Combined intensive chemoradiotherapy for organ preservation in patients with resectable and non-resectable oesophageal cancer

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated CtBP1 Gene Editing Enhances Chemosensitivity and Inhibits Metastatic Potential in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells

Innovative therapeutic strategies for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are urgently required due to the limited effectiveness of standard chemotherapies. C-Terminal Binding Protein 1 (CtBP1) has been implicated in various cancers, including ESCC. However, the precise expression patterns and functional roles of CtBP1 in ESCC remain inadequately characterized. In this study, we aimed to investigate CtBP1 expression and its role in the resistance of ESCC to paclitaxel, an effective chemotherapeutic agent. Western blotting and immunofluorescence were applied to assess CtBP1 expression in the TE-1 and KYSE-50 cell lines. We observed the marked expression of CtBP1, which was associated with enhanced proliferation, invasion, and metastasis in these cell lines. Further, we successfully generated paclitaxel resistant ESCC cell lines and conducted cell viability assays. We employed the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system to disable the CtBP1 gene in ESCC cell lines. Through the analysis of the drug dose-response curve, we assessed the sensitivity of these cell lines in different treatment groups. Remarkably, CtBP1-disabled cell lines displayed not only improved sensitivity but also a remarkable inhibition of proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. This demonstrates that CtBP1 may promote ESCC cell malignancy and confer paclitaxel resistance. In summary, our study opens a promising avenue for targeted therapies, revealing the potential of CtBP1 inhibition to enhance the effectiveness of paclitaxel treatment for the personalized management of ESCC.

Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Disease after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of salvage surgery after failed definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for esophageal cancer have been well defined. However, only a few studies have focused on salvage esophagectomy for recurrent disease after CRT.

METHODS

In 227 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT, consisting of 116 patients who underwent esophagectomy for persistent disease (the persistent group) and 111 patients who underwent esophagectomy for recurrent disease (the recurrent group), the short- and long-term outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

The rates of any postoperative complication were similar between the groups (49.1% in the persistent group vs. 49.5% in the recurrent group, p = 0.951), although there was a higher rate of anastomotic leakage in the recurrent group (p = 0.027). Thirty-day mortality was also similar between the groups (1.7% in the persistent group vs. 0.9% in the recurrent group, p = 0.587). The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 33.7% and 28.0% in the persistent group and 48.7% and 41.7% in the recurrent group, respectively (p = 0.0175). In the recurrent group, clinically nodal status before CRT as well as pathologically nodal status and time to relapse were identified as independent prognostic factors. In the persistent group, pT and resection margin were identified as independent factors associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that salvage surgery for recurrent disease can provide acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Considering clinically and pathologically nodal status and time to relapse, adjuvant therapy might be offered for patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy for recurrent disease after definitive CRT.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with elective lymph node irradiation for esophageal cancer: a systemic review and pooled analysis of the literature

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has been accepted as the standard non-surgical treatment for esophageal cancer. However, no consistent conclusions have been reached whether elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) should be delivered. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and pooled analysis to evaluate the value of CCRT with ENI. A literature search based on PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar was carried out and all of the studies were evaluated carefully regarding with survival outcomes, response rates, patterns of failure rates and acute/late toxicities. Twenty-two studies were identified based on the criteria: median overall survival time was 21.0 months; pooled response rates were 56.8% (CR) and 85.8% (CR+PR), respectively; residual disease rate, local-regional recurrence rate, distant failure rate and both (local-regional recurrence plus distant failure) rate was 28%, 21%, 11%, and 7%, respectively; hematologic toxicities were the most sever acute toxicities and esophagus-related toxicity was the most common radiation-related toxicity both in acute (15.7%) and late (6.2%) phase. In conclusion, ENI is feasible with acceptable toxicities in esophageal carcinoma and the efficacy should be verified in randomized trials.

High-dose versus conventional-dose irradiation in cisplatin-based definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis

We investigate whether high-dose (HD, ≥60 Gy) radiotherapy in definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) based on cisplatin could yield benefits compared to conventional-dose (CD) CCRT. PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched and data were pooled and analyzed for response rate, survival, failure patterns and toxicity. Results showed advantages in response rate, 5-year overall survival rate, local regional recurrence and distant failure rate compared to the CD arm with no difference in Grade ≥3 acute and late esophagitis, other toxicities were rare with moderate tolerance, subgroup analysis of squamous cell carcinoma also showed advantages for HD arm. We concluded that ≥60 Gy CCRT improved clinical outcomes compared to the CD arm, especially for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Our findings may provide a basis for future trials.

Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although locoregional failure frequently occurs after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), the role of salvage esophagectomy has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of salvage esophagectomy after high-dose definitive CRT with neoadjuvant CRT.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2007, 33 patients with thoracic esophageal cancer underwent salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT, and 115 patients underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery.

RESULTS

The postoperative mortality rate in the salvage group (12%) was higher than in the neoadjuvant group (3.6%, P = 0.059). The rates of postoperative complications were significantly higher in the salvage group than in neoadjuvant group: Anastomotic leakage (39% vs. 22%, respectively, P = 0.049), bleeding (15% vs. 1.7%, respectively, P = 0.002), cardiovascular complications (24% vs. 5.4%, respectively, P = 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that pretherapy T stage, pretherapy lymph node status, pathological T stage, and operative curability were significant prognostic factors affecting survival of patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy. In particular, patients with cT3-T4 tumors or cN1 tumors before definitive CRT showed worse prognosis after salvage esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage esophagectomy after high-dose definitive CRT was associated with higher postoperative mortality and morbidity rates compared with neoadjuvant CRT. Only selected patients can be rescued by salvage esophagectomy.

Phase I trial of oxaliplatin with fluorouracil, folinic acid and concurrent radiotherapy for oesophageal cancer

This dose escalation study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended doses (RDs) of 5-fluorouracil (5FU), folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) with concomitant radiotherapy in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. Patients received three courses of LV5FU2 regimen (folinic acid 200 mg m⁻², bolus 5FU 300–400 mg/m², continuous infusion 5FU 400–600 mg m⁻² on days 1 and 2) and escalating doses of oxaliplatin 50 to 100 mg m⁻² on day 1 (FOLFOX). This regimen was repeated every 2 weeks, concomitant to a 50-gray radiotherapy per 5 weeks. Three more cycles were delivered after completion of radiation therapy. Three to six patients were allocated to each of the five dose levels until MTD was reached. Thirty-three patients were enroled and 21 had metastatic disease. Maximum tolerated dose was oxaliplatin 100 mg m⁻², and continuous infusion 5FU was 600 mg m⁻² day⁻ (level 5). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, dysphagia and oesophagitis. The RDs were those of FOLFOX-4 regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg m⁻² and full doses of LV5FU2). The overall response was 48.5%, including 12% complete response. Response rate on primary tumour was 62.9%. This FOLFOX-4 regimen was reasonably well tolerated and effective in inoperable/metastatic oesophageal carcinoma and warrants additional investigation.

Surgery alone in the curative treatment of localised oesophageal carcinoma

AIM

To document the results of surgery alone in patients with localised oesophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Between January 1982 and 2002, 179 consecutive patients who underwent curative oesophagectomy for stage 0, I or II oesophageal carcinoma, without neo-adjuvant treatment, were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 2.8 and 30.7%, respectively. The overall actuarial survival rate at 5 years was 59%. No patients with more than four invaded lymph nodes survived 5 years. A lymph node ratio more than 0.2, more than four invaded lymph nodes and an advanced pTNM stage were predictors of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival after surgery alone for localised oesophageal carcinoma can be achieved in some 2/3rds of patients. These results should be considered before designing neo-adjuvant therapeutic regimen or embarking into exclusive treatment alternate to oesophagectomy.

Late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for clinical T1-2 esophageal carcinoma

AIM: This retrospective study was designed to analyze the results and the failure patterns of late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for clinical T_1-2N₀M₀ esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS: From Aug. 1994 to Feb. 2001, 56 patients with clinical T_1-2 esophageal carcinoma received late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy in Cancer Hospital, Fudan University. All patients had been histologically proven to have squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and were diagnosed to be T_1-2N₀M₀ by CT scan. All patients were treated with conventional fractionation (CF) irradiation during the first two-thirds course of the treatment to a dose of about 41.4Gy/23fx/4 to 5 wk, Which was then followed by accelerated hyperfractionation irradiation using reduced fields, twice daily at 1.5Gy per fraction, to a dose about 27Gy/18 fx. Thus the total dose was 67-70Gy/40-43fx/40-49 d.

RESULTS: The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival was 90.9%, 54.6%, 47.8% respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year local control rate was 90.9%, 84.5% and 84.5%, respectively. Twenty-five percent (14/56) patients had distant metastasis and/or lymph nodes metastasis alone. Eight point nine percent (5/56) patients had local disease alone. Another 3.6% (2/56) patients had regional relapse and distant metastasis.

CONCLUSION: Late course accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy is effective on clinical T_1-2 esophageal carcinoma. The main failure pattern is distant metastasis.

The use of chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

The results of treatment for oesophageal carcinoma remain poor and few patients are curable by surgery alone. The use of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) given as a definitive treatment or in combination with surgery may improve locoregional control and survival, when compared with radiotherapy or surgery alone. Using the keywords "chemoradiotherapy" and "radiochemotherapy", a Medline-based literature review (1980-2001) was performed. Additional literature was obtained from original papers and published meeting abstracts. Two-year survival rates of 28-72% in squamous cell carcinoma and 14-29% in adenocarcinoma from definitive CRT were reported. This is comparable to results achievable by surgery alone. The use of preoperative CRT followed by surgery may further improve survival, but current data are insufficient to justify this approach within routine clinical practice. Acute treatment-related toxicity is increased with CRT. In selected patients with localised unresectable oesophageal cancer, definitive CRT is recommended. There are uncertainties about the role of routine surgery following CRT in patients with resectable disease. For the future, the pretreatment staging of patients needs to be improved and standardised, the optimal CRT regimen needs to be defined and the role of predictive markers for CRT response needs to be developed.

Cancer of the esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction: potentially curative therapies

The definition of potential curative tumors of the esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction remains problematic. This is due to a lack of accuracy in clinical staging despite recent advances in CT, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), positron emission tomography scan and minimally invasive staging modalities. As a result much controversy persists regarding indications for surgery and extent of resection and lymphadenectomy. Today surgery with curative option results in five-year survival of over 30%. Multimodality regimens, especially neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, seem to be beneficial in patients with a complete response on pathologic staging. Other indications are investigational and should be studied within carefully monitored study protocols. In early carcinoma T(is)-T(1a) endoluminal ablation technique seem to open promising perspectives provided of discrimination between T(is)-T(1a) and T(1b) can be made by the use of 20mhz EUS probes.

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer carries a poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rate following resection ranges from 10 to 35 per cent. Recent evidence suggests that the addition of non-surgical treatments to surgery may improve resection rates, reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival. This review examines the role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

A Medline-based literature review (1980-2000) was performed using the key words 'neoadjuvant or preoperative' and 'chemoradiotherapy or radiochemotherapy'. Additional literature was obtained from original papers and published meeting abstracts.

RESULTS

Forty-six non-randomized and six randomized trials of preoperative CRT were found. Resection rates, pathological complete response (pCR), treatment-related mortality rates and relapse patterns are documented. Improved 5-year survival rates approaching 60 per cent may be achieved following pCR. Three of the six randomized trials show a benefit in either overall survival or disease-free survival compared with surgery alone. Treatment-related toxicity can be significant.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRT may improve survival. Emerging evidence suggests that CRT alone can achieve similar survival rates to surgery alone. New imaging modalities may help to select which patients require surgery. Larger randomized trials of preoperative CRT or chemotherapy are needed to define optimal regimens and produce higher pCR rates with acceptable toxicity.

Outcome of patients receiving photodynamic therapy for early esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has shown remarkable activity in a variety of human cancers. In the present study, we report the effects of PDT on inoperable early-stage esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-two patients were treated with an argon dye laser (630 nm wavelength, 300-800 mW of power, energy dose of 200-300 J/cm) after intravenous injection of 5 mg/kg of hematoporphyrin derivative. Eighteen patients (29.5%) had in situ carcinoma (Tis), 30 (48.5%) had T1-stage cancer, 7 (11%) had T2-stage cancer, and 7 (11%) had recurrent disease in the anastomotic area after previous surgery without evidence of invasion outside the lumen. Patients with residual disease after two rounds of PDT received definitive radiotherapy. Patients were evaluated for response to therapy and survival. The follow-up time ranged from 3 to 90 months (median, 32 months).

RESULTS

The complete response (CR) rate was 37% (23 of 62) in patients who received PDT alone and 82% (51 of 62) in those who also received radiotherapy. The CR rate after PDT alone was statistically higher (p = 0.04) for patients who had Tis/T1 lesions (21 of 48; 44%) than for those with T2-stage disease (2 of 7; 28%) or recurrent tumors (0 of 7; 0%). Fifty-two percent of patients who had CR following PDT alone did not suffer local tumor recurrence. The median local progression-free survival times after PDT and additional radiotherapy (in cases with incomplete response) was 49 months for Tis- and T1-stage lesions, 30 months for those with T2-stage disease, and 14 months for patients with locally recurrent disease. Patients who completely responded to PDT had a median overall survival (OS) of 50 months, which was significantly longer (p < 0.003) than that of patients not responding to PDT. Toxicity was minimal; we recorded three cases of esophageal stenosis (7%) and one case of tracheo-esophageal fistula (2.5%) after combined PDT and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

PDT is an effective regimen for early esophageal cancer, giving a CR rate of about 40%, long-term local control and favorable overall survival. Additional radiotherapy in cases of incomplete response to PDT is effective and potentially curative in another 45% of cases.

Comparison between chemoradiation protocol intended for organ preservation and conventional surgery for clinical T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective study was designed to compare treatment results of the chemoradiation protocol with conventional surgery for thoracic T1-T2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-six patients with esophageal carcinoma, clinically diagnosed as T1 (tumor invading lamina propria or submucosa) or T2 (tumor invading muscularis propria) were treated for 12 consecutive years, from July 1986 to January 1998. The conventional surgery group included 30 patients who underwent esophagectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Twenty-one of them received postoperative radiotherapy. Thirty-six patients were assigned to the chemoradiation protocol, consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (44 Gy; CDDP: 60 mg/m2, day 1, bolus; 5-FU: 400 mg/m2, day 1-4, continuous), followed by either definitive radiotherapy with high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (total 70 Gy) for responders or surgery for nonresponders as in the conventional surgery group. Surgical candidates in both groups received intraoperative radiotherapy for abdominal lymphatics since 1991.

RESULTS

In the protocol group, 4 patients underwent radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and the remaining 32 underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy. Local control rates at 1 and 3 years were 85% and 70% in the T1/protocol group versus 91% and 80% in the T1/surgery group, and 83% and 83% in the T2/protocol group versus 94% and 80% in the T2/surgery group, respectively. There was no statistical significance. Overall 1- and 3-year survival rates were 100% and 83% in the T1/protocol group versus 82% and 72% in the T1/surgery group (p = 0.36), and 100% and 51% in the T2/protocol group, versus 95% and 68% in the T2/surgery group p = 0.61), respectively. There was no treatment-related mortality in either group. The rates of esophageal conservation were 92% in the T1/protocol group and 58% in the T2/protocol group.

CONCLUSION

The chemoradiation protocol can result in comparable survival with conventional surgery for patients with T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma. A randomized trial between definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery is required.

Final report of Intergroup Trial 0122 (ECOG PE-289, RTOG 90-12): Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

PURPOSE

To determine the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy plus high-dose radiation therapy in patients with local/regional squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-five patients with clinical Stage T1-4N0-1M0 squamous cell carcinoma were entered on a prospective single-arm study, of which 38 were eligible. Patients received 3 monthly cycles of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 h x 5 days) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2 day 1; neoadjuvant segment) followed by 2 additional monthly cycles of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 h x 5 days) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 day 1) plus concurrent 6480 cGy (combined modality segment). The median follow-up in surviving patients was 59 months.

RESULTS

For the 38 eligible patients, the primary tumor response rate was 47% complete, 8% partial, and 3% stable disease. The first site of clinical failure was 39% local/regional and 24% distant. For the total patient group, there were 6 deaths during treatment, of which 9% (4/45) were treatment related. The median survival was 20 months. Actuarial survival at 3 years was 30%, and at 5 years, 20%.

CONCLUSION

This intensive neoadjuvant approach does not appear to offer a benefit compared with conventional doses and techniques of combined modality therapy. However, high dose radiation (6480 cGy) appears to be tolerable, and is being tested further in Intergroup Trial INT 0123.

[Concomitant chemoradiotherapy of cancer of the esophagus]

Radiation therapy with concomitant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for non resectable esophageal carcinoma. For patients with operable tumors, surgery is the traditional treatment. However several data have suggested that preoperative chemo- and radiotherapy could improve therapeutic results. At the present time, no randomized trial has demonstrated, except for adenocarcinoma of the cardia, the benefit of preoperative treatment. Other randomized trials are needed to determine the role and the optimal modalities of these treatments. This is a review of the literature data in concomitant chemotherapy and radiation in the management of esophagus.

Biology of esophageal cancer and the role of combined modality therapy

1. The biology of esophageal cancer involves multifactorial environmental and genetic events. 2. The understanding of the clinical significance of molecular markers is rapidly evolving. 3. Combined-modality approaches should still include surgery in good performance status (ECOG scale < or = 2) patients. 4. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is probably better than surgical resection alone for patients with potentially curable disease, but only validation of this approach by CALGB-9781 can justify this as a new "proven" standard-of-care in the United States. 5. A pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy is the strongest predictor of long-term survival. 6. 5-FU, by either short course or protracted continuous infusion, comprises the backbone of combination chemotherapy in combined-modality design. 7. Radiation therapy should be given at standard 1.8 to 2 Gy/fraction without a scheduled break. 8. Only by enrolling sufficient numbers of patients in prospective clinical trials will clinicians be able to further define the optimal sequencing and actual necessity of each individual component of combined-modality therapy.