A new adenosine subtype-1 receptor antagonist, FK-838, attenuates salt-induced hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats

Angiotensin II stimulation alters vasomotor response to adenosine in mouse mesenteric artery: role for A1 and A2B adenosine receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stimulation of the A1 adenosine receptor and angiotensin II receptor type-1 (AT1 receptor) causes vasoconstriction through activation of cytochrome P450 4A (CYP4A) and ERK1/2. Thus, we hypothesized that acute angiotensin II activation alters the vasomotor response induced by the non-selective adenosine receptor agonist, NECA, in mouse mesenteric arteries (MAs).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We used a Danish Myo Technology wire myograph to measure muscle tension in isolated MAs from wild type (WT), A1 receptor and A2B receptor knockout (KO) mice. Western blots were performed to determine the expression of AT1 receptors and CYP4A.

KEY RESULTS

Acute exposure (15 min) to angiotensin II attenuated the NECA-dependent vasodilatation and enhanced vasoconstriction. This vasoconstrictor effect of angiotensin II in NECA-treated MAs was abolished in A1 receptor KO mice and in WT mice treated with the A1 receptor antagonist DPCPX, CYP4A inhibitor HET0016 and ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059. In MAs from A2B receptor KO mice, the vasoconstrictor effect of angiotensin II on the NECA-induced response was shown to be dependent on A1 receptors. Furthermore, in A2B receptor KO mice, the expression of AT1 receptors and CYP4A was increased and the angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction enhanced. In addition, inhibition of KATP channels with glibenclamide significantly reduced NECA-induced vasodilatation in WT mice.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Acute angiotensin II stimulation enhanced A1 receptor-dependent vasoconstriction and inhibited A2B receptor-dependent vasodilatation, leading to a net vasoconstriction and altered vasomotor response to NECA in MAs. This interaction may be important in the regulation of BP.

Purinergic signaling and blood vessels in health and disease

Purinergic signaling plays important roles in control of vascular tone and remodeling. There is dual control of vascular tone by ATP released as a cotransmitter with noradrenaline from perivascular sympathetic nerves to cause vasoconstriction via P2X1 receptors, whereas ATP released from endothelial cells in response to changes in blood flow (producing shear stress) or hypoxia acts on P2X and P2Y receptors on endothelial cells to produce nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, which dilates vessels. ATP is also released from sensory-motor nerves during antidromic reflex activity to produce relaxation of some blood vessels. In this review, we stress the differences in neural and endothelial factors in purinergic control of different blood vessels. The long-term (trophic) actions of purine and pyrimidine nucleosides and nucleotides in promoting migration and proliferation of both vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells via P1 and P2Y receptors during angiogenesis and vessel remodeling during restenosis after angioplasty are described. The pathophysiology of blood vessels and therapeutic potential of purinergic agents in diseases, including hypertension, atherosclerosis, ischemia, thrombosis and stroke, diabetes, and migraine, is discussed.

Adenosine A1-receptor deficiency diminishes afferent arteriolar and blood pressure responses during nitric oxide inhibition and angiotensin II treatment

Adenosine mediates tubuloglomerular feedback responses via activation of A1-receptors on the renal afferent arteriole. Increased preglomerular reactivity, due to reduced nitric oxide (NO) production or increased levels of ANG II and reactive oxygen species (ROS), has been linked to hypertension. Using A1-receptor knockout (A1−/−) and wild-type (A1+/+) mice we investigated the hypothesis that A1-receptors modulate arteriolar and blood pressure responses during NO synthase (NOS) inhibition or ANG II treatment. Blood pressure and renal afferent arteriolar responses were measured in nontreated mice and in mice with prolonged Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (l-NAME) or ANG II treatment. The hypertensive responses to l-NAME and ANG II were clearly attenuated in A1−/− mice. Arteriolar contractions to l-NAME (10−4 mol/l; 15 min) and cumulative ANG II application (10−12 to 10−6 mol/l) were lower in A1−/− mice. Simultaneous treatment with tempol (10−4 mol/l; 15 min) attenuated arteriolar responses in A1+/+ but not in A1−/− mice, suggesting differences in ROS formation. Chronic treatment with l-NAME or ANG II did not alter arteriolar responses in A1−/− mice, but enhanced maximal contractions in A1+/+ mice. In addition, chronic treatments were associated with higher plasma levels of dimethylarginines (asymmetrical and symmetrical) and oxidative stress marker malondialdehyde in A1+/+ mice, and gene expression analysis showed reduced upregulation of NOS-isoforms and greater upregulation of NADPH oxidases. In conclusion, adenosine A1-receptors enhance preglomerular responses during NO inhibition and ANG II treatment. Interruption of A1-receptor signaling blunts l-NAME and ANG II-induced hypertension and oxidative stress and is linked to reduced responsiveness of afferent arterioles.

Tricyclic imidazoline derivatives as potent and selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonists

Novel tricyclic imidazoline antagonists of the adenosine A1 receptor are described. For key compounds, the selectivity level over other adenosine receptor subtypes is examined along with their in vivo effects in a rat diuresis model. Compound 14, the (R)-isomer of 7,8-dihydro-8-ethyl-2-(4-bicyclo[2.2.2]octan-1-ol)-4-propyl-1H-imidazo[2,1-i]purin-5(4H)-one, is a particularly potent adenosine A1 receptor antagonist with good selectivity over the other three adenosine receptor subtypes: A1 (human) Ki=22 nM; A2A (human) Ki=4400 nM; A2B (human) Ki=580 nM; A3 (human) Ki>or=10,000 nM. Imidazoline 14 is a competitive adenosine A1 receptor antagonist with a pA2 value of 8.88 and is highly soluble in water (>100 mg/mL). In addition, it has an oral bioavailability of 84% and an oral half-life of 3.8 h in rats. When orally administered in a rat diuresis model, compound 14 promoted sodium excretion (ED50=0.01 mg/kg). This level of efficacy is comparable to that of BG9928, a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist that is currently in clinical trials as a treatment for congestive heart failure. Additional modifications to 14 also showed that the bridgehead hydroxyl group could be replaced with a propionic acid (compound 36) without a significant loss in binding affinity or in vivo activity.

Adenosine A1 Receptor Antagonist Blunts Urinary Potassium Excretion, but Not Renal Hemodynamic Effects, Induced by Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor in Rats

Acetazolamide (AZ) is a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor with diuretic actions at the proximal tubule. Clinical use of AZ is limited, in part, because of the urinary potassium loss and decrease of renal hemodynamic function that accompanies the drug. There is recent interest in A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR) antagonists, a novel class of diuretic agents that do not cause loss of potassium or tubuloglomerular feedback- (TGF) mediated reductions of renal hemodynamics. We tested whether the A1AR antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) could attenuate the adverse effects normally associated with use of AZ. Renal blood flow (RBF) and urine output were measured during two consecutive 40-min periods in anesthetized rats. In the first period, vehicle or DPCPX was infused. DPCPX alone increased urine output and sodium excretion but did not significantly alter potassium output or RBF. In the second period, the initial infusion of vehicle or DPCPX was continued, and either AZ or its vehicle was administered. AZ alone increased urinary excretion of both sodium and potassium and decreased RBF. DPCPX significantly attenuated the AZ-induced increase of potassium excretion by 50% but did not blunt the renal hemodynamic response to AZ. In a separate study, angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockade also failed to blunt the renal hemodynamic response to AZ. In summary, A1AR antagonists may be useful diuretic agents alone or in combination with other conventional diuretic agents. The decrease of RBF that occurred in response to carbonic anhydrase inhibition was not attenuated by either A1AR blockade or AT1 receptor blockade and does not seem to be mediated by a TGF-dependent mechanism.

Activation of adenosine A1-receptor pathway induces edema formation in the pancreas of rats

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Adenosine has been shown to modulate various pathophysiologic conditions through receptor-mediated mechanisms. However, the role of adenosine in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis has not been described. We examined the effect of adenosine-receptor stimulation or inhibition on the pathologic changes of the pancreas.

METHODS

Rats received intraperitoneal injections of selective agonists of A1, A2a, and A3 adenosine receptors: 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), CGS-21680 (CGS), or 1-deoxy-1-[6-[[(3-iodophenyl)methyl]amino]-9H-purin-9-yl]-N-methyl-be ta-D-ribofuranuronamide (IB-MECA), respectively. Serum amylase activity and pathologic changes of the pancreas were evaluated. The effects of a specific A1-receptor antagonist (FK-838) on the pathologic findings of cerulein- and taurocholate-induced pancreatitis were also examined.

RESULTS

Administration of a selective A1 agonist induced hyperamylasemia and morphologic changes in the pancreas characterized by interstitial edema and leukocyte infiltration; neither A2a nor A3 agonist produced such changes. Treatment with an A1-receptor antagonist significantly attenuated the outcome induced by A1 agonist stimulation. In addition, the A1-receptor antagonist significantly ameliorated pancreatic edema in both pancreatitis models, although it did not improve the acinar cell damage of the pancreas or the increase of serum amylase.

CONCLUSIONS

Activation of the adenosine A1-receptor pathway may have an important role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis.

Genetic control of renal thiazide receptor response to dietary NaCl and hypertension

Excess NaCl increases blood pressure in some strains of animals but not others. An 8% NaCl diet did not change renal thiazide receptor (TZR) density in two salt-resistant normotensive rat strains (Wistar-Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley) [Fanestil, D. D., D. A. Vaughn, and P. Blakely. Am. J. Physiol. 273 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 42): R1241-R1245, 1997]. However, the renal response to salt differs in normal and hypertensive kidneys [Rettig, R., N. Bandelow, O. Patschan, B. Kuttler, B. Frey, and A. Uber. J. Hum. Hypertens. 10: 641-644, 1996]. Therefore, we examined two strains with salt-aggravated hypertension. Renal TZR did not change when Dahl-S (salt sensitive) animals became hypertensive with 8% dietary NaCl. In contrast, renal TZR decreased 34%, whereas blood pressure increased further, in SHR with 8% dietary NaCl. Blood pressure increased after NG-nitro-L-arginine in SHR, but renal TZR did not change, indicating the salt-induced decrease in TZR in SHR cannot be attributed nonspecifically to elevated arterial pressure. We conclude that the renal response to NaCl-induced increases in blood pressure can be genetically modulated independently of the genes that mediate either the primary hypertension or the salt sensitivity of the hypertension. This finding may be of use in future studies directed at identifying genotypes associated with salt-dependent hypertension.