1
|
Cai X, Li P, Zhao J, Wang W, Cheng J, Zhang G, Cai S, Zhang Z, Jiang G, Zhang Q, Wang Z. Definitive carbon ion re-irradiation with pencil beam scanning in the treatment of unresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2023; 64:933-939. [PMID: 37738440 PMCID: PMC10665299 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes and safety of carbon ion re-irradiation with pencil beam scanning (PBS) delivery technique for previously irradiated and unresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Between June 2017 and September 2021, 24 patients of unresectable LRRC with prior pelvic photon radiotherapy who underwent carbon ion re-irradiation at our institute were retrospectively analyzed. Carbon ion radiotherapy was delivered by raster scanning with a median relative biological effectiveness-weighted dose of 72 Gy in 20 fractions. Weekly CT reviews were carried out, and offline adaptive replanning was performed whenever required. The median follow-up duration was 23.8 months (range, 6.2-47.1 months). At the last follow-up, two patients had a local disease progression, and 11 patients developed distant metastases. The 1- and 2-year local control, progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 100 and 93.3%, 70.8 and 45.0% and 86.7 and 81.3%, respectively. There were no Grade 3 or higher acute toxicities observed. Three patients developed Grade 3 late toxicities, one each with gastrointestinal toxicity, skin reaction and pelvic infection. In conclusion, definitive carbon ion re-irradiation with PBS provided superior oncologic results with tolerable toxicities and may be served as a curative treatment strategy in unresectable LRRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingfang Zhao
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiwei Wang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingyi Cheng
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Guangyuan Zhang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Sanjun Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Guoliang Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohamed Yoosuf AB, Alshehri S, Abdul Aziz MZ, Mansor S, Appalanaido GK, Alqathami M. Effectiveness of Robotic Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Patients Undergoing Re-irradiation: A Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e43500. [PMID: 37719625 PMCID: PMC10500384 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a possible treatment option for patients who develop recurrence within or at the edge of a previously irradiated volume. Robotic stereotactic radiotherapy is the result of technological advances in robotic precision, real-time imaging, non-invasive, highly customizable treatment plan, and delivery with sub-millimeter accuracy. This article reviews the radiobiologic, technical, and clinical aspects of robotic-based SABR re-irradiation for various anatomical sites. An extensive literature search was performed to identify articles on the utilization of robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for patients undergoing re-irradiation. The reported prescription dose and fractionation data along with outcomes such as overall survival, local control rates, and toxicities were qualitatively reviewed. The findings consistently indicate that re-irradiation using robotic SABR provides encouraging survival rates with minimal toxicity in the clinical setting of various anatomical sites delivered using locally non-invasive means where other treatment options are scarce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahamed Badusha Mohamed Yoosuf
- Oncology, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, SAU
- Oncology/Radiation Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Salem Alshehri
- Radiation Oncology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, SAU
- Oncology, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Mohd Zahri Abdul Aziz
- Advanced Management of Liver Malignancies Program, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Penang, MYS
| | - Syahir Mansor
- Advanced Management of Liver Malignancies Program, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Penang, MYS
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Pusat Perubatan Universiti Sains Malaysia, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Penang, MYS
| | - Gokula Kumar Appalanaido
- Advanced Management of Liver Malignancies Program, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Penang, MYS
- Radiotherapy Unit, Pusat Perubatan Universiti Sains Malaysia, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Penang, MYS
| | - Mamdouh Alqathami
- Department of Oncology, Ministry of National Guard, Health Affairs, Riyadh, SAU
- Clinical Research, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, SAU
- Radiological Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McKigney N, Houston F, Ross E, Velikova G, Brown J, Harji DP. Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3969-3986. [PMID: 37071237 PMCID: PMC10250265 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13388-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The availability of high-quality patient-reported outcome (PRO) data is crucial to guiding shared decision-making in the context of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), where potential treatment benefits must be balanced against the impact of both the disease and treatment on PROs, such as quality of life. This review aimed to identify the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) currently being reported in LRRC and to appraise the methodological quality of studies using these measures. METHODS PubMed, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched, including studies published up until 14th September 2022. Studies in adults with LRRC reporting PROMS as a primary or secondary outcome measure were included. Data were extracted concerning the methodological quality of the reporting of PROMs using criteria informed by the CONSORT-PRO checklist and the psychometric properties of the PROMs identified using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. RESULTS Thirty-five studies including 1914 patients with LRRC were identified. None of the studies included in the review met all eleven criteria for the quality of reporting of PROMs. Seventeen PROMs and two clinician-reported outcome measures were identified, none of which have been validated for use in patients with LRRC. CONCLUSIONS None of the PROMs which are currently being used to report PROs in LRRC have been validated for use in this cohort of patients. Future studies in this disease area should focus on utilising PROMs that have undergone a robust development process including patients with LRRC, to produce data which is high quality, accurate and relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh McKigney
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | | | - Ellen Ross
- Inverclyde Royal Hospital, Greenock, Scotland, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- St. James's Institute of Oncology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Julia Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Deena Pravin Harji
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murray L, Thompson C, Pagett C, Lilley J, Al-Qaisieh B, Svensson S, Eriksson K, Nix M, Aldred M, Aspin L, Gregory S, Appelt A. Treatment plan optimisation for reirradiation. Radiother Oncol 2023; 182:109545. [PMID: 36813170 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The STRIDeR (Support Tool for Re-Irradiation Decisions guided by Radiobiology) project aims to create a clinically viable re-irradiation planning pathway within a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). Such a pathway should account for previously delivered dose, voxel-by-voxel, taking fractionation effects, tissue recovery and anatomical changes into account. This work presents the workflow and technical solutions in the STRIDeR pathway. METHODS The pathway was implemented in RayStation (version 9B DTK) to allow an original dose distribution to be used as background dose to guide optimisation of re-irradiation plans. Organ at risk (OAR) planning objectives in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) were applied cumulatively across the original and re-irradiation treatments, with optimisation of the re-irradiation plan performed voxel-by-voxel in EQD2. Different approaches to image registration were employed to account for anatomical change. Data from 21 patients who received pelvic Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) re-irradiation were used to illustrate the use of the STRIDeR workflow. STRIDeR plans were compared to those produced using a standard manual method. RESULTS The STRIDeR pathway resulted in clinically acceptable plans in 20/21 cases. Compared to plans produced using the laborious manual method, less constraint relaxation was required or higher re-irradiation doses could be prescribed in 3/21. CONCLUSION The STRIDeR pathway used background dose to guide radiobiologically meaningful, anatomically-appropriate re-irradiation treatment planning within a commercial TPS. This provides a standardised and transparent approach, offering more informed re-irradiation and improved cumulative OAR dose evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Murray
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| | - Christopher Thompson
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Christopher Pagett
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - John Lilley
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Bashar Al-Qaisieh
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Michael Nix
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Aldred
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Lynn Aspin
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephen Gregory
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Ane Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Floberg JM, Blitzer GC, Yadav P. Use of stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy for treatment of a pelvic recurrence of prostate cancer in a patient with an orthotopic neobladder. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100958. [PMID: 35647410 PMCID: PMC9130090 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- John M. Floberg
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine; and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
- Corresponding author.
| | - Grace C. Blitzer
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine; and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Poonam Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chuong MD, Bryant JM, Herrera R, McCulloch J, Contreras J, Kotecha R, Romaguera T, Alvarez D, Hall MD, Rubens M, Mehta MP, Kaiser A, Tom M, Gutierrez AN, Mittauer KE. Dose-Escalated Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided Abdominopelvic Reirradiation With Continuous Intrafraction Visualization, Soft Tissue Tracking, and Automatic Beam Gating. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100840. [PMID: 35146215 PMCID: PMC8802055 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods and Materials Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
7
|
Slevin F, Aitken K, Alongi F, Arcangeli S, Chadwick E, Chang AR, Cheung P, Crane C, Guckenberger M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Kamran SC, Kinj R, Loi M, Mahadevan A, Massaccesi M, Mendez LC, Muirhead R, Pasquier D, Pontoriero A, Spratt DE, Tsang YM, Zelefsky MJ, Lilley J, Dickinson P, Hawkins MA, Henry AM, Murray LJ. An international Delphi consensus for pelvic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy re-irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:104-114. [PMID: 34560186 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is increasingly used to treat metastatic oligorecurrence and locoregional recurrences but limited evidence/guidance exists in the setting of pelvic re-irradiation. An international Delphi study was performed to develop statements to guide practice regarding patient selection, pre-treatment investigations, treatment planning, delivery and cumulative organs at risk (OARs) constraints. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-one radiation oncologists were invited to participate in three online surveys. In Round 1, information and opinion was sought regarding participants' practice. Guidance statements were developed using this information and in Round 2 participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with each statement. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. In Round 3, any statements without consensus were re-presented unmodified, alongside a summary of comments from Round 2. RESULTS Twenty-three radiation oncologists participated in Round 1 and, of these, 21 (91%) and 22 (96%) completed Rounds 2 and 3 respectively. Twenty-nine of 44 statements (66%) achieved consensus in Round 2. The remaining 15 statements (34%) did not achieve further consensus in Round 3. Consensus was achieved for 10 of 17 statements (59%) regarding patient selection/pre-treatment investigations; 12 of 13 statements (92%) concerning treatment planning and delivery; and 7 of 14 statements (50%) relating to OARs. Lack of agreement remained regarding the minimum time interval between irradiation courses, the number/size of pelvic lesions that can be treated and the most appropriate cumulative OAR constraints. CONCLUSIONS This study has established consensus, where possible, in areas of patient selection, pre-treatment investigations, treatment planning and delivery for pelvic SABR re-irradiation for metastatic oligorecurrence and locoregional recurrences. Further research into this technique is required, especially regarding aspects of practice where consensus was not achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finbar Slevin
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK; University of Leeds, UK.
| | - Katharine Aitken
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - Filippo Alongi
- IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar, Italy; University of Brescia, Italy.
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
| | | | - Ah Ram Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | | | - Christopher Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloane Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, USA.
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Italy; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sophia C Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
| | - Rémy Kinj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Italy.
| | - Anand Mahadevan
- Geisinger Medical Center - Radiation Oncology, Danville, USA.
| | - Mariangela Massaccesi
- Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica e Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, Roma, Italy.
| | - Lucas C Mendez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, Canada.
| | | | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; CRIStAL, UMR 9181, Lille University, Lille, France.
| | - Antonio Pontoriero
- Department of BIOMORF, Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Messina, Italy.
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Centre, Cleveland, USA.
| | | | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloane Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, USA.
| | | | | | - Maria A Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biochemical Engineering, University College London, UK.
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK; University of Leeds, UK.
| | - Louise J Murray
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK; University of Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Johnstone P, Okonta L, Aitken K, Holmes J, Harrison M, Harji D, O'Cathail SM, Taylor C, Tsang Y, Wing M, Muirhead R. A multicentre retrospective review of SABR reirradiation in rectal cancer recurrence. Radiother Oncol 2021; 162:1-6. [PMID: 34182013 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is associated with considerable morbidity, poor quality of life and an overall survival of 9 months. The non-operative treatment of LRRC is an understudied area, there is no consensus on management in this setting. We aim to perform a retrospective, multicentre analysis of patients treated with SABR reirradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients were identified who received SABR re-irradiation for LRRC, at 3 UK centres, between August 2015 and September 2020. Eligible patients had pelvic recurrence and were either not suitable/opted not for surgery, or margin positive after exenturative surgery. Patients were treated with 30 Gy in 5 fractions and followed up with clinical review and CT scan at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. RESULTS 69 patients with 81 lesions were identified and median follow up was 28 months. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 12.1 months (10.4, 17.7) and 38.7 months (28.9,-) respectively. 2-year OS was 0.77 (0.66, 0.89). 58.3% of deaths were as a result of consequences of local relapse. 42.6% of patients had local relapse at death or last follow up. CONCLUSION Our outcomes are encouraging for a population who had R1 resections, refused or were refused surgery; as they are similar to those in surgical series. Prospective data including details of survival, local relapse and QOL; with an optimised SABR technique, is required to establish SABR as an alternative to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jane Holmes
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Harrison
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | | | | | | | - Yat Tsang
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Denost Q, Frison E, Salut C, Sitta R, Rullier A, Harji D, Maillou-Martinaud H, Rullier E, Smith D, Vendrely V. A phase III randomized trial evaluating chemotherapy followed by pelvic reirradiation versus chemotherapy alone as preoperative treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer - GRECCAR 15 trial protocol. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1909-1918. [PMID: 33843133 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM Treatment strategies in locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) are complex and need to be balanced against previous treatments received for the primary rectal cancer. Radiotherapy is an important component of treatment in LRRC. However, there is little high-quality evidence on the role of reirradiation in this cohort. Therefore, the aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pelvic reirradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone on the rate of curative surgery (R0) in previously irradiated patients with LRRC. METHOD GRECCAR 15 is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, outcome assessor-blinded, superiority randomized controlled phase III clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pelvic reirradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with LRRC previously irradiated for the primary cancer. Adult patients (>18 years old) with a histologically proven resectable LRRC, who have previously received pelvic radiotherapy for their primary rectal cancer at a dose of 25-50.4 Gy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of <2 will be eligible to participate. The pelvic reirradiation will consist of conformational intensity-modulated external irradiation, delivering a dose of 30.6 Gy with concomitant chemotherapy using capecitabine. The primary outcome of this trial is the R0 resection rate. Overall, GRECCAR 15 aims to recruit 186 patients to detect an absolute difference of 20% in the R0 resection rate with 80% power and 5% two-sided significance level. CONCLUSION The GRECCAR 15 trial is the first, definitive, phase III trial to investigate reirradiation in LRRC. The results of this trial will inform definitively the neoadjuvant treatment strategy in previously irradiated patients and assess whether there is any associated benefit of reirradiation in combination with induction chemotherapy in improving R0 resection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quentin Denost
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | - Eric Frison
- Inserm, CIC1401-EC, Bordeaux, Service D'information Médicale, CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cécile Salut
- Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | - Remy Sitta
- Inserm, CIC1401-EC, Bordeaux, Service D'information Médicale, CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anne Rullier
- Service d'Anatomopathologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | - Deena Harji
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Eric Rullier
- Département de Chirurgie Colorectal, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | - Denis Smith
- Service D'oncologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, CHU, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Slevin F, Thompson CM, Speight R, Murray LJ, Lilley J, Henry AM. Ultra hypofractionated extended nodal irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy for oligorecurrent pelvic nodal prostate cancer. Med Dosim 2021; 46:411-418. [PMID: 34148727 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) may recur after primary treatment but no standard of care exists for patients with pelvic nodal relapse. Based on obervational data, Extended Nodal Irradiation (ENI) might be associated with fewer treatment failures than Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) to the involved node(s) alone. Ultra hypofractionated ENI is yet to be evaluated in this setting, but it could provide a therapeutic advantage if PCa has a low α/β ratio in addition to patient convenience/resource benefits. This volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning study developed a class solution for 5-fraction Extended Nodal Irradiation (ENI) plus a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to involved node(s). Ten patients with oligorecurrent nodal disease after radical prostatectomy/post-operative prostate bed radiotherapy were selected. Three plans were produced for each dataset to deliver 25 Gy in 5 fractions ENI plus SIBs of 40, 35 and 30 Gy. The biologically effective dose (BED) formula was used to determine the remaining dose in 5 fractions that could be delivered to re-irradiated segments of organs at risk (OARs). Tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were calculated using the LQ-Poisson Marsden and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models respectively. Six patients had an OAR positioned within planning target volume node (PTVn), which resulted in reduced target coverage to PTV node in six, five and four instances for 40, 35 and 30 Gy SIB plans respectively. In these instances, only 30 Gy SIB plans had a median PTV coverage >90% (inter-quartile range 90-95). No OAR constraint was exceeded for 30 Gy SIB plans, including where segments of OARs were re-irradiated. Gross tumour volume node (GTVn) median TCP was 95.7% (94.4-96), 90.7% (87.1-91.2) and 78.6% (75.8-81.1) for 40, 35 and 30 Gy SIB plans respectively, where an α/β ratio of 1.5 was assumed. SacralPlex median NTCP was 43.2% (0.7-61.2), 12.1% (0.6-29.7) and 2.5% (0.5-5.1) for 40, 35 and 30 Gy SIB plans respectively. NTCP for Bowel_Small was <0.3% and zero for other OARs for all three plan types. Ultra hypofractionated ENI planning for pelvic nodal relapsed PCa appears feasible with encouraging estimates of nodal TCP and low estimates of NTCP, especially where a low α/β ratio is assumed and a 30 Gy SIB is delivered. This solution should be further evaluated within a clinical trial and compared against SABR to involved node(s) alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finbar Slevin
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
| | | | - Richard Speight
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Louise J Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - John Lilley
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|