Care Quality and Spending Among Commercially Insured Children With Disabilities

Financing the "Village": Establishing a Sustainable Financial System for Child Behavioral Health

An increased need for child and adolescent behavioral health services compounded by a long-standing professional workforce shortage frames our discussion on how behavioral health services can be sustainably delivered and financed. This article provides an overview of different payment models, such as traditional fee-for-service and alternatives like provider salary, global payments, and pay for performance models. It discusses the advantages and drawbacks of each model, emphasizing the need to transition toward value-based care to improve health care quality and control costs.

Access to Home- and Community-Based Services for Children with Disability: Academic Institutions' Role and Areas for Improvement

OBJECTIVE

This project sought to describe provider- and parent-identified needs and barriers to obtaining home- and community-based services (HCBS) for children with disability (CWD) and to determine ways pediatric health care institutions can improve access to HCBS services.

METHODS

In this exploratory sequential mixed methods evaluation, semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with multidisciplinary providers and staff from an independent children's hospital, followed by a survey of English and Spanish-speaking parents of CWD. Data from interviews and surveys were then triangulated for overarching common themes regarding how pediatric health care institutions can better support access to HCBS.

RESULTS

Among 382 parent respondents, 74.1% reported that their child needed a HCBS, most commonly physical/occupational/speech therapies, school-based support, and case management services. Two-thirds of parents reported at least one barrier to accessing HCBS and one-third experience >3 barriers. While multiple current institutional strengths were noted, internal weaknesses included lack of provider knowledge, staffing difficulties, and lack of protocols for identifying and tracking patients needing or receiving HCBS. External threats included requirements to entry for HCBS and transfer of care, with opportunities for improvement involving dissemination of information, funding support, and connection between providers/support staff and services.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents of CWD identified HCBS as necessary for the health of this population, but multiple barriers to HCBS were identified by both parents and providers. Multiple internal and external opportunities for improvement relative to pediatric health care institutions were identified, suggesting a need for a comprehensive approach to ensure that CWD receive necessary HCBS.

Impairment Types and Combinations Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Disabilities: Colorado 2014-2018

OBJECTIVE

Understanding the types of functional challenges faced by adolescents and young adults with disabilities (AYA-WD) can help payers, clinicians, community-based service providers, and policymakers recognize and meet needs. This paper describes state-level prevalence rates for 1) AYA-WD overall and for 2) impairment types singly and in combinations; and 3) examines how rates may differ between those insured by Medicaid versus commercial insurance.

METHODS

This descriptive study uses Colorado's All Payer Claims Dataset 2014-2018 to identify insured 10- to 26-year-olds (Medicaid only: 333,931; commercially only: 392,444). It then applies the previously validated Children with Disabilities Algorithm (CWDA) and its companion, the Diagnosis-to-Impairment-Type Algorithm (DITA), to compare state-level prevalence rates by insurance source for disability overall and for each of five impairment types singly and in combination.

RESULTS

Disability prevalence was greater among the Medicaid-insured AYA-WD by +7.6% points (pp)-Medicaid: 11.9% (47,654/333,931), commercial: 4.3% (16,907/392,444). Most AYA-WD had a single impairment, but the prevalence of AYA-WD with two or more impairments was greater among the Medicaid-insured than the commercially insured (+9.9 pp; Medicaid: 33.5% [15,963/47,654], commercial: 23.7% [3992/16, 907]), as was the prevalence of impairment types that were physical (+6.7 pp; Medicaid: 54.7% [26,054/47,654], commercial: 48.0% [8121/16,907]); developmental (+4.1 pp; Medicaid: 35.4% [16,874/47,654], commercial: 31.3% [5290/16,907]); psychiatric (+6.7 pp; Medicaid 21.3% [10,175/47,654], commercial: 14.6% [2470/16,907]), and intellectual (+9.3 pp; Medicaid: 26.2% [12,501/47,654], commercial: 16.9% [2858/16,907]).

CONCLUSIONS

CWDA and DITA can be used to understand the rates at which impairment types and combinations occur in a population with childhood-onset disabilities.

The Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network for Children With Medical Complexity

In response to a number of emerging issues, in 2017 the federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau funded its first collaborative quality improvement network aimed at improving the quality of life for children with medical complexity, the well-being of their families and the cost-effectiveness of their care. This paper is intended as a brief introduction to the Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network to Advance Care for Children with Medical Complexity or CMC CoIIN project. In it, you will learn about the origins of the project, the guiding principles used to cocreate and promote measurable, meaningful family engagement in systems-level change efforts, its goals and objectives, the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the project and some high-level learnings from our experiences, which have implications for future care delivery improvements for this growing and vulnerable population of children.

Specialist use among privately insured children with disabilities

OBJECTIVE

To investigate primary care practice ownership and specialist-use patterns for commercially insured children with disabilities.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

A national commercial claims database and the Health Systems and Provider Database from 2012 to 2016 are the data sources for this study.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional, descriptive study examines: (1) the most visited type of pediatric primary care physician and practice (independent or system-owned); (2) pediatric and non-pediatric specialist-use patterns; and (3) how practice ownership relates to specialist-use patterns.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

This study identifies 133,749 person-years of commercially insured children with disabilities aged 0-18 years with at least 24 months of continuous insurance coverage by linking a national commercial claims data set with the Health Systems and Provider Database and applying the validated Children with Disabilities Algorithm.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Three-quarters (75.9%) of children with disabilities received their pediatric primary care in independent practices. Nearly two thirds (59.6%) used at least one specialist with 45.1% using nonpediatric specialists, 28.8% using pediatric ones, and 17.0% using both. Specialist-use patterns varied by both child age and specialist type. Children with disabilities in independent practices were as likely to see a specialist as those in system-owned ones: 57.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 56.7%-57.4%) versus 57.3% (95% CI 56.6%-58.0%), respectively (p = 0.635). The percent using two or more types of specialists was 46.1% (95% CI 45.4%-46.7%) in independent practices, comparable to that in systems 47.1% (95% CI 46.2%-48.0%) (p = 0.054). However, the mean number of specialist visits was significantly lower in independent practices than in systems-4.0 (95% CI 3.9%-4.0%) versus 4.4 (95% CI 4.3%-4.6%) respectively-reaching statistical significance with p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing how privately insured children with disabilities use pediatric primary care from pediatric and nonpediatric primary care specialists through both independent and system-owned practices is important for improving care quality and value.