Achieving greater reductions in cardiovascular risk: lessons from statin therapy on risk measures and risk reduction

Association of cytochromes P450 3A4*22 and 3A5*3 genotypes and polymorphism with response to simvastatin in hypercholesterolemia patients

BACKGROUNDS

Inter-individual variability in response to statin was mainly due to genetic differences. This study aimed to investigate the association of CYP3A4*22 (rs35599367), CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with response to simvastatin in hypercholesterolemia patients conducted at King Abdulaziz University hospital (KAUH) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 274 participants were registered in the current study. Hypercholesterolemic patients taking simvastatin 20 mg (n = 148) and control subjects (n = 126) were tested for rs35599367 and rs776746 genotypes using Custom Taqman ® Assay Probes. Response to simvastatin in these patients was assessed by determination of low density lipoprotein (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC) and by measuring statin plasma levels using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS).

RESULTS

None of the participants carried a homozygous CYP3A4*22 mutant genotype, while 12 (4.4%) individuals had a heterozygous genotype and 262 (95.6%) had a wild homozygous genotype. The CYP3A5*3 allele was detected in the homozygous mutant form in 16 (5.8%) individuals, while 74 (27.0%) individuals carried the heterozygous genotype and 184 (67.2%) carried the wildtype homozygous genotype. Of the patient group, 15 (11%) were classified as intermediate metabolizers (IMs) and 133 (89%) as extensive metabolizers (EMs). Plasma simvastatin concentrations for the combined CYP3A4/5 genotypes were significantly (P<0.05) higher in the IMs group than in the EMs group. TC and plasma LDL-C levels were also significantly (P<0.05) higher in IMs than in EMs.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed associations between CYP3A4*22 (rs35599367) and CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) SNP combination genotypes with response to statins in hypercholesterolemia. Patients who had either a mutant homozygous allele for CYP3A5*3 or mutant homozygous and heterozygous alleles for CYP3A4*22 showed increased response to lower TC and LDL-C levels.

Non-response to (statin) therapy: the importance of distinguishing non-responders from non-adherers in pharmacogenetic studies

PURPOSE

In pharmacogenetic research, genetic variation in non-responders and high responders is compared with the aim to identify the genetic loci responsible for this variation in response. However, an important question is whether the non-responders are truly biologically non-responsive or actually non-adherent? Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe, within the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER), characteristics of both non-responders and high responders of statin treatment in order to possibly discriminate non-responders from non-adherers.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics of non-responders to statin therapy (≤10 % LDL-C reduction) were compared with those of high responders (>40 % LDL-C reduction) through a linear regression analysis. In addition, pharmacogenetic candidate gene analysis was performed to show the effect of excluding non-responders from the analysis.

RESULTS

Non-responders to statin therapy were younger (p = 0.001), more often smoked (p < 0.001), had a higher alcohol consumption (p < 0.001), had lower LDL cholesterol levels (p < 0.001), had a lower prevalence of hypertension (p < 0.001), and had lower cognitive function (p = 0.035) compared to subjects who highly responded to pravastatin treatment. Moreover, excluding non-responders from pharmacogenetic studies yielded more robust results, as standard errors decreased.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that non-responders to statin therapy are more likely to actually be non-adherers, since they have more characteristics that are viewed as indicators of high self-perceived health and low disease awareness, possibly making the subjects less adherent to study medication. We suggest that in pharmacogenetic research, extreme non-responders should be excluded to overcome the problem that non-adherence is investigated instead of non-responsiveness.

In search for genetic determinants of clinically meaningful differential cardiovascular event reduction by pravastatin in the PHArmacogenetic study of Statins in the Elderly at risk (PHASE)/PROSPER study

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy is widely used in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular events and is associated with significant risk reductions. However, there is considerable variation in response to statin therapy both in terms of LDL cholesterol reduction and clinical outcomes. It has been hypothesized that genetic variation contributes importantly to this individual drug response.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated the interaction between genetic variants and pravastatin or placebo therapy on the incidence of cardiovascular events by performing a genome-wide association study in the participants of the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk for vascular disease--PHArmacogenetic study of Statins in the Elderly at risk (PROSPER/PHASE) study (n = 5244). We did not observe genome-wide significant associations with a clinically meaningful differential cardiovascular event reduction by pravastatin therapy. In addition, SNPs with p-values lower than 1 × 10(-4) were assessed for replication in a case-only analysis within two randomized placebo controlled pravastatin trials, CARE (n = 711) and WOSCOPS (n = 522). rs7102569, on chromosome 11 near the ODZ4 gene, was replicated in the CARE study (p = 0.008), however the direction of effect was opposite. This SNP was not associated in WOSCOPS. In addition, none of the SNPs replicated significantly after correcting for multiple testing.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not identify genetic variation that was significantly associated at genome-wide level with a clinically meaningful differential event reduction by pravastatin treatment in a large prospective study. We therefore assume that in daily practice the use of genetic characteristics to personalize pravastatin treatment to improve prevention of cardiovascular disease will be limited.

Pharmacogenetics of statins: achievements, whole-genome analyses and future perspectives

Statins are the most commonly prescribed class of drug worldwide and therapy is highly effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and cardiovascular events. However, there is large variability in clinical response to statin treatment. Recent research provides evidence that genetic variation contributes to this variable response to statin treatment. Until recently, pharmacogenetic studies have used mainly candidate gene approaches to investigate these effects. Since candidate gene studies explain only a small part of the observed variation and results have often been inconsistent, genome-wide association (GWA) studies may be a better approach. In this paper the most important candidate gene studies and the first published GWA studies assessing statin response are discussed. Moreover, we describe the PHASE study, an EU-funded GWA study that will investigate the genetic variation responsible for the variation in response to pravastatin in a large randomized clinical trial.

Pharmacogenomics of adverse drug reactions: implementing personalized medicine

Pharmacogenomics aims to investigate the genetic basis of inter-individual differences in drug responses, such as efficacy, dose requirements and adverse events. Research in pharmacogenomics has grown over the past decade, evolving from a candidate-gene approach to genome-wide association studies (GWASs). Genetic variants in genes coding for drug metabolism, drug transport and more recently human-leukocyte antigens (HLAs) have been linked to inter-individual differences in the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The tight association of specific HLA alleles with Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug hypersensitivity syndrome and drug-induced liver injury underscore the importance of HLA in the pathogenesis of these idiosyncratic drug hypersensitivity reactions. However, as with the search for the genetic basis for common diseases, pharmacogenomic research, including GWAS, has so far been a disappointment in discovering major gene variants responsible for the efficacy of drugs used to treat common diseases. This review focuses on the pharmacogenomics of ADRs, the underlying mechanisms and the potential use of genomic biomarkers in clinical practice for dose adjustment and the avoidance of drug toxicity. We also discuss obstacles to the implementation of pharmacogenomics and the direction of future translational research.

Apolipoprotein B and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are better risk markers for coronary artery disease than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in hypertriglyceridemic metabolic syndrome patients

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome is highly prevalent in the general population. Small dense low-density lipoprotein (sd-LDL) particles have been considered as a risk marker in metabolic syndrome diagnosis. Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) concentration reflects the number of LDL particles and is closely associated with atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to compare the associations of ApoB, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (NHDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with metabolic syndrome and its relationship with significant coronary stenosis (SCS) in a Tunisian population.

METHODS

We enrolled 192 patients, who underwent coronary angiography. The body mass index, blood lipids, fasting glucose, insulin concentration, and blood pressure of every patient were measured. Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria.

RESULTS

The frequency of metabolic syndrome was 58.3%. The comparison of the lipidic parameters between subject with and without metabolic syndrome showed a significant increase in ApoB and NHDL-C but not in LDL-C. By considering triglyceride (TG) limits (TG ≤ 0.9 mmol/L and TG > 1.70 mmol/L), we noted no differences in ApoB, NHDL-C, and LDL-C between subjects with and without metabolic syndrome in triglyceridemia ≤0.9 mmol/L. In triglyceridemia >1.70 mmol/L, a significant increase in ApoB and NHDL-C, but not in LDL-C, was noted. These results seem to consolidate the probability of increased sd-LDL in hypertriglyceridemic metabolic syndrome subjects. Indeed, in our study the odds ratio (OR) of SCS associated with metabolic syndrome is 3.81 (P = 0.007) in the studied population. This risk increases to 8.70 (P = 0.026) in hypertriglyceridemic subjects and seems to be associated with ApoB and NHDL-C (OR = 1.87, P = 0.038; OR = 1.26, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that ApoB and NHDL-C seem to be more correlated to SCS in metabolic syndrome with hypertriglyceridemia than LDL-C.

Effective management of dyslipidaemia among patients with cardiovascular risk: updated recommendations on identification and follow-up

The identification of modifiable risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) and therapies for their management has led to the development of many national and international guidelines. However, despite the general acceptance and use of such guidelines, CHD, the principal manifestation of cardiovascular disease (CVD), remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with dyslipidaemia one of the most important modifiable risk factors. Many patients remain unidentified and untreated or, if receiving treatment, do not reach guideline targets. All guidelines recommend screening strategies for identifying at-risk patients and assessment. Lifestyle changes are the basis of any treatment strategy, with patients often requiring behavioural counselling. Those unable to achieve or maintain adequate risk reduction on lifestyle changes alone, and high-risk patients, also require pharmacotherapy. Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains an important goal of pharmacotherapy, although some patients, particularly those with diabetes, may need to reduce triglycerides and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Statins are the first-choice agents for LDL-C reduction. However, optimal dosage is important. Many patients fail to adhere to therapy, and primary care physicians are best placed to instigate adherence-enhancing strategies, which may ultimately reduce mortality and morbidity. This clinical review highlights the problems in current CHD risk management and summarises the updated evidence base within clinical recommendations to effectively manage at-risk patients.

Apolipoprotein-B, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the long-term risk of coronary heart disease in men

We examined whether plasma apolipoprotein-B (apo-B) levels add further information on the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) after taking into account low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations and other traditional risk factors. Among 2,072 CHD-free men from the Québec Cardiovascular Study at entry and followed for 13 years, 230 had a first CHD event (CHD death or nonfatal myocardial infarction). Increased apo-B (tertile 1 vs 3) levels were associated with a significant increased risk of CHD after adjustment for nonlipid and lipid risk factors other than LDL cholesterol levels (relative risk 1.89, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 2.73). High plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations (tertile 1 vs 3) were also associated with an increased risk of CHD independently of nonlipid and lipid risk factors (relative risk 2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.44 to 2.84). However, apo-B levels modulated to a significant extent the risk of CHD associated with increased concentrations of LDL cholesterol (>/=4.3 mmol/L). For instance, among men with high LDL cholesterol levels, those with an apo-B level <128 mg/dl were not at increased risk for CHD (relative risk 1.53, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 2.62). In contrast, high levels of apo-B and LDL cholesterol were associated with a significant twofold increased risk of CHD (p <0.001). Receiver-operating curve analysis also indicated that plasma apo-B levels improved the ability to discriminate incident CHD cases among patients with high LDL cholesterol levels compared with a model based on LDL cholesterol levels (p = 0.04). In conclusion, plasma apo-B levels modulated the risk of CHD associated with LDL cholesterol over a 13-year follow-up.

Significance of small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations in relation to the severity of coronary heart diseases

We have investigated the clinical significance of small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (sd-LDL-C) concentrations in coronary heart disease (CHD). We measured the LDL size by gradient gel electrophoresis and quantified sd-LDL-C concentrations by a newly developed rapid assay using heparin-magnesium precipitation in 225 consecutive CHD patients without any lipid-lowering medication and 142 healthy middle-aged subjects as controls. The LDL size was markedly smaller and sd-LDL-C levels were significantly higher in CHD patients than in controls of both sexes, whereas LDL-C levels were comparable between CHD and controls. The LDL-C levels were significantly higher in a subpopulation of 84 patients with acute coronary syndrome than in other patients groups, while LDL size and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) were not found to vary among the patients. The sd-LDL-C increased as the number of diseased vessels or Gensini atherosclerosis score increased. Among the 123 stable CHD patients, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that sd-LDL-C levels were significantly associated with the clinically severe cases requiring coronary revascularization independently of LDL-C, HDL-C and apolipoprotein B. The sd-LDL mass plays a more important role in the progression of CHD than the LDL size, and the sd-LDL-C concentration serves as a powerful surrogate marker for the prevention of CHD.

Rationale for targeting multiple lipid pathways for optimal cardiovascular risk reduction

Clinical trials of statin therapy have consistently demonstrated significant reductions in coronary artery disease (CAD) events, yet statin-treated patients remain at risk for CAD despite substantial reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Recent evidence from clinical trials supports reduction of LDL cholesterol to lower targets, and the updated treatment guidelines include optional, more aggressive LDL cholesterol goals for patients at very high and moderately high risk. Achievement of these lower goals will require enhanced treatment strategies. Targeting multiple lipid pathways can provide greater reductions in LDL cholesterol as well as improvements in other lipid parameters. Clinical trials are needed to determine which treatment strategies provide optimal cardiovascular risk reduction.

Evaluating Cardiovascular Pathophysiology and Anatomy in Atherosclerosis

The process of atherosclerosis begins with endothelial dysfunction from impaired bioavailability of NO and progresses through multiple stages of plaque development. Impaired endothelial function decreases NO and increases oxidized macromolecules such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol accumulates in subendothelial space, forming plaques that may eventually compromise the lumen. Acute coronary events result from plaque rupture and consequent thrombus formation and abrupt occlusion of the vessel lumen. New diagnostic methods such as flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery can detect endothelial dysfunction, and intravascular ultrasound can detect early plaque formation in the arterial wall. These techniques may provide a means to identify patients at risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes, thereby enabling physicians to potentially prevent adverse events by early initiation of lipid-lowering therapy.