Extremely obese patients treated with venovenous ECMO--an intensivist's challenge

Morbid obesity's impact on COVID-19 patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: The covid-19 critical care consortium database review

Introduction: Obesity is associated with a worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Veno-venous (V-V) Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) can be a rescue option, however, the direct impact of morbid obesity in this select group of patients remains unclear.Methods: This is an observational study of critically ill adults with COVID-19 and ARDS supported by V-V ECMO. Data are from 82 institutions participating in the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium international registry. Patients were admitted between 12 January 2020 to 27 April 2021. They were stratified based on Body Mass Index (BMI) at 40 kg/m2. The endpoint was survival to hospital discharge.Results: Complete data available on 354 of 401 patients supported on V-V ECMO. The characteristics of the high BMI (>40 kg/m2) and lower BMI (≤40 kg/m2) groups were statistically similar. However, the 'high BMI' group were comparatively younger and had a lower APACHE II score. Using survival analysis, older age (Hazard Ratio, HR 1.49 per-10-years, CI 1.25-1.79) and higher BMI (HR 1.15 per-5 kg/m2 increase, CI 1.03-1.28) were associated with a decreased patient survival. A safe BMI threshold above which V-V ECMO would be prohibitive was not apparent and instead, the risk of an adverse outcome increased linearly with BMI.Conclusion: In COVID-19 patients with severe ARDS who require V-V ECMO, there is an increased risk of death associated with age and BMI. The risk is linear and there is no BMI threshold beyond which the risk for death greatly increases.

Outcomes in Obese Adult Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review

Obesity is associated with an overall increased risk of morbidity and mortality. However, in patients with critical illness, sepsis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome, obesity may be protective, termed "the obesity paradox." This is a systematic literature review of articles published from 2000 to 2022 evaluating complications and mortality in adults with respiratory failure on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) based on body mass index (BMI). Eighteen studies with 517 patients were included. Common complications included acute renal failure (175/377, 46.4%), venous thrombosis (175/293, 59.7%), and bleeding (28/293, 9.6%). Of the six cohort studies, two showed improved mortality among obese patients, two showed a trend toward improved mortality, and two showed no difference. Comparing all patients in the studies with BMI of less than 30 to those with BMI of greater than or equal to 30, we noted decreased mortality with obesity (92, 37.1% of BMI <30 vs. 30, 11% of BMI ≥30, p ≤ 0.0001). Obesity may be protective against mortality in adult patients undergoing VV ECMO. Morbid and super morbid obesity should not be considered a contraindication to cannulation, with patients with BMI ≥ 80 surviving to discharge. Complications may be high, however, with higher rates of continuous renal replacement therapy and thrombosis among obese patients.

Obesity and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Analysis of Outcomes

Traditionally, patients with obesity have been deemed ineligible for extracorporeal life support (ELS) therapies such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), given the association of obesity with chronic health conditions that contribute to increased morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, a growing body of literature suggests the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of ECMO in the obese population. This review provides an in-depth analysis of the current literature assessing the effects of obesity on outcomes among patients supported with ECMO (venovenous [VV] ECMO in noncoronavirus disease 2019 and coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory distress syndrome, venoarterial [VA] ECMO, and combined VV and VA ECMO), offer a possible explanation of the current findings on the basis of the obesity paradox phenomenon, provides a framework for future studies addressing the use of ELS therapies in the obese patient population, and provides guidance from the literature for many of the challenges related to initiating, maintaining, and weaning ELS therapy in patients with obesity.

Association Between Body Mass Index and Outcomes in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

BACKGROUND

The association between obesity, or elevated body mass index (BMI), and outcomes in patients receiving venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has not been well established. Recent studies in patients receiving venovenous ECMO did not detect an association between obesity and increased mortality. The purpose of this retrospective observational study is to evaluate the association between BMI and survival in patients receiving VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock.

METHODS

All patients >18 years of age supported on VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock in a single academic center between 2009 and 2019 were included. ECMO outcomes, including successful ECMO decannulation and 30-day survival, were analyzed after stratification according to BMI. Multivariable and univariate logistic regression were used to assess the association between BMI and VA-ECMO outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the total patients (n = 355) cannulated for VA-ECMO, 61.7% of the patients survived to ECMO recovery/decannulation, 45.5% of the patients survived to 30 days after ECMO decannulation, and 38.9% of the patients survived to hospital discharge with no statistically significant differences among the BMI groups. Multivariable logistic regression did not reveal any associations between obesity as defined by BMI and survival to ECMO decannulation (odds ratio [OR] 1.07 per 5 unit increase in BMI, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.33; P = .57), 30-day survival (OR = 0.91, 95% CI, 0.73-1.14; P = .41) or survival to hospital discharge (OR = 0.95, 95% CI, 0.75-1.20; P = .66).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite potential challenges to cannulation and maintaining adequate flow during ECMO, this single centered, retrospective observational study did not detect association between BMI and survival to ECMO decannulation, 30-day survival, or survival to hospital discharge for patients requiring VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock. These data suggest that obesity alone should not exclude candidacy for VA-ECMO. The primary outcome in this retrospective study was survival of the ECMO therapy (survival to ECMO decannulation), defined as surviving >24 hours after decannulation without a withdrawal of care. Secondary outcomes included survival at 30 days and survival to hospital discharge.

The effect of patient obesity on extracorporeal membrane oxygenator outcomes and ventilator dependency

OBJECTIVE

The effect of body habitus for patients who require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support has not been well-studied and may provide insight into patient survival and outcomes. We sought to determine if there is a correlation of body mass index (BMI) with ECMO outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who required any form of ECMO support at our institution between 2012 and 2016. Time variables (overall hospital length of stay, intensive care, and ventilator days), and outcomes variables (ability to wean from ECMO, extubation status, hospital survival, 30-day survival) were studied. Patients were divided into cohorts based on BMI. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Spearman correlation, Fisher's exact test, and independent t-test were used to assess associations.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients required ECMO with a mean BMI of 29 (±6.47; BMI range, 17.6-57.9). The mean BMI did not differ based on type of support provided (veno-veno ECMO [VV] vs veno-arterial [VA]). There was no difference between BMI cohorts for length of stay, time in the intensive care unit (ICU), ability to wean from ECMO, hospital survival or 30-day survival. Raw BMI did not predict if or when patients were extubated.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither obesity classification nor BMI as a continuous variable affected any of the outcome variables. Respiratory outcomes including the ability to extubate and to remain ventilator-free were also independent of patient BMI. These data suggest that extremes of body habitus alone should not be used as an exclusion criteria for consideration of ECMO support.

[Extreme obesity-particular aspect of invasive and noninvasive ventilation]

The obesity rate is increasing worldwide and the percentage of obese patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is rising concomitantly. Ventilatory support strategies in obese patients must take into account the altered pathophysiological conditions. Unfortunately, prospective randomized multicenter trials on this subject are lacking. Therefore, current strategies are based on the individual experiences of ICU physicians and single-center studies. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure and obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) is an efficient treatment option and should be provided as early as possible is an effort to avoid intubation. Patient positioning is also crucial: half-sitting positions (>45°) improve lung compliance and functional residual capacity in patients with respiratory failure. Transpulmonary pressure measurements or the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Network tables may help to adjust the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The tidal volume should be adapted to the ideal and not the actual bodyweight (V_t = 6 ml/kg of ideal bodyweight) to avoid lung damage and (additional) right ventricular stress. Under particular conditions, inspiratory pressures >30 cmH₂O may be tolerated for a limited duration. Early tracheostomy combined with termination/reduction of sedation and relaxation is controversy discussed in the literature as a therapeutic option during invasive ventilation of morbidly obese patients. However, data on early tracheotomy in obese respiratory failure patients are rare and this should be regarded as an individual treatment attempt only. In cases of refractory lung failure, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) is an option despite anatomic changes in morbid obesity.

Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Treatment for Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome

The mortality rate for respiratory failure resulting from obesity hypoventilation syndrome is high if it requires ventilator management. We describe a case of severe acute respiratory failure resulting from obesity hypoventilation syndrome (BMI, 60.2 kg/m²) successfully treated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). During ECMO management, a mucus plug was removed by bronchoscopy daily and 18 L of water was removed using diuretics, resulting in weight loss of 24 kg. The patient was weaned from ECMO on day 5, extubated on day 16, and discharged on day 21. The fundamental treatment for obesity hypoventilation syndrome in morbidly obese patients is weight loss. VV-ECMO can be used for respiratory support until weight loss has been achieved.

Management of obese patients with respiratory failure - A practical approach to a health care issue of increasing significance

In the general population, prevalence of obesity is increasing continuously. Concomitantly, a growing number of obese patients with severe illnesses presents at intensive care units (ICU). Particularly respiratory management of this patient group poses a challenge to intensive care physicians because of differences in respiratory anatomy and physiology in obese compared to non-obese individuals. Aim of this review is to present treatment options for critically ill obese patients requiring mechanical ventilation based on current studies concerning patient positioning, ventilatory regimen as well as extended therapy with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The ideal concept for respiratory management depends on multiple aspects and has to be determined individually. Knowledge of altered respiratory anatomy and physiology in obese patients and possible treatment options may facilitate respiratory management in this patient group.