Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses

Preliminary Results in the Investigation of In Vivo Iliac and Coronary Flow Collision, Vortex Formation, and Disorganized Flow Degeneration: Insights from Invasive Cardiology Based on Fluid Mechanics Principles and Practices

Background: In the research of coronary artery disease, the precise initial injury that starts the atherosclerotic cascade remains unidentified. Moreover, the mechanisms governing the progression or regression of coronary plaque are not yet fully understood. Based on the concept that the cardiovascular system is a network of pumps and pipes, could fluid mechanics principles and practices elucidate the question of atherosclerosis using flow dynamics images from a novel angiographic technique, focusing on antegrade and retrograde flows and their collisions in iliac and coronary arteries? Methods: From January 2023 to May 2024, coronary angiograms of all hemodynamically stable patients with stable or unstable angina were screened. The angiograms displaying either no lesions (normal) or mild-to-moderate lesions were selected. Each patient underwent an evaluation of flow dynamics and arterial phenomena in both iliac and right coronary arteries. For each artery, data were categorized based on the following parameters: laminar versus non-laminar flow, presence versus absence of collisions, and presence versus absence of retrograde flow. Additionally, in two sub-studies, we analyzed the relationship between retrograde flow and blood pressure, and artificial intelligence algorithms were used to detect the retrograde flow in the right coronary artery. Results: A total of 95 patients were screened, and 51 were included in this study. The results comprised quantitative data (prevalence of laminar flows, collisions, and retrograde flows) and qualitative data (morphological characteristics of antegrade laminar flow, retrograde contrast flow, and instances of flow collision). The results showed that in the iliac artery, laminar flow was observed in 47.06% (24/51) of cases, with collisions noted in 23.53% (12/51). Retrograde flow was present in 47.06% (24/51) of cases, and notably, 75% (18/24) of these cases were associated with uncontrolled diastolic blood pressure (DBP) above 80 mmHg (p < 0.001). Conversely, in the RCA, laminar flow was observed in 54.9% (28/51) of cases, with collisions noted in only 3.92% (2/51). Retrograde flow was identified in 7.84% (4/51) of cases, and all these cases (100%, 4/4) were associated with uncontrolled systolic blood pressure (SBP) above 120 mmHg, though statistical significance was not reached due to the small sample size (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Based on the concept that the cardiovascular system is a network of pumps and pipes, this research methodology provides intriguing insights into arterial flow behaviors by integrating fluid mechanics practices with novel angiographic observations. The preliminary results of this study identified laminar flow as the predominant pattern, with retrograde flow and collisions occurring infrequently. The implications of vortex, collision, and disorganized flow highlight potential mechanisms for endothelial damage and atherosclerosis initiation. Moreover, the correlation with blood pressure underscores the critical role of hypertension management in preventing adverse hemodynamic events. Future directions include refining imaging techniques and further exploring the mechanistic links between flow dynamics and vascular pathophysiology to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular diseases.

A Practical Approach to Invasive Testing in Ischemia with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries (INOCA)

Up to 65% of women and approximately 30% of men have ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD; commonly known as INOCA) on invasive coronary angiography performed for stable angina. INOCA can be due to coronary microvascular dysfunction or coronary vasospasm. Despite the absence of obstructive CAD, those with INOCA have an increased risk of all-cause mortality and adverse outcomes, including recurrent angina and cardiovascular events. These patients often undergo repeat testing, including cardiac catheterization, resulting in lifetime healthcare costs that rival those for obstructive CAD. Patients with INOCA often remain undiagnosed and untreated. This review discusses the symptoms and prognosis of INOCA, offers a systematic approach to the diagnostic evaluation of these patients, and summarizes therapeutic management, including tailored therapy according to underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Using Dobutamine Test for Noninvasive Functional Assessment of Myocardial Bridging

Background: It has been shown that coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurement by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) during dobutamine (DOB) provocation provides a more accurate functional evaluation of myocardial bridging (MB) compared to adenosine. However; the cut-off value of CFVR during DOB for identification of MB associated with myocardial ischemia has not been fully clarified. Purpose: This prospective study aimed to determine the cut-off value of TTDE-CFVR during DOB in patients with isolated-MB, as compared with stress-induced wall motion abnormalities (VMA) during exercise stress-echocardiography (SE) as reference. Methods: Eighty-one symptomatic patients (55 males [68%], mean age 56 ± 10 years; range: 27–74 years) with the existence of isolated-MB on the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and systolic MB-compression ≥50% diameter stenosis (DS) were eligible to participate in the study. Each patient underwent treadmill exercise-SE, invasive coronary angiography, and TTDE-CFVR measurements in the distal segment of LAD during DOB infusion (DOB: 10–40 μg/kg/min). Using quantitative coronary angiography, both minimal luminal diameter (MLD) and percent DS at MB-site at end-systole and end-diastole were determined. Results: Stress-induced myocardial ischemia with the occurrence of WMA was found in 23 patients (28%). CFVR during peak DOB was significantly lower in the SE-positive group compared with the SE-negative group (1.94 ± 0.16 vs. 2.78 ± 0.53; p < 0.001). ROC analyses identified the optimal CFVR cut-off value ≤ 2.1 obtained during high-dose dobutamine (>20 µg/kg/min) for the identification of MB associated with stress-induced WMA, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 96%, 95%, 88%, and 98%, respectively (AUC 0.986; 95% CI: 0.967–1.000; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that MLD and percent DS, both at end-diastole, were the only independent predictors of ischemic CFVR values ≤2.1 (OR: 0.023; 95% CI: 0.001–0.534; p = 0.019; OR: 1.147; 95% CI: 1.042–1.263; p = 0.005; respectively). Conclusions: Noninvasive CFVR during dobutamine provocation appears to be an additional and important noninvasive tool to determine the functional severity of isolated-MB. A transthoracic CFVR cut-off ≤2.1 measured at a high-dobutamine dose may be adequate for detecting myocardial ischemia in patients with isolated-MB.

Time course of coronary flow capacity impairment in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Microvascular dysfunction in the setting of ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) plays an important role in long-term poor clinical outcome. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is a well-established physiological parameter to interrogate the coronary microcirculation. Together with hyperaemic average peak flow velocity, CFR constitutes the coronary flow capacity (CFC), a validated risk stratification tool in ischaemic heart disease with significant prognostic value. This mechanistic study aims to elucidate the time course of the microcirculation as reflected by alterations in microcirculatory physiological parameters in the acute phase and during follow-up in STEMI patients.

METHODS

We assessed CFR and CFC in the culprit and non-culprit vessel in consecutive STEMI patients at baseline (n = 98) and after one-week (n = 64) and six-month follow-up (n = 65).

RESULTS

A significant trend for culprit CFC in infarct size as determined by peak troponin T (p = 0.004), time to reperfusion (p = 0.038), the incidence of final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow (p = 0.019) and systolic retrograde flow (p = 0.043) was observed. Non-culprit CFC linear contrast analysis revealed a significant trend in C-reactive protein (p = 0.027), peak troponin T (p < 0.001) and heart rate (p = 0.049). CFC improved both in the culprit and the non-culprit vessel at one-week (both p < 0.001) and six-month follow-up (p = 0.0013 and p < 0.001) compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the importance of microcirculatory disturbances in the setting of STEMI, which is relevant for the interpretation of intracoronary diagnostic techniques which are influenced by both culprit and non-culprit vascular territories. Assessment of non-culprit vessel CFC in the setting of STEMI might improve risk stratification of these patients following coronary reperfusion of the culprit vessel.

Myocardial blood flow: Putting it into clinical perspective

In recent years, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-determined myocardial perfusion in conjunction with myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification in mL·g(-1)·min(-1) has emerged from mere research application to initial clinical use in the detection and characterization of the coronary artery disease (CAD) process. The concurrent evaluation of MBF during vasomotor stress and at rest with the resulting myocardial flow reserve (MFR = MBF during stress/MBF at rest) expands the scope of conventional myocardial perfusion imaging not only to the detection of the most advanced and culprit CAD, as evidenced by the stress-related regional myocardial perfusion defect, but also to the less severe or intermediate stenosis in patients with multivessel CAD. Due to the non-specific nature of the hyperemic MBF and MFR, the interpretation of hyperemic flow increases with PET/CT necessitates an appropriate placement in the context with microvascular function, wall motion analysis, and eventually underlying coronary morphology in CAD patients. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of various diagnostic scenarios of PET/CT-determined myocardial perfusion and flow quantification in the detection and characterization of clinically manifest CAD.

Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity for hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenoses

Adequate patient selection for percutaneous coronary intervention is of utmost importance to minimize early and late complications. Consequently, objective evidence for myocardial ischemia is mandatory for the management of patients with coronary artery disease, in particular in multivessel disease and intermediate lesions (40-70% diameter stenosis on angiography). The use of sensor-equipped guide wires for the assessment of functional coronary lesion severity has become widespread in the catheterization laboratory. The indices derived from pressure or flow measurements, fractional flow reserve, coronary flow velocity reserve and relative coronary flow velocity reserve show a high agreement with noninvasive stress testing. However, while these indices are based on either intracoronary pressure or flow, they do not investigate the hemodynamics of the coronary circulation entirely, leading to ambiguous outcomes. Only the use of simultaneously measured pressure and flow will avoid any possible misinterpretation of the data.

Effect of cardiac hybrid ¹⁵O-water PET/CT imaging on downstream referral for invasive coronary angiography and revascularization rate

AIMS

This study evaluates the impact of hybrid imaging on referral for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and revascularization rates.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 375 patients underwent hybrid (15)O-water positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-based coronary angiography (CTCA) imaging for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Downstream treatment strategy within a 60-day period after hybrid PET/CTCA imaging for ICA referral and revascularization was assessed. CTCA examinations were classified as showing no (obstructive) CAD, equivocal (borderline test result), or obstructive CAD, while the PET perfusion images were classified into normal or abnormal. On the basis of CTCA imaging, 182 (49%) patients displayed no (obstructive) CAD. Only 10 (5%) patients who showed no (obstructive) CAD on CTCA were referred for ICA, which were all negative. An equivocal CT study was observed in 80 (21%) patients, among whom 56 (70%) showed normal myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), resulting in referral rates for ICA of 18% for normal MPI and 71% for abnormal MPI, respectively. No revascularizations were performed in the presence of normal MPI, while 59% of those with abnormal MPI were revascularized. CTCA indentified obstructive CAD in 113 (30%) patients accompanied in 59 (52%) patients with abnormal MPI. Referral rate for ICA was 57% for normal MPI and 88% for those with abnormal MPI, resulting in revascularization rates of 26% and 72%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid (15)O-water PET/CTCA imaging impacts clinical decision-making with regard to referral for ICA and revascularization procedures. Particularly, in the presence of an equivocal or abnormal CTCA, MPI could guide in the decision to refer for ICA and revascularization.

Comparison of transesophageal Doppler coronary flow reserve measurements with thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography imaging in assessment of left anterior descending artery stenoses

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Recent studies demonstrate the feasibility of coronary flow reserve measurements by transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) Doppler recordings of coronary sinus or left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery flow velocity for detecting stenoses of the LAD artery. This study compares coronary flow reserve measurements by Doppler TEE with thallium-201 (201Tl) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with proximal single-vessel LAD stenosis.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with various degrees of LAD stenosis (mean area stenosis 71 +/- 24%; range 24-96%) were studied. Area stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography was < 75% in 7 patients and > 75% in 12 patients. Transesophageal LAD and coronary sinus Doppler measurements were performed at baseline and after intravenous dipyridamole. Coronary flow reserve was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline average peak velocities. Predefined coronary flow reserve cut-off values of 1.8 for the coronary sinus method and of 2.0 for the LAD method were used for diagnosis of significant LAD stenosis. Results were compared with qualitative 201Tl dipyridamole SPECT.

RESULTS

Overall predictive accuracy for diagnosis of > 75% LAD stenosis was 79% for 201Tl SPECT, 77% for the transesophageal LAD and 79% for the transesophageal coronary sinus technique. Concordant results between 201Tl SPECT and the LAD and coronary sinus Doppler methods were observed in 79% and 71% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Thallium-201 SPECT and transesophageal Doppler assessment of coronary flow reserve have similar accuracy for diagnosing significant proximal LAD stenosis. Therefore, both transesophageal Doppler techniques might constitute another widely available, noninvasive method for assessment of left coronary artery disease, if disease location is proximal.

Regional myocardial perfusion reserve determined using myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging showed a direct correlation with coronary flow velocity reserve by Doppler flow wire

AIMS

Quantitative analysis of rest-stress myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide assessments of regional myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). The purpose of this study was to compare regional MPR determined by myocardial perfusion MRI with coronary flow reserve (CFR) by intracoronary Doppler flow wire.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were studied. Average peak velocity was measured by Doppler flow wire in the resting state and during adenosine triphosphate (ATP) stress in 36 coronary arteries. CFR measurements for each patient were performed in the culprit and one non-culprit non-stenotic artery. First-pass, contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MR images were obtained in the resting state and during ATP stress within the week before the Doppler wire procedure. Regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) was quantified in 16 myocardial segments by analysing arterial input and myocardial output using a Patlak plot method. MPR was calculated as stress MBF divided by rest MBF. CFR measured by Doppler flow wire was compared with MPR in the myocardial segments corresponding to vessel territories. The average MPR measured by perfusion MRI was 1.77 +/- 0.62 for the culprit arteries and 3.45 +/- 0.78 for the non-culprit arteries, respectively (P < 0.001). The averaged CFR by Doppler flow wire was 1.72 +/- 0.44 in the culprit arteries and 3.14 +/- 0.74 in the non-culprit arteries, respectively (P < 0.001). For both culprit and non-culprit vessel groups, significant direct correlations were observed between MR assessments of MPR and Doppler assessments of CFR (culprit artery: R = 0.87, Non-culprit artery: R = 0.86) On Bland-Altman analysis, the mean differences between MPR determined by myocardial perfusion MRI and CFR measured by Doppler wire were 0.05 in culprit arteries (95% limit of agreement; -0.65 to 0.56) and 0.36 in non-culprit arteries (95% limit of agreement; -1.24 to 0.44). The sensitivity and specificity of MR measurement of MPR for predicting physiologically significant reduction of Doppler CFR (<2) was 88% (95% CI 61.7-98.5) and 90% (95% CI 68.3-98.8), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current results using Doppler flow wire as a reference method demonstrated that quantitative analysis of stress-rest myocardial perfusion MRI can provide a non-invasive assessment of reduced MPR in patients with CAD.

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic coronary flow imaging in identification of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis in patients with left bundle branch block

BACKGROUND

Conventional noninvasive methods have well-known limitations for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, advancements in Doppler echocardiography permit transthoracic imaging of coronary flow velocities (CFV) and measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR). Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of transthoracic CFR measurements for detection of significant left anterior descending (LAD) stenosis in patients with LBBB and compare it to that of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS).

METHODS

Simultaneous transthoracic CFR measurements and MPS were analyzed in 44 consecutive patients with suspected CAD and permanent LBBB. Typical diastolic predominant phasic CFV Doppler spectra of distal LAD were obtained at rest and during a two-step (0.56-0.84 mg/kg) dipyridamole infusion protocol. CFR was defined as the ratio of peak hyperemic velocities to the baseline values. A reversible perfusion defect at LAD territory was accepted as a positive scintigraphy finding for significant LAD stenosis. A coronary angiography was performed within 5 days of the CFR studies.

RESULTS

The hyperemic diastolic peak velocity (44 +/- 9 cm/sec vs 62 +/- 2 cm/sec; P=0.01) and diastolic CFR (1.38 +/- 0.17 vs 1.93 +/- 0.3; P=0.001) were significantly lower in patients with LAD stenosis compared to those without LAD stenosis. The diastolic CFR values of <1.6 yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94% in the identification of significant LAD stenosis. In comparison, MPS detected LAD stenosis with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 29%.

CONCLUSIONS

CFR measurement by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is an accurate method that may improve noninvasive identification of LAD stenosis in patients with LBBB.

Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography and first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of an impaired coronary perfusion in nonsevere coronary stenosis

PURPOSE

To compare quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (FPP-MRI) in symptomatic patients with nonsevere coronary stenosis to detect a reduced coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 35 patients, FPP-MRI and CFVR measurements were performed in 40 coronary arteries with a diameter stenosis (DS) <70% by QCA. From FPP-MRI a myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) was calculated. CFVR was calculated as the ratio of the average peak flow velocity during infusion of adenosine and at rest and was considered reduced if <2. Diagnostic performance of MPRI and DS to detect a reduced CFVR was compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

CFVR was reduced in 16 coronary arteries (40%). Mean DS did not differ in coronary arteries with a reduced CFVR (41.0% +/- 13.3) and a normal CFVR (36.5% +/- 12.3; P = 0.281). Mean MPRI was lower in coronary arteries with a reduced CFVR (1.12 +/- 0.12) compared to a normal CFVR (1.33 +/- 0.2; P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were higher for MPRI (81%, 79%, 0.84) than for DS (56%, 58%, 0.60).

CONCLUSION

FPP-MRI detects impaired CFVR in symptomatic patients with nonsevere coronary stenosis more accurately than QCA and can identify patients with symptomatic ischemia.

Contrast-enhanced Cardiac MR Imaging in the Detection of Reduced Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of contrast material-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for determining impaired coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) by using Doppler flow measurement as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave written informed consent. Eligible patients underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging and invasive measurement of CFR. For contrast-enhanced MR imaging, a three-section single-shot saturation recovery gradient-recalled echo sequence with steady-state free precession was used. Sections were divided into six segments. For each segment, a transmural and subendocardial myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) was calculated by using the upslope of the signal intensity-time curve during the first pass of contrast material at rest and during adenosine infusion (140 microg per kilogram body weight per minute). MPRIs of vascular regions were compared with the corresponding CFR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to find the number of segments needed for best diagnostic accuracy of MPRI and to find a cutoff value for MPRI in the detection of a reduced CFR.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were evaluated (male-to-female ratio, 27:8; mean age +/- standard deviation, 63.5 years +/- 8.2; mean body mass index, 28.8 kg/m(2) +/- 3.8), and 43 vascular regions were analyzed. A linear correlation was found between the MPRI and CFR (r = 0.44, P < .05). The MPRI was significantly lower in vascular regions with a CFR of less than 2.00 than in regions with a CFR of 2.00 or greater (P < .05). Detection of a CFR of less than 2.00 was more accurate with subendocardial MPRI measurements than with transmural measurements. The mean subendocardial MPRI of the segments with the three lowest MPRIs of a vascular region showed the best diagnostic performance in the detection of a CFR of less than 2.00 (area under the ROC curve, 0.85; sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 75%) by using a cutoff value of 1.21.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of subendocardial perfusion analysis in contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging is higher than that of transmural analysis.

Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology

With advances in technology, the physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in patients in the catheterization laboratory has become increasingly important in both clinical and research applications, but this assessment has evolved without standard nomenclature or techniques of data acquisition and measurement. Some questions regarding the interpretation, application, and outcome related to the results also remain unanswered. Accordingly, this consensus statement was designed to provide the background and evidence about physiological measurements and to describe standard methods for data acquisition and interpretation. The most common uses and support data from numerous clinical studies for the physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory are reviewed. The goal of this statement is to provide a logical approach to the use of coronary physiological measurements in the catheterization lab to assist both clinicians and investigators in improving patient care.

Cut-off value of coronary flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the assessment of significant donor left anterior descending artery stenosis in patients with spontaneously visible collaterals

We evaluated the influence of collateral circulation on a donor left anterior descending artery and an appropriate cut-off value of coronary flow velocity reserve for the diagnosis of significant donor left anterior descending artery stenosis. Measurement of coronary flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography provides noninvasive assessment of significant left anterior descending artery stenosis. The cut-off value of coronary flow velocity reserve for the diagnosis of significant donor left anterior descending artery stenosis has not been well studied. We retrospectively examined 64 patients who had no significant left anterior descending artery stenosis and who had other coronary artery stenosis. Seventeen patients had collaterals from the left anterior descending artery (group A) and 47 patients did not have collaterals (group B). We prospectively examined 23 consecutive patients who had collaterals from the left anterior descending artery to other coronary arteries. Eight patients had a significant donor left anterior descending artery stenosis. Coronary flow velocity reserve assessment was performed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography in the 2 protocols. Coronary flow velocity at baseline in group A was significantly higher than that in group B. Coronary flow velocity reserve in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (2.6 +/- 0.8 vs 3.2 +/- 0.9, p < 0.05). Coronary flow velocity during hyperemia and coronary flow velocity reserve were significantly lower in patients with significant stenosis. A cut-off value of 2.0 of coronary flow velocity reserve had a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 93% for the diagnosis of significant donor left anterior descending artery stenosis. In conclusion, coronary flow velocity reserve of a donor left anterior descending artery was decreased by the presence of collaterals. However, a cut-off value < 2.0 was appropriate for the diagnosis of significant donor left anterior descending artery stenosis in a population that included patients with collaterals.

Effect of acute hyperhomocysteinemia on coronary flow reserve in healthy adults

BACKGROUND

B-mode ultrasound studies indicate that hyperhomocysteinemia is associated with preclinical structural and functional arterial abnormalities. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of elevated plasma homocysteine levels on coronary flow reserve (CFR).

METHODS

A total of 20 healthy subjects aged 41 +/- 7 years were studied on 2 separate days, a week apart, before and after methionine load (100 mg/kg of body weight) or placebo in a double-blind crossover study. At each visit, homocysteine levels were measured by high performance liquid chromatography and CFR was determined by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.

RESULTS

After methionine load, plasma homocysteine increased from 10.7 +/- 2.8 mumol/L to 30.4 +/- 5.1 mumol/L ( P < .0001) and CFR decreased from 3.0 +/- 0.4 to 2.3 +/- 0.3 ( P < .001). CFR was inversely related to postload homocysteine levels ( r = -0.21, P = .02). After placebo, there was no change in CFR.

CONCLUSION

In asymptomatic adults, acute hyperhomocysteinemia is associated with a significant reduction in CFR.

Microvascular dysfunction in angiographically normal or mildly diseased coronary arteries predicts adverse cardiovascular long-term outcome

OBJECTIVE

To study the role of coronary flow reserve for the prediction of long-term cardiovascular event rate.

DESIGN

Observational, longitudinal.

SETTING

Single-center, coronary vasomotor testing at university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and twenty patients with angiographically normal or minimally diseased coronary vessel.

METHODS

Coronary flow reserve was assessed by intracoronary Doppler and quantitative coronary angiography. Cardiovascular events during follow-up (6.5+/-3 years, range 14-125 months) were defined as sudden death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, ischemic stroke or the need for revascularization by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary as well as peripheral bypass surgery.

RESULTS

Reduced coronary flow reserve was significantly associated with a poor long-term outcome: cardiovascular events occurred in seven (18%) patients in the lowest tertile of coronary flow reserve compared with four patients in the middle tertile (10%) and two patients in the upper tertile (5%) (P=0.019 by Kaplan-Meier analysis). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model revealed coronary flow reserve as an independent predictor of prognosis (P=0.017) in addition to angiographic evidence of atherosclerosis (P=0.047) and arterial hypertension (P=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary flow reserve in normal to mildly diseased arteries is an independent predictor of long-term prognosis of atherosclerosis within the next decade.

Coronary Flow Reserve after Coronary Intervention is Similar in Patients with Preserved Viability in Previous Myocardial Infarction and in Those with Angina Pectoris

The relationship between coronary flow reserve (CFR) and viability in the infarcted myocardium has not been fully clarified. We measured coronary blood flow velocity immediately after coronary intervention (with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA] or stenting) in 38 patients with previous myocardial infarction and preserved viability and 48 with angina pectoris. CFR was calculated and was similar between the two patient groups. No differences in the incidence of post-intervention CFR > 2.0 were detected; there were no differences in postintervention CFR between patients with preserved myocardial viability and those with angina pectoris who underwent PTCA. Coronary stenting reduced the percentage diameter stenosis in both groups compared with PTCA and slightly increased the post-intervention CFR. No differences were, however, detected in postintervention CFR between patients with preserved myocardial viability and those with angina pectoris who underwent additional stenting. These results reveal that in patients with preserved myocardial viability, post-intervention CFR was restored to values similar to those in patients with angina pectoris.

Estimation of myocardial hemodynamics before and after intervention in children with kawasaki disease

OBJECTIVES

We used myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR(myo)) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) to estimate cut-off values for assessment of the functional severity of coronary stenosis and myocardial ischemia, and we tested the usefulness of coronary blood hemodynamic measurements before and after plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve and CFR are useful for assessing the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis, coronary microvascular dysfunction, and myocardial ischemia during cardiac catheterization in adults. However, there have been no reports on the use of these measurements in children with Kawasaki disease (KD).

METHODS

The study group included 128 patients with 314 coronary branches. The subjects were classified into three groups: normal coronary group, with 206 branches; abnormal coronary artery without ischemia group, with 58 branches; and ischemia group, with 50 branches.

RESULTS

In each branch, CFR and FFR(myo) were significantly lower in the ischemia group than in the other groups. Cut-off values for assessing the functional severity of coronary stenosis and CFR were approximately equal to those obtained for adults (CFR: <2.0; FFR(myo): <0.75). We obtained very high sensitivity and specificity for estimating myocardial ischemia using CFR and FFR(myo) (CFR: 94.0% and 98.5%, respectively; FFR(myo): 95.7% and 99.1%, respectively). Both CFR and FFR(myo) were reliable indicators of coronary hemodynamics before and after POBA and CABG.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, CFR and FFR(myo) provide a useful index for assessing the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia and estimating the effectiveness of POBA and CABG in children with KD, the same as they do for adults.

Cut-off value of coronary flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for diagnosis of significant left anterior descending artery stenosis in patients with coronary risk factors

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adequate cut-off value of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for diagnoses of significant left anterior descending (LAD) artery stenosis in a large study population with various coronary risk factors. CFVR, which has been used for evaluation of significant coronary artery stenosis, can be reduced despite angiographically normal coronary arteries in patients with various coronary risk factors. However, the adequate cut-off value of CFVR for diagnosing significant LAD stenosis has not been fully established in patients with coronary risk factors. We examined 138 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography. Clinical histories of coronary risk factors were determined from interviews or medical records. CFVR assessment in the LAD artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was performed in all patients. Of the 138 patients, 30 had significant stenosis, and the remainder had no stenotic lesions in the LAD artery. Receiver-operating characteristic curves for detection of significant LAD stenosis showed that a cut-off value of <2.0 was extremely precise. A cut-off value <2.0 of CFVR had a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 77%, and a negative predictive value of 97% for the presence of significant LAD stenosis. A cut-off value <2.0 of CFVR by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was adequate for the diagnosis of significant LAD stenosis in a population that included patients with coronary risk factors.

Noninvasive assessment of myocardial ischemia in the left ventricular inferior regions by coronary flow reserve measurement using transthoracic doppler echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of noninvasive measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR) by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) for the assessment of myocardial ischemia in the left ventricular (LV) inferior regions.

BACKGROUND

Although coronary flow assessment by TTDE has been determined for the assessment of perfusion abnormality in the LV anterior regions, the usefulness of this method has not been well investigated in the LV inferior regions.

METHODS

We studied 50 patients (43 men; mean age 60 +/- 9 years) with suggested coronary artery disease. CFR in the posterodescending coronary artery (PDA) was calculated as a ratio of hyperemic to basal peak (peak CFR) and mean (mean CFR) flow velocities in the PDA, which were measured by TTDE. CFR values were compared with the results of exercise 201-thallium single photon emission computed tomography.

RESULTS

CFR was successfully measured in 43 of 50 patients (86%). Mean and peak CFR < 2 were shown in 10 of 12 patients with abnormal perfusion in the LV inferior regions, whereas CFR > or = 2 were shown in 30 of 31 patients with normal perfusion. Thus, CFR < 2 in the PDA by TTDE had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 97% for the assessment of perfusion abnormality in the LV inferior regions by 201-thallium single photon emission computed tomography.

CONCLUSIONS

CFR in the PDA measured by TTDE provides data equivalent to those obtained by 201-thallium single photon emission computed tomography for myocardial ischemia in the LV inferior regions.

Relative Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Improves Correlation With Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenoses

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the angiographic and coronary flow velocity parameters that best correlate with the results of stress myocardial perfusion imaging.

DESIGN

Criterion standard.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

Forty-eight patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography for angina or silent ischemia.

INTERVENTIONS

We performed angiographic and coronary flow velocity measurements at rest and during hyperemia at the post-stenotic segment and in the adjacent angiographically normal branch of the left coronary artery. Relative coronary flow velocity reserve (RCFVR) was calculated as the ratio of post-stenotic to reference vessel coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR). The best cutoff points for reversible perfusion defects were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Post-stenotic CFVR showed fairly good correlations with minimal lumen diameter and percentage of diameter stenosis (r = 0.57 and r = 0.55, respectively; p < 0.001). RCFVR showed stronger correlations with these angiographic indexes of stenosis severity (r = 0.66 and r = 0.68, respectively; p < 0.0001). Based on receiver operating characteristic cutoff values (1.67 for post-stenotic CFVR and 0.64 for RCFVR), RCFVR had better agreement with myocardial perfusion imaging results, compared to post-stenotic CFVR (92% vs 75%, respectively). This agreement was more meaningful in patients with moderate coronary artery stenoses (50 to 75%). The area under the curve was 0.65 (not significant) for post-stenotic CFVR and 0.88 (p < 0.01) for RCFVR.

CONCLUSIONS

RCFVR describes better than post-stenotic CFVR the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses.

How to prevent unnecessary coronary interventions: identifying lesions responsible for ischemia in the cath lab

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Coronary angiography is limited by the inability to identify intermediate coronary lesions responsible for ischemia. In the catheterization laboratory three techniques can be used for the evaluation of the physiologic significance of intermediate or borderline significant coronary stenoses: (1) pressure wire-derived coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR), (2) Doppler wire-derived measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR), and (3) intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

RECENT FINDINGS

All of these techniques have been validated for assessing the functional significance of intermediate stenoses, but also have inherent limitations.

SUMMARY

Overall, measurement of FFR appears to be the best method for interrogating intermediate coronary lesions. This review discusses the strengths and limitations of each of these techniques.

Conflicting functional assessment of stenoses in patients with previous myocardial infarction

The utility of fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative flow reserve, and intravascular ultrasound may have an impact on decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with previous myocardial infarction and microvascular dysfunction. The role for fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative flow reserve, and intravascular ultrasound is discussed.

Quantitative assessment of coronary stenosis by harmonic power Doppler with a simple pulsing sequence and vasodilator stress in patients

OBJECTIVES

We examined whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) with harmonic power Doppler (HPD) employing a simple ultrasound pulsing sequence enables estimation of the severity of coronary artery stenosis in patients.

BACKGROUND

Contrast intensity (CI) during MCE with intravenous microbubble infusion is dependent on the myocardial blood flow velocity (MBFV) and pulsing interval (PI).

METHODS

Based on an in vitro experiment, we devised the MBFV index calculated as the reciprocal of the magnitude of CI decay produced by abrupt PI shortening during intermittent imaging. In 68 coronary artery territories from 49 patients, myocardial HPD images were acquired during intravenous infusion of Levovist, while the long PI with 1:10 electrocardiographic gating was shortened to 1:1, both at baseline and during adenosine triphosphate infusion. The MBFV index in each coronary territory and MBFV reserve as the ratio between hyperemia and baseline were compared with the severity of corresponding coronary artery stenosis assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) or by pressure guide wire as the fractional flow reserve (FFR).

RESULTS

Both the MCE-derived MBFV index during hyperemia and MBFV reserve exhibited significant negative correlations with the QCA-derived stenosis severity (r = -0.56 and r = -0.64, respectively). The MBFV reserve positively correlated with FFR (r = 0.89). By combining the cutoff values of the MBFV index during hyperemia and MBFV reserve, > or =75% of stenoses defined by QCA were determined, with a sensitivity of 77.3%, specificity of 93.4%, and accuracy of 88.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Shortening of PI during intravenous MCE with intermittent HPD imaging under vasodilator stress enables assessment of coronary artery stenoses in patients.

Assessment of intermediate stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery with contrast-enhanced transthoracic Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Visual or quantitative assessment of coronary angiography may not exactly predict the physiological significance of intermediate (40-70%) coronary stenosis. Coronary flow reserve is a well-established marker of the functional significance of coronary stenosis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) using contrast-enhanced transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (CE-TTDE) with thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate lesions in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD).

METHODS

A consecutive series of 50 patients with intermediate stenosis in the LAD underwent pharmacological stress thallium-201 imaging and CFVR measured by CE-TTDE.

RESULTS

CFVR could be measured in 49 of 50 patients by the present method. A CFVR <2.0 predicted the presence of a stress thallium defect in 12 of 14 patients (agreement=90%, kappa=0.76, P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of CFVR for stress thallium-201 results were 86 and 91%, respectively. In contrast, significant stenosis (>50% by diameter) showed fair agreement for stress thallium defects (agreement=59%, kappa=0.28, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the evaluation of intermediate lesions in the LAD, CFVR as assessed by CE-TTDE could accurately predict the presence of ischemia on stress thallium imaging, whereas angiographic stenosis did not yield reliable results.

Phasic coronary blood flow velocity pattern and flow reserve in the atrium: regulation of left atrial myocardial perfusion

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess rest and stress atrial coronary blood flow (CBF) velocity and flow reserve.

BACKGROUND

Because of the limitations of the methods used until now for assessing myocardial perfusion (MP) in the small mass of atrial tissue, data are lacking for human atrial MP.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with suitable coronary anatomy underwent CBF velocity measurements with the use of a Doppler guide wire in the proximal left circumflex coronary artery (LCx) and left atrial circumflex branch (LACB), at baseline and after adenosine administration. All measurements were performed at resting heart rate and at 100 and 120 beats/min.

RESULTS

Coronary blood flow velocity in the LACB showed a predominant systolic pattern in contrast to the diastolic pattern of the LCx. There was a disproportionate increase in baseline time-averaged peak coronary flow velocity (cm/s) between the LACB and LCx during the two levels of pacing-induced stress (16.8 +/- 5.5 vs. 16.2 +/- 5.1 at rest; 22.9 +/- 7.9 vs. 18.4 +/- 5.2 at 100 beats/min; and 27.1 +/- 8.0 vs. 20.4 +/- 5.1 at 120 beats/min; significant interaction, p < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in coronary flow reserve (CFR).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary blood flow in the left atrium is out of phase with that in the ventricular myocardium, showing a predominant systolic pattern. Although atrial and ventricular CFR show no significant differences at rest and with two levels of stress, the disproportionate increase in atrial blood flow velocity during stress indicates a peculiarity of atrial perfusion regulation.

Evaluación y guía terapéutica de las lesiones coronarias intermedias en el laboratorio de hemodinámica

Contrast angiography has been used for nearly five decades to evaluate the severity of coronary lesions. However, when attempting to distinguish between intermediate coronary lesions able or unable to produce ischemia, the technique has several limitations. A large number of patients undergo cardiac catheterization without prior evaluation of coronary perfusion by non-invasive tests. This number is likely to increase in the coming years, because current recommendations favor the invasive treatment of acute coronary syndromes. This has triggered marked interest in new diagnostic techniques capable of assessing the physiological significance of intermediate lesions in the catheterization room. This paper reviews the different techniques currently available for scientifically assessing the significance of such lesions. The advantages and limitations of each are discussed.

Magnetic resonance imaging versus Doppler guide wire in the assessment of coronary flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), defined as the ratio of maximal hyperaemic to baseline flow velocity, has been validated as a marker of physiological significance of a coronary lesion. Clinically, this parameter is measured invasively during X-ray angiography using the Doppler guide wire. With magnetic resonance (MR) imaging it is possible to quantify CFVR non-invasively.

DESIGN

The purpose of the study was to compare CFVR, acquired with MR imaging and the Doppler guide wire in patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients suffering from one- or two-vessel coronary artery disease as derived from diagnostic X-ray coronary angiography were included. Coronary flow velocity reserve was measured at baseline and during maximal hyperaemia, obtained by intravenous administration of adenosine using MR phase contrast velocity quantification. Within 2 weeks CFVR was measured invasively with a Doppler guide wire.

RESULTS

In 26 coronary arteries CFVR was acquired with both techniques. Mean CFVR in the stenosed and healthy reference arteries was 1.5 +/- 0.7 and 2.7 +/- 1.0 (P < 0.01) respectively for MR measurements and 1.9 +/- 0.7 and 3.1 +/- 0.6 (P < 0.01) respectively for Doppler measurements. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a non-significant mean difference between the two techniques of 0.4 +/- 1.2.

CONCLUSION

In a selected group of stable patients with coronary artery disease MR flow velocity quantification provides non-invasive data equivalent to the invasive Doppler guide wire data. Variability in both the MR and Doppler ultrasound measurement resulted in a significant scatter of data without systematic difference.

Prognostic value of coronary blood flow velocity and myocardial perfusion in intermediate coronary narrowings and multivessel disease

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the roles of intracoronary derived coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (single photon emission computed tomography, or SPECT) for management of an intermediate lesion in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of the functional significance of intermediate coronary narrowings (40% to 70% diameter stenosis) is important for clinical decision making and risk stratification.

METHODS

In a prospective, multicenter study, SPECT was performed in 191 patients with stable angina and multivessel disease and scheduled for angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, or PTCA) of a severe coronary narrowing. Coronary flow velocity reserve was determined selectively distal to an intermediate lesion in another artery using a Doppler guidewire. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the intermediate lesion was deferred when SPECT was negative or CFVR greater-than-or-equal 2.0. Patients were followed for one year to document major cardiac events (death, infarction, revascularization), related to the intermediate lesion.

RESULTS

Reversible perfusion defects were documented in the area of the intermediate lesion in 30 (16%) patients; CFVR was positive in 46 (24%) patients. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of the intermediate lesion was deferred in 182 patients. During follow-up, 19 events occurred (3 myocardial infarctions, 16 revascularizations). Coronary flow velocity reserve was a more accurate predictor of cardiac events than was SPECT; relative risk: CFVR 3.9 (1.7 to 9.1), p < 0.05; SPECT 0.5 (0.1 to 3.2), p = NS. Multivariate analysis revealed CFVR as the only significant predictor for cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

Deferral of PTCA of intermediate lesions in multivessel disease is safe when CFVR greater-than-or-equal 2.0 (event rate 6%). This selective evaluation of coronary lesion severity during cardiac catheterization allows a more accurate risk stratification than does SPECT, which is important for clinical decision making in this patient cohort.

[Physiologic evaluation of coronary circulation. Role of invasive and non invasive techniques]

For many years, the evaluation of the extent and severity of coronary artery disease has been mainly anatomical, carried out by coronary angiography. However, this technique has methodological limitations and interobserver variability is considerable. Quantification of coronary reserve with pressure guidewires and intracoronary Doppler now provides more precise physiologic evaluation of coronary circulation. Myocardial perfusion single proton emission computed tomography and echocardiography, combined with stress and/or pharmacological challenge testing, though they are only semiquantitative techniques, also offer appropriate complements to coronary angiography in the functional evaluation of coronary patients. The aim of this paper is to discuss the clinical value of these techniques.

Adequate patient selection for coronary revascularization: an overview of current methods used in daily clinical practice

Widely used non-invasive stress modalities, like exercise ECG, MPS and stress-echocardiography, are the tests of first choice for the diagnosis of CAD. It has been shown in numerous studies that non-invasive assessment of perfusion abnormalities is an adequate strategy for risk stratification. Moreover, non-invasive stress testing should be performed before a diagnostic cardiac catheterization to document the presence of myocardial ischemia, as a prerequisite for coronary revascularization. Coronary angiography is the gold standard for identifying CAD; however this technique is limited in assessing functional severity of coronary narrowings ('illusion of luminology'; see also Figure 5). The recently introduced i.c. hemodynamic parameters (CFVR and FFR) can identify functional severity of specific lesions and have shown a good agreement with the results of non-invasive stress test in validation studies. Furthermore, there is accumulating evidence that it is safe to defer a PTCA procedure, based on normal FFR and CFVR values. As these indices are derived during an invasive cardiac catheterization procedure, its use is recommended during a so called 'ad hoc' PTCA setting. Furthermore, they are particularly useful for clinical decision making in patients with documented multivessel CAD, as both indices allow selective evaluation of coronary narrowings in different arteries. Revascularization procedures are costly and always have a potential risk. It is important to be aware that, using above mentioned methods, unnecessary interventions (lacking potential benefit) may be avoided.

Simultaneous intracoronary pressure and Doppler guidewires to assess coronary stenosis: if one is enough, are two too much?

We report a potential source of erroneous estimation of stenosis severity by pressure guidewire assessment. Simultaneous introduction of pressure and Doppler guidewires can lead to an overestimation of stenosis pressure gradient in the evaluation of intermediate stenosis.

Reliability of fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with associated microvascular dysfunction: importance of flow on translesional pressure gradient

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been applied with success as a lesion-specific functional indicator of stenosis severity, at least in patients with normal microcirculation. This study sought to assess the reliability of FFR calculations in patients with associated microvascular dysfunction (e.g., post myocardial infarction, or post-MI). First, the effect of coronary flow changes on translesional pressure gradient was assessed. Therefore, intracoronary pressure and flow was recorded simultaneously across 19 non-infarct-related lesions (both pre- and postinterventional lesions with a mean diameter stenosis of 47% +/- 12%). Measurements were performed by means of a pressure and Doppler wire during maximal hyperemia and also during submaximal hyperemia induced by low-dose adenosine. The drop of coronary flow from 48 +/- 23 ml/min during maximal hyperemia to 36 +/- 18 ml/min during submaximal hyperemia was associated with a small decrease in translesional pressure gradient (from 22 +/- 12 mm Hg to 19 +/- 12 mm Hg; P = 0.02) and a small increase in the mean distal/arterial pressure ratio (Pd/Pa) going from 77% +/- 11% to 81% +/- 11% (P = 0.003). Then, intracoronary pressure and flow measurements were compared across 21 non-infarct-related lesions vs. 22 matched infarct-related lesions. For a similar angiographic stenosis severity (% DS = +/- 44%), maximal flow was 48 +/- 22 ml/min in the non-infarct arteries and 37 +/- 26 ml/min in the infarct arteries (P = 0.03), confirming the presence of severe microvascular dysfunction in infarct regions. Similar to the earlier findings, this hyperemic flow reduction in MI patients was associated with a small increase of FFR (= Pd/Pa): 79% +/- 12% in no MI vs. 83% +/- 12% in MI patients (P = 0.3). A reduction of hyperemic flow by +25%, [correction] such as can be found in patients with severely impaired microvascular function, has a limited effect on FFR calculations (+ 5%). This finding allows the application of standard FFR calculations in a more general population of ischemic heart disease, including patients with recent MI.

Incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine for the assessment of coronary velocity reserve for clinical decision making

Achievement of maximal vasodilatation of the coronary microcirculation is a prerequisite for the measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR). The present study was designed to address the hypothesis that intracoronary adenosine yields more complete vasodilation of the coronary microcirculation when incremental doses are used, resulting in higher and more accurate coronary flow reserve measurements. Four hundred and fifty-seven patients were divided in two groups; group I (319 patients) comprised patients without angiographic evidence of significant coronary artery disease, while group II (138 patients) comprised patients with intermediate coronary stenoses (between 40% and 70% diameter stenosis). Coronary velocity reserve (CVR, a surrogate measurement for CFR) was measured during cardiac catheterization using a Doppler-tipped guidewire. Incremental doses of intracoronary adenosine (12 to 54 microg for the left coronary artery and 6 to 42 microg for the right coronary artery) were administered. There was a significant difference between the initial dose of adenosine and the subsequent incremental doses. Of a total of 479 observations, only 192 (40%) had the maximal CVR value at the first dose. Thirty-nine percent of the patients in group I and 27% in group II with an initial CVR value < 2.5 increased CVR to > or = 2.5 with incremental doses of adenosine. This study suggests that incremental doses of adenosine should be used to achieve maximal CVR for the assessment of the functional significance of coronary lesions. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;54:34-40.

Reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound and intracoronary Doppler measurements

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and intracoronary (IC) Doppler flow velocity measurements. The use of IVUS and IC Doppler has been suggested as a means for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guidance in a series of studies. This would require an acceptable level of accuracy and reproducibility of these two methods for lesion evaluation. In this study, the main focus was on the issue of reproducibility. One hundred and eight patients referred for PCI entered into the study. Inter- and intraobserver variability was measured. Catheter difference was assessed. On-line and off-line measurements were compared. MUSIC criteria were assessed off-line, twice. Calculated and measured diameters were compared. After having obtained initial IC Doppler measurements, the Doppler wire was immediately withdrawn and repositioned for reacquisition of Doppler measurements. IVUS measurements are reproducible and reliable off-line and, to a slightly lesser degree, on-line. Area measurements should be performed more than once and the mean used for vessel description. Lumen diameters should be calculated from the mean of the area measurements. A measuring technique consensus should be reached and adhered to. CFR measurements can be used to determine reduced vs. normal flow reserve. In this study, it was found that proximal to distal velocity ratio and diastolic to systolic velocity ratio variability made these parameters unsuitable for PCI guidance.

Comparison of relative coronary Doppler flow velocity reserve to stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease

To compare relative coronary artery vasodilator reserve (rCVR = CVRtarget/CVRreference) to myocardial perfusion stress imaging, 48 patients with coronary artery stenoses (61% +/- 16%; mean, +/- SD; range, 30%-91%) had measurements of target and reference vessel CVR (Doppler-tipped guidewire). rCVR was computed and compared to stress 201thallium or (99m)technetium-sestamibi myocardial tomography. Compared to 24 patients with negative stress imaging studies, 24 patients with positive stress studies had angiographically more severe stenoses (74% +/- 13% vs. 44% +/- 24%; P = 0.0005) with lower CVR(target) (1.68 +/- 0.55 vs. 2.46 +/- 0.74; P = 0.002) and lower rCVR (0.72 +/- 0.22 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.26; P < 0.003). Based on receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) cut points (CVR > 1.9; rCVR > 0.75), compared to CVR, rCVR had similar agreement (Kappa 0.54 vs. 0.50), sensitivity (63% vs. 71%), specificity (88% vs. 83%), and positive predictive value (83% vs. 81%) with myocardial perfusion tomography. A concordant CVRtarget/rCVR only slightly increased sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (77%, 90%, and 87%, respectively). Although rCVR, like CVR, correlates with stress myocardial perfusion imaging results, rCVR did not have significant incremental prognostic value over CVR alone for myocardial perfusion imaging. However, rCVR does provide additional information regarding the status of the microcirculation in patients with coronary artery disease and complements the CVR for lesion assessment.

Agreement between coronary flow velocity reserve and stress echocardiography in intermediate-severity coronary stenoses

Visual and quantitative assessments of percent diameter stenosis on coronary angiography correlate poorly with functional testing, particularly in intermediate-severity (40%-70%) lesions, yet are frequently relied on to make decisions regarding revascularization. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and relative CFVR (RCFVR) are promising methods for on-line functional assessment of lesion severity in the catheterization laboratory. We sought to determine the agreement between maximal, mean, and relative CFVR and stress echocardiography in intermediate-severity stenoses. The results of exercise or dobutamine stress echocardiography and CFVR measured by intracoronary Doppler were compared in 28 patients referred for assessment of intermediate-severity stenoses, using 15 patients with either angiographically normal coronary arteries or diameter stenoses > 70% as reference groups. CFVR was measured at least three times in response to a bolus of adenosine in the target vessel distal to the stenosis. RCFVR (target/normal vessel CFVR) was also measured in 27 patients. Maximal, mean (of three measures), and relative CFVR were calculated. CFVR > or = 2.0 and RCFVR > or = 0.75 were accepted as normal. A minority (29%) of patients in the intermediate-severity stenosis group had a positive test by either method. There was good to very good agreement between stress echocardiography and maximal CFVR (84%, kappa = 0.62, P < 0.0001) and RCFVR (81%, kappa = 0.59, P < 0.001) across the entire patient cohort, though in the intermediate subgroup concordance was only fair. Using the mean (of three measures of) CFVR for the same comparison improved the agreement in the intermediate subgroup to good (86%, kappa = 0.58, P = 0.002), and in the entire cohort the agreement was very good (88%, kappa = 0.74, P < 0.0001). There was only fair correlation between measures of CFVR and percent coronary stenosis. CFVR improved from 1.8 +/- 0.8 to 2.7 +/- 0.7 after percutaneous intervention (n = 12, P < 0.0001). These results suggest that there is good agreement between CFVR and stress echocardiography across a wide range of coronary lesion severity. The mean of three CFVR measurements distal to the target vessel stenosis increases diagnostic accuracy. Intracoronary Doppler flow velocity measurements at the time of cardiac catheterization may facilitate improved decision-making by providing the ability to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses on-line.