Feasibility trial of a combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide, fluorouracil and folinic acid (VIF regimen) in advanced urothelial cancer

Vinorelbine rescue therapy for dogs with primary urinary bladder carcinoma

The goal of this study was to evaluate the anti-tumour activity and toxicoses of vinorelbine as a palliative rescue therapy for dogs with primary urinary bladder carcinoma. Thirteen dogs refractory to prior chemotherapeutics and one dog naïve to chemotherapeutic treatment were enrolled. Vinorelbine (15 mg m(-2) IV) was administered intravenously along with concurrent oral anti-inflammatory drugs, if tolerated. A median of six doses of vinorelbine (range: 1-16) was administered. Two dogs (14%) had partial responses, and eight (57%) experienced stable disease. Subjective improvement in clinical signs was noted in 11 dogs (78%). Adverse events were mild and primarily haematological in nature. Median time to progression was 93 days (range: 20-239 days). Median survival time for all dogs was 187 days; median survival for 13 pre-treated dogs was 207 days. Vinorelbine may have utility in the management of canine primary urinary bladder carcinoma and should be evaluated in a prospective study.

Gemcitabine Plus Vinorelbine Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Bladder Carcinoma Who Are Medically Unsuitable for or Who Have Failed Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine chemotherapy in patients with advanced bladder carcinoma who are unsuitable for or who have failed cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder were scheduled to receive gemcitabine and vinorelbine chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients had received no prior chemotherapy and their creatinine clearance was below 50 ml/min (group 1), and the remaining 10 patients did not respond to previous cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (group 2).

RESULTS

In group 1, objective response rate was 47.6%, including 2 (9.5%) complete and 8 (38.9%) partial responses. In group 2, partial response was observed in 2 (20%) patients. The median survival time for patients in group 1 and 2 were 15 months (range 3-23) and 7 months (range 3-21), respectively. Grades 3 or 4 leukopenia developed in 16.1% of patients. Overall, 12.9% of the patients suffered from grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data indicate that the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine is active and well tolerated especially in patients with advanced TCC who are unsuitable for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Weekly chemotherapy with docetaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced transitional cell urothelial cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of weekly docetaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five chemotherapy-naïve (adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed) patients with advanced TCC received intravenous docetaxel 35 mg/m2, gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given from days 3 to 6 and days 10 to 15, anti-emetics were used routinely.

RESULTS

Most (27) patients (77.1%) had a performance status of 0 to 1 and eight (22.9%) had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 65.6% [23/35 patients, 95% confidence interval (CI) 47.8% to 80.9%]. Ten patients (28.5%) achieved a complete response (95% CI 14.6% to 46.3%) and 13 (37.1%) a partial response (95% CI 21.5% to 55.0%). Median survival time was 15.5 months, median duration of response was 10.2 months and median time to progression was 8.9 months. Ten patients (28.5%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia, including five (14.3%) who experienced febrile neutropenia, which was successfully treated. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 20% and 25.7% of patients, respectively; four patients required platelet transfusions. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly docetaxel, gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a highly effective treatment for chemotherapy-naïve advanced TCC, and causes only moderate toxicity. This regimen should be considered as a suitable option that deserves further prospective evaluation through randomised phase III trials.

Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and ifosfamide as second-line treatment in metastatic urothelial cancer. A phase II trial conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and ifosfamide as a second-line treatment for advanced urothelial cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with metastatic urothelial cancer previously treated with cisplatin (CDDP)/ carboplatin (CBDCA) and/or taxanes-based chemotherapy were studied. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and ifosfamide at a dose of 2 g/m2 on days 1 and 8 with adequate amount of Mesna. every three weeks. Hematopoietic growth factors were given between days 3 to 5 and 12 to 16 to maintain the treatment schedule.

RESULTS

On an intent to treat basis, there was one complete response (CR) (3%) (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0% to 10%) and six partial responses (PR) (18%) (95% CI: 7% to 34%). inducing an objective response rate (RR) of 21% (95% CI: 9% to 38%); 12 (35%) patients achieved a stable disease (SD) and 15 (44%) a progressive disease (PD). The median time to tumor progression (TTP) was four months (range, 0.52 to 21.6 months) and the median survival nine months (range 0.52 to 28 months). This regimen also provided the opportunity for symptomatic improvement of pain, dysuria, haematuria and leg oedema. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was experienced by 9 (27%) patients, grade 3 4 anemia by 6 (18%) and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia by 4 (12%). Six patients were hospitalized due to febrile neutropenia. Despite the prophylactic use of hematopoietic growth factors, 8 (23.5%) patients required dose reduction due to myelosuppression. Grade 3 alopecia occurred in 14 (41%) patients, grade 3-4 nausea in 1 (3%), grade 2 fever in 3 (9%), grade 2-3 diarrhea in 2 ( 6%) and grade 2 allergic reaction in 1 (3%).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine and ifosfamide is an active salvage regimen for the treatment of urothelial cancer and that the treatment also has a tolerable toxicity profile; it warrants further investigation in combination with CDDP in chemotherapy-naïve patients.

A phase II study of 5-fluorouracil and high dose folinic acid in cisplatin-refractory metastatic bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer is a chemosensitive tumour, however, there is no effective therapy for patients with metastatic disease who failed to respond or relapsed after prior treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Single agent 5-fluorouracil has modest activity in bladder cancer. The combination of 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid results in stabilization of the ternary complex of 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate-thymidylate synthetase-5,10 methylene tetrahydrofolate leading to increased DNA inhibition and increased cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen evaluable patients with metastatic bladder cancer were treated with 5-fluorouracil at 300 mg/m2 and folinic acid at 200 mg/m2 daily for five days.

RESULTS

There were no complete or partial responses. One patient had a minor response and three patients had stable disease. Diarrhea and mucositis occurred in 25% of patients. There was one treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

High dose folinic acid did not increase the cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil in metastatic bladder cancer after cisplatin failure.

Phase II trial of ifosfamide, fluorouracil, and folinic acid (FIFO regimen) in relapsed and refractory urothelial cancer

There is no known effective salvage chemotherapy for patients with refractory or relapsed urothelial tumors after methotrexate/cisplatin-based regimen. We report the results of a phase II trial with the FIFO regimen that includes from day 1 to 5: fluorouracil 350 mg/m2, folinic acid 20 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 1000 mg/m2, Q4W. Fifteen patients with metastatic measurable urothelial cancer were enrolled in this trial. Previous therapy included M-VAC regimen in 11 patients, CMV regimen in 3 patients, and both regimens in 1 patient. Thirty-one courses were delivered. Toxicity was moderate, including encephalopathy grade 2 in 2 patients and hematological toxicity grade 3 in 2 others. However, an early death occurred on day 1 in a patient who progressed rapidly and died from hepatic insufficiency after initial encephalopathy. No objective response was seen. Twelve patients progressed during FIFO therapy and 3 patients experienced a stable disease. Despite almost encouraging results of fluorouracil and ifosfamide in the literature, their combination according to our schedule is not active in urothelial cancer.