Phase I study comparing continuous infusion of recombinant interleukin-2 by subcutaneous or intravenous administration

The development and evaluation of a subcutaneous infusion delivery system based on osmotic pump control and gas drive

A novel, self-administration drug delivery system for subcutaneous infusion was developed and evaluated. The device includes two main components: an osmotic tablet controlled gas actuator and a syringe catheter system. The sodium carbonate in the osmotic pump tablet will release into the surround citric acid solution and produce CO₂ gas, which will drive the drug solution into subcutaneous tissue. The key formulation factors of the osmotic tablet that would influence the infusion profiles of the device were investigated by single factor exploration. The formulation was optimized via a response surface methodology. With an 18 ± 4 min of lag time, the delivery system was able to infuse at an approximate zero-order up to 5.90 ± 0.37 h with a precision of 9.0% RSD (n = 6). A linear correlation was found for the infusion profile and the fitting equation was Y = 0.014X - 0.004 (r = 0.998). A temperature change of 4 °C was found to modify the flow rate by about 12.0%. In vivo results demonstrated that the present subcutaneous infusion device was similar to the commercial infusion pump, and it could bring a long and constant ampicillin plasma level with minimized fluctuations.

WITHDRAWN: Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer

This review is being updated and replaced following the publication of a new protocol (Unverzagt S, Moldenhauer I, Coppin C, Greco F, Seliger B. Immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma [Protocol]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD011673. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011673). It will remain withdrawn when the new review is published.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer

BACKGROUND

The course of advanced renal cell carcinoma is extremely variable, ranging from spontaneous remission to disease progression refractory to chemotherapy. Immunotherapy has held promise of improved outcomes based on uncontrolled studies and randomized controlled trials generally limited by small size and low power.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate immunotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma by comparing: (1) high dose interleukin-2 to other options and (2) interferon-alfa to other options. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival at one year, with remission as the main secondary outcome of interest.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A systematic search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was conducted for the period 1966 through end of December 2003. Handsearches were made of the proceedings of the periodic meetings of the American Urologic Association, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ECCO - the European Cancer Conference, and the European Society of Medical Oncology for the period 1995 to June 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that selected (or stratified) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, utilized an immunotherapeutic agent in at least one study arm, and reported remission or survival by allocation. Fifty-three identified studies involving 6117 patients were eligible and all but one reported remission; 32 of these studies reported the one-year survival outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted each article by following a prospectively designed protocol. Dichotomous outcomes for treatment remission (partial plus complete) and for deaths at one year were used for the main comparisons. Survival hazard ratios were also used for studies of interferon-alfa versus controls, and for two randomized studies of the value of initial nephrectomy prior to interferon-alfa in fit patients with metastases detected at the time of diagnosis.

MAIN RESULTS

Combined data for a variety of immunotherapies gave an overall chance of partial or complete remission of only 12.9% (99 study arms), compared to 2.5% in 10 non-immunotherapy control arms, and 4.3% in two placebo arms. Twenty-eight percent of these remissions were designated as complete (data from 45 studies). Median survival averaged 13.3 months (range by arm, 6 to 27+ months). The difference in remission rate between arms was poorly correlated with the difference in median survival so that remission rate is not a good surrogate or intermediate outcome for survival for advanced renal cancer. We were unable to identify any published randomized study of high-dose interleukin-2 versus a non-immunotherapy control, or of high-dose interleukin-2 versus interferon-alfa reporting survival. It has been established that reduced dose interleukin-2 given by intravenous bolus or by subcutaneous injection provides equivalent survival to high dose interleukin-2 with less toxicity. Results from four studies (644 patients) indicate that interferon-alfa is superior to controls (OR for death at one year = 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.77). Using the method of Parmar 1998, the pooled overall hazard ratio for death was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.88). The weighted average median improvement in survival was 3.8 months. T he optimal dose and duration of interferon-alfa remains to be elucidated. The addition of a variety of enhancers, including lower dose intravenous or subcutaneous interleukin-2, has failed to improve survival compared to interferon-alfa alone. Two recent randomized studies have examined the role of initial nephrectomy prior to interferon-alfa therapy in highly selected fit patients with metastases at diagnosis and minimal symptoms: despite minimal improvement in the chance of remission, both studies of up-front nephrectomy improved median survival by 4.8 months over interferon-alfa alone. Recent studies have been examining anti-angiogenesis agents. A landmark study of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, was associated with significant prolongation of the time to progression of disease when given at high dose compared to low-dose or placebo therapy though frequency of remissions or survival were not improved.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

interferon-alfa provides a modest survival benefit compared to other commonly used treatments and should be considered for the control arm of future studies of systemic agents. In fit patients with metastases at diagnosis and minimal symptoms, nephrectomy followed by interferon-alfa gives the best survival strategy for fully validated therapies. The need for more effective specific therapy for this condition is apparent.

Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous and continuous intravenous infusion rIL-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from four open-label, nonrandomised, phase II trials of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma to compare the safety and efficacy of administration by subcutaneous (s.c.) and continuous intravenous (c.i.v.) infusion (n=103 s.c. and n=225 c.i.v.). No statistically significant differences were found between the cohorts in terms of overall response rate (s.c.: 13.6% vs c.i.v.: 12.4%, P=0.77), response duration (s.c.: 9.8 months vs c.i.v.: 10.1 months, P=0.99), and overall survival (P=0.08). Compared with c.i.v. administration, more patients in the s.c. cohort experienced stable disease (50.5 vs 29.8%) and fewer underwent disease progression (35.0 vs 43.6%). Subcutaneous administration was associated with a significantly lower incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (46 vs 76%; P<0.001), and fewer s.c. patients required dose reductions because of toxicity (20 vs 82%). At the doses and within the schedules tested, this comparative analysis did not detect any difference in efficacy between s.c. and c.i.v. administration of rIL-2 in terms of overall survival, duration of response and response rate in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, s.c. delivery of rIL-2 was associated with improved tolerability.

Phase I trial of subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) has activity in metastatic melanoma when given in high doses by the intravenous (IV) route, but its side effects and effectiveness when given in intermediate to high doses by the subcutaneous (SC) route have not been studied adequately. This study sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IL-2 administered once daily by the SC route.

METHODS

Outpatients with progressive metastatic melanoma after chemotherapy were enrolled in a Phase I trial of IL-2 administered SC daily for 5 days per week for 4 consecutive weeks, repeated at 6-week intervals. Patients were instructed to drink at least 2 L of fluid daily. IL-2 pharmacokinetic studies were performed at the two highest dose levels. Toxicity was recorded weekly using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Response was assessed at 6-week intervals.

RESULTS

Three patients, 6 patients, 6 patients, and 4 patients received a median of 2 courses of SC IL-2 at dose levels of 6 MIU/m(2), 9 MIU/m(2), 12 MIU/m(2), and 15 MIU/m(2), respectively. Failure to maintain adequate fluid intake was responsible for 2 episodes of syncope at the 9 MIU/m(2) dose level and for 2 incidents of reversible prerenal azotemia at the 15 MIU/m(2) dose level. IL-2 treatment was resumed in these patients without incident. At the 15 MIU/m(2) dose level, 2 patients had severe headaches, depression, and visual hallucinations requiring discontinuation of treatment. Cough and fluid retention at the end of the third and fourth weeks at the 15 MIU/m(2) dose level approximated the symptoms reported by inpatients treated by continuous IV infusion at 9 MIU/m(2) on the same schedule. There was a partial response and a complete response in subcutaneous disease at the 12 MIU/m(2) and 15 MIU/m(2) dose levels, respectively, each lasting < 2 months. Plasma IL-2 levels after SC injection of 1000-5000 pg/mL reached maximum by 3 hours and were detectable for up to 48 hours after administration. The half-lives for SC IL-2 absorbance and clearance were 1.6 hours and 5.2 hours, respectively, and the calculated area under the curve was 30,584 pg/mL x hour.

CONCLUSIONS

SC IL-2 was well tolerated and had high sustained bioavailability at the higher doses studied. The MTD for a daily SC regimen was 12 MIU/m(2) and is recommended for future studies.

Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer

BACKGROUND

The course of advanced renal cell carcinoma is extremely variable, ranging from spontaneous remission to disease progression refractory to chemotherapy. Immunotherapy has held promise of improved outcomes based on uncontrolled studies and randomized controlled trials generally limited by small size and low power.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate immunotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma by comparing: (1) high dose interleukin-2 to other options and (2) interferon-alpha to other options.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search of MEDLINE, Cancerlit, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from 1966 through the end of 1999. Handsearches were made of the proceedings of the annual meetings of the American Urologic Association, ASCO, and biennial European ECCO meetings, and the references of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that selected (or stratified) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, utilized an immunotherapeutic agent in at least one study arm, and reported response or survival by allocation. Forty-two studies involving 4216 patients were eligible and reported response and 26 of these reported survival outcome (3089 patients).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers abstracted each article by following a prospectively designed protocol. Dichotomous outcomes for treatment response (partial plus complete) and for deaths at one year were used for the main comparisons. Survival hazard ratios were also used for studies of interferon-alpha versus controls.

MAIN RESULTS

The average response rate was 10.2 % (range by arm, 0 - 39%) and complete response rate was 3.2% (123/3852; n = 38 studies). Median survival averaged 11.6 months (range by arm, 6 - 28 months) and two-year survival averaged 22% (16 studies, range by arm 8 - 41%). There were no placebo-controlled studies and no randomized controlled studies examined survival for high dose interleukin-2 versus controls. Results from 6 studies (n = 963) indicate that interferon-alpha is superior to controls (OR for death at one year = 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 - 0.89. The pooled hazard ratio for survival of 0.78 (0.67 - 0.90) indicates that the treatment effect persisted until 24 months from randomization. The weighted average median improvement in survival was 2.6 months. Additional comparisons failed to prove a survival benefit from the addition of other agents to either modified schedules of interleukin-2 or to interferon-alpha. Dose-response studies examining survival for either agent could not be identified. The difference in response rate between arms was correlated with the difference in survival (P<0.001) suggesting that response rate difference may be a surrogate intermediate endpoint for survival.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha provides a modest survival benefit compared to other commonly used treatments and should be considered for the control arm of future studies of systemic agents. Interleukin-2 has not been validated in controlled randomized studies.

Interleukin 2 therapy: current role in surgical oncological practice

The use of recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL-2) in clinical practice has opened up new and beneficial avenues in the treatment of certain malignant diseases. Although rIL-2 can stimulate a range of host antitumour defence mechanisms, only 30-40 per cent of patients who are treated will respond to such therapy as assessed by a reduction in tumour volume. The effect of rIL-2-based treatment schedules on delaying progression of disease and on overall survival in comparison with standard current treatments and chemotherapeutic regimens is not clear. Randomized clinical trials are required to evaluate precisely the role of rIL-2 in various therapeutic combinations and to ascertain the optimum therapeutic regimens for individual tumour types. Studies currently under way should provide more insight into the possible beneficial effects of immunotherapy with rIL-2. More basic research is required to ascertain how rIL-2 may produce its antitumour effects and why the therapeutic results obtained in humans have been so selective and less beneficial than those in experimental animals.