Early formation of thrombi on pulmonary artery catheters in cardiac surgical patients receiving high-dose aprotinin

Use of aprotinin in repeat myocardial revascularization: Cleveland Clinic experience

Preliminary findings of a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of aprotinin in patients undergoing repeat myocardial revascularization procedures are presented. Use of high- or low-dose aprotinin led to signfiicant (p < 0.001) reductions in postoperative chest tube drainage compared with placebo (720 ± 753 ml, 866 ± 1636 ml, and 1121 ± 683 ml, respectively). Aprotinin also yielded significant reductions in transfusion requirements (2.1 ± 4.2 units, 4.8 ± 11.8 units, and 4.1 ± 6.2 units). These reductions were similar in a subgroup of patients who received aspirin preoperatively. In both aprotinin groups, there was a non-significant trend toward increased risk of Q-wave myocardial infarction. In six of 12 vein grafts studied at post-mortem examination from aprotinin-treated patients, acute vein graft thrombosis was found. This was not seen in any of five grafts from placebo-treated patients. In conclusion, aprotinin significantly reduces bleeding and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing repeat myocardial revascularization. The non-significantly increased risk of graft thrombosis requires further study.

Role of perioperative monitoring in diagnosis of massive intraoperative cardiopulmonary embolism

Massive thrombotic intraoperative pulmonary emboli (IOPE) is rare but carries a great degree of morbidity and mortality. This is the first study to formally assess the utility of various tools for the diagnosis of these events and the impact of each tool on mortality. Due to both the infrequent occurrence of these events and the high mortality of massive IOPE, it was cost-prohibitive to prospectively randomize patients to study commonly used diagnostic tools. Hence, a descriptive review of all reported cases in the literature was performed. This review yielded 146 cases for past 4 decades. Following a careful review of these cases, the alerting monitor for the occurrence of IOPE was recorded. Furthermore, we recorded the confirming diagnostic tool and the outcome of these patients. We compared 4 monitoring tools: (1) end-tidal carbon dioxide; (2) central catheter pressures; (3) echocardiography; and (4) standard monitoring of vital signs. Pre-event use of transesophageal echocardiography had no survival benefit. End-tidal carbon dioxide changes as an alerting tool were associated with improved survival compared to changes in vital signs (P<0.0001). Signs of right heart strain were associated with greater mortality, but direct thrombus visualization was not. Echocardiography appears to be useful for diagnosis of massive IOPE. Compared with hemodynamic collapse, end-tidal carbon dioxide decline as the presenting sign of massive IOPE may be associated with a better prognosis because it may represent earlier detection of IOPE and allow for more time to intervene.

Aprotinin and classic wound drainage are unnecessary in total hip replacement - a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Classic wound drainage is still common in hip replacement but its benefit is doubtful. The role of systemic administration of proteinase inhibitors like aprotinin to avoid perioperative blood loss is still unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective randomized trial, the perioperative blood loss in alloplastic hip replacement under the influence of proteinase inhibitor (aprotinin, Trasylol®) using wound drainage as well as compression treatment alone were compared. 80 patients were prospectively randomized in 4 arms. Patients received either aprotinin or placebo during surgery as well as drainage or targeted external wound compression.

RESULTS

Observing the "drug therapy" aprotinin had no effect on the intra- or postoperative blood loss (p>0.05), a trend to lower postoperative hemoglobin decline was found, but without significance. Thrombosis occurred in neither the aprotinin nor in the placebo group. Two patients had a severe allergic drug reaction and were excluded from the study. Under "non drug therapy" with compression therapy and wound drainage a significant difference in blood loss was found (p<0.001). The blood loss was higher under the wound drainage. There was no influence on the infection rate. Yet we could observe increased bruising under the sole external compression treatment.

CONCLUSION

The administration of aprotinin did not achieve the desired reduction of perioperative blood loss. Hence, costs and two severe allergic drug reactions in our study represent arguments against its use in regular treatment. Furthermore, it seems that wound drainage is neglectable in hip replacement and can be substituted by a sole compression treatment.

Fatal pulmonary microthrombi during surgical therapy for end-stage heart failure: Possible association with antifibrinolytic therapy

BACKGROUND

Maintaining hemostasis in patients with end-stage heart failure undergoing cardiac surgery is always challenging. These patients have chronic hepatic insufficiency, resulting in derangement of coagulation. In addition, they are commonly receiving both systemic anticoagulation (warfarin or heparin) and antiplatelet therapy. The introduction of antifibrinolytics has had a significant effect on postoperative coagulopathy. We report fatal pulmonary microthrombi in patients receiving antifibrinolytics who developed suprasystemic pulmonary artery pressures and right heart failure that was impossible to overcome despite insertion of a right ventricular assist device.

METHODS

We reviewed the surgical procedure and autopsy reports to identify patients with high pulmonary artery pressures caused by pulmonary microthrombi after a cardiac surgical procedure for end-stage heart failure. Patient demographics and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected from a retrospective review of the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

We identified 9 patients (7 men and 2 women; mean age, 45 +/- 16 years) who died of pulmonary microthrombi after cardiac surgery between January 1997 and January 2004. Surgical procedures included 5 left ventricular assist device implantations, 2 heart transplantations, and 2 left ventricular reconstructions with mitral valve repair or replacement. Eight patients received aprotinin, and 1 patient received epsilon-aminocaproic acid immediately before and during cardiopulmonary bypass. All patients had severe suprasystemic pulmonary artery pressures after protamine administration for heparin reversal, a complication that proved fatal in all cases. Intraoperative wedge biopsy of the lungs revealed multiple microthrombi within capillaries and in the small- and medium-sized pulmonary arterioles.

CONCLUSION

We report 9 cases for which fatal pulmonary microthrombi might be associated with the use of prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy. Mortally ill patients with multiorgan failure who are receiving systemic anticoagulation and undergoing surgical procedures require careful perioperative monitoring to identify potential hazards. Anticoagulation and antifibrinolytic therapy protocols may require adjustment in such patients.

Cardiopulmonary bypass and mitral valve replacement during pregnancy

Gravid patient cardiopulmonary bypass remains a high-risk procedure with regard to fetal preservation. Maternal mortality is similar to that of the nonpregnant female at 1.5-5%. However, fetal mortality remains high at 16-33%, with an average of 19% over the past 25 years, with no correlation to gestational age. Teratogenesis is a major consideration in the first trimester. Variations in the timing of surgical intervention, gestational age, maternal health status, type of procedure, pre- or postorganogenesis, perfusion protocol, and pharmaceutical therapy are all factors that can influence fetomaternal outcome. In this report, we present a literature review along with our experience of a 26-year-old female who developed complications with her pregnancy at approximately 17 weeks gestation, with adverse neurological sequelae. The patient was 152 cm in height and weighed 48 kg, with a calculated body surface area of 1.40 M2. She had no prior history of cardiac disease and, upon admission to our institution, presented with a declining health status in pulmonary edema and was treated medically, with an ultimate requirement for mitral valve replacement. The total cardiopulmonary bypass time was 99 min with an aortic crossclamp time of 83 min. The literature, as expected, is limited to case reports and reviews since a controlled clinical trial during pregnancy is nonexistent, using extracorporeal circulation. This greatly challenges the medical staff in managing such difficult cases, with an incidence of heart disease during pregnancy of 1.2-3.7%.

Perioperative systemic haemostatic agents

Skilful surgery combined with blood-saving methods and careful management of blood coagulation will all help reduce unnecessary blood loss and transfusion requirements. Excessive surgical bleeding causes hypovolaemia, haemodynamic instability, anaemia and reduced oxygen delivery to tissues, with a subsequent increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. The role of anaesthetists in managing surgical blood loss has increased greatly in the last decade. Position of the patient during surgery and the provision of a hypotensive anaesthetic regimen were once considered the most important contributions of the anaesthetist to decreasing blood loss. Now, several pharmacological haemostatic agents are being used by anaesthetists as blood-saving agents. After a brief discussion of the physiology of haemostasis, this article will review the evidence for the role of such agents in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.

Intravascular thrombosis and thromboembolism during liver transplantation: antifibrinolytic therapy implicated?

This case report describes a patient who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation and developed extensive hyperacute venous and arterial intravascular thromboses and thromboemboli intraoperatively. The patient was receiving antifibrinolytic therapy with aprotinin. The safety of routine aprotinin therapy in liver transplantation is examined. The value of the thrombelastograph (TEG) as a qualitative assessment of the coagulation system is emphasized.

Current status of antifibrinolytics in cardiopulmonary bypass and elective deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) results in many physiologic derangements, including activation of the hemostatic and fibrinolytic pathways. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) adds a further insult to the coagulation systems because it involves more extreme hypothermia and organ ischemia related to blood stasis. The abnormalities induced by CPB disrupt the checks and balances in the hemostatic and fibrinolytic systems, resulting in a pathologic state that leads to excessive bleeding and other perioperative complications. Prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy can attenuate the response to this insult by restoring the delicate balance within these systems, potentially reducing the complication rate and improving patient outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of methods for reducing perioperative allogeneic transfusion: a critical review of the literature

A number of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic technologies are in current use to minimize perioperative homologous blood use. Clinical trials, many of them randomized controlled trials, have been done evaluating these approaches and have demonstrated their efficacy. However, data on safety has relied mostly on case reports, uncontrolled studies, and, for the pharmacologic agents, extrapolation from the nonsurgical setting. In this review I analyze the data from the randomized trials and the lower-level evidence studies to provide the best estimates in safety with these alternatives. In general, these alternatives are safe with proper dosing and monitoring of effects. With aprotinin, the primary concern is anaphylaxis, and this predominantly with re-exposure. With aprotinin and with the anti-fibrinolytics, increased venous thromboembolic risk has not been a consistent finding. Tranexamic acid use intraoperatively is advantageous, but postoperative use appears to have no advantage and may be associated with renal dysfunction. DDAVP is low-risk, provided it is not overused, which can induce hyponatremia. Autologous predonation probably has similar risks as homologous blood with respect to transfusion errors and bacterial infection. As with most medical interventions, we must be vigilant to prevent human error.

Mechanisms and attenuation of hemostatic activation during extracorporeal circulation

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are at risk for excessive microvascular bleeding, which often leads to transfusion of allogeneic blood and blood components as well as reexploration in a smaller subset of patients. Excessive bleeding after cardiac surgery is generally related to a combination of several alterations in the hemostatic system pertaining to hemodilution, excessive activation of the hemostatic system, and potentially the use of newer, longer-acting antiplatelet or antithrombotic agents. Although several nonpharmacologic strategies have been proposed, this review summarizes the role of pharmacologic interventions as means to attenuate the alterations in the hemostatic system during CPB in an attempt to reduce excessive bleeding, transfusion, and reexploration. Specifically, agents that inhibit platelets, fibrinolysis, factor Xa and thrombin, as well as broad-spectrum agents, have been investigated with respect to their role in reducing consumption of clotting factors and better preservation of platelet function. Prophylactic administration of agents with antifibrinolytic, anticoagulant, and possibly antiinflammatory properties can decrease blood loss and transfusion. Although aprotinin seems to be the most effective blood conservation agent (which is most likely related to its broad-spectrum nature), agents with isolated antifibrinolytic properties may be as effective in low-risk patients. The ability to reduce blood product transfusions and to decrease operative times and reexploration rates favorably affects patient outcomes, availability of blood products, and overall health care costs.

Aprotinin reduces blood loss and the need for transfusion in orthognathic surgery

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial (n= 15 in each group) showed that patients given aprotinin intravenously (200 ml, [2000000 kallikrein inactivator units] before the operation and then 50 ml per h until the end of the operation) during simultaneous maxillary Le Fort 1 and mandibular sagittal split osteotomies, lost 52% less blood than controls (calculated by subtracting the volume of saline irrigant used from the volume of blood collected in the aspirator bottle and surgical drains). Patients given aprotinin lost a mean (SD) of 473 (190) ml compared with 986 (356) ml in controls. They also required significantly less transfused blood (1 was given 2 units in the aprotinin group compared with 9 given a mean of 1.5 units (range 1-4) in the control group). There were no complications attributable to this drug.

Thrombogenicity of prothrombin complex concentrates

Thrombogenicity of factor IX complex or prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) is a well-acknowledged problem. The exact incidence is unknown but has decreased with the improvement of the quality of coagulation factor concentrates and a more judicious use of these products. The clinical spectrum of thrombogenicity ranges from superficial thrombophlebitis, deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and arterial thrombosis to disseminated intravascular coagulation. Several risk factors have been identified: (a) predisposing clinical factors (underlying disease and clinical condition), (b) therapy factors (dosing, concomitant therapy and drug interactions), and (c) quality of the PCC used. It is generally assumed that the risk of thromboembolic adverse effects is greater in patients with acquired disorders of hemostasis than in patients with inherited coagulation factor deficiencies. In hemophilia B, clinical conditions with an increased risk include large muscle hematomas, immobilization, surgery (especially orthopedic surgery), and liver disease. In acquired disorders of hemostasis, a prethrombotic state can be assumed in all patients where an indication for PCC concentrates is considered. Liver disease and/ or antithrombin deficiency are considered as major risk factors. Therapy factors with an increased risk include large, repetitive doses of PCC. It is assumed that heparin and, in the case of antithrombin deficiency, antithrombin substitution decrease the incidence of thromboembolic adverse effects. Heparin neutralisation with protamine and aprotinin therapy may be additional risk factors. The declining incidence and the recent cluster of fatal thromboembolic adverse events in Germany with one brand of PCC is strong evidence for the crucial role of the quality of PCC in the occurrence of thromboembolic adverse effects.

Aprotinin versus lysine analogues: the debate continues

The decision to use any pharmacologic intervention inevitably rests on balancing the efficacy and safety of the intervention. The advent of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome epidemic greatly increased awareness of transfusion-related illnesses and focused attention on methods to prevent the need for blood and blood products. This has led, especially in the last decade, to increased use of drugs to help reduce perioperative bleeding. This chapter focuses on the lysine analogues and aprotinin as the serine protease inhibitor currently available in clinical practice. Both groups of compounds have recently shown promise in reducing surgical bleeding. However, the reader will notice that none of these agents are new; they have all been available for more than 30 years. What is new is their use in preventing bleeding. We therefore have considerable knowledge regarding the safety of these compounds. The first part of this review will compare the actions of these two types of agents on the processes related to thrombosis, hemostasis, and fibrinolysis. This is followed by a comparison of the efficacy of each intervention and any dose-response relationship. This section highlights the reported reduction in postoperative bleeding with both classes of agent. There is, however, no obvious or consistent reduction in the transfusion of blood and blood products in patients given lysine analogues. In contrast, there is a consistent reduction in the need for blood transfusions in patients given aprotinin therapy. The next major section will discuss the evidence to suggest that these drugs may, because of their known effects on the processes related to inflammation, hemostasis, and cellular repair, contribute to an improvement or worsening of outcome after cardiac operations. In particular, this section focuses on the antiinflammatory actions and modifications in vascular tone associated with aprotinin therapy. These effects may be related to improved outcome in patients by reducing the incidence of permanent neurologic deficit or stroke after heart operations, as well as inhibiting pulmonary vascular hyperreactivity and hypertension in susceptible individuals. Finally, this brief review discusses the safety issues that have been raised in regard to each of these classes of agents, specifically problems associated with abnormal renal function, hypersensitivity reactions, and thrombotic complications.

The effects of epsilon-aminocaproic acid on fibrinolysis and thrombin generation during cardiac surgery

Despite the efficacy of antifibrinolytic drugs in reducing bleeding after cardiac surgery, concerns remain regarding their potential to promote thrombosis. We examined the effect of the antifibrinolytic drug, epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) on fibrinolysis and thrombin generation during cardiac surgery. Forty-one adults undergoing primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were prospectively randomized in a double-blind trial to receive either saline or EACA. A loading dose of 150 mg/kg EACA was given before anesthetic induction, followed by a 15 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) infusion, which continued until 3 h after CPB. Plasma samples for the measurement of D-dimer, thrombin-antithrombin III, and soluble fibrin were obtained before surgery, 1 h on CPB, and 3 and 20 h after CPB. In the EACA group, fibrinolytic activity, as measured by D-dimer, was significantly decreased 3 h after CPB, (0.51 +/- 0.15 mg/L vs 1.13 +/- 0.14 mg/L, P < 0.005). Decreased fibrinolytic activity was accompanied by decreased bleeding in the EACA group (660 +/- 127 mL vs 931 +/- 113 mL, P < 0.05). No differences in the generation of thrombin or soluble fibrin were apparent between the two groups. Suppression of fibrinolytic activity in the absence of concomitant reductions in thrombin generation suggests that EACA could potentiate a hypercoagulable prethrombotic state in the perioperative setting.

IMPLICATIONS

In a randomized, prospective trial of primary cardiac surgery, we demonstrated that the synthetic antifibrinolytic drug epsilon-aminocaproic acid suppresses fibrinolysis with no effects on thrombin generation. These results suggest the potential for synthetic antifibrinolytic drugs to induce a hypercoagulable prethrombotic state in the perioperative setting.

Hemostatic Drugs in Prothrombotic or Hypercoagulable States

Certain drug therapies, such as heparin, warfarin, and aspirin, are associated with prothrombotic or hypercoagulable states. If these agents that are administered to prevent thrombosis have been associated with its opposite effect, then agents that are specifically given to inhibit bleeding may produce a deleterious hypocoagulable effect. This article evaluates the risks presented by serine protease inhibitors (ie, aprotinin), lysine analog antifibrinolyics (ie, epsilon aminocaproic acid [Amicar, Wyeth-Ayerst, Philadelphia, PA] and tranexamic acid), and desmopressin acetate (DDAVP, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA). It focuses on their mechanisms of action, particularly their effect on microvascular tone and endothelial function, coagulation factors, platelet function, and the fibrinolytic pathway. It discusses their use in the presence of known thrombin production or fibrinogen conversion and whether certain vascular beds are more prone to drug-related thrombosis.

Antifibrinolytic drugs and perioperative hemostasis

Although excessive bleeding is widely recognized as a common complication of cardiac surgery, the recent success of antifibrinolytic drugs as prophylactic hemostatic agents has received little attention outside the surgical literature. The etiology of the coagulopathy following cardiac surgery is clearly multifactorial; however, the success of antifibrinolytic drugs as hemostatic agents suggests that fibrinolysis contributes to bleeding in this setting. Increasingly widespread administration of these drugs necessitates increased awareness of the risks and benefits posed by perioperative antifibrinolytic therapy. The objectives of this review are to understand the mechanisms of action of antifibrinolytic drugs in the context of the normal hemostatic response and to review evidence pertaining to the efficacy and safety of antifibrinolytic drugs as hemostatic agents during cardiac surgery.

Continuous small-dose tranexamic acid reduces fibrinolysis but not transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver transplantation

Tranexamic acid (TA) is a synthetic drug that inhibits fibrinolysis. It has been administered to decrease the use of blood products during cardiac surgery and orthotopic liver transplantation when infused in larger doses. A small-dose infusion of aprotinin causes a reduction in fibrinolysis and blood product requirement during orthotopic liver transplantation without apparent risk of intravascular thrombosis. This prospective study was designed to investigate whether a small-dose infusion of TA would be equally effective in reducing fibrinolysis and blood product transfusions during orthotopic liver transplantation. A double-blind, controlled study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of a small-dose TA infusion with that of a placebo. Thirty-two consecutive patients were randomized either to the TA group (n = 16), which received an intravenous infusion of 2 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1), or to the control group (n = 16), which received an identical volume of normal saline. Coagulation values were measured, a field rating was made by the surgeon, and a thromboelastogram was produced at four predetermined intervals throughout the case-before TA infusion was started, after portal vein ligation, 10 min after reperfusion, and at the end of surgery. Intraoperative transfusion requirements were recorded during the procedure and for the first 24 h postoperatively. A record was kept of any intraoperative epsilon-aminocaproic acid administered for uncontrolled fibrinolysis. The thromboelastogram clot lysis index was significant for lysis in the control group during both the anhepatic and the neohepatic phases (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively) when compared with the TA group. Fibrin degradation products were significantly increased (>20 microg/mL) in the control group at reperfusion (P < 0.03) and at the end of surgery (P < 0.01). D-dimers were also significantly increased (>1 mg/L) in the control group at the end of surgery (P < 0.04). Nine of the 16 control patients versus 3 of the 16 TA patients required epsilon-aminocaproic acid rescue for fibrinolysis. There were no other significant differences between groups. Transfusion requirements during surgery and for the first 24 h postoperatively did not differ significantly between the two groups. We conclude that the use of small-dose TA reduces fibrinolysis but not transfusion requirements during orthotopic liver transplantation.

Effects of minimal-dose aprotinin on coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of minimal-dose aprotinin in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, we conducted a prospective randomized study.

METHODS

A total of 167 patients were randomized to receive no aprotinin treatment (control, n = 57), minimal-dose aprotinin (1.0 x 10(6) KIU; n = 55), or low-dose aprotinin (2.7 +/- 0.5 x 10(6) KIU; n = 55). Blood loss and transfusion requirements, parameters of clotting and fibrinolysis, renal function, and early graft patency rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements were significantly (p = 0.01) lower in both the minimal-dose and low-dose groups than in the control group. The increase in D-dimer level after cardiopulmonary bypass was significantly (p < 0.05) less marked in the low-dose group than in the control group. The alpha 2-plasmin inhibitor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels were significantly (p < 0.05) greater in the minimal-dose and low-dose groups than in the control group after bypass, suggesting the prevention of fibrinolysis by both aprotinin doses. No statistically significant differences in postoperative renal function and early vein graft patency rates were noted (control group, 93.8%; minimal-dose group, 95.5%; low-dose group, 92.3%; p = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin was not associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of renal dysfunction or early vein graft occlusion. Minimal-dose aprotinin inhibited enhanced fibrinolytic activity and reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements after bypass equivalently to low-dose aprotinin. The dose of 1 x 10(6) KIU added to the pump prime may be acceptably effective in reducing blood loss in patients undergoing primary coronary operations.

Reduction in requirements for allogeneic blood products: pharmacologic methods

BACKGROUND

Numerous articles describe the reduction of perioperative bleeding by the therapeutic or prophylactic administration of drugs such as prostacyclin, desmopressin, and natural or synthetic antifibrinolytics.

METHODS

A review of the literature was carried out to help the reader define the indications of these drugs during cardiopulmonary bypass operations, highlight the questions that remain concerning their indications and modes of action, and suggest future studies to answer these remaining questions.

RESULTS

Prostacyclin reduces platelet trauma induced by extracorporeal circulation but does not effectively reduce postoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements. Desmopressin acts as a "glue," improving platelet adhesion, and may be effective when postoperative bleeding is excessive, but its routine use in cardiac operations cannot be recommended. Natural and synthetic antifibrinolytics inhibit plasmin and plasmin-induced platelet dysfunction. These agents have been shown to decrease bleeding and the need for allogeneic transfusions after open heart operations. However, with antifibrinolytic drugs, the risk of thromboembolic phenomena cannot be neglected. With aprotinin, this risk appears to be minimal when the drug is used at concentrations high enough to inhibit plasma kallikrein also.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic antifibrinolytics are efficacious, but their routine use remains controversial, both for economic reasons and for fear of thromboembolic complications.

Low-dose and high-dose aprotinin improve hemostasis in coronary operations

Prophylactic aprotinin therapy has become a popular method to reduce bleeding associated with cardiac operations. Today essentially two dose regimens are used, a high-dose regimen with administration throughout the complete operative procedure and a low-dose regimen with administration only during bypass. In unblinded studies both regimens were found to be equally effective. This double-blind placebo-controlled study in 115 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting was done to confirm these results without potential investigator bias. Intraoperative hemoglobin loss was significantly reduced (p < 0.01) by 42% in the high-dose group and by 17% in the low-dose group compared with loss in control subjects. Blood loss 6 hours after operation was 377 ml in the low-dose and 266 ml in the high-dose group compared with 630 ml in the placebo group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). The average number of transfusions with packed red blood cells was reduced 31% in the low-dose group and 45% in the high-dose group, but the reductions were not significant. In a subgroup of patients, markers for coagulation and fibrinolysis were studied to investigate whether a different extent of activation existed. Fibrinolysis as measured by D-dimer levels was completely inhibited by the high-dose regimen, but was only partly suppressed in the low-dose group as compared with findings in the placebo group. Thrombin generation during cardiopulmonary bypass as reflected by F1 + 2 levels was lower in patients treated with aprotinin, but the difference was not significant. Concentrations of thrombin inactivated by antithrombin III were not different between the groups. The observation that low-dose aprotinin significantly improved hemostasis but did not inhibit hyperfibrinolysis supports our previous finding that low-dose aprotinin mainly protects platelet adhesive function. The better result obtained with high-dose aprotinin may indicate the contribution of hyperfibrinolysis to bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass. Because high-dose aprotinin is administered outside the period of full heparinization and might therefore increase the risk of thromboembolic complications, we propose a modification of the low-dose schedule to increase aprotinin levels sufficient for plasmin inhibition before release of the aortic crossclamp.

Aprotinin prolongs activated and nonactivated whole blood clotting time and potentiates the effect of heparin in vitro

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of aprotinin on activated versus nonactivated whole blood clotting time using two different on-site methods and to quantify these anticoagulant properties when compared to heparin in a controlled, in vitro environment. Blood specimens were obtained prior to heparin administration from 56 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Specimens obtained from the first consecutive 20 patients were mixed with either normal saline (NS) or aprotinin (400 kallikrein inhibiting units (KIU)/mL), inserted into Hemochron tubes containing either NS or heparin (0.3 or 0.6 U/mL) and then used to measure celite-activated (celite ACT) and nonactivated whole blood clotting time (WBCT1) using four Hemochron instruments. Accordingly, specimens obtained from the second consecutive 20 patients were mixed with either NS or aprotinin, inserted into Automated Clot Timer cartridges containing either NS or heparin (0.06, 0.13, or 0.25 U/mL) and then used to measure kaolin-activated (kaolin ACT) or nonactivated whole blood clotting times (WBCT2) using four Automated Clot Timer instruments. Specimens obtained from the last 16 patients were mixed with either incrementally larger doses of aprotinin (0, 100, 200, 300, or 400 KIU/mL) or heparin (0, 0.12, 0.24, 0.36, 0.48, or 0.72 U/mL) and were then used for measurement of whole blood clotting time (WBCT2) using six Automated Clot Timer instruments. Aprotinin significantly prolonged activated or nonactivated whole blood clotting time and potentiated the prolongation of whole blood clotting time by heparin. The linear relationship between whole blood clotting time and either heparin concentration (WBCT2 = H x 357 + 280, mean adjusted r2 = 0.88) or aprotinin concentration (WBCT2 = A x 0.97 + 300, mean adjusted r2 = 0.94) was variable among patients. On average, 200 KIU/mL of aprotinin prolonged WBCT2 to the same extent as 0.69 +/- 0.28 U/mL of heparin using linear regression models within each patient. Aprotinin significantly prolongs activated or nonactivated whole blood clotting time measurements in a dose-dependent manner. Since prolongation of whole blood clotting time by heparin is potentiated by aprotinin in vitro, aprotinin's anticoagulant properties may in part account for the prolonged celite activated clotting time values observed in the presence of aprotinin.

Effect of aprotinin on activated clotting time, whole blood and plasma heparin measurements

Twenty cardiac surgical patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled in this study designed to evaluate the effect of aprotinin on activated clotting time (kaolin and celite), whole blood, and laboratory-based plasma (anti-Xa) heparin measurements. Whole blood heparin measurements were not different (p = 0.98) between aprotinin-treated (3.2 +/- 2.8 U/mL) and control (3.2 +/- 3.0 U/mL) specimens. Plasma anti-Xa heparin measurements were also not different (p = 0.95) between aprotinin-treated (2.7 +/- 2.5 U/mL) and control (2.8 +/- 2.5 U/mL) specimens. The relationship between whole blood (plasma equivalent) and plasma heparin measurements was similar (p = 0.1) in the presence (slope, 1.04; r2 = 0.89) or absence (slope, 1.11; r2 = 0.89) of aprotinin. In contrast to weak correlations between celite (r = 0.50) or kaolin (r = 0.53) activated clotting time values, whole blood heparin measurements correlated well (r = 0.93) with plasma heparin measurements during cardiopulmonary bypass in the presence of aprotinin. These findings indicate that whole blood heparin measurements are unaffected by aprotinin and correlate well with plasma anti-Xa heparin measurements even in the presence of aprotinin. Therefore, the automated protamine titration assay can be used to monitor accurately heparin concentrations in patients receiving aprotinin.

Reheparinisation requirements after cardiopulmonary bypass in patients treated with aprotinin

OBJECTIVE

To determine reheparinisation requirements following protamine neutralisation after the discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass in a group of patients receiving "low dose" aprotinin compared with a control group.

DESIGN

Randomised, placebo controlled study.

SETTING

Regional cardiothoracic unit within a district general hospital.

PATIENTS

20 patients were consecutively allocated to one of two groups. All patients had a primary elective aortocoronary bypass operation using standard anaesthetic techniques and no patient was withdrawn from the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Aprotinin group patients (n = 9) received aprotinin (1 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU)) as an intravenous bolus after the induction of anaesthesia, and 1 x 10(6) KIU was added to the pump prime. Control group patients (n = 11) received 0.9% saline placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Activated clotting time (ACT), heparin concentration, and heparin dose response (HDR) measured before, during, and after bypass. The HDR is an accurate method to determine the patients' in vitro response to heparin and is used to predict the dose of heparin required to attain an ACT of 400 seconds.

RESULTS

Activated clotting times were similar in the two groups for the duration of the study. Heparin concentrations were zero in all patients before heparin administration and after protamine neutralisation. During bypass there was no difference between the groups. The median heparin dose response was the same in the two groups before the administration of heparin, but after the neutralisation of heparin with protamine after the discontinuation of bypass the HDR was significantly higher in the aprotinin group for up to one hour (median of 2.9 IU/ml v 1.25 in the control group at 10 minutes after protamine neutralisation, P < 0.01; 2.5 v 1.45 at 30 minutes, P < 0.05; and 2.9 v 1.6 at one hour, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Heparin requirements were nearly doubled in patients treated with aprotinin, who required reheparinisation for up to one hour after protamine. This relative "heparin resistance" cannot be explained by the presence of excessive protamine. Aprotinin may be a substrate for the N-carboxypeptidase that destroys protamine, thus indirectly enhancing and prolonging the activity of protamine.

Administration of high-dose aprotinin during nonprimary cardiovascular surgery: case reports and review of the literature

The perioperative management of two patients undergoing complex "redo" cardiac surgical procedures are presented. The management of both patients included the prophylactic administration of aprotinin via a "compassionate use" protocol. Aprotinin, a serine protease inhibitor, has been shown to limit the exposure to blood and blood products in patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgical procedures. In late December 1993, the Food and Drug Administration approved aprotinin for administration to cardiac surgical patients considered at high risk for post-cardiopulmonary bypass coagulopathies. Indications for the administration of aprotinin, as well as a brief review of the literature relating to the perioperative administration of aprotinin, are included.

Aprotinin to decrease bleeding and intraoperative blood transfusion requirements during descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysmectomy using cardiopulmonary bypass

The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy of aprotinin, an antifibrinolytic agent, in reducing bleeding and blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysmectomy using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Sixty-nine consecutive patients underwent thoracic or thoracoabdominal aneurysmectomy using CPB in a 2-year period. None of the 29 patients operated on in 1990 (group 1) received aprotinin, whereas all 40 patients operated on in 1991 (group 2) were placed on a high-dose regimen of aprotinin. There were no significant differences between the two groups. Administration of aprotinin was associated with a decrease in CPB time (p = 0.02), surgical duration (p = 0.05) and intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.008) as well as a reduction in intraoperative packed red cells (p = 0.01), Cell-Saver units (p = 0.05), fresh-frozen plasma units (p = 0.002), and platelet concentrate (p = 0.01) requirements. These data suggest that aprotinin is effective in reducing bleeding and blood transfusion requirements during descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysmectomy using CPB.

Randomized study of aprotinin and DDAVP to reduce postoperative bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have an increased susceptibility to postoperative bleeding. Previous reports using desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) for the prevention of postoperative bleeding have given contradictory results, whereas the protease inhibitor aprotinin has been shown to reduce blood loss after this type of surgery. This randomized study was performed to assess the efficacy of DDAVP versus aprotinin in the prevention of bleeding after CPB.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred nine of 122 eligible patients were randomized to four different groups: Group A (n = 28) received aprotinin starting with a bolus of 2 x 10(6) KIU followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 x 10(6) KIU/h until the end of surgery; group B (n = 25) received of DDAVP 0.3 micrograms/kg i.v. on completion of CPB; group C (n = 28) received two doses of DDAVP, the first as in group B and an additional dose 6 hours after surgery; group D (n = 28) received no treatment. There was a marked reduction of postoperative blood loss either at 12 hours (P < .01) or 72 hours (P < .02) in the aprotinin group compared with all other groups, whereas no significant effect was observed in either of the two DDAVP regimens. A significant reduction in the amount of blood used was observed only in the aprotinin group (P < .01). Of the plasma fibrinolytic components assayed, there was a significant reduction of the fibrin degradation product generation in the aprotinin group (P < .001), whereas a significant systemic hyperfibrinolysis was observed in both DDAVP-treated groups and the control group. No side effects related to the study drugs were observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin inhibited fibrinolysis; this correlated with a significant reduction of postoperative blood loss and need for blood replacement after CPB. Neither one nor two doses of DDAVP had a beneficial effect. Aprotinin offers a better alternative than DDAVP in the prevention of bleeding after CPB.

Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study of three aprotinin regimens in primary cardiac surgery

The serine proteinase inhibitor aprotinin significantly reduces postoperative blood loss in patients requiring cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass. This study compared two low-dose regimens with administration of high-dose aprotinin and a control protocol to determine whether the dose of aprotinin could be greatly decreased but still maintain efficacy after primary cardiac surgery. Some 100 patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups: control group (0.9 per cent saline placebo, n = 25); high-dose group (aprotinin 2 x 10(6) kallikrein inactivator (KI) units intravenous patient bolus and 0.5 x 10(6) KI units h-1 plus 2 x 10(6) KI units into pump prime, n = 25); prime group (aprotinin 2 x 10(6) KI units added to the pump prime, n = 24); and patient group (aprotinin 10(6) KI units intravenous patient bolus plus 10(6) KI units added to the pump prime, n = 26). Only patients from the high-dose and patient groups had reduced intraoperative blood loss, but patients from all three aprotinin-treated groups demonstrated a significant decrease in median postoperative blood loss compared with the control group (high-dose 350 ml, prime 420 ml, patient 340 ml versus control 780 ml; P < 0.001). There was an even greater reduction in measured median postoperative haemoglobin loss within the chest drains in the treated compared with the control patients (high-dose 15 g, prime 24 g, patient 14 g versus control 47 g; P < 0.001). These decreases were statistically the same for all the treated groups; it is possible to lower the dose of aprotinin to approximately one-third of the currently recommended dosage and still obtain significantly reduced postoperative blood loss in primary cardiac surgery.

Randomised placebo controlled double blind study of two low dose aprotinin regimens in cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether two low dose aprotinin regimens produce clinically significant reductions in postoperative blood loss compared with a control group.

DESIGN

A randomised double blind placebo controlled study.

SETTING

A regional cardiothoracic unit in London.

PATIENTS

79 patients were consecutively allocated to one of three groups. All patients had primary elective surgery with standard anaesthetic and surgical techniques, and no patients were withdrawn from the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Group K patients (n = 27) received aprotinin (10(6) kallikrein inactivator units (KIU) into the pump prime whereas group L patients (n = 27) received an intravenous bolus of aprotinin (0.5 x 10(6) KIU) after induction of anaesthesia and 10(6) KIU was added to the pump prime. A third group (group J, n = 25) received 0.9% saline placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

After insertion of the chest drains at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, blood losses were measured hourly until the drains were removed 18 to 24 h later. Total haemoglobin loss into the chest drains was calculated.

RESULTS

Both aprotinin treated groups showed significantly less postoperative blood loss than controls (medians: group K, 400 ml; group L, 400 ml; v controls 780 ml; p < 0.001) and there was even less measured postoperative haemoglobin loss within the chest drains in both the aprotinin treated groups than in the controls (medians: group K, 16 g; group L, 19 g; v controls, 47 g; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In primary cardiac surgery the dose of aprotinin may be reduced by about 80% from the recommended high dose schedule and still significantly reduce postoperative blood loss compared with placebo.

Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization: a placebo-controlled study

We tested the efficacy and safety of aprotinin in 169 patients undergoing isolated reoperative myocardial revascularization. Patients were randomly assigned to high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, or placebo treatment groups in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, red cell mass, number of grafts, use of internal thoracic artery, or incidence of preoperative aspirin therapy. Patients treated with aprotinin had a significant reduction in postoperative chest tube drainage (720 +/- 753, 866 +/- 1,636, and 1,121 +/- 683 mL, respectively, for high-dose aprotinin, low-dose aprotinin, and placebo; p < 0.001). Transfusion requirements were reduced in aprotinin-treated patients (2.1 +/- 4.2, 4.8 +/- 11.8, and 4.1 +/- 6.2 units for high-dose, low-dose, and placebo, respectively; p < 0.001). A similar reduction in chest tube drainage and transfusion requirements was seen in patients using aspirin preoperatively. Q-wave myocardial infarctions were increased in the aprotinin subgroups (17.5%, 14.3%, and 8.9% for high-dose, low-dose, and placebo groups; not significant). Acute vein graft thrombosis was found in six of 12 vein grafts studied at postmortem examination in patients receiving aprotinin but not in any of five grafts in patients receiving placebo. We conclude that aprotinin is extremely effective in reducing bleeding and transfusion requirements and may increase the risk of graft thrombosis.

Reduction in blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass with high-dose aprotinin versus autologous fresh whole blood transfusion

Ninety patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomly divided into three groups of 30 patients to compare the effects on bleeding and transfusion requirements of either intraoperative infusion of high-dose aprotinin (GpI) or reinfusion of autologous fresh whole blood (GpII) versus a control group (GpIII). Standardized anesthetic, perfusion, and surgical techniques were used. Platelet counts, hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit, fibrinogen, and Ivy-Nelson bleeding times determined at fixed times perioperatively did not differ among the three groups. The total loss from the chest drains was significantly reduced in GpI (328 +/- 28 mL; mean +/- SEM) as compared with the loss in GpII and GpIII (775 +/- 75 mL and 834 +/- 68 mL, respectively). There was a threefold difference in the total hemoglobin loss (GpI, 14.2 +/- 1.7 g; GpII, 50.1 +/- 5.0 g; GpIII, 45.0 +/- 5.2 g). GpI patients also received less banked blood: 250 +/- 53 mL versus 507 +/- 95 mL in GpII and 557 +/- 75 mL in GpIII. No GpI patient required transfusion of platelets or fresh frozen plasma. Fresh whole autologous blood transfusions had no significant hemostatic effect and failed to reduce the homologous blood requirement. Conversely, high-dose aprotinin reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements.

Natural and synthetic antifibrinolytics in cardiac surgery

In an effort to reduce morbidity associated with transfusion of blood products, the use of antifibrinolytics to decrease bleeding and transfusions after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is receiving widespread attention. The predominant haemostatic defect induced by CPB and, therefore, the mechanisms by which natural (aprotinin) or synthetic antifibrinolytics (sigma-amino-caproic acid, tranexamic acid) exert their effects have been difficult to define. Nonetheless, all three substances appear to be effective in the treatment or in the prevention of excessive bleeding associated with cardiac surgery. However, the administration of these drugs should not attempt to replace meticulous surgical and anaesthetic care. In particular, the importance of an appropriate transfusion practice cannot be overemphasized. The efficient use of these, sometimes expensive, drugs must take into account not only the initial cost, but also the short- and long-term economic consequences for the health care provider of using, or not using, a given medication. Unfortunately, the comprehensive data on which authoritative conclusions may be reached are not yet available. Pending availability of these data, the present use of antifibrinolytics at the Montreal Heart Institute is the following: (1) patients undergoing elective primary myocardial revascularization or valve surgery do not receive prophylactic antifibrinolytics; (2) patients undergoing repeat myocardial revascularization, repeat valve surgery, or primary or repeat combined procedures, receive prophylactic sigma-aminocaproic acid; (3) sigma-aminocaproic acid may be used to treat excessive chest drainage in the postoperative period; (4) the prophylactic and the therapeutic uses of low doses of aprotinin are currently under investigation.