Prediction of successful suppression of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias by serial drug testing from data derived at the initial electrophysiologic study

Electropharmacologic effect of a standard dose of intravenous procainamide in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) sometimes receive intravenous procainamide during electrophysiologic testing. Unfortunately, the responses to intravenous and subsequent oral drug therapy are variable and may be discordant.

HYPOTHESIS

It was the aim of this study to determine whether this variability might be explained by heterogeneity in the electropharmacologic response, even in a homogeneous population.

METHODS

We studied 42 patients who had spontaneous malignant ventricular arrhythmia and were inducible to sustained monomorphous VT during electrophysiologic testing. Each received 15 mg/kg of intravenous procainamide followed by a 2 mg/min infusion. Serum levels were drawn immediately following programmed stimulation. The mean procainamide level was 6.7 +/- 1.4 mcg/ml with an N-acetyl procainamide level of 1.0 +/- 0.5 mcg/ml. The 14 procainamide responders (5 of whom were noninducible and 9 whose VT cycle length increased > 100 ms) and the 28 nonresponders had similar procainamide and NAPA levels (6.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.7 +/- 1.4 mcg/ml).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in baseline clinical parameters, His to ventricular electrogram (HV) interval, effective refractory period, or VT cycle length. Prolongation of the effective refractory period and infra His conduction time occurred to a similar extent in responders and nonresponders.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that procainamide has a consistent dose-response relationship with respect to refractoriness and conduction in patients with malignant arrhythmias. However, acute antiarrhythmic efficacy of procainamide cannot be predicted by clinical factors, drug levels, or drug-induced changes in common electrophysiologic parameters.

Causes and prognosis of cardiac arrest in a population admitted to a general hospital; a diagnostic and therapeutic problem

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the causes and the prognosis of consecutive patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest occurring in a general hospital. We assessed 28 females and 94 males (aged 13-82 years) who were resuscitated from cardiac arrest not attributable to acute myocardial infarction. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was documented in 97. Non-cardiac causes were excluded. Non-invasive studies (24 h Holter monitoring, 2D echocardiogram, signal-averaged ECG, exercise testing, magnetic resonance imaging) and invasive studies (right and left ventricular angiography, coronary angiography and complete electrophysiologic study (EPS) were performed.

RESULTS

An underlying cardiac disease was found in 107 patients (88%). Patients were followed for a period ranging from 6 months to 10 years (mean 4+/-5 years). Several causes for cardiac arrest were identified and treated specifically. The prognosis was variable. Among surviving patients the following causes of cardiac arrest were found: Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (n=2), rapid supraventricular tachycardia (n=6), acquired or congenital long QT syndrome (n=7), complete atrioventricular block (n=3), proarrhythmic effect of an antiarrhythmic drug (n=5), vasospastic angina (normal coronary arteries) (n=5). Among ten patients with VF related to cardiac ischaemia two died suddenly. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF was the main cause leading to resuscitation after cardiac arrest (n=64). The risk of recurrence of arrest is confirmed in the present study particularly in patients in whom VT/VF could not be suppressed by antiarrhythmic drug therapy (n=45) and in those where an ICD was not implanted (18 cardiac deaths (nine sudden cardiac deaths (SCD's)). The cause of cardiac arrest was not elucidated in 20 patients (16%). The prognosis of these patients differed according to the documentation of VF at the time of cardiac arrest: of those with documented VF (n=12), six patients died suddenly (one with an ICD); of those without documented VF (n=8), all are alive.

CONCLUSION

To determine the precise cause of cardiac arrest was the first problem; the diagnosis of cardiac arrest clearly was erroneous in 8 of 122 patients (6.5%). In other patients, a ventricular tachyarrhythmia was identified as the cause for cardiac arrest in half of the population; the indication for an ICD is evident in this group. In 31% of patients with proven cardiac arrest, another arrhythmia requiring specific treatment was identified and ICD implantation was avoided; these patients had a survival of 92% at 3 years. In patients without an identified cause of cardiac arrest and negative EPS, the prognosis was unfavorable only in those with documented VF.

Infarct related artery patency: relation to serial electropharmacological studies and outcome in patients with previous myocardial infarction and ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Evidence suggests that infarct related artery (IRA) patency may improve survival after acute myocardial infarction, which is thought to be partially due to a lower incidence of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, little is known about the effect of IRA patency on antiarrhythmic drug response and long-term outcome in patients with previous infarction who already experienced sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A total of 152 patients with remote myocardial infarction and documented ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) underwent coronary angiography and programmed ventricular stimulation before and after oral administration of d,l-sotalol (240-640 mg/day). D,l-sotalol suppressed inducibility of VT/VF in 37 (25.2%) patients. The IRA was patent in 38.1% of all patients. There was no significant difference in the frequency of drug response between patients with patent or occluded IRAs (26.8% vs 24.2%, P = 0.87). In patients with a patent IRA, d,l-sotalol tended to be more effective in the absence of a left ventricular aneurysm, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.38). Ejection fraction and collateral blood flow had no effect on drug response in the presence or absence of IRA patency. During follow-up (13.0 +/- 19.9 months) of 29 patients discharged on oral d,l-sotalol, 3 patients experienced symptomatic VT and 4 sudden death. Arrhythmia recurrence and death of all cause (n = 6) and cardiac death (n = 4) were independent of IRA patency status. IRA patency had no effect on short-term drug response to d,l-sotalol in patients with remote myocardial infarction and documented VT/VF. Long-term outcome of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias is independent of IRA patency status. In contrast to a previous report, outcome of electropharmacological testing was not predicted by the patency of the IRA.

The effect of procainamide on T wave alternans

INTRODUCTION

The measurement of microvolt level T wave alternans (TWA) is a technique for detecting arrhythmia vulnerability. Previous studies demonstrated that the magnitude of TWA is dependent on heart rate. However, the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on TWA are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective evaluation of intravenous procainamide on TWA in 24 subjects with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Measurements of TWA were performed at baseline in the drug-free state and after procainamide loading (1,204+/-278 mg). Recordings were made in normal sinus rhythm, and during atrial pacing at 100 beats/min and 120 beats/min. The magnitude of TWA in the vector magnitude lead was decreased by procainamide at all heart rates: 0.6+/-0.8 to 0.3+/-0.4 microV in sinus rhythm, 2.0+/-1.6 to 0.7+/-0.7 microV at 100 beats/min, and 3.0+/-2.0 to 1.7+/-1.8 microV at 120 beats/min (P<0.001 by analysis of variance). The sensitivity of TWA for the induction of VT at baseline was 5% in sinus, 60% at 100 beats/min, and 87% at 120 beats/min, while it decreased with procainamide to 5%, 19%, and 60%, respectively. Decreases in TWA in response to procainamide were independent of the antiarrhythmic effects on VT inducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the magnitude of TWA decreases with acute procainamide loading and this effect decreases the sensitivity of TWA for the induction of sustained VT.

Prospective comparison of intravenous quinidine and intravenous procainamide in patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing

BACKGROUND

Intravenous procainamide hydrochloride is frequently used in the acute care setting and during electrophysiologic testing, but intravenous quinidine gluconate is rarely used because of concerns about its safety. This study prospectively compares the hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of these agents in patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-five consecutive patients with inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias were prospectively treated with either intravenous quinidine gluconate or intravenous procainamide hydrochloride in an alternating unblinded fashion. The hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of these two drugs were compared. Seven (22%) patients assigned to intravenous quinidine gluconate and eight (24%) patients assigned to intravenous procainamide hydrochloride were rendered noninducible for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Four (13%) patients assigned to intravenous quinidine gluconate were unable to complete the infusion compared with none (p = 0.05) assigned to intravenous procainamide hydrochloride. Otherwise, the overall hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of the two drugs were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous quinidine gluconate is a reasonable alternative to intravenous procainamide hydrochloride in patients requiring a parenteral type IA antiarrhythmic agent.

Lack of benefit of very short basic drive train cycle length or repetition of extrastimulus coupling intervals for induction of ventricular tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

There are considerable variations of uncertain importance in basic drive train cycle lengths and degree of repetition of extrastimuli used in programmed ventricular stimulation protocols in different laboratories. We compare prospectively three different stimulation protocols to examine the influence of a short basic drive train cycle length and repetition of extrastimuli on induction of ventricular tachycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty consecutive patients who had documented ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation based on underlying coronary artery disease underwent programmed ventricular stimulation with each of the three study protocols. Protocol A used a basic drive train cycle length of 400 msec with each extrastimulus coupling interval delivered only once. Protocol B used the same basic drive train cycle length, but with each extrastimulus coupling interval repeated three times before decrementing. Protocol C used 300 msec as the cycle length of basic drive trains without repetition of extrastimuli. Sixty-three percent, 67%, and 63% of the study patients had ventricular tachycardia inducible with protocols A, B, and C, respectively (P = NS). Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 23% of the 30 patients in all three protocols. There were no significant differences in the mean cycle lengths of induced ventricular tachycardia, the number of extrastimuli used, and the coupling interval of the last extrastimulus inducing ventricular tachycardia among the three protocols.

CONCLUSION

This study showed no clinical benefit for repetition of extrastimuli that have failed to induce a ventricular tachyarrhythmia during programmed ventricular stimulation. A short basic cycle length of 300 msec was not superior to 400 msec for induction of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. We recommend the use of basic cycle length 400 msec with delivery of each extrastimulus interval only once as the initial protocol for programmed ventricular stimulation.

Procainamide induced change of the width of the zone of entrainment and its relation to the inducibility of reentrant ventricular tachycardia

Procainamide depresses conduction velocity and prolongs refractoriness in myocardium responsible for reentrant VT, but the mechanism by which the induction of VT is suppressed after procainamide administration remains to be determined. In the present study, the relationship between electrophysiological parameters and the noninducibility of VT was assessed during procainamide therapy with a special reference to the change of an excitable gap. Clinically documented monomorphic sustained VT was induced in 30 patients and, utilizing the phenomenon of transient entrainment, the zone of entrainment was measured as the difference between the cycle length of VT and the longest paced cycle length interrupting VT (block cycle length) which was determined as the paced cycle length decreased in steps of 10 ms, and used as an index of the excitable gap. The effective refractory period was measured at the pacing site and the paced QRS duration was used as an index of the global conduction time in the ventricle. The cycle length of VT, the block cycle length, and the width of the zone of entrainment were determined and compared between the responders and nonresponders. In 15 patients, these parameters were determined at the intermediate dose and related to subsequent noninducibility at the final dose. At the final doses of procainamide, VT was suppressed in 8 (26.7%) of 30 patients. However, the cycle length of VT, the block cycle length, and the width of the zone of entrainment were unable to predict the drug efficacy, i.e., noninducibility. The change in the effective refractory period at the pacing site or the width of the paced QRS duration was not different between the responders and nonresponders. Among the variables, only the width of the zone of entrainment showed a significant narrowing in the responders at the intermediate dose of procainamide, and it was smaller than that of the nonresponders. The significant narrowing of the width of the zone of entrainment was associated with the subsequent noninducibility of VT at the final dose. The present study showed that the baseline cycle length of VT, the block cycle length, the drug induced change of the effective refractory period, or the paced QRS duration was not a predictor of the noninducibility after procainamide administration. However, a significant narrowing of the width of the zone of entrainment at the intermediate dose was associated with the noninducibility of VT at the final dose.

Comparison of class Ia/Ib versus class III antiarrhythmic drugs for the suppression of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease

Previous studies suggest that class Ia drugs are ineffective in suppression of sustained ventricular tachycardia by programmed stimulation. More favorable results have been described with combinations of Ia and Ib drugs and also with class III antiarrhythmic drugs, but there have been no direct comparisons between these 2 regimens. The present study was undertaken to compare the electrophysiologic efficacy and predictors of success of these 2 regimens in patients with ischemic heart disease and inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. The population consisted of 136 patients with documented coronary artery disease. All had sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia inducible during baseline electrophysiologic study and following intravenous procainamide. Follow-up studies were performed with a combination of oral class Ia and Ib or class III antiarrhythmic drugs. A positive response was the inability to induce a sustained ventricular arrhythmia with up to 3 extrastimuli at 2 right ventricular pacing sites. Response rates were 13% for Ia/Ib combination and 19% for class III agents (p = 0.40). Congestive heart failure differentially affected response rates. Only 8% of those responding to Ia/Ib therapy had heart failure compared with 59% of responders to class III (p <0.01). Multivariate analysis identified heart failure (RR 12.2, p = 0.03) as the only parameter with independent predictive value of response to Ia/Ib therapy. These results indicate that congestive heart failure is a potent predictor of a negative response to a combination of class Ia and Ib antiarrhythmic drugs. In this population, class III drugs or nonpharmacologic therapy should be considered as initial treatment.

Programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction does not help reduce the risk of ventricular events

Programmed ventricular stimulation could be a useful technique to detect patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death after acute myocardial infarction. However, prevention of arrhythmic events using this technique has never been demonstrated. To determine whether prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy influences prognosis after acute myocardial infarction, 196 patients without spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) but with inducible sustained monomorphic VT were followed for 3 +/- 1 years. Ninety-seven patients were not treated (control group). In 99 patients (study group), the antiarrhythmic therapy was guided by electrophysiologic study: One to four trials using class I, II, and III antiarrhythmic drugs were performed until the VT was not inducible or the induced VT was slower and was associated with hemodynamic stability. An effective antiarrhythmic drug prevented VT induction in 34 patients (34%; group I). Sixty-five patients (group II) still had inducible VT with the antiarrhythmic drug. Group II differed from group I in having a higher incidence of an inferior myocardial infarction location (57% vs. 47%; NS), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (36.5% vs. 41%; NS), a slower rate of induced VT in the control state (227 vs. 255 beats/min; p < 0.05), and a higher number of drug trials (1.9 vs 1.3; p < 0.001). During the follow-up in the control group and in groups I and II, the incidence of total cardiac events was 25%, 15%, and 16% (NS), respectively, and the incidence of total arrhythmic events (VT, sudden death) was 18.5%, 9%, and 12% (NS). Only the risk of VT was reduced (14%, 0%, and 4%; p < 0.05). In conclusion, guided-antiarrhythmic therapy, including class III agents after acute myocardial infarction, was successful in only 34% of patients, and the incidence of arrhythmic events was not significantly decreased. Therefore, programmed ventricular stimulation does not help in managing patients at risk of ventricular arrhythmia after myocardial infarction but could help indicate the need for nonmedical treatment, such as device therapy.

Drug-induced narrowing of the width of the zone of entrainment as a predictor of the subsequent non-inducibility of reentrant ventricular tachycardia after an additional dose of an antiarrhythmic drug

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of drugs used to treat inducible monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been assessed by investigating their ability to suppress inducibility, but the mechanism of the drug action remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To determine electrophysiological variables that predict inducibility, divided doses of class I antiarrhythmic drugs were given and their effects were analysed, particularly the ability of the final dose to suppress inducibility.

METHODS

The excitable gap was estimated by the zone of entrainment, which was defined as the difference between the cycle length of VT and the longest paced cycle length that interrupted VT during entrainment of VT with rapid pacing at paced cycle lengths in decrements of 10 ms. The cycle length of VT, the block cycle length, and the zone of entrainment were measured in the drug free state and after intermediate and final doses of procainamide, disopyramide, cibenzoline, and mexiletine.

RESULTS

Sustained monomorphic VT with a mean (SD) cycle length of 285 (43) ms was induced in 8 patients. It was entrained and interrupted at the block cycle length of 231 (31) ms. The width of the zone of entrainment was 54 (23) ms. In 8 studies VT was not inducible at final doses of procainamide in 4, cibenzoline in 1, and mexiletine in 3. In another 10 studies (procainamide in 4, disopyramide in 1, cibenzoline in 2, and mexiletine in 3), VT remained inducible at the intermediate dose and at the final dose. The cycle length of VT was prolonged to a similar degree in studies of effective and ineffective drugs, but the cycle length that blocked VT was longer at the intermediate dose of the effective drugs. Consequently, the width of the zone of entrainment was significantly narrowed at the intermediate dose of effective drugs and the width of the zone of entrainment was narrower than when ineffective drugs were given (22 (13) ms v 76 (18) or 75 (37) ms at the intermediate and final doses respectively (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Drugs that narrowed the zone of entrainment were associated with non-inducibility of VT after the final dose of the drug was given. The baseline variables did not predict the responses to class I antiarrhythmic drugs.

Electrophysiologic effects of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the prediction of successful suppression of induced ventricular tachycardia

Predictors of a successful outcome of serial electrophysiologic (EP) and drug studies have been identified from among baseline patient characteristics but not from among measures of baseline and drug-related EP effects. Identifying such predictors would be useful in explaining the mechanism of successful drug therapy and in guiding drug development and selection. We prospectively studied EP characteristics in 159 trials in 62 patients with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation during antiarrhythmic therapy and compared EP measures between successful (n = 30) and failed trials (n = 129). The average age of the patients was 64 years (range 27 to 78 years); 82% were men and 18% women; and 87% had coronary artery disease. Measurements included R-R, QRS, and QT intervals during intrinsic rhythm and during pacing at cycle lengths of 600 of 400 msec; ventricular effective refractory periods (ERP) during pacing at cycle lengths of 600 and 400 msec; and changes in these measures, comparing treatment with drug-free baseline. Univariate predictors of success (in order of significance) included ERP600/QRS600, sotalol versus other drugs, ERP400/QRS400, delta ERP600, delta R-R, ERP600, QRS400 (negative association), delta ERP400, QRS600 (negative association), ERP400 (all p < 0.1). In two separate multivariate models, one for each drive cycle length, only the ratio ERP600/QRS600 (p = 0.01) in the first model and ERP400/QRS400 (p = 0.01) in the second model were significantly and independently associated with achieving noninducibility with drug therapy. Therefore measures of greater refractoriness and lesser delays in conduction velocity (ie, greater "wavelength") relate to drug success.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Association between ease of suppression of ventricular arrhythmia and survival

BACKGROUND

We tested the hypothesis that patients whose ventricular arrhythmias are easy to suppress have a lower rate of arrhythmic death, defined as arrhythmic death and nonfatal cardiac arrest, the primary end point in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trials (CAST-I and CAST-II), than patients whose ventricular arrhythmias are hard to suppress. In addition, we evaluated the association between ease of suppression of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality of all causes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CAST-I investigated the effect on arrhythmic death of ventricular premature depolarization (VPD) suppression achieved by three drugs, encainide, flecainide, and moricizine, at two different dose levels; CAST-II investigated the same effect, using moricizine alone at three dose levels. If suppression was achieved, patients were randomized to the effective active drug or corresponding placebo. To examine the independence of easily suppressed ventricular arrhythmias as a predictor of arrhythmic death, we adjusted statistically for other variables that were related both to ease of suppression and arrhythmic death. Patients with ventricular arrhythmias (n = 1778) that were easy to suppress had fewer arrhythmic deaths during follow-up than those with ventricular arrhythmias that were hard to suppress (n = 1173) (relative risk, .59; P = .003). Patients whose VPDs were easily suppressed were older and had a lower frequency of prior history of heart failure and myocardial infarction. They also had a higher incidence of anterior myocardial infarction, VPD frequency, and average ejection fraction. After adjusting for these variables, we found that easily suppressed ventricular arrhythmias were still significant predictors of arrhythmic death (relative risk, .66; P = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the ease of VPD suppression identifies a subgroup of postmyocardial infarction patients who have low risk of arrhythmic death.

Results and efficiency of programmed ventricular stimulation with four extrastimuli compared with one, two, and three extrastimuli

BACKGROUND

Conventional programmed ventricular stimulation protocols are inefficient compared with more recently proposed protocols. The purpose of the present study was to determine if additional efficiency could be derived from a 6-step programmed ventricular stimulation protocol that exclusively uses four extrastimuli.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The subjects were 209 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease and documented sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, aborted sudden death, or syncope. These patients underwent 159 electrophysiological tests in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and 105 electrophysiological tests in the presence of antiarrhythmic therapy. Programmed stimulation was performed with two protocols in random order in each patient. Both protocols used an eight-beat drive train, 4-s intertrain pause, and basic drive cycle lengths of 350, 400, and 600 ms. The 6-step protocol started with coupling intervals of 290, 280, 270, and 260 ms, which were shortened simultaneously in 10-ms steps until S2 was refractory. The 18-step protocol used one, two and three extrastimuli in conventional sequential fashion. The end points were 30 s of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, two episodes of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia requiring cardioversion, or completion of the protocol at two right ventricular sites. There was no significant difference in the yield of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia using the two protocols, regardless of the clinical presentation or treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs. Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia occurred with the 18-step protocol twice as frequently as with the 6-step protocol (6% versus 3%, P < .001). The duration of the 18-step protocol was significantly longer than that of the 6-step protocol in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia (5.5 +/- 7 versus 2.3 +/- 2 minutes, P < .001), as well as in patients without inducible ventricular tachycardia (25.4 +/- 7 versus 6.9 +/- 2 minutes, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

A stimulation protocol that exclusively uses four extrastimuli improves the specificity and efficiency of programmed ventricular stimulation without compromising the yield of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease.

Efficacy of sotalol guided by programmed electrical stimulation for sustained ventricular arrhythmias secondary to coronary artery disease

Sotalol is a class III antiarrhythmic drug with additional beta-blocker activity that has been shown to be effective in supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Its long-term efficacy for ventricular arrhythmias is not as well described. Patients with documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) who had their clinical arrhythmia inducible at baseline electrophysiologic study received sotalol 320 to 640 mg/day. Repeat programmed stimulation was performed after a minimum of 72 hours while receiving the final dose. Of 28 patients (25 men and 3 women) whose arrhythmias were inducible at baseline, 15 had their arrhythmias suppressed with sotalol. Sotalol had greater success in suppressing arrhythmias in those with VF (8 of 9, 89%) than in those with VT (7 of 19, 37%, p < 0.01). In patients with a history of coronary artery disease but no history of myocardial infarction the arrhythmia was suppressed in 7 of 8 (88%) compared with 8 of 20 (40%, p < 0.05) patients with a history of myocardial infarction. All 15 patients in whom ventricular arrhythmias were suppressed continued to take long-term sotalol, and at a follow-up of 10.3 +/- 6.4 months none has had arrhythmia recurrence. Thus, sotalol is an effective drug for the suppression of ventricular arrhythmias as judged by programmed electrical stimulation. It appears to be more effective in patients in whom the clinical arrhythmia is VF rather than VT.

Serial electropharmacologic studies in patients with ischemic heart disease and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: when is drug testing sufficient?

Serial testing of antiarrhythmic drugs by programmed electrical stimulation can be costly in time, expense and risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of serial electropharmacologic tests for similarities that might obviate the need for protracted drug testing. Serial electropharmacologic testing was performed in 283 patients with coronary artery disease and clinical sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). Drug tests were defined as concordant if sustained VT or VF could be consistently induced, or failed to be consistently induced during all such trials in a given patient. The following drugs were included for testing: procainamide, quinidine and disopyramide (class IA); phenytoin, mexiletine and tocainide (class IB); and flecainide and encainide (class IC). All patients were serially tested with > or = 2 (mean and median, 3) antiarrhythmic agents regardless of results from drug-free testing or initial acute drug testing. Overall, the results of serial drug trials directed by programmed stimulation were concordant in more than two thirds of patients. Concordance was comparably high whether patients were serially tested with drugs within the same antiarrhythmic class, or with drugs from differing classes, and was not related to patients' clinical or electrophysiologic characteristics. Protracted serial electropharmacologic testing does not appear necessary for predicting successful or unsuccessful antiarrhythmic drug therapy in survivors of clinical VT or VF. Single drug testing can identify most patients whose arrhythmia will or will not respond to medications.

Usefulness of the response to intravenous procainamide during electrophysiologic study in predicting the response to oral quinidine in patients with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease

The response to intravenous procainamide (15 to 20 mg/kg) and to oral quinidine 324 to 648 mg every 8 hours for 3 to 5 days was prospectively studied in 50 consecutive patients (43 men and 7 women, aged 38 to 83 years old [mean 64 +/- 11]) with coronary artery disease and baseline-inducible sustained monomorphic VT. Mean procainamide and trough quinidine serum levels were 10.5 +/- 2.6 and 2.6 +/- 0.8 micrograms/ml, respectively. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 37 +/- 12%. Sustained monomorphic VT was suppressed by intravenous procainamide in 18 patients (36%); 8 of these patients (44%) also had suppression with oral quinidine, but 10 (56%) did not. Of the 32 patients (64%) who continued to have inducibility with intravenous procainamide, 12 (38%) responded to oral quinidine and 22 (62%) did not. The overall concordant response rate to intravenous procainamide and oral quinidine was 56% (28 of 50 patients). It is concluded that the response (i.e., the presence or absence of inducible sustained monomorphic VT) to intravenous procainamide does not adequately predict the response to oral quinidine in patients with coronary artery disease and sustained monomorphic VT.

Multiple monomorphic ventricular tachycardia configurations predict failure of antiarrhythmic drug therapy guided by electrophysiologic study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the induction at electrophysiologic study of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias with multiple QRS complex configurations predicted failure of subsequent serial electrophysiologic study guided antiarrhythmic drug testing.

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardias with multiple QRS complex configurations are associated with failure of surgical therapy for ventricular tachycardia. As such, the presence of multiple monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardias during electrophysiologic testing may predict failure of subsequent medical therapy.

METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients with coronary artery disease had reproducible induction of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during a baseline electrophysiologic study. Each patient then underwent a mean of 1.5 antiarrhythmic drug trials. An antiarrhythmic drug regimen that suppressed induction of ventricular tachycardia was identified in 13 (26%) of the 51 patients.

RESULTS

Patients with only one inducible monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardia at baseline study were more likely to have an antiarrhythmic drug regimen identified that suppressed inducible ventricular tachycardia than were patients with multiple monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardias (12[36%] of 33 patients vs. 1 [6%] of 18, p = 0.04). In seven patients with only one induced configuration of ventricular tachycardia, a second monomorphic ventricular tachycardia with a different QRS complex configuration occurred during attempts at pacing termination of the induced ventricular tachycardia. None of these seven patients then had successful drug suppression of inducible ventricular tachycardia. Thus, 12 (46%) of 26 patients with a single monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardia observed at baseline study had successful serial drug testing compared with 1 (4%) of 25 patients with multiple QRS complex ventricular tachycardia configurations (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The induction or observation of multiple monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardias at baseline electrophysiologic study predicted failure of subsequent serial electrophysiologic study--guided antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

Influence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the long-term prognosis of survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest not associated with acute myocardial infarction are at high risk for recurrent cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death. The impact of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on long-term prognosis in these patients is uncertain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-one survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (age, 56 +/- 13.7 years) underwent electrophysiologically guided therapy. Implantable defibrillators were placed in 150 patients (45.3%), and 181 patients (54.7%) received pharmacological and/or surgical therapy alone. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 35.2 +/- 16.6% in defibrillator recipients and 45.3 +/- 18.2% in nondefibrillator patients. Median patient follow-up was 24 months in the defibrillator group and 46 months in the nondefibrillator group. In a proportional hazards model, the independent predictors of total cardiac mortality were left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40 (relative risk, 4.55; 95% confidence interval, 2.44 to 8.33; P = .0001), absence of an implantable defibrillator (relative risk, 2.70; confidence interval, 1.41 to 5.00; P = .017), and persistence of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (relative risk, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 3.49; P = .045). The 1- and 5-year probabilities of survival free of cardiac mortality in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40 were 94.3% and 69.6% with a defibrillator and 82.1% and 45.3% without a defibrillator, respectively. For patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.40 or more, the 1- and 5-year probabilities of survival free of cardiac mortality were 97.7% and 94.6% with a defibrillator and 95.4% and 86.9% without a defibrillator, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the implantable defibrillator is associated with a reduction in cardiac mortality, particularly in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Sotalol and type IA drugs in combination prevent recurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the efficacy of the combination of sotalol and either quinidine or procainamide in preventing sustained ventricular tachycardia inducibility and recurrence and prospectively evaluated the ability of the drug combination to prevent ventricular tachycardia recurrence when the arrhythmia remained inducible but was modified.

BACKGROUND

Individual antiarrhythmic drugs are often ineffective in preventing the induction and recurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Beta-adrenergic blockade and prolongation of refractoriness may be important components of successful antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia. We reasoned that the combination of sotalol, which has beta-adrenergic blocking properties and prolonged ventricular refractoriness, and quinidine or procainamide, two agents that slow conduction and prolong refractory periods, would be effective therapy in such patients.

METHODS

We administered low dose sotalol (205 +/- 84 mg/day) plus quinidine sulfate (1,278 +/- 479 mg/day) or procainamide (2,393 +/- 1,423 mg/day) to 50 patients with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation and inducible ventricular tachycardia.

RESULTS

In 21 (46%) of 46 patients, ventricular tachycardia was rendered noninducible at electrophysiologic study (group I), and in 17 patients (37%), inducible tachycardia was modified according to prospectively identified criteria (group II), for a combined 83% response rate. Ventricular refractory periods increased from 252 +/- 24 to 316 +/- 28 ms and from 265 +/- 33 to 316 +/- 24 ms in groups I and II, respectively (p < 0.001), but from 234 +/- 19 to only 286 +/- 13 ms in the group of patients with unmodified ventricular tachycardia inducibility (n = 8, group III, p < 0.001). Cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia slowed from 324 +/- 62 to 432 +/- 70 ms in group II patients (p < 0.001), whereas it slowed less in group III patients (279 +/- 73 to 314 +/- 63 ms, p = NS). Forty-two of the 50 patients (including all patients in groups I and II) were discharged on treatment with the drug combination. After 25 +/- 19 months of follow-up, the actuarial recurrence rate of ventricular tachycardia was 6%, 6% and 11% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Among patients in whom this drug combination was unsuccessful at electrophysiologic study (group III) and in those who received alternative therapy after combination therapy was discontinued because of side effects, actuarial recurrence rates were 9%, 14% and 32% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sotalol plus quinidine or procainamide markedly prolongs ventricular refractoriness and slows induced ventricular tachycardia in a high proportion of patients. Patients with modified or noninducible tachycardia have a low rate of arrhythmia recurrence in follow-up. This drug combination deserves further evaluation.

Infarct artery patency predicts outcome of serial electropharmacological studies in patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Surviving myocardial cells near the infarct border zone form the arrhythmogenic substrate for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in humans. Infarct-related artery (IRA) patency may modulate the electrophysiological function of this arrhythmogenic substrate and its response to antiarrhythmic drug therapy. We postulated that effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy selected during serial electrophysiological studies in patients with VT after a myocardial infarction would be identified more frequently when the IRA is patent than when chronically occluded.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients (n = 64) with documented coronary artery disease and remote myocardial infarction presenting with spontaneous sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) were studied. These patients underwent 4 +/- 2 electropharmacological studies identifying effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy in 16 (25%) patients. Drug responders did not differ significantly from nonresponders in demographic, electrocardiographic, angiographic, or hemodynamic measurements. A patent IRA was associated with antiarrhythmic drug response significantly more frequently than was an occluded IRA (45% versus 9%, p = 0.001). Patency of the IRA was the only independent predictor of response to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in this study population. The sensitivity and specificity of using a patent IRA to predict successful drug testing were 81% and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of electropharmacological studies was predicted by the patency of the IRA. A patent IRA was associated with a greater probability of finding effective drug therapy.

Prognosis after syncope: impact of left ventricular function

A cardiac cause of syncope has been associated with increased sudden death risk, whereas unexplained syncope has a benign prognosis. However, in patients who have depressed left ventricular function, the accuracy of diagnostic tests and the efficacy of therapy, such as antiarrhythmic drugs, are reduced. Previous studies of patients with syncope have not evaluated the contribution of left ventricular performance in risk stratification for sudden death. The purpose of our study of a large population of patients with syncope was to determine the impact of left ventricular dysfunction on sudden death risk if syncope is caused by a cardiac cause or remains unexplained after electrophysiologic testing. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship of left ventricular ejection fraction to sudden death prognosis in 88 consecutive patients referred for electrophysiologic testing to determine a cause of syncope. The mean age was 57 +/- 18 years, left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.41 +/- 0.20, and 66 patients (75%) had structural heart disease. In 49 patients (56%) a cardiac cause of syncope was diagnosed, and in 39 patients (44%) the cause of syncope remained unexplained after evaluation. Cardiac syncope was attributed to ventricular tachycardia in 27 patients, bradyarrhythmia in 11 patients, and supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in 11 patients. By logistic regression only structural heart disease was independently associated with cardiac cause of syncope (p = 0.003). After a mean follow-up of 790 +/- 688 days, nine patients had died suddenly, eight (89%) of whom had left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Propafenone-mexiletine combination for the treatment of sustained ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy of combined therapy with propafenone and mexiletine for control of sustained ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND

Combination antiarrhythmic drug therapy may enhance efficacy and lead to control of ventricular arrhythmias in some patients. Few reports have studied the combination of class IB and class IC drugs. Thus, this study was designed to investigate a combination of mexiletine and propafenone in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia had their clinical arrhythmia induced by programmed stimulation. Procainamide and propafenone alone failed to prevent reinduction of tachycardia in all. Mexiletine was subsequently added to propafenone and programmed stimulation was repeated.

RESULTS

With combination therapy ventricular tachycardia was noninducible in three patients (19%). A fourth who had presented with polymorphic ventricular tachycardia had slow bundle branch reentry (cycle length 500 ms) induced. In the other 12, tachycardia cycle length increased from 262 +/- 60 ms at baseline to 350 +/- 82 ms with propafenone and to 390 +/- 80 ms with propafenone plus mexiletine (p less than 0.0001 compared with baseline). Hemodynamic deterioration requiring defibrillation occurred in six patients at baseline study, in five taking propafenone and in two taking both drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of propafenone and mexiletine is effective in suppressing the induction of ventricular tachycardia in some patients refractory to procainamide and propafenone alone. In those in whom ventricular tachycardia could still be induced, the rate was slower and hemodynamically tolerated.

Comparison of decremental and burst overdrive pacing as treatment for ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease

Several forms of antitachycardia pacing have been used successfully for terminating cardiac arrhythmias, and implantable devices now incorporate a tier of overdrive pacing for treating of ventricular tachycardia (VT). No consensus exists regarding the optimal mode of pacing therapy. Accordingly, a prospective, randomized, crossover study of antitachycardia pacing was performed to analyze the effects of 2 decremental forms (10 and 5 ms) and a synchronized burst overdrive pacing mode on episodes of VT. Overdrive antitachycardia pacing was an effective therapy (78%) for terminating VT. Burst overdrive pacing and an autodecremental pacing protocol, incorporating a 10 ms decrement, were found to be effective and comparable forms of therapy. Both of these pacing methods were superior in terminating VT when compared with a pacing scheme using a 5 ms coupling decrement (p less than 0.01). Tachycardia acceleration occurred in 6.4% of the episodes of VT. None of the pacing methods displayed a specific propensity for tachycardia acceleration, and no measure of tachycardia segments identified a predilection for pace terminability. Antitachycardia pacing is an effective therapy for VT and different pacing formulas have variable effects. Further, these effects appear to be independent of tachycardia cycle length and variability.

Significance of aborted cardiac arrest and sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients referred for treatment therapy of advanced heart failure

Cardiac arrest in patients with heart failure may be the result of remediable factors such as pulmonary edema, drug toxicity, or electrolyte abnormalities, or it may be due to primary arrhythmias. The relation of prior aborted cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia to subsequent prognosis was assessed in 458 consecutive patients referred for management of advanced heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction 0.2 +/- 0.07). All patients received tailored vasodilator and diuretic therapy and were then followed as outpatients. Patients were divided into four groups: 388 patients (85%) with no prior cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia, 31 patients (7%) with a primary arrhythmia cardiac arrest, 22 patients (5%) with a secondary cardiac arrest, and 17 patients (4%) with sustained ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest. Patients with cardiac arrest resulting from a primary arrhythmia were usually treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (25 patients), and five patients received an implantable defibrillator. After hospital discharge actuarial 1-year sudden death risk (17%) and total mortality (24%) rates for the group with primary arrhythmia were similar to corresponding values in patients with no history of cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia (17% and 30%, respectively). In patients with a secondary cardiac arrest as a result of exacerbation of heart failure (11 patients), torsade de pointes (10 patients), or hypokalemia (one patient), therapy focused on removal of aggravating factors. Actuarial 1-year sudden death (39%) and total mortality (54%) rates for the group with secondary arrest were higher than for patients without a history of cardiac arrest (p = 0.003 and 0.005, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A critical appraisal of indications for the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a remarkably effective therapy for reducing sudden cardiac death in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The indications for implantation of the ICD were approved in 1985 by the United States Food and Drug Administration; it could be implanted in patients who have experienced cardiac arrest or in those with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias which are not suppressed by anti-arrhythmic drugs in the electrophysiology laboratory. These established indications have not changed in the last seven years. In the near future, the release of third-generation ICDs (with antitachycardia pacing) will likely further expand indications for the device. Many patients with stable ventricular tachycardia who have not had syncope or cardiac arrest will receive a third-generation defibrillator. Also, three clinical trials now in progress--CABG-PATCH, Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) and Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT)--are studying "pre-event" patients with low ejection fraction and electrical instability; some of the patients in each trial are being prospectively randomized to the ICD. Within the next five years we will have a better understanding of the role of ICD therapy in such patients. Until these studies are completed, it is important that the indications for the ICD not be expanded.

Evaluation of bepridil efficacy by electrophysiologic testing in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia: comparison of two regimens

The purpose of the study was to evaluate this effect of different doses of intravenous and oral bepridil on the induction of ventricular tachycardia. Thirty-eight patients underwent electrophysiologic evaluation for recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). Sustained monomorphic VT was induced by programmed ventricular stimulation, using up to three extrastimuli in all patients. The effects of intravenous bepridil (2 mg/kg) were evaluated during the initial study. Intravenous bepridil prevented the induction of sustained VT in eight patients (21%). Electrophysiologic study was repeated after oral bepridil. In six patients the study was stopped because of adverse effects or VT recurrence. Thirty-two patients underwent repeat study 7 days later, taking oral bepridil, 500 mg/day (n = 16) or 900/day (n = 16). A dose of 500 mg/day of bepridil prevented the induction of sustained VT in only one patient. A dose of 900 mg/day of bepridil prevented the induction of sustained VT in eight patients. There were no significant clinical adverse effects, except in one patient receiving intravenous bepridil. The response to intravenous bepridil did not predict the response to oral bepridil. The response to intravenous or oral bepridil was not related to the plasma level of bepridil but was related to a higher left ventricular ejection fraction. Eight patients (21%) in whom VTs were noninducible on oral bepridil were discharged on 300 mg/day of bepridil if their initial loading dose was 500 mg/day or on 600 mg/day if their initial loading dose was 900 mg/day. They remained free of VT during a follow-up of at least 6 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Drug response at electropharmacologic study in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias: the importance of ventricular refractoriness

The clinical and electrophysiologic predictors of successful antiarrhythmic drug therapy for patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia were evaluated in 59 consecutive patients undergoing serial electropharmacologic trials. Structural heart disease was less frequently present in patients for whom effective therapy was found (p less than 0.05). The presence of coronary artery disease and a history of prior myocardial infarction were significantly more frequently present in patients for whom antiarrhythmic drug therapy could not be found (p less than 0.05). The corrected QT interval and ventricular effective refractory period measured at a pacing cycle length of 400 ms were significantly shorter in responders compared with nonresponders (QT interval 428 +/- 52 versus 460 +/- 59 ms; ventricular effective refractory period 237 +/- 28 versus 254 +/- 24 ms; (p less than 0.05). In addition, the interelectrogram coupling interval of the ventricular extrastimulus initiating ventricular tachycardia was significantly shorter in responders compared with nonresponders (223 +/- 37 versus 251 +/- 33 ms; p = 0.003). Logistic regression analysis identified a short ventricular interelectrogram coupling interval (p less than 0.01) and absence of prior myocardial infarction (p less than 0.05) as the only independent predictors of antiarrhythmic drug suppression of the induction of ventricular tachycardia. Greater drug-induced increments in the ventricular effective and functional refractory periods were observed in responders than in nonresponders as was the shortest ventricular interelectrogram coupling interval. Thus, baseline electrophysiologic measurements identify patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia who are likely to respond to antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Furthermore, these patients demonstrate greater drug-induced electrophysiologic changes.

The role of combination therapy with mexiletine and procainamide in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia refractory to intravenous procainamide

This study evaluated the role of serial electropharmacological testing on combination therapy with mexiletine and procainamide in 20 patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to intravenous procainamide. The clinical arrhythmias were cardiac arrest in five patients, sustained VT in 11 patients, and recurrent syncope of presumably arrhythmic origin in four patients. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 0.40 +/- 0.12 (mean +/- SD). All patients had inducible sustained VT at baseline and after administration of intravenous procainamide. All 20 patients underwent electropharmacological testing on combination therapy with mexiletine and procainamide. The mean cycle length of inducible sustained VT was 251 +/- 48 ms at baseline, 324 +/- 81 ms on intravenous procainamide (P less than 0.014 vs baseline), and 365 +/- 82 ms on combination therapy (P less than 0.0001 vs baseline, P = NS vs intravenous procainamide). Combination therapy did not suppress VT inducibility, nor did it make VT more difficult to induce in 19 of 20 patients. The remaining one patient had a partial response (runs of nonsustained VT, longest 10 seconds). Furthermore, combination therapy did not significantly prolong the VT cycle length over and above that observed during testing with intravenous procainamide. Therefore, in patients with inducible sustained VT refractory to procainamide during initial electropharmacological testing, mexiletine in combination with procainamide appears to be of little or no value and serial electropharmacological testing on these drugs is of limited usefulness. Early initiation of alternative therapy may be the preferred clinical option.

Prospective comparison of a conventional and an accelerated protocol for programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

This study compared the sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of a "conventional" and "accelerated" programmed stimulation protocol in 293 patients with coronary artery disease who had a history of sustained or nonsustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the conventional protocol, one and two extrastimuli were introduced during sinus rhythm and during basic drive trains at cycle lengths of 600 and 400 msec at the right ventricular apex and then at the outflow tract or septum. In the accelerated protocol, one, two, and then three extrastimuli were introduced at each of three basic drive train cycle lengths (350, 400, and 600 msec) at the right ventricular apex; the procedure was repeated at a second right ventricular site. Six hundred thirty-four electrophysiological tests were performed using one of these two protocols either in the baseline state (293 tests) or during drug testing (341 tests). The yield of sustained, monomorphic VT was 89% with the conventional protocol and 92% with the accelerated protocol during baseline tests in patients who had a history of sustained VT (p = 0.05); 20% and 34%, respectively, during baseline tests in patients with a history of nonsustained VT (p = 0.06); and 70% and 77%, respectively, during drug testing (p = 0.2). To induce sustained, monomorphic VT, 10.1 +/- 5.0 (mean +/- SD) protocol steps and 14.4 +/- 8.7 minutes were required with the conventional protocol, compared with 4.0 +/- 3.7 steps and 5.6 +/- 6.1 minutes with the accelerated protocol (p less than 0.001 for each comparison). Among the tests in which sustained, monomorphic VT was induced, sustained polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation was induced more often with the conventional protocol (3.6%) than with the accelerated protocol (0.9%, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficiency of programmed stimulation can be improved by the early use of a basic drive train cycle length of 350 msec and three extrastimuli. Compared with a conventional stimulation protocol, the accelerated protocol used in this study reduces the number of protocol steps and duration of time required to induce monomorphic VT by an average of more than 50% and improves the specificity of programmed stimulation without impairing the yield of monomorphic VT.

Drug therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias: how many electropharmacologic trials are appropriate?

To determine how many electropharmacologic drug trials should be performed to select therapy for patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the outcome of 150 consecutive patients with inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias undergoing serial electropharmacologic testing was examined. The probability of identifying predicted effective therapy (inductive of fewer than five ventricular responses with three ventricular extrastimuli at three pacing cycle lengths) and the probability of that therapy preventing sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrences were determined as a function of the number of preceding trials. The probability ( +/- SE) of identifying predicted effective therapy by the first trial (0.23 +/- 0.03) was significantly higher than that of the second (0.09 +/- 0.04), third (0.08 +/- 0.04) and fourth (0.05 +/- 0.04) trials (p = 0.001). No patient had predicted effective therapy identified by subsequent trials. The 2 year actuarial probability of freedom from sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias on predicted effective therapy was higher for the first (0.79 +/- 0.08), second (0.73 +/- 0.13) and third (0.86 +/- 0.13) trials than for the fourth (0.33 +/- 0.27) trial (p = 0.02). Thus, the probability of selecting therapy with long-term efficacy was highest for the first trial (0.18), intermediate for the second (0.07) and third (0.07) trials and lowest for the fourth (0.02) and subsequent (0.00) trials. Accordingly, the electropharmacologic approach to therapy selection should be abandoned after three unsuccessful trials.

Immediate reproducibility of electrically induced sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia before and during antiarrhythmic therapy

The immediate reproducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia induction was evaluated prospectively during 106 studies performed in 53 patients with clinical sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Programmed electrical stimulation was performed twice, using the same protocol during 53 drug-free studies and 53 subsequent studies on antiarrhythmic therapy. Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was reproduced in 104 (98%) of the 106 studies. There was no significant difference in the incidence of reproducible tachycardia in the drug-free state compared with that observed during treatment with different classes of antiarrhythmic drugs. An increase in the number of extrastimuli was required to reinitiate the tachycardia in 9 (11%) of 83 studies in which single or double extrastimuli were initially required to induce the tachycardia. In 39 (37%) of 104 studies with reproducible tachycardia induction, the two tachycardias significantly differed in electrocardiographic (ECG) configuration and cycle length. These observations suggest that the overall reproducibility of ventricular tachycardia induction is sufficiently high to provide a reliable marker for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. However, specific tachycardia characteristics such as cycle length and ECG configuration are more variable even within the same study and may be less useful in assessing the effects of subsequent interventions.

Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: is early implantation cost-effective?

The evaluation of survivors of sudden cardiac death with serial electrophysiologic studies involves a lengthy and expensive hospitalization, especially when an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is ultimately necessary. The cost efficacy of this conventional approach was therefore compared with direct implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator after the first electrophysiologic study. Thirty-two survivors of sudden death who had inducible ventricular tachycardia during their initial electrophysiologic study underwent serial drug trials. At discharge 12 (37%) were taking an antiarrhythmic drug found to prevent induction of ventricular tachycardia and 20 underwent cardioverter-defibrillator implantation after serial drug trials proved ineffective. The average length of hospitalization for this group that had undergone serial drug testing was 20.2 +/- 9.3 days at an average cost of $48,900 +/- $31,600. Seven survivors of sudden death had no inducible ventricular tachycardia during their initial electrophysiologic study and underwent direct cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Their average length of hospitalization was 12.6 +/- 6.2 days at an average cost of $40,400 +/- $8,300. It is concluded that automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation as an early intervention is not more costly and indeed may be cost-effective compared with therapy guided by serial electrophysiologic testing. As antitachycardia devices become more versatile, long lived and easier to implant, earlier implantation is likely to compare even more favorably with drug therapy.

Effectiveness of propranolol added to a type I antiarrhythmic agent for sustained ventricular tachycardia secondary to coronary artery disease

The effect of adding propranolol to procainamide, quinidine, propafenone or disopyramide was prospectively evaluated in 37 patients, all with prior infarction and inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT). After showing that VT remained inducible during therapy with a type I drug, 23 patients received intravenous propranolol. The ventricular effective refractory period, prolonged by the type I agent, was further increased by propranolol. The cycle length of the VT also increased after the type I drug and propranolol exaggerated this effect. Seven of the 23 patients were rendered noninducible after propranolol and another 10 manifested a greater than 100 ms increase in induced VT cycle length. In the other 14 patients, propranolol was infused immediately after the basal study. If VT remained inducible, testing was repeated after a type I drug was added. The ventricular effective refractory period, as well as the VT cycle length, increased after propranolol and was further prolonged after the addition of a type I agent. Seven of these 14 patients were rendered noninducible, 3 with propranolol alone and 4 others with the combination, and in 4, the VT cycle length was prolonged by greater than 100 ms. A total of 17 patients were discharged on either propranolol alone (3 patients) or on an effective combination (14 patients). During a mean follow-up of 20 months, 1 patient died suddenly, 2 had recurrence of well-tolerated VT and 9 remain on therapy. Thus, propranolol has a demonstrable antiarrhythmic effect in the invasive laboratory and may supplement the antiarrhythmic efficacy of conventional type I antiarrhythmic drugs.

Usefulness of sotalol in suppressing ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in patients with healed myocardial infarcts

The electrophysiologic effects and antiarrhythmic efficacy of oral sotalol were investigated in 42 patients with coronary artery disease and prior myocardial infarction who presented with ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) or syncope. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 36 +/- 9%. Baseline programmed cardiac stimulation initiated sustained VT (26 patients) or VF (16). The induced arrhythmia was not suppressed by conventional antiarrhythmic drugs in any patient (3 +/- 2 trials/patient). The mean daily dosage of sotalol was 221 +/- 84 mg. The right ventricular effective refractory period increased from 247 +/- 25 to 273 +/- 26 ms with sotalol (p = 0.0001) and the corrected QT interval increased from 431 +/- 35 to 456 +/- 62 ms (p = 0.02). Arrhythmia suppression was defined as no sustained VT or VF in response to programmed cardiac stimulation using up to 3 extrastimuli. Induced VT or VF was suppressed by sotalol therapy in 10 (24%) patients (group 1). Group 1 patients had faster induced arrhythmias at the baseline study than patients whose induced ventricular arrhythmia was not suppressed (group 2). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction tended to be higher in group 1 patients (p = 0.07). Fourteen patients (including 9 group 1 patients) continued receiving sotalol after discharge. In 2 group 2 patients, sotalol was combined with a class IA antiarrhythmic drug. During a mean follow-up period of 7.9 +/- 4.9 months, 2 patients had recurrent VT and in 2 others sotalol was discontinued due to side effects.

Electrophysiologic evaluation of antiarrhythmic therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias

The use of electrophysiologic studies has contributed significantly to our understanding of the mechanisms of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and enhanced our ability to assess objectively the efficacy of various therapeutic interventions in modifying or preventing their recurrence. The basis on which electrophysiologic testing techniques is founded is the ability reproducibility to initiate ventricular arrhythmias by programmed electrical stimulation in patients with a history of recurrent ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Ventricular tachycardia can be initiated by electrophysiologic studies in approximately 90% of patients with clinically documented recurrent, sustained ventricular tachycardia related to coronary artery disease and in 60% of patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Reports indicate that electrophysiologic testing is highly specific as well (99% for sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia). Studies in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia demonstrate that prevention by antiarrhythmic drugs of the ability to initiate tachycardias that were previously inducible by comparable stimulation techniques in the absence of therapy is highly predictive of freedom from recurrent episodes of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. This end point can be achieved in 35 to 75% of patients. This wide range of success rates results from differences in the patient populations studied, as well as major differences in the programmed stimulation and antiarrhythmic drug protocols used among laboratories. The positive predictive value of this technique (defined as the percentage of patients in whom complete suppression of inducible ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation is achieved during electrophysiologic testing with antiarrhythmic drugs and in whom no spontaneous arrhythmia occurs at 1- to 2-year follow-up) ranges between 80 and 95%.