1
|
Koerber DM, Katz JN, Bohula E, Park JG, Dodson MW, Gerber DA, Hillerson D, Liu S, Pierce MJ, Prasad R, Rose SW, Sanchez PA, Shaw J, Wang J, Jentzer JC, Kristin Newby L, Daniels LB, Morrow DA, van Diepen S. Variation in risk-adjusted cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) length of stay and the association with in-hospital mortality: An analysis from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry. Am Heart J 2024; 271:28-37. [PMID: 38369218 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have suggested that there is wide variability in cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) length of stay (LOS); however, these studies are limited by the absence of detailed risk assessment at the time of admission. Thus, we evaluated inter-hospital differences in CICU LOS, and the association between LOS and in-hospital mortality. METHODS Using data from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry, we included 22,862 admissions between 2017 and 2022 from 35 primarily tertiary and quaternary CICUs that captured consecutive admissions in annual 2-month snapshots. The primary analysis compared inter-hospital differences in CICU LOS, as well as the association between CICU LOS and all-cause in-hospital mortality using a Fine and Gray competing risk model. RESULTS The overall median CICU LOS was 2.2 (1.1-4.8) days, and the median hospital LOS was 5.9 (2.8-12.3) days. Admissions in the longest tertile of LOS tended to be younger with higher rates of pre-existing comorbidities, and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, as well as higher rates of mechanical ventilation, intravenous vasopressor use, mechanical circulatory support, and renal replacement therapy. Unadjusted all-cause in-hospital mortality was 9.3%, 6.7%, and 13.4% in the lowest, intermediate, and highest CICU LOS tertiles. In a competing risk analysis, individual patient CICU LOS was correlated (r2 = 0.31) with a higher risk of 30-day in-hospital mortality. The relationship remained significant in admissions with heart failure, ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS In a large registry of academic CICUs, we observed significant variation in CICU LOS and report that LOS is independently associated with all-cause in-hospital mortality. These findings could potentially be used to improve CICU resource utilization planning and refine risk prognostication in critically ill cardiovascular patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Koerber
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Erin Bohula
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeong-Gun Park
- TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark W Dodson
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT
| | - Daniel A Gerber
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Dustin Hillerson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | - Shuangbo Liu
- Max Rady College of Medicine, St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Matthew J Pierce
- North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | | | - Scott W Rose
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Pablo A Sanchez
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Jeffrey Shaw
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - L Kristin Newby
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
| | - Lori B Daniels
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parry I, Bell J. Associations between burn care services and impairment at discharge after burn injury: Analysis of the Global Burn Registry. Burns 2024; 50:813-822. [PMID: 38503574 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Throughout the world, burn injury is a major cause of death and disability. In resource-limited countries, burn injury is one of the leading causes of permanent disability among children who survive traumatic injuries, and burn injury is the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide. This study applied Andersen's model of health care access to evaluate if patient characteristics (predisposing factors), burn care service availability (enabling factors) and injury characteristics (need) are associated with physical impairment at hospital discharge for patients surviving burn injuries globally. Specifically, access to rehabilitation, nutrition, operating theatre, specialized burn unit services, and critical care were investigated as enabling factors. The secondary aim was to determine whether associations between burn care service availability and impairment differed by country income level. METHODS This is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from the World Health Organization, Global Burn Registry. The outcome of interest was physical impairment at discharge. Simple and multivariable logistic regressions were used to test the unadjusted and adjusted associations between the availability of burn care services and impairment at hospital discharge, controlling for patient and injury characteristics. Effect modification was analyzed with service by country income level interaction terms added to the models and, if significant, the models were stratified by income. RESULTS The sample included 6622 patients from 20 countries, with 11.2% classified with physical impairment at discharge. In the fully adjusted model, patients had 89% lower odds impairment at discharge if the treatment facility provided reliable rehabilitation services compared to providing limited or no rehabilitation services (OR.11, 95%CI.08,.16, p < .01). However, this effect was modified by county income with the strong and significant association only present in high/upper middle-income countries. Sophisticated nutritional services were also significantly associated with less impairment in high/upper middle-income countries (OR=.04, 95% CI 0.203, 0.05, p < .01), but significantly more impairment in lower middle/low-income countries (OR=2.01, 95% CI 1.50, 2.69, p < .01). Patients had 444% greater odds of impairment if treated at a center with specialty burn unit services (OR 5.44, 95%CI 3.71, 7.99, p < .01), possibly due to a selection effect. DISCUSSION Access to reliable rehabilitation services and sophisticated nutritional services were strongly associated with less physical impairment at discharge, but only in resource-rich countries. Although these findings support the importance of rehabilitation and nutrition after burn injury, they also highlight potential disparities in the quantity or quality of services available to burn survivors in poorer countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Parry
- University of California, Davis, School of Nursing and Health Care Leadership, California, USA.
| | - Janice Bell
- University of California, Davis, School of Nursing and Health Care Leadership, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Horon I. Characteristics of Mothers Admitted to Intensive Care Units During Hospitalization for Delivery of a Live-born Infant: United States, 2020-2022. NCHS Data Brief 2023:1-7. [PMID: 38085529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Although admission of a mother to an intensive care unit (ICU) during hospitalization for delivery is a relatively rare event, rates of mortality and severe morbidity are high for both mother and child when ICU care is necessary (1-4). Studies on maternal ICU admissions have generally focused on medical diagnoses related to admission, and most have been conducted using international data or data for a hospital or group of hospitals (4-10). Information on demographic characteristics of mothers admitted to ICUs is lacking at the national level. This report describes ICU admissions overall and by race and Hispanic origin, maternal age, live birth order, and plurality for mothers delivering live-born infants in the United States in 2020-2022.
Collapse
|
4
|
Norredam M, Islamoska S, Petersen JH, Benfield T. COVID-19 mortality and use of intensive care among ethnic minorities - a national register-based Danish population study. Eur J Epidemiol 2023; 38:891-899. [PMID: 37191830 PMCID: PMC10185928 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-023-00991-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Migrants and ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic compared to the majority population. Therefore, we studied mortality and use of mechanical ventilation (MV) by country of birth and migrant status in a nationwide cohort in Denmark. Nationwide register data on all cases hospitalized for > 24-hours with COVID-19 between February 2020 and March 2021. Main outcome measures were mortality and MV within 30 days of hospitalization for COVID-19. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated by region of origin and migrant status using logistic regression analyses, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity and sociodemographic factors. Of 6,406 patients, 977 (15%) died and 342 (5%) were treated with mechanical ventilation. Immigrants (OR:0.55;95%CI: 0.44-0.70) and individuals of non-Western origin had a lower odds (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37-0.65) of death upon admission with COVID-19 compared to Danish born individuals. Immigrants and descendants (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.22-2.15) as well as individuals of non-Western origin (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.35-2.47) had a significantly higher odds of MV compared to Danish born individuals. Outcomes of individuals with Western origin did not differ. Immigrants and individuals of non-Western origin had a significantly lower COVID-19 associated mortality compared to individuals of Danish origin after adjustment for sociodemographic factors and comorbidity. In contrast, the odds of MV was higher for immigrants and individuals of non-Western origin compared to individuals of Danish origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Norredam
- Danish Research Centre for Migration, Ethnicity and Health, Section of Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
| | - Sabrina Islamoska
- Danish Research Centre for Migration, Ethnicity and Health, Section of Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Holm Petersen
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark
| | - Thomas Benfield
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bardes JM, Price BS, Adjeroh DA, Doretto G, Wilson A. Emergency medical services shock index is the most accurate predictor of patient outcomes after blunt torso trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 92:499-503. [PMID: 35196303 PMCID: PMC8887781 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shock index (SI) and delta shock index (∆SI) predict mortality and blood transfusion in trauma patients. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of SI and ∆SI in a rural environment with prolonged transport times and transfers from critical access hospitals or level IV trauma centers. METHODS We completed a retrospective database review at an American College of Surgeons verified level 1 trauma center for 2 years. Adult subjects analyzed sustained torso trauma. Subjects with missing data or severe head trauma were excluded. For analysis, poisson regression and binomial logistic regression were used to study the effect of time in transport and SI/∆SI on resource utilization and outcomes. p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Complete data were available on 549 scene patients and 127 transfers. Mean Injury Severity Score was 11 (interquartile range, 9.0) for scene and 13 (interquartile range, 6.5) for transfers. Initial emergency medical services SI was the most significant predictor for blood transfusion and intensive care unit care in both scene and transferred patients (p < 0.0001) compared with trauma center arrival SI or transferring center SI. A negative ∆SI was significantly associated with the need for transfusion and the number of units transfused. Longer transport time also had a significant relationship with increasing intensive care unit length of stay. Cohorts were analyzed separately. CONCLUSION Providers must maintain a high level of clinical suspicion for patients who had an initially elevated SI. Emergency medical services SI was the greatest predictor of injury and need for resources. Enroute SI and ∆SI were less predictive as time from injury increased. This highlights the improvements in en route care but does not eliminate the need for high-level trauma intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Bardes
- From the Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (J.M.B., A.W.), Department of Management Information Systems (B.S.P.), John Chambers College of Business and Economics, and Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering (D.A.A., G.D.), Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The association of the COVID-19 pandemic with the quality of ambulatory care is unknown. Hospitalizations for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are a well-studied measure of the quality of ambulatory care; however, they may also be associated with other patient-level and system-level factors. OBJECTIVE To describe trends in hospital admissions for ACSCs in the prepandemic period (March 2019 to February 2020) compared with the pandemic period (March 2020 to February 2021). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study of adults enrolled in a commercial health maintenance organization in Michigan included 1 240 409 unique adults (13 011 176 person-months) in the prepandemic period and 1 206 361 unique adults (12 759 675 person-months) in the pandemic period. EXPOSURE COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 to February 2021). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Adjusted relative risk (aRR) of ACSC hospitalizations and intensive care unit stays for ACSC hospitalizations and adjusted incidence rate ratio of the length of stay of ACSC hospitalizations in the prepandemic (March 2019 to February 2020) vs pandemic (March 2020 to February 2021) periods, adjusted for patient age, sex, calendar month of admission, and county of residence. RESULTS The study population included 1 240 409 unique adults (13 011 176 person-months) in the prepandemic period and 1 206 361 unique adults (12 759 675 person-months) in the pandemic period, in which 51.3% of person-months (n = 6 547 231) were for female patients, with a relatively even age distribution between the ages of 24 and 64 years. The relative risk of having any ACSC hospitalization in the pandemic period compared with the prepandemic period was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.76; P < .001). This decrease in risk was slightly larger in magnitude than the overall reduction in non-ACSC, non-COVID-19 hospitalization rates (aRR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.81-0.83; P < .001). Large reductions were found in the relative risk of respiratory-related ACSC hospitalizations (aRR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.50-0.58; P < .001), with non-statistically significant reductions in diabetes-related ACSCs (aRR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-1.00; P = .05) and a statistically significant reduction in all other ACSC hospitalizations (aRR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.85; P < .001). Among ACSC hospitalizations, no change was found in the percentage that included an intensive care unit stay (aRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04; P = .64), and no change was found in the length of stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98-1.06; P = .33). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cross-sectional study of adults enrolled in a large commercial health maintenance organization plan, the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with reductions in both non-ACSC and ACSC hospitalizations, with particularly large reductions seen in respiratory-related ACSCs. These reductions were likely due to many patient-level and health system-level factors associated with hospitalization rates. Further research into the causes and long-term outcomes associated with these reductions in ACSC admissions is needed to understand how the pandemic has affected the delivery of ambulatory and hospital care in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora V. Becker
- Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Monita Karmakar
- Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Renuka Tipirneni
- Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - John Z. Ayanian
- Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Driessen MLS, Sturms LM, Bloemers FW, Duis HJT, Edwards MJR, den Hartog D, Kuipers EJ, Leenhouts PA, Poeze M, Schipper IB, Spanjersberg RW, Wendt KW, de Wit RJ, van Zutphen SWAM, de Jongh MAC, Leenen LPH. The Detrimental Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Major Trauma Outcomes in the Netherlands: A Comprehensive Nationwide Study. Ann Surg 2022; 275:252-258. [PMID: 35007227 PMCID: PMC8745885 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the outcome of major trauma patients in the Netherlands. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Major trauma patients highly rely on immediate access to specialized services, including ICUs, shortages caused by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic may influence their outcome. METHODS A multi-center observational cohort study, based on the Dutch National Trauma Registry was performed. Characteristics, resource usage, and outcome of major trauma patients (injury severity score ≥16) treated at all trauma-receiving hospitals during the first COVID-19 peak (March 23 through May 10) were compared with those treated from the same period in 2018 and 2019 (reference period). RESULTS During the peak period, 520 major trauma patients were admitted, versus 570 on average in the pre-COVID-19 years. Significantly fewer patients were admitted to ICU facilities during the peak than during the reference period (49.6% vs 55.8%; P=0.016). Patients with less severe traumatic brain injuries in particular were less often admitted to the ICU during the peak (40.5% vs 52.5%; P=0.005). Moreover, this subgroup showed an increased mortality compared to the reference period (13.5% vs 7.7%; P=0.044). These results were confirmed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. In addition, a significant increase in observed versus predicted mortality was recorded for patients who had a priori predicted mortality of 50% to 75% (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 peak had an adverse effect on trauma care as major trauma patients were less often admitted to ICU and specifically those with minor through moderate brain injury had higher mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Frank W Bloemers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michael J R Edwards
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis den Hartog
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E J Kuipers
- Dutch Network for Emergency Care (LNAZ), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter A Leenhouts
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Poeze
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Inger B Schipper
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Klaus W Wendt
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph J de Wit
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
This cross-sectional study assesses US population access to emergency departments with acute stroke capabilities and telestroke capacity in 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kori S. Zachrison
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rebecca E. Cash
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Opeolu Adeoye
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Krislyn M. Boggs
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Lee H. Schwamm
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ateev Mehrotra
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carlos A. Camargo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Díaz-García E, García-Tovar S, Alfaro E, Zamarrón E, Mangas A, Galera R, Ruíz-Hernández JJ, Solé-Violán J, Rodríguez-Gallego C, Van-Den-Rym A, Pérez-de-Diego R, Nanwani-Nanwani K, López-Collazo E, García-Rio F, Cubillos-Zapata C. Role of CD39 in COVID-19 Severity: Dysregulation of Purinergic Signaling and Thromboinflammation. Front Immunol 2022; 13:847894. [PMID: 35173744 PMCID: PMC8841513 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.847894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
CD39/NTPDase1 has emerged as an important molecule that contributes to maintain inflammatory and coagulatory homeostasis. Various studies have hypothesized the possible role of CD39 in COVID-19 pathophysiology since no confirmatory data shed light in this regard. Therefore, we aimed to quantify CD39 expression on COVID-19 patients exploring its association with severity clinical parameters and ICU admission, while unraveling the role of purinergic signaling on thromboinflammation in COVID-19 patients. We selected a prospective cohort of patients hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia (n=75), a historical cohort of Influenza A pneumonia patients (n=18) and sex/age-matched healthy controls (n=30). CD39 was overexpressed in COVID-19 patients’ plasma and immune cell subsets and related to hypoxemia. Plasma soluble form of CD39 (sCD39) was related to length of hospital stay and independently associated with intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio 1.04, 95%CI 1.0-1.08, p=0.038), with a net reclassification index of 0.229 (0.118-0.287; p=0.036). COVID-19 patients showed extracellular accumulation of adenosine nucleotides (ATP and ADP), resulting in systemic inflammation and pro-coagulant state, as a consequence of purinergic pathway dysregulation. Interestingly, we found that COVID-19 plasma caused platelet activation, which was successfully blocked by the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, ticagrelor. Therefore, sCD39 is suggested as a promising biomarker for COVID-19 severity. As a conclusion, our study indicates that CD39 overexpression in COVID-19 patients could be indicating purinergic signaling dysregulation, which might be at the basis of COVID-19 thromboinflammation disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Díaz-García
- Respiratory Diseases Group, Respiratory Service, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara García-Tovar
- Respiratory Diseases Group, Respiratory Service, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Alfaro
- Respiratory Diseases Group, Respiratory Service, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ester Zamarrón
- Respiratory Diseases Group, Respiratory Service, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Mangas
- Respiratory Diseases Group, Respiratory Service, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Raúl Galera
- Respiratory Diseases Group, Respiratory Service, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - José Juan Ruíz-Hernández
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gran Canaria Dr Negrín University Hospital, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Jordi Solé-Violán
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
- Intensitive Care Medicine, Gran Canaria Dr Negrín University Hospital, Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Carlos Rodríguez-Gallego
- Departament of Immunology, Gran Canaria Dr Negrín University Hospital, Gran Canaria, Spain
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University Fernando Pessoa Canarias, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Ana Van-Den-Rym
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics of Human Diseases, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
- Interdepartmental Group of Immunodeficiencies, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebeca Pérez-de-Diego
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics of Human Diseases, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
- Interdepartmental Group of Immunodeficiencies, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Eduardo López-Collazo
- The Innate Immune Response Group, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco García-Rio
- Respiratory Diseases Group, Respiratory Service, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- *Correspondence: Francisco García-Rio, ; Carolina Cubillos-Zapata,
| | - Carolina Cubillos-Zapata
- Respiratory Diseases Group, Respiratory Service, La Paz University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario la Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Center on Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
- *Correspondence: Francisco García-Rio, ; Carolina Cubillos-Zapata,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Iuliano AD, Brunkard JM, Boehmer TK, Peterson E, Adjei S, Binder AM, Cobb S, Graff P, Hidalgo P, Panaggio MJ, Rainey JJ, Rao P, Soetebier K, Wacaster S, Ai C, Gupta V, Molinari NAM, Ritchey MD. Trends in Disease Severity and Health Care Utilization During the Early Omicron Variant Period Compared with Previous SARS-CoV-2 High Transmission Periods - United States, December 2020-January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:146-152. [PMID: 35085225 PMCID: PMC9351529 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104e4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 248] [Impact Index Per Article: 124.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was first clinically identified in the United States on December 1, 2021, and spread rapidly. By late December, it became the predominant strain, and by January 15, 2022, it represented 99.5% of sequenced specimens in the United States* (1). The Omicron variant has been shown to be more transmissible and less virulent than previously circulating variants (2,3). To better understand the severity of disease and health care utilization associated with the emergence of the Omicron variant in the United States, CDC examined data from three surveillance systems and a large health care database to assess multiple indicators across three high-COVID-19 transmission periods: December 1, 2020-February 28, 2021 (winter 2020-21); July 15-October 31, 2021 (SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 [Delta] predominance); and December 19, 2021-January 15, 2022 (Omicron predominance). The highest daily 7-day moving average to date of cases (798,976 daily cases during January 9-15, 2022), emergency department (ED) visits (48,238), and admissions (21,586) were reported during the Omicron period, however, the highest daily 7-day moving average of deaths (1,854) was lower than during previous periods. During the Omicron period, a maximum of 20.6% of staffed inpatient beds were in use for COVID-19 patients, 3.4 and 7.2 percentage points higher than during the winter 2020-21 and Delta periods, respectively. However, intensive care unit (ICU) bed use did not increase to the same degree: 30.4% of staffed ICU beds were in use for COVID-19 patients during the Omicron period, 0.5 percentage points lower than during the winter 2020-21 period and 1.2 percentage points higher than during the Delta period. The ratio of peak ED visits to cases (event-to-case ratios) (87 per 1,000 cases), hospital admissions (27 per 1,000 cases), and deaths (nine per 1,000 cases [lagged by 3 weeks]) during the Omicron period were lower than those observed during the winter 2020-21 (92, 68, and 16 respectively) and Delta (167, 78, and 13, respectively) periods. Further, among hospitalized COVID-19 patients from 199 U.S. hospitals, the mean length of stay and percentages who were admitted to an ICU, received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and died while in the hospital were lower during the Omicron period than during previous periods. COVID-19 disease severity appears to be lower during the Omicron period than during previous periods of high transmission, likely related to higher vaccination coverage,† which reduces disease severity (4), lower virulence of the Omicron variant (3,5,6), and infection-acquired immunity (3,7). Although disease severity appears lower with the Omicron variant, the high volume of ED visits and hospitalizations can strain local health care systems in the United States, and the average daily number of deaths remains substantial.§ This underscores the importance of national emergency preparedness, specifically, hospital surge capacity and the ability to adequately staff local health care systems. In addition, being up to date on vaccination and following other recommended prevention strategies are critical to preventing infections, severe illness, or death from COVID-19.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of statin treatment versus placebo on clinical outcomes in patients with covid-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN INSPIRATION/INSPIRATION-S was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial with a 2×2 factorial design. Results for the anticoagulation randomization have been reported previously. Results for the double blind randomization to atorvastatin versus placebo are reported here. SETTING 11 hospitals in Iran. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged ≥18 years with covid-19 admitted to the ICU. INTERVENTION Atorvastatin 20 mg orally once daily versus placebo, to be continued for 30 days from randomization irrespective of hospital discharge status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or all cause mortality within 30 days from randomization. Prespecified safety outcomes included increase in liver enzyme levels more than three times the upper limit of normal and clinically diagnosed myopathy. A clinical events committee blinded to treatment assignment adjudicated the efficacy and safety outcomes. RESULTS Of 605 patients randomized between 29 July 2020 and 4 April 2021 for statin randomization in the INSPIRATION-S trial, 343 were co-randomized to intermediate dose versus standard dose prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin based regimens, whereas 262 were randomized after completion of the anticoagulation study. 587 of the 605 participants were included in the primary analysis of INSPIRATION-S, reported here: 290 were assigned to atorvastatin and 297 to placebo (median age 57 years (interquartile range 45-68 years); 256 (44%) women). The primary outcome occurred in 95 (33%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and 108 (36%) assigned to placebo (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 1.21). Death occurred in 90 (31%) patients in the atorvastatin group and 103 (35%) in the placebo group (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 1.22). Rates for venous thromboembolism were 2% (n=6) in the atorvastatin group and 3% (n=9) in the placebo group (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 2.06). Myopathy was not clinically diagnosed in either group. Liver enzyme levels were increased in five (2%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and six (2%) assigned to placebo (odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 2.81). CONCLUSIONS In adults with covid-19 admitted to the ICU, atorvastatin was not associated with a significant reduction in the composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or all cause mortality compared with placebo. Treatment was, however, found to be safe. As the overall event rates were lower than expected, a clinically important treatment effect cannot be excluded. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04486508.
Collapse
|
12
|
Yek C, Warner S, Wiltz JL, Sun J, Adjei S, Mancera A, Silk BJ, Gundlapalli AV, Harris AM, Boehmer TK, Kadri SS. Risk Factors for Severe COVID-19 Outcomes Among Persons Aged ≥18 Years Who Completed a Primary COVID-19 Vaccination Series - 465 Health Care Facilities, United States, December 2020-October 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:19-25. [PMID: 34990440 PMCID: PMC8735560 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7101a4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
13
|
Ingraham A, Schumacher J, Fernandes-Taylor S, Yang DY, Godat L, Smith A, Barbosa R, Cribari C, Salim A, Schroeppel T, Staudenmayer K, Crandall M, Utter G. General surgeon involvement in the care of patients designated with an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-endorsed ICD-10-CM emergency general surgery diagnosis code in Wisconsin. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 92:117-125. [PMID: 34446657 PMCID: PMC8692334 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current national burden of emergency general surgery (EGS) illnesses and the extent of surgeon involvement in the care of these patients remain largely unknown. To inform needs assessments, research, and education, we sought to: (1) translate previously developed International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes representing EGS conditions to ICD 10th Revision, CM (ICD-10-CM) codes and (2) determine the national burden of and assess surgeon involvement across EGS conditions. METHODS We converted ICD-9-CM codes to candidate ICD-10-CM codes using General Equivalence Mappings then iteratively refined the code list. We used National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2017 data to develop a national estimate of the burden of EGS disease. To evaluate surgeon involvement, using Wisconsin Hospital Association discharge data (January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018), we selected adult urgent/emergent encounters with an EGS condition as the principal diagnosis. Surgeon involvement was defined as a surgeon being either the attending provider or procedural physician. RESULTS Four hundred and eighty-five ICD-9-CM codes mapped to 1,696 ICD-10-CM codes. The final list contained 985 ICD-10-CM codes. Nationally, there were 2,977,843 adult patient encounters with an ICD-10-CM EGS diagnosis. Of 94,903 EGS patients in the Wisconsin Hospital Association data set, most encounters were inpatient as compared with observation (75,878 [80.0%] vs. 19,025 [20.0%]). There were 57,780 patients (60.9%) that underwent any procedure. Among all Wisconsin EGS patients, most had no surgeon involvement (64.9% [n = 61,616]). Of the seven most common EGS diagnoses, surgeon involvement was highest for appendicitis (96.0%) and biliary tract disease (77.1%). For the other five most common conditions (skin/soft tissue infections, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, intestinal obstruction/ileus, pancreatitis, diverticular disease), surgeons were involved in roughly 20% of patient care episodes. CONCLUSION Surgeon involvement for EGS conditions ranges from highly likely (appendicitis) to relatively unlikely (skin/soft tissue infections). The wide range in surgeon involvement underscores the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in the care of EGS patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/epidemiological, Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Ingraham
- From the Department of Surgery (A.I., J.S., S.F.-T., D.-Y.Y.), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Surgery (L.G., A.S.), University of California-San Diego, San Diego, California; Department of Surgery (R.B.), Legacy Health, Portland, Oregon; Department of Surgery (C.C.), University of Colorado Health, Loveland, Colorado; Department of Surgery (A.S.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery (T.S.), University of Colorado Health, Colorado Springs, Colorado; Department of Surgery (K.S.), Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; Department of Surgery (M.C.), University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida; and Department of Surgery (G.U.), University of California-Davis, Sacramento, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hohl CM, Rosychuk RJ, Archambault PM, O'Sullivan F, Leeies M, Mercier É, Clark G, Innes GD, Brooks SC, Hayward J, Ho V, Jelic T, Welsford M, Sivilotti MLA, Morrison LJ, Perry JJ. The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Mortality Score to predict death among nonpalliative patients with COVID-19 presenting to emergency departments: a derivation and validation study. CMAJ Open 2022; 10:E90-E99. [PMID: 35135824 PMCID: PMC9259439 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predicting mortality from COVID-19 using information available when patients present to the emergency department can inform goals-of-care decisions and assist with ethical allocation of critical care resources. The study objective was to develop and validate a clinical score to predict emergency department and in-hospital mortality among consecutive nonpalliative patients with COVID-19; in this study, we define palliative patients as those who do not want resuscitative measures, such as intubation, intensive care unit care or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. METHODS This derivation and validation study used observational cohort data recruited from 46 hospitals in 8 Canadian provinces participating in the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN). We included adult (age ≥ 18 yr) nonpalliative patients with confirmed COVID-19 who presented to the emergency department of a participating site between Mar. 1, 2020, and Jan. 31, 2021. We randomly assigned hospitals to derivation or validation, and prespecified clinical variables as candidate predictors. We used logistic regression to develop the score in a derivation cohort and examined its performance in predicting emergency department and in-hospital mortality in a validation cohort. RESULTS Of 8761 eligible patients, 618 (7.0%) died. The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Mortality Score included age, sex, type of residence, arrival mode, chest pain, severe liver disease, respiratory rate and level of respiratory support. The area under the curve was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.93) in derivation and 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.93) in validation. The score had excellent calibration. These results suggest that scores of 6 or less would categorize patients as being at low risk for in-hospital death, with a negative predictive value of 99.9%. Patients in the low-risk group had an in-hospital mortality rate of 0.1%. Patients with a score of 15 or higher had an observed mortality rate of 81.0%. INTERPRETATION The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Mortality Score is a simple score that can be used for level-of-care discussions with patients and in situations of critical care resource constraints to accurately predict death using variables available on emergency department arrival. The score was derived and validated mostly in unvaccinated patients, and before variants of concern were circulating widely and newer treatment regimens implemented in Canada. STUDY REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT04702945.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinne M Hohl
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont.
| | - Rhonda J Rosychuk
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Patrick M Archambault
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Fiona O'Sullivan
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Murdoch Leeies
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Éric Mercier
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Gregory Clark
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Grant D Innes
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Steven C Brooks
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Jake Hayward
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Vi Ho
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Tomislav Jelic
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Michelle Welsford
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Marco L A Sivilotti
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Laurie J Morrison
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| | - Jeffrey J Perry
- Department of Emergency Medicine (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), University of British Columbia; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Hohl, O'Sullivan, Ho), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pediatrics (Rosychuk), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine (Archambault), Université Laval, Québec, Que.; Centre de recherche du Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Archambault), Lévis, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Leeies, Jelic) and Section of Critical Care Medicine (Leeies), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de recherche (Mercier), CHU de Québec, Université Laval; VITAM (Centre de recherche en santé durable) (Mercier), Québec, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Clark), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Emergency Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Innes), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Brooks, Sivilotti), Queen's University, Kingston, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Hayward), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Division of Emergency Medicine (Welsford), McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences (Welsford), Hamilton, Ont.; Kingston Health Sciences Centre (Sivilotti), Kingston, Ont.; Emergency Services (Morrison), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Division of Emergency Medicine (Morrison), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Emergency Medicine (Perry), University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (Perry), Ottawa, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saunders R, Davis JA, Bosma KJ. Proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors for mechanical ventilation: a cost-utility analysis. CMAJ Open 2022; 10:E126-E135. [PMID: 35168935 PMCID: PMC9259387 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20210078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanical ventilation is an important component of patient critical care, but it adds expense to an already high-cost setting. This study evaluates the cost-utility of 2 modes of ventilation: proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV+ mode) versus pressure-support ventilation (PSV). METHODS We adapted a published Markov model to the Canadian hospital-payer perspective with a 1-year time horizon. The patient population modelled includes all patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who have completed the acute phase of ventilatory support and have entered the recovery phase. Clinical and cost inputs were informed by a structured literature review, with the comparative effectiveness of PAV+ mode estimated via pragmatic meta-analysis. Primary outcomes of interest were costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the (incremental) cost per QALY for patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Results were reported in 2017 Canadian dollars. We conducted probabilistic and scenario analyses to assess model uncertainty. RESULTS Over 1 year, PSV had costs of $50 951 and accrued 0.25 QALYs. Use of PAV+ mode was associated with care costs of $43 309 and 0.29 QALYs. Compared to PSV, PAV+ mode was considered likely to be cost-effective, having lower costs (-$7642) and increased QALYs (+0.04) after 1 year. In cost-effectiveness acceptability analysis, 100% of simulations would be cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY gained. INTERPRETATION Use of PAV+ mode is expected to benefit patient care in the intensive care unit (ICU) and be a cost-effective alternative to PSV in the Canadian setting. Canadian hospital payers may therefore consider how best to optimally deliver mechanical ventilation in the ICU as they expand ICU capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhodri Saunders
- Coreva Scientific & Co (Saunders, Davis), KÖnigswinter, Germany; University of Western Ontario (Bosma); London Health Sciences Centre (Bosma), University Hospital, London, Ont
| | - Jason A Davis
- Coreva Scientific & Co (Saunders, Davis), KÖnigswinter, Germany; University of Western Ontario (Bosma); London Health Sciences Centre (Bosma), University Hospital, London, Ont
| | - Karen J Bosma
- Coreva Scientific & Co (Saunders, Davis), KÖnigswinter, Germany; University of Western Ontario (Bosma); London Health Sciences Centre (Bosma), University Hospital, London, Ont.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kirschen MP, LaRovere K, Balakrishnan B, Erklauer J, Francoeur C, Ganesan SL, Jayakar A, Lovett M, Luchette M, Press CA, Wolf M, Ferrazzano P, Wainwright MS, Appavu B. A Survey of Neuromonitoring Practices in North American Pediatric Intensive Care Units. Pediatr Neurol 2022; 126:125-130. [PMID: 34864306 PMCID: PMC9135309 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuromonitoring is the use of continuous measures of brain physiology to detect clinically important events in real-time. Neuromonitoring devices can be invasive or non-invasive and are typically used on patients with acute brain injury or at high risk for brain injury. The goal of this study was to characterize neuromonitoring infrastructure and practices in North American pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). METHODS An electronic, web-based survey was distributed to 70 North American institutions participating in the Pediatric Neurocritical Care Research Group. Questions related to the clinical use of neuromonitoring devices, integrative multimodality neuromonitoring capabilities, and neuromonitoring infrastructure were included. Survey results were presented using descriptive statistics. RESULTS The survey was completed by faculty at 74% (52 of 70) of institutions. All 52 institutions measure intracranial pressure and have electroencephalography capability, whereas 87% (45 of 52) use near-infrared spectroscopy and 40% (21/52) use transcranial Doppler. Individual patient monitoring decisions were driven by institutional protocols and collaboration between critical care, neurology, and neurosurgery attendings. Reported device utilization varied by brain injury etiology. Only 15% (eight of 52) of institutions utilized a multimodality neuromonitoring platform to integrate and synchronize data from multiple devices. A database of neuromonitoring patients was maintained at 35% (18 of 52) of institutions. Funding for neuromonitoring programs was variable with contributions from hospitals (19%, 10 of 52), private donations (12%, six of 52), and research funds (12%, six of 52), although 73% (40 of 52) have no dedicated funds. CONCLUSIONS Neuromonitoring indications, devices, and infrastructure vary by institution in North American pediatric critical care units. Noninvasive modalities were utilized more liberally, although not uniformly, than invasive monitoring. Further studies are needed to standardize the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of clinical neuromonitoring data, and to determine whether neuromonitoring systems impact neurological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Kirschen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Kerri LaRovere
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Binod Balakrishnan
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children's Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Jennifer Erklauer
- Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Neurology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Conall Francoeur
- Department of Pediatrics, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Saptharishi Lalgudi Ganesan
- Department of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital of Western Ontario, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry at the Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anuj Jayakar
- Department of Neurology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | - Marlina Lovett
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Matthew Luchette
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Craig A Press
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Michael Wolf
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Peter Ferrazzano
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Mark S Wainwright
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brian Appavu
- Department of Neurosciences, Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, Phoenix, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mou Z, Godat LN, El-Kareh R, Berndtson AE, Doucet JJ, Costantini TW. Electronic health record machine learning model predicts trauma inpatient mortality in real time: A validation study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 92:74-80. [PMID: 34932043 PMCID: PMC9032917 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient outcome prediction models are underused in clinical practice because of lack of integration with real-time patient data. The electronic health record (EHR) has the ability to use machine learning (ML) to develop predictive models. While an EHR ML model has been developed to predict clinical deterioration, it has yet to be validated for use in trauma. We hypothesized that the Epic Deterioration Index (EDI) would predict mortality and unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission in trauma patients. METHODS A retrospective analysis of a trauma registry was used to identify patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center for >24 hours from October 2019 to July 2020. We evaluated the performance of the EDI, which is constructed from 125 objective patient measures within the EHR, in predicting mortality and unplanned ICU admissions. We performed a 5 to 1 match on age because it is a major component of EDI, then examined the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and benchmarked it against Injury Severity Score (ISS) and new injury severity score (NISS). RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 1,325 patients admitted with a mean age of 52.5 years and 91% following blunt injury. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2%, and unplanned ICU admission rate was 2.6%. In predicting mortality, the maximum EDI within 24 hours of admission had an AUROC of 0.98 compared with 0.89 of ISS and 0.91 of NISS. For unplanned ICU admission, the EDI slope within 24 hours of ICU admission had a modest performance with an AUROC of 0.66. CONCLUSION Epic Deterioration Index appears to perform strongly in predicting in-patient mortality similarly to ISS and NISS. In addition, it can be used to predict unplanned ICU admissions. This study helps validate the use of this real-time EHR ML-based tool, suggesting that EDI should be incorporated into the daily care of trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic, level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongyang Mou
- Department of Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Laura N. Godat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Robert El-Kareh
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Allison E. Berndtson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Jay J. Doucet
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Todd W. Costantini
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zebrowski AM, Hsu JY, Holena DN, Wiebe DJ, Carr BG. Developing a measure of overall intensity of injury care: A latent class analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 92:193-200. [PMID: 34225349 PMCID: PMC8692337 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While injury is a leading cause of death and debility in older adults, the relationship between intensity of care and trauma remains unknown. The focus of this analysis is to measure the overall intensity of care delivered to injured older adults during hospitalization. METHODS We used Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare fee-for-service claims data (2013-2014), to identify emergency department-based claims for moderate and severe blunt trauma in age-eligible beneficiaries. Medical procedures associated with care intensity were identified using a modified Delphi method. A latent class model was estimated using the identified procedures, intensive care unit length of stay, demographics, and injury characteristics. Clinical phenotypes for each class were explored. RESULTS A total of 683,398 cases were classified as low- (73%), moderate- (23%), and high-intensity care (4%). Greater age and reduced injury severity were indicators of lower intensity, while males, non-Whites, and nonfall mechanisms were more common with high intensity. Intubation/mechanical ventilation was an indicator of high intensity and often occurred with at least one other procedure or an extended intensive care unit stay. CONCLUSION This work demonstrates that, although heterogeneous, care for blunt trauma can be evaluated using a single novel measure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE For prognostic/epidemiological studies, level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis M. Zebrowski
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Jesse Y. Hsu
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Daniel N. Holena
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Traumatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Douglas J. Wiebe
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Brendan G. Carr
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bloom CI, Cullinan P, Wedzicha JA. Asthma Phenotypes and COVID-19 Risk: A Population-based Observational Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 205:36-45. [PMID: 34669568 PMCID: PMC8865578 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202107-1704oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Studies have suggested some patients with asthma are at risk of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19), but they have had limited data on asthma phenotype and have not considered if risks are specific to COVID-19. Objectives: To determine the effect of asthma phenotype on three levels of COVID-19 outcomes. Compare hospitalization rates with influenza and pneumonia. Methods: Electronic medical records were used to identify patients with asthma and match them to the general population. Patient-level data were linked to Public Health England severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test data, hospital, and mortality data. Asthma was phenotyped by medication, exacerbation history, and type 2 inflammation. The risk of each outcome, adjusted for major risk factors, was measured using Cox regression. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 434,348 patients with asthma and 748,327 matched patients were included. All patients with asthma had a significantly increased risk of a General Practice diagnosis of COVID-19. Asthma with regular inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.61), intermittent ICS plus add-on asthma medication use (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.43-2.79), regular ICS plus add-on use (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.37-1.94), or with frequent exacerbations (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.34-2.47) was significantly associated with hospitalization. These phenotypes were significantly associated with influenza and pneumonia hospitalizations. Only patients with regular ICS plus add-on asthma therapy (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.27-2.26) or frequent exacerbations (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.03-2.68) had a significantly higher risk of ICU admission or death. Atopy and blood eosinophil count were not associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes. Conclusions: More severe asthma was associated with more severe COVID-19 outcomes, but type 2 inflammation was not. The risk of COVID-19 hospitalization appeared to be similar to the risk with influenza or pneumonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paul Cullinan
- Section of Genomic and Environmental Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Maltser S, Trovato E, Fusco HN, Sison CP, Ambrose AF, Herrera J, Murphy S, Kirshblum S, Bartels MN, Bagay L, Oh-Park M, Stein AB, Cuccurullo S, Nori P, Donovan J, Dams-O’Connor K, Amorapanth P, Barbuto SA, Bloom O, Escalon MX. Challenges and Lessons Learned for Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation of Persons With COVID-19: Clinical Presentation, Assessment, Needs, and Services Utilization. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 100:1115-1123. [PMID: 34793372 PMCID: PMC8594401 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000001887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to present: (1) physiatric care delivery amid the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, (2) challenges, (3) data from the first cohort of post-COVID-19 inpatient rehabilitation facility patients, and (4) lessons learned by a research consortium of New York and New Jersey rehabilitation institutions. DESIGN For this clinical descriptive retrospective study, data were extracted from post-COVID-19 patient records treated at a research consortium of New York and New Jersey rehabilitation inpatient rehabilitation facilities (May 1-June 30, 2020) to characterize admission criteria, physical space, precautions, bed numbers, staffing, employee wellness, leadership, and family communication. For comparison, data from the Uniform Data System and eRehabData databases were analyzed. The research consortium of New York and New Jersey rehabilitation members discussed experiences and lessons learned. RESULTS The COVID-19 patients (N = 320) were treated during the study period. Most patients were male, average age of 61.9 yrs, and 40.9% were White. The average acute care length of stay before inpatient rehabilitation facility admission was 24.5 days; mean length of stay at inpatient rehabilitation facilities was 15.2 days. The rehabilitation research consortium of New York and New Jersey rehabilitation institutions reported a greater proportion of COVID-19 patients discharged to home compared with prepandemic data. Some institutions reported higher changes in functional scores during rehabilitation admission, compared with prepandemic data. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic acutely affected patient care and overall institutional operations. The research consortium of New York and New Jersey rehabilitation institutions responded dynamically to bed expansions/contractions, staff deployment, and innovations that facilitated safe and effective patient care.
Collapse
|
21
|
Carrasco-Sánchez FJ, López-Carmona MD, Martínez-Marcos FJ, Pérez-Belmonte LM, Hidalgo-Jiménez A, Buonaiuto V, Suárez Fernández C, Freire Castro SJ, Luordo D, Pesqueira Fontan PM, Blázquez Encinar JC, Magallanes Gamboa JO, de la Peña Fernández A, Torres Peña JD, Fernández Solà J, Napal Lecumberri JJ, Amorós Martínez F, Guisado Espartero ME, Jorge Ripper C, Gómez Méndez R, Vicente López N, Román Bernal B, Rojano Rivero MG, Ramos Rincón JM, Gómez Huelgas R. Admission hyperglycaemia as a predictor of mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 regardless of diabetes status: data from the Spanish SEMI-COVID-19 Registry. Ann Med 2021; 53:103-116. [PMID: 33063540 PMCID: PMC7651248 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1836566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hyperglycaemia has emerged as an important risk factor for death in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between blood glucose (BG) levels and in-hospital mortality in non-critically patients hospitalized with COVID-19. METHODS This is a retrospective multi-centre study involving patients hospitalized in Spain. Patients were categorized into three groups according to admission BG levels: <140 mg/dL, 140-180 mg/dL and >180 mg/dL. The primary endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality. RESULTS Of the 11,312 patients, only 2128 (18.9%) had diabetes and 2289 (20.4%) died during hospitalization. The in-hospital mortality rates were 15.7% (<140 mg/dL), 33.7% (140-180 mg) and 41.1% (>180 mg/dL), p<.001. The cumulative probability of mortality was significantly higher in patients with hyperglycaemia compared to patients with normoglycaemia (log rank, p<.001), independently of pre-existing diabetes. Hyperglycaemia (after adjusting for age, diabetes, hypertension and other confounding factors) was an independent risk factor of mortality (BG >180 mg/dL: HR 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-1.73) (BG 140-180 mg/dL; HR 1.48; 95%CI: 1.29-1.70). Hyperglycaemia was also associated with requirement for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality. CONCLUSIONS Admission hyperglycaemia is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality in non-critically hospitalized COVID-19 patients regardless of prior history of diabetes. KEY MESSAGE Admission hyperglycaemia is a stronger and independent risk factor for mortality in COVID-19. Screening for hyperglycaemia, in patients without diabetes, and early treatment of hyperglycaemia should be mandatory in the management of patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Admission hyperglycaemia should not be overlooked in all patients regardless prior history of diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Verónica Buonaiuto
- Internal Medicine Department, Málaga Regional University Hospital, Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Davide Luordo
- Internal Medicine Department, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Parla, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - José David Torres Peña
- Lipis and Atherosclerosis Unit, Department of Interna Medicine, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Reina Sofia University Hospital, University of Córdoba, Spain
- CIBER Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Insituto de Salud Carlos III, Córdoba, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Carlos Jorge Ripper
- Internal Medicine Department, Insular de Gran Canaria Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Raquel Gómez Méndez
- Internal Medicine Department, Lucus Augusti University Hospital, Lugo, Spain
| | | | - Berta Román Bernal
- Internal Medicine Department, Doctor José Molina Orosa Hospital, Arrecife, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
A male sex bias has emerged in the COVID-19 pandemic, fitting to the sex-biased pattern in other viral infections. Males are 2.84 times more often admitted to the ICU and mortality is 1.39 times higher as a result of COVID-19. Various factors play a role in this, and novel studies suggest that the gene-dose of Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) 7 could contribute to the sex-skewed severity. TLR7 is one of the crucial pattern recognition receptors for SARS-CoV-2 ssRNA and the gene-dose effect is caused by X chromosome inactivation (XCI) escape. Female immune cells with TLR7 XCI escape have biallelic TLR7 expression and produce more type 1 interferon (IFN) upon TLR7 stimulation. In COVID-19, TLR7 in plasmacytoid dendritic cells is one of the pattern recognition receptors responsible for IFN production and a delayed IFN response has been associated with immunopathogenesis and mortality. Here, we provide a hypothesis that females may be protected to some extend against severe COVID-19, due to the biallelic TLR7 expression, allowing them to mount a stronger and more protective IFN response early after infection. Studies exploring COVID-19 treatment via the TLR7-mediated IFN pathway should consider this sex difference. Various factors such as age, sex hormones and escape modulation remain to be investigated concerning the TLR7 gene-dose effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna E. Spiering
- Amsterdam University College, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Teun J. de Vries
- Amsterdam University College, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Quach BI, Qureshi D, Talarico R, Hsu AT, Tanuseputro P. Comparison of End-of-Life Care Between Recent Immigrants and Long-standing Residents in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2132397. [PMID: 34726744 PMCID: PMC8564577 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Recent immigrants face unique cultural and logistical challenges that differ from those of long-standing residents, which may influence the type of care they receive at the end of life. OBJECTIVE To compare places of care among recent immigrants and long-standing residents in Canada in the last 90 days of life. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based retrospective cohort study used linked health administrative data on individuals from Ontario, Canada, who died between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, extracted on February 26, 2020. Individuals were categorized by immigration status: recent immigrants (since 1985) and long-standing residents. Data were analyzed from December 27, 2019, to February 26, 2020. EXPOSURES All decedents who immigrated to Canada between 1985 and 2016 were classified as recent immigrants. Subgroup analyses assessed the association of region of origin. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was place of care, including institutional and noninstitutional settings, in the last 90 days of life. Descriptive statistics were used to compare characteristics and health service utilization among recent immigrants and long-standing residents. Negative binomial regression models estimated the rate ratios (RR) of using acute care and long-term care in the last 90 days of life. RESULTS A total of 376 617 deceased individuals (median [IQR] age, 80 [68-88] years; 187 439 [49.8%] women and 189 178 [50.2%] men) were identified, among whom 22 423 (6.0%) were recent immigrants; recent immigrants were younger than long-standing residents (median [IQR] age, 76 [60-85] years vs 81 [69-88] years; P < .001), more likely to be living in lower income neighborhoods (12 357 immigrants [55.1%] vs 166 017 long-standing residents [46.9%] in the lower 2 income quintiles; P < .001), and had a higher Charlson Index score (score ≥5, 6294 immigrants [28.1%] vs 74 809 long-standing residents [21.1%]; P < .001). In the last 90 days of life, recent immigrants spent more days in intensive care units than long-standing residents (mean [SD], 2.64 [8.73] days vs 1.47 [5.70] days; P < .001), while long-standing residents spent more days using long-term care than recent immigrants (mean [SD], 19.49 [35.81] days vs 10.45 [27.42] days; P < .001). Being a recent immigrant was associated with a greater likelihood of acute inpatient care use (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.18-1.24) and lower likelihood of long-term care use (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.63-0.70), after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that at the end of life, recent immigrants were significantly more likely to receive inpatient and intensive care unit services and die in acute care settings compared with long-standing residents. Further research is needed to examine differences in care preference and disparities for immigrant groups of different origins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley I. Quach
- Faculty of Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Danial Qureshi
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Amy T. Hsu
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- ICES, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Greenwood-Ericksen M, Kamdar N, Lin P, George N, Myaskovsky L, Crandall C, Mohr NM, Kocher KE. Association of Rural and Critical Access Hospital Status With Patient Outcomes After Emergency Department Visits Among Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2134980. [PMID: 34797370 PMCID: PMC8605483 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Rural US residents disproportionately rely on emergency departments (ED), yet little is known about patient outcomes after ED visits to rural hospitals or critical access hospitals (CAHs). OBJECTIVE To compare 30-day outcomes after rural vs urban ED visits and in CAHs, a subset of rural hospitals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study used a 20% sample of national Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from January 1, 2011, to October 31, 2015. Rural and urban ED visits were matched on demographics, patient prior use of EDs, comorbidities, and diagnoses. Thirty-day outcomes overall and stratified by 25 common ED diagnoses were evaluated, with similar analysis of CAHs vs non-CAHs. Data were analyzed from February 15, 2020, to May 17, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were ED revisits with and without hospitalization. RESULTS The matched cohort included 473 152 rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries with a mean (SD) age of 75.1 (7.9) years (59.1% and 59.3% women, respectively; 86.9% and 87.1% White, respectively). Medicare beneficiaries at rural vs urban EDs experienced similar all-cause 30-day mortality (3.9% vs 4.1%; effect size, 0.01), ED revisits (18.1% vs 17.8%; effect size, 0.00), and ED revisits with hospitalization (6.0% vs 8.1%; effect size, 0.00). Rural ED visits were associated with more transfer (6.2% vs 2.0%; effect size, 0.22) and fewer hospitalizations (24.7% vs 39.2; effect size, 0.31). Stratified by diagnosis, patients in rural EDs with life-threatening illnesses experienced more transfer with 30-day mortality similar to that of patients in urban EDs. In contrast, mortality differed for patients in rural EDs with symptom-based diagnoses, including chest pain (odds ratio [OR], 1.54 [95% CI, 1.25-1.89]), nausea and vomiting (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.26-2.24), and abdominal pain (OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.42-2.10]). All findings were similar for CAHs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this cohort study of rural ED care suggest that patient mortality for potentially life-threatening conditions is comparable to that in urban settings. Further research is needed to understand the sources of greater rural ED mortality for symptom-based conditions. These findings underscore the importance of ensuring access to treatment of life-threatening conditions at local EDs in rural communities, which are increasingly endangered by hospital closures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Greenwood-Ericksen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
| | - Neil Kamdar
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Paul Lin
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Naomi George
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
| | - Larissa Myaskovsky
- Center for Healthcare Equity in Kidney Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque
| | - Cameron Crandall
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
| | - Nicholas M. Mohr
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City
- Department of Anesthesia–Critical Care Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | - Keith E. Kocher
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Muhle P, Konert K, Suntrup-Krueger S, Claus I, Labeit B, Ogawa M, Warnecke T, Wirth R, Dziewas R. Oropharyngeal Dysphagia and Impaired Motility of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract-Is There a Clinical Link in Neurocritical Care? Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13113879. [PMID: 34836134 PMCID: PMC8618237 DOI: 10.3390/nu13113879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients in the neurological ICU are at risk of suffering from disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) can be caused by the underlying neurological disease and/or ICU treatment itself. The latter was also identified as a risk factor for gastrointestinal dysmotility. However, its association with OD and the impact of the neurological condition is unclear. Here, we investigated a possible link between OD and gastric residual volume (GRV) in patients in the neurological ICU. In this retrospective single-center study, patients with an episode of mechanical ventilation (MV) admitted to the neurological ICU due to an acute neurological disease or acute deterioration of a chronic neurological condition from 2011–2017 were included. The patients were submitted to an endoscopic swallowing evaluation within 72 h of the completion of MV. Their GRV was assessed daily. Patients with ≥1 d of GRV ≥500 mL were compared to all the other patients. Regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of GRV ≥500 mL/d. With respect to GRV, the groups were compared depending on their FEES scores (0–3). A total of 976 patients were included in this study. A total of 35% demonstrated a GRV of ≥500 mL/d at least once. The significant predictors of relevant GRV were age, male gender, infratentorial or hemorrhagic stroke, prolonged MV and poor swallowing function. The patients with the poorest swallowing function presented a GRV of ≥500 mL/d significantly more often than the patients who scored the best. Conclusions: Our findings indicate an association between dysphagia severity and delayed gastric emptying in critically ill neurologic patients. This may partly be due to lesions in the swallowing and gastric network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Muhle
- Department of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 1 A, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (K.K.); (S.S.-K.); (I.C.); (B.L.); (T.W.)
- Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Muenster, Malmedyweg 15, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Karen Konert
- Department of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 1 A, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (K.K.); (S.S.-K.); (I.C.); (B.L.); (T.W.)
| | - Sonja Suntrup-Krueger
- Department of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 1 A, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (K.K.); (S.S.-K.); (I.C.); (B.L.); (T.W.)
- Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Muenster, Malmedyweg 15, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Inga Claus
- Department of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 1 A, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (K.K.); (S.S.-K.); (I.C.); (B.L.); (T.W.)
| | - Bendix Labeit
- Department of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 1 A, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (K.K.); (S.S.-K.); (I.C.); (B.L.); (T.W.)
- Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University Hospital Muenster, Malmedyweg 15, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Mao Ogawa
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan;
| | - Tobias Warnecke
- Department of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus, 1 A, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (K.K.); (S.S.-K.); (I.C.); (B.L.); (T.W.)
| | - Rainer Wirth
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44625 Herne, Germany;
| | - Rainer Dziewas
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Am Finkenhügel 1, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Woo SH, Rios-Diaz AJ, Kubey AA, Cheney-Peters DR, Ackermann LL, Chalikonda DM, Venkataraman CM, Riley JM, Baram M. Development and Validation of a Web-Based Severe COVID-19 Risk Prediction Model. Am J Med Sci 2021; 362:355-362. [PMID: 34029558 PMCID: PMC8141270 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) carries high morbidity and mortality globally. Identification of patients at risk for clinical deterioration upon presentation would aid in triaging, prognostication, and allocation of resources and experimental treatments. RESEARCH QUESTION Can we develop and validate a web-based risk prediction model for identification of patients who may develop severe COVID-19, defined as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and/or death? METHODS This retrospective cohort study reviewed 415 patients admitted to a large urban academic medical center and community hospitals. Covariates included demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. The independent association of predictors with severe COVID-19 was determined using multivariable logistic regression. A derivation cohort (n=311, 75%) was used to develop the prediction models. The models were tested by a validation cohort (n=104, 25%). RESULTS The median age was 66 years (Interquartile range [IQR] 54-77) and the majority were male (55%) and non-White (65.8%). The 14-day severe COVID-19 rate was 39.3%; 31.7% required ICU, 24.6% mechanical ventilation, and 21.2% died. Machine learning algorithms and clinical judgment were used to improve model performance and clinical utility, resulting in the selection of eight predictors: age, sex, dyspnea, diabetes mellitus, troponin, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, and aspartate aminotransferase. The discriminative ability was excellent for both the severe COVID-19 (training area under the curve [AUC]=0.82, validation AUC=0.82) and mortality (training AUC= 0.85, validation AUC=0.81) models. These models were incorporated into a mobile-friendly website. CONCLUSIONS This web-based risk prediction model can be used at the bedside for prediction of severe COVID-19 using data mostly available at the time of presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang H Woo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Arturo J Rios-Diaz
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alan A Kubey
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Dianna R Cheney-Peters
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lily L Ackermann
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Divya M Chalikonda
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Joshua M Riley
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Baram
- Department of Medicine - Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Thomas Jefferson University. Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cleveland EM, Warren YE, Shenoy R, Lewis MR, Cunningham KW, Wang H, Huynh TT, Brintzenhoff RA. Critical care ultrasound in geriatric trauma resuscitation leads to decreased fluid administration and ventilator days. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 91:612-620. [PMID: 34254956 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Geriatric trauma populations respond differently than younger trauma populations. Critical care ultrasound (CCUS) can guide resuscitation, and it has been shown to decrease intravenous fluid (IVF), lower time until operation, and lower mortality in trauma. Critical care ultrasound-guided resuscitation has not yet been studied in geriatric trauma. We hypothesized that incorporation of CCUS would decrease amount of IVF administered, decrease time to initiation of vasopressors, and decrease end organ dysfunction. METHODS A PRE-CCUS geriatric trauma group between January 2015 and October 2016 was resuscitated per standard practice. A POST-CCUS group between January 2017 and December 2018 was resuscitated based on CCUS performed by trained intensivist upon admission to the intensive care unit and 6 hours after initial ultrasound. The PRE-CCUS and POST-CCUS groups underwent propensity score matching, yielding 60 enrollees in each arm. Retrospective review was conducted for demographics, clinical outcomes, and primary endpoints, including amount of IVF in the first 48 hours, duration to initiation of vasopressor use, and end organ dysfunction. Wilcoxon two-sample, χ2 tests, and κ statistics were performed to check associations between groups. RESULTS There was no statistical difference between PRE-CCUS and POST-CCUS demographics and Injury Severity Scores. Intravenous fluid within 48 hours decreased from median [interquartile range] of 4941 mL [4019 mL] in the PRE-CCUS to 2633 mL [3671 mL] in the POST-CCUS (p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference between the two groups in time to initiation of vasopressors, vasopressor duration, lactate clearance, intensive care unit length of stay, or hospital length of stay. There was a significant decrease in ventilator days, with 26.7% PRE-CCUS with ventilation longer than 2 days, and only 6.7% POST-CCUS requiring ventilation longer than 2 days (p = 0.0033). CONCLUSION Critical care ultrasound can be a useful addition to geriatric resuscitation. The POST-CCUS received less IV fluid and had decreased ventilator days. While mortality, lactate clearance, complications, and hospital stay were not statistically different, there was a perception that CCUS was a useful adjunct for assessing volume status and cardiac function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, level II.
Collapse
|
28
|
Maddaloni E, D'Onofrio L, Siena A, Luordi C, Mignogna C, Amendolara R, Cavallari I, Grigioni F, Buzzetti R. Impact of cardiovascular disease on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with Covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intern Emerg Med 2021; 16:1975-1985. [PMID: 34273056 PMCID: PMC8285708 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02804-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Contrasting data have been published about the impact of cardiovascular disease on Covid-19. A comprehensive synthesis and pooled analysis of the available evidence is needed to guide prioritization of prevention strategies. To clarify the association of cardiovascular disease with Covid-19 outcomes, we searched PubMed up to 26 October 2020, for studies reporting the prevalence of cardiovascular disease among inpatients with Covid-19 in relation to their outcomes. Pooled odds-ratios (OR) for death, for mechanical ventilation or admission in an intensive care unit (ICU) and for composite outcomes were calculated using random effect models overall and in the subgroup of people with comorbid diabetes. Thirty-three studies enrolling 52,857 inpatients were included. Cardiovascular disease was associated with a higher risk of death both overall (OR 2.58, 95% confidence intervals, CI 2.12-3.14, p < 0.001, number of studies 24) and in the subgroup of people with diabetes (OR 2.91, 95% CI 2.13-3.97, p < 0.001, number of studies 4), but not with higher risk of ICU admission or mechanical ventilation (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.73-2.50, p = 0.34, number of studies 4). Four out of five studies reporting OR adjusted for confounders failed to show independent association of cardiovascular disease with Covid-19 deaths. Accordingly, the adjusted-OR for Covid-19 death in people with cardiovascular disease dropped to 1.31 (95% CI 1.01-1.70, p = 0.041). Among patients hospitalized for Covid-19, cardiovascular disease confers higher risk of death, which was highly mitigated when adjusting the association for confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Maddaloni
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Luca D'Onofrio
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Siena
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Cecilia Luordi
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmen Mignogna
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Amendolara
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cavallari
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Grigioni
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Raffaella Buzzetti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rushing AP, Strassels SA, Ricci KB, Daniel VT, Ingraham AM, Paredes AZ, Diaz A, Oslock WM, Baselice HE, Heh VK, Santry HP. In-house intensivist presence does not affect mortality in select emergency general surgery patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 91:719-727. [PMID: 34238856 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the relationship between availability of round-the-clock (RTC) in-house intensivists and patient outcomes in people who underwent surgery for a life-threatening emergency general surgery (LT-EGS) disease such as necrotizing soft-tissue infection, ischemic enteritis, perforated viscus, and toxic colitis. METHODS Data on hospital-level critical care structures and processes from a 2015 survey of 2,811 US hospitals were linked to patient-level data from 17 State Inpatient Databases. Patients who were admitted with a primary diagnosis code for an LT-EGS disease of interest and underwent surgery on date of admission were included in analyses. RESULTS We identified 3,620 unique LT-EGS admissions at 368 hospitals. At 66% (n = 243) of hospitals, 83.5% (n = 3,021) of patients were treated at hospitals with RTC intensivist-led care. These facilities were more likely to have in-house respiratory therapists and protocols to ensure availability of blood products or adherence to Surviving Sepsis Guidelines. When accounting for other key factors including overnight surgeon availability, perioperative staffing, and annual emergency general surgery case volume, not having a protocol to ensure adherence to Surviving Sepsis Guidelines (adjusted odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.94) was associated with increased odds of mortality. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that focused treatment of sepsis along with surgical source control, rather than RTC intensivist presence, is key feature of optimizing EGS patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy P Rushing
- From the Department of Surgery-Trauma (A.P.R.), University Hospitals, Cleveland; Department of Surgery (S.A.S., A.Z.P., A.D., H.E.B., V.K.H.), Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center; Department of Surgery (K.B.R.), Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery (W.M.O.), University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL; Consulting Studio (H.P.S.), NBBJ Design LLC, Columbus, OH; Department of Trauma Surgery (H.P.S.), Kettering Medical Center, Kettering, OH; Center for Surgical Health Assessment, Research and Policy (S.A.S., K.B.R., A.Z.P., A.D., H.E.B., V.K.H., H.P.S.), Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Department of Dermatology (V.T.D.), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester MA; Department of Surgery (A.M.I.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; and Ohio State University College of Medicine (W.M.O.), Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lorenzen SS, Nielsen M, Jimenez-Solem E, Petersen TS, Perner A, Thorsen-Meyer HC, Igel C, Sillesen M. Using machine learning for predicting intensive care unit resource use during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark. Sci Rep 2021; 11:18959. [PMID: 34556789 PMCID: PMC8460747 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98617-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has put massive strains on hospitals, and tools to guide hospital planners in resource allocation during the ebbs and flows of the pandemic are urgently needed. We investigate whether machine learning (ML) can be used for predictions of intensive care requirements a fixed number of days into the future. Retrospective design where health Records from 42,526 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients in Denmark was extracted. Random Forest (RF) models were trained to predict risk of ICU admission and use of mechanical ventilation after n days (n = 1, 2, …, 15). An extended analysis was provided for n = 5 and n = 10. Models predicted n-day risk of ICU admission with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) between 0.981 and 0.995, and n-day risk of use of ventilation with an ROC-AUC between 0.982 and 0.997. The corresponding n-day forecasting models predicted the needed ICU capacity with a coefficient of determination (R2) between 0.334 and 0.989 and use of ventilation with an R2 between 0.446 and 0.973. The forecasting models performed worst, when forecasting many days into the future (for large n). For n = 5, ICU capacity was predicted with ROC-AUC 0.990 and R2 0.928, and use of ventilator was predicted with ROC-AUC 0.994 and R2 0.854. Random Forest-based modelling can be used for accurate n-day forecasting predictions of ICU resource requirements, when n is not too large.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mads Nielsen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Espen Jimenez-Solem
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Phase IV Unit (Phase4CPH), Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tonny Studsgaard Petersen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Perner
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Christian Igel
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin Sillesen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Center for Surgical Translational and Artificial Intelligence Research (CSTAR), Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kadri SS, Sun J, Lawandi A, Strich JR, Busch LM, Keller M, Babiker A, Yek C, Malik S, Krack J, Dekker JP, Spaulding AB, Ricotta E, Powers JH, Rhee C, Klompas M, Athale J, Boehmer TK, Gundlapalli AV, Bentley W, Datta SD, Danner RL, Demirkale CY, Warner S. Association Between Caseload Surge and COVID-19 Survival in 558 U.S. Hospitals, March to August 2020. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174:1240-1251. [PMID: 34224257 PMCID: PMC8276718 DOI: 10.7326/m21-1213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several U.S. hospitals had surges in COVID-19 caseload, but their effect on COVID-19 survival rates remains unclear, especially independent of temporal changes in survival. OBJECTIVE To determine the association between hospitals' severity-weighted COVID-19 caseload and COVID-19 mortality risk and identify effect modifiers of this relationship. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04688372). SETTING 558 U.S. hospitals in the Premier Healthcare Database. PARTICIPANTS Adult COVID-19-coded inpatients admitted from March to August 2020 with discharge dispositions by October 2020. MEASUREMENTS Each hospital-month was stratified by percentile rank on a surge index (a severity-weighted measure of COVID-19 caseload relative to pre-COVID-19 bed capacity). The effect of surge index on risk-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice was calculated using hierarchical modeling; interaction by surge attributes was assessed. RESULTS Of 144 116 inpatients with COVID-19 at 558 U.S. hospitals, 78 144 (54.2%) were admitted to hospitals in the top surge index decile. Overall, 25 344 (17.6%) died; crude COVID-19 mortality decreased over time across all surge index strata. However, compared with nonsurging (<50th surge index percentile) hospital-months, aORs in the 50th to 75th, 75th to 90th, 90th to 95th, 95th to 99th, and greater than 99th percentiles were 1.11 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.23), 1.24 (CI, 1.12 to 1.38), 1.42 (CI, 1.27 to 1.60), 1.59 (CI, 1.41 to 1.80), and 2.00 (CI, 1.69 to 2.38), respectively. The surge index was associated with mortality across ward, intensive care unit, and intubated patients. The surge-mortality relationship was stronger in June to August than in March to May (slope difference, 0.10 [CI, 0.033 to 0.16]) despite greater corticosteroid use and more judicious intubation during later and higher-surging months. Nearly 1 in 4 COVID-19 deaths (5868 [CI, 3584 to 8171]; 23.2%) was potentially attributable to hospitals strained by surging caseload. LIMITATION Residual confounding. CONCLUSION Despite improvements in COVID-19 survival between March and August 2020, surges in hospital COVID-19 caseload remained detrimental to survival and potentially eroded benefits gained from emerging treatments. Bolstering preventive measures and supporting surging hospitals will save many lives. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer S Kadri
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| | - Junfeng Sun
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| | - Alexander Lawandi
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| | - Jeffrey R Strich
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, and U.S. Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland (J.R.S.)
| | - Lindsay M Busch
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, and Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (L.M.B.)
| | - Michael Keller
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| | - Ahmed Babiker
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (A.B.)
| | - Christina Yek
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| | - Seidu Malik
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| | - Janell Krack
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| | - John P Dekker
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland (J.P.D., E.R.)
| | - Alicen B Spaulding
- Children's Minnesota Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota (A.B.S.)
| | - Emily Ricotta
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland (J.P.D., E.R.)
| | - John H Powers
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland (J.H.P.)
| | - Chanu Rhee
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (C.R., M.K.)
| | - Michael Klompas
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (C.R., M.K.)
| | - Janhavi Athale
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, and Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona (J.A.)
| | - Tegan K Boehmer
- U.S. Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (T.K.B.)
| | - Adi V Gundlapalli
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (A.V.G., S.D.D.)
| | - William Bentley
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, and General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, Virginia (W.B.)
| | - S Deblina Datta
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (A.V.G., S.D.D.)
| | - Robert L Danner
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| | - Cumhur Y Demirkale
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| | - Sarah Warner
- National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (S.S.K., J.S., A.L., M.K., C.Y., S.M., J.K., R.L.D., C.Y.D., S.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Teigell Muñoz FJ, García-Guijarro E, García-Domingo P, Pérez-Nieto G, Roque Rojas F, García-Peña M, Nieto Gallo MA, Melero Bermejo JA, de Guzman García-Monge MT, Granizo JJ. A safe protocol to identify low-risk patients with COVID-19 pneumonia for outpatient management. Intern Emerg Med 2021; 16:1663-1671. [PMID: 33620681 PMCID: PMC7900647 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02660-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has made it necessary to rationalize health-care resources, but there is little published data at this moment regarding ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of a protocol for ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia regarding readmissions, admission into the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and deaths. Also, to identify unfavorable prognostic factors that increase the risk of readmission. This is a prospective cohort study of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia discharged from the emergency ward of Infanta Cristina Hospital (Madrid, Spain) that met the criteria of the hospital protocol for outpatient management. We describe outcomes of those patients and compare those who needed readmission versus those who did not. We use logistic regression to explore factors associated with readmissions. A total of 314 patients were included, of which 20 (6.4%) needed readmission, and none needed ICU admission nor died. At least one comorbidity was present in 29.9% of patients. Hypertension, leukopenia, lymphocytopenia, increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and increased aminotransferases were all associated with a higher risk of readmission. A clinical course of 10 days or longer, and an absolute eosinophil count over 200/µL were associated with a lower risk. After the multivariate analysis, only hypertension (OR 4.99, CI 1.54-16.02), temperature over 38 °C in the emergency ward (OR 9.03, CI 1.89-45.77), leukopenia (OR 4.92, CI 1.42-17.11) and increased LDH (OR 6.62, CI 2.82-19.26) remained significantly associated with readmission. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk COVID-19 pneumonia is safe, if adequately selected. The protocol presented here has allowed avoiding 30% of the admissions for COVID-19 pneumonia in our hospital, with a very low readmission rate and no mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Javier Teigell Muñoz
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Elena García-Guijarro
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paula García-Domingo
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Guadalupe Pérez-Nieto
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Roque Rojas
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - María García-Peña
- Department of Pathology, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - José Antonio Melero Bermejo
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Teresa de Guzman García-Monge
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan José Granizo
- Preventive Medicine Unit, Infanta Cristina University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Institute of Investigations Puerta de Hierro-Segovia de Arana, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wilde H, Mellan T, Hawryluk I, Dennis JM, Denaxas S, Pagel C, Duncan A, Bhatt S, Flaxman S, Mateen BA, Vollmer SJ. The association between mechanical ventilator compatible bed occupancy and mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19: a national retrospective cohort study. BMC Med 2021; 19:213. [PMID: 34461893 PMCID: PMC8404408 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02096-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The literature paints a complex picture of the association between mortality risk and ICU strain. In this study, we sought to determine if there is an association between mortality risk in intensive care units (ICU) and occupancy of beds compatible with mechanical ventilation, as a proxy for strain. METHODS A national retrospective observational cohort study of 89 English hospital trusts (i.e. groups of hospitals functioning as single operational units). Seven thousand one hundred thirty-three adults admitted to an ICU in England between 2 April and 1 December, 2020 (inclusive), with presumed or confirmed COVID-19, for whom data was submitted to the national surveillance programme and met study inclusion criteria. A Bayesian hierarchical approach was used to model the association between hospital trust level (mechanical ventilation compatible), bed occupancy, and in-hospital all-cause mortality. Results were adjusted for unit characteristics (pre-pandemic size), individual patient-level demographic characteristics (age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation index, time-to-ICU admission), and recorded chronic comorbidities (obesity, diabetes, respiratory disease, liver disease, heart disease, hypertension, immunosuppression, neurological disease, renal disease). RESULTS One hundred thirty-five thousand six hundred patient days were observed, with a mortality rate of 19.4 per 1000 patient days. Adjusting for patient-level factors, mortality was higher for admissions during periods of high occupancy (> 85% occupancy versus the baseline of 45 to 85%) [OR 1.23 (95% posterior credible interval (PCI): 1.08 to 1.39)]. In contrast, mortality was decreased for admissions during periods of low occupancy (< 45% relative to the baseline) [OR 0.83 (95% PCI 0.75 to 0.94)]. CONCLUSION Increasing occupancy of beds compatible with mechanical ventilation, a proxy for operational strain, is associated with a higher mortality risk for individuals admitted to ICU. Further research is required to establish if this is a causal relationship or whether it reflects strain on other operational factors such as staff. If causal, the result highlights the importance of strategies to keep ICU occupancy low to mitigate the impact of this type of resource saturation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harrison Wilde
- Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Thomas Mellan
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics (J-IDEA), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Iwona Hawryluk
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics (J-IDEA), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - John M Dennis
- Institute of Biomedical & Clinical Science, RILD Building, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, University of Exeter Medical School, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- The Alan Turing Institute, British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
- Health Data Research UK, Gibbs Building, 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, UK
| | - Christina Pagel
- Clinical Operational Research Unit, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Andrew Duncan
- The Alan Turing Institute, British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB, UK
- Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London, London, UK
| | - Samir Bhatt
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics (J-IDEA), Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Seth Flaxman
- Department of Mathematics, Imperial College, London, London, UK
| | - Bilal A Mateen
- The Alan Turing Institute, British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB, UK.
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, 222 Euston Rd, London, London, NW1 2DA, UK.
- The Wellcome Trust, Gibbs Building, 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, UK.
| | - Sebastian J Vollmer
- Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
- The Alan Turing Institute, British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lagrotteria A, Swinton M, Simon J, King S, Boryski G, Ma IWY, Dunne F, Singh J, Bernacki RE, You JJ. Clinicians' Perspectives After Implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program: A Qualitative Study. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2121517. [PMID: 34406399 PMCID: PMC8374609 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Discussions about goals of care with patients who are seriously ill typically occur infrequently and late in the illness trajectory, are of low quality, and focus narrowly on the patient's resuscitation preferences (ie, code status), risking provision of care that is inconsistent with patients' values. The Serious Illness Care Program (SICP) is a multifaceted communication intervention that builds capacity for clinicians to have earlier, more frequent, and more person-centered conversations. OBJECTIVE To explore clinicians' experiences with the SICP 1 year after implementation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study was conducted at 2 tertiary care hospitals in Canada. The SICP was implemented at Hamilton General Hospital (Hamilton, Ontario) from March 1, 2017, to January 19, 2018, and at Foothills Medical Centre (Calgary, Alberta) from March 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. A total of 45 clinicians were invited to participate in the study, and 23 clinicians (51.1%) were enrolled and interviewed. Semistructured interviews of clinicians were conducted between August 2018 and May 2019. Content analysis was used to evaluate information obtained from these interviews between May 2019 and May 2020. EXPOSURES The SICP includes clinician training, communication tools, and processes for system change. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Clinicians' experiences with and perceptions of the SICP. RESULTS Among 23 clinicians interviewed, 15 (65.2%) were women. The mean (SD) number of years in practice was 14.6 (9.1) at the Hamilton site and 12.0 (6.9) at the Calgary site. Participants included 19 general internists, 3 nurse practitioners, and 1 social worker. The 3 main themes were the ways in which the SICP (1) supported changes in clinician behavior, (2) shifted the focus of goals-of-care conversations beyond discussion of code status, and (3) influenced clinicians personally and professionally. Changes in clinician behavior were supported by having a unit champion, interprofessional engagement, access to copies of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, and documentation in the electronic medical record. Elements of the program, especially the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, shifted the focus of goals-of-care conversations beyond discussion of code status and influenced clinicians on personal and professional levels. Concerns with the program included finding time to have conversations, building transient relationships, and limiting conversation fluidity. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this qualitative study, hospital clinicians described components of the SICP as supporting changes in their behavior and facilitating meaningful patient interactions that shifted the focus of goals-of-care conversations beyond discussion of code status. The perceived benefits of SICP implementation stimulated uptake within the medical units. These findings suggest that the SICP may prompt hospital culture changes in goals-of-care dialogue with patients and the care of hospitalized patients with serious illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Lagrotteria
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marilyn Swinton
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica Simon
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Seema King
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Irene Wai Yan Ma
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fiona Dunne
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Japteg Singh
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachelle E. Bernacki
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John J. You
- Division of General Internal and Hospitalist Medicine, Department of Medicine, Trillium Health Partners, Credit Valley Hospital, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Alderden J, Cadavero A, Dougherty D, Jung SH, Yap T. Subsequent Pressure Injury Development in Mechanically Ventilated Critical Care Patients with Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Adv Skin Wound Care 2021; 34:412-416. [PMID: 34081637 PMCID: PMC8716002 DOI: 10.1097/01.asw.0000752700.00049.b5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors associated with subsequent hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPrI) formation among patients in surgical and cardiovascular surgical ICUs with an initial HAPrI. METHODS Patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center and academic medical center in the Western US between 2014 and 2018 were eligible for this retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were development of an HAPrI stage 2 or above, age older than 18 years, the use of mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours, and documentation of a risk-based HAPrI-prevention plan including repositioning at least every 2 hours. The primary outcome measure was development of a second, subsequent HAPrI stage 2 or higher. Potential predictor variables included demographic factors, shock, Charleston comorbidity score, blood gas and laboratory values, surgical factors, vasopressor infusions, levels of sedation or agitation, Braden Scale scores, and nursing skin assessment data. RESULTS The final sample consisted of 226 patients. Among those, 77 (34%) developed a second HAPrI. Independent risk factors for subsequent HAPrI formation were decreased hemoglobin (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.92; P < .000), vasopressin infusion (odds ratio, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.17-4.26; P = .02), and longer length of stay in the ICU (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS Patients with an HAPrI are at high risk of subsequent HAPrI development. Anemia, vasopressin infusion, and longer ICU stays are independent risk factors for repeat HAPrI formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Alderden
- University of Utah college of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | - Se-Hee Jung
- University of Utah college of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Tracey Yap
- Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sidebotham D, Popovich I, Lumley T. A Bayesian analysis of mortality outcomes in multicentre clinical trials in critical care. Br J Anaesth 2021; 127:487-494. [PMID: 34275603 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multicentre RCTs are widely used by critical care researchers to answer important clinical questions. However, few trials evaluating mortality outcomes report statistically significant results. We hypothesised that the low proportion of trials reporting statistically significant differences for mortality outcomes is plausibly explained by lower-than-expected effect sizes combined with a low proportion of participants who could realistically benefit from studied interventions. METHODS We reviewed multicentre trials in critical care published over a 10-yr period in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association, and the Lancet. To test our hypothesis, we analysed the results using a Bayesian model to investigate the relationship between the proportion of effective interventions and the proportion of statistically significant results for prior distributions of effect size and trial participant susceptibility. RESULTS Five of 54 trials (9.3%) reported a significant difference in mortality between the control and the intervention groups. The median expected and observed differences in absolute mortality were 8.0% and 2.0%, respectively. Our modelling shows that, across trials, a lower-than-expected effect size combined with a low proportion of potentially susceptible participants is consistent with the observed proportion of trials reporting significant differences even when most interventions are effective. CONCLUSIONS When designing clinical trials, researchers most likely overestimate true population effect sizes for critical care interventions. Bayesian modelling demonstrates that that it is not necessarily the case that most studied interventions lack efficacy. In fact, it is plausible that many studied interventions have clinically important effects that are missed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Sidebotham
- Department of Anaesthesia, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Ivor Popovich
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Thomas Lumley
- Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Yates T, Zaccardi F, Islam N, Razieh C, Gillies CL, Lawson CA, Chudasama Y, Rowlands A, Davies MJ, Docherty AB, Openshaw PJM, Baillie JK, Semple MG, Khunti K. Obesity, Ethnicity, and Risk of Critical Care, Mechanical Ventilation, and Mortality in Patients Admitted to Hospital with COVID-19: Analysis of the ISARIC CCP-UK Cohort. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2021; 29:1223-1230. [PMID: 33755331 PMCID: PMC8251439 DOI: 10.1002/oby.23178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the association of obesity with in-hospital coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes in different ethnic groups. METHODS Patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 in the United Kingdom through the Clinical Characterisation Protocol UK (CCP-UK) developed by the International Severe Acute Respiratory and emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) were included from February 6 to October 12, 2020. Ethnicity was classified as White, South Asian, Black, and other minority ethnic groups. Outcomes were admission to critical care, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality, adjusted for age, sex, and chronic diseases. RESULTS Of the participants included, 54,254 (age = 76 years; 45.0% women) were White, 3,728 (57 years; 41.1% women) were South Asian, 2,523 (58 years; 44.9% women) were Black, and 5,427 (61 years; 40.8% women) were other ethnicities. Obesity was associated with all outcomes in all ethnic groups, with associations strongest for black ethnicities. When stratified by ethnicity and obesity status, the odds ratios for admission to critical care, mechanical ventilation, and mortality in black ethnicities with obesity were 3.91 (3.13-4.88), 5.03 (3.94-6.63), and 1.93 (1.49-2.51), respectively, compared with White ethnicities without obesity. CONCLUSIONS Obesity was associated with an elevated risk of in-hospital COVID-19 outcomes in all ethnic groups, with associations strongest in Black ethnicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Yates
- Diabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicester General HospitalLeicesterUK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and University of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Francesco Zaccardi
- Diabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicester General HospitalLeicesterUK
- Leicester Real World Evidence UnitDiabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Nazrul Islam
- Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU)Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Medical Research Council Epidemiology UnitUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Cameron Razieh
- Diabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicester General HospitalLeicesterUK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and University of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Clare L. Gillies
- Diabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicester General HospitalLeicesterUK
- Leicester Real World Evidence UnitDiabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Claire A. Lawson
- Diabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicester General HospitalLeicesterUK
| | - Yogini Chudasama
- Leicester Real World Evidence UnitDiabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Alex Rowlands
- Diabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicester General HospitalLeicesterUK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and University of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Melanie J. Davies
- Diabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicester General HospitalLeicesterUK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC)University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and University of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - Annemarie B. Docherty
- Centre for Medical InformaticsUsher InstituteUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
- Intensive Care UnitRoyal Infirmary EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | | | - Malcolm G. Semple
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections and Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
- Respiratory MedicineAlder Hey Children’s HospitalInstitute in The ParkUniversity of LiverpoolAlder Hey Children’s HospitalLiverpoolUK
| | | | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicester General HospitalLeicesterUK
- Leicester Real World Evidence UnitDiabetes Research CentreUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration – East Midlands (ARC‐EM)University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust and University of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dotan M, Zion E, Ben-Zvi H, Yarden-Bilavsky H, Bilavsky E. Adenovirus Infection in Children with Down Syndrome. Isr Med Assoc J 2021; 23:416-419. [PMID: 34251123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adenovirus infections are prevalent in children. They usually cause a mild self-limited disease. However, this infection can be associated with considerable morbidity and mortality in specific populations, especially among immunocompromised children. Children with Down syndrome are susceptible to a higher frequency and increased severity of viral infections. Little is known about the severity and clinical course of adenovirus infections in children with Down syndrome. OBJECTIVES To characterize hospitalized children diagnosed with Down syndrome and presenting with adenovirus infection. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of children admitted with adenovirus from January 2005 to August 2014 from a single tertiary pediatric medical center in Israel. Data were compared between patients with and without Down syndrome. RESULTS Among the 486 hospitalized children with adenoviral infection, 11 (2.28%) were diagnosed with Down syndrome. We found that children with Down syndrome were more likely to experience a higher incidence of complications (18.2% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.008), a higher rate of admissions to the intensive care unit (36.4% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.001), and more prolonged hospitalizations (17 ± 15.9 days compared to 4.46 ± 3.16, P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Children with Down syndrome who were hospitalized with adenovirus infection represent a high-risk group and warrant close monitoring. If a vaccine for adenovirus becomes available, children with Down syndrome should be considered as candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miri Dotan
- Department of Pediatrics C, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Elena Zion
- Department of Pediatrics A, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Haim Ben-Zvi
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rabin Medical Center (Beillinson Campus), Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Havatzelet Yarden-Bilavsky
- Department of Pediatrics A, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Efraim Bilavsky
- Department of Pediatrics C, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mousavi Movahed SM, Akhavizadegan H, Dolatkhani F, Nejadghaderi SA, Aghajani F, Faghir Gangi M, Ghazi Z, Ghasemi H. Different incidences of acute kidney injury (AKI) and outcomes in COVID-19 patients with and without non-azithromycin antibiotics: A retrospective study. J Med Virol 2021; 93:4411-4419. [PMID: 33792956 PMCID: PMC8251081 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
In late December 2019, an outbreak of a novel coronavirus which caused coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was initiated. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was associated with higher severity and mortality of COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the effects of comorbidities and medications in addition to determining the association between AKI, antibiotics against coinfections (AAC) and outcomes of patients. We conducted a retrospective study on adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in a tertiary center. Our primary outcomes were the incidence rate of AKI based on comorbidities and medications. The secondary outcome was to determine mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and prolonged hospitalization by AKI and AAC. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression method was used to explore predictive effects of AKI and AAC on outcomes. Out of 854 included participants, 118 patients developed AKI in whom, 57 used AAC and 61 did not. Hypertension and diabetes were the most common comorbidities in patients developed AKI. AAC, lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, and corticosteroids had significant higher rate of administration in patients developed AKI. AAC were associated with higher deaths (odds ratio [OR] = 5.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3-8.78) and ICU admission (OR = 5.87; 95%CI: 2.81-12.27), while AKI had higher OR for prolonged hospitalization (3.37; 95%CI: 1.76-6.45). Both AKI and AAC are associated with poor prognosis of COVID-19. Defining strict criteria regarding indications and types of antibiotics would help overcoming concomitant infections and minimizing related adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hamed Akhavizadegan
- Department of Urology, Baharloo HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Fatemeh Dolatkhani
- Department of Nephrology, Baharloo HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi
- School of MedicineShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
- Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis Expert Group (SRMEG)Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN)TehranIran
| | - Faezeh Aghajani
- School of MedicineTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Monireh Faghir Gangi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public HealthTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Zahra Ghazi
- Baharloo HospitalTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Hoomaan Ghasemi
- School of MedicineTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Taneja SL, Passi M, Bhattacharya S, Schueler SA, Gurram S, Koh C. Social Media and Research Publication Activity During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Trend Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e26956. [PMID: 33974550 PMCID: PMC8212965 DOI: 10.2196/26956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of rapid dissemination of scientific and medical discoveries. Current platforms available for the distribution of scientific and clinical research data and information include preprint repositories and traditional peer-reviewed journals. In recent times, social media has emerged as a helpful platform to share scientific and medical discoveries. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to comparatively analyze activity on social media (specifically, Twitter) and that related to publications in the form of preprint and peer-reviewed journal articles in the context of COVID-19 and gastroenterology during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS COVID-19-related data from Twitter (tweets and user data) and articles published in preprint servers (bioRxiv and medRxiv) as well as in the PubMed database were collected and analyzed during the first 6 months of the pandemic, from December 2019 through May 2020. Global and regional geographic and gastrointestinal organ-specific social media trends were compared to preprint and publication activity. Any relationship between Twitter activity and preprint articles published and that between Twitter activity and PubMed articles published overall, by organ system, and by geographic location were identified using Spearman's rank-order correlation. RESULTS Over the 6-month period, 73,079 tweets from 44,609 users, 7164 journal publications, and 4702 preprint publications were retrieved. Twitter activity (ie, number of tweets) peaked in March 2020, whereas preprint and publication activity (ie, number of articles published) peaked in April 2020. Overall, strong correlations were identified between trends in Twitter activity and preprint and publication activity (P<.001 for both). COVID-19 data across the three platforms mainly concentrated on pulmonology or critical care, but when analyzing the field of gastroenterology specifically, most tweets pertained to pancreatology, most publications focused on hepatology, and most preprints covered hepatology and luminal gastroenterology. Furthermore, there were significant positive associations between trends in Twitter and publication activity for all gastroenterology topics (luminal gastroenterology: P=.009; hepatology and inflammatory bowel disease: P=.006; gastrointestinal endoscopy: P=.007), except pancreatology (P=.20), suggesting that Twitter activity did not correlate with publication activity for this topic. Finally, Twitter activity was the highest in the United States (7331 tweets), whereas PubMed activity was the highest in China (1768 publications). CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the potential of social media as a vehicle for disseminating scientific information during a public health crisis. Sharing and spreading information on COVID-19 in a timely manner during the pandemic has been paramount; this was achieved at a much faster pace on social media, particularly on Twitter. Future investigation could demonstrate how social media can be used to augment and promote scholarly activity, especially as the world begins to increasingly rely on digital or virtual platforms. Scientists and clinicians should consider the use of social media in augmenting public awareness regarding their scholarly pursuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia L Taneja
- National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Digestive Disease Branch, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Monica Passi
- National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Digestive Disease Branch, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Sumona Bhattacharya
- National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Digestive Disease Branch, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Samuel A Schueler
- National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Digestive Disease Branch, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Sandeep Gurram
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Christopher Koh
- Liver Diseases Branch, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gutmann C, Takov K, Burnap SA, Singh B, Ali H, Theofilatos K, Reed E, Hasman M, Nabeebaccus A, Fish M, McPhail MJ, O'Gallagher K, Schmidt LE, Cassel C, Rienks M, Yin X, Auzinger G, Napoli S, Mujib SF, Trovato F, Sanderson B, Merrick B, Niazi U, Saqi M, Dimitrakopoulou K, Fernández-Leiro R, Braun S, Kronstein-Wiedemann R, Doores KJ, Edgeworth JD, Shah AM, Bornstein SR, Tonn T, Hayday AC, Giacca M, Shankar-Hari M, Mayr M. SARS-CoV-2 RNAemia and proteomic trajectories inform prognostication in COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care. Nat Commun 2021; 12:3406. [PMID: 34099652 PMCID: PMC8184784 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23494-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Prognostic characteristics inform risk stratification in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We obtained blood samples (n = 474) from hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 123), non-COVID-19 ICU sepsis patients (n = 25) and healthy controls (n = 30). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA was detected in plasma or serum (RNAemia) of COVID-19 ICU patients when neutralizing antibody response was low. RNAemia is associated with higher 28-day ICU mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84 [95% CI, 1.22-2.77] adjusted for age and sex). RNAemia is comparable in performance to the best protein predictors. Mannose binding lectin 2 and pentraxin-3 (PTX3), two activators of the complement pathway of the innate immune system, are positively associated with mortality. Machine learning identified 'Age, RNAemia' and 'Age, PTX3' as the best binary signatures associated with 28-day ICU mortality. In longitudinal comparisons, COVID-19 ICU patients have a distinct proteomic trajectory associated with mortality, with recovery of many liver-derived proteins indicating survival. Finally, proteins of the complement system and galectin-3-binding protein (LGALS3BP) are identified as interaction partners of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. LGALS3BP overexpression inhibits spike-pseudoparticle uptake and spike-induced cell-cell fusion in vitro.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Gutmann
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Kaloyan Takov
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Sean A Burnap
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Bhawana Singh
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Hashim Ali
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Konstantinos Theofilatos
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Ella Reed
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Maria Hasman
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Adam Nabeebaccus
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Fish
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Jw McPhail
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kevin O'Gallagher
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lukas E Schmidt
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Christian Cassel
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Marieke Rienks
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Xiaoke Yin
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Georg Auzinger
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Salvatore Napoli
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Salma F Mujib
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Francesca Trovato
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Barnaby Sanderson
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Blair Merrick
- Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research group, Department of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Umar Niazi
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mansoor Saqi
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Konstantina Dimitrakopoulou
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rafael Fernández-Leiro
- Structural Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Silke Braun
- Medical Clinic I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Romy Kronstein-Wiedemann
- Experimental Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Katie J Doores
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D Edgeworth
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research group, Department of Infection, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ajay M Shah
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stefan R Bornstein
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Diabetes, School of Life Course Science and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Torsten Tonn
- Experimental Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, German Red Cross Blood Donation Service North East, Dresden, Germany
| | - Adrian C Hayday
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Mauro Giacca
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK
| | - Manu Shankar-Hari
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Manuel Mayr
- King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, London, UK.
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Roberts T, Daniels J, Hulme W, Hirst R, Horner D, Lyttle MD, Samuel K, Graham B, Reynard C, Barrett M, Foley J, Cronin J, Umana E, Vinagre J, Carlton E. Psychological distress during the acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of doctors practising in emergency medicine, anaesthesia and intensive care medicine in the UK and Ireland. Emerg Med J 2021; 38:450-459. [PMID: 33832926 PMCID: PMC8042593 DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify psychological distress experienced by emergency, anaesthetic and intensive care doctors during the acceleration phase of COVID-19 in the UK and Ireland. METHODS Initial cross-sectional electronic survey distributed during acceleration phase of the first pandemic wave of COVID-19 in the UK and Ireland (UK: 18 March 2020-26 March 2020 and Ireland: 25 March 2020-2 April 2020). Surveys were distributed via established specialty research networks, within a three-part longitudinal study. Participants were doctors working in emergency, anaesthetic and intensive medicine during the first pandemic wave of COVID-19 in acute hospitals across the UK and Ireland. Primary outcome measures were the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). Additional questions examined personal and professional characteristics, experiences of COVID-19 to date, risk to self and others and self-reported perceptions of health and well-being. RESULTS 5440 responses were obtained, 54.3% (n=2955) from emergency medicine and 36.9% (n=2005) from anaesthetics. All levels of doctor seniority were represented. For the primary outcome of GHQ-12 score, 44.2% (n=2405) of respondents scored >3, meeting the criteria for psychological distress. 57.3% (n=3045) had never previously provided clinical care during an infectious disease outbreak but over half of respondents felt somewhat prepared (48.6%, n=2653) or very prepared (7.6%, n=416) to provide clinical care to patients with COVID-19. However, 81.1% (n=4414) either agreed (31.1%, n=2709) or strongly agreed (31.1%, n=1705) that their personal health was at risk due to their clinical role. CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate that during the acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost half of frontline doctors working in acute care reported psychological distress as measured by the GHQ-12. Findings from this study should inform strategies to optimise preparedness and explore modifiable factors associated with increased psychological distress in the short and long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN10666798.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Roberts
- TERN, Royal College of Emergency Medicine, London, UK
- Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
| | - Jo Daniels
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, UK
| | | | - Robert Hirst
- Department of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Daniel Horner
- TERN, Royal College of Emergency Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Intensive Care and Emergency Department, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Mark D Lyttle
- Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
- UWE Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, Bristol, UK
| | - Katie Samuel
- Department of Anaesthesia, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK
| | - Blair Graham
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth, UK
- Emergency Department, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Charlie Reynard
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Barrett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - James Foley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland
| | - John Cronin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, St Vincents University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Etimbuk Umana
- Emergency Department, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joao Vinagre
- College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Edward Carlton
- Emergency Department, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK
- School of Health and Social Care, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with pulmonary embolism in adults, but the clinical circumstances surrounding its presence are unknown in children. The objectives of this study are to determine the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in pediatric subjects with COVID-19, evaluate patient characteristics, and describe treatments applied. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX electronic health record data of subjects aged <18 years who were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, code U07.1). Pulmonary embolism was identified by using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, code I26. We additionally collected data on age, sex, race, ethnicity, all diagnostic codes, medications, procedures, laboratory results, comorbidities, and outcomes. RESULTS During the study period, 24 723 pediatric subjects were reported to have a COVID-19 infection diagnosis among 41 health care organizations, of which 693 (2.8%) were hospitalized. Eight subjects (0.03% overall and 1.2% of hospitalized patients) were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism. The median age (25th to 75th percentile) of patients diagnosed with pulmonary embolism was 16.5 years, and median (25th to 75th percentile) BMI was 22.1 (19.6-47.9). Three (37.5%) received critical care services, and 1 (12.5%) underwent mechanical ventilation. Five (62.5%) subjects had potentially significant risk factors (obesity, malignancy, recent surgery, and oral contraceptive use). All patients received anticoagulation, but none underwent thrombolysis. There were no reported deaths. CONCLUSIONS Although pulmonary embolism is diagnosed less commonly in children than in adults, its occurrence appears to be more frequent in children hospitalized with COVID-19, as compared with previous reports in hospitalized children in general. All patients survived, with only 1 requiring mechanical ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Duane Williams
- Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Neal J Thomas
- Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
- Department of Public Health Sciences Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Conrad Krawiec
- Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Berni A, Malandrino D, Corona G, Maggi M, Parenti G, Fibbi B, Poggesi L, Bartoloni A, Lavorini F, Fanelli A, Scocchera G, Nozzoli C, Peris A, Pieralli F, Pini R, Ungar A, Peri A. Serum sodium alterations in SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection: impact on patient outcome. Eur J Endocrinol 2021; 185:137-144. [PMID: 33950864 PMCID: PMC9494309 DOI: 10.1530/eje-20-1447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder in hospitalized patients and occurs in about 30% of patients with pneumonia. Hyponatremia has been associated with a worse outcome in several pathologic conditions The main objective of this study was to determine whether serum sodium alterations may be independent predictors of the outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. DESIGN AND METHODS In this observational study, data from 441 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to a University Hospital were collected. After excluding 61 patients (no serum sodium at admission available, saline solution infusion before sodium assessment, transfer from another hospital), data from 380 patients were analyzed. RESULTS 274 (72.1%) patients had normonatremia at admission, 87 (22.9%) patients had hyponatremia and 19 (5%) patients had hypernatremia. We found an inverse correlation between serum sodium and IL-6, whereas a direct correlation between serum sodium and PaO2/FiO2 ratio was observed. Patients with hyponatremia had a higher prevalence of non-invasive ventilation and ICU transfer than those with normonatremia or hypernatremia. Hyponatremia was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (2.7-fold increase vs normonatremia) and each mEq/L of serum sodium reduction was associated with a 14.4% increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that serum sodium at admission may be considered as an early prognostic marker of disease severity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Berni
- Internal Medicine Unit 3, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Danilo Malandrino
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giovanni Corona
- Endocrinology Unit, Medical Department, Azienda Usl Bologna Maggiore-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mario Maggi
- Endocrinology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences ‘Mario Serio’, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Parenti
- Endocrinology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Pituitary Diseases and Sodium Alterations Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Benedetta Fibbi
- Endocrinology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Pituitary Diseases and Sodium Alterations Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Loredana Poggesi
- Internal Medicine Unit 3, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bartoloni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Federico Lavorini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Pneumology and Thoraco Pulmonary Pathophysiology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Fanelli
- Internal Medicine Unit 2, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Scocchera
- Internal Medicine Unit 2, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Nozzoli
- Internal Medicine Unit 1, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Adriano Peris
- Intensive Care Unit and Regional ECMO Referral Center, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Filippo Pieralli
- High Intensity Internal Medicine Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Pini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Internal and Emergency Medicine, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Ungar
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Geriatric-UTIG Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Peri
- Endocrinology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences ‘Mario Serio’, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Pituitary Diseases and Sodium Alterations Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- Correspondence should be addressed to A Peri Email
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Faigle R, Chen BJ, Krieger R, Marsh EB, Alkhachroum A, Xiong W, Urrutia VC, Gottesman RF. Novel Score for Stratifying Risk of Critical Care Needs in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurology 2021; 96:e2458-e2468. [PMID: 33790039 PMCID: PMC8205477 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a risk prediction score identifying patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at low risk for critical care. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data of 451 patients with ICH between 2010 and 2018. The sample was randomly divided into a development and a validation cohort. Logistic regression was used to develop a risk score by weighting independent predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) needs according to strength of association. The risk score was tested in the validation cohort and externally validated in a dataset from another institution. RESULTS The rate of ICU interventions was 80.3%. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and ICH volume were independent predictors of critical care, resulting in the following point assignments for the Intensive Care Triaging in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage (INTRINSIC) score: SBP 160 to 190 mm Hg (1 point), SBP >190 mm Hg (3 points); GCS 8 to 13 (1 point), GCS <8 (3 points); ICH volume 16 to 40 cm3 (1 point), ICH volume >40 cm3 (2 points); and presence of IVH (1 point), with values ranging between 0 and 9. Among patients with a score of 0 and no ICU needs during their emergency department stay, 93.6% remained without critical care needs. In an external validation cohort of patients with ICH, the INTRINSIC score achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.823 (95% confidence interval 0.782-0.863). A score <2 predicted the absence of critical care needs with 48.5% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity, and a score <3 predicted the absence of critical care needs with 61.7% sensitivity and 83.0% specificity. CONCLUSION The INTRINSIC score identifies patients with ICH who are at low risk for critical care interventions. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that the INTRINSIC score identifies patients with ICH at low risk for critical care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Faigle
- From the Department of Neurology (R.F., B.J.C., R.K., E.B.M., V.C.U., R.F.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.A.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Health System, FL; and Department of Neurology (W.X.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH.
| | - Bridget J Chen
- From the Department of Neurology (R.F., B.J.C., R.K., E.B.M., V.C.U., R.F.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.A.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Health System, FL; and Department of Neurology (W.X.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH
| | - Rachel Krieger
- From the Department of Neurology (R.F., B.J.C., R.K., E.B.M., V.C.U., R.F.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.A.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Health System, FL; and Department of Neurology (W.X.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH
| | - Elisabeth B Marsh
- From the Department of Neurology (R.F., B.J.C., R.K., E.B.M., V.C.U., R.F.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.A.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Health System, FL; and Department of Neurology (W.X.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH
| | - Ayham Alkhachroum
- From the Department of Neurology (R.F., B.J.C., R.K., E.B.M., V.C.U., R.F.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.A.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Health System, FL; and Department of Neurology (W.X.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH
| | - Wei Xiong
- From the Department of Neurology (R.F., B.J.C., R.K., E.B.M., V.C.U., R.F.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.A.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Health System, FL; and Department of Neurology (W.X.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH
| | - Victor C Urrutia
- From the Department of Neurology (R.F., B.J.C., R.K., E.B.M., V.C.U., R.F.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.A.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Health System, FL; and Department of Neurology (W.X.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH
| | - Rebecca F Gottesman
- From the Department of Neurology (R.F., B.J.C., R.K., E.B.M., V.C.U., R.F.G.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurology (A.A.), University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Health System, FL; and Department of Neurology (W.X.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients initially present with early oxygen demand, requiring more medical resources, and some develop severe conditions, while others worsen later in their clinical course. Whether the nature of the two groups is the same but in the spectrum of different diagnostic time points is not certain. METHODS Hospitalized COVID-19 patients who needed oxygen therapy from February to November 2020 were included in the study. The patients were divided into early and late groups based on the time when the oxygen requirement occurred. Basic and epidemiologic characteristics were compared. Clinical variables were analyzed in both groups. RESULTS A total of 164 patients needed oxygen therapy, 94 of whom were in the early group and 70 of whom were in the late group. The early and late groups had similar baseline characteristics except age (median age, 73 vs. 67 years), uncertain exposure history (50% vs. 31.4%) and the time from the onset of illness to admission (median, 5 vs. 2 days). Multivariate analysis showed that age > 65 years (OR, 4.65), symptom onset > 5 days (OR, 9.13) and several clinical manifestations, such as febrile sensation (OR, 6.01), dyspnea (OR, 30.0), C-reactive protein > 1 mg/dL (OR, 7.87) and chest X-ray abnormality (OR, 8.15), were predictive factors in the early group. The early group required more intensive care such as mechanical ventilation care, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and death (29.8% vs. 14.3%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Older age, especially > 65 years, and a delay of over 5 days from the onset of illness to admission were associated with early oxygen demand in COVID-19 patients. Interventions for earlier diagnosis of elderly people may benefit clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeon Jeong Suh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunyoung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Won Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kartsios C, Lokare A, Osman H, Perrin D, Razaq S, Ayub N, Daddar B, Fair S. Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 positive patients: a role for direct anticoagulants? J Thromb Thrombolysis 2021; 51:947-952. [PMID: 32910408 PMCID: PMC7481340 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-020-02257-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications due to systemic coagulation activation. Little is known about the role of direct anticoagulants (DOACs) in COVID-19 related thrombosis. In this audit we sought to distinguish COVID-19 hospitalised patients with a diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and record their outcomes over a period of 3 months (01/02/2020–30/04/2020). A total of 1583 patients were diagnosed with laboratory proven COVID-19 disease. Amongst them, 38 patients (0.82%) suffered VTE (median age 68 years, male/female: 20/18). VTE was the presenting symptom on admission in 71%. Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 92% of patients; 5 patients required intensive care and 3 underwent thrombolysis. 27 patients received initial treatment with unfractionated heparin/low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) while 10 were treated with direct anticoagulants (DOACs). After a median follow up of 25 days, 29 (76%) patients were alive while 5 were still hospitalised. Most patients (83%) were discharged on DOACs, no VTE recurrence or bleeding was recorded post-discharge. Our results suggest that direct anticoagulants could be a safe and effective treatment option in selected COVID-19 positive patients who have suffered venous thromboembolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charalampos Kartsios
- Department of Haematology, Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Anand Lokare
- Department of Haematology, Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Husam Osman
- Department of Virology, Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Damian Perrin
- Department of Acute Medicine, Good Hope Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shahzad Razaq
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Namrah Ayub
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby Daddar
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Susan Fair
- Department of Acute Medicine, Good Hope Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Temsah MH, Al-Sohime F, Alhaboob A, Al-Eyadhy A, Aljamaan F, Hasan G, Ali S, Ashri A, Nahass AA, Al-Barrak R, Temsah O, Alhasan K, Jamal AA. Adverse events experienced with intrahospital transfer of critically ill patients: A national survey. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e25810. [PMID: 33950984 PMCID: PMC8104182 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000025810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Research that focuses on transfers to and from the intensive care unit (ICU) could highlight important patients' safety issues. This study aims to describe healthcare workers' (HCWs) practices involved in patient transfers to or from the ICU.This cross-sectional study was conducted among HCWs during the Saudi Critical Care Society's annual International Conference, April 2017. Responses were assessed using Likert scales and frequencies. Bivariate analysis was used to evaluate the significance of different indicators.Overall, 312 HCWs participated in this study. Regarding transfer to ICUs, the most frequently reported complications were deterioration in respiratory status (51.4%), followed by deterioration in hemodynamic status (46.5%), and missing clinical information (35.5%). Regarding transfers from ICUs to the general ward, the most commonly reported complications were changes in respiratory status (55.6%), followed by incomplete clinical information (37.9%), and change in hemodynamic conditions (29%). The most-used models for communicating transfers were written documents in electronic health records (69.3%) and verbal communication (62.8%). One-fourth of the respondents were not aware of the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) method of patients' handover. Pearson's test of correlation showed that the HCW's perceived satisfaction with their hospital transfer guidelines showed significant negative correlation with their reported transfer-related complications (r = -0.27, P < .010).Hemodynamic and respiratory status deterioration is representing significant adverse events among patients transferred to or from the ICU. Factors controlling the perceived satisfaction of HCWs involved in patients, transfer to and from the ICU need to be addressed, focusing on their compliance to the hospital-wide transfer and handover policies. Quality improvement initiatives could improve patient safety to transfer patients to and from the ICU and minimize the associated adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad-Hani Temsah
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department
| | - Fahad Al-Sohime
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department
| | - Ali Alhaboob
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department
| | - Ayman Al-Eyadhy
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department
| | - Fadi Aljamaan
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh
- Critical Care Department, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Gamal Hasan
- Assiut Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
- Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Salma Ali
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department
| | - Ahmed Ashri
- Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department
| | | | | | | | | | - Amr A. Jamal
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh
- Family & Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City
- Evidence-Based Health Care & Knowledge Translation Research Chair, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
McCrum ML, Wan N, Lizotte SL, Han J, Varghese T, Nirula R. Use of the spatial access ratio to measure geospatial access to emergency general surgery services in California. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 90:853-860. [PMID: 33797498 PMCID: PMC8068585 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency general surgery (EGS) encompasses a spectrum of time-sensitive and resource-intensive conditions, which require adequate and timely access to surgical care. Developing metrics to accurately quantify spatial access to care is critical for this field. We sought to evaluate the ability of the spatial access ratio (SPAR), which incorporates travel time, hospital capacity, and population demand in its ability to measure spatial access to EGS care and delineate disparities. METHODS We constructed a geographic information science platform for EGS-capable hospitals in California and mapped population location, race, and socioeconomic characteristics. We compared the SPAR to the shortest travel time model in its ability to identify disparities in spatial access overall and for vulnerable populations. Reduced spatial access was defined as >60 minutes travel time or lowest three classes of SPAR. RESULTS A total of 283 EGS-capable hospitals were identified, of which 142 (50%) had advanced resources. Using shortest travel time, only 166,950 persons (0.4% of total population) experienced prolonged (>60 minutes) travel time to any EGS-capable hospital, which increased to 1.05 million (2.7%) for advanced-resource centers. Using SPAR, 11.5 million (29.5%) had reduced spatial access to any EGS hospital, and 13.9 million (35.7%) for advanced-resource centers. Rural residents had significantly decreased access for both overall and advanced EGS services when assessed by SPAR despite travel times within the 60-minute threshold. CONCLUSION While travel time and SPAR showed similar overall geographic patterns of spatial access to EGS hospitals, SPAR identified a greater a greater proportion of the population as having limited access to care. Nearly one third of California residents experience reduced spatial access to EGS hospitals when assessed by SPAR. Metrics that incorporate measures of population demand and hospital capacity in addition to travel time may be useful when assessing spatial access to surgical services. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Cross-sectional study, level VI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta L McCrum
- From the Department of Surgery (M.L.M., T.V., R.N.), and Department of Geography (N.W., S.L.L., J.H.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Goldstein C, Deisher D, Gorman E, Sheikh F, Sifri Z, Glass NE. Tracheostomy is Safe in Patients with Prolonged Intubation After Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection. J Surg Res 2021; 266:361-365. [PMID: 34087619 PMCID: PMC8075851 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Tracheostomy improves outcomes for critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Data are limited on the use and benefit of tracheostomies for intubated, critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. During the surge in COVID 19 infections in metropolitan New York/New Jersey, our hospital cared for many COVID-19 patients who required prolonged intubation. This study describes the outcomes in COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy. Methods We present a case series of patients with COVID-19 who underwent tracheostomy at a single institution. Tracheostomies were performed on patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation beyond 3 wk. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and ventilator settings prior to tracheostomy were reviewed. Primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included time on mechanical ventilation, length of ICU and hospital stay, and discharge disposition. Results Fifteen COVID-19 patients underwent tracheostomy at an average of 31 d post intubation. Two patients (13%) died. Half of our cohort was liberated from the ventilator (8 patients, 53%), with an average time to liberation of 14 ± 6 d after tracheostomy. Among patients off mechanical ventilation, 5 (63%) had their tracheostomies removed prior to discharge. The average intensive care length of stay was 47 ± 13 d (range 29-74 d) and the average hospital stay was 59 ± 16 d (range 34-103 d). Conclusions This study reports promising outcomes in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure and need for prolonged ventilation who undergo tracheostomy during their hospitalization. Further research is warranted to establish appropriate indications for tracheostomy in COVID-19 and confirm outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carma Goldstein
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - David Deisher
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Elizabeth Gorman
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Fariha Sheikh
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Ziad Sifri
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Nina E Glass
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|