Coupling of inhibitory receptors with Gi-proteins in hamster adipocytes: comparison between adenosine A1 receptor and alpha 2-adrenoceptor

Eliminating the antilipolytic adenosine A1 receptor does not lead to compensatory changes in the antilipolytic actions of PGE2 and nicotinic acid

AIM

We examined whether compensatory changes after adenosine A(1) receptor knockout [A(1)R (-/-)] eliminate the antilipolytic actions mediated by this receptor.

METHODS

Lipolysis experiments were performed on adipocytes prepared from the wild type A(1)R (+/+), A(1)R (-/-) and heterozygous mice. Gene expression was assayed with cDNA microarray technique and real-time PCR; protein expression with immunoblotting.

RESULTS

The A(1)R was the only adenosine receptor involved in lipolysis. The effects of adenosine deaminase and 2-chloroadenosine were abolished in A(1)R (-/-) mice. The IC(50) value of 2-chloroadenosine doubled from 16.6 to 33.6 nm when half of the A(1)Rs were eliminated. Adrenergic alpha(2) agonists had no effects on lipolysis. Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) inhibited lipolysis with an IC(50) value of 5.8 nm (4.7-7.2 nm) in the A(1)R (+/+) mice and 10.6 nm (9.0-12.6 nm) in the A(1)R (-/-) mice. Nicotinic acid inhibited lipolysis with an IC(50) value of 0.30 microm (0.19-0.46 microm) in the A(1)R (+/+) mice and 0.24 microm (0.16-0.37 microm) in the A(1)R (-/-) mice. G(i)alpha(1) mRNA was significantly up-regulated in adipose tissue from A(1)R (-/-) mice. However, immunoblotting showed that G(ialpha1) was not up-regulated at the protein level.

CONCLUSION

The A(1)R mediates the antilipolytic actions of adenosine. Deletion of the A(1)R in mice does not result in compensatory increases in G-protein-mediated antilipolytic actions of PGE(2) or nicotinic acid.

Mechanism of intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) inhibition of lipolysis in human adipocytes

We investigated the mechanisms responsible for the anti-lipolytic effect of intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) in human adipocytes. Increasing [Ca2+]i inhibited lipolysis induced by b-adrenergic receptor activation, A1 adenosine receptor inhibition, adenylate cyclase activation, and phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibition, as well as by a hydrolyzable cAMP analog, but not by a nonhydrolyzable cAMP analog. This finding indicates that the anti-lipolytic effect of [Ca2+]i may be mediated by the activation of adipocyte PDE. Consistent with this theory, [Ca2+]i inhibition of isoproterenol-stimulated lipolysis was reversed completely by the nonselective PDE inhibitor isobutyl methylxanthine and also by the selective PDE 3B inhibitor cilostamide, but not by selective PDE 1 and 4 inhibitors. In addition, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase inhibition with wortmannin completely prevented insulin's anti-lipolytic effect but only minimally blocked [Ca2+]i's effect, which suggests that [Ca2+]i and insulin may activate PDE 3B via different mechanisms. In contrast, the antilipolytic effect of [Ca2+]i was not affected by inhibitors of calmodulin, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase, protein phosphatase 2B, and protein kinase C. Finally, [Ca2+]i inhibited significantly isoproterenol-stimulated increases in cAMP levels and hormone-sensitive lipase phosphorylation in human adipocytes. In conclusion, increasing [Ca2+]i exerts an antilipolytic effect mainly by activation of PDE, leading to a decrease in cAMP and HSL phosphorylation and, consequently, inhibition of lipolysis.