The effect of oral anti-inflammatory drugs on reducing tooth sensitivity due to in-office dental bleaching: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effect of Glutaraldehyde-Based Desensitizer on Control of Tooth Sensitivity and Tooth Color Post-bleaching: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

 This randomized, controlled, single-blind, split-mouth clinical study evaluated the effect of the application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizer on the prevention of tooth sensitivity (TS) and the changes in the color of the teeth after bleaching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Twenty-five patients were selected for participation in the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients' right and left hemiarches were randomized into two groups: the placebo group, which received distilled water application and whitening treatment, and the Gluma group, which received Gluma application, followed by whitening treatment. The patients were examined after three bleaching sessions with 35% hydrogen peroxide. TS was measured using a numerical rating scale for 21 days from the beginning of bleaching. The tooth color was monitored using a spectrophotometer at times T0 (baseline) and T1 (after 21 days). The color analysis results were recorded using the CieLab system; the CIEDE2000 formula was applied to obtain the ΔE00 and ΔL values.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

 For statistical analysis, the Friedman analysis of variance test was used for intragroup evaluation, and the Wilcoxon test was used for a between-group comparison of the TS results. Student's t-test paired the ΔE00 and ΔL values of the groups. A 5% significance level was adopted.

RESULTS

 Intragroup analysis of the sensitivity results showed a statistically significant difference between the pain levels evaluated through days 1 to 21 (p < 0.001), and the highest median values were observed on the days when the whitening sessions were performed (days 1, 8, and 15) and right after the sessions (days 2, 9, and 16). However, in the intergroup analysis, no statistical difference in sensitivity was found between the placebo and Gluma. No statistical difference was found between the influences of the placebo and Gluma treatments on the color obtained after tooth whitening using parameters ᐃE00 and ᐃL (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 The use of Gluma prior to bleaching does not prevent TS and does not interfere with the color results obtained by tooth bleaching.

Clinical decision-making in tooth bleaching based on current evidence: A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

This review consolidates current knowledge on dentist-supervised tooth bleaching for vital teeth, drawing from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that followed CONSORT guidelines.

DATA RESOURCES

MeSH and free terms like "tooth bleaching," "tooth whitening," "randomized clinical trial," and "systematic review" were used in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases STUDY SELECTION: Out of 839 articles, 444 were selected for full-text review, excluding case reports, non-randomized trials, literature reviews and those not directly related to tooth bleaching or RCTs not following CONSORT 2010. The remaining 203 studies were used to compare the dentist-supervised at-home and in-office clinical protocols, assessing factors such as color change, tooth sensitivity, and gingival irritation. In vitro studies were cited to support and explain basic concepts of different clinical decisions CONCLUSIONS: Daily at-home bleaching with 10 % carbamide peroxide or lower-concentration hydrogen peroxide over three to four weeks is effective. In-office bleaching with high-concentration hydrogen peroxide exhibits variations in protocols based on the HP concentration and gel's pH. Emerging technologies like violet LEDs and photobiomodulation with infrared lasers show promise in enhancing efficacy and reducing sensitivity, respectively, though more research is needed. The review underscores the importance of ongoing research into desensitization strategies to manage sensitivity related to bleaching.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Tooth bleaching is central to dental aesthetics, offering a range of options that can challenge clinicians. Adverse effects, particularly sensitivity, highlight the need for practice supported in protocols clinically tested and effective desensitization approaches.

Efficacy of topical drug application to manage in-office bleaching sensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

To answer whether the topical drug application can reduce in-office tooth bleaching sensitivity without impairing the color change.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024524171). Two reviewers screened PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov in March 2024 independently for randomized clinical trials investigating the efficacy of topical drug application to manage in-office tooth bleaching sensitivity. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool (RoB2). Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations: Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool (GRADE). The meta-analyses evaluated the bleaching sensitivity and color change with RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

334 articles were retrieved. The final sample was composed of four articles. Tested drugs were Otosporin, Eugenol, Ibuprofen with arginine, and Dipyrone. The meta-analysis evidenced no difference in bleaching sensitivity up to 1 h (MD, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.89, 0.11), 24 h (MD, -0.26, 95% CI, -0.71, 0.18), or 48 h (MD, 0.00, 95% CI, -0.16, 0.16). Meta-analysis for color change evidenced no difference for color change (MD, 0.03; 95% IC, -0.56, 0.61). The risk of bias was low. The certainty of the evidence was rated moderate for bleaching sensitivity and high for color change.

CONCLUSIONS

Although topical drug application did not impair color change, it was ineffective in reducing in-office tooth bleaching sensitivity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

topical drug application on dental enamel is not an effective approach in reducing bleaching sensitivity, but several modifications can be made in future studies to possibly achieve a better outcome.

Inorganic Phosphate Effect in a Hydrogen Peroxide-based Bleaching Agent: Physicochemical, Mechanical, and Morphological Properties of Dental Enamel

OBJECTIVES

This in vitro study aimed to assess the impact of incorporating calcium glycerophosphate (CaGP) and sodium fluoride (NaF) in addition to 35% hydrogen peroxide concerning the enamel mechanical and morphological properties.

METHODS

Specimens of bovine enamel were chosen based on their initial surface hardness (SHi) and subsequently divided into five gel groups (n=12): 1) 35% Hydrogen Peroxide (HP) Gel; 2) HP + 0.1% NaF Gel (HP/NaF); 3) HP + 0.25% CaGP Gel (HP/CaGP); 4) HP + 0.1% NaF + 0.25% CaGP Gel (HP/NaF/CaGP) and 5) HP Blue 35% Gel (HP Blue). The bleaching gels were applied thrice, for 40 min, at intervals of 7 days each. After 21 days, the final surface hardness (SHf), integrated hardness (IH), Polydispersity Index (PdI) and Zeta Potential (Zp), surface roughness (Ra, after and before), and surface/structural analysis by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) were determined. The data were submitted to ANOVA (one-way and two-way) followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test (α=0.05).

RESULTS

The addition of NaF to HP reduced demineralization by 11.5% in relation to HP (p<0.05). The NaF/CaGP association reduction is 22.8 and 20% higher in comparison to HP/NaF/CaGP and HP Blue, respectively. The IH when the PH/NaF/CaGP bleaching gel was applied, was 14% higher compared to HP and HP Blue groups.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be concluded that the association of NaF and CaGP with the 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (HP/NaF/CaGP) significantly changed tooth enamel demineralization in terms of surface, depth, roughness, and enamel morphology.

Expanding the applications of photodynamic therapy-tooth bleaching

OBJECTIVES

The current tooth bleaching materials are associated with adverse effect. Photodynamic method based on a novel photosensitizer alone, without combining with peroxides, is evaluated for tooth bleaching application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Teeth samples were randomly divided into 3 groups with different treatment schemes, including negative control group (group A, physiological saline), experimental group (group B, ZnPc(Lys)5), and the positive control group (group C, hydrogen peroxide). Tooth color, surface microhardness, and roughness were determined at baseline, right after the first and second phase of bleaching, as well as 1 week and 1 month post-bleaching. Four samples in each group was randomly selected to evaluate the changes in surface morphology using the scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

The color change values (ΔE) in group B (7.10 ± 1.03) and C (12.22 ± 2.35) were significantly higher than that in group A (0.93 ± 0.30, P < 0.05). Additionally, surface microhardness and roughness were significantly affected in group C, but not in the group A and B. Furthermore, the scanning electron microscope images showed no adverse effect of enamel in the group A and B while the group C demonstrated corrosive changes.

CONCLUSIONS

ZnPc(Lys)5 had a satisfactory bleaching effect and is promising to be a new type of tooth bleaching agent.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The current tooth bleaching materials give a satisfactory clinical outcome and long-term stability, but associated with some adverse reactions. Photosenstizer ZnPc(Lys)5 eliminated the main side effects observed in hydrogen peroxide-based agents on the enamel, and also had a satisfactory bleaching effect and provide a novel selective bleaching scheme for clinical use.

Coadministration of ibuprofen/caffeine on bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity: A randomized clinical trial

This clinical trial evaluated the effect of the coadministration of ibuprofen/caffeine on bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity (TS). A triple-blind, parallel-design, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 84 patients who received ibuprofen/caffeine or placebo capsules. The drugs were administered for 48 hours, starting 1 hour before the in-office bleaching. Two bleaching sessions were performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide gel with 1-week interval. TS was recorded up to 48 hours after dental bleaching with a 0-10 visual analogic scale (VAS) and a 5-point numeric rating scale (NRS). The color was evaluated with VITA Classical and VITA Bleachedguide scales (ΔSGU) and VITA Easyshade spectrophotometer (ΔE*ab and ΔE00). The absolute risk of TS in both groups was evaluated using Fischer's exact test. Comparisons of the TS intensity (NRS and VAS data) were performed by using the Mann-Whitney test and a two-way repeated measures ANOVA, respectively. The color alteration between the groups was compared with the Student's t test. The significance level was 5%. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the absolute risk of TS (p = 1.00) or for the intensity of TS (p > 0.05). A bleaching of approximately 7 shade guide units was observed on the Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide scales, with no statistical difference between the groups. It was concluded that coadministration of ibuprofen and caffeine did not reduce the absolute risk or intensity of TS and did not interfere with the efficacy of dental bleaching.

Topical application of Otosporin® before in-office bleaching: a split mouth, triple-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate if the topical application of Otosporin® before in-office bleaching with a 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP) gel reduces the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS), as well as the bleaching effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty participants were selected for this split mouth, triple-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial. Before each bleaching session, the placebo was applied in the patient's hemi-arch and the other half received the Otosporin®, according to the randomization procedure. Both products were applied topically for 10 min. The 35% HP was applied in two sessions with a 1-week interval. The risk and intensity of TS were assessed using the Numerical Scale (NRS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The bleaching effectiveness were evaluated with the visual scales and with a digital spectrophotometer. The absolute risk of TS was compared by McNemar's test. To compare the intensity of TS, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to evaluate the NRS, while the paired t test was used to evaluate VAS. Bleaching effectiveness (ΔSGUs and ΔE_ab, ΔE₀₀, and ΔWI_D) was compared between groups using the paired t-test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

No significant difference at risk (p = 1.0) and intensity of TS (p > 0.59; VAS and p = 1.00 for NRS) was detected between groups. For both groups, a significant bleaching was observed after 30 days of evaluation (p < 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

The previous application of Otosporin® in the in-office bleaching did not reduce the risk and intensity of TS and did not affect the effectiveness of the bleaching.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The application of Otosporin® before in-office bleaching with 35% HP was not able to reduce the risk and intensity of TS.

A meta-analysis of ozone effect on tooth bleaching

This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of ozone (O₃) in the color change of in-office tooth bleaching in vital teeth (TB) and the sensitivity control. Only randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Seven databases were used as primary search sources, and three additional sources were searched to capture the "grey literature" partially. The JBI tool was used to assess the risk of bias. TB was assessed using the ΔELab color change metric comparing tooth color pre- and post-bleaching. We meta-analyzed the ΔELab estimates per method and calculated the absolute standardized mean difference using random-effect models. The GRADE approach assessed the certainty of the evidence. The ΔELab estimates ranged from 1.28 when the O₃ was used alone to 6.93 when combined with hydrogen peroxide (HP). Two studies compared O₃ and HP alone, but their TB was similar (SMD = - 0.02; 95%CI: - 0.54; 0.49). The bleaching effectiveness for the combination of O₃ + HP compared to HP was similar (SMD = 0.38; 95%CI: - 0.04; 0.81). Thus, based on the available literature, our findings suggest that O₃ is not superior to the conventional technique using HP on the change of tooth color. The O₃ did not present sensitivity when used alone. When O₃ was used in combination with HP, patients reported hypersensitivity only when O₃ was applied before HP, i.e., no sensitivity was perceived when O₃ was applied after HP.

Surface Analysis and Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials Frequently Exposed to a Desensitizing Agent

Background

Patients with tooth sensitivity are frequently exposed to desensitizing agents on a regular basis. These agents might have an impact on the surface properties and color of existing oral restorations. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the color stability, surface microhardness, and surface roughness of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC), amalgomer CR, nanohybrid, and bulk-fill resin composites restorative materials after frequent exposure to a desensitizing agent. Materials and Methods. One hundred and twenty specimens were prepared; 10 specimens for each restorative material were equally subdivided into control and desensitizing-agent-exposed groups in each test. Surface microhardness and surface roughness were evaluated using the Vickers microhardness tester and surface profilometer, respectively. The color change was measured by using a spectrophotometer using the CIE L^∗a^∗b^∗ formula. Surface topography was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The collected data were analyzed with Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey post hoc tests for pairwise comparison at a level of significance of 0.05.

Result

The frequent use of a desensitizing agent significantly decreased surface hardness of RMGIC, amalgomer, and bulk-fill composite materials. However, nanohybrid composite exhibited a significant surface hardness increase. The surface roughness of RMGIC, amalgomer, and nanohybrid composite increased significantly. Meanwhile, the bulk-fill resin composite showed a nonsignificant decrease. Both RMGIC and amalgomer exhibited significantly higher values of color change in comparison to those of nanohybrid and bulk-fill composites.

Conclusion

The bulk-fill composite seems to be more resistant to discoloration and surface topographical changes than other tested materials on frequent exposure to the desensitizing agent. However, this exposure may pose a negative impact on its surface hardness. Bulk-fill resin composite may be the most suitable esthetic restorative in patients who frequently use desensitizing agents.

Longitudinal, Randomized, and Parallel Clinical Trial Comparing a Violet Light-Emitting Diodes System and In-Office Dental Bleaching: 6-Month Follow-Up

Objective: This in vivo study compared two bleaching techniques with regard to the degree of tooth sensitivity (TS), color change, and treatment stability for a 6-month follow-up period. Materials and methods: Sixty volunteers were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and submitted to in-office bleaching. For group 1, we performed one bleaching session with a 35% hydrogen peroxide gel and a second bleaching session after 7 days; for group 2, we performed two bleaching sessions with two applications per session, each session with a 7-day interval, using a light-emitting diodes (LEDs) device emitting violet light (405-410 nm) without employing peroxide-containing bleaching gel. TS was recorded immediately before and immediately after each bleaching session using the Variance Analogic Scale. The color of upper central incisors and upper canines at baseline was recorded immediately after each bleaching session, after 15, 30, and 180 days, with a value-oriented shade guide used by two well-trained observers. Results: The two whitening protocols results were similar regarding the immediate effectiveness and 6-month stability of tooth whitening. Dental bleaching with violet LED did not promote postoperative pain sensitivity at any of the evaluated times. However, dental bleaching performed with 35% hydrogen peroxide promoted higher postoperative pain sensitivity. Conclusions: The violet light alone provided dental bleaching and had the clinical advantage of promoting less immediate postoperative sensitivity; however, an unwanted repigmentation occurred after dental bleaching with light alone.

The use of anti-inflammatory drugs to prevent bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity is ineffective and unnecessary

Data sources The authors searched Medline via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for published and unpublished clinical trials. Only randomised clinical trials, with either a parallel or crossover design, reporting the tooth sensitivity of participants undergoing in-office dental bleaching and comparing pain frequency and severity with oral premedication of a non-steroidal or other anti-inflammatory drug compared with a placebo were used in the review. Studies that evaluated the topical administration of drugs or desensitising agents were not reviewed.Study selection In total,5,050 randomised clinical studies were screened and 11 studies were included in the various meta-analyses. Nine studies examined the effect of pre-emptive analgesics on the risk of sensitivity and ten studies evaluated the effect of drugs on the severity of sensitivity; seven of these studies were assessed as having a low risk of bias.Data extraction and synthesis This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted a priori and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. There were two reviewers who extracted data from the study tables and independently performed quality assessments of the selected trials using the Office of Health Assessment and Translation risk of bias rating tool for human and animal studies. Risk ratios were calculated for the dichotomous sensitivity risk data and mean difference for measures of sensitivity intensity.Results The authors found no effect of the drugs on the risk of sensitivity. Using a visual analogue scale, the authors identified a small but clinically insignificant reduction in the level of sensitivity in the drug-treated group evaluated up to one hour after bleaching. This was not observed when a numerical rating scale was used to measure pain intensity. For the 24-hour pain data, the authors did not find any significant intensity difference between groups. Mean pain intensity scores were generally low in both experimental groups in all randomised controlled trials reviewed. Based on a visual inspection of the funnel plots of all outcomes, the authors concluded that there was no publication bias.Conclusions The data did not support the pre-emptive use of anti-inflammatory drugs in preventing or reducing the intensity of pain caused by in-office tooth bleaching.