Do Largest Basal Tumor Diameter and the American Joint Committee on Cancer's Cancer Staging Influence Prognostication by Gene Expression Profiling in Choroidal Melanoma

Confirmatory Cytopathology and Potential Impact on the Predictive Value of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients With Uveal Melanoma

Purpose: To determine whether the availability of a cytopathology-confirming diagnosis is correlated with the prognostic accuracy of a gene expression profiling assay. Methods: A single-center retrospective review was performed of patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma who had a fine-needle aspiration biopsy and gene expression profiling before proton therapy from 2012 to 2020. The development of metastases was compared in patients with gene expression profiling and cytopathology (gene expression profiling+cytopathology group) and patients with gene expression profiling only (gene expression profiling only group). Results: Of 141 patients with gene expression profiling, 98 (69.5%) had cytopathology results and 43 (30.5%) did not. The median tumor thickness was greater in the gene expression profiling+cytopathology group (5.0 mm) than in the gene expression profiling only group (3.1 mm) (P = .0003). The distribution of gene expression profiling class in these 2 groups, respectively, was class 1A, 38 (38.8%) vs 20 (46.5%); class 1B, 20 (20.4%) vs 15 (34.9%); class 2, 40 (40.8%) vs 8 (18.6%). Class 1A tumors metastasized in 4 patients (10.5%) in the gene expression profiling+cytopathology group and 3 patients (15.0%) in the gene expression profiling only group. Class 1B tumors metastasized in 3 patients (15.0%) and 1 patient (6.7%), and class 2 tumors metastasized in 18 patients (45.0%) and 5 patients (62.5%) in these 2 groups, respectively. The median months from initial treatment to metastasis diagnosis within each gene expression profiling class for the gene expression profiling+cytopathology and gene expression profiling only groups, respectively, was class 1A, 36.7 vs 33.6 (P = .86); class 1B, 37.8 vs 68.6 (P = 1.0); class 2, 19.0 vs 15.8 (P = .70). Conclusions: We found no evidence that the lack of confirmatory cytology negatively affects the accuracy of gene expression profiling, and no significant differences were found in the overall rates of metastasis between patients with and patients without cytopathology or rates within each class of gene expression profiling.

Genetic Features of Uveal Melanoma

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Although it comprises only 5% of all melanomas, uveal melanoma (UM) is the most commonly observed primary intraocular cancer.

METHODS

Poor patient survival persists in spite of innovative systemic therapies. In fact, approximately fifty percent of UM patients develop metastases from micro-metastases that remain undetected at the exact time of diagnosis.

RESULTS

The molecular understanding of UM is significantly enhanced by the recent identification of several mutations that are responsible for the metastasis, growth, and survival of UM. The crucial point is a more accurate genetic analysis for patient follow-up and metastatic risk prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a brief summary of the molecular features of UM that are recently discovered, as well as cytogenetic markers and biochemical pathways that are associated with the development of UM metastases.

15-Gene Expression Profile and PRAME as Integrated Prognostic Test for Uveal Melanoma: First Report of Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study No. 2 (COOG2.1)

PURPOSEValidated and accurate prognostic testing is critical for precision medicine in uveal melanoma (UM). Our aims were to (1) prospectively validate an integrated prognostic classifier combining a 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) and PRAME RNA expression and (2) identify clinical variables that enhance the prognostic accuracy of the 15-GEP/PRAME classifier.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis study included 1,577 patients with UM of the choroid and/or ciliary body who were enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study Number 2 (COOG2) and prospectively monitored across 26 North American centers. Test results for 15-GEP (class 1 or class 2) and PRAME expression status (negative or positive) were available for all patients. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival (MFS).RESULTS15-GEP was class 1 in 1,082 (68.6%) and class 2 in 495 (31.4%) patients. PRAME status was negative in 1,106 (70.1%) and positive in 471 (29.9%) patients. Five-year MFS was 95.6% (95% CI, 93.9 to 97.4) for class 1/PRAME(-), 80.6% (95% CI, 73.9 to 87.9) for class 1/PRAME(+), 58.3% (95% CI, 51.1 to 66.4) for class 2/PRAME(-), and 44.8% (95% CI, 37.9 to 52.8) for class 2/PRAME(+). By multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, 15-GEP was the most important independent predictor of MFS (hazard ratio [HR], 5.95 [95% CI, 4.43 to 7.99]; P < .001), followed by PRAME status (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.42 to 2.33]; P < .001). The only clinical variable demonstrating additional prognostic value was tumor diameter.CONCLUSIONIn the largest prospective multicenter prognostic biomarker study performed to date in UM to our knowledge, the COOG2 study validated the superior prognostic accuracy of the integrated 15-GEP/PRAME classifier over 15-GEP alone and clinical prognostic variables. Tumor diameter was found to be the only clinical variable to provide additional prognostic information. This prognostic classifier provides an advanced resource for risk-adjusted metastatic surveillance and adjuvant trial stratification in patients with UM.

Recent Advances in Molecular and Genetic Research on Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma (UM), a distinct subtype of melanoma, presents unique challenges in its clinical management due to its complex molecular landscape and tendency for liver metastasis. This review highlights recent advancements in understanding the molecular pathogenesis, genetic alterations, and immune microenvironment of UM, with a focus on pivotal genes, such as GNAQ/11, BAP1, and CYSLTR2, and delves into the distinctive genetic and chromosomal classifications of UM, emphasizing the role of mutations and chromosomal rearrangements in disease progression and metastatic risk. Novel diagnostic biomarkers, including circulating tumor cells, DNA and extracellular vesicles, are discussed, offering potential non-invasive approaches for early detection and monitoring. It also explores emerging prognostic markers and their implications for patient stratification and personalized treatment strategies. Therapeutic approaches, including histone deacetylase inhibitors, MAPK pathway inhibitors, and emerging trends and concepts like CAR T-cell therapy, are evaluated for their efficacy in UM treatment. This review identifies challenges in UM research, such as the limited treatment options for metastatic UM and the need for improved prognostic tools, and suggests future directions, including the discovery of novel therapeutic targets, immunotherapeutic strategies, and advanced drug delivery systems. The review concludes by emphasizing the importance of continued research and innovation in addressing the unique challenges of UM to improve patient outcomes and develop more effective treatment strategies.

Management of Uveal Melanoma: Updated Cancer Care Alberta Clinical Practice Guideline

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this guideline update is to reassess and update recommendations in the prior guideline from 2016 on the appropriate management of patients with uveal melanoma.

METHODS

In 2021, a multidisciplinary working group from the Provincial Cutaneous Tumour Team, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services was convened to update the guideline. A comprehensive review of new research evidence in PubMed as well as new clinical practice guidelines from prominent oncology groups informed the update. An enhancement in methodology included adding levels of evidence and strength of recommendations. The updated guideline was circulated to all members of the Provincial Cutaneous Tumour Team for review and endorsement.

RESULTS

New and modified recommendations address provider training requirements, diagnostic imaging for the detection of metastases, neo-adjuvant pre-enucleation radiotherapy, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for radiation retinopathy, genetic prognostic testing, surveillance following definitive local therapy, and systemic therapy for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

DISCUSSION

The recommendations represent evidence-based standards of care agreed to by a large multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals.

Investigating Vitreous Cytokines in Choroidal Melanoma

Due to the close relationship between the vitreous and posterior eye layers, the microenvironment of these layers can affect the composition of the vitreous. Molecular analysis of the vitreous may therefore provide important insights into the pathogenesis of chorioretinal diseases. In this study, vitreous cytokines (n = 41) were evaluated to gain further insights into the tumor microenvironment in uveal melanoma (UM) arising from the choroid (CM). Cytokine levels were measured using a bead-based multiplex immunoassay panel in vitreous samples obtained from 32 eyes, including 18 with CM and 14 controls. Median fluorescence intensity values were extracted and used as relative quantification of the cytokine abundance. Vitreous cytokine levels were compared between the CM and non-CM groups and between different prognostic categories within the CM group (classified as having low or high metastatic risk using tumor biopsy-based gene expression profiling). Correlations between vitreous cytokine levels and tumor dimensions were also evaluated. Our analysis revealed twenty-six vitreous cytokines significantly upregulated in CM-affected eyes compared to the control eyes. Within the CM group, six vitreous cytokines showed altered levels (five upregulated and one downregulated) in eyes with high- vs. low-risk tumors. Levels of these six plus several other cytokines showed correlations with the tumor dimensions. In conclusion, our study has uncovered several UM-relevant vitreous cytokines, worthy of follow-up in larger studies as potential candidates for liquid biopsy-based biomarker development and/or new therapeutic targeting.

Validation of the Prognostic Usefulness of the Gene Expression Profiling Test in Patients with Uveal Melanoma

PURPOSE

To validate the prognostic usefulness of gene expression profile (GEP) testing in patients with uveal melanoma. To determine whether combining tumor size with the GEP classification provides additional prognostic value.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a diagnosis of choroidal melanoma examined at Yale New Haven Hospital; University of California, San Diego; and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

METHODS

Patients' demographic and clinical data and tumor characteristics were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis were used to assess the association between tumor characteristics and GEP classification with metastasis as an outcome.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Metastasis-free survival (MFS).

RESULTS

Of the 337 individuals included in the study, 87 demonstrated metastases. The mean follow-up time was 37.2 (standard deviation [SD], 40.2) months for patients with metastases and 55.0 (SD, 49.3) months for those without metastases. Tumors of larger thickness and GEP class 2 (vs. class 1) were associated significantly with increased risk of metastasis. Tumor thickness showed better prognostic usefulness than GEP classification (Wald statistic, 40.7 and 24.2, respectively). Class 2 tumors with a thickness of 7.0 mm or more were associated with increased risk of metastasis than tumors with a thickness of < 7.0 mm (hazard ratio [HR], 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61-6.51), whereas class 1 tumors with a thickness of 9.0 mm or more were associated with increased risk of metastasis than tumors with a thickness of < 9.0 mm (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 0.86-4.99). No difference in MFS was found between patients with class 1A tumors compared with those with class 1B tumors (P = 0.8). Patients with class 2 tumors showed an observed 5-year MFS of 47.5% (95% CI, 36.0%-62.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size was the most significant predictor of metastasis and provided additional prognostic value independent of GEP classification. In addition, rates of metastasis for class 2 tumors were lower than estimates reported by Castle Bioscience, and no difference in rates of metastasis were found between class 1A and 1B tumors. This indicates that tumor size should be accounted for when relying on GEP for prognostication and that patients with GEP class 1A or 1B tumors may benefit from the same metastatic surveillance protocols.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Advances in the clinical management of uveal melanoma

Melanomas arising in the uveal tract of the eye are a rare form of the disease with a biology and clinical phenotype distinct from their more common cutaneous counterparts. Treatment of primary uveal melanoma with radiotherapy, enucleation or other modalities achieves local control in more than 90% of patients, although 40% or more ultimately develop distant metastases, most commonly in the liver. Until January 2022, no systemic therapy had received regulatory approval for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma, and these patients have historically had a dismal prognosis owing to the limited efficacy of the available treatments. A series of seminal studies over the past two decades have identified highly prevalent early, tumour-initiating oncogenic genomic aberrations, later recurring prognostic alterations and immunological features that characterize uveal melanoma. These advances have driven the development of a number of novel emerging treatments, including tebentafusp, the first systemic therapy to achieve regulatory approval for this disease. In this Review, our multidisciplinary and international group of authors summarize the biology of uveal melanoma, management of primary disease and surveillance strategies to detect recurrent disease, and then focus on the current standard and emerging regional and systemic treatment approaches for metastatic uveal melanoma.

Predicted vs Observed Metastasis-Free Survival in Individuals With Uveal Melanoma

Importance

Accuracy of the predicted metastasis-free survival (MFS) by a commercially available gene expression profiling (GEP) test is not known.

Objective

To compare the predicted MFS with the observed MFS in patients in this cohort and with those in published studies (published MFS, meta-analysis).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study included consecutive patients from the University of Iowa and Cleveland Clinic who were diagnosed with uveal melanoma who underwent prognostic fine-needle aspiration biopsy at the time of primary treatment. Patients were recruited from December 2012 to December 2020. The predicted MFS for patients was extracted from the GEP report. The observed MFS was defined as time to metastasis. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to identify tumor variables impacting MFS in patients with class 2 tumors. The overall estimate of the published MFS was obtained by performing meta-analysis of data from published series. Analysis took place in August 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures

MFS.

Results

There were 92 patients from the University of Iowa and 255 patients from the Cleveland Clinic. The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 59.4 (13.0) years. The median (IQR) follow-up interval was 38.0 (19.0-57.0) months. The observed MFS for patients with class 2 tumor in this cohort (3 years: 67% [95% CI, 59%-77%]; 5 years: 47% [95% CI, 37%-61%]) and in published studies (3 years: 62% [95% CI, 57%-66%]; 5 years: 40% [95% CI, 34%-46%]) were better than those predicted (50% and 28% for 3 and 5 years, respectively). Within patients with class 2 tumor, those with metastasis had larger tumors compared with nonmetastatic tumors (mean largest basal diameter difference, 1.7 [95% CI, 0.5-3.0] mm; P = .01; mean thickness ratio, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.04-1.5]; P = .01, respectively). An increasing tumor size was significantly associated with increased hazard ratio (1.16 [95% CI, 1.06-1.27]; P < .001) of metastasis.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest the predicted MFS for metastatic tumors (class 2) appears to be worse than that observed here and reported by others. Incorporation of tumor size in the prediction model may enhance its accuracy. Adjuvant therapy trials may not be able to rely on predicted MFS to calculate efficacy with a high degree of confidence.

Uveal melanoma patient attitudes towards prognostic testing using gene expression profiling

Aim:

This study explored uveal melanoma patient experiences and regret following molecular prognostic testing using a 15-gene expression profile (GEP) test.

Materials & methods:

A retrospective, cross-sectional survey study was conducted through an online questionnaire capturing patient-reported experiences with prognostic biopsy/molecular testing.

Results:

Of 177 respondents, 159 (90%) wanted prognostic information at diagnosis. Most 15-GEP-tested patients who shared their results (99%) reported gaining value from testing, as did patients tested with other methods. Patients who received prognostic testing experienced lower decision regret than those who opted out. Decision regret did not differ based on GEP class.

Conclusion:

Most uveal melanoma patients desire prognostic testing and gain value from the GEP, independent of a high- or low-risk result.

Uveal melanoma is a rare but aggressive eye cancer, resulting in distant metastasis in nearly 50% of patients. Molecular prognostic testing is often employed to determine who is at high or low risk of developing metastatic disease. A prognostic 15-gene expression profiling (GEP) test is commonly used throughout the USA and parts of Canada. The goal of this survey was to assess patient experiences with the 15-GEP and other prognostic methods. Of the 177 patients who participated in the survey, the majority reported that they wanted prognostic information at the time of diagnosis. Of patients who underwent 15-GEP testing, nearly all reported gaining value from their test result, regardless of their individual risk profile. This study supports prior findings using other prognostic methods that patients prefer information about their risk of metastasis and reinforces the importance of discussing prognostic testing options with newly diagnosed uveal melanoma patients.

Integrative analysis identifies key genes related to metastasis and a robust gene-based prognostic signature in uveal melanoma

PURPOSE

Uveal melanoma (UM) is an aggressive intraocular malignancy, leading to systemic metastasis in half of the patients. However, the mechanism of the high metastatic rate remains unclear. This study aimed to identify key genes related to metastasis and construct a gene-based signature for better prognosis prediction of UM patients.

METHODS

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was used to identify the co-expression of genes primarily associated with metastasis of UM. Univariate, Lasso-penalized and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to establish a prognostic signature for UM patients.

RESULTS

The tan and greenyellow modules were significantly associated with the metastasis of UM patients. Significant genes related to the overall survival (OS) in these two modules were then identified. Additionally, an OS-predicting signature was established. The UM patients were divided into a low- or high-risk group. The Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that high-risk patients had poorer OS than low-risk patients. The receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to validate the stability and accuracy of the final five-gene signature. Based on the signature and clinical traits of UM patients, a nomogram was established to serve in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified key genes involved in the metastasis of UM. A robust five-gene-based prognostic signature was constructed and validated. In addition, the gene signature-based nomogram was created that can optimize the prognosis prediction and identify possible factors causing the poor prognosis of high-risk UM patients.

Preliminary Results of Uveal Melanoma Treated With Iodine-125 Plaques: Analysis of Disease Control and Visual Outcomes With 63 Gy to the Target Volume

Purpose

Our purpose was to review the preliminary outcomes of patients with uveal melanoma treated with iodine-125 plaques using a novel treatment planning approach.

Methods and Materials

This was a single institution, retrospective review of patients treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma from November 2016 to February 2019. We used 3-dimensional treatment planning with the Eye Physics Plaque Simulator to ensure that a minimum of 63 Gy covered a 2-mm circumferential tumor margin and the apex height of the tumor over 94 hours. Primary endpoints were local failure, systemic metastasis, final visual acuity (VA), and radiation retinopathy. Associations between primary endpoints and tumor characteristics/radiation dose were performed using univariate analysis.

Results

Sixty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Mean largest basal diameter was 11.67 mm (range, 6-18; median, 12), and the average tumor thickness to the inner sclera was 3.18 mm (range, 0.5-9.3; median, 2.8). Molecular testing that was successfully performed in 59 patients revealed that 27% (16 of 59) had class 2 gene expression profile designation. Average follow-up posttreatment was 28.3 months (range, 4-46; median, 29), with 6% (4 of 69) developing local failure and 6% (4 of 69) developing metastasis over this duration. Average final VA (0.57 logMAR [Snellen 20/74]; range, 0-2.9; median, 0.3) was decreased from baseline (0.34 logMAR [Snellen 20/44]; range, 0-2.3; median, 0.1), and 48% (33 of 69) developed radiation retinopathy. Fifty percent of patients had a final VA 20/40 or better and 22% had a final VA 20/200 or worse.

Conclusions

In patients with uveal melanoma, preliminary results with brachytherapy using Eye Physics plaques with a treatment plan that delivers 63 Gy to a 2-mm circumferential tumor margin and the tumor apex suggest effective disease control and favorable VA outcomes.

Five-Year Follow-up of Microincisional Vitrectomy Surgery, Endolaser Tumor Ablation, and Gene-Expression Profiling in Small Uveal Melanoma

Purpose:

This work evaluates a microincisional vitrectomy surgical (MIVS) approach to endolaser ablation of small uveal malignant melanoma by incorporating genetic tumor classification as a means to avoid radiotherapy while maintaining local tumor control without compromising visual acuity (VA).

Methods:

An institutional review board–approved, single-surgeon, retrospective analysis was conducted of a consecutive case series of all patients with tumors less than 2.5 mm in apical thickness who underwent MIVS, endolaser tumor ablation, fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for small uveal melanoma between 2012 and 2015.

Results:

A total of 226 patients underwent FNAB from January 2012 to January 2015 for uveal melanoma. All 58 patients treated for a small uveal melanoma were included. This group of patients had a minimum follow-up of 60 months (range, 60-93 months). At initial diagnosis, subretinal fluid was present in 52 eyes (89.1%), macular edema was present in 24 eyes (41.4%), and epiretinal membrane was present in 11 eyes (20.1%). Fifty-six specimens (96.5%) received a molecular classification of either class 2 (4 of 56, 7.1%) or class 1 (52 of 56, 92.8%). Initial VA was 20/40 or better in 26 eyes (44.8%), and final VA was 20/40 or better in 48 of 58 eyes (82.8%).

Conclusions:

Endolaser tumor ablation delivered at MIVS surgery enables excellent tumor control (98.3%) and improves VA to better than 20/40 in more than 80% of treated eyes. FNAB achieves molecular classification in 96.5% of all patients undergoing treatment for small choroidal melanoma independent of tumor size.

Metastatic Risk Factors Associated with Class 1A Uveal Melanoma Patients

Simple Summary

Uveal melanoma (UM), patients with Class 1A gene expression profiling (GEP), have a lower metastatic risk (2% at 5 years) compared to Class 1B or Class 2 patients. However, further risk stratification could help to adapt follow-up intervals in Class 1A UM patients according to their metastatic risk. Our single-center IRB-approved retrospective case series review of 73 Class 1A UM patients aimed to identify risk factors associated with metastasis development and overall survival. We show that Class 1A UM patients with stage III disease and/or large COMS size are at elevated risk for metastasis. Combined clinical decision-making utilizing AJCC stage and COMS size could have a significant clinical impact by improving risk stratification and adapting follow-up intervals in Class 1A UM patients.

Abstract

In uveal melanoma (UM), gene expression profiling (GEP) is commonly used to classify metastatic risk into three groups (Class 1A, 1B, and 2). Class 1A patients have a lower metastatic risk of 2% at 5 years compared to other groups. We aimed to describe clinical features associated with the development of metastasis in this low-risk group. This single-center IRB-approved retrospective case series review included all UM patients between February 2006 and March 2019 with an archived or fresh specimen classified as Class 1A. Cox regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses were used to identify factors associated with metastasis development and OS. Among 73 UM patients with Class 1A, the 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis was 4.2% and 17.0%, respectively. Stage III disease (HR 20.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.4–300.6; p= 0.0264) was found to be independently associated with metastatic recurrence, while primary therapy was associated with OS (enucleation vs. brachytherapy, HR 13.5; 95% CI 1.3–147.6; p = 0.0348). Combined clinical decision-making utilizing factors such as GEP class, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and COMS size could have a significant clinical impact by improving risk stratification and adapting follow-up intervals in UM Class 1A patients.

Recent advancements in the management of retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma

Retinoblastoma in children and uveal melanoma in adults can pose a serious threat to both vision and life. For many decades, enucleation was often the only option to treat these intraocular malignancies. For retinoblastoma, intra-arterial chemotherapy is often utilized as the primary treatment at advanced academic centers and has dramatically improved local tumor control and eye salvage rates. For uveal melanoma, both plaque brachytherapy and proton beam irradiation have served as widely utilized therapies with a local failure rate of approximately 1–10%, depending on the series. Major recent advancements have allowed for a better understanding of the genomics of uveal melanoma and the impact of certain mutations on metastatic susceptibility. Gene expression profile stratifies uveal melanomas into two classes: low-risk (class 1) and high-risk (class 2). A loss-of-function mutation of BAP1 is associated with a class 2 gene expression profile and therefore confers worse prognosis due to elevated risk of metastasis. On the other hand, gain-of-function mutations of EIF1AX and SF3B1 correspond to a gene expression profile of class 1A and class 1B and confer a better prognosis. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is an antigen that increases metastatic susceptibility when expressed in uveal melanoma cells. In addition to plaque brachytherapy and proton beam irradiation, both of which have demonstrated superb clinical outcomes, scientists are actively investigating newer therapeutic modalities as either primary therapy or adjuvant treatment, including a novel nanoparticle therapy and immunotherapy.

Gene Expression Profiling in Uveal Melanoma: Five-Year Prospective Outcomes and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The prognostic 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) test for uveal melanoma (UM) predicts metastatic risk based on primary tumor biology. Here we report outcomes from a prospective registry of 15-GEP-tested patients, and a meta-analysis with published cohorts.

Objectives

Management and 5-year clinical outcomes following 15-GEP testing were evaluated.

Methods

Eighty-nine patients with 15-GEP results were prospectively enrolled at four centers. Physician-recommended management plans were collected, and clinical outcomes tracked every 6 months.

Results

Eighty percent of Class 1 (low-risk) patients underwent low-intensity management; all Class 2 (high-risk) patients underwent high-intensity management (p < 0.0001). Median follow-up for event-free patients was 4.9 years. Five Class 1 (10%) and 23 Class 2 (58%) tumors metastasized (p < 0.0001). Five-year Class 1 and 2 metastasis-free survival rates were 90% (81-100%) and 41% (27-62%; p < 0.0001), and melanoma-specific survival rates were 94% (87-100%) and 63% (49-82%; p = 0.0007). Class 2 was the only independent predictor of metastasis and was associated with increased risk for metastasis and mortality by meta-analysis.

Conclusions

UM patient management is guided by 15-GEP testing. Class 2 patients were managed more intensely, in accordance with an observed metastatic rate of >50%; Class 1 patients were safely spared intensive surveillance, resulting in appropriate utilization of healthcare resources.

Gene Expression Profiling Prognostication of Posterior Uveal Melanoma: Does Size Matter?

PURPOSE

Investigate the influence of tumor size by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) size, tumor largest basal diameter (LBD), and tumor thickness on prognostication by gene expression profiling (GEP) class.

DESIGN

Two-center retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred fifteen consecutive patients diagnosed with posterior uveal melanoma over a 5-year period who were evaluated with prognostic fine-needle aspiration biopsy at the time of primary treatment.

METHODS

Patient demographics, tumor clinical size, AJCC stage, COMS size, GEP class, presence of metastasis, and mortality data were collected. Metastasis-free-survival (MFS) was defined as time to metastasis or death from any cause. Comparisons were made using Pearson chi-square tests or Fisher exact tests for categorical factors, and t tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous measures. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to identify whether size measurements increased the prognostic discrimination index (C-statistic).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Metastasis-free-survival.

RESULTS

The average follow-up interval was 22.0 months (range, 12.0-37.0 months). Eighty-nine tumors were class 1A, 48 class 1B, and 78 class 2. Twenty-one patients developed metastatic disease detected by surveillance and confirmed by liver biopsy. Three-year MFS was 96% for class 1 and 63% for class 2. Five-year MFS was 96% for class 1 and 49% for class 2. All size measures significantly improved prognostic discrimination index by GEP class, as shown by increase in the C-statistic with addition of size variables (C-statistic 0.750 GEP alone, 0.830 GEP with AJCC [P = 0.016], 0.822 GEP with COMS [P < 0.001], 0.842 GEP with LBD [P <0.001], and 0.847 GEP with tumor thickness [P < 0.001]). Class 2 patients with metastasis had larger tumors compared with nonmetastatic class 2 tumors (AJCC class, P = 0.004; COMS class, P = 0.024; with metastasis mean thickness 6.5 mm [interquartile range (IQR), 3.8-9.5 mm]; without metastasis, 3.9 mm [SD, 3.1-6.0 mm]; P = 0.008), with metastasis mean LBD 14.9±2.8 mm, without metastasis, 12.3±2.7 mm (P < 0.001). All class 1 tumors with metastasis were large and required enucleation.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of tumor size enhances the prognostic discrimination index of the GEP test in patients with posterior uveal melanoma. All size tumor parameters are equivalent in their ability to enhance GEP prognostication.