Salbutamol output from two jet nebulizers

Nebulizers

Nebulizers generate aerosols from liquid-based solutions and suspensions. Nebulizers are particularly well suited to delivering larger doses of medication than is practical with inhalers and are used with a broad range of liquid formulations. When the same drug is available in liquid or inhaler form, nebulizers are applicable for use with patients who will not or cannot reliably use a pressurized metered-dosed inhaler (pMDI) or dry powder inhaler (DPI) due to poor lung function, hand-breath coordination, cognitive abilities (e.g., infants, elderly) or device preference. In a nebulizer, liquid medication is placed in a reservoir and fed to an aerosol generator to produce the droplets. A series of tubes and channels direct the aerosol to the patient via an interface such as mouthpiece, mask, tent, nasal prongs or artificial airway. All nebulizers contain these basic parts, although the technology and design used can vary widely and can result in significant difference in ergonomics, directions for use, and performance. While many types of nebulizers have been described, the three categories of modern clinical nebulizers include: (1) pneumatic jet nebulizers (JN); (2) ultrasonic nebulizers (USN); and (3) vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN). Nebulizers are also described in terms of their reservoir size. Small volume nebulizers (SVNs), most commonly used for medical aerosol therapy, can hold 5 to 20 mL of medication and may be jet, ultrasonic, or mesh nebulizers. Large volume nebulizers, typically jet or ultrasonic nebulizers, hold up to 200 mL and may be used for either bland aerosol therapy or continuous drug administration.

Importance of drug delivery system in steroid aerosol therapy via nebulizer

Aim of our study was to evaluate if the type of nebulizer can influence the effects of steroid aerosol therapy. We considered 27 asthmatics allergic to grasses with FEV1<80% of the predictive value or methacholine PD20 FEV1<750 mcg. The patients were divided into three groups in relation to the type of nebulizer they used and treated 9 weeks by aerosol therapy with beclomethasone dipropionate bid (800 mcg). Respect to the values recorded at the beginning and at the end of the therapy we found different variations of spirometric indeces and PD20 values among the three groups. We can conclude that the type of nebulizer influences steroid aerosol therapy and, particularly, jet nebulizers seem more efficient than ultrasonic nebulizers.

Accounting for radioactivity before and after nebulization of tobramycin to insure accuracy of quantification of lung deposition

The ability to predict drug deposition of inhaled drugs used in cystic fibrosis (CF) is important if there is a need to target specific doses of drug to the lungs of individual patients. The gold standard of measuring pulmonary deposition is the quantification of an aerosolized radiolabel either mixed with the drug solution or tagged directly to the compound of interest. Accuracy of the quantification could be assured if there is agreement between the amount of radioactivity before and after administration. Before administration, the radiolabel is concentrated in the well of the nebulizer, whereas after administration, it is distributed throughout the nebulizer, the expiratory filter and connectors, and the upper airway, stomach, trachea, and lung. Not only is the geometry of the distribution that is presented to the gamma camera different, but there are different attenuation factors for the various body tissues. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the quantification of deposition. Secondary goals were to compare in vitro nebulizer performance with that measured in vivo during the deposition study. Eighty milligrams of tobramycin and technetium bound to human serum albumin was administered to 10 normal adults using a Pari LC Jet Plus (Pari Respiratory Equipment, Inc., Richmond, VA) breath-enhanced nebulizer. Techniques were developed that allowed for the accounting of 99 +/- 2% of the initial radioactivity. The fraction of the rate of lung deposition to total body deposition was the in vivo respirable fraction (0.62 +/- 0.07), which closely agreed with in vitro measurements of respirable fraction (0.62 +/- 0.04). Drug output measured from the change in weight and concentration in the nebulizer systematically overestimated drug output measured by the deposition study. The results indicate that 11.8 of the initial 80 mg would be deposited in the lungs. This technique could be adapted to accurately quantify the amount of deposition on any inhaled therapeutic agent, but caution must be used when extrapolating performance of a nebulizer on the bench to expected deposition in patients.

Characterization of aerosol output from various nebulizer/compressor combinations

OBJECTIVES

Different commercially available nebulizers and compressors are available. However, the optimal combination for drug delivery is unknown.

METHODS

Flow rates of five different compressors (n = 3/compressor) tested alone and in combination with five different commercial nebulizers (n = 9 of each brand of nebulizer) were evaluated. Thereafter, the performances of the different nebulizers were evaluated using 2.5 mg albuterol solution (0.5 mL) added to 2.5 mL saline at flow rates of 2, 3, 4, and 5 L/minute using a laser particle analyzer. Volume median diameter and percentage of particles in the respirable range (1-5 microm) were calculated from this data. Time for nebulization (in seconds) and residual volume (in milliliters) were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean flow rates for the compressors evaluated without a nebulizer attached ranged from 6.6 L/minute (LifeCare Freedom-neb; LifeCare International, Lafayette, CO) to 12.2 L/minute (DeVilbiss Pulmo-Aide; DeVilbiss Health Care, Somerset, PA). Flow rates for the nebulizer/compressor combinations ranged from 2.08 L/minute (Pari LC Jet Proneb; Pari Respiratory Equipment, Richmond, VA) to 5.42 L/minute (Puritan Bennett Raindrop; Puritan Bennett, Lenexa, KS/Omron Compare; Omron, Health Care,Vernon Hills, IL). Using the repeated measure ANOVA model, the interaction between flow rate and device was significant (P < 0.001) for both percentage of particles in the respirable range and log volume median diameter. It was observed that the percentage of particles in the respirable range for the Pari LC Jet did not increase across flow rates in contrast to the other 4 nebulizers. All comparisons to the Pari LC Jet at 2 L/minute were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Marked variability exists in the flow rates among different commercially available compressors used for home nebulization of inhaled pulmonary medications. Different nebulizer/compressor combinations have markedly different performance characteristics which could result in different efficacy and safety profiles of the medications being administered via these devices. We recommend that this type of information be used as a starting point for selecting different nebulizer/compressor combinations. Further clinical evaluation is warranted.

Nebulizer choice for inhaled colistin treatment in cystic fibrosis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To develop practical ways of nebulizing colistin by determining the rate of drug output, total drug output, and particle-size distribution of two commercially available jet nebulizers, the disposable Hudson 1730 Updraft II (Hudson Respiratory Care; Temecula, CA) and the reusable Pari LC Star breath-enhanced nebulizer (Pari Respiratory Equipment; Midlothian, VA).

METHODS

The nebulizers contained colistin, 75 mg, in 4 mL of isotonic solution. Particle-size distribution was measured by helium-neon laser diffraction, allowing calculation of the respirable fraction (RF), the mass of aerosol comprised of droplets < 5 microm.

RESULTS

The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) total rate of output of the Updraft II was 2.6 mg/min (2.0, 3.1; n = 4) with 1.3 mg/min (1.0, 1.5) mg/min within the RF. The rate of output of the LC Star increased in a quadratic relationship to the inspiratory flow, delivering 1.8 mg/min (0.7, 2.0; n = 4) with 1.4 mg/min (1.3, 1.6) within the RF, and 6.2 mg/min (5.6, 6.8) with 5.3 mg/min (4.8, 5.7) within the RF, at 0 L/min and 20 L/min inspiratory flows, respectively. Efficiency, as the rate of expected pulmonary deposition divided by rate of total output, was then calculated. The LC Star estimated 56% (51, 61) efficiency, with pulmonary delivery of 29% (26, 32) of the charge of the nebulizer, compared to the Updraft II at 22% (22, 23) efficiency and expected pulmonary deposition of 10% (10, 10) of the dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Colistin can be successfully nebulized with both nebulizers tested. This study provides an estimate of in vivo efficiency and expected pulmonary deposition that may be used in future trials.

Four hours of continuous albuterol nebulization

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Continuous albuterol nebulization (CAN) is a therapeutic modality available to treat status asthmaticus. Currently, CAN may be administered using a large-volume nebulizer (LVN) or a small-volume nebulizer attached to an infusion pump or refilled as needed. Few data are available regarding the reproducibility of aerosol characteristics during CAN. In this study, we determined the aerodynamic profile, drug output (DO), DO in respirable range (RD), solution output (SO), and changes in reservoir's albuterol concentration (AR) hourly during 4 hours of CAN.

DESIGN

A modified Puritan-Bennett 1600 jet nebulizer was tested with a large reservoir (LR; 250 mL), medium reservoir (MR; 45 mL), and small reservoir with infusion pump (SRP; 18 mL). We used 100-, 40-, and 4-mL initial fill volumes (with 10-mL/h infusion for SRP) of 1 mg/mL albuterol solution for the LR, MR, and SRP, respectively. Particle size distribution and DO consistency were determined by impaction and spectrophotometric analysis (275 nm). We also determined albuterol mass output. The SO was determined by gravimetric technique.

RESULTS

The PBsj produced a heterodisperse aerosol with a median mass aerodynamic diameter range of 1.8 to 2.2 microm. DO and RD paralleled SO. The LR had the highest SO, DO, and RD (8.03+/-2.36 vs 5.73+/-2.48 and 5.85+/-0.51 mg/h for MR and SRP, respectively). The AR showed no statistically significant changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBsj demonstrated consistent and adequate aerosol production during 4 hours of CAN. These bench data support the widespread use of a LVN for CAN.

Effects of repetitive use and cleaning techniques of disposable jet nebulizers on aerosol generation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Patients with cystic fibrosis use disposable jet nebulizers for the self-administration of antibiotics, DNase, and bronchodilators several times per day. Most patients elect to reuse their disposable nebulizers. The purpose of this study was to determine if significant changes in particle size distribution or output (mL/min) occurred with reuse.

DESIGN

In vitro studies were performed using four disposable models and one durable jet nebulizer for up to 100 runs; measurements of particle size and output were obtained at 10 run intervals, using saline solution alone, tobramycin, gentamicin, or a mixture of albuterol and cromolyn. Particle size determinations were made with a laser diffraction analyzer.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the baseline performance of the four disposable models and the durable Pari LC, when measuring particle size distribution of the aerosol; the Pari LC had an output rate two to three times higher than the four disposable models. For each of the four solutes tested, there was no clinically significant change in performance for up to 100 cycles, when the nebulizers were properly cleaned between uses. Unwashed units containing tobramycin started to fail by 40 runs.

CONCLUSIONS

When properly maintained, there was no trend of deterioration of performance with repeated use of disposable nebulizers. Microbial contamination was not addressed in this study and must be considered prior to recommendations for the reuse of disposable nebulizers.

A comparison of pulmonary availability between Ventolin (albuterol) nebules and Ventolin (albuterol) Respirator Solution

The two most common albuterol preparations used for nebulization are: (1) Ventolin (albuterol) respirator solution (Glaxo Canada Inc; Montreal, Canada) of which 2.5 mg (0.5 mL) is diluted with 2 mL of normal saline solution, and (2) the preservative-free, prediluted Ventolin (albuterol) Nebules PF (Glaxo) (2.5 mg/2.5 mL). The two preparations were compared using both a Hudson 1720 "T" up-draft Neb-U-Mist jet nebulizer and a Hudson 1730 "T" up-draft Neb-U-Mist II jet nebulizer (Hudson; Temecula, Calif), which were driven by a compressor (Pulmo-Aide; Devilbiss; Somerset, Pa) and by dry compressed air at 6 and 8 L/min. Particle size distribution was measured with a particle sizer (Malvern 2600; Malvern Instruments; Malvern, UK) and drug output for the nebulizer was calculated from the differences in predrug and postdrug volume and concentration. Drug availability was defined as the amount of drug carried in particles less than 5 microns in diameter. Drug availability was greater with the albuterol respiratory solution, due to the surface activity of the preservative benzalkonium chloride, for both nebulizers but particularly for the 1720. Differences in drug availability between nebulizers exceeded fourfold depending on the preparation, the nebulizer, and the nebulizing flow. These differences could not have been predicted from the manufacturer's specifications. The results suggest that prediction of drug availability must be based on measurements with the specific preparation and the specific nebulizer used.

A comparison of commercial jet nebulizers

Seventeen commercially available jet nebulizers from 15 commercial sources were studied (Acorn-I, Acorn-II, AquaTower, AVA-NEB, Cirrhus, Dart, DeVilbiss 646, Downdraft, Fan Jet, MB-5, Misty Neb, PARI LC JET, PARI-JET, Salter 8900, Sidestream, Updraft-II, Whisper Jet). All nebulizers were filled with 2 ml of saline solution plus 0.5 ml of albuterol and powered with the same source (DeVilbiss PulmoAide). We compared total output (TO), time for total output (TTO), and percent output in respirable range (PORR). The TO was obtained by weighing before nebulization and at the point of eight-fold decline in output. The TTO was calculated from initiation of nebulization to the point of eightfold decline in output. The PORR was measured by a laser particle analyzer in continuous nebulization to the same point of abrupt drop in output. The TO varied from 0.98 To 1.86 ml (p < 0.0001) with the Acorn-I, Acorn-II, Updraft-II, and Sidestream, significantly greater than the others (p < 0.05). The TTO varied from 2.28 to 20.95 min (p < 0.0001). The AquaTower, PARI LC JET and PARI-JET, DeVilbiss, and Dart were significantly shorter than the others (p < 0.05). The PORR varied from 21.89 to 71.95 percent (p < 0.0001). The Sidestream was significantly greater than all others (p < 0.05). The PARI LC JET and PARI-JET were, in turn, significantly greater than the remaining models (p < 0.05). To combine these characteristics, we calculated respirable particle delivery rate (RPDR) by dividing TO by TTO and multiplying by PORR. The RPDR varied from 0.03 ml/min to 0.26 ml/min (p < 0.0001). The PARI LC JET (0.24 ml/min) and the PARI-JET (0.26 mg/min) had a RPDR that was significantly greater than the other models except the AquaTower, which, however, had a markedly variable performance. The Sidestream (0.19 mg/ml) did not differ significantly from the above group, nor from the DeVilbiss and Downdraft. All other models had significantly lower outputs (p < 0.05). We conclude that the output characteristics of commercial nebulizers vary greatly and will impact on the time required for treatment as well as the total amount of drug delivered to the lungs.