Low-dose dopamine during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with renal dysfunction

Dopamine in critically ill patients with cardiac dysfunction: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Background

Dopamine has been used in patients with cardiac dysfunction for more than five decades. Yet, no systematic review has assessed the effects of dopamine in critically ill patients with cardiac dysfunction.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted following The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We searched for trials including patients with observed cardiac dysfunction published until 19 April 2018. Risk of bias was evaluated and Trial Sequential Analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was all‐cause mortality at longest follow‐up. Secondary outcomes were serious adverse events, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and renal replacement therapy. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

Results

We identified 17 trials randomising 1218 participants. All trials were at high risk of bias and only one trial used placebo. Dopamine compared with any control treatment was not significantly associated with relative risk of mortality (60/457 [13%] vs 90/581 [15%]; RR 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.68‐1.21) or any other patient‐centred outcomes. Trial Sequential Analyses of all outcomes showed that there was insufficient information to confirm or reject our anticipated intervention effects. There were also no statistically significant associations for any of the outcomes in subgroup analyses by type of comparator (inactive compared to potentially active), dopamine dose (low compared to moderate dose), or setting (cardiac surgery compared to heart failure).

Conclusion

Evidence for dopamine in critically ill patients with cardiac dysfunction is sparse, of low quality, and inconclusive. The use of dopamine for cardiac dysfunction can neither be recommended nor refuted.

Treatment of Patients with Cardiac Surgery Associated-Acute Kidney Injury

Members of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) participated in a 3-day conference in Vicenza in May 2007 to evaluate the available literature on this topic and draft consensus recommendations for research studies in this area. This report summarizes the available evidence and describes the key questions that will need to be addressed with the goal of standardizing the care of patients with cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) and improving outcomes.

Renal Insufficiency After Cardiac Surgery

The new millennium ushered in a number of changes in cardiac surgery. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery became technically easier so that multivessel surgery became less of a challenge and cardiologists were supplied with new catheters that accessed lesions that were previously thought of as being unapproachable. New drugs were introduced that made the management of heart failure patients feasible on an outpatient basis, and new devices extend the bridging period to transplantation. However, these advances have not necessarily been attended by significant improvements in outcome, possibly because the less challengng a procedure becomes, the sicker the patients that can be managed. This observation is particularly true with the incidence and outcome of renal failure after cardiac surgery. Bypass factors have been manipulated without much effect, and the traditional drugs that were found to increase renal blood flow in animal experiments did not translate into clinical improvement in renal outcome. Recent research has given us insight into the pathophysiology of ischemic acute renal failure, and it has been found that the paradigm was not as simple as previously thought, possibly accounting for the failure of the more traditional renal drugs (dopamine, mannitol and diuretics). However, these new insights open up the possibility of novel targets for renal protection and repair.

Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

Various methods have been used to try to protect kidney function in patients undergoing surgery. These most often include pharmacological interventions such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), sodium bicarbonate, antioxidants and erythropoietin (EPO).

OBJECTIVES

This review is aimed at determining the effectiveness of various measures advocated to protect patients' kidneys during the perioperative period.We considered the following questions: (1) Are any specific measures known to protect kidney function during the perioperative period? (2) Of measures used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period, does any one method appear to be more effective than the others? (3) Of measures used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period,does any one method appear to be safer than the others?

SEARCH METHODS

In this updated review, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) (1966 to August 2012) and EMBASE (Ovid SP) (1988 to August 2012). We originally handsearched six journals (Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and Journal of Vascular Surgery) (1985 to 2004). However, because these journals are properly indexed in MEDLINE, we decided to rely on electronic searches only without handsearching the journals from 2004 onwards.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected all randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing surgery for which a treatment measure was used for the purpose of providing renal protection during the perioperative period.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We selected 72 studies for inclusion in this review. Two review authors extracted data from all selected studies and entered them into RevMan 5.1; then the data were appropriately analysed. We performed subgroup analyses for type of intervention, type of surgical procedure and pre-existing renal dysfunction. We undertook sensitivity analyses for studies with high and moderately good methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

The updated review included data from 72 studies, comprising a total of 4378 participants. Of these, 2291 received some form of treatment and 2087 acted as controls. The interventions consisted most often of different pharmaceutical agents, such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, NAC, ANP, sodium bicarbonate, antioxidants and EPO or selected hydration fluids. Some clinical heterogeneity and varying risk of bias were noted amongst the studies, although we were able to meaningfully interpret the data. Results showed significant heterogeneity and indicated that most interventions provided no benefit.Data on perioperative mortality were reported in 41 studies and data on acute renal injury in 44 studies (all interventions combined). Because of considerable clinical heterogeneity (different clinical scenarios, as well as considerable methodological variability amongst the studies), we did not perform a meta-analysis on the combined data.Subgroup analysis of major interventions and surgical procedures showed no significant influence of interventions on reported mortality and acute renal injury. For the subgroup of participants who had pre-existing renal damage, the risk of mortality from 10 trials (959 participants) was estimated as odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.52; the risk of acute renal injury (as reported in the trials) was estimated from 11 trials (979 participants) as OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.80. Subgroup analysis of studies that were rated as having low risk of bias revealed that 19 studies reported mortality numbers (1604 participants); OR was 1.01, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.90. Fifteen studies reported data on acute renal injury (criteria chosen by the individual studies; 1600 participants); OR was 1.03, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.97.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No reliable evidence from the available literature suggests that interventions during surgery can protect the kidneys from damage. However, the criteria used to diagnose acute renal damage varied in many of the older studies selected for inclusion in this review, many of which suffered from poor methodological quality such as insufficient participant numbers and poor definitions of end points such as acute renal failure and acute renal injury. Recent methods of detecting renal damage such as the use of specific biomarkers and better defined criteria for identifying renal damage (RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function and end-stage renal failure) or AKI (acute kidney injury)) may have to be explored further to determine any possible benefit derived from interventions used to protect the kidneys during the perioperative period.

Pharmacological therapies for the prevention of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Post-cardiac surgery acute kidney injury (AKI) is common and is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. We aimed to systematically review randomised trials that assessed the renoprotective utility of pharmacological agents in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomised controlled trials comparing renoprotective pharmacological interventions with control in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. We extracted data for mortality, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), incidence of AKI, and creatinine clearance at 24-48 h. About 49 randomised controlled trials involving 4605 patients were included. Pharmacological interventions included dopamine, fenoldopam, calcium channel antagonists, natriuretic peptides, diuretics, and N-acetylcysteine. Most trials were of poor quality, with small sample sizes, under-reporting of randomisation procedure, allocation concealment and method of blinding. No pharmacological intervention significantly reduced mortality. Fenoldopam and Atrial Natriuretic Peptide (ANP) reduced the need for renal replacement therapy by 5% (NNT 20, 95% CI 11.3, 83.0) and 3.5% (NNT 29, 95% CI 17.1, 84.4), respectively. Brain Natriuretic Peptide resulted in a 10% reduction in the incidence of AKI (NNT 11, 95% CI 6.2, 32.0). Dopamine caused a significant reduction in creatinine clearance (-4.26 ml/min, 95% CI -7.14, -1.39). The quality of studies that have assessed pharmacological renoprotective agents in cardiac surgery is generally poor. Fenoldopam, ANP and BNP show evidence of renoprotection. Randomised studies evaluating the effect of novel renoprotective agents that are powered to detect clinically relevant differences in outcomes are required.

Prevention and treatment of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and is associated with a high rate of death, long-term sequelae and healthcare costs. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials for strategies to prevent or treat AKI in cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We screened Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Renal Library, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trails in cardiac surgery for prevention or treatment of AKI in adults.

RESULTS

We identified 70 studies that contained a total of 5,554 participants published until November 2008. Most studies were small in sample size, were single-center, focused on preventive strategies, and displayed wide variation in AKI definitions. Only 26% were assessed to be of high quality according to the Jadad criteria. The types of strategies with possible protective efficacy were dopaminergic agents, vasodilators, anti-inflammatory agents, and pump/perfusion strategies. When analyzed separately, dopamine and N-acetylcysteine did not reduce the risk for AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

This summary of all the literature on prevention and treatment strategies for AKI in cardiac surgery highlights the need for better information. The results advocate large, good-quality, multicenter studies to determine whether promising interventions reliably reduce rates of acute renal replacement therapy and mortality in the cardiac surgery setting.

Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

A number of methods have been used to try to protect kidney function in patients undergoing surgery. These include the administration of dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and hydration fluids.

OBJECTIVES

For this review, we selected randomized controlled trials which employed different methods to protect renal function during the perioperative period. In examining these trials, we looked at outcomes that included renal failure and mortality as well as changes in renal function tests, such as urine output, creatinine clearance, free water clearance, fractional excretion of sodium and renal plasma flow.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1966 to June, 2007), and EMBASE (1988 to June, 2007); and handsearched six journals (Anesthesia and Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and Journal of Vascular Surgery).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected all randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing surgery where a treatment measure was used for the purpose of renal protection in the perioperative period.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We selected 53 studies for inclusion in this review. As well as data analysis from all the studies, we performed subgroup analysis for type of intervention, type of surgical procedure, and pre-existing renal dysfunction. We undertook sensitivity analysis on studies with high and moderately good methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included data from 53 studies, comprising a total of 2327 participants. Of these, 1293 received some form of treatment and 1034 acted as controls. The interventions mostly consisted of different pharmaceutical agents, such as dopamine and its analogues, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, or selected hydration fluids. The results indicated that certain interventions showed minimal benefits. All the results suffered from significant heterogeneity. Hence we cannot draw conclusions about the effectiveness of these interventions in protecting patients' kidneys during surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no reliable evidence from the available literature to suggest that interventions during surgery can protect the kidneys from damage. There is a need for more studies with high methodological quality. One particular area for further study may be patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction undergoing surgery.

Renal function after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in patients with impaired renal function. A randomized study of the effect of nifedipine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative acute renal failure predicts morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effect of nifedipine infusion on glomerular filtration rate in patients with impaired renal function undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

METHODS

Twenty patients accepted for coronary bypass and/or heart valve surgery were enrolled prospectively and randomized to nifedipine infusion or no treatment. Males and females with creatinine 150 micromol L(-1) and 130 micromol L(-1), respectively, were included. Patients with unstable angina pectoris, ejection fraction 35% and those on dialysis were excluded. Glomerular filtration rate was measured preoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. Creatinine clearance was measured preoperatively and 0-4, 20-24 and 44-48 h postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics. Biochemical markers in plasma and urine were measured before and 48 h after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean +/- SD preoperative glomerular filtration rates were 32.2 +/- 11.5 and 31.4 +/- 17.0 mL min-1 per 1.73 m2 in the nifedipine and control groups (P = 0.90), respectively. There was no statistically significant change in the glomerular filtration rate or in creatinine clearance over time within or between groups. A linear mixed model showed no effect of nifedipine (P = 0.44), time (P = 0.97) or interaction of nifedipine and time (P = 0.99) on creatinine clearance. Perioperative arterial pressure was kept within predefined targets. Three patients received dialysis postoperatively, all in the control group (P = 0.21). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in changes of urinary or plasma biochemistry.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal function was well preserved after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in patients with impaired renal function when maintaining thorough intensive care surveillance. Nifedipine did not influence early postoperative renal function.

Renal function and dysfunction

Recent publications regarding perioperative renal dysfunction provide a 'potpourri' of topics worthy of discussion. The risk of perioperative renal dysfunction is higher in patients with heart failure, but other pre-existing conditions, such as genetic polymorphism, may have prognostic implications. Evaluation of renal risk and protective interventions are discussed for a number of specific operative entities, including cardiac surgery (with or without cardiopulmonary bypass), aortic surgery and renal revascularization. New publications on a wide variety of nephrotoxic insults are presented, including antifibrinolytic agents, obstructive jaundice, prostaglandin inhibitors, cyclosporine A, radiocontrast dyes and volatile anesthetic agents. Renal transplantation is discussed as a specific entity. Finally, we discuss recent papers describing outcome in patients in chronic renal failure undergoing cardiac surgery.

'Low-dose' dopamine worsens renal perfusion in patients with acute renal failure

'Low-dose' dopamine is frequently used in intensive care units (ICU) for its presumed renoprotective effects, but prospective and retrospective studies have so far not proven prevention or amelioration of renal injury. Data on renal perfusion following dopamine infusion are limited. In order to circumvent the problem of patient heterogeneity in the ICU setting, we used a crossover design in a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled study to investigate the effect of 'low-dose' dopamine on renal resistance indices, as determined by Doppler ultrasound. Forty patients, 10 without and 30 with acute renal failure (ARF, defined as doubling of baseline creatinine or an increase above 2 mg/dl), were included. Dopamine (2 mug/kg min) or placebo was given intravenously in alternating sequence for four subsequent periods of 60 min, starting randomly with either dopamine or placebo. Resistive (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) were closely correlated, positively related to serum creatinine values at baseline and highly reproducible during the two paired infusion periods. Dopamine reduced renal vascular resistance in patients without ARF (median RI/PI from 0.70 to 0.65/1.20 to 1.07, P<0.01) but increased resistance indices in patients with ARF (median RI/PI from 0.77 to 0.81/1.64 to 1.79, P<0.01) in the absence of effects on systemic hemodynamics. Subgroup analysis of patients with ARF revealed that dopamine induced renal vasoconstriction above 55 years (n=22) and in patients not receiving norepinephrine (n=20). In conclusion 'low-dose' dopamine can worsen renal perfusion in patients with ARF, which adds to the rationale for abandoning the routine use of 'low-dose' dopamine in critically ill patients.

Interventions for protecting renal function in the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

A number of methods have been used to try to protect kidney function in patients undergoing surgery. These include the administration of dopamine, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and hydration fluids.

OBJECTIVES

For this review, we selected randomized controlled trials, which employed different methods to protect renal function during the perioperative period. In examining these trials, we looked at outcomes such as renal failure and mortality, as well as changes in the renal function tests, including urine output, creatinine clearance, free water clearance, fractional excretion of sodium and renal plasma flow.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to 2004) and EMBASE (1988 to 2004) and hand searched six journals (British Journal of Anaesthesia; Anesthesia and Analgesia; Anesthesiology; Annals of Surgery; Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Journal of Vascular Surgery).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected all randomized controlled trials in adult population undergoing surgery where a treatment measure was used for the purpose of renal protection in the perioperative period.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We selected 37 studies for inclusion in this review. As well as analysis of the data from all the studies, we also performed subgroup analysis for type of interventions, types of surgical procedures and those with pre-existing renal dysfunction. We undertook sensitivity analysis on studies with high methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included data from 37 studies, comprising a total of 1227 patients. Of these, 658 received some form of treatment and 569 acted as controls. The interventions were mostly employing different pharmaceutical agents such as dopamine, diuretics, calcium channel blockers. ACE inhibitors or selected hydration fluids. The results indicated that certain interventions showed some benefits, but all the results suffered from significant heterogeneity. Hence we can draw no conclusions about the effectiveness of these interventions in protecting the kidneys during surgery.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no reliable evidence from available literature to suggest that interventions during surgery can protect the kidneys from damage. However, there is a need for more studies of high methodological quality. One particular area for further studies may be on patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction undergoing surgery.

Vasoactive drugs and the kidney

Protection of renal function and prevention of acute renal failure (ARF) are important goals of resuscitation in critically ill patients. Beyond fluid resuscitation and avoidance of nephrotoxins, little is known about how such prevention can be achieved. Vasoactive drugs are often administered to improve either cardiac output or mean arterial pressure in the hope that renal blood flow will also be improved and, thereby, renal protection achieved. Some of these drugs (especially low-dose dopamine) have even been proposed to have a specific beneficial effect on renal blood flow. However, when all studies dealing with vasoactive drugs and their effects on the kidney are reviewed, it is clear that none have been demonstrated to achieve clinically important benefits in terms of renal protection. It is also clear that, with the exception of low-dose dopamine, there have been no randomized controlled trials of sufficient statistical power to detect differences in clinically meaningful outcomes. In the absence of such data, all that is available is based on limited physiological gains (changes in renal blood flow or urine output) with one or another drug in one or another subpopulation of patients. Furthermore, given our lack of understanding of the pathogenesis of ARF, it is unclear whether haemodynamic manipulation is an appropriate avenue to achieve renal protection. There is a great need for large randomized controlled trials to test the clinical, instead of physiological, effects of vasoactive drugs in critical illness.

Mannitol and dopamine in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized clinical trial

In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study, we determined the effects of two commonly used adjuncts, mannitol and dopamine, on beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)M) excretion rates in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). beta(2)M excretion rate has been described as a sensitive marker of proximal renal tubular function. One-hundred patients with a preoperative serum creatinine level <or=1.5 mg/dL were prospectively randomized into 4 groups: 1). placebo, 2). mannitol 1 g/kg added to the CPB prime, 3). dopamine 2 microg kg(-1x. min(-1) from the induction of anesthesia to 1 h post-CPB, or 4). mannitol plus dopamine. The primary outcome measure was beta(2)M excretion rate at 1 h post-CPB. Secondary outcome measures included beta(2)M excretion rate at 6 and 24 h post-CPB; urinary flow rate and creatinine clearance at 1, 6, and 24 h post-CPB; and the highest postoperative serum creatinine level. Length of intensive care stay and hospitalization, as well as adverse events, were also considered secondary outcomes. Dopamine significantly increased beta(2)M excretion rate at 1 h post-CPB (2.48 +/- 3.61 microg/min) compared with placebo (0.59 +/- 1.04 microg/min; P = 0.001). This effect was not ameliorated by the addition of mannitol (beta(2)M excretion rate, 2.05 +/- 2.77 microg/min; P = 0.007 compared with placebo). beta(2)M excretion rate was similar in patients given placebo or mannitol alone (P = 0.831). Rather than being a protective drug in the setting of CPB, dopamine alone or in combination with mannitol increases beta(2)M excretion rate, which may be a measure of renal tubular dysfunction. The clinical implications of this increase and whether it is also seen in patients with established renal dysfunction undergoing CPB require additional investigation.

IMPLICATIONS

In many clinical settings, an increased beta-2-microglobulin (beta(2)M) excretion rate indicates renal tubular injury. In this cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) study, a dopamine infusion (alone or with mannitol) resulted in an increased beta(2)M excretion rate. It is unclear whether this dopamine-related increase implies renal injury after CPB, and further investigations are required to examine the mechanism/clinical relevance of this observation.

Use of creatinine clearances to monitor the effect of low-dose dopamine in critically ill surgical patients

INTRODUCTION

Despite uncertain evidence of its efficacy, "low-dose dopamine" (2-5 microg/kg/min) has often been used to augment renal perfusion in critically ill surgical patients. The 2-h creatinine clearance (CC) has been shown to be a monitor of renal function in critically ill patients. We therefore studied the use of sequential CC determinations to monitor the effect of low-dose dopamine (LDD) in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients. We hypothesized that sequential CC measurements could demonstrate whether individual patients had positive responses in renal function to LDD.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected for patients on LDD in a university SICU. CC were recorded for these patients immediately before and after the institution of LDD or before and after the cessation of LDD. APACHE II scores, gender, urine creatinine, age, blood pressure, heart rate, and urine output (UO) were also recorded for these patients; P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty-four pairs of CC values were observed during the study. The mean APACHE II score for the patients was 15.1. In 10 cases after initiation of LDD, the mean CC increased from 52.5 +/- 23.7 ml/min to 68.1 +/- 33.8 ml/min (P = 0.056). UO also increased from 48.0 +/- 27 to 75.9 +/- 49 ml/h (NS). In 14 cases after discontinuation of LDD, CC decreased from 85.6 +/- 36.3 ml/min to 63.6 +/- 45.5 ml/min (P = 0.044) and UO decreased from 105.1 +/- 73.9 to 89.6 +/- 76.7 ml/h (NS). Overall, 13 of the 24 patients had a 25% change or more in CC upon initiation or cessation of LDD.

CONCLUSIONS

LDD institution increased CC in individual patients in the SICU population. Because using LDD in the absence of a discernable improvement in renal function is costly and may harbor risks, we recommend following CC in patients on LDD to determine which patients derive benefit from the intervention.

Influence of two different volume replacement regimens on renal function in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery: comparison of a new starch preparation with gelatin

OBJECTIVE

There is continuing concern on the influence of hydroxethyl starch (HES) on renal function.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

University-affiliated medical center.

PATIENTS

Forty consecutive patients aged >70 years undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTERVENTIONS

Either low-molecular HES (mean molecular weight: 130 kD) with low degree of substitution (0.4) (6% HES 130/0.4) (n=20) or gelatin ( n=20) was given after induction of anesthesia until the 2nd postoperative day (POD) to keep central venous pressure between 12-14 mmHg.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Creatinine clearance (CC) and fractional sodium clearance (FSC) were measured. N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamidase, alpha-1-microglobulin, glutathione transferase-pi, and glutathione transferase-alpha were measured from urine specimens. Measurements were made after induction of anesthesia, at the end of surgery, and at the first and the second POD. More gelatin (total: 4150+/-490 ml) than HES 130/0.4 (total: 3450+/-450 ml) was infused within the study. CC and FSC were without differences between the two groups. All measured kidney-specific proteins were almost within normal range at baseline. They increased significantly after surgery, however, without significant group differences. At the 2nd POD, kidney-specific proteins had returned almost to normal values. None of the patients developed acute renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitive markers of kidney dysfunction increased in our elderly patients indicating moderate alterations in kidney integrity during cardiac surgery. The two volume replacement regimens did not differ with regard to kidney integrity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

A case series of low-dose fenoldopam in seventy cardiac surgical patients at increased risk of renal dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of low-dose fenoldopam mesylate in patients at risk of developing renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.

DESIGN

A prospective, single-center, observational study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery with one or more predefined risk factors for renal dysfunction.

INTERVENTIONS

After induction of anesthesia, fenoldopam (0.03 microg/kg/min) was administered throughout surgery and into the postoperative period, until the patient was stable and weaned from all other vasoactive agents. Perioperatively, fenoldopam was also used as a second-line antihypertensive agent as required.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

No patient developed renal failure that required dialysis, whereas 7.1% (5/70) developed non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction. Four out of these 5 patients had 2 or more risk factors (9.5%). Higher preoperative creatinine levels, a history of hypertension, myocardial infarction within 5 days of surgery, and a preoperative diagnosis of chronic renal insufficiency were all good predictors of postoperative non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction. Discharge serum creatinine levels were lower than preoperative levels (1.16 +/- 0.36 mg/dL v 1.26 +/- 0.34 mg/dL, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that renal function was preserved in patients at increased risk for renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery when low-dose fenoldopam was used in the perioperative period. However, a randomized, controlled trial is required to establish efficacy.

Understanding renal dose dopamine

Low-dose dopamine is a widely administered drug used often in critical care settings to prevent or treat patients with low urinary output. There are new data to support that low-dose dopamine may have side effects and not always increase renal perfusion to the kidneys. This article is a review of the current use of low-dose dopamine, the role of dopamine in the kidneys, and the potential risks of infusing this drug to patients.

Use of dopamine in acute renal failure: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether low-dose dopamine administration reduces the incidence or severity of acute renal failure, need for dialysis, or mortality in patients with critical illness.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

We performed a MEDLINE search of literature published from 1966 to 2000 for studies addressing the use of dopamine in the prevention and/or treatment of renal dysfunction.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were abstracted regarding design characteristics, population, intervention, and outcomes. Results of individual randomized clinical trials were pooled using a fixed effects model and a Mantel-Haenszel weighted chi-square analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified a total of 58 studies (n = 2149). Of these, outcome data were reported in 24 studies (n = 1019) and 17 of these were randomized clinical trials (n = 854). Dopamine did not prevent mortality, (relative risk, 0.90 [0.44-1.83]; p =.92), onset of acute renal failure (relative risk, 0.81 [0.55-1.19]; p =.34), or need for dialysis, (relative risk, 0.83 [0.55-1.24]; p =.42). There was sufficient statistical power to exclude any large (>50%) effect of dopamine on the risk of acute renal failure or need for dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of low-dose dopamine for the treatment or prevention of acute renal failure cannot be justified on the basis of available evidence and should be eliminated from routine clinical use.

Oliguria in the ICU. Systematic approach to diagnosis and treatment

Perioperative oliguria is common but rarely implies acute renal failure. We should interpret oliguria as a sign of intravascular hypovolemia and treat it as prerenal until proven otherwise. On the other hand, the absence of oliguria does not exclude acute renal failure. The most reliable clinical indicator of progressive renal dysfunction is a serial decline in creatinine clearance estimation, a measure of glomerular filtration rate.

Low-dose "renal" dopamine

Low dose renal dopamine continues to be infused in patients at risk for renal dysfunction or as a therapy after acute renal failure has been established. This article reviews the impact of acute renal failure on patients and reviews the history and use of dopamine therapy for patients. A discussion of the rationale, positive and equivocal evidence, side effects, and possible clinical indications for low-dose renal dopamine therapy is included.

Renal blood flow regulation, autoregulation, and vasomotor nephropathy

Renal blood flow and renal perfusion pressure are regulated by two control mechanisms. The first, extrinsic, actually involves a complex interaction of vasomotor effects between opposing neurohormonal systems. The second, intrinsic mechanism, renal autoregulation, depends on changes in afferent arteriolar tone in response to the renal perfusion pressure itself. This article reviews these two mechanisms, how they normally respond to stress, and the clinical implications of certain situations in which these control mechanisms are disrupted.

The patient at risk for acute renal failure. Recognition, prevention, and preoperative optimization

Despite major advances in critical care medicine and extracorporeal renal support, the treatment of established postoperative ARF remains unsatisfactory and costly. The essential elements of perioperative renal preservation are early recognition of high-risk patients, preoperative optimization of fluid status and cardiovascular performance, intraoperative maintenance of renal perfusion, and avoidance of nephrotoxins. Pharmacologic interventions directed at preventing postoperative ARF are under intense investigation but presently are limited to renal transplant surgery.

Low-Dose Dopamine in Coronary Artery Bypass Patients with Preoperative Renal Dysfunction

Fifty-two patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery with preoperative renal dysfunction were studied to evaluate the effects of low-dose dopamine on renal function during the postoperative period. Patients were randomly assigned to the dopamine-treated group or an untreated control group. The treatment period was 24 hours commencing on induction of anesthesia. Serum creatinine levels were followed up for 6 days postoperatively. The degree of preoperative renal dysfunction was higher in the dopamine group but the pattern of change in the creatinine levels was similar in both groups, with an initial fall and a rise to maximum levels at 48 to 72 hours postoperatively, followed by a fall on day 6. We could not demonstrate any beneficial effect of low-dose dopamine in patients with preoperative renal dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

The use of diuretics and dopamine in acute renal failure: a systematic review of the evidence

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of diuretics and dopamine for both the prevention and treatment of renal dysfunction in the acute care setting. STUDY IDENTIFICATION AND SELECTION: Studies were identified via MEDLINE, and through bibliographies of primary and review articles. Articles were then screened by the author for studies addressing the use of diuretics or dopamine in the prevention and/or treatment of renal dysfunction. DATA ABSTRACTION AND LITERATURE APPRAISAL: From individual studies, data were abstracted regarding design features, population, intervention and outcomes. Studies were graded by levels according to their design. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies using diuretics and 30 involving dopamine were identified. Level I evidence exists against the use of diuretics for radiocontrast-induced acute tubular necrosis, and loop diuretics given after vascular surgery. There is level II evidence that diuretics do not improve outcome in patients with established acute renal failure. Level II evidence also exists against the use of dopamine in the prevention of acute tubular necrosis in multiple subsets of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of diuretics or dopamine for the prevention of acute renal failure cannot be justified on the basis of available evidence.

Is renal dose dopamine protective or therapeutic? No

This article argues that dopamine infused in low doses has not been shown to avert the onset of or ameliorate the course of acute renal failure in critically ill patients. The inotropic and diuretic effects of dopamine are discussed, and its adverse effects are described. An attempt is made to offer an evidence-based role for low-dose dopamine, namely as a diuretic in ventilated, euvolemic patients, resistant to conventional diuretic therapy.

Effects on renal function of a continuous infusion of nifedipine during cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects on renal function of continuously administered nifedipine during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

The study was prospective, randomized, and controlled.

SETTING

The study was performed in the Department of Anesthesia and intensive care unit of a regional hospital in Italy.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-four patients scheduled for elective coronary artery surgery; all patients had preoperative renal and hemodynamic function within normal limits.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: nifedipine and control. Twenty patients were included in the study: 10 patients in the nifedipine group (group A) and 10 patients in the control group (group B). In group A, nifedipine was continuously administered during CPB at an infusion rate ranging from 0.24 to 0.59 micrograms/kg/min to maintain the mean systemic arterial pressure (MAP) between 60 and 70 mmHg. In group B, increases of MAP above 70 mmHg were treated with IV boluses of urapidil (5 mg).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Renal function was studied using creatinine clearance (CRCL), determined before, during, and after the operation, and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured the day before and after the operation by plasma and urine clearance of 51-chromium edetic acid (51Cr-EDTA). Hemodynamic monitoring was performed using a pulmonary artery catheter. In comparison with preoperative determinations, CRCL and GFR values increased significantly after CPB (p < 0.001) and after the operation (p < 0.01) in the patients treated with nifedipine, whereas the two parameters showed a small and not significant reduction at the same times in the control patients. Hemodynamic function was well maintained in all patients throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that, besides the maintenance of adequate hemodynamics, a continuous infusion of nifedipine during CPB can be an additional therapeutic tool to protect renal function in cardiac surgical patients.

Effect of low-dose dopamine on sigmoid colonic intramucosal pH in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

The effect of low-dose dopamine administration on intramucosal pH (pHi) of the sigmoid colon and on postoperative function of various organs in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was examined. Nineteen patients were randomized to two groups; nine received dopamine at a rate of 3 micrograms per kg per min for 24 h from induction of anaesthesia and ten control patients received fluids without dopamine. pHi was measured with a silicone tonometer and daily samples of blood were taken for measurement of liver transaminase activity, arterial oxygen saturation and creatinine concentration. Mean(s.e.m.) pHi fell to a significantly lower minimum value in those receiving dopamine compared with control patients (6.86(0.10) versus 7.11(0.08), P < 0.05). Five of the nine patients given dopamine developed intramucosal acidosis compared with only one of the ten control patients (P = 0.06). After operation the mean(s.e.m.) aspartate transaminase concentration in patients given dopamine rose from 33(2) to 80(17) units/l (P < 0.01); in control patients it rose from 32(3) to 59(16) units/l (P = 0.054). No differences between the groups was observed in the postoperative ratio of arterial oxygen saturation to inspired oxygen fraction or creatinine concentrations. These results indicate that dopamine has no beneficial effect on bowel mucosal oxygenation and function of the various organs in patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair.

Increasing organ blood flow during cardiopulmonary bypass in pigs: comparison of dopamine and perfusion pressure

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether low-dose dopamine infusion (5 micrograms/kg/min) during cardiopulmonary bypass selectively increases perfusion to the kidney, splanchnic organs, and brain at low (45 mm Hg) as well as high (90 mm Hg) perfusion pressures.

DESIGN

Randomized crossover trial.

SETTING

Animal research laboratory in a university medical center.

SUBJECTS

Ten female Yorkshire pigs (weight 29.9 +/- 1.2 kg).

INTERVENTION

Anesthetized pigs were placed on normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass at a 100-mL/kg/min flow rate. After baseline measurements, the animal was subjected, in random sequence, to 15-min periods of low perfusion pressure (45 mm Hg), low perfusion pressure with dopamine (5 micrograms/kg/min), high perfusion pressure (90 mm Hg), and high perfusion pressure with dopamine. Regional perfusion (radioactive microspheres) was measured in tissue samples (2 to 10 g) from the renal cortex (outer two-third and inner one-third segments), stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, pancreas, and cerebral hemispheres.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Systemic perfusion pressure was altered by adjusting pump flow rate (r2 = .61; p < .05). In the kidney, cortical perfusion pressure increased from 178 +/- 16 mL/min/100 g at the low perfusion pressure to 399 +/- 23 mL/min/100 g at the high perfusion pressure (p < .05). Perfusion pressure augmentation increased the ratio of outer/inner renal cortical blood flow from 0.9 +/- 0.1 to 1.2 +/- 0.1 (p < .05). At each perfusion pressure, low-dose dopamine had no beneficial effect on renal perfusion or flow distribution. Similar results were found in the splanchnic organs, where regional perfusion was altered by perfusion pressure but not by dopamine. In contrast, neither changing perfusion pressure nor adding low-dose dopamine altered blood flow to the cerebral cortex.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that the lower autoregulatory limits of perfusion to the kidneys and splanchnic organs differ from those limits to the brain during normothermic bypass. Selective vasodilation from low-dose dopamine was not found in renal, splanchnic, or cerebral vascular beds. Increasing the perfusion pressure by pump flow, rather than by the addition of low-dose dopamine, enhanced renal and splanchnic but not cerebral blood flows during cardiopulmonary bypass.