The effects of (+/-)-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and (+/-)-methylenedioxyamphetamine in monkeys trained to discriminate (+)-amphetamine from saline

Methylenedioxymethamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects of seven cathinones in rats

Synthetic cathinone derivatives are commonly considered quasi-legal alternatives for stimulant drugs, such as cocaine and methamphetamine, but some derivatives are increasingly being detected in club drug formulations of Ecstasy or 'Molly' as substitutes for methylenedioxymethamphetamine (±-MDMA). Although several studies have evaluated the psychostimulant-like effects of synthetic cathinones, few cathinone compounds have been assessed for MDMA-like activity. In order to determine their likelihood of interchangeability with entactogenic club drugs, the discriminative stimulus effects of methcathinone, 4-fluoromethcathinone, 4-methylmethcathinone, 4-methylethcathinone, 3-fluoromethcathinone, pentedrone, and ethylone were assessed in Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 1.5 mg/kg racemic methylenedioxymethamphetamine (±-MDMA) from vehicle. Methamphetamine and the cathinones 4-fluoromethcathinone, 4-methylmethcathinone, 4-methylethcathinone, 3-fluoromethcathinone, pentedrone, and ethylone fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of ±-MDMA. In contrast, methcathinone produced a maximum of only 43% ±-MDMA-appropriate responding and higher doses suppressed responding. Most, but not all of the cathinone compounds tested have discriminative stimulus effects similar to those of MDMA as well as psychostimulant-like effects; however, the potency of MDMA versus psychostimulant substitution varies substantially among the compounds, suggesting that a subset of synthetic cathinones are more MDMA-like than psychostimulant-like. These findings further highlight the highly-variable pharmacology of this class of compounds and suggest that those cathinones with MDMA-like effects may also have increased use as club drugs.

Dark Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine

Better known as "ecstasy", 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a small molecule that has played a prominent role in defining the ethos of today's teenagers and young adults, much like lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) did in the 1960s. Though MDMA possesses structural similarities to compounds like amphetamine and mescaline, it produces subjective effects that are unlike any of the classical psychostimulants or hallucinogens and is one of the few compounds capable of reliably producing prosocial behavioral states. As a result, MDMA has captured the attention of recreational users, the media, artists, psychiatrists, and neuropharmacologists alike. Here, we detail the synthesis of MDMA as well as its pharmacology, metabolism, adverse effects, and potential use in medicine. Finally, we discuss its history and why it is perhaps the most important compound for the future of psychedelic science-having the potential to either facilitate new psychedelic research initiatives, or to usher in a second Dark Age for the field.

Dopamine and serotonin antagonists fail to alter the discriminative stimulus properties of ±methylenedioxymethamphetamine

Most studies on discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) have been conducted using a relatively low dose (1.5 mg/kg), and those studies have invariably implicated serotonergic mechanisms. In contrast, dopaminergic mechanisms mediate the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine (AMPH). Some studies have suggested that the discriminative stimulus effects of a higher (3.0 mg/kg) dose of MDMA might rely on both serotonergic and dopaminergic mechanisms. This study aimed to determine effects of selective dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5HT) antagonists on the discriminative stimulus properties of AMPH (0.5 mg/kg) and MDMA (3.0 mg/kg). Separate groups of rats were trained to discriminate AMPH (0.5 mg/kg) or MDMA (3.0 mg/kg) from saline using a food-reinforced drug-discrimination procedure. Effects of DA (SCH 23390: 0.003-0.03 mg/kg and eticlopride: 0.03-0.3 mg/kg) or 5HT (ritanserin: 1.0-10.0 mg/kg, WAY-100635: 0.3-1.0 mg/kg and GR129375: 1.0-3.0 mg/kg) antagonists on the discriminative stimulus effects of both drugs were determined. Both DA antagonists dose-dependently decreased the AMPH but not the MDMA discrimination. None of the 5HT antagonists altered the discriminative stimulus effects of either drug. The MDMA (3.0 mg/kg) stimulus comprises both a DAergic and 5HTergic response, and the results suggest that either one is sufficient, but not required, to maintain the stimulus effects.

Cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of alpha-pyrrolidinovalerophenone, methcathinone and their 3,4-methylenedioxy or 4-methyl analogs in rhesus monkeys

Synthetic cathinones are beta-ketone amphetamine analogs that have emerged as a heterogeneous class of abused compounds that function as either monoamine transporter substrates or inhibitors. Pre-clinical drug discrimination procedures are useful for interrogating structure-activity relationships of abuse-related drug effects; however, in vivo structure-activity relationship comparisons between synthetic cathinones with different mechanisms of action are lacking. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of the monoamine transporter inhibitor alpha-pyrrolidinovalerophenone (alpha-PVP) and the monoamine transporter substrate methcathinone were differentially sensitive to 3,4-methylenedioxy and 4-methyl substitutions. Male rhesus monkeys (n = 4) were trained to discriminate intramuscular cocaine (0.32 mg/kg) from saline in a two-key food-reinforced discrimination procedure. Potency and timecourse of cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects were determined for (±)-alpha-PVP, (±)-methcathinone and their 3,4-methylenedioxy or 4-methyl analogs. Alpha-PVP and methcathinone produced dose- and time-dependent cocaine-like effects. A 3,4-methylenedioxy addition to either alpha-PVP or methcathinone (methylone) did not alter the potency or efficacy to produce cocaine-like effects, but did prolong the time course. A 4-methyl addition to alpha-PVP (pyrovalerone) did not alter the potency or efficacy to produce cocaine-like effects, but did prolong the time course. In contrast, addition of a 4-methyl moiety to methcathinone (4MMC; mephedrone) significantly attenuated efficacy to produce cocaine-like effects. Overall, these results suggest different structural requirements for cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of monoamine transporter inhibitor and substrate synthetic cathinone analogs. Given that 4MMC is more hydrophobic than MDMC, these results suggest that hydrophobicity may be an important determinant for limiting monoamine transporter substrate abuse-related behavioral effects.

Cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine, cathinone, methamphetamine, and their 3,4-methylenedioxy analogs in male rhesus monkeys

RATIONALE

Synthetic cathinones have emerged as the newest class of abused monoamine transporter substrates. Structurally, these compounds are all beta-ketone amphetamine (cathinone) analogs. Whether synthetic cathinone analogs produce differential behavioral effects from their amphetamine analog counterparts has not been systematically examined. Preclinical drug discrimination procedures have been useful for determining the structure activity relationships (SARs) of abused drugs; however, direct comparisons between amphetamine and cathinone analogs are lacking and, in particular, in non-human primate models.

OBJECTIVES

The study aim was to determine the potency and time course of (±)-amphetamine, (±)-cathinone, and (±)-methamphetamine and their 3,4-methylenedioxy analogs (±)-MDA, (±)-MDC, and (±)-MDMA, respectively, to produce cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects. If cathinone analogs have similar behavioral pharmacological properties to their amphetamine counterparts, then we would predict similar potencies and efficacies to produce cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects.

METHODS

Male rhesus monkeys (n = 4) were trained to discriminate intramuscular cocaine (0.32 mg/kg) from saline in a two-key food-reinforced discrimination procedure.

RESULTS

Racemic amphetamine, cathinone, and methamphetamine produced dose-dependent and full substitution, ≥90 % cocaine-appropriate responding, in all monkeys. Addition of 3,4-methylenedioxy moiety attenuated both the potency and efficacy of amphetamine (MDA), cathinone (MDC), and methamphetamine (MDMA) to produce full cocaine-like effects. Moreover, the cocaine-like effects of amphetamine and cathinone were attenuated to a greater extent than those of methamphetamine or previously published methcathinone (Smith et al. 2016).

CONCLUSION

The presence of an N-methyl group blunted both the potency and the efficacy shift of the 3,4-methylenedioxy addition for both amphetamine and cathinone analogs.

MDMA ("ecstasy") abuse as an example of dopamine neuroplasticity

A number of reviews have focused on the short- and long-term effects of MDMA and, in particular, on the persistent deficits in serotonin neurotransmission that accompany some exposure regimens. The mechanisms underlying the serotonin deficits and their relevance to various behavioral and cognitive consequences of MDMA use are still being debated. It has become clear, however, that some individuals develop compulsive and uncontrolled drug-taking that is consistent with abuse. For other drugs of abuse, this transition has been attributed to neuroadaptations in central dopamine mechanisms that occur as a function of repeated drug exposure. A question remains as to whether similar neuroadaptations occur as a function of exposure to MDMA and the impact of serotonin neurotoxicity in the transition from use to abuse. This review focuses specifically on this issue by first providing an overview of human studies and then reviewing the animal literature with specific emphasis on paradigms that measure subjective effects of drugs and self-administration as indices of abuse liability. It is suggested that serotonin deficits resulting from repeated exposure to MDMA self-administration lead to a sensitized dopaminergic response to the drug and that this sensitized response renders MDMA comparable to other drugs of abuse.

Reinstatement of extinguished amphetamine self-administration by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and its enantiomers in rhesus monkeys

RATIONALE

The effectiveness of MDMA and its enantiomers to reinstate responding previously maintained by drug self-administration has not been thoroughly investigated.

OBJECTIVES

The present study was designed to compare the reinstatement effects of amphetamine, the piperazine-analog BZP, SR(+/-)-MDMA, S(+)-MDMA, R(-)-MDMA, and fenfluramine on behavior maintained under a second-order schedule of intravenous amphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys (n=4).

METHODS

Following saline substitution and extinction, a range of doses of amphetamine, BZP, SR(+/-)-MDMA, S(+)-MDMA, R(-)-MDMA, and fenfluramine were administered i.v. as non-contingent priming injections in order to characterize their effectiveness to reinstate responding previously maintained by amphetamine self-administration.

RESULTS

Priming injections of amphetamine, BZP, SR(+/-)-MDMA, and S(+)-MDMA induced significant reinstatement effects. In contrast, neither R(-)-MDMA nor fenfluramine effectively reinstated behavior. Pretreatment with the selective serotonin transporter inhibitor, fluoxetine, attenuated the reinstatement effects of SR(+/-)-MDMA, S(+)-MDMA, and BZP but had no significant effect on amphetamine-primed reinstatement.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the profile of neurochemical effects published previously, these findings suggest that the reinstatement effects of MDMA are mediated primarily by dopamine release; however, the attenuation of MDMA-induced reinstatement by fluoxetine supports previous research demonstrating the complex behavioral pharmacology of MDMA-like drugs and that the reinstatement effects of MDMA are at least partially mediated by serotonergic mechanisms.

Role of dopamine transporters in the behavioral effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in nonhuman primates

RATIONALE

The interoceptive and reinforcing effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) are similar to those of psychostimulants, but the role of dopamine in the behavioral effects of MDMA is not well documented, especially in primates.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the role of dopamine in the behavioral effects of MDMA in two nonhuman primate species.

METHODS

The behavioral effects of MDMA, with and without serotonergic or dopaminergic pretreatments, were studied in squirrel monkeys trained to respond under a fixed-interval schedule of stimulus termination; effects on caudate dopamine levels were studied in a separate group of squirrel monkeys using in vivo microdialysis. Positron emission tomography neuroimaging with the dopamine transporter (DAT) ligand [18F]FECNT was used to determine DAT occupancy by MDMA in rhesus monkeys.

RESULTS

MDMA (0.5-1.5 mg/kg) did not induce behavioral stimulant effects, but the highest dose of MDMA suppressed responding. Pretreatment with fluoxetine (3.0 mg/kg) or the selective 5HT(2A) antagonist M100907 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) attenuated the rate suppressing effects of MDMA. In contrast, pretreatment with the selective dopamine transporter inhibitor RTI-177 (0.1 mg/kg) did not alter the rate suppressing effects of MDMA. Administration of MDMA at a dose that suppressed operant behavior had negligible effects on extracellular dopamine. The percent DAT occupancy of MDMA at a dose that suppressed operant behavior also was marginal and reflected low in vivo potency for DAT binding.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these results indicate that behaviorally relevant doses of MDMA do not induce behavioral stimulant or dopamine transporter-mediated effects in nonhuman primates.

Discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and its enantiomers in mice: pharmacokinetic considerations

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a drug of abuse with mixed stimulant- and hallucinogen-like effects. The aims of the present studies were to establish discrimination of S(+)-MDMA, R(-)-MDMA, or their combination as racemic MDMA in separate groups of mice to assess cross-substitution tests among all three compounds, to determine the time courses of the training doses, to assess pharmacokinetic variables after single injections and after cumulative dosing, and to define the metabolic dispositions of MDMA enantiomers and their metabolites. All three forms of MDMA served as discriminative stimuli, and with the exception of R(-)-MDMA in mice trained to discriminate the racemate, compounds substituted for one another. The onset of interoceptive effects for S(+)-MDMA and racemic MDMA were faster than for R(-)-MDMA, and the duration of discriminative stimulus effects was shortest for R(-)-MDMA. S(+)-MDMA and its metabolites were found in higher concentrations than R(-)-MDMA and its metabolites after a bolus dose of racemic MDMA. The N-dealkylation pathway is favored in mouse plasma with MDA as the main metabolite formed. Cumulative doses of MDMA lead to higher plasma concentrations compared with an equivalent single dose. 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) concentrations are lower after the cumulative dose compared with the single dose, which, coupled with the nonlinearity observed in MDMA pharmacokinetics after increased doses of racemic MDMA, suggests autoinhibition (or saturation) of MDMA metabolism in mice. In total, these studies suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of racemic MDMA are perhaps driven by accumulation of S(+)-MDMA and S(+)-MDA in the mouse.

N-Methyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (PMMA) and N-Methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDMA) produce non-identical discriminative stimuli in rats

N-Methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (methylenedioxymethamphetamine, MDMA, Ecstasy) and its structurally abbreviated congener N-methyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (para-methoxymethamphetamine, PMMA) are chemically related designer drugs, and PMMA is sometimes sold on the clandestine market as a substitute for MDMA. Prior drug discrimination studies have found that MDMA and PMMA substitute for one another suggesting that they produce similar discriminative stimulus effects in rats. However, there also are some indications that the two agents produce distinct stimulus effects. In this study, further comparisons were made between the stimulus effects of these two agents. Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate either 1.25 mg/kg of PMMA or 1.5 mg/kg of MDMA from saline vehicle in a two-lever operant paradigm. A structure-activity comparison revealed that MDMA and PMMA behave similarly upon homologation of their terminal amine substituents. In contrast, the PMMA stimulus, unlike an MDMA stimulus, failed to generalize completely to the psychostimulant cocaine, 8-hydroxy-2-(N,N-di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH DPAT), and R(-)-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane [R(-)MMA]. In an additional group of animals, a (+)amphetamine stimulus partially generalized to R(-)MMA. Taken together, the results argue and re-emphasize the conclusion that the stimulus effects produced by MDMA and PMMA are similar, but non-identical, and that PMMA is the less "stimulant-like" of the two.

The effects of fluoxetine on the subjective and physiological effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in humans

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of serotonin (5-HT) in the effects of oral 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in humans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The subjective and physiological effects of 1.5 mg/kg MDMA were evaluated after 20 mg fluoxetine in eight recreational MDMA users in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. During phase 1, participants were maintained on placebo for at least 5 days and tested with MDMA and placebo on separate sessions. In phase 2, the procedure was the same except fluoxetine was administered daily for at least 5 days. During sessions, placebo or fluoxetine was given 1 h before the session drug and effects were measured over the next 7 h.

RESULTS

MDMA increased positive-like subjective effects on all the Addiction Research Center Inventory scales; Arousal, Elation, Positive Mood, and Vigor on the Profile of Mood States; Drug Liking, Friendly, Good Drug Effect, High, Stimulated, and Talkative on the Visual Analog Scale; and End-of-Session Liking and Crossover Point on the Multiple Choice Procedure. MDMA also increased measures of anxiety. On the Hallucinogenic Rating Scale, all scales except Volition were increased. MDMA also increased blood pressure and heart rate. Fluoxetine treatment attenuated most of the positive-like subjective effects including the Affect and Soma scales of the Hallucinogen Rating Scale. In addition, heart rate but not blood pressure increases were reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that blockade of 5-HT reuptake by fluoxetine can dampen the effects of MDMA and further supports the role of 5-HT in its behavioral effects in humans.

Pharmacokinetic profile of single and repeated oral doses of MDMA in squirrel monkeys: relationship to lasting effects on brain serotonin neurons

A large body of data indicates that (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'ecstasy') can damage brain serotonin neurons in animals. However, the relevance of these preclinical data to humans is uncertain, because doses and routes of administration used in animals have generally differed from those used by humans. Here, we examined the pharmacokinetic profile of MDMA in squirrel monkeys after different routes of administration, and explored the relationship between acute plasma MDMA concentrations after repeated oral dosing and subsequent brain serotonin deficits. Oral MDMA administration engendered a plasma profile of MDMA in squirrel monkeys resembling that seen in humans, although the half-life of MDMA in monkeys is shorter (3 vs 6-9 h). MDMA was biotransformed into MDA, and the plasma ratio of MDA to MDMA was 3-5 / 100, similar to that in humans. MDMA accumulation in squirrel monkeys was nonlinear, and plasma levels were highly correlated with regional brain serotonin deficits observed 2 weeks later. The present results indicate that plasma concentrations of MDMA shown here to produce lasting serotonergic deficits in squirrel monkeys overlap those reported by other laboratories in some recreational 'ecstasy' consumers, and are two to three times higher than those found in humans administered a single 100-150 mg dose of MDMA in a controlled setting. Additional studies are needed on the relative sensitivity of brain serotonin neurons to MDMA toxicity in humans and non-human primates, the pharmacokinetic parameter(s) of MDMA most closely linked to the neurotoxic process, and metabolites other than MDA that may play a role.

Discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in humans trained to discriminate among d-amphetamine, meta-chlorophenylpiperazine and placebo

In animals, two-choice drug discrimination studies have demonstrated that the behavioral effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) are mediated by dopaminergic and serotonergic systems. In order to delineate the relative role of these systems, three-choice paradigms have been used in animals, with findings indicating a more prominent role for serotonin. Human studies assessing the subjective and physiological effects of MDMA have also indicated a mixed action. To parallel animal studies, the participants in the present study were trained to discriminate among a prototypic dopaminergic agonist, d-amphetamine, a prototypic serotonergic agonist, meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) and placebo and then were tested with two doses of MDMA. In addition, subjective and physiological effects were measured. The results demonstrated that humans could be trained to discriminate among 20 mg d-amphetamine, 0.75 mg/kg mCPP and placebo. When tested with 1.0 and 1.5 mg/kg, half the participants reported MDMA to be like amphetamine and half like mCPP. There were no clear differences between these two groups in other dimensions, although there was an indication that the individuals who discriminated MDMA as d-amphetamine were more sensitive to the effects of all the drugs. The subjective effects of all three drugs overlapped, although the effects of MDMA appeared more amphetamine-like.

S(+)- and R(-)N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDMA) as discriminative stimuli: effect of cocaine

Racemic N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (methylenedioxymethamphetamine, MDMA), a central stimulant and empathogenic agent, and cocaine are drugs of abuse that function as training drugs in drug discrimination studies. In tests of stimulus generalization (substitution), asymmetric generalization occurs between the two agents: a (+/-)MDMA stimulus generalized to cocaine, but a cocaine stimulus did not generalize to (+/-)MDMA. A possible explanation may be found, at least in part, in the stimulus effects of the optical isomers of MDMA. In the present study, groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate either S(+)MDMA (training dose=1.5 mg/kg, i.p.; n=10; ED50=0.6 mg/kg) or R(-)MDMA (training dose=1.75 mg/kg, i.p.; n=7; ED50=0.4 mg/kg) from saline vehicle using a VI-15s schedule of reinforcement. Tests of stimulus generalization with cocaine were conducted in each of the two groups. Cocaine only partially substituted for the S(+)MDMA stimulus (maximum=39% drug-appropriate responding), and various doses of cocaine did not enhance the percent drug-appropriate responding produced by a low dose (0.5 mg/kg) of S(+)MDMA. In contrast, the R(-)MDMA stimulus generalized completely to cocaine (ED50=1.3 mg/kg). Taken together with an earlier report that a (+/-)MDMA stimulus generalizes to cocaine, it would seem that the stimulus actions of cocaine might share greater similarity with R(-)MDMA than with S(+)MDMA.

A comparison of the reinforcing efficacy of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "ecstasy") with cocaine in rhesus monkeys

The purpose of the present study was to compare the reinforcing efficacy of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'ecstasy') to cocaine. Rhesus monkeys (n=4) responded under a within-session, exponentially increasing, progressive-ratio (PR) schedule of cocaine reinforcement. Breaking point (BP) for the PR schedule was defined as the final response requirement completed before 2 h had elapsed without an injection delivered. Saline and doses of cocaine (0.003-0.3 mg/kg/injection) and MDMA (0.01-0.56 mg/kg/injection) were substituted for the training dose of cocaine for at least five consecutive sessions. Both cocaine and MDMA functioned as reinforcers, but self-administration of MDMA occurred at fewer doses and a significantly lower peak BP was obtained for MDMA. These data demonstrate that MDMA functions as a reinforcer, although its reinforcing efficacy appears to be less than that of cocaine.

Comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and cocaine: asymmetric generalization

Evidence suggests that +/- 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and psychostimulants produce similar but non-identical stimulus effects in animals. To examine this hypothesis, groups of rats were trained to discriminate either MDMA (1.5 mg/kg) or cocaine (8 mg/kg) from saline vehicle using a two-lever operant procedure under a variable interval (VI) 15 s schedule of reinforcement. Once the animals were trained, tests of stimulus generalization were conducted with +/- MDMA, cocaine, S+ MDMA, and R- MDMA. As previously demonstrated, both S+ MDMA and R- MDMA (ED50 = 0.8 and 1.2 mg/kg, respectively) substituted for +/- MDMA. Stimulus generalization also occurred upon administration of cocaine (ED50 = 4.6 mg/kg) to the +/- MDMA-trained animals. In the cocaine-trained animals, however, stimulus generalization did not occur to +/- MDMA, S+ MDMA nor R- MDMA. Receptor binding profiles for MDMA and cocaine were compared in an effort to identify any novel and common receptor-based mechanism(s) to explain stimulus generalization of MDMA-trained animals to the effects of cocaine, but only their actions on neurotransmitter transporters seem applicable. Taken together, the results indicate that stimulus substitution between MDMA and cocaine is asymmetric and suggest that although similarities exist between the stimulus actions of MDMA and cocaine, differences might be explained by their differential effects on increasing synaptic concentrations of serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and/or norepinephrine (NE).

The pre-clinical behavioural pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a relatively novel drug of abuse and as such little is currently known of its behavioural pharmacology. This review aims to examine whether MDMA represents a novel class of abused drug. MDMA is known as a selective serotonergic neurotoxin in a variety of animal species but acutely it is a potent releaser and/or reuptake inhibitor of presynaptic serotonin, dopamine, noradrenaline, and acetylcholine. Interaction of these effects contributes to its behavioural pharmacology, in particular its effects on body temperature. Drug discrimination studies indicate that MDMA and related drugs produce unique interoceptive effects which have led to their classification as entactogens. This is supported by results from other behavioural paradigms although there is evidence for dose dependency of MDMA-specific effects. MDMA also produces conditioned place preference but is not a potent reinforcer in self-administration studies. These unique behavioural effects probably underlie its current popularity. MDMA is found in the street drug ecstasy but it may not be appropriate to equate the two as other drugs are routinely found in ecstasy tablets

Designer drugs: how dangerous are they?

Of the designer drugs, the amphetamine analogues are the most popular and extensively studied, ecstasy (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine; MDMA) in particular. They are used recreationally with increasing popularity despite animal studies showing neurotoxic effects to serotonin (5-HT) and/or dopamine (DA) neurones. However, few detailed assessments of risks of these drugs exist in humans. Previously, there were no methods available for directly evaluating the neurotoxic effects of amphetamine analogues in the living human brain. However, development of in vivo neuroimaging tools have begun to provide insights into the effects of MDMA in human brain. In this review, contributions of brain imaging studies on the potential 5-HT and/or DA neurotoxic effects of amphetamine analogues will be highlighted in order to delineate the risks these drugs engender in humans, focusing on MDMA. An overview will be given of PET, SPECT and MR Spectroscopy studies employed in human users of these drugs. Most of these studies provide suggestive evidence that MDMA is neurotoxic to 5-HT neurones, and (meth)amphetamine to DA neurones in humans. These effects seem to be dose-related, leading to functional impairments such as memory loss, and are reversible in several brain regions. However most studies have had a retrospective design, in which evidence is indirect and differs in the degree to which any causative links can be implied between drug use and neurotoxicity. Therefore, at this moment, it cannot be ascertained that humans are susceptible to MDMA-induced 5-HT injury or (meth)amphetamine-induced DA injury. Finally, although little is known about other amphetamine analogues there are important questions as to the safety of these designer drugs as well, in view of the fact that they are chemically closely related to MDMA and some have been shown to be 5-HT neurotoxins in animals.

3,4-Methylenedioxy analogues of amphetamine: defining the risks to humans

The 3,4-methylenedioxy analogues of amphetamine [MDMA ("Ecstasy", "Adam"), MDA ("Love") and MDE ("Eve")] are recreational drugs that produce feelings of euphoria and energy and a desire to socialize, which go far to explain their current popularity as "rave drugs". In addition to these positive effects, the drugs are relatively inexpensive to purchase and have the reputation of being safe compared to other recreational drugs. Yet there is mounting evidence that these drugs do not deserve this reputation of being safe. This review examines the relevant human and animal literature to delineate the possible risks MDMA, MDA and MDE engender with oral consumption in humans. Following a summary of the behavioral and cognitive effects of MDMA, MDA and MDE, risks will be discussed in terms of toxicity, psychopathology, neurotoxicity, abuse potential and the potential for drug-drug interactions associated with acute and chronic use.

Cocaine--stimulus generalization to MDA optical isomers: a reevaluation

It has already been demonstrated that the psychoactive agent 1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDA) produces effects that are both hallucinogen-like and amphetamine or stimulant-like in animals. Hallucinogenic activity is associated primarily with the R(-)-isomer of MDA whereas stimulant activity is primarily associated with the S(+)-isomer. Because a previous report indicates that S(+)MDA fails to substitute for cocaine in rats trained to discriminate cocaine from vehicle, and because these findings are inconsistent with the purported stimulant nature of S(+)MDA, we reinvestigated the effect of both MDA isomers in rats. In this investigation, S(+)MDA doses of 1.25 and 1.5 mg/kg were found to produce > 80% cocaine-appropriate responding in rats trained to discriminate 8 mg/kg of cocaine from saline. However, consistent with a previous report, R(-)MDA resulted only in partial generalization. These new results support the hypothesis that the optical isomers of MDA produce distinguishable stimulus effects in rats and that S(+)MDA is the more stimulant isomer of MDA.

Effects of MDMA on complex brain function in laboratory animals

This review surveys experiments that have examined the effects of acute and chronic MDMA exposure on schedule-controlled operant behaviors thought to engender responses that reflect the expression of complex brain functions. Such functions include time estimation, short-term memory, learning, motivation, and color and position discrimination. Recent experiments conducted in the Behavioral Toxicology Laboratory at the National Center for Toxicological Research concerning MDMA's acute and long-term effects on rhesus monkey performance in an operant test battery are compared to previous studies involving the effects of MDMA on operant behaviors. Results of these experiments suggest that when given acutely, MDMA disrupts complex brain functions associated with learning and time estimation more than those associated with short-term memory and visual discrimination, and that behavioral tasks requiring relatively high rates of responding are particularly sensitive to the disruptive effects of MDMA. Repeated exposure to doses of MDMA sufficient to produce long-lasting changes in brain neurotransmitter systems results in residual effects (e.g. tolerance, sensitivity) on behavioral task performance when subjects are subsequently challenged with acute MDMA, whereas baseline (non-challenged) performance of these tasks after such exposure generally remains unchanged. Although the experiments described herein were conducted on a relatively small number of non-human subjects, they raise the possibility that long-term effects on cognitive processes may also occur in humans exposed to repeated or acute high doses of MDMA.

Effects of (+)-fenfluramine on 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) discrimination in rats

This study examined the effects of a presumed neurotoxic dose regimen of (+)-fenfluramine on the discrimination of MDMA and (+)-amphetamine in male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 1.5 mg/kg MDMA from saline in a two-choice operant task. Substitution tests were conducted with saline, several doses of MDMA (0.19-1.5 mg/kg), and (+)-amphetamine (0.125-1.0 mg/kg) prior to and again following the administration of (+)-fenfluramine (4.0 mg/kg twice a day for 4 days; n = 11) or a similar pattern of saline injections (n = 10). During pretreatment substitution tests, lower doses of MDMA elicited drug-appropriate responding in a dose-dependent manner, although none of these doses substituted for the training dose. Likewise, no dose of (+)-amphetamine substituted for the training drug during pretreatment substitution tests. The discrimination of MDMA was disrupted in some animals following (+)-fenfluramine treatment, but with subsequent training, discrimination criteria were met. In posttreatment substitution tests, the lowest dose of MDMA produced significantly higher drug-appropriate responding in (+)-fenfluramine treated animals but not in saline-treated animals. The amount of drug-appropriate responding during posttreatment substitution tests with (+)-amphetamine varied little from pretreatment substitution tests in saline-treated animals, but was greater at all doses in (+)-fenfluramine-treated animals; the highest dose of (+)-amphetamine substituted for MDMA subsequent to (+)-fenfluramine treatment. These results support previous findings that the long-lasting serotonergic effects of fenfluramine may have functional consequences that can be detected using a drug discrimination procedure. Specifically, serotonin depletion may unmask or strengthen the stimulant-like effects of MDMA.

3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "Ecstasy"): pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans

(+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "Ecstasy"), a ring-substituted amphetamine derivative first synthesized in 1914, has emerged as a popular recreational drug of abuse over the last decade. Pharmacological studies indicate that MDMA produces a mixture of central stimulant and psychedelic effects, many of which appear to be mediated by brain monoamines, particularly serotonin and dopamine. In addition to its pharmacologic actions, MDMA has been found to possess toxic activity toward brain serotonin neurones. Serotonergic neurotoxicity after MDMA has been demonstrated in a variety of experimental animals (including non-human primates). In monkeys, the neurotoxic dose of MDMA closely approaches that used by humans. While the possibility that MDMA is also neurotoxic in humans is under investigation, other adverse effects of MDMA in humans have been documented, including various systemic complications and a number of untoward neuropsychiatric sequelae. Notably, many of the adverse neuropsychiatric consequences noted after MDMA involve behavioral domains putatively influenced by brain serotonin (e.g., mood, cognition and anxiety). Given the restricted status of MDMA use, retrospective clinical observations from suspecting clinicians will probably continue to be a primary source of information regarding MDMA's effects in humans. As such, this article is intended to familiarize the reader with the behavioral pharmacology and toxicology of MDMA, with the hope that improved recognition of MDMA-related syndromes will provide insight into the function of serotonin in the human brain, in health as well as disease.

MDA effects on classical appetitive conditioning of the rabbit jaw movement response

We determined MDA's effects on: (a) conditioning of the rabbit's jaw movement response (JMR) (Experiment 1); and (b) nonassociative JMRs and unconditioned JMRs (Experiment 2). Rabbits were administered 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA; 0, 2, or 4 mg/kg) into the marginal ear vein 20-30 min prior to each of 10 daily sessions. Experiment 1 involved 30 daily training trials of 15 tone- and 15 light-conditioned stimuli (CSs) paired with a 1-ml squirt of water, as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS), injected into the oral cavity. The study revealed that MDA impaired conditioned response (CR) acquisition to tone-CS trials while augmenting CRs to light-CSs. In Experiment 2, the animals received 15 tone- and 15 light CS-alone and 30 UCS-alone presentations daily. The study revealed that MDA produced a modest increase in nonassociative responses over days that interacted with CS modality. Accordingly, these nonassociative effects could not account for MDA's influences on CR acquisition. Moreover, MDA's decrementing and enhancing of CRs to tone- and light-CSs, respectively, appears to be attributable to the drug's enhancing or decrementing tone- and light-CS intensity.

MDMA and memory: the acute and chronic effects of MDMA in pigeons performing under a delayed-matching-to-sample procedure

The purpose of the present study was to examine the acute and chronic effects of (+/-)3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) in pigeons responding under a delayed-matching-to-sample procedure with 0-, 3-, and 6-s delays. In the absence of drug, accuracy (percent correct responses) was inversely related to delay length. When administered pre-chronically, MDMA (0.32-5.6 mg/kg) generally decreased accuracy and response rates at doses of 3.2 mg/kg and above. Although humans report a distinct "hangover" when exposure to MDMA ends, performance of pigeons in the present study did not deteriorate when the chronic regimen ended, indicating an absence of behavioral dependence on the drug. Tolerance developed following chronic exposure to 3.2 mg/kg. In general, greater tolerance occurred at the 0-s delay than at longer delays. Although MDMA is reported to have neurotoxic effects, it does not inevitably produce long-lasting or cumulative behavioral impairment.

Possible serotonergic and dopaminergic mediation of the N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine discriminative stimulus

Eight male rats previously trained to discriminate 2.0 mg/kg N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDE) from its vehicle in a two-lever, food motivated task were utilized to characterize the stimulus properties of MDE. The 5-HT receptor agonists 1-(m-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP), quipazine and 6-methoxy-1,2,3,4 tetrahydro-beta-carboline were able to generalize to the stimulus produced by MDE. However, the 5-HT receptor agonists m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), buspirone and norfenfluramine, the dopamine receptor agonist amphetamine, as well as the acetylcholine receptor agonist arecoline did not completely generalize. In addition, the simultaneous administration of norfenfluramine and amphetamine generalized to MDE. Pretreatment with the serotonin receptor antagonists cinanserin and metergoline or the dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol failed to completely inhibit the discriminative stimulus produced by MDE. Multiple p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA) pretreatments significantly reduced MDE discrimination, whereas vehicle discrimination was unaffected. Five days following cessation of PCPA pretreatment, MDE discrimination returned to criterion levels and remained at that level. These results suggest that the stimulus produced by MDE involve a complex interaction of various neurotransmitters, with both serotonergic and dopaminergic components.

Three-choice discrimination among (+)-amphetamine, fenfluramine and saline in pigeons

Five pigeons were trained to discriminate among (+)-amphetamine (AMPH; 1.7 or 3.0 mg/kg), fenfluramine (FEN; 5.6 or 10 mg/kg), and saline using a three-choice drug discrimination procedure. The results of the study demonstrated that a reliable discrimination between AMPH and FEN could be obtained and the discriminative stimulus (DS) effects of these two drugs did not overlap, i.e., were mutually exclusive. Phenmetrazine produced a dose-related increase in AMPH-appropriate responding with no responding occurring on the FEN-appropriate key. Two serotonin agonists, quipazine (5-HT2) and MK 212 (5-HT1), produced FEN-appropriate responding in two of three pigeons, while a third pigeon responded predominantly on the AMPH-appropriate key following their administration. In contrast, phencyclidine produced predominantly (greater than 50%) saline-appropriate responding, indicating that the DS effect of phencyclidine was unlike either AMPH or FEN. Finally, compounds known to have multiple DS properties such as MDA and MDMA were tested. The results with these compounds confirmed that these drugs have complex DS effects both within and across individual pigeons.

Tolerance and cross-tolerance to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), methamphetamine and methylenedioxyamphetamine

The effects of (+-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (0.62-20.0 mg/kg), (+)-methamphetamine (MA) (0.62-5.0 mg/kg) and (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) (0.62-5.0 mg/kg) on milk intake in rats were determined before and during a period of repeated daily administration of MDMA. Experimental sessions consisted of 15-min access to a sweetened milk solution each day, 5 days a week. After initial determination of the effects of MDMA, MA and MDA on milk intake, rats were injected daily with either MDMA (2.5-5.0 mg/kg) or saline. Two groups of rats were injected with MDMA, one group 15 min before, and the other group 15 min after the milk-drinking sessions. Two more groups of rats were injected with saline, one group 15 min before, and the other group 15 min after the sessions. During this repeated administration period the effects of MDMA, MA and MDA (injected 15 min prior to the session) were redetermined. In rats that had been injected with MDMA on a daily basis either before or after the milk-drinking sessions, the dose-response function of MDMA was shifted to the right, indicating that tolerance had developed. Cross-tolerance to MA appeared to develop only in the group of rats that had been injected with MDMA on a daily basis before the milk-drinking sessions. Cross-tolerance to MDA did not develop in any of the 4 groups of rats.

Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response is disrupted by N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDEA) in the rat

N-Ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDEA) is a derivative of methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), a substituted amphetamine with demonstrated abuse liability. MDA, MDEA and a third substituted amphetamine, methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), all produce a destructive action on central serotonin neurons and appear to induce some similar behavioral effects. The present study investigated the effects of racemic MDEA and its stereoisomers on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response, a behavioral model of sensorimotor gating that is sensitive to psychostimulant drugs. Rats were subjected to 122 dB[A] acoustic noises, some of which were preceded by a weak 80 dB[A] prepulse noise. In vehicle-injected control rats, the prepulse induced a significant decrease in startle amplitude when compared to trials in which startle stimuli were not preceded by prepulses. Administration of racemic MDEA (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) and (+) MDEA (0.1-3.0 mg/kg) induced a significant attenuation in prepulse inhibition, while (-) MDEA (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) did not. Racemic MDMA (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) produced similar though not significant effects. These results confirm a stimulant-like behavioral effect of MDEA despite its relatively modest effects on dopamine markers, and support findings that the (+) stereoisomers of substituted amphetamines are more potent than tha (-) stereoisomers in producing psychostimulant-like biochemical and behavioral effects.

Effects of (+-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) on brain dopaminergic activity in rats

Acute treatment with (+-)3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) at high doses (10 and 30 mg/kg, IP), but not lower doses increased locomotor activity in male rats. MDMA did not consistently produce any other stereotyped behaviors at any dose. Dopamine (DA) turnover rate as estimated by the ratio of brain tissue levels of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) over DA was decreased in the striatum for up to two hours after acute treatment with 10 mg/kg of MDMA. DA turnover rate was inconsistently decreased in the olfactory tubercle and medial basal hypothalamus, and was unchanged in the medial prefrontal cortex and the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area. Two hours after a 30 mg/kg injection of MDMA, DA turnover rate was decreased in all brain areas tested. MDMA and d-amphetamine partially reversed a haloperidol-induced elevation of striatal DOPAC levels. In contrast, the nonamphetamine stimulant, amfonelic acid, enhanced haloperidol's effect. In chloral hydrate-anesthesized rats, MDMA injected IV partially inhibited spontaneous firing rate of DA neurons in the substantia nigra (34% decrease at 4 mg/kg of MDMA). Seventeen days after subchronic MDMA treatment (10 or 20 mg/kg, IP, twice per day for four days), DA and DOPAC levels were unchanged in all brain areas tested as compared to levels in control rats. It is concluded that acute treatment with high but not low doses of MDMA has a weak amphetamine-like effect on nigrostriatal as well as mesolimbic/mesocortical and tuberoinfundibular DA neurons in rats. Repeated treatment with MDMA does not appear to be toxic to mesotelencephalic or tuberoinfundibular DA neurons.

Stimulus effects of N-monoethyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDE) and N-hydroxy-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (N-OH MDA) in rats trained to discriminate MDMA from saline

Tests of stimulus generalization were conducted using rats trained to discriminate 1.5 mg/kg of N-monomethyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane HCl (MDMA) from saline in order to determine if two structurally related analogs (MDE and N-OH MDA) would produce similar stimulus effects. The MDMA-stimulus (MDMA, ED50 value = 0.76 mg/kg) generalized both to MDE (ED50 value = 0.73 mg/kg) and N-OH MDA (ED50 value = 0.47 mg/kg). Administration of (+)amphetamine resulted in partial generalization (maximum of 49% MDMA-appropriate responding) in the MDMA-trained animals. Taken together with our previous studies showing that MDMA substitutes for the phenylisopropylamine stimulant (+)amphetamine, but that neither MDE nor N-OH MDA substitute for (+)amphetamine or for the phenylisopropylamine hallucinogen 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM), the present results [i.e., MDMA-stimulus generalization to MDE, N-OH MDA, but not to (+)amphetamine] suggest that 1) MDMA produces effects other than those that may be considered amphetamine-like, and 2) MDE and N-OH MDA are MDMA-like agents with even less of an amphetamine-like component of action than MDMA itself.

Enhancement of morphine-induced analgesia after repeated injections of methylenedioxymethamphetamine

Repeated administration of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) to rats results in long-term depletion of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) in several brain regions. Because of the apparent role of 5-HT in morphine-induced antinociception, the present experiment was designed to determine the effects of repeated MDMA injections on morphine-induced analgesia. Rats (n = 48) received 8 s.c. injections (one every 12 h for 4 days) of MDMA (20 mg/kg) or saline (1.0 ml/kg). Two weeks after the last injection, the groups were divided into 4 subgroups that received either saline, or morphine 2.5, 3.55 or 5.0 mg/kg (s.c.). Nociception was assayed before and after saline or morphine administration by the method of tail immersion in warm water (55 degrees C). The day after analgesia testing, the animals were sacrificed, brains and spinal cords removed and 5-HT, norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) levels in various brain and spinal cord regions were assayed. The analgesic effect of morphine was enhanced in rats that had received repeated MDMA injections. MDMA selectively depleted 5-HT in the cortex, hippocampus, striatum, brainstem and in the cervical portion of spinal cord. However, 5-HT levels were not changed in the thoracic and lumbar segments of the spinal cord. Thus, a functional consequence of repeated MDMA administration in rats was to enhance morphine-induced antinociception in association with reductions in brain and cervical spinal cord 5-HT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Methysergide potentiates the hyperactivity produced by MDMA in rats

Although some substituted amphetamines, like MDA, produce a combination of sympathomimetic stimulation and perceptual alterations, the psychoactive qualities of MDMA are less distinctive. MDMA binds to serotonergic receptors and has been shown to potently deplete brain serotonin concentrations. Biochemical and behavioral evidence suggests that MDMA may also act on the dopamine system. The present study explored the effects of blocking serotonin receptors on MDMA and amphetamine induced locomotor hyperactivity in rats. Locomotor activity was measured in photocell cages for 120 minutes following injection of methysergide (0, 2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg) or methysergide in combination with amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) or MDMA (10 mg/kg). Methysergide, which had no effect on its own, significantly potentiated the locomotor hyperactivity produced by MDMA but not amphetamine. Thus, the intrinsic serotonergic agonist properties of MDMA may actually counteract the indirect sympathomimetic effects thought to be responsible for the locomotor hyperactivity MDMA produces.

Stimulus properties of 1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDA) analogs

Using a standard two-lever operant procedure, groups of rats were trained to discriminate intraperitoneal doses of the phenylisopropylamines (+)amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) or racemic 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM; 1.0 mg/kg) from saline using a VI 15-sec schedule of reinforcement for food reward. Once trained, the animals were administered doses of several methylenedioxy analogs (MDAs) of phenylisopropylamine including the N-monomethyl [S(+)MDMA and R(-)MDMA], N-monoethyl [(+/-)MDE, S(+)MDE, and R(-)MDE], and the N-hydroxyl [(+/-)N-OH MDA] derivatives. The DOM-stimulus did not generalize to any of these agents. The amphetamine-stimulus generalized to S(+)MDMA, S(+)N-ethylamphetamine and (+/-)N-hydroxyamphetamine, but not to R(-)MDMA, (+/-)MDE, S(+)MDE, R(-)MDE, or N-OH MDA. The present results are consistent with other reports in the literature suggesting that the psychoactive effects of certain MDA derivatives may be other than simply amphetamine- or DOM-like.

Self-administration of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) by rhesus monkeys

Four rhesus monkeys trained to press levers for intravenous cocaine infusions were tested with saline and (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; 3-300 micrograms/kg per infusion) during daily 1-h sessions. From four to over nine times more cocaine infusions were obtained than saline infusions during baseline sessions. When MDMA was substituted for cocaine, at least one dose was self-administered in 3 of the 4 monkeys at rates that exceeded the range of saline infusions. In fact, two of the monkeys self-administered a dose of MDMA at a greater rate than cocaine. These results demonstrate that MDMA can serve as a positive reinforcer for rhesus monkeys and, taken together with other preclinical behavioral studies, suggest a potential for recreational use of MDMA by humans.

Discriminative stimulus properties of (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine in pigeons

Pigeons trained to discriminate (+)-amphetamine (AMPH) from saline in a two-key food-maintained drug discrimination paradigm, were used to investigate the discriminative stimulus (DS) effects of two structural analogues of amphetamine, namely (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA). After discrimination performance was stable (90% injection-appropriate responding), test sessions with various doses of AMPH were conducted and a dose-dependent relationship for AMPH-appropriate responding was obtained. Both MDMA (3.0 mg/kg) and MDA (3.0 or 5.6 mg/kg) substituted for AMPH; however, at these doses MDA produced a greater decrease in response rate compared to AMPH and MDMA. Furthermore, while MDMA and MDA were similar in potency in producing drug-appropriate responding, both were less potent than AMPH. These results indicate that MDMA and MDA have DS effects similar to AMPH in pigeons.

A review of the effects of repeated administration of selected phenylethylamines

Several phenylethylamines are under consideration for international control. The effects of repeated administration of these compounds, including tolerance, physical dependence and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity, are reviewed here. The compounds can be divided into two major chemical groups: those with substituents on the ethylamine portion of the molecule and those with substituents on the phenyl ring. Although the effects of repeated administration have not been directly determined for most of the compounds, certain representative compounds of each chemical group have been examined in some detail. Prominent among the effects of repeated administration are CNS toxicity and tolerance development. Physical dependence has not been reported for any of these compounds. Future research with these compounds should emphasize the investigation of the CNS toxicity and the functional consequences of such effects for the organism.