The effects of amygdaloid stimulation on amphetamine-elicited locomotor sensitization

Cocaine pre-exposure enhances CRF-induced expression of c-fos mRNA in the central nucleus of the amygdala: an effect that parallels the effects of cocaine pre-exposure on CRF-induced locomotor activity

There is evidence that cocaine pre-exposure produces changes in the responsivity of central corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) systems and that these systems mediate some of the drug-related behavioural effects of acute stressors. The present experiment was conducted to assess the effects of repeated cocaine exposure on CRF-induced neuronal activation within two regions of the extended amygdala, the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and lateral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST). In addition, CRF-induced neuronal activation was compared with CRF-induced locomotor activity. Rats were injected for 7 days with cocaine (days 1 and 7 in test chambers; days 2-6 in homecages) or saline. After 10 drug-free days, locomotor responsiveness to intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections of CRF and Vehicle was assessed over 2-h test periods. Twenty-four to 48 h following testing for locomotor activity, animals were injected with either CRF or Vehicle, 30 min before being sacrificed. Subsequently, the brains were processed by in situ hybridization for c-fos mRNA, a widely used marker of neuronal activation, in the CeA and BNST. In CeA, i.c.v. CRF enhanced the expression of c-fos mRNA in cocaine, but not saline, pre-exposed animals; in the same animals, i.c.v. CRF resulted in enhanced locomotor activity in cocaine, but not saline, pre-exposed animals. The results demonstrate that repeated exposure to cocaine changes the neuronal response to CRF in the CeA; furthermore, they suggest that these changes in the CeA could potentially be of functional significance in the effects of repeated cocaine exposure on CRF-induced locomotor activity.

Extinction deficit and fear reinstatement after electrical stimulation of the amygdala: implications for kindling-associated fear and anxiety

Generalized seizures produced by electrical kindling of the amygdala in laboratory rats are a widely used animal model of temporal lobe epilepsy. In addition to seizure evolution amygdala kindling enhances emotionality. The relative roles of electrical stimulation and seizure induction in fear responding are unclear. Here we investigate this issue using extinction and reinstatement of fear-potentiated startle. After classical conditioning (light+footshock pairings) laboratory rats were fear extinguished with each light presentation followed by nonepileptogenic amygdala stimulation. In contrast to the normal extinction learning of control subjects, amygdala stimulated animals exhibited conditioned fear after 120 presentations of the nonreinforced conditioned stimulus (CS). In a second experiment electrical stimulation of the amygdala restored extinguished fear responding and the fear reinstatement was specific to extinction context. The reinstatement effect did not involve sensitized fear to the CS produced by amygdala stimulation. The possibility that electrical activation of the amygdala produces unconditioned fear was considered. Animals uniformly failed to demonstrate fear-potentiated startle using electrical stimulation of the amygdala as the unconditioned stimulus. This was the case with a subthreshold afterdischarge stimulus and a stimulation schedule that produced kindled seizures. The extinction deficit and fear reinstatement results were interpreted to suggest that amygdala stimulation activates acquired excitatory stimulus-affect neural connections formed during Pavlovian fear conditioning. Our data supports a model in which excitation of an amygdala-based memory-retrieval system reinforces the expression of learned fear behaviors.

Reinforcing versus anticonvulsant drugs: effects on intracranial self-stimulation rate-frequency M50 indices

Drugs of abuse, such as amphetamine and morphine, produce reward-related shifts on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds. The facilitatory effects on ICSS thresholds of drugs that act through the GABAergic system, however, are reported to be attributed to their antiseizure and anticonvulsant effects, rather than their reinforcing effects. Using a rate-frequency ICSS paradigm, we examined the effects of amphetamine (a reinforcing drug of abuse that acts via the catecholaminergic system), pentobarbital (a GABA(A) receptor agonist and reinforcing barbiturate with anticonvulsant properties), and gabapentin (a nonspecific GABAergic agonist and anticonvulsant with low abuse potential) on ICSS M(50) indices. All three doses of amphetamine (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg) and pentobarbital (2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg) significantly lowered rate-frequency M(50) values. Gabapentin, on the other hand, significantly raised rate-frequency M(50) values, albeit only at the highest dose administered (30 mg/kg). Our results indicate that shifts in ICSS M(50) values produced by pentobarbital are associated with the reinforcing, not the anticonvulsant, effect of pentobarbital. These results are consistent with the view that there is a common system underlying the reinforcing effects of drugs and ICSS reinforcement, and suggest that the reinforcing and anticonvulsant effects of GABA agonists are dissociable.

Signal transduction mechanisms and behavioral sensitization to stimulant drugs: an overview of cAMP and PLA2

Behavioral sensitization refers to the progressive increase of behavioral responses to psychomotor stimulants, which provides a model for the intensification of drug craving and relapse alleged to underlie addiction in humans. Mechanisms related to sensitization may also contribute to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. While the phenomenon has been observed for years, only recently have molecular or intracellular mechanisms associated with behavioral sensitization been studied. An overview of cAMP and PLA2 (intracellular, signal transduction mechanisms) relevant to behavioral sensitization will be presented.

Pharmacology and behavioral pharmacology of the mesocortical dopamine system

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) has long been known to be involved in the mediation of complex behavioral responses. Considerable research efforts are directed towards refining the knowledge about the function of this brain area and the role it plays in cognitive performance and behavioral output. In the first part, this review provides, from a pharmacological perspective, an overview of anatomical, electrophysiological and neurochemical aspects of the function of the PFC, with an emphasis on the mesocortical dopamine system. Anatomy of the mesocortical system, basic physiological and pharmacological properties of neurotransmission within the PFC, and interactions between dopamine and glutamate as well as other transmitters within the mesocorticolimbic circuit are included. The coverage of these data is largely restricted to what is relevant for the second part of the review which focuses on behavioral studies that have examined the role of the PFC in a variety of phenomena, behaviors and paradigms. These include reward and addiction, locomotor activity and sensitization, learning, cognition, and schizophrenia. Although the focus of this review is on the mesocortical dopamine system, given the intricate interactions of dopamine with other transmitter systems within the PFC and the importance of the PFC as a source of glutamate in subcortical areas, these aspects are also covered in some detail where appropriate. Naturally, a topic as complex as this cannot be covered comprehensively in its entirety. Therefore this review is largely limited to data derived from studies using rats, and it is also specifically restricted to data concerning the medial PFC (mPFC). Since in several fields of research the findings concerning the function or role of the mPFC are relatively inconsistent, the question is addressed whether these inconsistencies might, at least in part, be related to the anatomical and functional heterogeneity of this brain area.

Modification of behavioral responses induced by electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area in rats

To investigate the role of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), a source of the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway, in paranoid psychosis, a detailed analysis of the behavioral responses induced by electrical stimulation of the VTA was made. Abnormal behavior induced by bilateral high-frequency stimulation of the VTA consisted of two components: forward locomotion and exploration. Similar responses were obtained when the nucleus accumbens (NAC) or prefrontal cortex (PFC) were stimulated. The expression of behavioral responses to stimulation was significantly attenuated by dopamine (DA) receptor or antagonists, such as haloperidol, YM-09151-2 and SCH23390. These results indicate that VTA stimulation causes a transient hyperdopaminergic state in the brain, that resembles psychostimulant-induced abnormal behavior. The effects of chronic administration of methamphetamine (MAP) on the behavioral responses to electrical stimulation of the VAT were also investigated. Although an acute administration of MAP did not affect the behavioral responses to electrical stimulation of the VTA, chronic treatment with MAP (for 2 weeks) caused a long-lasting reduction in the electrical threshold for the induction of abnormal behavior, compared with chronic saline-treated rats. It is suggested that a lasting enhancement in the behavioral response to stimulation of VTA neurons may contribute to the etiology of paranoid schizophrenia and amphetamine psychosis.

Effects of quinpirole on central dopamine systems in sensitized and non-sensitized rats

The present study examined post mortem changes in central dopaminergic terminal regions following acute or chronic treatment regimens with the dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole, a psychomotor stimulant which induces pronounced behavioural sensitization when given chronically. Drug-induced changes in nucleus accumbens, striatum and amygdala were bilateral in nature, while in prefrontal cortex (medial prefrontal and anterior cingulate combined), left and right brain regions responded differentially to quinpirole. Acute drug treatment increased dopamine tissue levels in nucleus accumbens and right prefrontal cortex, while the dopamine metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, was decreased in amygdala. In contrast, sensitization to quinpirole was associated with decreased dopamine levels in left prefrontal cortex, and increases in 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid levels in subcortical structures, particularly striatum and amygdala. Additionally, the increase in striatal 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid in chronic quinpirole animals was independent of drug treatment on the final day of injections. In summary, quinpirole induces a variety of simultaneous, regional changes in dopaminergic function, with the sensitized condition being primarily associated with an up-regulation of subcortical dopamine activity. While the nucleus accumbens and striatum play a well known role in motor activation and sensitized behaviour, it is concluded that the amygdala and prefrontal cortex have significant modulatory influences on these processes, with the role of the prefrontal cortex being asymmetrical in nature. Given the suggested relevance of behavioural sensitization to psychopathological states in humans, parallels are drawn between the present data and clinical findings, particularly in relation to obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Dopaminergic sensitization: implications for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia

1. Which transmitters are primarily or secondarily involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia has been extensively studied during the last years. This review concentrates on the two systems, that most constantly have been found dysfunctioning in patients; that are the dopaminergic and glutamatergic systems. 2. Numerous neuropathological defects have been found in schizophrenia, but it is as yet unknown which changes are causative and which reflect maladaptive reactions. 3. All findings, however, involve the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuits, which are central for attention and information processing. 4. The article focuses on the consequence of transmitter dysfunction for perception and for the ability of the individual to adapt to a constantly changing environment. Both clinical and experimental studies point to a primary/early cortical defect involving the glutamatergic system, and to a later developed intermittent hyperactivity of the dopaminergic system superimposed on a basal hypodopaminergic state. 5. The authors have previously demonstrated, how it is possible to potentiate mesolimbic dopaminergic activity by intermittent electrical stimulations of the cells in the ventral tegmental area, and that influence on the central mesolimbic dopamine cells is essential for the strengthened neuroplastic response. A changed neuroplastic response to environmental stimulation due to dopaminergic sensitization can explain how an episodic, subcortical hyperactivity can act on a basic glutamatergic and dopaminergic hypofunction to produce psychotic symptoms. Based on our own and others clinical and experimental findings, the "filter" hypothesis for schizophrenia and the state-dependence of schizophrenic symptoms, the authors present a hypothesis for spontaneous mesolimbic dopaminergic sensitization and progressive evolution of psychosis.

Adrenocortical suppression blocks the memory-enhancing effects of amphetamine and epinephrine

This study examined glucocorticoid-adrenergic interactions in modulating acquisition and memory storage for inhibitory avoidance training. Systemically (s.c.) administered amphetamine (1 mg/kg), but not epinephrine (0.1 mg/kg) or the peripherally acting amphetamine derivative 4-OH amphetamine (2 mg/kg), given to rats shortly before training facilitated acquisition performance in a continuous multiple-trial inhibitory avoidance (CMIA) task. Adrenocortical suppression with the 11beta-hydroxylase inhibitor metyrapone (50 mg/kg; s.c.), given to rats 90 min before training, did not block the effect of amphetamine and did not affect acquisition performance of otherwise untreated animals. Retention of CMIA and one-trial inhibitory avoidance was enhanced by either pre- or posttraining injections of amphetamine as well as 4-OH amphetamine and epinephrine. The finding that injections of amphetamine and epinephrine have comparable effects on memory is consistent with the view that amphetamine may modulate memory storage, at least in part, by inducing the release of epinephrine from the adrenal medulla. Metyrapone pretreatment blocked the memory-enhancing effects of amphetamine, 4-OH amphetamine, and epinephrine but did not affect retention performance of otherwise untreated animals. Posttraining injections of different doses of epinephrine (ranging from 0.0001 to 1.0 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent memory enhancement for inhibitory avoidance training and metyrapone blocked the memory-enhancing effects of all these doses. These findings provide further evidence that the sympathoadrenal and adrenocortical systems are intimately coupled during processes of memory storage.

Effects of lesions of prefrontal cortex, amygdala, or fornix on behavioral sensitization to amphetamine: comparison with N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists

Behavioral sensitization to amphetamine involves the mesoaccumbens dopamine system and is accompanied by cellular changes in this system. Excitatory amino acid antagonists, when co-administered with amphetamine, prevent both behavioral sensitization and associated changes in the mesoaccumbens dopamine system. This suggests that excitatory amino acid-dependent events are critical to the initiation of sensitization. This study sought to identify excitatory amino acid projections required for sensitization, focusing on projections to the nucleus accumbens or ventral tegmental area. The major excitatory projections to the nucleus accumbens originate in the prefrontal cortex, amygdala and hippocampus. The prefrontal cortex and amygdala also send excitatory projections to the ventral tegmental area. Ibotenic acid lesions of the prefrontal cortex or amygdala and electrolytic lesions of the fornix were performed in rats. After one week of recovery, rats were treated with water or 2.5 mg/kg amphetamine for six days and challenged with amphetamine on day 8. Activity was tested in photobeam cages on days 1 and 8. On day 1, control and sham-lesioned rats exhibited stereotyped behaviors followed by a period of post-stereotypy locomotion. On day 8, sensitization was evident as an enhancement of both stereotypy and post-stereotypy locomotion. Co-administration of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists [MK-801 (dizocilpine maleate) or CGS 19755] with amphetamine prevented the development of sensitization of both stereotypy and post-stereotypy locomotion. Neither antagonist, however, prevented the expression of sensitization. None of the lesions completely mimicked these effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists. Lesions of hippocampal projections traveling in the fornix produced a general disinhibition of locomotor activity, but did not prevent sensitization of either stereotypy or post-stereotypy locomotion. Lesions of the prefrontal cortex failed to prevent sensitization of stereotypy was obtained following repeated amphetamine administration. However, like prefrontal cortical lesions, amygdala lesions prevented sensitization of post-stereotypy locomotion. When interpreted in the light of previous studies demonstrating the importance of the ventral tegmental area in the initiation of sensitization, the present results suggest a likely role for neuronal circuits involving the prefrontal cortex, amygdala and ventral tegmental area in the development of sensitization of post-stereotypy locomotion following repeated amphetamine administration. Such circuits may initiate sensitization through a mechanism involving excitatory amino acid regulation of the activity of mesoaccumbens dopamine neurons. Parallel circuits, involving other brain regions, may similarly contribute to sensitization of stereotyped behaviors.

Cocaine preexposure sensitizes conditioned fear in a potentiated acoustic startle paradigm

The consequences of chronic cocaine administration on fear-potentiated startle were evaluated in two experiments. Cocaine treatment (40 mg/kg) for 7 days prior to fear acquisition (light + shock pairings) had an attenuating influence on the ability of the conditioned stimulus (CS) to increase acoustic startle. When cocaine was administered in the context of the CS, following fear conditioning, a marked enhancement of potentiated startle was observed. In contrast, an extinction of the fear response was seen in saline and procaine animals repeatedly exposed to the nonreinforced CS. The results from control subjects injected with cocaine either in the shock chambers (contextual cues) or in their home cage environment, suggest that the systemic effects of this stimulant served to intensify the fear-eliciting properties acquired by the CS during fear conditioning. These findings demonstrate a cocaine sensitization of conditioned fear, and were related to the emotional and psychological disturbances associated with long-term cocaine use.

Sensitization to cocaine's motor activating properties produced by electrical kindling of the medial prefrontal cortex but not of the hippocampus

A substantial body of evidence has accumulated that implicates NMDA systems in the neural changes that are associated with the development of both electrical kindling of limbic sites and sensitization to the behavioral effects of repeated stimulant exposure. This study sought to establish whether electrical kindling of the brain was a sufficient condition for inducing sensitization to cocaine's motor activating effects and, if so, whether the cross sensitization was a result of kindling of a specific locus. Rats received daily electrical stimulation of either the medial prefrontal cortex or the hippocampus. Other rats received the electrode implants and were handled daily but received no electrical stimulation. Stage 5 seizures developed in response to the stimulation in 32-35 days. Once this criterion of kindling was established and following a 14 day waiting period the effectiveness of cocaine (0.0, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg) in elevating horizontal motor activity was determined. For all 3 groups (sham controls, prefrontal cortical and hippocampal stimulated rats) cocaine produced a dose-dependent increase in horizontal activity. The sham controls and hippocampal rats did not differ in the magnitude of the cocaine-produced effect. However, rats that had received stimulation of the prefrontal cortex showed heightened levels of cocaine-induced activity that were particularly apparent in response to 10.0 mg/kg cocaine. These data suggest that kindling of the prefrontal cortex had sensitized rats to the behavioral effects of cocaine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)