Changes in systemic sympathetic nervous system activity after mitral valve surgery and their relationship to changes in left ventricular size and systolic performance in patients with mitral regurgitation

Gene expression and ultra-structural evidence for metabolic derangement in the primary mitral regurgitation heart

Aims

Chronic neurohormonal activation and haemodynamic load cause derangement in the utilization of the myocardial substrate. In this study, we test the hypothesis that the primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) heart shows an altered metabolic gene profile and cardiac ultra-structure consistent with decreased fatty acid and glucose metabolism despite a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 60%.

Methods and results

Metabolic gene expression in right atrial (RA), left atrial (LA), and left ventricular (LV) biopsies from donor hearts (n = 10) and from patients with moderate-to-severe PMR (n = 11) at surgery showed decreased mRNA glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4), GLUT1, and insulin receptor substrate 2 and increased mRNA hexokinase 2, O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase, and O-linked N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase, rate-limiting steps in the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway. Pericardial fluid levels of neuropeptide Y were four-fold higher than simultaneous plasma, indicative of increased sympathetic drive. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy showed glycogen accumulation, glycophagy, increased lipid droplets (LDs), and mitochondrial cristae lysis. These findings are associated with increased mRNA for glycogen synthase kinase 3β, decreased carnitine palmitoyl transferase 2, and fatty acid synthase in PMR vs. normals. Cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography for 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) uptake showed decreased LV [18F]FDG uptake and increased plasma haemoglobin A1C, free fatty acids, and mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns in a separate cohort of patients with stable moderate PMR with an LVEF > 60% (n = 8) vs. normal controls (n = 8).

Conclusion

The PMR heart has a global ultra-structural and metabolic gene expression pattern of decreased glucose uptake along with increased glycogen and LDs. Further studies must determine whether this presentation is an adaptation or maladaptation in the PMR heart in the clinical evaluation of PMR.

Levosimendan in patients with reduced left ventricular function undergoing isolated coronary or valve surgery

OBJECTIVE

In the Levosimendan in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Undergoing Cardiac Surgery Requiring Cardiopulmonary Bypass (LEVO-CTS) trial, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed between levosimendan and placebo in a broad population of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In previous studies, the benefits of levosimendan were most clearly evident in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. In a prespecified analysis of LEVO-CTS, we compared treatment-related outcomes and costs across types of cardiac surgical procedures.

METHODS

Overall, 563 (66.4%) patients underwent isolated CABG, 97 (11.4%) isolated valve, and 188 (22.2%) combined CABG/valve surgery. Outcomes included the co-primary 4-component composite (30-day mortality, 30-day renal replacement, 5-day myocardial infarction, or 5-day mechanical circulatory support), the 2-component composite (30-day mortality or 5-day mechanical circulatory support), 90-day mortality, low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), and 30-day medical costs.

RESULTS

The 4- and 2-component outcomes were not significantly different with levosimendan and placebo in patients undergoing CABG (15.2% vs 19.3% and 7.8% vs 10.4%), valve (49.0% vs 33.3% and 22.4% vs 2.1%), or combined procedures (39.6% vs 35.9% and 24.0% vs 19.6%). Ninety-day mortality was lower with levosimendan in isolated CABG (2.1% vs 7.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.64), but not significantly different in valve (8.3% vs 2.0%; HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 0.46-36.72) or combined procedures (10.4% vs 7.6%; HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.53-3.64; interaction P = .011). LCOS (12.0% vs 22.1%; odds ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.76; interaction P = .118) was significantly lower in levosimendan-treated patients undergoing isolated CABG. Excluding study drug costs, median and mean 30-day costs were $53,707 and $65,852 for levosimendan and $54,636 and $67,122 for placebo, with a 30-day mean difference (levosimendan - placebo) of -$1270 (bootstrap 95% CI, -$8722 to $6165).

CONCLUSIONS

Levosimendan was associated with lower 90-day mortality and LCOS in patients undergoing isolated CABG, but not in those undergoing isolated valve or combined CABG/valve procedures.

The Role of Arterial Hypertension in Mitral Valve Regurgitation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review medical literature for evidence of association between hypertension and mitral regurgitation (MR) and summarize potential favorable effects of antihypertensive drugs on MR natural history and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypertension and MR are common diseases affecting a large proportion of the general population. Contemporary evidence suggests that hypertension may worsen the progression and prognosis of MR through augmented mechanical stress and increased regurgitation volume. Renin-angiotensin axis inhibitors, beta-blockers, and vasodilators have been tested in order to prevent or decrease primary or secondary MR. Although antihypertensive agents may improve hemodynamic parameters and left ventricular remodeling in primary MR, there is no strong evidence of benefit on clinical outcomes. On the other hand, a beneficial effect of these drugs on secondary MR is better established. Moreover, there are no studies evaluating a possible benefit of lower blood pressure targets in MR. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to elucidate the precise role of antihypertensive therapy on treatment of MR.

Targeting the sympatho-adrenergic link in chronic rheumatic mitral regurgitation: assessing the role of oral beta-blockers

INTRODUCTION

Chronic mitral regurgitation (MR) is characterized by adverse ventricular remodeling and progressive LV dysfunction leading to heart failure (HF). Beta-blockers (BB) improve LV remodeling and prognosis in patients with HF. As chronic severe MR results in neuroendocrine activation similar to HF, it is likely that BB may also exert favorable effects in these patients. No study has assessed the role of oral BB therapy in chronic rheumatic MR.

AIMS

A total of 100 patients of chronic rheumatic MR (mean age 30±13.48 years, NYHA 2.2±0.5) were randomized to BB (Metoprolol, 37±13.5 mg, n=48) vs no BB (n=52) in addition to standard therapy.

RESULTS

Baseline BNP and echocardiographic parameters were comparable in the two groups. At 3 months, BB therapy resulted in significantly lower NYHA class (1.97 vs 2.35), BNP (141 vs 207 pg/mL), LV end-systolic (35.89 vs 51.30) and LV end-diastolic volumes (101 vs 128 mL/m(2) ), LV end-systolic stress (81.1 vs 93.3 dyn/cm(2) ), LV mass (122 vs 154 gm/m(2) ), and LV work (737.02 vs 952.82 mm Hg L/min, all P significant). Therapy with BB resulted in a -15.6%, -10.4%,-12.1%, and -7.3% reduction in LV end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions and LVESVi and LVEDVi, respectively. Following BB therapy, BNP levels, end-systolic stress, indexed LV mass, and LV work also reduced significantly by 27.3%, 15.6%, 8.7%, and 28%, respectively. The control group had no significant change. The MR grade reduced from severe to moderate in 11% of those on BB (controls: no change). At 6 months, the BB group had further improvement in all echocardiographic parameters ranging from +9.1 to -18.2%.

CONCLUSION

In this first study of BB in rheumatic MR, targeting the sympatho-adrenergic axis exerted favorable effects on NYHA class, LV volumes, LV end-systolic stress, and LV work. Further studies are required to elucidate the role of BB in rheumatic MR.

Sympathetic Activity in Patients With Secondary Symptomatic Mitral Regurgitation or End-Stage Systolic Heart Failure

OBJECTIVES

This study shows the impact of secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) and transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) with the MitraClip system on sympathetic nerve activity (SNA).

BACKGROUND

An increase in SNA is associated with worse outcomes and limited survival in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

METHODS

Twenty CHF-patients without relevant sMR and 30 CHF patients with symptomatic sMR were enrolled prospectively. All patients underwent standardized laboratory testing and microneurography. Sixteen patients from the sMR group underwent the MitraClip procedure; 10 patients after TMVR and 9 untreated sMR patients completed 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Comparing groups according to presence of sMR, we found no differences in left ventricular dimensions, and serum levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and noradrenaline; sMR was associated with increased MSNA (106 ± 60 burst/min vs. 74 ± 48 burst/min, d = 0.58), an impaired sympathetic baroreflex gain (10 ± 7 burst/mm Hg vs. 5 ± 5 burst/mm Hg, d = 0.61), and a higher heart rate (90 ± 27/beats/min vs. 78 ± 12/beats/min, d = 0.58). TMVR led to improved New York Heart Association functional class (d > 0.05), reduced levels of NT-proBNP (5,251 ± 3,760 pg/ml vs. 3,710 ± 2,464 pg/ml; d = 0.58) improvement in 6-minute walk test (204 ± 33 m vs. 288 ± 45 m, d = 0.64), but unchanged levels of noradrenaline. TMVR decreased MSNA burst-frequency (130 ± 78 bursts/min vs. 74 ± 21 bursts/min; d = 0.58) and baroreflex gain (7 ± 4 burst/mm Hg vs. 4 ± 1 burst/mm Hg; d = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CHF, concomitant sMR is associated with increased sympathetic nerve activity, which was independent from measured levels of NT-proBNP, noradrenaline, and left ventricular dimensions. Reduction of sMR with the MitraClip procedure reduced SNA and improved baroreflex gain, in line with improvements of functional capacity.

Left ventricular remodeling early after correction of mitral regurgitation: maintenance of stroke volume with decreased systolic indexes

OBJECTIVE

Mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation is followed by left ventricle adjustment to new preload and afterload. We evaluated left ventricular geometry and function immediately after mitral valve repair for degenerative prolapse.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 25 patients undergoing mitral valve repair; 15 patients undergoing a coronary artery bypass graft served as controls to determine the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest on left ventricular function. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was conducted after sternotomy before initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass and after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass and protamine infusion. Simultaneous pulmonary catheter data ensured that the images were obtained under similar hemodynamic conditions.

RESULTS

Immediately after mitral valve repair, left ventricular fractional area change decreased significantly from 65% ± 7% to 52% ± 8% (P < .001). Left ventricular end-diastolic area decreased minimally (21.3 ± 5.3 cm(2) vs 19.4 ± 4.5 cm(2); P = .005), whereas left ventricular end-systolic area increased significantly (7.5 ± 2.3 cm(2) vs 9.3 ± 2.5 cm(2); P < .001). Notably, forward stroke volume (thermodilution) remained similar (63 ± 24 mL vs 66 ± 19 mL; P = .5). No significant difference was found in controls between pre- cardiopulmonary bypass and post-cardiopulmonary bypass fractional area change (54% ± 12% vs 57% ± 10%; P = .19), left ventricular end-diastolic area (16.6 ± 6.2 cm(2) vs 15.7 ± 5.0 cm(2); P = .32), and stroke volume (72 ± 29 mL vs 65 ± 19 mL; P = .15); they had a slight decrease in left ventricular end-systolic area (7.9 ± 4.4 cm(2) vs 6.9 ± 3.2 cm(2); P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Early after correction of mitral regurgitation, left ventricular fractional area change decreases significantly, primarily as the result of a larger end-systolic dimension. This may be a compensatory mechanism to prevent augmentation of forward stroke volume after mitral valve repair.