Genetically lean and fat sheep differ in their growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing factor

Alteration in the relationship between tanycytes and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone neurosecretory terminals following long-term metabolic manipulation in the sheep

The activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal axis is influenced by energy reserves, such that an increase or a decrease in adiposity may perturb the secretion and action of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH). This is considered to be a result of the signalling of hormones such as leptin, which act upon neuronal systems controlling GnRH secretion. Other work shows plasticity in the relationship between tanycytes and GnRH neurosecretory terminals in the median eminence across the oestrous cycle and we hypothesised that a similar plasticity may occur with altered metabolic status. We studied Lean, Normal and Fat ovariectomised ewes, which displayed differences in gonadotrophin status, and investigated the relationship between tanycytes and GnRH neuroterminals. Under both Lean and Fat conditions, an altered anatomical arrangement between these two elements was observed in the vicinity of the blood vessels of the primary plexus of the hypophysial portal blood system. These data suggest that such plasticity is an important determinant of the rate of secretion of GnRH in animals of differing metabolic status and that this also contributes to the relative hypogonadotrophic condition prevailing with metabolic extremes.

The effect of restricted feeding on growth hormone (GH) secretory patterns in genetically lean and fat wether lambs

The aim of this work was to determine whether developmental changes in growth hormone (GH) secretory patterns and carcass composition were influenced by nutrition and genotype in sheep. Four-month-old wether lambs from lean (low backfat), fat (high backfat) and control selection lines were nutritionally restricted to maintain a 28 kg live weight or given food ad libitum for 24 weeks. Plasma concentrations of GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) were measured at predetermined times and carcass composition of the animals determined at the end of the trial.

From week 3 on, restrictions in dry matter (DM) intake were observed as the ad libitum treatment group had a significantly greater intake than the restricted treatment group (7·70 v. 5·80 kg DM per week, s.e.d. = 0·81). Differences in live weight between the feeding treatments were significant (P < 0·05) at week 9. The restricted feeding regime was associated with significant reductions in plasma levels of IGF-1 but had no effect (P > 0·05) on carcass weight-adjusted carcass fat proportion at the close of the trial. The effect of food restriction on GH secretory patterns was variable. Although there was initially a suppression in mean plasma GH, there was subsequently significantly higher mean plasma GH in the restricted feeding treatment. Periodogram analysis indicated that both the absolute levels of GH and the GH secretory pattern were altered by restricted feeding. In all animals, mean and basal GH concentrations, as well as the frequency and amplitude of pulses, declined from February to March and then increased from May to July (P < 0·001).

DM intake and live weight did not differ (P > 0·05) between genotypes, however the fat genotype had greater carcass fatness than lean or control genotypes (P < 0·01). There were no consistent differences between genotypes in plasma IGF-1 concentrations. In the ad libitum treatment, the lean and control genotypes had higher plasma GH levels than the f at genotype but the pattern of GH release did not vary. Under restricted feeding, both the pattern and the level of plasma GH varied between genotypes.

It is concluded that the developmental change in GH secretory patterns is affected by nutrition but not in a consistent manner. Although restricted feeding resulted in higher mean plasma GH concentrations later in the trial, this did not result in a change in carcass composition. The biological cues which lead to increased fat deposition in older lambs need further study but plasma GH levels may not he an important mechanism in this process.

Selection for high or low backfat depth in Coopworth sheep: breeding-ewe traits

A breeding experiment in Coopworth sheep where selection was applied to backfat depth was evaluated after 14 years (1981-94). There were three self-replacing lines, two selected for increased or decreased subcutaneous fat depth, and an unselected control (average size = 51 ewes per line per year). Reproductive traits, ewe body weight and ewe fleece weight were monitored in each line as potential correlated responses. In the last 4 years studied, the fat (F), control (C) and lean (L) lines differed significantly in the proportion of ewes lambing (0·87, 0·93, 0·94 respectively), litter size at birth (1·64, 1·83 and 1·89), and lamb survival up to weaning, unadjusted for birth rank and sex (0·88, 0·81 and 0·74). The overall reproductive trait, lambs weaned per ewe joined (1·22, 1·33 and 1·26), did not differ significantly among lines. From pre-mating weights of ewes present in 1993 or 1994, means for mature ewes by line were 60·1, 62·4 and 63·3 kg, respectively (P < 0·01). Means for weight at scanning time (7 months of age) by line, as a proportion of mature weight were: 0·533, 0·561 and 0·559, respectively (P < 0·05). There were also significant line differences in ewe fleece weights, with the 1993 and 1994 data averaging 3·93, 4·05 and 4·27 kg respectively (P < 0·01). For weight of lamb weaned per ewe weaning at least one lamb, the L line had a 0·09 higher mean proportionally than the F line (P < 0·05), but for a composite trait which was a weighted combination of weight of lambs weaned and ewe fleece weight per ewe joined (with or without allowance for different ewe live weights), the L line was no longer significantly different from the F line. Repeatabilities and single-record heritabilities were also estimated for various ewe traits. The implications are that lean-lamb selection would be associated with only small changes in net reproduction, ewe fleece weight and live weight, but larger differences would be expected from selection in the opposite direction.

The effect of photoperiod on plasma hormone concentrations in wether lambs with genetic differences in body composition

The aim of this study was to determine whether the decrease in plasma growth hormone (GH) levels during a lamb's first autumn is a function of photoperiodic or developmental changes. Wether lambs (no. = 30) from Coopworth sheep selected for low (lean) or high (fat) backfat plus a randomly selected line (control) were subjected to long (16 h light: 8 h dark) or short (8 h light: 16 h dark) photoperiod over a 5-month period after the summer solstice. The animals were regularly blood sampled to determine plasma hormone concentrations. Daily food intake and weekly live weights were measured and the animals were slaughtered at the end of the trial to determine body composition.

Food intake and growth rate were greater for sheep on long than on short photoperiod but photoperiod had no major effect on carcass composition. Mean and basal plasma GH, as well as the number and amplitude of pulses, were not affected by photoperiod, however GH secretion decreased from January to May. Plasma levels ofprolactin, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), insulin and glucose were greater in animals under long than short photoperiod, while non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were unaffected by photoperiod.

Lean animals had greater mean and basal plasma GH and increased number and amplitude of pulses compared with fat animals. Prolactin concentrations were also greater in the lean than in the fat sheep, while there were no differences in insulin, glucose and NEFA levels. IGF-1 levels were higher in lean than in fat sheep under long photoperiod but lower under short photoperiod.

These results suggest that the decline in plasma GH with increasing age is not affected by photoperiod. While long photoperiod stimulates plasma prolactin and IGF-1 levels as well as intake and growth, the relationship between these parameters is unknown. Hormonal differences between lean and fat genotype sheep are found within the GH axis and prolactin but not within the gonadotropin or insulin axes.

Growth hormone pulsatility in ram lambs of genotypes selected for fatness or leanness

Although it is known that growth hormone (GH) influences body composition in ruminants, the precise role of the pattern of GH secretion is not known. We have studied the pulsatile release of GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF 1) secretion in the male progeny of rams from lines selected either for {fat genotype) or against (lean genotype) fatness. Seventy-two lambs (36 each of the fat and lean genotype) were kept on high-quality pasture and randomly allocated within genotype to treatment at 2, 3, 3·5, 4,5 or 6 months of age. The procedure, which was identical for each sampling period, was to sample each lamb through a jugular cannula every 10 min for 6 h, and then, following an overnight fast, to slaughter and analyse the carcass for fat. All blood samples were analysed for GH and samples taken each hour for total plasma IGF 1. The GH data were further analysed with the pulse detection routine PULSAR. Carcass fatness, adjusted for cold carcass weight, was greater for fat genotype animals than for the lean genotype. GH was pulsatile in all profiles but the pattern differed with time and genotype. Mean GH and pulse amplitude decreased with time but did not differ between genotype, although the lean genotype had higher mean GH at five of the six sampling periods. In contrast, GH pulse frequency and IGF 1 were significantly higher for the fat compared with the lean genotype lambs. GH mean and amplitude correlated negatively with carcass fatness in both genotypes and GH pulse frequency and total IGF 1 correlated positively with fatness for the lean genotype only. When carcass weight and genotype were fitted to these relationships, GH mean and total IGF 1 were found to have independent negative and positive effects, respectively, on carcass fatness. Because GH mean had a separate effect on fatness independent of genotype or cold carcass weight, it is likely that GH secretion influences composition by the same basic mechanism in both genotypes. However, although the slopes of these relationships did not differ significantly between the genotypes, the intercepts were significantly different indicating that over and above the basic mechanism, at any level of GH, the lean genotype lambs were leaner than the fat genotype lambs. This may indicate a measure ofGH resistance in the fat genotype lambs.

Effects of growth hormone administration on the body composition and hormone levels of genetically fat sheep

Coopworth sheep selected for low (lean) or high (fat) backfat have large differences in plasma GH profiles. Fat genotype ram lambs (5 months old) were treated with growth hormone (GH) to simulate the plasma GH profiles of lean sheep and investigate whether exogenous GH could modify carcass fatness. For 77 days, bovine GH was administered at 25 Uglkg live weight per day either as a single, daily subcutaneous bolus (fat bolus) or via portable pulsatile infusion pumps (fat pump) which delivered GH solution at 90-min intervals into a jugular catheter. Measurements of body composition were made by computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonic scanning during the trial, with linear carcass measurements and proximate analysis undertaken at the end of the experiment.

Before treatments began, mean plasma GH levels were lower (P < 0·01) in fat control (0·34 ugll) than in lean lambs (1·1 μg/l). Several weeks after the start of the trial, mean plasma GH had increased in both fat bolus (1·2 μg/l) and fat pump (0·45 μg/l) treatment lambs with major changes in the pulsatility relative to the fat control lambs. Although these changes were maintained in the fat bolus lambs, by the end of the trial there was no significant difference in mean plasma GH between fat pump and fat control sheep. Throughout the trial, plasma 1GF-1 levels were higher in fat bolus, fat pump and lean lambs than in fat control lambs. Analysis of body composition data over the GH treatment period revealed that the slope of the allometric equation for total fat relative to empty body weight was lower in the fat bolus lambs (1·07) than in the lean lambs (1·50) with fat control and fat pump treatment lambs intermediate (1·30 and 1·36, respectively). Subcutaneous fat was later maturing in lean lambs than in fat control and bolus treatment lambs when regressed against total fat, with the fat pump treatment lambs being intermediate. Linear carcass measurements revealed changes due to GH administration in the distribution of subcutaneous fat and eye muscle dimensions.

It is concluded that sheep from the fat genotype show physiological responses to exogenous GH. Increasing plasma GH levels of fat sheep increased plasma IGF-1 and had variable effects on carcass fatness. The change in body composition may be affected by the mode of administration of exogenous GH.

Periconceptional growth hormone treatment alters fetal growth and development in lambs

Research in the area of fetal programming has focused on intrauterine growth restriction. Few studies have attempted to examine programming mechanisms that ultimately lead to lambs with a greater potential for postnatal growth. We previously demonstrated that treatment of ewes with GH at the time of breeding led to an increase in birth weight. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effects of a single injection of sustained-release GH given during the periconceptional period on fetal growth and development and to determine if the GH axis would be altered in these offspring. Estrus was synchronized using 2 injections of PGF(2alpha); at the time of the second injection, ewes assigned to treatment were also given an injection of sustained-release GH. A maternal jugular vein sample was taken weekly to analyze IGF-I as a proxy for GH to estimate the duration of the treatment effect. In ewes treated with GH, IGF-I increased (P < 0.05) by wk 1 and remained elevated until wk 4 postinjection. Lambs were weighed, crown-rump length and abdominal girth were determined, and a plasma sample was collected. In a subset of male lambs, liver, heart, and brain weights were obtained, as well as left and right ventricular wall thicknesses. On postnatal d 100, a subset of ewe lambs were weighed and challenged with an intravenous injection of GHRH. Lambs from treated ewes had increased (P < 0.05) birth weight and abdominal girth compared with control lambs; however, there was no difference in crown-rump length. Expression of GH receptor and IGF-I were increased (P < 0.05) in lambs gestated by GH-treated ewes compared with control ewes. The left ventricular wall was thinner (P < 0.05) from lambs in the GH-treated group compared with control lambs. On postnatal d 100, those ewe lambs born to ewes treated with GH continued to be heavier (P < 0.05) and had no IGF-I response to GHRH challenge. In conclusion, treating ewes with a single injection of GH appeared to alter fetal growth and development. Lambs born to ewes treated with GH were larger at birth and had altered organ development, which may indicate that early maternal GH treatment may lead to permanent changes in the developing fetus. The ewe lambs maintained their growth performance to at least 100 d of postnatal life and appeared to have an altered GH axis, as demonstrated by the altered response to GHRH.

Effects of heat stress and plane of nutrition on lactating Holstein cows: I. Production, metabolism, and aspects of circulating somatotropin

Heat stress is detrimental to dairy production and affects numerous variables including feed intake and milk production. It is unclear, however, whether decreased milk yield is primarily due to the associated reduction in feed intake or the cumulative effects of heat stress on feed intake, metabolism, and physiology of dairy cattle. To distinguish between direct (not mediated by feed intake) and indirect (mediated by feed intake) effects of heat stress on physiological and metabolic indices, Holstein cows (n = 6) housed in thermal neutral conditions were pair-fed (PF) to match the nutrient intake of heat-stressed cows (HS; n = 6). All cows were subjected to 2 experimental periods: 1) thermal neutral and ad libitum intake for 9 d (P1) and 2) HS or PF for 9 d (P2). Heat-stress conditions were cyclical with daily temperatures ranging from 29.7 to 39.2 degrees C. During P1 and P2 all cows received i.v. challenges of epinephrine (d 6 of each period), and growth hormone releasing factor (GRF; d 7 of each period), and had circulating somatotropin (ST) profiles characterized (every 15 min for 6 h on d 8 of each period). During P2, HS cows were hyperthermic for the entire day and peak differences in rectal temperatures and respiration rates occurred in the afternoon (38.7 to 40.2 degrees C and 46 to 82 breaths/min, respectively). Heat stress decreased dry matter intake by greater than 35% and, by design, PF cows had similar reduced intakes. Heat stress and PF decreased milk yield, although the pattern and magnitude (40 and 21%, respectively) differed between treatments. The reduction in dry matter intake caused by HS accounted for only approximately 35% of the decrease in milk production. Both HS and PF cows entered into negative energy balance, but only PF cows had increased (approximately 120%) basal nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations. Both PF and HS cows had decreased (7%) plasma glucose levels. The NEFA response to epinephrine did not differ between treatments but was increased (greater than 50%) in all cows during P2. During P2, HS (but not PF) cows had a modest reduction (16%) in plasma insulin-like growth factor-I. Neither treatment nor period had an effect on the ST response to GRF and there was little or no treatment effect on mean ST levels or pulsatility characteristics, but both HS and PF cows had reduced mean ST concentrations during P2. In summary, reduced nutrient intake accounted for just 35% of the HS-induced decrease in milk yield, and modest changes in the somatotropic axis may have contributed to a portion of the remainder. Differences in basal NEFA between PF and HS cows suggest a shift in postabsorptive metabolism and nutrient partitioning that may explain the additional reduction in milk yield in cows experiencing a thermal load.

Growth hormone and ghrelin receptor genes are differentially expressed between genetically lean and fat selection lines of sheep

The objective of this study was to determine whether differences in mRNA levels of key pituitary genes that regulate GH production, pituitary development, and growth were present and/or associated with divergent body composition phenotypes observed between sheep from genetically divergent lean and fat selection lines. Real-time PCR transcription profiles for pituitary specific transcription factor 1, prophet of pit1, GH, GH receptor, GH secretagogue receptor, GHRH receptor, leptin receptor, and somatostatin receptors 1 and 2 were determined in pituitary tissue. There was a difference in the amount of both GH (P < 0.001) and GH secretagogue receptor (P < 0.001) mRNA between the selection lines (5 females and 5 males per line; 20 wk of age); the lean line had greater abundance than the fat line, irrespective of which endogenous control gene was used. The results obtained for GHRH receptor were equivocal but suggestive; there were greater GHRH receptor mRNA levels (P < 0.001) in the lean line using beta-2-microglobulin as the endogenous control but not when hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were used. No difference in pituitary specific transcription factor 1, prophet of pit1, GH receptor, leptin receptor, or somatostatin receptors 1 and 2 mRNA concentration was observed between the lines. The greater abundance of GH mRNA in the pituitary somatotropes from genetically lean animals appears to be associated with increased levels of GH secretagogue receptor mRNA and possibly GHRH receptor mRNA. This suggests that the difference in GH secretion between the lines may be due to differences in the afferent signals, such as ghrelin and/or GHRH, arising from the hypothalamus, or as a result of differential pituitary sensitivity to these hormones.

Effects of selection for milk yield on growth hormone response to growth hormone releasing factor in growing Holstein calves

Bull and heifer calves (n = 81) from genetic lines of Holstein cows that differed by more than 4000 kg milk/305-d lactation were used to determine effects of selection for milk yield on growth hormone (GH) response to a GH releasing factor (GRF) analog. Calves received GRF (4 microg/100 kg BW) on 10, 56, 140, 196, 252, and 364 +/- 3 d of age. Jugular blood samples (n = 15) were obtained from -30 to 120 min relative to GRF administration. Area under the GH response curve (0 to 60 min, AUC60) was quantified after subtracting mean prechallenge GH concentrations. Data were analyzed for effects of line, age, gender, and their interactions with PROC MIXED of SAS for repeated measures and incorporated the spatial power law for unequally spaced data with age as the repeated effect. Means were considered different when P < 0.05. Prechallenge GH concentrations did not differ between lines, were greater in bulls than heifers (4.6 vs. 3.7 ng/ml), and decreased with age. The AUC60 decreased with age but did not differ between lines. Heifers responded more to GRF than bulls (1550 vs. 1336 ng x min/ml). Peak GH concentration decreased with age and was less in bulls than heifers (54.7 vs. 62.1 ng/ml) but did not differ between lines. Although plasma GH has been identified as an inheritable trait, we conclude the GH variables measured in this study were not useful in predicting genetic merit of calves from these substantially different lines of cows.

Serum luteinizing hormone, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I after releasing hormone challenge in prepubertal ewe lambs selected for twinning

Two studies evaluated hormonal markers as indicators of the onset of puberty in Debouillet sheep selected for twinning. In Trial 1, 29 ewe lambs (50 +/- 0.5 kg, 159 to 187 d of age) were given 10 microg GnRH (i.v.) on September 15 and blood was collected at 30 min intervals after the injection for 2 h. Additional samples were taken twice weekly and progesterone (P4) was measured. The day that serum P4 was greater than 1 ng/mL for 2 consecutive sampling days was classified as the day of puberty. Average day of puberty was October 12 (average age at puberty was 199 d) and ewes with values less or greater than the average were classified as early or late, respectively. Average weight at GnRH challenge was 50 kg and ewes weighing less or more were classified as light or heavy, respectively. Early ewes weighed more (P = 0.01) and reached puberty sooner (P = 0.01) than late ewes. Heavy lambs reached puberty earlier, weighed more at GnRH challenge, and had more LH area under the curve (AUC, P < 0.05) than light ewes. In Trial 2, we gave 27 ewe lambs (54 +/- 0.9 kg, 173 to 189 d of age) a single i.v. injection of 10 microg GnRH and 10 microg GHRH on September 17. Average day of puberty was October 13, average weight was 54 kg, and average age at puberty was 208 d. Categories were designated as described for Trial 1. Early lambs reached puberty sooner (P = 0.01) and weighed more (P = 0.01) than late lambs, but the puberty groups had similar LH AUC (P = 0.64) and GH AUC (P = 0.75), whereas IGF-I was greater (P = 0.01) in early puberty ewes than in late puberty ewes. Heavy lambs reached puberty earlier (P = 0.06), weighed more (P = 0.01), and tended (P = 0.11) to have more GH AUC than light ewes. No difference was observed in LH AUC or IGF-I between weight groups (P > 0.15). Results suggest that serum LH after GnRH is not a reliable indicator of the onset of puberty in ewe lambs selected for twinning, but heavier ewes tended to produce more GH after a GHRH challenge and reach puberty earlier than lighter ewe lambs.

Neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in domestic animals

Growth hormone (GH) is essential for postnatal somatic growth, maintenance of lean tissue at maturity in domestic animals and milk production in cows. This review focuses on neuroregulation of GH secretion in domestic animals. Two hormones principally regulate the secretion of GH: growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulates, while somatostatin (SS) inhibits the secretion of GH. A long-standing hypothesis proposes that alternate secretion of GHRH and SS regulate episodic secretion of GH. However, measurement of GHRH and SS in hypophysial-portal blood of unanesthetized sheep and swine shows that episodic secretion of GHRH and SS do not account for all episodes of GH secreted. Furthermore, the activity of GHRH and SS neurons decreases after steers have eaten a meal offered for a 2-h period each day (meal-feeding) and this corresponds with reduced secretion of GH. Together, these data suggest that other factors also regulate the secretion of GH. Several neurotransmitters have been implicated in this regard. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone, serotonin and gamma-aminobutyric acid stimulate the secretion of GH at somatotropes. Growth hormone releasing peptide-6 overcomes feeding-induced refractoriness of somatotropes to GHRH and stimulates the secretion of GHRH. Norepinephrine reduces the activity of SS neurons and stimulates the secretion of GHRH via alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors. N-methyl-D,L-aspartate and leptin stimulate the secretion of GHRH, while neuropeptide Y stimulates the secretion of GHRH and SS. Activation of muscarinic receptors decreases the secretion of SS. Dopamine stimulates the secretion of SS via D1 receptors and inhibits the secretion of GH from somatotropes via D2 receptors. Thus, many neuroendocrine factors regulate the secretion of GH in livestock via altering secretion of GHRH and/or SS, communicating between GHRH and SS neurons, or acting independently at somatotropes to coordinate the secretion of GH.

Differences in pituitary cell number but not cell type between genetically lean and fat Coopworth sheep

Coopworth sheep selected for low backfat (lean genotype) have been shown to have heavier pituitary glands than those selected for high backfat (fat genotype). This paper investigated whether this difference was due to an increase in pituitary cell number or cell size and whether the relative proportions of different pituitary cell types differed between the genotypes. In three separate trials, ram lambs aged 6 to 8 months were slaughtered and the pituitary glands were processed for stereological or immunocytochemical studies. The pituitary glands of lean genotype sheep were between 30 and 60% heavier than those of the fat sheep. Lean sheep had a significantly (P<0.05) larger cross-sectional area of the pituitary fossa (96.6 vs. 81.7 mm(2)) than fat genotype sheep. The pituitaries from lean sheep contained significantly more total cells than fat sheep (Trial 1: 290 vs. 183 million cells, P<0.01; Trial 2: 353 vs. 239 million cells, P <0.05). The volume of individual cells did not differ between the genotypes. Trial 3 showed that there was no difference between lean and fat sheep in the percentage of cells staining positive for the five pituitary hormones studied. It is concluded that the larger pituitary glands of lean compared to fat genotype sheep are a result of a nonspecific increase in the size of the whole gland through increased cell numbers, with no change in cell size or the relative proportion of different cell types.

Feeding-induced increases in insulin do not suppress secretion of growth hormone

Secretion of growth hormone (GH) is reduced for several hours after feeding when access to feed is restricted to a 2-hr period each day. We hypothesized that increased secretion of insulin after feeding inhibits release of GH from the anterior pituitary gland. Our objectives were to determine whether: 1) alloxan prevents concentrations of insulin from increasing after feeding steers; 2) concentrations of GH remain high after feeding alloxan-treated steers; and 3) GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) stimulates greater release of GH in alloxan-treated, than in control, steers after feeding. Steers were injected iv with either saline (control) or with alloxan (110 mg/kg) (n = 4 per group). Concentrations of insulin were not different (P = 0.61) between control and alloxan-treated steers before feeding (87.5 +/- 33.6 pmol/l). However, alloxan prevented insulin from increasing (P < 0.001) after feeding (131.8 pmol/1) compared with control steers (442.0 pmol/l) (pooled SEM = 47.5). Overall, GH was higher (P < 0.05) in alloxan-treated (6.4 ng/ml) than in control steers (3.7 ng/ml) (pooled SEM = 0.7), but GH decreased (P < 0.001) after feeding in both groups. Iv injection of GHRH stimulated release of GH 1 hr before, but not when injected 1 hr after feeding (P < 0.001). In addition, net areas under the GH curve were not significantly different between control and alloxan-treated groups. We conclude that increased concentrations of insulin after feeding do not mediate feeding-induced suppression of GH secretion in steers.

Plasma glucose and insulin levels in genetically lean and fat sheep

This study investigated whether genetically lean and fat sheep displayed differences in insulin and glucose statuses. Lean genotype sheep had significantly (P < 0.05) greater basal glucose concentrations than fat genotype sheep (4.78 versus 4.52, SED = 0. 104 mmol/l), although basal plasma insulin was not significantly different (mean 304, SEM = 37.3 pmol/l) between the genotypes. During glucose tolerance tests (GTT), carried out at 4 levels of injection: 0, 0.28, 1.39 or 2.78 mmol glucose/kg liveweight, the area under the plasma insulin curve was significantly (P < 0.05) greater for fat than lean genotype sheep, although there were no differences in any glucose parameters. There were no significant differences between genotypes in insulin or glucose concentrations during or following glucose infusion (GINF) experiments at 0, 0.09, 0.46 or 0.93 mmol glucose/kg live-weight/h over 3 hours. Elevated plasma insulin concentrations after a glucose tolerance test are concluded to be associated with increased fatness in this genetically selected line of sheep. However, the differences in insulin and glucose levels between the lean and fat genotype sheep are minor, relative to the differences in carcass composition.

Expression of obese mRNA in genetically lean and fat selection lines of sheep

Genetically separate lines of Coopworth sheep have been bred by selecting for (fat genotype) or against (lean genotype) backfat depth. Typically, the total fat content, adjusted for carcass weight, is 21.2 and 29.3% for the lean and fat lines, respectively. As a homologue of the obese gene, which shows altered expression in several forms of obesity, is also expressed in sheep, it was decided to determine whether the obese gene was differentially expressed in each line of sheep. The relative level of expression of obese mRNA was approximately twofold higher in the fat line compared with the lean line in back, omental and perirenal fat depots of ram lambs fed ad libitum or fasted for 48 h. This elevation in the fat line is most likely a secondary consequence of obesity rather than a cause. Fasting for 48 h decreased obese mRNA levels by 8.9-, 8.5-, and 4.2-fold in back, omental and perirenal fat, respectively, in the lean line, and by 8.3-, 5.7-, and 3.5-fold in back, omental and perirenal fat, respectively, in the fat line. The lean and fat lines of sheep, therefore, responded in a similar way to fasting.

The physiological effects of natural variation in growth hormone gene copy number in ram lambs

The effects of natural variation in the number of copies of the growth hormone (GH) gene on growth parameters, plasma GH profiles, and the response to GHRH challenge were compared in Coopworth ram lambs from selection lines differing in body composition and GH levels. Different genotypes at the GH locus carried two, three, or four copies of the GH gene and GH secretion was studied under ad libitum feeding conditions and in the fasted state. There were no significant effects of GH genotype on any parameters of growth or body composition. Basal serum GH concentration, GH pulse frequency, and GH pulse amplitude differed significantly with selection line and fasting, but did not differ significantly between the GH genotypes. Significant differences of subtle nature were found between the GH genotypes in their responsiveness to GHRH. For the ad libitum-fed Lean selection line animals, the first GHRH challenge resulted in a higher mean maximum response for GH1/GH1 than GH2/GH2 (P < 0.05). Between the first and the second challenges there was a decrease in maximum response for the GH1/GH1 genotype and an increase for the GH2/GH2 genotype (P < 0.05 for GH genotype main effect). The differences between GH genotypes in response to GHRH challenge suggest that polymorphism in the number of GH gene copies in sheep may have physiological implications for the function of the GH axis, which may be manifested in growing lambs only under specific genotype-environment combinations.

The effects of a duplication in the ovine growth hormone (GH) gene on GH expression in the pituitaries of ram lambs from lean and fat-selected sheep lines

Growth hormone (GH) gene expression was investigated in pituitaries of 14- to 15-month-old ram lambs from flocks selected for high (fat) or low (lean) back fat depth, which were also homozygous for a single GH gene allele, heterozygous or homozygous for a duplication in the GH gene. The pituitaries of lean sheep of all three GH genotypes were significantly heavier than those of fat sheep, but there were no pituitary weight differences between GH genotypes. No significant lean-fat selection line- or GH genotype-specific differences were measured in pituitary GH concentration. However there was a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the total pituitary content of GH in lean compared with fat animals and a significant interaction between GH genotype and lean-fat selection line (P < 0.05) was noted for GH content. No significant differences were measured in the relative concentration of GH mRNA, suggesting that the ratio of GH mRNA per mg total cellular RNA remained constant across lean-fat selection line and GH genotype. We conclude that the pituitary glands of Coopworth sheep selected for low backfat depth (lean) are bigger and have an increased GH content, but appear to contain similar concentrations of GH mRNA and immunoreactive GH as the pituitaries of fat sheep. The presence of the GH gene duplication in sheep has little measurable effect on the expression and storage of GH in the pituitary.

Somatotroph and lactotroph function in relation to growth in six-week-old pigs reared in a hot or cool environment

The influences of thermal environment and individual growth rate on somatotroph and lactotroph function were examined in 6-week-old barrows reared entirely in a hot (H: 27-32 degrees C, n = 8) or cool (C: 21 degrees C, n = 10) environment. Growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) cell contents and responses to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) or thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) were evaluated in cultured pituitary cells from each animal. Plasma GH, PRL, and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations also were monitored. Thermal environment did not affect in vitro GH secretion, cellular GH content, or plasma GH concentrations. Stimulated in vitro GH release (GHRH-basal) and plasma GH were inversely related to average daily gain (ADG, r = -.76, p < .005 and r = -.51, p < .05, respectively). Cellular GH content also declined as ADG increased (r = -.57, p < .05). Plasma IGF-1 concentrations were not affected by thermal environment and were not related to ADG. Pituitary cells from H animals secreted and contained more PRL than cells from C animals (p < .05). Plasma PRL values were correlated with ADG (r = .54, p < .05), but did not differ between thermal groups. Stimulated in vitro PRL (TRH-vehicle) secretion was positively related with ADG only in the H group (r = .97, p < .001). In contrast, cellular PRL content decreased with ADG in cells from the H barrows (r = -.8, p < .05). Lactotroph function was not related to growth in cells from C pigs. In summary, 1) heat enhanced PRL secretion and cell content; 2) growth and somatotroph function were inversely related; and 3) serum PRL and the PRL response to TRH in cells from H barrows were positively related to growth.