Binocular visual acuity in intermittent exotropia: role of accommodative convergence

Altered functional connectivity of resting-state networks and the correlation with clinical characteristics in intermittent exotropia adult patients: a resting-state magnetic resonance imaging study

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of intermittent exotropia (IXT) remains unclear. The study aims to investigate alterations of resting-state networks (RSNs) in IXT adult patients using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data to explore the potential neural mechanisms.

METHODS

Twenty-six IXT adult patients and 22 age-, sex-, handedness-, and education-matched healthy controls (HCs) underwent fMRI scanning and ophthalmological examinations. Brain areas with significant functional connectivity (FC) differences between the IXT and HC groups were selected as regions of interest (ROI) and mean z-scores were calculated to control for individual differences.

RESULTS

Compared with HCs, IXT patients exhibited altered FC in various brain regions within RSNs involved in binocular fusion, stereopsis, ocular movement, emotional processes and social cognition, including the default mode network (DMN), the dorsal attention network (DAN), the visual network (VN), the sensorimotor network (SMN), the executive control network (ECN), the frontoparietal network (FPN) and the auditory network (AN). The degree of exodeviation was positively correlated with FC value of left middle occipital gyrus (MOG) within the VN. Correspondingly, we found a negative correlation between the degree of exodeviation and the FC value of left angular gyrus (AG) within FPN (P < 0.05). The FNC analysis between different RSNs also provides evidence on visual-motor cortical plasticity.

CONCLUSIONS

IXT patients showed widespread changes of brain activity within RSNs related to binocular fusion, stereopsis, oculomotor control, emotional processes, and social cognition. These findings extend our current understanding of the neuropathological mechanisms of IXT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Beginning date of the trial: 2021-09-01. Date of registration:2021-07-18. Trial registration number: ChiCTR 2,100,048,852. Trial registration site: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx .

Assessment of distance-near control disparity in basic and divergence excess paediatric intermittent exotropia

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In intermittent exotropia (IXT), deviation is better controlled at near fixation. Understanding of the mechanism responsible for this common observation may improve clinical management of IXT.

BACKGROUND

The physiological basis for the distance-near difference in control of deviation in IXT is vastly undetermined. A new parameter, 'control score disparity (CSD)', defined as the difference between distance and near control scores, is introduced. Association of CSD with positive fusional amplitude (PFA), accommodative convergence to accommodation (AC/A) ratio and distance angle of deviation was investigated to further understand the mechanisms.

METHOD

Patients aged between four and fifteen years with basic and divergence excess IXT were included. Subjects with previous strabismus surgery, amblyopia and inability to perform clinical tests were excluded. A standardized office-based scoring system was used to assess IXT controls. Subjects were sub-divided into group 1 (CSD <2) and group 2 (CSD ≥2). Pearson's univariate and regression analysis were used to determine relationships between CSD and other independent variables.

RESULTS

Mean age of the total 141 subjects (57.6% female) was 6.8 ± 2.5 years. Basic IXT was more common (60%) and 60% had CSD ≥2. The mean±SD distance angle of deviation, AC/A ratio, PFA and CSD were 22.1 ± 6.6 prism dioptres, 5.0 ± 1.0, 28.6 ± 6.3 prism dioptre and 2.0 ± 0.5, respectively. CSD was significantly correlated to PFA (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) and AC/A ratio (r = 0.27, p < 0.001) in overall samples and Group 2 subjects (r = 0.41, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PFA is a major factor associated with the distance/near difference of IXT control. Individuals with a higher PFA demonstrated greater CSD. While AC/A ratio was associated in better control at near in divergence excess IXT, magnitude of angle appears irrelevant.

Optimised minus lens overcorrection for paediatric intermittent exotropia: A randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel algorithm to customise overminus lens therapy in intermittent exotropia (IXT) based on clinical factors associated with control of the deviation.

METHODS

Clinical parameters in IXT vary among individuals. Based on individual's physiological factors, an algorithm was developed. Children aged between 4 and 15 years with IXT were randomised into OML and observation groups. Participants in the observation group were corrected for any significant refractive error. IXT control score, angle of deviation, refraction, axial length and stereopsis were examined at baseline and follow up ranging between 6 and 15 months and compared. Compliance and tolerance to OML was determined by a symptom survey.

RESULTS

The OML power ranged between -1.00D and - 6.25D. Of the total 141 participants (mean age 6.8 ± 2.5 year), 77 were in the OML and 66 were in observation group. IXT control score improved (mean difference - 2.5 ± 1.1; p < 0.001) and angle of deviation reduced (6.9 ± 7.2pd; p < 0.001) significantly in the OML group only. Compliance rate to OML wear was 80%; 90% never or rarely experienced asthenopia symptoms. Slightly greater myopic shift (-0.36 ± 0.53D vs. -0.18 ± 0.55D) and change in axial length (0.17 vs. 0.14 mm) were observed in the OML group, but these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

A customised OML, calculated using this novel algorithm was effective in improving distance control, angle of deviation and stereopsis. Glasses wear was highly tolerable.

Evaluation of dynamic stereopsis in intermittent exotropia patients

AIM

To delineate the characteristics of the dynamic stereopsis test and analyze related parameters in intermittent exotropia [X(T)] patients.

METHODS

Fifty-seven X(T) patients and 55 normal subjects were enrolled in this study. The normal and X(T) groups were used to test the reproducibility and reliability of the dynamic stereopsis test, and Bangerter filters with densities of 0.2 were then used to simulate suppression to test for traditional and dynamic stereopsis. In the X(T) group, the measurements included 1) dynamic stereopsis test comprising three parts: motion+disparity, motion only and disparity only; 2) ocular deviation angle; 3) Bagolini striated lens test; 4) disease course; and 5) Titmus stereopsis test.

RESULTS

The test-retest reliability of the dynamic stereopsis method was 0.901 in the normal and X(T) groups, and none of the X(T) patients were able to pass the static and dynamic stereopsis tests after using the 0.2 Bangerter filter. The accuracy rate was greater than 80% in the normal group and 31.81%, 36.36%, and 45.45% for the motion+disparity, motion-only and disparity-only components of the traditional test for X(T) patients diagnosed with stereoblindness via traditional tests, respectively. Patients with a long disease course (>1y) had worse dynamic stereopsis than those with a short disease course (<1y; P<0.05, Chi-square test). The deviation angle was not correlated with the motion+disparity, disparity-only, or the motion-only test components (all P>0.05, Chi-square test).

CONCLUSION

Dynamic stereopsis is preserved in certain X(T) patients diagnosed with stereoblindness via traditional tests. A long disease course was shown to be a negative factor for dynamic stereopsis in X(T) patients which might be associated with worse progression, and provide good references clinically.

2016 International Orthoptic Congress Burian Lecture: Folklore or Evidence?

The theme of the 2016 Burian Lecture is how our understanding of strabismus has been changed by the research carried out in our laboratory in Reading over the years. Accommodation and convergence are fundamental to orthoptics, but actual responses have often been very different compared to what we had expected. This paper outlines how our laboratory's understanding of common issues such as normal development of accommodation and convergence, their linkage, intermittent strabismus, anisometropia, orthoptic exercises, and risk factors for strabismus have changed. A new model of thinking about convergence and accommodation may help us to better understand and predict responses in our patients.