Peripheral intravenous catheter needleless connector decontamination study-Randomized controlled trial

Decontamination methods of needleless connectors in central venous access: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Needleless connectors (NCs) are essential for central venous access but can cause bloodstream infections if contaminated. Currently, inconsistent guidelines on the optimal disinfectant and duration for NCs hinder nursing practice standardization. Notably, 75% ethanol which is widely used in China lacks rigorous comparison with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in ethanol, with existing evidence predominantly from ICU rather than outpatient settings. This study aims to compare the decontamination efficacy of 75% ethanol and 2% CHG in ethanol with scrub durations of 5, 10, and 15 seconds on NCs in outpatients.

METHODS

Using a factorial randomized controlled trial design, 360 NCs from 111 adult cancer patients with central venous access were randomized to six protocols: 75% ethanol or 2% CHG in ethanol, each scrubbed for 5, 10, or 15 seconds. Baseline and post-decontamination samples were collected for microbial culture to assess decontamination efficacy.

RESULTS

Baseline contamination occurred in 80.6% of 356 NCs, with brachial vein catheterization increasing risk (OR=3.12, 95%CI 1.20-8.12) and prolonged indwelling (>6 months) reducing it (OR=0.25, 95%CI 0.07-0.88). No significant difference was observed between 75% ethanol and 2% CHG in ethanol (P>0.05). However, 15-second scrubbing achieved superior efficacy versus 5-second and 10-second protocols (P=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found 75% ethanol equivalent to 2% CHG in ethanol for disinfection, supporting ≥15-second scrubs but noting residual contamination risks. By contextualizing disinfection protocols for outpatient populations and 75% ethanol-based practices, this study provides actionable evidence to standardize scrub durations and optimize resource allocation in diverse clinical settings.

Incidence and risk factors for central venous access device failure in hospitalized adults: A multivariable analysis of 1892 catheters

BACKGROUND

Central venous access devices (CVADs) allow intravenous therapy, haemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling but many fail before therapy completion.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify CVAD failure and complications; and identify risk factors.

DESIGNS, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

Secondary analysis of multicentre randomised controlled trial including patients aged ≥16 years with a non-tunnelled CVAD (NTCVAD), peripherally-inserted central catheter (PICC) or tunnelled CVAD (TCVAD). Primary outcome was incidence of all-cause CVAD failure (central line-associated bloodstream infection [CLABSI], occlusion, accidental dislodgement, catheter fracture, thrombosis, pain). Secondary outcomes were CLABSI, occlusion and dislodgement. Cox regression was used to report time-to-event associations.

RESULTS

In 1892 CVADs, all-cause failure occurred in 10.2% of devices: 49 NTCVADs (6.1%); 100 PICCs (13.2%); 44 TCVADs (13.4%). Failure rates for CLABSI, occlusion and dislodgement were 5.3%, 1.8%, and 1.7%, respectively. Independent CLABSI predictors were blood product administration through PICCs (hazard ratio (HR) 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-5.55); and in TCVADs, one or two lumens, compared with three to four (HR 3.36, 95%CI 1.68-6.71), intravenous chemotherapy (HR 2.96, 95%CI 1.31-6.68), and diabetes (HR 3.25, 95%CI 1.40-7.57). Independent factors protective for CLABSI include antimicrobial NTCVADs (HR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08-0.63) and lipids in TCVADs (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.14-0.72). NTCVADs inserted at another hospital (HR 7.06, 95%CI 1.48-33.7) and baseline infection in patients with PICCs (HR 2.72, 95%CI 1.08-6.83) were predictors for dislodgement. No independent occlusion predictors were found. Modifiable risk factors were identified for CVAD failure, which occurred for 1-in-10 catheters. Strict infection prevention measures and improved CVAD securement could reduce CLABSI and dislodgement risk.

Disinfection of needleless connectors for catheters in one second using a hand-held UV device

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for disinfecting needleless connectors (NCs) of central venous catheters includes alcohol-containing caps or up to a 15-second scrub with alcohol or chlorhexidine. Due to the clinical impact and high cost of treating Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), reducing the incidence of CLABSI is a priority for public health and of the Centers for Disease Control. Alcohol-containing caps have been demonstrated to disinfect external NC surfaces, but not the internal surface. Ultraviolet light (UV-C) is a strategy for disinfection of NC internal and external surfaces.

METHODS

Four clinically relevant bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and Candida albicans were inoculated on NCs. Disinfection efficacy was measured after exposure to one second of 285 nm UV-C light at 48 mW/cm2 in a proprietary handheld device and UV-C transparent NC or standard of care. Disinfection of internal and external surfaces of NC inoculated with S aureus using alcohol caps, and UV-C was also compared.

RESULTS

A 4-log reduction in colony forming units (CFUs) on the interior and exterior surfaces of the UV-transparent NC of clinically relevant pathogens was observed with UV-C light at this power for 1 second.

DISCUSSION

We demonstrated the efficacy of UV-C for the disinfection of NCs in one second using the UV-C device in benchtop studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This device holds promise for reducing CLABSI, and clinical studies are planned.

A Low-Cost Protocol Using the Adjunctive Action of Povidone-Iodine Irrigations and Sodium Hypochlorite Rinsing Solution in Step 2 of Periodontal Therapy for Patients with Stage III-IV Periodontitis: A Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

In severe stages of periodontitis, conventional periodontal therapy and maintenance care are usually insufficient due to the viral and bacterial etiology; thus, a mechanical approach alone may not be sufficient to eliminate a substantial portion of subgingival pathogens, especially in deep periodontal sites. Background and Objectives: This single-blind, randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy of a low-cost protocol using povidone-iodine and sodium hypochlorite formulations as adjuncts to non-surgical therapy for patients with stage IV periodontitis when compared with chlorhexidine, the most commonly employed substance to date for antimicrobial regimens in periodontal therapy. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients were randomly divided into two groups: control (subgingival instrumentation, chlorhexidine-assisted) and test (antiviral medication, subgingival instrumentation with povidone-iodine, sodium hypochlorite rinsing solution, and antibiotics). Clinical measurements and microbiological analyses were performed at baseline and after three months. Results: After three months, notable differences were found in the bacterial detection scores for Porphyromonas gingivalis (a significant reduction in detection frequency was observed in the test compared to the control (p = 0.021)), and there were significant reductions in detection in the test group for Tannerella forsythia and Treponema denticola, showing undetectable levels (p < 0.0001 for both). In the test group, the pocket probing depth median value was reduced significantly (p = 0.0005); similarly, bleeding on probing showed a marked decrease (p < 0.0001). However, changes in clinical attachment loss and full-mouth plaque score were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Using the proposed protocol, substantial improvements in clinical and microbiological parameters were obtained when compared with the current antimicrobial recommendations.

Factors associated with the disinfection of devices attached to peripheral intravenous catheters performed by the nursing team in pediatric units

Background

Peripheral intravenous catheterization, as well as drug administration through it, represents one of the most performed procedures by the Nursing team and, for that, precautions need to be adopted to offer harm-free care.

Objective

To verify the association of Nursing professionals' work shift and training time with proper disinfection of intravenous catheter devices in pediatric units.

Methods

A cross-sectional and analytical study conducted between June and August 2021 in three hospitalization units of a Pediatric Hospital. The inclusion criterion was drug administration via peripheral intravenous catheters performed by Nursing professionals. The data were analyzed according to inferential statistics, adopting p ≤ .05 as significance level.

Results

There were a total of 385 observations of drug administration procedures. The device was not disinfected in 60.3% of the cases, there was no friction at the suitable time in 86.3%, and the disinfectant was not allowed to dry in 72.5%. The work shift exerted no influence on performance of the disinfection procedure (p = .376). However, longer training time was associated with a lower rate in performing such procedure (p < .001).

Conclusion

Performing friction below the recommended time can cause a false sense of prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infection; therefore, training sessions and strategies for adherence to the disinfection procedures should be considered, mainly for professionals with more training time.

Compliance with central venous catheter infection prevention practices after intervention with simulation

OBJECTIVES

to assess the effect of an educational intervention based on clinical simulation on nursing professionals' compliance with practices to prevent peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated primary bloodstream infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

METHODS

a quasi-experimental study, with preand post-intervention assessment with a single group. The population consisted of 41 nursing professionals, with 31 observations being made before and after the intervention. Analyzes were performed using descriptive statistics and the McNemar non-parametric test. A significance level of 5% was adopted.

RESULTS

after the intervention, there was an increase in compliance with prevention practices of surgical antisepsis and professional hand hygiene, skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine, waiting for the time of the effect of alcoholic chlorhexidine and compliance with the sterile technique.

CONCLUSIONS

the educational intervention showed an effect on increasing compliance with catheter-associated infection prevention practices.

A mixed-methods evaluation on the efficacy and perceptions of needleless connector disinfectants

OBJECTIVE

Optimizing needleless connector hub disinfection practice is a key strategy in central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention. In this mixed-methods evaluation, 3 products with varying scrub times were tested for experimental disinfection followed by a qualitative nursing assessment of each.

METHODS

Needleless connectors were inoculated with varying concentrations of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus followed by disinfection with a 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) wipe (a 15-second scrub time and a 15-second dry time), a 70% IPA cap (a 10-second scrub time and a 5-second dry time), or a 3.15% chlorhexidine gluconate with 70% IPA (CHG/IPA) wipe (a 5-second scrub time and a 5-second dry time). Cultures of needleless connectors were obtained after disinfection to quantify bacterial reduction. This was followed by surveying a convenience sample of nursing staff with intensive care unit assignments at an academic tertiary hospital on use of each product.

RESULTS

All products reduced overall bacterial burden when compared to sterile water controls, however the IPA and CHG/IPA wipes were superior to the IPA caps when product efficacy was compared. Nursing staff noted improved compliance with CHG/IPA wipes compared with the IPA wipes and the IPA caps, with many preferring the lesser scrub and dry times required for disinfection.

CONCLUSION

Achieving adequate bacterial disinfection of needleless connectors while maximizing healthcare staff compliance with scrub and dry times may be best achieved with a combination CHG/IPA wipe.

Disinfection of needleless connectors to reduce Staphylococcus aureus bacterial load

HIGHLIGHTS

Compare effectiveness of chemical disinfectants in reducing S. aureus. Five disinfectants reduced the bacterial load, especially chlorhexidine solutions. Focus on Brazilian clinical practice of needleless connector disinfection.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to gain further knowledge about the comparative effectiveness of chemical disinfectants in reducing the bacterial load of NCs inoculated with S. aureus.

METHODS

Disinfection of needleless connectors was undertaken in vitro against S. aureus comparing 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA), 70% ethanol, 0.5% and 2% chlorhexidine in 70% IPA applied with gauze, and 70% IPA single-use cap (Site-Scrub®).

RESULTS

All disinfectants reduced the bacterial load (P<0.001), especially the chlorhexidine solutions. Mechanical friction should follow guidelines.

CONCLUSION

This study found that all tested disinfectants effectively reduced the bacterial load and more clinical studies must be developed with a focus on the Brazilian clinical practice of needleless connector disinfection.

Desinfecção de hubs e conectores de cateteres intravenosos

Objetivo: identificar métodos de desinfecção de hubs e conectores sem agulha dos cateteres intravenosos em pacientes hospitalizados e verificar a efetividade das intervenções para a prevenção de infecções de corrente sanguínea associada a cateter intravenoso. Método: revisão de escopo seguindo as recomendações de Joanna Briggs Institute. Busca realizada em bases de dados eletrônicas Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, Base de Dados Enfermagem e Bibliografía Nacional en Ciencias de la Salud Argentina, e estudos indicados por experts. A busca foi atemporal até setembro de 2020. Protocolo registrado na Open Science Framework. Resultados: foram incluídos 27 estudos, sendo que cinco foram Guidelines e 22 foram artigos publicados em periódicos. Existe grande variedade de métodos de desinfecção de hubs e de conectores. Para a desinfecção ativa, foram indicados Gluconato de Clorexedina, Isopropanol e Iodopovedina; para a desinfecção passiva, Gluconato de Clorexedina e Isopropanol. A quantidade do agente desinfetante variou de 0,25 mL a 0,6 mL. O tempo de fricção na desinfecção ativa variou de cinco segundos a 30 segundos, e o tempo de contato na desinfecção passiva variou de três minutos a sete dias. O tempo de secagem de agentes desinfetantes foi superior a cinco segundos. Conclusão: verifica-se variedade de métodos de desinfecção; no entanto, não há consenso sobre a melhor indicação. Necessita-se de estudos que evidenciem a quantidade de desinfetante, a pressão e o tempo de fricção e o tempo de secagem. Pesquisas com práticas de desinfecção utilizadas no Brasil e ensaios clínicos randomizados são necessários. 

Evaluating methods for the use and decontamination of needleless connectors: A qualitative inquiry

BACKGROUND

Needleless connectors (NCs) are essential devices designed to provide safe, needle-free connection between venous access devices, syringes and infusions. There is a variety of designs, and associated decontamination products and practices; the resulting confusion can cause detrimental patient outcomes. This study aimed to explore nurses' attitudes, techniques, and practices around the use and decontamination of NCs in clinical practice.

METHODS

Qualitative inquiry was conducted with seven focus groups of 4-6 participants each in the cancer and surgical units of a large tertiary hospital in Australia between January and March 2019. Participants comprised nurses who had taken part in a recent clinical trial of NC decontamination. Focus group sessions were recorded, transcribed and synthesised using content analysis.

RESULTS

Seven focus groups were conducted (total, N = 30 participants), lasting 16-20 min. Six major themes were identified surrounding needleless connector use and decontamination: 'safety and utility'; 'terminology and technological understanding'; 'clinical practice determinants'; 'decontamination procedures and influencers'; 'education and culture'; and 'research and innovation'.

CONCLUSION

The participants articulated positive attitudes towards needleless connector use for needle-stick and infection prevention, however rationales for care and maintenance practices demonstrated limited understanding of guidelines (e.g., disinfection time) and specific NC function (e.g., positive, negative pressure). The findings indicated the need for targeted, standardised needleless connector education, to enhance staff confidence, improve consistency of care and ensure patient safety.

Microbiological colonization of peripheral venous catheters: a prospective observational study in a Swedish county hospital

Background

Most peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) used in Scandinavia are fitted with an injection port, creating an open PVC system. This port is difficult to disinfect, which may lead to the introduction of micro-organisms upon use.

Aim

To investigate the prevalence of microbiological colonization of the injection port and internal lumen of ported PVCs with a minimum dwell time of 48 h at sample collection.

Methods

Adult patients admitted to different medical and surgical departments and the intensive care unit were invited to participate in this prospective observational study. With the PVC in situ, the injection port and internal lumen were swabbed and cultured separately. Demographic and clinical data were collected to compare patients with colonized and non-colonized PVCs.

Findings

In total, 300 PVCs from 300 patients were analysed. Of these, 33 patients (11.0%) had at least one positive culture. The colonization locations were as follows: port only, 26 (8.7%); internal lumen only, 5 (1.7%); and port and internal lumen, 2 (0.7%). The colonization rate was significantly higher in the injection port than in the internal lumen (P<0.0001). A ported PVC inserted in the hand incurred a significant risk of colonization (P=0.03). The odds ratio for colonization among patients in the infectious diseases department was 0.1 (95% confidence interval 0.1–1; P<0.06) compared with patients in the medical department.

Conclusion

This study showed that 11% of ported PVCs were colonized by micro-organisms, with the vast majority (8.7%) of colonization occurring in the injection port.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov; ID NCT03351725.

Challenges in reducing the risk of infection when accessing vascular catheters

Injection safety is essential to reduce the risk of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) when accessing vascular catheters. This general review evaluates the contamination of vascular catheter access ports and associated HAIs in acute care settings, focusing on open lumen stopcocks (OLSs) and disinfectable needleless closed connectors (DNCCs). PubMed was searched from January 2000 to February 2021. OLS intraluminal surfaces are frequently contaminated during patient care, increasing the risk of HAIs, and neither an isopropyl alcohol (IPA) pad nor a port-scrub device can reduce contamination effectively. In contrast, DNCCs can be disinfected, with most studies indicating less intraluminal contamination than OLSs and some studies showing decreased HAIs. While the optimal DNCC design to reduce HAIs needs to be determined, DNCCs alone or stopcocks with a DNCC bonded to the injection port should replace routine use of OLSs, with OLSs restricted to use in sterile fields. Compliance with disinfection is essential immediately before use of a DNCC as use of a non-disinfected DNCC can have equivalent or greater risk of HAIs compared with use of an OLS. The recommendations for access port disinfection in selected national and international guidelines vary. When comparing in-vitro studies, clinical studies and published guidelines, consensus is lacking; therefore, additional studies are needed, including large randomized controlled trials. IPA caps disinfect DNCCs passively, eliminate scrubbing and provide a contamination barrier; however, their use in neonates has been questioned. Further study is needed to determine whether IPA caps are more efficacious than scrubbing with disinfectant to decrease HAIs related to use of central venous, peripheral venous and arterial catheters.

Needleless connector decontamination for prevention of central venous access device infection: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Pilot randomized controlled trial (180 patients) of needleless connector decontamination. Central line-associated bloodstream infection occurred in 2% (1/61) of 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) wipe, 2% (1/59) of 70% IPA cap, and zero (0/58) infections in 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% IPA wipe patients. Larger definitive trials are feasible and needed.