Multiparametric Quantitative Imaging in Risk Prediction: Recommendations for Data Acquisition, Technical Performance Assessment, and Model Development and Validation

Imaging Genomics and Multiomics: A Guide for Beginners Starting Radiomics-Based Research

Radiomics uses advanced mathematical analysis of pixel-level information from radiologic images to extract existing information in traditional imaging algorithms. It is intended to find imaging biomarkers related to the genomics of tumors or disease patterns that improve medical care by advanced detection of tumor response patterns in tumors and to assess prognosis. Radiomics expands the paradigm of medical imaging to help with diagnosis, management of diseases and prognostication, leveraging image features by extracting information that can be used as imaging biomarkers to predict prognosis and response to treatment. Radiogenomics is an emerging area in radiomics that investigates the association between imaging characteristics and gene expression profiles. There are an increasing number of research publications using different radiomics approaches without a clear consensus on which method works best. We aim to describe the workflow of radiomics along with a guide of what to expect when starting a radiomics-based research project.

Multiparametric Quantitative Imaging Biomarker as a Multivariate Descriptor of Health: A Roadmap

Multiparametric quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) offer distinct advantages over single, univariate descriptors because they provide a more complete measure of complex, multidimensional biological systems. In disease, where structural and functional disturbances occur across a multitude of subsystems, multivariate QIBs are needed to measure the extent of system malfunction. This paper, the first Use Case in a series of articles on multiparameter imaging biomarkers, considers multiple QIBs as a multidimensional vector to represent all relevant disease constructs more completely. The approach proposed offers several advantages over QIBs as multiple endpoints and avoids combining them into a single composite that obscures the medical meaning of the individual measurements. We focus on establishing statistically rigorous methods to create a single, simultaneous measure from multiple QIBs that preserves the sensitivity of each univariate QIB while incorporating the correlation among QIBs. Details are provided for metrological methods to quantify the technical performance. Methods to reduce the set of QIBs, test the superiority of the mp-QIB model to any univariate QIB model, and design study strategies for generating precision and validity claims are also provided. QIBs of Alzheimer's Disease from the ADNI merge data set are used as a case study to illustrate the methods described.

Criteria for the translation of radiomics into clinically useful tests

Computer-extracted tumour characteristics have been incorporated into medical imaging computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) algorithms for decades. With the advent of radiomics, an extension of CAD involving high-throughput computer-extracted quantitative characterization of healthy or pathological structures and processes as captured by medical imaging, interest in such computer-extracted measurements has increased substantially. However, despite the thousands of radiomic studies, the number of settings in which radiomics has been successfully translated into a clinically useful tool or has obtained FDA clearance is comparatively small. This relative dearth might be attributable to factors such as the varying imaging and radiomic feature extraction protocols used from study to study, the numerous potential pitfalls in the analysis of radiomic data, and the lack of studies showing that acting upon a radiomic-based tool leads to a favourable benefit-risk balance for the patient. Several guidelines on specific aspects of radiomic data acquisition and analysis are already available, although a similar roadmap for the overall process of translating radiomics into tools that can be used in clinical care is needed. Herein, we provide 16 criteria for the effective execution of this process in the hopes that they will guide the development of more clinically useful radiomic tests in the future.