Accuracy of dobutamine echocardiography for detection of myocardial viability in patients with an occluded left anterior descending coronary artery

Left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction: the influence of viability and revascularization - an echocardiographic substudy of the VIAMI-trial

BACKGROUND

Viability seems to be important in preventing ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We investigated the influence of viability, as demonstrated with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography, and the role of early revascularization on the process of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after AMI.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 224 patients who were initially included in the viability-guided angioplasty after acute myocardial infarction-trial (VIAMI-trial). Patients in the VIAMI-trial did not undergo a primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention and were stable in the early in-hospital phase. Patients underwent viability testing within 72 hours after AMI. Patients with viability were randomized to an invasive strategy or an ischemia-guided strategy. Follow-up echocardiography was performed at a mean of 205 days. In this echocardiographic substudy, patients were divided into three new groups: group 1, viable and revascularized before follow-up echocardiogram; group 2, viable, but medically treated; and group 3, non-viable patients.

RESULTS

Group 1 showed preservation of LV volume indices. The ejection fraction (EF) increased significantly from 54.0% to 57.5% (P = 0.047). Group 2 showed a significant increase in LV volume indices with no improvement in EF (53.3% versus 53.0%, P = 0.86). Group 3 showed a significant increase in LV volume indices, with a decrease in EF from 53.5% to 49.1% (P = 0.043). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated the number of viable segments and revascularization during follow-up as independent predictors for EF improvement, especially in patients with lower EF at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Viability early after AMI is associated with improvement in LV function after revascularization. When viable myocardium is not revascularized, the LV tends to remodel with increased LV volumes, without improvement of EF. Absence of viability results in ventricular dilatation and deterioration of EF, irrespective of revascularization status.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00149591 (assigned: 6 September 2005).

Use of pharmaceuticals in noninvasive cardiovascular diagnosis

A number of pharmaceuticals are employed as diagnostic agents for cardiovascular diseases. Four groups of agents are reviewed here: 1) vasoactive substances employed as adjuncts to physical maneuvers in diagnosis of structural heart disease; 2) vasodilators used to produce heterogeneity of coronary flow; 3) sympathomimetic agents simulating the effects of exercise on the heart for the purpose of detection of coronary artery stenosis; and 4) ultrasonic contrast agents used to enhance myocardial imaging for the assessment of segmental wall motion. In the first group are amyl nitrate, a vasodilator, and methoxamine and phenylephrine, both vasopressors. The vasodilators of the second group are dipyridamole and adenosine. When combined with scintigraphic perfusion imaging or with echocardiographic assessment of segmental wall motion, these agents can detect single- or multiple-vessel coronary artery disease with sensitivity and specificity comparable to submaximal exercise. They are especially useful for preoperative risk assessment before noncardiac surgery. The sympathomimetic agents of the third group, dobutamine and arbutamine, increase myocardial contractility and heart rate, and dilate the peripheral vasculature. As with the vasodilators, when combined with nuclear or echocardiographic techniques they are equivalent to exercise in detection of coronary disease. They are especially useful in patients with bronchospastic disease and for assessment of myocardial viability. Agents from groups 2 and 3 have acceptable side-effect and safety profiles. The last group reviewed includes echocardiographic contrast agents that, in this investigative setting, are employed to enhance detection of segmental wall motion when used with agents from groups 2 and 3.

Low dose dobutamine echocardiography for predicting functional recovery after coronary revascularisation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of chronic coronary occlusion on the accuracy of low dose dobutamine echocardiography in predicting recovery of dysfunctional myocardium after revascularisation.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre.

PATIENTS

53 consecutive patients with >/= 70% stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and regional ventricular dysfunction (group 1, non-occluded LAD; group 2, occluded LAD) who underwent dobutamine echocardiography.

INTERVENTIONS

26 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and 27 had percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline studies before revascularisation included cross sectional echocardiography at rest and during dobutamine infusion (5-10 microgram), and coronary angiography. The dobutamine study was performed mean (SD) 35 (28) days before revascularisation. Echocardiography at rest was repeated 90 (48) days after revascularisation.

RESULTS

Of 296 dysfunctional segments, 63 in group 1 (43%; 63/146) and 69 in group 2 (46%; 69/150) (NS) improved at follow up. Mean (SD) regional wall motion score index decreased from 1.97 (0.48) (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 2.93) before revascularisation to 1.74 (0.52) (95% CI 0.70 to 2.78) at follow up in group 1 (p = 0.001), and from 2.12 (0.41) (95% CI 1.30 to 2.98) to 1.88 (0.36) (95% CI 1.16 to 2.60) in group 2 (p = 0.0006). In group 1, sensitivity (87% v 52%; p < 0.0001), negative predictive value (88% v 65%; p = 0.001), and accuracy (77% v 64%; p = 0.01) were all significantly higher than in group 2, despite the angiographic evidence of collaterals in patients with occluded vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

Dobutamine echocardiography shows reduced sensitivity in predicting recovery of dysfunctional myocardium supplied by totally occluded vessels. Thus caution should be used in selecting such patients for revascularisation on the basis of a viability assessment made in this way.

Evaluation of myocardial viability in asymptomatic patients early after infarction with perfusion/metabolism single-photon-emission computed tomographic imaging and dobutamine echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of detection of viability of myocardium in asymptomatic patients early (3-10 days) after Q-wave myocardial infarction on segmental recovery of left ventricular function after elective revascularization.

METHODS

Patients were studied with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography (LDDE) and single photon-emission computed tomography with 99mTc sestamibi and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging. Viability of myocardium was defined as detection of improvement in segmental thickening of left ventricle by LDDE (versus baseline echocardiographic data), uptake of 99mTc sestamibi > 50% of maximum counts, uptake of [18F]-FDG > 50% of maximum normal, combined uptake of 99mTc sestamibi or [18F]-FDG > 50% of normal maximum, uptake of [18F]-FDG > 50% or mismatched pattern (uptake of [18F]-FDG greater than that of 99mTc sestamibi). Functional recovery was defined as improvement of segmental thickening of left ventricle detected at follow-up 8 weeks after infarction (versus baseline resting echocardiographic data). Interpretation of the tests was blinded with respect to the angiographic data and the results of the alternative method.

RESULTS

In total 18 patients with 133 left-ventricle segments with abnormal contractile function at baseline were analysed; 29% were hypocontractile and 71% were noncontractile. Examination with LDDE showed that 18% of the segments had normal contractility and 26% were hypocontractile; the respective percentages were 29 and 28% according to follow-up resting echocardiography. Radionuclide tests for viability of myocardium gave positive results in 57% (uptake of [18F]-FDG > 50%) and 62% (uptake of 99mTc sestamibi > 50%) of cases. With respect to segmental analysis, there was a 25-27% positive concordance, a 24-27% negative concordance, and a 48-50% discordance between the LDDE and the radionuclide definitions of viability of myocardium. Additionally, there was no significant difference among sensitivities and specificities for the definitions of viability. The sensitivity was 69% for the uptake of 99mTc sestamibi > 50% criterion, and the highest specificity was 66% for the LDDE. Incorporation of imaging with [18F]-FDG into the analysis yielded a marginally higher sensitivity of 71% for the criterion of uptake of [18F]-FDG or 99mTc sestamibi > 50%, versus imaging with the 99mTc sestamibi alone.

CONCLUSION

LDDE was more specific and radionuclide imaging more sensitive for detection of viability of myocardium in asymptomatic patients early after infarction. Possibly defective myocardial metabolization of glucose in the period early after infarction and the specific LDDE protocol applied account for the limited benefit of these studies in terms of facilitating prediction of segmental functional recovery after revascularization in this clinical setting.

[Determinants of contractile reserve in the infarction area. A quantitative study using dobutamine in contrast left ventriculography]

AIM

The aim of this study was to relate the contractile reserve in infarction segments to the dysfunction at rest and to the residual coronary stenosis.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 95 patients with a first myocardial infarction. Contrast left ventricular at baseline and after dobutamine infusion at 7.5 microg/kg/min and coronary angiograms were performed. The centerline method was used to quantify the extent of dysfunction (percentage of chords with dysfunction in the territory of the infarction artery) and its maximum severity (maximum units of standard deviation [SD] below the normal wall motion reference). Reduction of dysfunction extent with dobutamine was measured.

RESULTS

On increasing baseline dysfunction severity, both the magnitude of the response to dobutamine ( 2 SD 3 SD 4 SD +/- 5 SD [n = 15] = 9+/-13%, > 5 SD [n = 13] = 3+/-4%, p = 0,0001), and the number of patients with a significant (> or =15%) positive response ( 2 SD 3 SD 4 SD 5 SD = 0%, p<0,0001) decreased. There were no differences in dobutamine improvement among the subgroups with (n = 84) or without (n = 11) significant stenosis in the infarction artery (18+/-15 vs. 16 +/-18%), or between the subgroups with a patent (n = 76, 18+/-19%) or occluded (n = 19, 11+/-11%) artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Dobutamine response is related to dysfunction severity in the infarction area: when the severity is 5 (high negative response prevalence), dobutamine testing does not seem indicate. The existence of residual coronary stenosis does not attenuate contractile reserve at low dobutamine doses.

Dobutamine echocardiography for detection of viable myocardium in ischemic cardiomyopathy

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, revascularization of hibernating or stunned myocardium can result in improvement in global systolic function and prognosis. The recognition that revascularization can alter the course of ischemic cardiomyopathy has fueled the development of noninvasive methods for detection of viable myocardium. Dobutamine echocardiography has established utility as a method for identifying hibernating and stunned myocardium thereby improving the selection of candidates with ischemic cardiomyopathy for revascularization. This manuscript reviews the rationale and methodology for use of low and high dose dobutamine echocardiography for detection of viable myocardium. The predictive value of the technique is discussed and compared with that of other noninvasive imaging methods.

Echocardiography for the assessment of myocardial viability

The identification of viable myocardium in the setting of acute myocardial infarction or chronic coronary artery disease with reduced left ventricular function has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. Many noninvasive methods have been used to assess viability, and recently, dobutamine stress echocardiography has been studied for this purpose. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is a safe, accessible, and relatively inexpensive technique. Moreover, its accuracy for detecting viability approaches that of positron emission tomography and thallium scintigraphy. In addition to dobutamine stress echocardiography, other echocardiographic techniques, such as myocardial contrast echocardiography and dipyridamole stress echocardiography, are being developed to delineate viability. In the future, echocardiographic methods may identify viability with enough accuracy to allow us to better select patients for revascularization procedures when the indications are otherwise unclear.