Diagnostic Performance Comparison Between Ultrasound Attenuation Measurements From Right and Left Hepatic Lobes for Steatosis Detection in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of MASH in Patients With MASLD: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a growing public health problem. The secondary stage in MASLD is steatohepatitis (MASH), the co-existence of steatosis and inflammation, a leading cause of progression to fibrosis and mortality. MASH resolution alone improves survival. Currently, MASH diagnosis is via liver biopsy. This study sought to evaluate the accuracy of imaging-based tests for MASH diagnosis, which offer a non-invasive method of diagnosis.

METHODS

Eight academic literature databases were searched and references of previous systematic reviews and included papers were checked for additional papers. Liver biopsy was used for reference standard.

RESULTS

We report on 69 imaging-based studies. There were 31 studies on MRI, 27 on ultrasound, five on CT, 13 on transient elastography, eight on controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and two on scintigraphy. The pathological definition of MASH was inconsistent, making it difficult to compare studies. 55/69 studies (79.71%) were deemed high-risk of bias as they had no preset thresholds and no validation. The two largest groups of imaging papers were on MRI and ultrasound. AUROCs were up to 0.93 for MRE, 0.90 for MRI, 1.0 for magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and 0.94 for ultrasound-based studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that the most promising imaging tools are MRI techniques or ultrasound-based scores and confirmed there is potential to utilise these for MASH diagnosis. However, many publications are single studies without independent prospective validation. Without this, there is no clear imaging tool or score currently available that is reliably tested to diagnose MASH.

Assessing Quality of Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Results for Liver Fat Quantification

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Algorithms for quantifying liver fat content based on the ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) are currently available; however, little is known about whether their accuracy increases by applying quality criteria such as the interquartile range-to-median ratio (IQR/M) or whether the median or average AC value should be used.

METHODS

AC measurements were performed with the Aplio i800 ultrasound system using the attenuation imaging (ATI) algorithm (Canon Medical Systems, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan). Magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) was the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of the AC median value of 5 measurements (AC-M) was compared to that of AC average value (AC-A) of 5 or 3 acquisitions and different levels of IQR/M for median values or standard deviation/average (SD/A) for average values were also analyzed. Concordance between AC-5M, AC-5A, and AC3A was evaluated with concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

RESULTS

A total of 182 individuals (94 females; mean age, 51.2y [SD: 15]) were evaluated. A total of 77 (42.3%) individuals had S0 steatosis (MRI-PDFF < 6%), 75 (41.2%) S1 (MRI-PDFF 6-17%), 10 (5.5%) S2 (MRI-PDFF 17.1-22%), and 20 (11%) S3 (MRI-PDFF ≥ 22.1%). Concordance of AC-5A and AC-3A with AC-5M was excellent (CCC: 0.99 and 0.96, respectively). The correlation with MRI-PDFF was almost perfect. Diagnostic accuracy of AC-5M, AC-5A, and AC3A was not significantly affected by different levels of IQR/M or SD/A.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of AC in quantifying liver fat content was not affected by reducing the number of acquisitions (from five to three), by using the mean instead of the median, or by reducing the IQR/M or SD/A to ≤5%.

Quantitative Ultrasound and Ultrasound-Based Elastography for Chronic Liver Disease: Practical Guidance, From the AJR Special Series on Quantitative Imaging

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and ultrasound-based elastography techniques are emerging as non-invasive effective methods for assessing chronic liver disease. They are more accurate than B-mode imaging alone and more accessible than MRI as alternatives to liver biopsy. Early detection and monitoring of diffuse liver processes such as steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis play an important role in guiding patient management. The most widely available and validated techniques are attenuation-based QUS techniques and shear-wave elastography techniques that measure shear-wave speed. Other techniques are supported by a growing body of evidence and are increasingly commercialized. This review explains general physical concepts of QUS and ultrasound-based elastography techniques for evaluating chronic liver disease. The first section describes QUS techniques relying on attenuation, backscatter, and speed of sound. The second section discusses ultrasound-based elastography techniques analyzing shear-wave speed, shear-wave dispersion, and shear-wave attenuation. With an emphasis on clinical implementation, each technique's diagnostic performance along with thresholds for various clinical applications are summarized, to provide guidance on analysis and reporting for radiologists. Measurement methods, advantages, and limitations are also discussed. The third section explores developments in quantitative contrast-enhanced and vascular ultrasound that are relevant to chronic liver disease evaluation.

WFUMB Guidelines/Guidance on Liver Multiparametric Ultrasound. Part 2: Guidance on Liver Fat Quantification

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) has promoted the development of this document on multiparametric ultrasound. Part 2 is a guidance on the use of the available tools for the quantification of liver fat content with ultrasound. These are attenuation coefficient, backscatter coefficient, and speed of sound. All of them use the raw data of the ultrasound beam to estimate liver fat content. This guidance has the aim of helping the reader in understanding how they work and interpret the results. Confounding factors are discussed and a standardized protocol for measurement acquisition is suggested to mitigate them. The recommendations were based on published studies and experts' opinion but were not formally graded because the body of evidence remained low at the time of drafting this document.