Safety and Efficacy of Palbociclib and Radiation Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Initial Results of a Novel Combination

Radiotherapy in the management of lung oligometastases

In recent years, the development of both medical imaging and new systemic agents (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) have revolutionized the field of oncology, leading to a new entity: oligometastatic disease. Adding local treatment of oligometastases to systemic treatment could lead to prolonged survival with no significant impact on quality of life. Given the high prevalence of lung oligometastases and the new systemic agents coming with increased pulmonary toxicity, this article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-art for radiotherapy of lung oligometastases. After reviewing pretreatment workup, the authors define several radiotherapy regimen based on the localization and size of the oligometastases. A comment on the synergistic combination of medical treatment and radiotherapy is also made, projecting on future steps in this specific clinical setting.

Safety and feasibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors treatment combined with radiotherapy in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The addition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) to endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer has led to practice-changing improvements in overall survival. However, there are conflicting data concerning the safety of CDK4/6i combination with radiotherapy, and no consensus guidelines exist to guide practice. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the safety and feasibility of CDK4/6i treatment with radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus, for studies in advanced/metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6i and radiotherapy with the provided safety data on the occurrence of toxicity. The main outcomes were safety (grade 3-5 adverse events), CDK 4/6i dose reduction, and the discontinuation rate due to toxicity.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies comprising 1133 patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients were included. Among them, 617 pts received CDK4/6i and radiotherapy; the median follow-up was 17.0 months (IQR 9.2 - 18.0), and the median age was 58.8 years (IQR 55.5---62.5). The pooled prevalence of severe hematologic toxicity was 29.4% (95% CI 14.0% - 47.4%; I2 = 93%; τ2 = 0.084; p < 0.01 and severe non-hematologic toxicity was 2.8% (95% CI 1.1% - 4.8%; I2 = 0%; τ2 = 0.0; p = 0.67). The pooled prevalence of CDK4/6i dose reduction was 24.0% (95% CI 11.1% - 39.4%; I2 = 90%; τ2 = 0.052; p < 0.01) with no difference between CDK4/6i plus RT vs. CDK4/6i (odds ratio of 0.934; 95% CI 0.66 - 1.33; I2 = 0%; τ2 = 0.0; p = 0.56). The pooled prevalence of CDK4/6i discontinuation due to toxicity was 2.3% (95% CI 0.4% - 5.2%; I2 = 23%; τ2 = 0.002; p = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that radiotherapy in addition to CDK4/6i treatment in breast cancer patients is generally safe and well tolerated and remains a viable treatment option.

Integration of Postoperative Radiation Therapy with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sequential use of radiation therapy before cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors in women with early breast cancer seems reasonable and with a low toxicity rate. This study aimed to evaluate the possible interaction between RT and CDK inhibitors in the adjuvant setting for patients with positive hormone receptors and HER-2 negative, investigating toxicity and the treatment sequencing.

RECENT FINDINGS

CDK inhibitors have been studied in patients with localized breast cancer and can improve invasive disease-free survival outcomes. Regarding the time of RT, all trials used CDK inhibitors after the RT. Interruptions in the CDK inhibitors were performed in 27.1% in Pallas, 17.5% in Penelope-B, and 16.6% in Monarch-E trials due to adverse events. Data from the Natalee trial are still not reported. The main adverse event grade III was neutropenia, with good resolution of the symptoms over time. CDK inhibitors applied sequentially and after RT postoperative showed a low profile of acute toxicity and suitable oncological outcomes.

Safety profile of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors with concurrent radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer, improving survival outcomes compared to endocrine therapy alone. Abemaciclib and ribociclib, in combination with endocrine therapy, have demonstrated significant benefits in invasive disease-free survival for high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients. Each CDK4/6i-palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib-exhibits distinct toxicity profiles. Radiation therapy (RT) can be delivered with a palliative or ablative intent, particularly using stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. However, pivotal randomized trials lack information on concomitant CDK4/6i and RT, and existing preclinical and clinical data on the potential combined toxicities are limited and conflicting. As part of a broader effort to establish international consensus recommendations for integrating RT and targeted agents in breast cancer treatment, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety profile of combining CDK4/6i with palliative and ablative RT in both metastatic and early breast cancer settings.

[Radiotherapy and targeted therapy for the management of breast cancer: A review]

The purpose of this study was to review the current knowledge regarding combinations of the most commonly used targeted therapies or those under development for the management of breast cancer with radiation therapy. Several studies have shown that the combination of radiation therapy and tamoxifen increased the risk of radiation-induced lung toxicity; therefore, the two modalities are generally not given concurrently. The combination of HER2 inhibitors (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) and radiation therapy appeared to be safe. However, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) should not be given concomitantly with brain radiation therapy because this combination may increase the risk of brain radionecrosis. The combination of radiation therapy with other new targeted therapies such as new selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERDs), lapatinib, cell cycle inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or molecules acting on DNA damage repair seems feasible but has been mainly evaluated on retrospective or prospective studies with small numbers of patients. Moreover, there is a great heterogeneity between these studies regarding the dose and fractionation used in radiotherapy, the dosage of systemic treatments and the sequence of treatments used. Therefore, the combination of these new molecules with radiotherapy should be proposed sparingly, under close monitoring, pending the ongoing prospective studies cited in this review.

Safety of CDK4/6 Inhibitors Combined with Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Recent evidence suggests that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors significantly improve progression-free survival and overall survival among metastatic breast cancer patients. However, given the effects on cell cycle arrest, there is potential for CDK4/6 inhibitors and radiotherapy (RT) to work synergistically, enhancing the effect and toxicities of RT. A comprehensive review of the literature on the combination of RT and CDK4/6 inhibitors was performed with 19 eligible studies included in the final analysis. A total of 373 patients who received radiotherapy combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors were evaluated across 9 retrospective studies, 4 case reports, 3 case series, and 3 letters to the editor. The CDK4/6 inhibitor used, RT target, and RT technique were assessed in terms of toxicities. This literature review demonstrates generally limited toxicities with the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and palliative radiotherapy to metastatic breast cancer patients. The current evidence is nonetheless limited, and further results of ongoing prospective clinical trials will help clarify whether these treatments can be safely combined.

Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with metastatic cancer, especially when characterised by a low tumour burden (ie, oligometastatic disease), receiving targeted therapy or immunotherapy has become a frequently practised and guideline-supported treatment strategy. Despite the increasing use in routine clinical practice, there is little information on the safety of combining SBRT with modern targeted therapy or immunotherapy and a paucity of high-level evidence to guide clinical management. A systematic literature review was performed to identify the toxicity profiles of combined metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy. These results served as the basis for an international Delphi consensus process among 28 interdisciplinary experts who are members of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) OligoCare consortium. Consensus was sought about risk mitigation strategies of metastases-directed SBRT combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy; a potential need for and length of interruption to targeted therapy or immunotherapy around SBRT delivery; and potential adaptations of radiation dose and fractionation. Results of this systematic review and consensus process compile the best available evidence for safe combination of metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or oligometastatic cancer and aim to guide today's clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials.

Incidence of and risk factors for non-hematologic toxicity with combined radiotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer using dose-volume parameters analysis: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data on combined radiotherapy (RT) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) risk factors and toxicity. This study aimed to assess the incidence of and risk factors for non-hematologic toxicities in patients treated with combined RT and CDK4/6i using dose-volume parameter analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving RT within 14 days of CDK4/6i use. The endpoint was non-hematologic toxicities. Patient characteristics and RT treatment planning data were compared between the moderate or higher toxicities (≥ grade 2) group and the non-moderate toxicities group.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study. CDK4/6i was provided at a median daily dose of 125 mg and 200 mg for palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively. In patients who received concurrent RT and CDK4/6i (N = 29), the median concurrent prescribed duration of CDK4/6i was 14 days. The median delivered RT dose was 30 Gy and 10 fractions. The rate of grade 2 and 3 non-hematologic toxicities was 30% and 2%, respectively. There was no difference in toxicity between concurrent and sequential use of CDK4/6i. The moderate pneumonitis group had a larger lung V20 equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction and planning target volume than the non-moderate pneumonitis group.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate toxicities are frequent with combined RT and CDK4/6i. Caution is necessary concerning the combined RT and CDK4/6i. Particularly, reducing the dose to normal organs is necessary for combined RT and CDK4/6i.

Safety and Feasibility of Radiation Therapy Combined with CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer

The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy in advanced hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer has led to practice-changing improvements in overall survival. However, data concerning the safety of CDK4/6i combination with radiotherapy (RT) are conflicting. A retrospective evaluation of 288 advanced breast cancer patients (pts) treated with CDK4/6i was performed, and 100 pts also received RT. Forty-six pts received 63 RT courses concurrently and fifty-four sequentially before CDK4/6i initiation (76 RT courses). Neutropenia was common (79%) and more frequent during and after concurrent RT than sequential RT (86% vs. 76%); however, CDK4/6i dose reduction rates were similar. In patients treated with CDK4/6i alone, the dose reduction rate was 42% (79 pts) versus 38% with combined therapy, and 5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity in the combined group. The risk of CDK4/6i dose reduction was correlated with neutropenia grade, RT performed within the first two CDK4/6i cycles, and more than one concurrent RT; a tendency was observed in concurrent bone irradiation. However, on multivariate regression analysis, only ECOG 1 performance status and severe neutropenia at the beginning of the second cycle were found to be associated with a higher risk of CDK4/6i dose reduction. This largest single-center experience published to date confirmed the acceptable safety profile of the CDK4/6i and RT combination without a significantly increased toxicity compared with CDK4/6i alone. However, one might delay RT for the first two CDK4/6i cycles, when myelotoxic AE are most common.

Management of Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: An Expert Committee's Opinion

Patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (BC) are candidates of choice for metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). This paper summarizes the opinions of an expert committee about the management of oligometastatic BC. The experts could complete the questionnaire from 13 September 2021, to 10 October 2021, followed by a discussion. The experts were physicians working in the Province of Quebec (Canada) and specialized in BC care, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists. The experts provided their opinions about the context of the disease and therapeutic approach, local and systemic therapies, and the prognosis of oligometastatic BC. In addition to the expert panel's opinions about the management of oligometastatic disease per se, the experts stated that a prospective data registry should be implemented to collect data about oligometastatic BC to improve knowledge about oligometastatic BC and implement data-driven MDT. These data could also allow for the design of treatment algorithms. In conclusion, this paper presents the expert panel's opinions about the management of oligometastatic BC and highlights the needs to be met to improve the care of this condition.

Safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors and concomitant radiation therapy in patients affected by metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) currently represent the standard of care for the initial treatment of patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. The aim of our study is to evaluate the safety of the use of concomitant radiation therapy (RT) in a consecutive series of HR+/HER2- patients treated in two academic institutions with CDK4/6i in the metastatic setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From September 2017 to February 2020, we retrospectively collected and analysed data on a sequential series of patients treated with CDK4/6i, receiving RT or not, at two European institutions. Primary outcome of the study was the association between RT and any adverse events (AEs) ≥ G3. Secondary outcomes were the association between RT and any AEs (any grade), CDK4/6i dose reduction rate, and CDK4/6i treatment discontinuation rate.

RESULTS

We analysed a total of 132 consecutive women; RT was prescribed in 57 (43.2%) patients (70 irradiated lesions). The median age of the series was 52.1 years (range 32.3-78.2). Concomitant RT administration was not significantly related to higher AEs ≥ G3 (p = 0.19) and any grade AEs (p = 1.0); there was no association with RT and CDK4/6i dose reduction (p = 0.49) and discontinuation rates (p = 0.14). At a median follow-up of 18.8 months, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 35% and the overall survival (OS) rate was 38.7% in the whole group. The use of concomitant RT did not affect both PFS (p = 0.71) and OS rates (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data are encouraging regarding the safety of this combination, showing that concurrent RT did not increase severe toxicity and did not have an impact on systemic treatment conduction.

Radiotherapy with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors: A Multi-institutional Safety and Toxicity Study

PURPOSE

To investigate radiotherapy (RT) toxicity when given with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) compared to RT alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with hormonal receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor-2 negative metastatic breast cancer treated with RT at four cancer centers in Alberta, Canada between 2016 and 2020. Toxicity in patients treated with RT within 30 days of initiating to discontinuing CDK4/6i (RT+CDK4/6i) was compared to toxicity of RT in CDK4/6i naïve patients (RT alone). The primary outcome was acute grade (G) II or higher, non-hematological toxicity within 30 days of RT. We also explored toxicity based on the timing of RT (prior, concurrent, post) in relation to CDK4/6i. Propensity score matching was applied to create comparable cohorts. A generalized linear mixed model was used to evaluate factors associated with acute toxicity.

RESULTS

132 patients (220 RT sites) in the RT+CDK4/6i and 53 patients (93 RT sites) in RT alone were eligible. The rate of acute GII or higher non-hematological toxicity was 11.5% vs. 7%, respectively (p=0.439), and acute GIII or higher non-hematological toxicity was 3.7% vs. 0%, respectively (p=0.151). Acute toxicity in RT+CDK4/6i group was mainly observed when RT was given concurrently (67%) with most of the GIII toxicity recorded. After propensity score matching, the association of acute toxicity with RT+CDK4/6i vs. RT alone was not significant on multivariable analysis, Odds Ratio 3.13 (95% confidence interval: 0.74 - 13.2; p=0.121).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe a significant association between CDK4/6i use and acute, GII or higher, non-hematological toxicity, in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving palliative RT. Given the findings of GIII toxicity, caution is advised whenever CDK4/6i is given concurrently with RT.

Safety and Tolerability of Metastasis Directed Radiotherapy in the Era of Evolving Systemic, Immune and Targeted Therapies

AbstractPurpose

Systemic, immune, and target therapies are growing in use in the management of metastatic cancers. The aim of this review was to describe up-to-date published data on the safety and tolerability of metastasis-directed hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) when combined with newer systemic, immune, and targeted therapies and to provide suggested strategies to mitigate potential toxicities in the clinical setting.

Methods and Materials

A comprehensive search was performed for the time period between 1946 and August 2021 using predetermined keywords describing the use of noncentral nervous system palliative RT with commonly used targeted systemic therapies on PubMed and Medline databases. A total of 1022 articles were screened, and 130 met prespecified criteria to be included in this review.

Results

BRAF and MEK inhibitors are reported to be toxic when given concurrently with RT; suspension 3 days and 1 to 2 days, respectively, prior and post-RT is suggested. Cetuximab, erlotinib/gefitinib, and osimertinib were generally safe to use concomitantly with conventional radiation. But in a palliative/hypofractionated RT setting, suspending cetuximab during radiation week, erlotinib/gefitinib 1 to 2 days, and osimertinib ≥2 days pre- and post-RT is suggested. Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors such as bevacizumab reported substantial toxicities, and the suggestion is to suspend 4 weeks before and after radiation. Less data exist on sorafenib and sunitinib; 5 to 10 days suspension before and after RT should be considered. As a precaution, until further data are available, for cyclin-dependent kinase 4-6 inhibitors, consideration of suspending treatment 1 to 2 days before and after RT should be given. Ipilimumab should be suspended 2 days before and after RT, and insufficient data exist for other immunotherapy agents. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab are generally safe to use in combination with RT, but insufficient data exist for other HER2 target therapy.

Conclusions

Suggested approaches are described, using up-to-date literature, to aid clinicians in navigating the integration of newer targeted agents with hypofractionated palliative and/or ablative metastatic RT. Further prospective studies are required.

Radiotherapy as a tool to elicit clinically actionable signalling pathways in cancer

A variety of targeted anticancer agents have been successfully introduced into clinical practice, largely reflecting their ability to inhibit specific molecular alterations that are required for disease progression. However, not all malignant cells rely on such alterations to survive, proliferate, disseminate and/or evade anticancer immunity, implying that many tumours are intrinsically resistant to targeted therapies. Radiotherapy is well known for its ability to activate cytotoxic signalling pathways that ultimately promote the death of cancer cells, as well as numerous cytoprotective mechanisms that are elicited by cellular damage. Importantly, many cytoprotective mechanisms elicited by radiotherapy can be abrogated by targeted anticancer agents, suggesting that radiotherapy could be harnessed to enhance the clinical efficacy of these drugs. In this Review, we discuss preclinical and clinical data that introduce radiotherapy as a tool to elicit or amplify clinically actionable signalling pathways in patients with cancer.

Incidence and Severity of Myelosuppression With Palbociclib After Palliative Bone Radiation in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Single Center Experience and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor with a primary toxicity of myelosuppression, especially neutropenia, due to cytostatic CDK6 inhibition on bone marrow. Preclinical studies suggest palbociclib may enhance radiation toxicity, but this was only evaluated in limited case series of palliative radiotherapy and not specific to radiation targeting bony metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single institution retrospective cohort study. We included female patients who initiated palbociclib for advanced breast cancer between 2015 and 2019. The primary exposure was receipt of palliative radiation to bony metastases within 1 year prior to starting palbociclib. The primary outcome was the incidence and severity of myelosuppression during cycle one. Secondary outcomes include treatment interruptions and cycle 2 dose reductions, with subgroup analysis of radiation timing, type, dose, and location.

RESULTS

Of the 247 patients, 47 received radiation to bone metastases. Only absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) after cycle one of palbociclib was significantly lower in the group receiving radiation (median ALC 0.84 vs. 1.10 K/mm³, P < .001), with similar rates of neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Patients who received ≥10 fractions radiation were more likely to have cycle one interrupted than those receiving shorter radiation courses (42.9% vs. 11.1%, P = .03). No radiation characteristics were associated with other hematologic toxicities or dose reduction.

CONCLUSION

Palliative bone radiation within 1 year prior to palbociclib initiation was associated with greater lymphopenia during the first cycle than patients unexposed to radiation, but not neutropenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia that would modify treatment.

Novel Combinatorial Strategy Using Thermal Inkjet Bioprinting, Chemotherapy, and Radiation on Human Breast Cancer Cells; an In-Vitro Cell Viability Assessment

Background: Breast cancer (BC) continues to have the second highest mortality amongst women in the United States after lung cancer. For 2021, the American Cancer Association predicted 281,550 new invasive breast cancer cases besides 49,290 new cases of non-invasive breast cancer and 43,600 deaths from the metastatic disease. A treatment modality is radiation therapy, which is given for local control as well as palliation of patient symptoms. The initial step of new drug development is in-vitro cell studies, which help describe new drug properties and toxicities. However, these models are not optimal, and better ones have yet to be determined. This study uses bioprinting technology to elucidate the sensitivity of tumor cells to the combination of palbociclib (PD) and letrozole (Let) treatment. We hypothesize that this technology could serve as a model to predict treatment outcomes more efficiently. Methods: The breast cancer cell lines MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 as well as the normal breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10A, were treated with PD-Let with and without radiotherapy (RT), and cell viability was compared in pairwise fashion for thermally inkjet bioprinted (TIB) and manually seeded (MS) cells. Results: In absence of radiation, the TIB MCF7 cells have 2.5 times higher viability than manually seeded (MS) cells when treated with 100 µM palbociclib and 10 µM letrozole, a 36% higher viability when treated with 50 µM palbociclib and 10 µM letrozole, and an 8% higher viability when treated with 10 µM palbociclib and 10 µM letrozole. With 10 Gy of radiation, TIB cells had a 45% higher survival rate than MS cells at the lowest palbociclib concentration and a 29% higher survival rate at the intermediate palbociclib concentration. Without radiation treatment, at a concentration of 10 μM PD-Let, TIB MDA-MB-231 cells show a 8% higher viability than MS cells when treated with 10 µM PD and 10 µM Let; at higher drug concentrations, the differences disappeared, but some 1.7% of the TIB MDA-MB-231 cells survived exposure to 150 μM of PD + 10 μM letrozole vs. none of the MS cells. These cells are more radiation sensitive than the other cell lines tested and less sensitive to the combo drug treatments. We observed an 18% higher survival of TIB MCF-10A cells without radiation treatment when exposed to 10 μM PD + 10 μM Let but no difference in cell survival between the two groups when radiation was applied. Independent of growth conditions, TIB cells did not show more resistance to radiation treatment than MS cells, but a higher resistance to the combo treatment was observed, which was most pronounced in the MCF-7 cell line. Conclusion: Based on these results, we suggest that TIB used in in-vitro models could be a feasible strategy to develop and/or test new anticancer drugs.

Combination of Modern Radiotherapy and New Targeted Treatments for Breast Cancer Management

Simple Summary

Since the introduction of hormone therapy for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) three decades ago, many new targeted therapies have been developed. Some of them are currently used, such as HER2 inhibitors, while others are still under development, such as cell cycle (CDK) inhibitors, immune checkpoint (PD1/PDL1) inhibitors, or molecules acting on DNA damage (PARP) repair. Besides this, radiation therapy (RT) is commonly used either as adjuvant treatment for early BC after breast conservative surgery or in palliative intent for the treatment of metastatic sites. Our research has shown that the combinations of the most commonly used targeted treatments and RT were feasible with a few toxicities. Nevertheless, most of the knowledge on this subject is based on retrospective studies and a small number of patients and care should be taken in this setting until these results would be confirmed in prospective randomized studies.

Abstract

Background: The objective of the present study was to review the essential knowledge about the combinations of the most commonly used or under development targeted treatments and radiation therapy (RT). Methods: Preclinical and clinical studies investigating this combination were extensively reviewed. Results: Several studies showed that the combination of RT and tamoxifen increased the risk of radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity; therefore, both modalities should not be given concomitantly. The combination of HER2 inhibitors (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) and RT seems to be safe. However, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) should not be administered concurrently with brain RT since this combination could increase the risk of brain radionecrosis. The combination of RT and other new target treatments such as selective estrogen receptor degradants, lapatinib, cell cycle inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or molecules acting on DNA damage repair seems feasible but was essentially evaluated on retrospective or prospective studies with a small number of patients. Furthermore, there is considerable heterogeneity among these studies regarding the dose and fractionation of radiation, the dosage of drugs, and the sequence of treatments used. Conclusions: The combination of RT with most targeted therapies for BC appears to be well-tolerated, but these results need to be confirmed in prospective randomized studies.

Radiotherapy and radiosensitization in breast cancer: Molecular targets and clinical applications

Relatively poor survival outcomes are observed in advanced or metastatic breast cancer, where local control of the primary or metastatic disease may be achieved by surgical resection, local ablative and radiation therapies. Radioresistance, poses a major challenge in achieving durable oncologic outcomes, mandating development of novel management strategies. Although multimodality approaches that combine radiotherapy with chemotherapy, or systemic agents, are utilized for radiosensitization and treatment of various malignancies, this approach has not yet found its clinical application in breast cancer. Some agents for breast cancer treatment can serve as radiosensitizers, creating an opportunity to enhance effects of radiation while providing systemic disease control. Hence, combination of radiotherapy with radiosensitizing agents have the potential to improve oncologic outcomes in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This review discusses molecular targets for radiosensitization and novel systemic agents that have potential for clinical use as radiosensitizers in breast cancer.

Safety of cyclin-dependent kinase4/6 inhibitor combined with palliative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Introduction

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitor is a first-line therapy for metastatic ER+/HER2-breast cancer. However, there are limited data on safety of combined radiotherapy (RT) and CDK4/6 inhibition.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of women with metastatic breast cancer who received palliative RT within 14 days of CDK4/6 inhibitor use. The primary endpoint was toxicity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Secondary endpoints were pain response and local control based on clinical assessment and imaging.

Results

Thirty patients underwent 36 RT courses with palbociclib (n = 34 courses, 94.4%) or abemaciclib (n = 2, 5.6%). RT was delivered before, concurrently or after CDK4/6 inhibitors in 7 (19.4%), 8 (22.2%), and 21 (58.3%) of cases with median 3.5 days from RT to closest CDK4/6 inhibitor administration. Median RT dose was 30Gy (range 8–40.05Gy). Treated sites included brain (n = 5, 11.6%), spine (n = 19, 44.2%), pelvis (n = 9, 20.9%), other bony sites (n = 6, 14.0%) and others (n = 4, 9.3%). No acute grade ≥3 non-hematologic toxicity occurred. No increased hematologic toxicity was attributable to RT with grade 3 hematologic toxicities rates 16.7%, 0%, and 6.7% before, during, and 2 weeks after RT completion. All but one patient (29/30) achieved symptom relief. Local control rates were 94.4%, 91.7% at 6 and 12 months.

Conclusions

The use of RT within 2 weeks of CDK4/6 inhibitors had low acceptable toxicity and high efficacy, suggesting that it is safe for palliation of metastatic breast cancer.

•

CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy is a preferred first line therapy for HR+, HER2-metastatic breast cancer.

•

Limited data exists on safety of combined radiotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibition in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

•

This retrospective cohort study included 30 patients who underwent palliative RT with combined CDK4/6 inhibitor use.

•

RT within 2 weeks of CDK4/6 inhibitor had low toxicity and high efficacy, supporting its safety in metastatic breast cancer.

Updates in endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer

Endocrine therapy (ET) remains the mainstay of treatment for steroid hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Tumor resistance to hormone therapy has led to the development of novel endocrine drug combinations, transforming the landscape of MBC management. The options for ET are expanding, with promising agents in the pipeline. Although MBC remains incurable, many patients can enjoy years of survival with good quality of life by cycling through the many available agents. With the plethora of available agents and rapid approvals, clinicians look to evidence-based guidelines to assist in treatment selection to maximize patient well-being. In this review, we provide a contemporary review of the advances in ET and a suggested algorithm to guide clinicians in daily management of patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC. We will discuss landmark trials and highlight their impact in reshaping treatment approaches. Finally, we will provide a glimpse into advances on the horizon and the promise they bring to improve outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer.

A Preclinical Investigation of GBM-N019 as a Potential Inhibitor of Glioblastoma via Exosomal mTOR/CDK6/STAT3 Signaling

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive brain malignancies with high incidences of developing treatment resistance, resulting in poor prognoses. Glioma stem cell (GSC)-derived exosomes are important players that contribute to GBM tumorigenesis and aggressive properties. Herein, we investigated the inhibitory roles of GBM-N019, a novel small molecule on the transfer of aggressive and invasive properties through the delivery of oncogene-loaded exosomes from GSCs to naïve and non-GSCs. Our results indicated that GBM-N019 significantly downregulated the expressions of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) signaling networks with concomitant inhibitory activities against viability, clonogenicity, and migratory abilities of U251 and U87MG cells. Treatments with GBM-N019 halted the exosomal transfer of protein kinase B (Akt), mTOR, p-mTOR, and Ras-related protein RAB27A to the naïve U251 and U87MG cells, and rescued the cells from invasive and stemness properties that were associated with activation of these oncogenes. GBM-N019 also synergized with and enhanced the anti-GBM activities of palbociclib in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, our results suggested that GBM-N019 possesses good translational relevance as a potential anti-glioblastoma drug candidate worthy of consideration for clinical trials against recurrent glioblastomas.

The role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in early breast cancer

The use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has proven to be a successful strategy in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC), leading to a strong interest in their possible role in the treatment of early luminal BC. In this review we collect the most relevant and recent information on the use of CDK4/6i for the treatment of early BC in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Specifically, we evaluate the results of the large phase 3 adjuvant trials recently released, which have yielded apparently divergent results. We also examine the relevance of biomarkers as response predictive factors for CDI4/6i, the combination between radiotherapy and CDK4/6i, and provide a critical discussion on the evidence that we have so far and future directions of the role of these drugs in the treatment of early BC.

Unexpected toxicity of CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib and radiotherapy

Background

Cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have recently been approved for the treatment of hormone receptor–positive and HER2‐negative metastatic breast cancer in association with endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women. Data on the interaction of CDK4/6 inhibition and radiotherapy are scarce, but some studies show unexpected toxicity.

Cases

We report three cases of unexpected severe or prolonged soft tissue, skin, and gastrointestinal toxicity in patients treated with a combination of radiotherapy and the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib.

Conclusion

These cases indicate a possible interaction between radiotherapy and palbociclib. Therefore, we recommend using radiotherapy cautiously when combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Role of the Combination of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors (CDKI) and Radiotherapy (RT) in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): Advantages and Risks in Clinical Practice

Targeting cell cycle has become the gold standard for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), being cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) cornerstones of its treatment, alongside radiotherapy (RT). To date, no definite evidence regarding safety and efficacy of the combination of CDKIs plus radiotherapy (RT) is currently available. Purpose of this review is to collect data in favor or against the feasibility of the association of CDKIs + RT, describing its potential adverse events. Our review shows how CDKI + RT allows an overall satisfying disease control, proving to be effective and causing a grade of toxicity mainly influenced by the site of irradiation, leaning to favourable outcomes for sites as liver, spine or brain and to poorer outcomes for thoracic lesions or sites close to viscera; controversial evidence is instead for bone treatment. Toxicity also varies from patient to patient. To sum up, our contribution enriches and enlightens a still indefinite field regarding the feasibility of CDKIs + RT, giving cues for innovative clinical management of hormone-responsive MBC.

Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: How to Manage It?

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer among women and represents the second leading cause of cancer-specific death. A subset of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) presents limited disease, termed 'oligometastatic' breast cancer (OMBC). The oligometastatic disease can be managed with different treatment strategies to achieve long-term remission and eventually cure. Several approaches are possible to cure the oligometastatic disease: locoregional treatments of the primary tumor and of all the metastatic sites, such as surgery and radiotherapy; systemic treatment, including target-therapy or immunotherapy, according to the biological status of the primary tumor and/or of the metastases; or the combination of these approaches. Encouraging results involve local ablative options, but these trials are limited by being retrospective and affected by selection bias. Systemic therapy, e.g., the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER-2 negative BC, leads to an increase of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in all the subgroups, with favorable toxicity. Regardless of the lack of substantial data, this subset of patients could be treated with curative intent; the appropriate candidates could be mostly young women, for whom a multidisciplinary aggressive approach appears suitable. We provide a global perspective on the current treatment paradigms of OMBC.

Concurrent Radiation and Modern Systemic Therapies for Breast Cancer: An Ever-Expanding Frontier

Radiotherapy is a critical tool for reducing locoregional recurrence, extending survival, and palliating symptoms in patients with breast cancer. With an ever-expanding armamentarium of systemic agents available, and an increasing trend toward the use of hypofractionated radiation regimens, it can be difficult to determine the safety of concurrent therapy. In particular, new targeted agents in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting have limited prospective or long-term data demonstrating safety when delivered concurrently with radiotherapy. Other systemic agents, including chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, are also important components of the overall treatment strategy for localized and metastatic breast cancer, and are often delivered concurrently with radiation in certain clinical scenarios. This review explores the safety, efficacy, and pitfalls of delivering radiation in conjunction with systemic therapies for breast cancer.

Safety of palbociclib concurrent with palliative pelvic radiotherapy: discussion of a case of increased toxicity and brief review of literature

Several cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are indicated in the treatment of metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative breast cancer which includes palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Pelvic radiation therapy (RT) is often indicated for symptomatic or progressive bone metastasis. There are limited data on concurrent use of CDK4/6 inhibitors with pelvic RT with few retrospective studies in the literature involving a small number of patients. The major side effects of these agents include haematological toxicities, while non-haematological toxicities are less severe. There are concerns for an increased possibility of synergistic toxicity with concurrent use of CDK4/6 inhibitors with pelvic RT. Here we describe an instance of acute grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and discuss the relevant literature. A 77-year-old lady treated with palliative conventional RT 30 Gy/ 10 fractions concurrently with palbociclib to left hemipelvis and proximal femur, developed severe pancolitis starting 5 days from last RT. She needed inpatient care for 3 weeks and recovered with mesalamine and supportive care. We also postulate a few strategies that can be adopted in patients receiving palliative RT in such a scenario. The agents should be stopped 1 week before, during and for a time (1 week minimally) after RT. A shorter course of 5 fractions (and ablative RT as indicated) can be considered to minimise treatment gaps. Highly conformal techniques (intensity-modulated radiotherapy/ volumetric-modulated arc therapy) can significantly reduce bowel dose and should be considered in patients with pre-existing GI comorbidities or prior GI toxicity with these agents.

CDK 4/6 inhibitors combined with radiotherapy: A review of literature

•

CDK 4/6 inhibitors - palbociclib, ribociclib and abomaciclib - were approved by EMA.

•

They are currently prescribed in combination with hormone therapy to treat hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer.

•

Most pre-clinical studies refer to the synergistic effect of CDK4/6i-radiotherapy combination.

•

The issue of their safe combined use with palliative or curative radiotherapy has only been explored through limited retrospective data.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) namely palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib were granted approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2017 and 2018. They are currently prescribed in combination with hormone therapy to treat hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. Their combination with radiotherapy raises safety concerns as preclinical data enlightened their possible synergistic effect. Moreover, data about toxicity when combining CDK4/6i with radiotherapy are scarce. This review of literature focused on the use of CDK4/6i combined with radiotherapy. It aimed at listing every published data about such combination so as to understand its possible resulting toxicity in metastatic breast cancer.

Enhanced toxicity with CDK 4/6 inhibitors and palliative radiotherapy: Non-consecutive case series and review of the literature

5•

CDK 4/6 inhibitors are commonly used in patients with advanced hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

5•

Many patients receive palliative radiotherapy for symptomatic disease concomitantly with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor.

5•

There is a paucity of data on the safety of combining a CDK 4/6 inhibitor with palliative radiotherapy.

5•

We report on 5 cases at our institution where enhanced radiotherapy toxicity was observed when RT was delivered during or prior to treatment with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor.

5•

We review pre-clinical and mechanistic data and hypothesise on possible mechanisms for this phenomenon.

Current first-line systemic treatment in most patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER-2 negative breast cancer is an aromatase inhibitor in combination with a cyclin dependant kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor. Frequently, these patients require palliative radiotherapy (RT) for symptomatic disease management. There is a paucity of data on the safety of combining a CDK 4/6 inhibitor with palliative RT, with conflicting case reports in the literature. We report on 5 cases at our institution where enhanced radiotherapy toxicity was observed when palliative doses of RT was delivered during or prior to treatment with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor. After review of pre-clinical and mechanistic data, we hypothesise that the effects of CDK4/6 inhibition on normal tissue and the tumour microenvironment may impede tissue recovery and exacerbate acute radiation and radiation recall toxicities. Further studies are required to clarify the potential toxicities of this combination. Clinicians should consider the potential risks when combining CDK 4/6 inhibitors with palliative RT and individualise patient management accordingly.

Is there a role for locoregional treatment of the primary tumor in de novo metastatic breast cancer in the era of tailored therapies?: Evidences, unresolved questions and a practical algorithm

Improvements in systemic therapies have changed the face of de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC), with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 25 %. Increasing evidence suggests that a subset of patients could benefit from a locoregional treatment (LRT) with prolonged survival, although the diversity of publications on the subject make it difficult to draw any conclusions. In this review, we summarize the available data on retrospective, prospective and current ongoing clinical trials. Since factors such as tumor biology, pattern of metastatic dissemination and the timing of the treatment are closely linked to the therapeutic strategy, we focus on papers which include these aspects. We discuss recent studies indicating that exclusive radiotherapy provides results comparable with those obtained by surgery. We will then discuss the biological rationale for LRT. Finally, we propose a decision-tree to select the optimal candidates for LRT in dnMBC patients.

Real-World Clinical Data of Palbociclib in Asian Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Experiences from Eight Institutions

Purpose

Use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors improved survival outcome of hormone receptor (HR) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, including Asian population. However, Asian real-world data of palbociclib is limited. We analyzed the real-world clinical practice patterns and outcome in HR-positive, MBC Asian patients treated with palbociclib.

Materials and Methods

Between April 2017 to November 2019, 169 HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor-2–negative MBC patients treated with letrozole or fulvestrant plus palbocilib were enrolled from eight institutions. Survival outcome (progression-free survival [PFS]), treatment response and toxicity profiles were analyzed.

Results

Median age of letrozole plus palbociclib (145 patients, 85.8%) and fulvestrant plus palbociclib (24 patients, 14.2%) was 58 and 53.5 years, with median follow-up duration of 14.63 months (range 0.2 to 33.9 months). Median PFS (mPFS) of letrozole plus palbociclib and fulvestrant plus palbociclib was 25.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.1 to not reached) and 6.37 months (95% CI, 5.33 to not reached), comparable to previous phase 3 trials. In letrozole plus palbociclib arm, luminal A (hazard ratio, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.20 to 6.80; p=0.017) and patients with good performance (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0–1 [hazard ratio, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.70 to 7.96]) showed better mPFS. In fulvestrant plus palbociclib group, chemotherapy naïve patients showed better mPFS (hazard ratio, 12.51, 95% CI, 1.59 to 99.17; p=0.017). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event was neutropenia (letrozole 86.3%, fulvestrant 88.3%).

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first real-world data of palbociclib reported in Asia. Palbociclib showed comparable benefit to previous phase 3 trials in Asian patients during daily clinical practice.

Short-term CDK4/6 Inhibition Radiosensitizes Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have improved progression-free survival for metastatic, estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) breast cancers, but their role in the nonmetastatic setting remains unclear. We sought to understand the effects of CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) and radiotherapy in multiple preclinical breast cancer models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses were used to identify significantly altered pathways after CDK4/6i. Clonogenic assays were used to quantify the radiotherapy enhancement ratio (rER). DNA damage was quantified using γH2AX staining and the neutral comet assay. DNA repair was assessed using RAD51 foci formation and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) reporter assays. Orthotopic xenografts were used to assess the efficacy of combination therapy.

RESULTS

Palbociclib significantly radiosensitized multiple ER⁺ cell lines at low nanomolar, sub IC₅₀ concentrations (rER: 1.21-1.52) and led to a decrease in the surviving fraction of cells at 2 Gy (P < 0.001). Similar results were observed in ribociclib-treated (rER: 1.08-1.68) and abemaciclib-treated (rER: 1.19-2.05) cells. Combination treatment decreased RAD51 foci formation (P < 0.001), leading to a suppression of homologous recombination activity, but did not affect NHEJ efficiency (P > 0.05). Immortalized breast epithelial cells and cells with acquired resistance to CDK4/6i did not demonstrate radiosensitization (rER: 0.94-1.11) or changes in RAD51 foci. In xenograft models, concurrent palbociclib and radiotherapy led to a significant decrease in tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies provide preclinical rationale to test CDK4/6i and radiotherapy in women with locally advanced ER⁺ breast cancer at high risk for locoregional recurrence.

CDK4/6 inhibitors: a novel strategy for tumor radiosensitization

Recently, the focus of enhancing tumor radiosensitivity has shifted from chemotherapeutics to targeted therapies. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are a novel class of selective cell cycle therapeutics that target the cyclin D-CDK4/6 complex and induce G1 phase arrest. These agents have demonstrated favorable effects when used as monotherapy or combined with endocrine therapy and targeted inhibitors, stimulating further explorations of other combination strategies. Multiple preclinical studies have indicated that CDK4/6 inhibitors exhibit a synergistic effect with radiotherapy both in vitro and in vivo. The principal mechanisms of radiosensitization effects include inhibition of DNA damage repair, enhancement of apoptosis, and blockade of cell cycle progression, which provide the rationale for clinical use. CDK4/6 inhibitors also induce cellular senescence and promote anti-tumor immunity, which might represent potential mechanisms for radiosensitization. Several small sample clinical studies have preliminarily indicated that the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and radiotherapy exhibited well-tolerated toxicity and promising efficacy. However, most clinical trials in combined therapy remain in the recruitment stage. Further work is required to seek optimal radiotherapy-drug combinations. In this review, we describe the effects and underlying mechanisms of CDK4/6 inhibitors as a radiosensitizer and discuss previous clinical studies to evaluate the prospects and challenges of this combination.

Combined Radiotherapy and New Systemic Therapies - Have We Moved Beyond Palliation?

The new systemic therapies for cancer are having major impacts on the prognosis of patients with advanced cancers, some achieving long-term survival with targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Interactions of radiotherapy with the new systemic therapies are reviewed. Many agents increase radiosensitivity and particular caution is required combining BRAF inhibitors and radiotherapy because of significant toxicity. Most new systemic therapies can be used safely with palliative doses of radiotherapy, but it is important to be aware of overlapping toxicities depending on the site treated. DNA damage response modulators increase radiosensitivity and may potentially increase radiation toxicity but are at an earlier stage of development. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy may produce further survival gains in patients responding to targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer: Radiotherapy, Local Approach and Systemic Therapy in a Guide for Clinicians

The standard care for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is systemic therapies with imbrication of focal treatment for symptoms. Recently, thanks to implementation of radiological and metabolic exams and development of new target therapies, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive settings are even more common-paving the way to a paradigm change of focal treatments role. In fact, according to immunophenotype, radiotherapy can be considered with radical intent in these settings of patients. The aim of this literature review is to analyze available clinical data on prognosis of bone metastases from breast cancer and benefits of available treatments for developing a practical guide for clinicians.

A single-center retrospective safety analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors concurrent with radiation therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients

Cyclin dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors gained an essential role in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Nevertheless, data regarding their use in combination with radiotherapy are still scarce. We performed a retrospective preliminary analysis of breast cancer patients treated at our Center with palliative radiation therapy and concurrent CDK4/6 inhibitors. Toxicities were measured according to CTCAE 4.0, local response according to RECIST 1.1 or PERCIST 1.0 and pain control using verbal numeric scale. 18 patients (32 treated sites) were identified; 50% received palbociclib, 33.3% ribociclib and 16.7% abemacliclib. Acute non-hematologic toxicity was fair, with the only exception of a patient who developed G3 ileitis. During 3 months following RT, 61.1% of patients developed G 3–4 neutropenia; nevertheless no patient required permanent suspension of treatment. Pain control was complete in 88.2% of patients three months after radiotherapy; 94.4% of patients achieved and maintained local control of disease. Radiotherapy concomitant to CDK4/6 inhibitors is feasible and characterized by a fair toxicity profile, with isolated episodes of high-grade reversible intestinal toxicity. Rate of G 3–4 neutropenia was comparable with that measured for CDK4/6 inhibitors alone. Promising results were reported in terms of pain relief and local control of disease.

Concurrent use of palbociclib and radiation therapy: single-centre experience and review of the literature

Palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy increases progression-free survival in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (BC). In this study, we retrospectively evaluated safety in the first patient treated with concurrent use of palbociclib and radiation therapy (RT) in the Curie Institute. Between April 2017 and August 2019, 30 women with metastatic BC received locoregional and/or symptomatic irradiation at a metastatic site concurrently with palbociclib. The most common acute toxicities were radiodermatitis and neutropenia. Palbociclib had to be discontinued during RT in three locally treated patients who developed grade 3 radiodermatitis and febrile neutropenia, grade 2 dysphagia and metastatic disease progression, respectively. After a follow-up of at least 6 months, none of the patients had late toxicity. Concomitant administration of palbociclib with RT was reasonably well tolerated in our series of 30 patients. More prospective data with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these results.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors Combined With Radiotherapy for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represent the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Data about the balance between efficacy and toxicity of combined palliative radiotherapy (RT) and CDK4/6 inhibition are lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We undertook a review of 46 patients with metastatic breast cancer on systemic treatment with CDK4/6i who underwent 62 metastases-directed RT. Clinical, laboratory, and RT treatment planning data were collected. Statistical analyses included Student t test, paired sample t test, and logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (65.2%) received palbociclib, 15 (32.6%) received ribociclib, and one patient received abemaciclib (2.2%). Median total prescribed RT dose was 20 Gy (range, 8-63 Gy). Sites of RT were bone (n = 50; 80.7%), visceral (n = 7; 11.3%), or brain metastases (n = 3; 4.8%), as well as primary tumor of the breast (n = 2; 3.2%). Overall, the rates of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were 6.5%, 4.3%, 15.2%, and 23.9% before the start of RT, during RT, 2 and 6 weeks after RT completion, respectively. We found no correlation between dose distribution to organs at risk and the development of AEs. The local control rates for the entire cohort were 98% at 6 months and 90% at 12 months. Overall, pain relief (complete or partial) was experienced by 80% (24/30) of patients who initially reported pain at the treated metastatic site.

CONCLUSION

We observed a modest increase in the rates of grade 3 or higher AEs after combined RT and CDK4/6i, with maintained efficacy of concomitant RT.

CDK4/6 inhibition suppresses tumour growth and enhances the effect of temozolomide in glioma cells

In adults, glioma is the most commonly occurring and invasive brain tumour. For malignant gliomas, the current advanced chemotherapy includes TMZ (temozolomide). However, a sizeable number of gliomas are unyielding to TMZ, hence, giving rise to an urgent need for more efficient treatment choices. Here, we report that cyclin-dependent kinases 4 (CDK4) is expressed at significantly high levels in glioma cell lines and tissues. CDK4 overexpression enhances colony formation and proliferation of glioma cells and extends resistance to inhibition of TMZ-mediated cell proliferation and induction of apoptosis. However, CDK4 knockdown impedes colony formation and cell proliferation, and enhances sensitivity of glioma cells to TMZ. The selective inhibition of CDK4/6 impedes glioma cell proliferation and induces apoptotic induction. The selective inhibitors of CDK4/6 may enhance glioma cell sensitivity to TMZ. We further showed the possible role of RB phosphorylation mediated by CDK4 for its oncogenic function in glioma. The growth of glioma xenografts was inhibited in vivo, through combination treatment, and corresponded to enhanced p-RB levels, reduced staining of Ki-67 and enhanced activation of caspase 3. Therefore, CDK4 inhibition may be a favourable strategy for glioma treatment and overcomes TMZ resistance.

Management of brain metastases in breast cancer: a review of current practices and emerging treatments

PURPOSE

Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are becoming an increasingly common diagnosis due to improved systemic control and more routine surveillance imaging. Treatment continues to require a multidisciplinary approach managing systemic and intracranial disease burden. Although, improvements have been made in the diagnosis and management of BCBM, brain metastasis patients continue to pose a challenge for practitioners.

METHODS

In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in the treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of BCBM.

RESULTS

We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation for BCBM. Furthermore, we discuss the ongoing prospective trials enrolling BCBM patients and their biologic rationale.

CONCLUSIONS

BCBM management is an increasing clinical concern. Multidisciplinary management combining the strengths of surgical, systemic, and radiation treatment modalities with prospective trials incorporating knowledge from the basic and translational sciences will ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes for BCBM patients.

Palliative Radiotherapy: Inpatients, Outpatients, and the Changing Role of Supportive Care in Radiation Oncology

Palliative radiotherapy is an effective treatment in alleviating many symptoms of advanced cancer. Short courses of radiotherapy provide rapid symptom relief and minimize impact on patients. Patients referred for palliative radiotherapy have many concerns beyond radiotherapy; often, these concerns are not fully addressed in traditional radiotherapy clinics. Discussions of prognosis, patient goals, and concerns are areas for improved collaboration. Innovative, dedicated palliative radiotherapy programs have developed over the past 20 years to provide holistic care to patients referred for palliative radiotherapy and have improved patient-focused outcomes. Advanced radiotherapy techniques may provide opportunities to further improve palliative radiotherapy outcomes.