4+/-1.2, 0.1+/-2.1, -0.1+/-1.8 using simulator images. The SD of the set-up errors obtained from analysis of the body contours were not significantly different from those obtained from analysis of the simulator images. Movement of the skin with respect to bone (1 SD) was estimated at 2.3 mm for lung cancer patients and 1.7 mm for head-and-neck cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of patient set-up using a body-contouring device is possible. The accuracy, however, is limited by the movement of the skin with respect to the bone. In situations where the error in the patient set-up is relatively large, it is possible to reduce these errors using a computer-aided set-up technique based on contour information.

Clinical use of stereoscopic X-ray positioning of patients treated with conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate accuracy and time requirements of a stereoscopic X-ray-based positioning system in patients receiving conformal radiotherapy to the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Setup errors of the isocenter with regard to the bony pelvis were measured by means of orthogonal verification films and compared to conventional positioning (using skin drawings and lasers) and infrared marker (IR) based positioning in each of 261 treatments. In each direction, the random error represents the standard deviation and the systematic error the absolute value of the mean position. Time measurements were done in 75 treatments.

RESULTS

Random errors with the X-ray positioning system in the anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and longitudinal direction were (average +/- 1 standard deviation) 2 +/- 0.6 mm, 1.7 +/- 0.6 mm, and 2.4 +/- 0.7 mm. The corresponding values of conventional as well as IR positioning were significantly higher (p < 0.01). Systematic errors for X-ray positioning were 1.1 +/- 1.2 mm AP, 0.6 +/- 0.5 mm laterally, and 1.5 +/- 1.6 mm longitudinally. Conventional and IR marker-based positioning showed significantly larger systematic errors AP and laterally, but longitudinally, the difference was not significant. Depending on the axis looked at, errors of >or=5 mm occurred in 2%-14% of treatments after X-ray positioning, 13%-29% using IR markers, and 28%-53% with conventional positioning. Total linac time for one treatment session was 14 min 51 s +/- 4 min 18 s, half of which was used for the X-ray-assisted positioning procedure.

CONCLUSION

X-ray-assisted patient positioning significantly improves setup accuracy, at the cost of an increased treatment time.

The use of a leg holder immobilisation device in 3D-conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a leg holder immobilisation device on patient positioning accuracy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients of similar age and stage of disease treated with curative external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer were included prospectively. Ten patients were sequentially allocated to one of the two groups, and treated either with or without a leg holder. Treatment set-up alignment accuracy was assessed with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).

RESULTS

Set-up accuracy was 0.3, 0.3 and 0.2 cm for patients with a leg holder, and 0.3, 0.4 and 0.2 cm for patients without a leg holder in the cranio-caudal, anterior-posterior and in the lateral positions, respectively. The difference is not significant. The repositioning accuracy of combined (sagittal and lateral) in-plane rotations on the other hand, was significantly improved with a leg holder device (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Set-up accuracy can be improved using a leg holder immobilisation device in terms of rotational movement accuracy, thus making on-line corrections more accurate using EPID in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions

PURPOSE

To quantify three-dimensional (3D) movement of the prostate gland with the patient in the supine and prone positions and to analyze the movement frequency for each treatment position.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy (RTRT) system was developed to identify the 3D position of a 2-mm gold marker implanted in the prostate 30 times/s using two sets of fluoroscopic images. The linear accelerator was triggered to irradiate the tumor only when the gold marker was located within the region of the planned coordinates relative to the isocenter. Ten patients with prostate cancer treated with RTRT were the subjects of this study. The coordinates of the gold marker were recorded every 0.033 s during RTRT in the supine treatment position for 2 min. The patient was then moved to the prone position, and the marker was tracked for 2 min to acquire data regarding movement in this position. Measurements were taken 5 times for each patient (once a week); a total of 50 sets for the 10 patients was analyzed. The raw data from the RTRT system were filtered to reduce system noise, and the amplitude of movement was then calculated. The discrete Fourier transform of the unfiltered data was performed for the frequency analysis of prostate movement.

RESULTS

No apparent difference in movement was found among individuals. The amplitude of 3D movement was 0.1-2.7 mm in the supine and 0.4-24 mm in the prone positions. The amplitude in the supine position was statistically smaller in all directions than that in the prone position (p < 0.0001). The amplitude in the craniocaudal and AP directions was larger than in the left-right direction in the prone position (p < 0.0001). No characteristic movement frequency was detected in the supine position. The respiratory frequency was detected for all patients regarding movement in the craniocaudal and AP directions in the prone position. The results of the frequency analysis suggest that prostate movement is affected by the respiratory cycle and is influenced by bowel movement in the prone position.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study have confirmed that internal organ motion is less frequent in the supine position than in the prone position in the treatment of prostate cancer. RTRT would be useful in reducing uncertainty due to the effects of the respiratory cycle, especially in the prone position.

Initial clinical experience with infrared-reflecting skin markers in the positioning of patients treated by conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate an infrared (IR) marker-based positioning system in patients receiving conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

During 553 treatments, the ability of the IR system to automatically position the isocenter was recorded. Setup errors were measured by means of orthogonal verification films and compared to conventional positioning (using skin drawings and lasers) in 184 treatments.

RESULTS

The standard deviation of anteroposterior (AP) and lateral setup errors was significantly reduced with IR marker positioning compared to conventional: 2 vs. 4.8 mm AP (p < 0.01) and 1.6 vs. 3.5 mm laterally (p < 0.01). Longitudinally, the difference was not significant (3.5 vs. 3.0 mm). Systematic errors were on the average smaller AP and laterally for the IR method: 4.1 vs. 7.8 mm AP (p = 0.01) and 3.1 vs. 5.6 mm lateral (p = 0.07). Longitudinally, the IR system resulted in somewhat larger systematic errors: 5.0 vs. 3.4 mm for conventional positioning (p = 0.03). The use of an off-line correction protocol, based on the average deviation measured over the first four fractions, allowed virtual elimination of systematic errors. Inability of the IR system to correctly locate the markers, leading to an executional failure, occurred in 21% of 553 fractions.

CONCLUSION

IR marker-assisted patient positioning significantly improves setup accuracy along the AP and lateral axes. Executional failures need to be reduced.

Positioning errors and prostate motion during conformal prostate radiotherapy using on-line isocentre set-up verification and implanted prostate markers

PURPOSE

To evaluate treatment errors from set-up and inter-fraction prostatic motion with port films and implanted prostate fiducial markers during conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Errors from isocentre positioning and inter-fraction prostate motion were investigated in 13 men treated with escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. To limit the effect of inter-fraction prostate motion, patients were planned and treated with an empty rectum and a comfortably full bladder, and were instructed regarding dietary management, fluid intake and laxative use. Field placement was determined and corrected with daily on-line portal imaging. A lateral portal film was taken three times weekly over the course of therapy. From these films, random and systematic placement errors were measured by matching corresponding bony landmarks to the simulator film. Superior-inferior and anterior-posterior prostate motion was measured from the displacement of three gold pins implanted into the prostate before planning. A planning target volume (PTV) was derived to account for the measured prostate motion and field placement errors.

RESULTS

From 272 port films the random and systematic isocentre positioning error was 2.2 mm (range 0.2-7.3 mm) and 1.4 mm (range 0.2-3.3 mm), respectively. Prostate motion was largest at the base compared to the apex. Base: anterior, standard deviation (SD) 2.9 mm; superior, SD 2.1 mm. Apex: anterior, SD 2.1 mm; superior, SD 2.1 mm. The margin of PTV required to give a 99% probability of the gland remaining within the 95% isodose line during the course of therapy is superior 5.8 mm, and inferior 5.6 mm. In the anterior and posterior direction, this margin is 7.2 mm at the base, 6.5 mm at the mid-gland and 6.0 mm at the apex.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic set-up errors were small using real-time isocentre placement corrections. Patient instruction to help control variation in bladder and rectal distension during therapy may explain the observed small SD for prostate motion in this group of patients. Inter-fraction prostate motion remained the largest source of treatment error, and observed motion was greatest at the gland base. In the absence of real-time pre-treatment imaging of prostate position, sequential portal films of implanted prostatic markers should improve quality assurance by confirming organ position within the treatment field over the course of therapy.

A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new off-line patient setup correction protocol that minimizes the required number of portal images and perform a comparison with currently applied protocols.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We compared two types of off-line protocols: (a) the widely applied shrinking action level (SAL) protocol, in which the setup error, averaged over the measured treatment fractions, is compared with a threshold that decreases with the number of measurements, to decide if a correction is necessary; and (b) a new "no-action-level" (NAL) protocol, which simply calculates the mean setup error over a fixed number of fractions, and always corrects for it. The performance of the protocols was evaluated by applying them to (a) a database of measured setup errors from 600 prostate patients (with, on average, 10 imaged fractions/patient) and (b) Monte Carlo-generated setup error distributions for various values of the population systematic and random errors.

RESULTS

The NAL protocol achieved a significantly higher accuracy than the SAL protocol for a similar workload in terms of image acquisition and analysis, as well as in setup corrections. The SAL protocol required approximately three times more images than the NAL protocol to obtain the same reduction of systematic errors. Application of the NAL protocol to measured setup errors confirmed its efficacy in systematic error reduction in a real patient population.

CONCLUSION

The NAL protocol performed much more efficiently than the SAL protocol for both actually measured and simulated setup data. The resulting decrease in required portal images not only reduces workload, but also dose to healthy tissue, if dedicated large fields are required for portal imaging (double exposure).

Effectiveness of couch height-based patient set-up and an off-line correction protocol in prostate cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate set-up improvement caused by applying a couch height-based patient set-up method in combination with a technologist-driven off-line correction protocol in nonimmobilized radiotherapy of prostate patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A three-dimensional shrinking action level correction protocol is applied in two consecutive patient cohorts with different set-up methods: the traditional "laser set-up" group (n = 43) and the "couch height set-up" group (n = 112). For all directions, left-right, ventro-dorsal, and cranio-caudal, random and systematic set-up deviations were measured.

RESULTS

The couch height set-up method improves the patient positioning compared to the laser set-up method. Without application of the correction protocol, both systematic and random errors reduced to 2.2-2.4 mm (1 SD) and 1.7-2.2 mm (1 SD), respectively. By using the correction protocol, systematic errors reduced further to 1.3-1.6 mm (1 SD). One-dimensional deviations were within 5 mm for >90% of the measured fractions. The required number of corrections per patient in the off-line correction protocol was reduced significantly during the course of treatment from 1.1 to 0.6 by the couch height set-up method. The treatment time was not prolonged by application of the correction protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The couch height set-up method improves the set-up significantly, especially in the ventro-dorsal direction. Combination of this set-up method with an off-line correction strategy, executed by technologists, reduces the number of set-up corrections required.

Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice

In this review of current clinical practice of set-up error verification by means of portal imaging, we firstly define the various types of set-up errors using a consistent nomenclature. The different causes of set-up errors are then summarized. Next, the results of a large number of studies regarding patient set-up verification are presented for treatments of patients with head and neck, prostate, pelvis, lung and breast cancer, as well as for mantle field/total body treatments. This review focuses on the more recent studies in order to assess the criteria for good clinical practice in patient positioning. The reported set-up accuracy varies widely, depending on the treatment site, method of immobilization and institution. The standard deviation (1 SD, mm) of the systematic and random errors for currently applied treatment techniques, separately measured along the three principle axes, ranges from 1.6-4.6 and 1.1-2.5 (head and neck), 1.0-3.8 and 1.2-3.5 (prostate), 1.1-4.7 and 1.1-4.9 (pelvis), 1.8-5.1 and 2.2-5.4 (lung), and 1.0-4.7 and 1.7-14.4 (breast), respectively. Recommendations for procedures to quantify, report and reduce patient set-up errors are given based on the studies described in this review. Using these recommendations, the systematic and random set-up errors that can be achieved in routine clinical practice can be less than 2.0 mm (1 SD) for head and neck, 2.5 mm (1 SD) for prostate, 3.0 mm (1 SD) for general pelvic and 3.5 mm (1 SD) for lung cancer treatment techniques.

Patient positioning using detailed three-dimensional surface data for patients undergoing conformal radiation therapy for carcinoma of the prostate: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

The increasing complexity of radiotherapy highlights the need for accurate setup. This paper assesses the potential of position corrections, derived from the three-dimensional (3D) surface of the patient, in reducing positioning errors in patients undergoing conformal radiation therapy of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty patients undergoing conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer had planning computed tomography (CT) scans and then weekly treatment CT scans over the course of their treatment. Patients were positioned on the CT table using three coplanar tattoo marks used for patient setup on the accelerator. Surfaces were computed from the planning CT (planning surface), and the treatment CT (treatment surfaces). Using a surface matching utility, the planning and treatment 3D surfaces were compared. The prostate was implicitly localized based on surface matching of the external contour and by matching the bony anatomy. The resultant prostate displacement after correction was assessed for the two localization methods.

RESULTS

Correcting patient position via the surface comparisons reduced the standard deviation of prostate displacement with respect to the patient isocenter in the lateral and anterior/posterior directions. In the lateral direction, prostate and surface motion was highly correlated (r = 0.96). In the anterior/posterior direction the corrections from the surface data were as effective as those derived from the bony anatomy.

CONCLUSION

Detailed surface data can aid the positioning of patients receiving conformal radiation therapy to the prostate by reducing the displacement of the target from the intended treatment position. This study shows that surface corrections can be as effective as those derived from bony anatomy, and may be exploited where definition of bony anatomy is difficult.

A prospective comparison of three systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The study compared the setup reliability of 3 patient immobilization systems, a rubber leg cushion, the alpha cradle, and the thermoplastic Hipfix device, in 77 patients with cT1-T3, N0, M0 prostate cancer receiving conformal radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Port films were analyzed and compared to simulation films to estimate the setup errors in the three coordinate axes (anterior-posterior, cranial-caudal, medial-lateral). A total vector error was calculated from these shifts.

RESULTS

The Hipfix was found significantly superior to the other two devices in reducing mean setup errors in all axes (p < 0.005). The average field-positioning error with the Hipfix ranged from 1.9 mm to 2.6 mm for all axes, whereas the deviation for the other two systems ranged from 2.7 to 3. 4 mm. Errors greater than 10 mm were virtually eliminated with the Hipfix system. There was a reduction in the mean total vector error in the alpha cradle and Hipfix patient cohorts over time, reflecting improved efficacy as a result of experience.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant difference in the performance of each immobilization device. The Hipfix was consistently more reliable in reducing setup errors than the other devices.

[Immobilization devices in conformal radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer]

When considering three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, the uncertainties about treatment can be quite significant, due to set-up errors and organ or tumor motion. These can be important causes of treatment failure. Immobilization devices have only been studied recently in a scientific manner in the domain of chest tumors, presumably because other factors such as tumor motion were felt to be more important causes of treatment uncertainties. An international survey on immobilization devices in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has shown that about half of the centers are using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and among these, only two-thirds use immobilization devices on a routine basis. Very few use internal fiducials. Current data on set-up errors show that the average discrepancy is about 5 mm, but in some cases it can be more than 15 mm. A recent study has demonstrated that less positioning corrections during treatments were needed for the patients who were immobilized. Another work indicates that there were no differences between a T-bar immobilization device and a system using chemical foams. Other works indicate that internal motion of bronchial tumors can vary greatly, depending on their location. A number of clinical groups are looking at minimizing the consequences of internal motion, but the currently proposed techniques appear to be cumbersome. New studies will be necessary in order to improve the knowledge of daily positioning and the effect of internal motion. Until then, it is essential to take care when considering narrow margins in conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer.