1
|
Daniels AB, Chang EY, Chew EY, Gombos DS, Gorin MB, Shields CL, Wiley HE. Consensus Guidelines for Ocular Surveillance of von Hippel-Lindau Disease. Ophthalmology 2024; 131:622-633. [PMID: 38092079 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop guidelines for ocular surveillance and early intervention for individuals with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease. DESIGN Systematic review of the literature. PARTICIPANTS Expert panel of retina specialists and ocular oncologists. METHODS A consortium of experts on clinical management of all-organ aspects of VHL disease was convened. Working groups with expertise in organ-specific features of VHL disease were tasked with development of evidence-based guidelines for each organ system. The ophthalmology subcommittee formulated questions for consideration and performed a systematic literature review. Evidence was graded for topic quality and relevance and the strength of each recommendation, and guideline recommendations were developed. RESULTS The quality of evidence was limited, and no controlled clinical trial data were available. Consensus guidelines included: (1) individuals with known or suspected VHL disease should undergo periodic ocular screening (evidence type, III; evidence strength, C; degree of consensus, 2A); (2) patients at risk of VHL disease, including first-degree relatives of patients with known VHL disease, or any patient with single or multifocal retinal hemangioblastomas (RHs), should undergo genetic testing for pathologic VHL disease gene variants as part of an appropriate medical evaluation (III/C/2A); (3) ocular screening should begin within 12 months after birth and continue throughout life (III/C/2A); (4) ocular screening should occur approximately every 6 to 12 months until 30 years of age and then at least yearly thereafter (III/C-D/2A); (5) ocular screening should be performed before a planned pregnancy and every 6 to 12 months during pregnancy (IV/D/2A); (6) ultra-widefield color fundus photography may be helpful in certain circumstances to monitor RHs, and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography may be helpful in certain circumstances to detect small RHs (IV/D/2A); (7) patients should be managed, whenever possible, by those with subspecialty training, with experience with VHL disease or RHs, or with both and ideally within the context of a multidisciplinary center capable of providing multiorgan surveillance and access to genetic testing (IV/D/2A); (8) extramacular or extrapapillary RHs should be treated promptly (III/C/2A). CONCLUSIONS Based on available evidence from observational studies, broad agreement was reached for a strategy of lifelong surveillance and early treatment for ocular VHL disease. These guidelines were endorsed by the VHL Alliance and the International Society of Ocular Oncology and were approved by the American Academy of Ophthalmology Board of Trustees. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony B Daniels
- Division of Ocular Oncology and Pathology, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| | | | - Emily Y Chew
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael B Gorin
- Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Carol L Shields
- Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dhanani U, Mortensen PW, Raviskanthan S, Lee AG, Whyte AT, Gombos DS, Al-Zubidi N. Ophthalmoplegia Associated With Extramedullary Multiple Myeloma: Case Series From a Tertiary Cancer Center. J Neuroophthalmol 2024:00041327-990000000-00543. [PMID: 38175728 DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000002076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant disorder of plasma cells that results in tumor cells replacing the bone marrow. In extramedullary MM (EMM), however, tumor cells proliferate outside the bone marrow. EMM may produce ophthalmoplegia through direct invasion of the superior orbital fissure, cavernous sinus, and/or sphenoidal sinus. Several mechanisms have been proposed including cranial nerve palsies, direct infiltration of bone, extraocular muscle metastasis, myelomatous meningitis, and parenchymal or paraneoplastic effects. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 7 patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who suffered from ophthalmoplegia secondary to extramedullary MM between 2019 and 2021. We collected information regarding the symptoms, signs, radiographic and laboratory findings, management, complications, and prognosis of these patients throughout their disease course. RESULTS Skull base MRI revealed 4 patients with ophthalmoplegias secondary to superior orbital fissure invasion, 2 patients with ophthalmoplegias secondary to cavernous sinus invasion, and 1 patient with ophthalmoplegia secondary to sphenoid sinus invasion. CONCLUSIONS This is a case series describing 7 patients with ophthalmoplegias secondary to EMM. Our article is unique because of the size of the included cohort, which is large when compared with most English language publications detailing such ophthalmoplegias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ujalashah Dhanani
- Section of Ophthalmology (UD, ATW, DSG, NA-Z), Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and Department of Ophthalmology (PWM, SR, AGL), Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lewis K, Gombos DS, Saboo US. Lenticular Anomaly Masking as a Ciliary Body Cyst. Ophthalmology 2023; 130:1347. [PMID: 36792448 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Lewis
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ujwala S Saboo
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pike SB, Reid MW, Peng CC, Chang C, Xu BY, Gombos DS, Patel S, Xu L, Berry JL. A multicentre analysis of nucleic acid quantification using aqueous humour liquid biopsy in uveal melanoma: implications for clinical testing. Can J Ophthalmol 2023:S0008-4182(23)00342-3. [PMID: 38036045 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2023.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Uveal melanoma (UM) tumour biopsy is limited by size and intratumour heterogeneity. We explored the potential of aqueous humour (AH) liquid biopsy for UM by quantifying analytes in samples collected at diagnosis and after brachytherapy to look for clinical correlations with tumour features. DESIGN Case-series study. PARTICIPANTS Sixty-six UM patients and 16 control subjects from a tertiary care hospital. METHODS The study included 119 UM AH samples and 16 control samples analyzed for unprocessed analytes (i.e., dsDNA, miRNA, and protein) using Qubit fluorescence assays. RESULTS Analytes were widely quantifiable among available UM AH samples (dsDNA: 94.1%; miRNA: 88.0%; protein: 95.2%) at significantly higher concentrations than among control samples (dsDNA, p = 0.008; miRNA, p < 0.0001; protein, p = 0.007). In samples taken at diagnosis, concentrations were higher at more advanced American Joint Cancer Commission stages; when comparing most advanced stage III with least advanced stage I, median dsDNA was 4 times greater (p < 0.0001), miRNA was 2 times greater (p = 0.001), and protein was 3 times greater (p < 0.0001). Analytes were quantifiable in >70% of diagnostic samples from eyes with tumours <2 mm tall. Height had a positive association with diagnostic analyte concentrations (dsDNA: R = 0.43, p = 0.0007; miRNA: R = 0.35, p = 0.01; protein: R = 0.39, p = 0.005). Samples taken after brachytherapy showed significantly higher concentrations than diagnostic samples (p < 0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS UM AH is a rich repository of analytes. Samples from eyes with more advanced stage and larger tumours had higher concentrations, though analytes also were quantifiable in eyes with smaller, less advanced tumours. Future analysis of AH analytes may be informative in the pursuit of personalized UM treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Pike
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, Calif.; Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Mark W Reid
- Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.; Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Chen-Ching Peng
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, Calif.; Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.; Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Christina Chang
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Benjamin Y Xu
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Sapna Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex
| | - Liya Xu
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, Calif.; Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.; Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Jesse L Berry
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, Calif.; Vision Center, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.; Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif..
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ameri M, Whyte AT, Raza SM, Gombos DS, Al-Zubidi N. Spontaneous Debulking of a Large Skull Base Mass. J Neuroophthalmol 2023:00041327-990000000-00491. [PMID: 37889587 DOI: 10.1097/wno.0000000000002022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- May Ameri
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (MA), Houston, Texas; and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (ATW, SMR, DSG, NA-Z), Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ameri M, Al Zubidi N, Razmandi A, Whyte A, Naing A, Patel NA, Gombos DS. Ocular Toxicity Profile of Targeted Cancer Therapy (TCT) at a US Tertiary Cancer Center. Cureus 2023; 15:e40597. [PMID: 37347077 PMCID: PMC10279808 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Targeted cancer therapy (TCT) is a significant advancement in oncology with promising survival improvement in patients with cancer and remarkable effects on various cancers. There is evidence suggesting a connection between specific TCT classes and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Our study aims to investigate the potential ocular toxicities of different classes of TCT, provide a better understanding of these toxicities, and aid in the future development of screening and management recommendations for ocular irAEs. DESIGN Retrospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS Only ocular immune-related AEs were included in the study; patients on TCT who received a new ophthalmic diagnosis were seen at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. METHODS Between 2010 and 2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 6,354 patients on TCT at a large US tertiary cancer center. Results: The criteria for data analysis were met by 1861 patients. TCT was associated with a wide range of class-specific ocular irAEs. There was a statistically significant correlation between ocular toxicity with polytherapy with a p-value of <0.001. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant correlation between toxicity and BRAF, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and ICI <0.001, <0.001, and 0.006, respectively. Conclusion: Our cohort is the most extensive case series in English literature, demonstrating the increased risk of class-specific ocular toxicity associated with TCT, which sheds some light on the importance of developing standardized grading criteria and management guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moe Ameri
- Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA
| | - Nagham Al Zubidi
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics / Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Azadeh Razmandi
- Ophthalmology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Andrew Whyte
- Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Nimisha A Patel
- Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loya A, Ayaz T, Gombos DS, Weng CY. Association of choroidal invasion with retinoblastoma survival rates. J AAPOS 2023; 27:32.e1-32.e8. [PMID: 36610585 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the impact of varying levels of choroidal invasion on survival from retinoblastoma. METHODS A retrospective nationwide analysis of retinoblastoma cases diagnosed between 2004-2016 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was conducted. Overall survival, cause-specific survival, and all-cause mortality risk were assessed as primary outcomes. RESULTS A total of 393 retinoblastoma patients were included, of whom 268 (68.2%) had no choroidal invasion, 91 (23.2%) had focal choroidal invasion, and 34 (8.7%) had massive choroidal invasion on enucleation. A total of 6 deaths occurred throughout an average follow-up period of 72.2 ± 47.1 months: 4 deaths were cancer related. Adjusted Cox regression demonstrated higher all-cause mortality in patients with massive choroidal invasion (HR, 41.29; 95% CI, 4.05-420.49; P = 0.002) relative to those without choroidal invasion; however, those with focal choroidal invasion (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 0.17-43.09; P = 0.484) demonstrated no difference in all-cause mortality. On further stratification by level of optic nerve invasion (ONI), all cancer-related deaths (4/4) were found to have occurred in patients with massive choroidal invasion and concomitant postlaminar ONI (PLONI). Patients with massive choroidal invasion without PLONI demonstrated 5-year overall and cause-specific survival of 100%, whereas patients with massive choroidal invasion and PLONI demonstrated 5-year overall and cause-specific survival of 80.2%. CONCLUSIONS All retinoblastoma-related deaths occurred in patients with both massive choroidal invasion and PLONI. These findings could not establish that massive choroidal invasion is an independent risk factor for poor outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asad Loya
- Baylor College of Medicine, School of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Talha Ayaz
- University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, Houston, Texas; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas; University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Galveston, Texas; Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cancer Medicine, Houston, Texas; Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology - Cullen Eye Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina Y Weng
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology - Cullen Eye Institute, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mazharuddin AA, Whyte AT, Gombos DS, Patel N, Razmandi A, Chaudhry AL, Al-Zubidi NS. Highlights on Ocular Toxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors at a US Tertiary Cancer Center. J Immunother Precis Oncol 2022; 5:98-104. [PMID: 36483585 PMCID: PMC9714419 DOI: 10.36401/jipo-22-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved prognosis in advanced malignancies; however, they may be associated with extensive ocular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that are sight threatening. Our study aimed to identify the presentation, characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes of ocular irAEs. METHODS In this retrospective, observational case series, we reviewed the medical records of 1280 patients at a large US tertiary cancer center between 2010 and 2020. RESULTS We identified 130 patients who presented with ocular irAEs (10%) with 69 males (53%) and 61 females (47%). The mean time to toxicity was 6.1 months. Adverse events include corneal toxicity (31%), neuro-ophthalmic (14%), uveitis and scleritis (13%), retinopathy (13%), periocular disorders (11%), and others. IrAEs occurred most frequently with nivolumab (26%). Most ocular irAEs were treated with topical therapy. Advanced cases required systemic corticosteroids and even cessation of ICIs. CONCLUSION Our cohort is a large case series highlighting the increased potential of ocular toxicity associated with ICIs. Prompt recognition and management of ocular irAEs can minimize their effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anam A. Mazharuddin
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew T. Whyte
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dan S. Gombos
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nimisha Patel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Azadeh Razmandi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amina L. Chaudhry
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nagham S. Al-Zubidi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Becnel M, Ferreri CJ, Feng L, Richards TA, Horowitz SB, Patel N, Gombos DS, Razmandi A, Murga A, Seif S, Youssef G, Murphy K, Kaufman GP, Weber DM, Patel KK, Thomas SK, Manasanch EE, Orlowski RZ, Lee HC. Retrospective, single-center, real-world experience of belantamab mafodotin in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.8060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8060 Background: Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) is a BCMA antibody drug conjugate approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients (pts) based on the pivotal phase 2 DREAMM-2 study (Lonial et al, Lancet Oncology, 2019), which demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 32%, median progression free survival (PFS) of 2.8 months, and overall survival (OS) of 13.7 months in triple class (proteasome inhibitor, IMiD, and anti-CD38) refractory (TCR) MM. In this single-center retrospective study, we report the efficacy and safety of belamaf in RRMM pts administered in a real-world, standard of care (SOC) setting. Methods: All MM pts who initiated therapy with SOC belamaf, either as monotherapy or in combination, between 11/1/2020 and 11/30/2021 at MD Anderson were included in this study. Response and progression were evaluated using International Myeloma Working Group standard criteria. Keratopathy and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) adverse events (AEs) were graded per the Keratopathy and Visual Acuity (KVA) scale. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to event endpoints. Results: A total of 39 consecutive pts with a median of 7 prior lines of therapy were included in the analysis, of whom 37 pts (95%) received single agent belamaf. Median age was 66 years (range 39-89), 14 of 37 (38%) pts with available FISH had high risk disease (del 17p, t(4;14, and/or t(14;16)), 14 pts (36%) had extramedullary disease, 37 (95%) pts were TCR, 32 (82%) pts were TCR and alkylator-refractory, and 8 pts (21%) were BCMA-refractory. Notably, the majority (69%) of pts in this analysis would have been ineligible for the DREAMM-2 trial based on key eligibility criteria. Median number of belamaf doses administered was 2 (range 1-9). Among 37 pts with measurable, response evaluable baseline disease, the best ORR (≥ PR) was 27% with ≥ VGPR of 3%. The clinical benefit rate (≥ MR) was 35%. Among 8 BCMA-refractory pts, there was 1 PR and 1 MR. Median PFS was 1.8 months and median OS was 9.2 months with a median follow-up of 10.1 months. Median duration of response has not been reached among 10 responding pts. Among 33 pts with a post-treatment ocular exam, 25 pts (76%) developed any grade keratopathy (Grade 1/2/3/4, 9%/55%/12%/0%, respectively) and BCVA changes (Grade 1/2/3/4, 42%/27%/6%/0%, respectively). Median time to first keratopathy or BCVA AE was 1.3 months. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (75%) and AEs (9%). Conclusions: Our current study in heavily pretreated RRMM pts, of whom the majority would have been ineligible for the DREAMM-2 study, demonstrates an ORR, PFS, and ocular AE profile with SOC belamaf therapy comparable to outcomes reported in the pivotal registration study. Future studies are needed to further define the optimal use and sequencing of belamaf in MM pts, particularly in context of other BCMA-targeting modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melody Becnel
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Houston, TX
| | | | - Lei Feng
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Dan S. Gombos
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Donna M. Weber
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Houston, TX
| | - Krina K. Patel
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sheeba K. Thomas
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Hans C. Lee
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McVay K, Sheth R, Murthy R, Gombos DS, Carter BW, Bhosale P, Tahon NH, Balmes GC, Coz YM, Washington E, Rodrigues D, Wachter EA, Patel SP. Metabolic complete responses (mCR) in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) treated with image-guided injection (IGI) of PV-10. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9543 Background: Traditional CT imaging can underestimate the degree of anti-cancer treatment effect due to reliance on morphological changes of visualized tumors. In contrast, PET imaging offers information on metabolic activity using a positron emitting radiolabeled agent (e.g. FDG) but is less sensitive to changes in tumor size. FDG-PET images acquired, co-registered, and superimposed on CT images (PET-CT) allow spatial detection of anti-cancer activity. Moreoever, FDG-PET-CT can provide information regarding anti-tumor immune responses in patients receiving immunotherapy. Rose bengal (PV-10) is a small molecule autolytic immunotherapy in development for metastatic disease. When administered by intralesional injection, PV-10 can produce immunogenic cell death and a T-cell mediated immune response against treatment-refractory and immunologically-cold tumors. Herein, we report the FDG-PET-CT imaging responses of 7 metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients who received percutaneous image-guided injection (IGI) of PV-10 into hepatic tumors. Methods: The Phase 1 study is evaluating safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intralesional PV-10 in hepatic tumors. PV-10 is administered percutaneously via IGI into designated tumors ≤4.9 cm in diameter. Response is assessed at Day 28, then every 3 months, using CT/MRI or PET-CT. Patients with multiple tumors may receive further IGI of PV-10 after Day 28. Results: To date, 25 mUM patients with liver metastases have been treated; 16 patients received standard of care immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) during or post PV-10 treatment. Seven subjects had FDG-PET-CT imaging during the study (baseline 1, follow-up 6). Two follow-up FDG-PET-CTs were performed 1 and 3 years after PV-10 injection with intervening ICI, and another was 1.5 years after PV-10, without any follow-on treatment. Four patients experienced mCR in all metastatic sites, including extrahepatic metastasis. Conclusions: FDG-PET-CT shows that PV-10 is capable of inducing mCR in injected (adscopal) and non-injected (abscopal) lesions. This pattern of response is suggestive of immunogenic cell death in mUM patients with liver metastases. Clinical trial information: NCT00986661.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krysta McVay
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rahul Sheth
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ravi Murthy
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dan S. Gombos
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brett W. Carter
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Priya Bhosale
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Gener C Balmes
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ysabell M Coz
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Patel VR, Gombos DS, Admirand J, Ghafoori SD. Partial spontaneous regression of choroidal melanoma: A case image with histopathology and gene expression profiling. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2022; 26:101517. [PMID: 35496766 PMCID: PMC9048143 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
12
|
Loya A, Gombos DS, Patel SP. Second Primary Malignancies in Patients With Melanoma Subtypes: Analysis of 120,299 Patients From the SEER Database (2000-2016). Front Oncol 2022; 12:853076. [PMID: 35372013 PMCID: PMC8972193 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.853076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeEvaluate incidence of second primary malignancies (SPM) after non-acral cutaneous melanoma (NACM), acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM), mucosal melanoma (MM), and uveal melanoma (UM).Patients and MethodsFirst primary NACM, ALM, MM, and UM cases diagnosed 2000-2016 were extracted from SEER. Seer*Stat was used to calculate excess absolute risks (EAR) and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) of SPMs relative to a matched cohort from the general population. P-value of 0.05 determined significance.ResultsInclusion criteria was met by 109,385 patients with NACM, 2166 with ALM, 2498 with MM, and 6250 with UM. Increased incidence of malignancies occurred after NACM (SIR 1.51; 95%CI, 1.49-1.54), ALM (SIR 1.59; 95%CI, 1.40-1.81), MM (SIR 2.14; 95%CI, 1.85-2.45), and UM (SIR 1.24; 95%CI, 1.14-1.34) relative to the general population. Cutaneous melanoma occurred more frequently after NACM (SIR 9.54; 95%CI, 9.27-9.83), ALM (SIR 12.19; 95%CI, 9.70-15.14), MM (SIR 10.05; 95%CI, 7.18-13.68), and UM (SIR 2.91; 95%CI, 2.27-3.66). Patients with initial NACM (SIR 2.44; 95%CI, 1.64-3.51) and UM (SIR 44.34; 95%CI, 29.91-63.29) demonstrated increased incidence of eye and orbit melanoma. Renal malignancies occurred more frequently after NACM (SIR 1.24; 95%CI, 1.11-1.38), MM (SIR 3.54; 95%CI, 1.62-6.72) and UM (SIR 1.68; 95%CI, 1.09-2.48). Increased incidence of thyroid malignancies was observed after NACM (SIR 1.83; 95%CI, 1.61-2.06), ALM (SIR 3.74; 95%CI, 1.71-7.11), MM (SIR 4.40; 95%CI, 1.77-9.06), and UM (SIR 3.79; 95%CI, 2.52-5.47). Increased incidence of lymphoma was observed after NACM (SIR 1.20; 95%CI, 1.09-1.31) and ALM (SIR 2.06; 95%CI, 1.13-3.46).ConclusionPatients with NACM, ALM, MM, and UM have increased incidence of SPMs compared to that expected from the general population. Each of these melanoma subtypes had increased occurrence of cutaneous melanoma and thyroid cancer; some, but not all, had increased occurrence of renal malignancies, eye and orbit melanoma, and lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asad Loya
- School of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Dan S. Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cancer Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Sapna P. Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- *Correspondence: Sapna P. Patel,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lin SH, Lin HY, Verma V, Xu-Welliver M, Thall PF, Yao L, Kim PY, Gombos DS, Kawedia JD, Komaki R, Gomez DR, Nguyen QN, O'Reilly MS, Lu C, Fossella FV, Skoulidis F, Zhang J, Tsao AS, Heymach JV, Blumenschein GR. Phase I Trial of Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Trametinib for KRAS-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 30:100514. [PMID: 35051703 PMCID: PMC9259763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This phase I trial (NCT01912625) evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) and the radiosensitizer trametinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) for KRAS-mutated nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Patients received cCRT (carboplatin/paclitaxel and 60 Gy/30 fractions radiotherapy); oral trametinib (7 days/week) commenced on day 1 and completed on the final day of radiotherapy. Dose-finding of trametinib was done using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM); dose levels were 0.5mg (level -1), 1mg (initial, level 1), 1.5mg (level 2), and 2mg (level 3). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were also recorded. RESULTS Fifteen patients (stage III, variety of KRAS mutations) were treated, with 1/5/4/5 at dose levels -1/1/2/3, respectively. Five patients received dose reductions (n=2, levels 2 and 3; n=1, level 1). Twelve patients completed the full cCRT course. One patient (following 12d trametinib) was taken off protocol for an unrelated/unresolved grade 1 event and later experienced grade 5 sepsis/respiratory failure. There was one grade 4 retinal detachment; grade 3 events included skin rash (n=2) and ventricular dysfunction, pneumonitis, pain, fatigue, and diarrhea (n=1 each). The final dose selected by the TiTE-CRM of trametinib was 1.5 mg. Pharmacokinetic profiles were elucidated and extensively described. At median follow-up of 70 months, median PFS was 11 months and median OS was 38 months. CONCLUSIONS The MTD for trametinib when combined with cCRT is 1.5 mg, with encouraging preliminary outcomes. This combination merits further study to combine with consolidation durvalumab in non-metastatic KRAS mutant NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Heather Y Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Meng Xu-Welliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Peter F Thall
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luyang Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter Y Kim
- Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jitesh D Kawedia
- Clinical Pharmacy Research, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ritsuko Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael S O'Reilly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charles Lu
- Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frank V Fossella
- Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ferdinandos Skoulidis
- Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anne S Tsao
- Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John V Heymach
- Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George R Blumenschein
- Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Al-Zubidi N, Page JC, Gombos DS, Srivastava A, Appelbaum E, Gidley PW, Chambers MS, Nader ME. Immune-Related Oral, Otologic, and Ocular Adverse Events. Adv Exp Med Biol 2022; 1342:399-416. [PMID: 34972977 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-79308-1_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Emerging immunotherapeutic agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), have revolutionized cancer treatment. The first immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4, was approved in 2011. Since then, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved more than half a dozen immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat various malignancies. These agents are part of a broader class of chemotherapy agents termed immunotherapy, which selectively target different steps in the immune response cascade to upregulate the body's normal response to cancer. While the effects of traditional chemotherapy are well known, the toxicity profile of emerging immune therapies is not fully elucidated. They have been associated with atypical side effects labeled collectively as immune-related adverse events (irAEs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nagham Al-Zubidi
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Cody Page
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Akanksha Srivastava
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric Appelbaum
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul W Gidley
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark S Chambers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marc-Elie Nader
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Singareeka Raghavendra A, Kwiatkowski D, Damodaran S, Kettner NM, Ramirez DL, Gombos DS, Hunt K, Shen Y, Keyomarsi K, Tripathy D. Phase I safety and efficacy study of autophagy inhibition with hydroxychloroquine to augment the antiproliferative and biological effects of preoperative palbociclib plus letrozole for estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.1067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1067 Background: Endocrine therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor is standard of care for patients (pts) with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative MBC, yet resistance ultimately develops. We have shown that low doses of palbociclib activates autophagy, which reverses initial G1 cell cycle arrest. High concentrations of palbociclib induce senescence, but these are off target effects of the drug. The autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) induces senescence at a lower (i.e. on-target) continuous dosing of palbociclib, in in vitro and in vivo models. This strategy is being tested in a phase I/II trial (NCT03774472). Results from the phase I portion are reported here. Methods: The phase I part of this study uses a dose escalation 3+3 design testing HCQ, 400, 600 and 800 mg daily (6 pts at 800 mg) with continuously dosed palbociclib at 75 mg and letrozole 2.5 mg daily. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) includes any study drug-related grade ≥ 3 nonhematological (lab) toxicity. Responding pts may continue on therapy beyond 8 weeks for up to 52 weeks. Primary objective is to determine safety, tolerability and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of HCQ. Secondary objectives are overall tumor response and time to progression. Eligible pts are ≥18 years of age, postmenopausal (ovarian suppression allowed) with ER+/HER2-negative MBC, ECOG performance status score of ≤1 and with adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function. Response is assessed per RECIST v1.1. Results: Between 9/24/18 and 12/15/20, 14 pts were evaluable for safety. Median age was 41 with Asian (1, 7.1%), Black (2, 14.3%) White (11, 78.6%) patients enrolled. No DLTs were observed. One pt progressed during the DLT period and 2 withdrew consent (one during the DLT period); two pts were replaced for DLT assessment. Reasons for coming off study were grade 3 skin toxicity (1), per protocol at 8 weeks (non-measurable or pt/physician preference, 9), and (2) full duration treatment at 50 and 52 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 were hematologic (29), metabolism/nutrition (2), musculoskeletal/ connective tissue (1), and skin/subcutaneous tissue (3), with no serious AEs reported. The percent of palbociclib doses held per pt due to neutrophil level ranged from 0-37.5% with no apparent relation to HCQ dose. Best response was partial (2) stable (11); and progression (1). For measurable disease, tumor decreases of 11%, 12%, 21%, 26%, 30%, 55% and increase in 1 pt by 55% were seen. Conclusions: This phase I study showed acceptable safety and no HCQ dose-toxicity relationship. The RP2D of HCQ is 800 mg/day with continuous dosing palbociclib at 75 mg/day and letrozole at 2.5 mg/day. The phase 2 trial will proceed in the neoadjuvant setting, with Ki67 proliferative index response as the primary endpoint. Clinical trial information: NCT03774472 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Dan S. Gombos
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kelly Hunt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yu Shen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Debu Tripathy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Berry JL, Munier FL, Gallie BL, Polski A, Shah S, Shields CL, Gombos DS, Ruchalski K, Stathopoulos C, Shah R, Jubran R, Kim JW, Mruthyunjaya P, Marr BP, Wilson MW, Brennan RC, Chantada GL, Chintagumpala MM, Murphree AL. Response criteria for intraocular retinoblastoma: RB-RECIST. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e28964. [PMID: 33624399 PMCID: PMC8049511 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Standardized guidelines for assessing tumor response to therapy are essential for designing and conducting clinical trials. The Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) provide radiological standards for assessment of solid tumors. However, no such guidelines exist for the evaluation of intraocular cancer, and ocular oncology clinical trials have largely relied on indirect measures of therapeutic response-such as progression-free survival-to evaluate the efficacy of treatment agents. Herein, we propose specific criteria for evaluating treatment response of retinoblastoma, the most common pediatric intraocular cancer, and emphasize a multimodal imaging approach for comprehensive assessment of retinoblastoma tumors in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse L. Berry
- The Vision Center at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Francis L. Munier
- Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Brenda L. Gallie
- Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Molecular Genetics & Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ashley Polski
- The Vision Center at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sona Shah
- The Vision Center at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carol L. Shields
- Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dan S. Gombos
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kathleen Ruchalski
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Christina Stathopoulos
- Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Rachana Shah
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Rima Jubran
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan W. Kim
- The Vision Center at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Prithvi Mruthyunjaya
- Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford Byers Eye Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Brian P. Marr
- Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew W. Wilson
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rachel C. Brennan
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Guillermo L. Chantada
- Hemato-Oncology Service, Hospital JP Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - A. Linn Murphree
- The Vision Center at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Al-Zubidi N, Gombos DS, Hong DS, Subbiah V, Fu S, Ahnert JR, Piha-Paul SA, Tsimberidou AM, Karp DD, Bernstam FM, Naing A. Overview of Ocular Side Effects of Selinexor. Oncologist 2021; 26:619-623. [PMID: 33728727 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this review is to elucidate the type and frequency of ocular adverse events associated with selinexor with a goal to quantify the occurrence of these events in our investigator-initiated trial. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 174 patients treated with at least one dose of selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents between July 2015 and July 2020 at a comprehensive cancer center in the U.S. All reported ocular adverse events were assessed. RESULTS A total of 174 patient medical records were reviewed. All patients received at least one dose of selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents in our cohort of patients with advanced malignancies. A total of 34 (19.54%) patients experienced 37 ocular adverse events. The most frequently reported ocular symptom was blurred vision, which was reported in 22 (12.64%) patients. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event was dry eye syndrome reported in 21 (12.1%) patients, and 19 (10.9%) of them were diagnosed with mild dry eye. The second most common treatment-related adverse event was the progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis (cataract) reported in 7 (4.0%) patients. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight that ocular adverse events associated with oral selinexor were mild. The most frequently reported ocular treatment-related adverse events were mild dry eye and progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Patients receiving selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents were reviewed, with a total of 34 patients experiencing 37 ocular adverse events. Findings highlight that ocular adverse events associated with oral selinexor were mild. The most frequently reported ocular treatment-related adverse events were mild dry eye and progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nagham Al-Zubidi
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Siqing Fu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jordi Rodon Ahnert
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarina A Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel D Karp
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Funda Meric Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sharma A, Riaz KM, Gill MS, Patnaik A, Ulahannan SV, Wang JS, Gombos DS, Ang Q, Cicic D, Bergonio GR, Zhang C, Wirostko BM. Reversible HER2 antibody-drug conjugate-induced ocular toxicity. Can J Ophthalmol 2021; 57:118-126. [PMID: 33727105 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report 3 cases of reversible epitheliopathy induced by A166-a human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapy for resistant HER2 tumours. METHODS Advanced HER2 tumour patients were enrolled in A166 phase I/II clinical trial using Bayesian logistic regression model dose escalation. Key exclusion criteria were ≥grade 2 (G2) corneal pathology, severe organ disease, and other cancer therapy within 4 weeks. Eye exams were performed at baseline, regularly scheduled intervals, and additionally upon A166-induced ocular symptoms. Topical therapy with autologous serum tears (ASTs) was implemented based on visual acuity, symptoms, and slit lamp exam. A166 was withheld if ≥G2 ocular toxicity developed; if status improved to ≤G1, A166 therapy was resumed. Visual acuity, corneal exam, and subjective comfort were recorded. RESULTS After ≥2 cycles of A166, 6 eyes of 3/23 enrolled patients developed whorl pattern epitheliopathy suggestive of limbal stem cell (LSC) dysfunction requiring cessation of A166 despite positive tumour response. Patients 1 and 3 received 3.6 mg/kg A166 dose, and patient 2 received 3.0 mg/kg. Topical steroids (2/4 eyes) failed to improve epitheliopathy. Adding ASTs improved vision, ocular comfort, and whorl pattern epitheliopathy in 6/6 eyes within 3 weeks. Patient 1 continues to improve on ASTs; patient 2 withdrew from the study; and patient 3 resumed A166 therapy. CONCLUSION A166 precipitates LSC dysfunction-like epitheliopathy. Combination therapy including aggressive lubrication, withholding drug, and ASTs help reverse toxicity. Recognizing that ADC-induced epitheliopathy can respond to ocular management may enable cancer patients to continue lifesaving therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kamran M Riaz
- Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Okla..
| | - Mohsain S Gill
- University of Oklahoma Medical School, Oklahoma City, Okla
| | - Amita Patnaik
- South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics, San Antonio, Tex
| | - Susanna V Ulahannan
- The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Oklahoma City, Okla
| | - Judy S Wang
- Florida Cancer Specialists/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Sarasota, Fla
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bindiganavile SH, Bhat N, Lee AG, Gombos DS, Al-Zubidi N. Targeted Cancer Therapy and Its Ophthalmic Side Effects: A Review. J Immunother Precis Oncol 2021; 4:6-15. [PMID: 35664825 PMCID: PMC9161666 DOI: 10.36401/jipo-20-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Targeted cancer therapy agents are the latest development in cancer therapeutics. Although the spectrum of their use continues to expand, ocular side effects are frequently encountered with the use of cancer therapeutics. This review describes the ocular side effects of targeted cancer therapy agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nita Bhat
- Department of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew G. Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- The Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- Texas A and M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dan S. Gombos
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nagham Al-Zubidi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- The Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Qin Y, Bollin K, de Macedo MP, Carapeto F, Kim KB, Roszik J, Wani KM, Reuben A, Reddy ST, Williams MD, Tetzlaff MT, Wang WL, Gombos DS, Esmaeli B, Lazar AJ, Hwu P, Patel SP. Immune profiling of uveal melanoma identifies a potential signature associated with response to immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:jitc-2020-000960. [PMID: 33203661 PMCID: PMC7674090 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To date, no systemic therapy, including immunotherapy, exists to improve clinical outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) patients. To understand the role of immune infiltrates in the genesis, metastasis, and response to treatment for UM, we systematically characterized immune profiles of UM primary and metastatic tumors, as well as samples from UM patients treated with immunotherapies. Methods Relevant immune markers (CD3, CD8, FoxP3, CD68, PD-1, and PD-L1) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry on 27 primary and 31 metastatic tumors from 47 patients with UM. Immune gene expression profiling was conducted by NanoString analysis on pre-treatment and post-treatment tumors from patients (n=6) receiving immune checkpoint blockade or 4-1BB and OX40 dual costimulation. The immune signature of UM tumors responding to immunotherapy was further characterized by Ingenuity Pathways Analysis and validated in The Cancer Genome Atlas data set. Results Both primary and metastatic UM tumors showed detectable infiltrating lymphocytes. Compared with primary tumors, treatment-naïve metastatic UM showed significantly higher levels of CD3+, CD8+, FoxP3+ T cells, and CD68+ macrophages. Notably, levels of PD-1+ infiltrates and PD-L1+ tumor cells were low to absent in primary and metastatic UM tumors. No metastatic organ-specific differences were seen in immune infiltrates. Our NanoString analysis revealed significant differences in a set of immune markers between responders and non-responders. A group of genes relevant to the interferon-γ signature was differentially up-expressed in the pre-treatment tumors of responders. Among these genes, suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 was identified as a marker potentially contributing to the response to immunotherapy. A panel of genes that encoded pro-inflammatory cytokines and molecules were expressed significantly higher in pre-treatment tumors of non-responders compared with responders. Conclusion Our study provides critical insight into immune profiles of UM primary and metastatic tumors, which suggests a baseline tumor immune signature predictive of response and resistance to immunotherapy in UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Qin
- Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Kathryn Bollin
- Medical Oncology, Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Fernando Carapeto
- Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kevin B Kim
- Center for Melanoma Research and Treatment, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jason Roszik
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Khalida M Wani
- Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexandre Reuben
- Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sujan T Reddy
- Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michelle D Williams
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Orbital Oncology & Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pelster MS, Gruschkus SK, Bassett R, Gombos DS, Shephard M, Posada L, Glover MS, Simien R, Diab A, Hwu P, Carter BW, Patel SP. Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Results From a Single-Arm Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol 2020; 39:599-607. [PMID: 33125309 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Metastatic uveal melanoma has poor overall survival (OS) and no approved systemic therapy options. Studies of single-agent immunotherapy regimens have shown minimal benefit. There is the potential for improved responses with the use of combination immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a phase II study of nivolumab with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Any number of prior treatments was permitted. Patients received nivolumab 1 mg/kg and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg for four cycles, followed by nivolumab maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. The primary outcome of the study was overall response rate (ORR) as determined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 33 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 18%, including one confirmed complete response and five confirmed partial responses. The median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 9.5 months), and the median OS was 19.1 months (95% CI, 9.6 months to NR). Forty percent of patients experienced a grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSION The combination regimen of nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrates activity in metastatic uveal melanoma, with deep and sustained confirmed responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith S Pelster
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephen K Gruschkus
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Roland Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Shephard
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Liberty Posada
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maura S Glover
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rinata Simien
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brett W Carter
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Maniakas A, Jozaghi Y, Zafereo ME, Sturgis EM, Su SY, Gillenwater AM, Gidley PW, Lewis CM, Diaz E, Goepfert RP, Kupferman ME, Gross ND, Hessel AC, Pytynia KB, Nader M, Wang JR, Lango MN, Kiong KL, Guo T, Zhao X, Yao CMKL, Appelbaum E, Alpard J, Garcia JA, Terry S, Flynn JE, Bauer S, Fournier D, Burgess CG, Wideman C, Johnston M, You C, De Luna R, Joseph L, Diersing J, Prescott K, Heiberger K, Mugartegui L, Rodriguez J, Zendehdel S, Sellers J, Friddell RA, Thomas A, Khanjae SJ, Schwarzlose KB, Chambers MS, Hofstede TM, Cardoso RC, Wesson RA, Won A, Otun AO, Gombos DS, Al‐Zubidi N, Hutcheson KA, Gunn GB, Rosenthal DI, Gillison ML, Ferrarotto R, Weber RS, Hanna EY, Myers JN, Lai SY. Head and neck surgical oncology in the time of a pandemic: Subsite-specific triage guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Head Neck 2020; 42:1194-1201. [PMID: 32342541 PMCID: PMC7267348 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 pandemic has strained human and material resources around the world. Practices in surgical oncology had to change in response to these resource limitations, triaging based on acuity, expected oncologic outcomes, availability of supportive resources, and safety of health care personnel. METHODS The MD Anderson Head and Neck Surgery Treatment Guidelines Consortium devised the following to provide guidance on triaging head and neck cancer (HNC) surgeries based on multidisciplinary consensus. HNC subsites considered included aerodigestive tract mucosa, sinonasal, salivary, endocrine, cutaneous, and ocular. RECOMMENDATIONS Each subsite is presented separately with disease-specific recommendations. Options for alternative treatment modalities are provided if surgical treatment needs to be deferred. CONCLUSION These guidelines are intended to help clinicians caring for patients with HNC appropriately allocate resources during a health care crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to advocate for individual consideration of cases in a multidisciplinary fashion based on individual patient circumstances and resource availability.
Collapse
|
23
|
Pelster M, Forget MA, Gruschkus SK, Haymaker CL, Bernatchez C, Hwu P, Amaria RN, Gombos DS, Patel SP. Successful tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) growth from uveal melanoma (UM) using a three-signal (3.0) method. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.3027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3027 Background: Metastatic UM is a rare cancer with poor response rates to systemic therapy. Adoptive transfer of patient-specific TIL may represent the best strategy for treatment. TIL are harvested from primary or metastatic tumors and initially expanded in culture with high dose IL-2 prior to undergoing rapid expansion protocol and therapeutic administration. Here, we report improved rates of initial expansion using a previously described TIL 3.0 method which utilizes dual agonistic antibodies to TCR and 4-1BB (Urelumab) for stimulation, respectively, with high dose IL-2, compared to the traditional method. Methods: Between 2006 and 2019, patients were consented for TIL harvest from either primary or metastatic UM tumors. Demographics, clinical features, and outcomes of the TIL initial expansion were collected. Success rates, number of cells expanded, and days in culture for the two methods were analyzed using partially overlapping samples t-tests and z-tests. Results: There were 85 harvests and expansions from 76 patients using the traditional method and 32 expansions from 30 patients using TIL 3.0. Initial TIL expansion was successful in 97% of TIL 3.0 harvests compared to 35% for the traditional method (p < 0.001). More TIL were expanded with TIL 3.0 compared to the traditional method (291.3 million cells vs. 88.6 million cells, p < 0.001), and fewer days were required in culture (18.5 vs. 29.0, p < 0.001). Both primary UM harvests and metastatic harvests were more successful with TIL 3.0 (90% vs. 12% for primary, p < 0.001, and 100% vs. 42% for metastatic, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Expansion of UM tumors via the TIL 3.0 method led to successful growth in 97% of harvests. Therapeutic administration to patients with TIL 3.0 is under active investigation. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Dan S. Gombos
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Skalet AH, Allen RC, Shields CL, Wilson MW, Mruthyunjaya P, Gombos DS. Considerations for the Management and Triage of Ocular Oncology Cases during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2020; 6:1-4. [PMID: 32411697 PMCID: PMC7206351 DOI: 10.1159/000507734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alison H Skalet
- Casey Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Richard C Allen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.,Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carol L Shields
- Ocular Oncology Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew W Wilson
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Dan S Gombos
- The Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.,Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.,Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chévez-Barrios P, Milman T, Grossniklaus HE, Folberg R, Salomão DR, Gombos DS. Ocular Pathology Recommendations during COVID-19 from the American Association of Ophthalmic Oncologists and Pathologists (AAOOP). Ocul Oncol Pathol 2020; 6:1-2. [PMID: 32411696 PMCID: PMC7206350 DOI: 10.1159/000507735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tatyana Milman
- Wills Eye Hospital and Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Robert Folberg
- Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Dan S Gombos
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pelster M, Gruschkus SK, Bassett R, Gombos DS, Shephard M, Posada L, Glover M, Diab A, Hwu P, Patel SP. Phase II study of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) in metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.9522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9522 Background: UM is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Approximately 40-50% of patients (pts) with UM will ultimately develop metastatic disease. There is currently no standard approach for metastatic UM. Early studies of single agent immunotherapy (IO) in metastatic UM have yielded meager results. Combination checkpoint inhibitor IO has the potential to improve response rates and survival. Herein, we report the safety and efficacy of ipi/nivo in metastatic UM. Methods: We performed a single-arm phase II study in metastatic UM (CA184-187) for pts with at least 1 measureable lesion and ECOG PS 0-1. Any number of prior treatments were permitted. Pts received nivolumab 1mg/kg IV plus ipilimumab 3mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses; maintenance nivolumab was dosed 3mg/kg every 2 weeks or 480mg IV every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was best overall response rate (BORR) as determined by irRC. Secondary endpoints were median progression free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and one-year OS. Results: As of the January 31, 2019 data cutoff, 39 pts were enrolled. 35 pts received at least one treatment and were evaluable for toxicity. 5 pts were inevaluable for response due to lack of follow-up imaging, leaving 30 pts evaluable for efficacy. 32 pts (91%) experienced any adverse event (AE), and 29 pts (83%) experienced any treatment related AE (TRAE). Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 14 pts (40%). 10 pts (29%) were removed from the study due to AEs. There were no treatment-related deaths. Median duration of follow up is 60.5 weeks. 19 pts (63%) completed all 4 cycles of ipi/nivo; median duration of treatment was 16 weeks. The BORR was partial response for 5 pts (17%), stable disease (SD) for 16 pts (53%), and progression of disease for 9 pts (30%). 8 pts had SD for at least 6 months. Median PFS was 26 weeks. Median OS was 83 weeks (1.6 years), and one-year OS was 62%. Conclusions: Full results of ipi/nivo safety and efficacy including immune-related AE and clinical characteristics of the responders will be presented at the meeting. Preliminary translational tumor work including RNA analysis has been performed on a subset of responders. Clinical trial information: NCT01585194.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Roland Bassett
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dan S. Gombos
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Liberty Posada
- University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Adi Diab
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Alexander A, Marx AN, Reddy SM, Reuben JM, Le-Petross HC, Lane D, Huang ML, Krishnamurthy S, Gong Y, Gombos DS, Patel N, Tung CI, Allen RC, Kandl TJ, Wu J, Liu S, Patel AB, Futreal A, Wistuba I, Layman RM, Valero V, Tripathy D, Ueno NT, Lim B. Abstract OT3-05-04: Phase II study of atezolizumab, cobimetinib, and eribulin in patients with recurrent or metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-ot3-05-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: IBCs that do not completely respond to chemotherapy often have dysregulated immune pathways, and novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes in recurrent/metastatic disease. One-third of IBCs express the atezolizumab target PD-L1, and cobimetinib increases PD-L1 expression; thus, we hypothesize that atezolizumab and cobimetinib may act synergistically in IBC. The FDA-approved agent eribulin is active in IBC and has anti-stem cell activity and can reverse the IBC phenotype of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Hence the use of eribulin as a chemotherapy backbone in combination with other novel agents is well justified.
Trial Design: This single-arm, open-label trial is enrolling patients with recurrent IBC or de novo metastatic IBC that has progressed on at least 1 line of standard chemotherapy. During a 4-week pharmacodynamic window, patients have an upfront biopsy, receive atezolizumab and cobimetinib treatment for 4 weeks, and have a second biopsy. Triple-combination treatment then commences, with standard eribulin dosing. After 4 cycles of eribulin, patients receive maintenance targeted therapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Eligibility Criteria: Patients with metastatic IBC of any molecular subtype must have measurable disease (per RECIST 1.1) amenable to biopsy. Patients with HER2+ disease must have received both pertuzumab and T-DM1. Patients with treated stable brain metastases are allowed. Patients must have recovered from the acute effects of any prior therapies and have adequate hematologic, organ, and cardiac function. Patients with autoimmune diseases or a history of pneumonitis are ineligible.
Specific Aims: The primary objective is to determine the overall response rate (ORR) of the combination therapy. Secondary objectives include determining the safety and tolerability, clinical benefit rate, response duration, progression-free survival, 2-year overall survival rate and predictive biomarker analyses.
Statistical Methods: The trial will enroll up to 9 patients in its phase I/safety lead-in portion and up to 33 patients total. A Bayesian optimal interval design is used to efficiently determine the maximum tolerated cobimetinib dose in phase I. Patients start cobimetinib at the FDA-approved dose of 60 mg/day with a target toxicity rate is 0.3. Phase II will enroll 24 patients to determine the efficacy of the triple-combination therapy. The historical ORR in metastatic IBC is 10%; our sample size provides 80% power to detect an ORR improvement to 25%.
Accrual: The trial has enrolled 7 patients since its start in August 2017.
Citation Format: Alexander A, Marx AN, Reddy SM, Reuben JM, Le-Petross HC, Lane D, Huang ML, Krishnamurthy S, Gong Y, Gombos DS, Patel N, Tung CI, Allen RC, Kandl TJ, Wu J, Liu S, Patel AB, Futreal A, Wistuba I, Layman RM, Valero V, Tripathy D, Ueno NT, Lim B. Phase II study of atezolizumab, cobimetinib, and eribulin in patients with recurrent or metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-05-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Alexander
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - AN Marx
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - SM Reddy
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - JM Reuben
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - HC Le-Petross
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - D Lane
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - ML Huang
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Y Gong
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - DS Gombos
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - N Patel
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - CI Tung
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - RC Allen
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - TJ Kandl
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - J Wu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - S Liu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - AB Patel
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - A Futreal
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - I Wistuba
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - RM Layman
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - V Valero
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - D Tripathy
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - NT Ueno
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - B Lim
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Smith JR, Pe'er J, Belfort RN, Cardoso F, Carvajal RD, Carvalho C, Coupland SE, Desjardins L, Francis JH, Gallie BL, Gombos DS, Grossniklaus HE, Heegaard S, Jager MJ, Kaliki S, Ksander BR, Maeurer M, Moreno E, Pulido JS, Ryll B, Singh AD, Zhao J, Parreira A, Wilson DJ, O'Brien JM. Proceedings of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology and Champalimaud Foundation Ocular Oncogenesis and Oncology Conference. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2019; 8:9. [PMID: 30652059 PMCID: PMC6333107 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.8.1.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The 2018 Ocular Oncogenesis and Oncology Conference was held through a partnership of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) and the Champalimaud Foundation. Twenty-one experts from international ocular oncology centers, from the Champalimaud Clinical Centre and the Champalimaud Foundation Cancer Research Program, and from patient advocacy organizations, delivered lectures on subjects that ranged from global ocular oncology, to basic research in mechanisms of ocular malignancy, to clinical research in ocular cancers, and to anticipated future developments in the area. The scientific program of the conference covered a broad range of ocular tumors-including uveal melanoma, retinoblastoma, ocular surface tumors, and adnexal and intraocular lymphomas-and pathogenesis and management were deliberated in the context of the broader systemic cancer discipline. In considering the latest basic and clinical research developments in ocular oncogenesis and oncology, and providing the opportunity for cross-talk between ocular cancer biologists, systemic cancer biologists, ocular oncologists, systemic oncologists, patients, and patient advocates, the forum generated new knowledge and novel insights for the field. This report summarizes the content of the invited talks at the 2018 ARVO-Champalimaud Foundation Ocular Oncogenesis and Oncology Conference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine R. Smith
- Eye & Vision Health, Flinders University College of Medicine & Public Health, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jacob Pe'er
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Rubens N. Belfort
- Ophthalmology Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Champalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Richard D. Carvajal
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carlos Carvalho
- Champalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sarah E. Coupland
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool and Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jasmine H. Francis
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brenda L. Gallie
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, SickKids Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Dan S. Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hans E. Grossniklaus
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Steffen Heegaard
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martine J. Jager
- Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Swathi Kaliki
- Operation Eyesight Universal Institute for Eye Cancer, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India
| | - Bruce R. Ksander
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Markus Maeurer
- Champalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Eduardo Moreno
- Champalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jose S. Pulido
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bettina Ryll
- Melanoma Patient Network Europe, Knivsta, Sweden
| | - Arun D. Singh
- Department of Ophthalmic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Junyang Zhao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - António Parreira
- Champalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - David J. Wilson
- Casey Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Joan M. O'Brien
- Scheie Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jonasch E, McCutcheon IE, Gombos DS, Ahrar K, Perrier ND, Liu D, Robichaux CC, Villarreal MF, Weldon JA, Woodson AH, Pilie PG, Fuller GN, Waguespack SG, Matin SF. Pazopanib in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease: a single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:1351-1359. [PMID: 30236511 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30487-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Revised: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No approved systemic therapy exists for von Hippel-Lindau disease, an autosomal dominant disorder with pleiotropic organ manifestations that include clear cell renal cell carcinomas; retinal, cerebellar, and spinal haemangioblastomas; pheochromocytomas; pancreatic serous cystadenomas; and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. We aimed to assess the activity and safety of pazopanib in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. METHODS In this non-randomised, single-centre, open-label, phase 2 trial, adult patients with clinical manifestations of von Hippel-Lindau disease were recruited from the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) and were treated with pazopanib (800 mg orally daily) for 24 weeks, with an option to continue treatment if desired by the patient and treating physician. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response and safety in the per-protocol population. The objective response was measured for each patient and each lesion type. Radiographic assessments were done at baseline and every 12 weeks throughout the study. Activity and safety were assessed with continuous monitoring and a Bayesian design. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01436227, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between Jan 18, 2012, and Aug 10, 2016, we screened 37 patients with genetically confirmed or clinical features consistent with von Hippel-Lindau disease, of whom 31 eligible patients were treated with pazopanib. The proportion of patients who achieved an objective response was 42% (13 of 31 patients). By lesion sites responses were observed in 31 (52%) of 59 renal cell carcinomas, nine (53%) of 17 pancreatic lesions, and two (4%) of 49 CNS haemangioblastomas. Seven (23%) of 31 patients chose to stay on the treatment after 24 weeks. Four (13%) of 31 patients withdrew from the study because of grade 3 or 4 transaminitis, and three (10%) discontinued study treatment because of treatment intolerance with multiple intercurrent grade 1-2 toxicities. Treatment-related serious adverse events included one case each of appendicitis and gastritis and one patient had a fatal CNS bleed. INTERPRETATION Pazopanib was associated with encouraging preliminary activity in von Hippel-Lindau disease, with a side-effect profile consistent with that seen in previous trials. Pazopanib could be considered as a treatment choice for patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease and growing lesions, or to reduce the size of unresectable lesions in these patients. The safety and activity of pazopanib in this setting warrants further investigation. FUNDING Novartis Inc and NIH National Cancer Institute core grant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kamran Ahrar
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nancy D Perrier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Diane Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christine C Robichaux
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mercedes F Villarreal
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Justin A Weldon
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ashley H Woodson
- Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick G Pilie
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory N Fuller
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven G Waguespack
- Department of Endocrinology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
D'souza NM, Nguyen HD, Smith SV, Nagarajan P, Diab A, Allen RC, Gombos DS, Lee AG. Metastatic Melanoma of the Optic Nerve Sheath. Neuroophthalmology 2017; 42:187-190. [PMID: 29796055 DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2017.1372488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A 23-year-old man with a history of metastatic melanoma developed painful vision loss to counting fingers with enhancement of optic nerve on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and received a diagnosis of optic neuritis from an outside hospital. Despite empiric corticosteroid therapy, the patient worsened and developed secondary central retinal vein occlusion with further deterioration of vision. Repeat MRI demonstrated optic nerve sheath (ONS) involvement suggestive of optic perineuritis (OPN) and an ONS biopsy confirmed a rare case of isolated metastatic melanoma. Our case highlights the clinical and radiographic features that can mimic OPN and delay diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stacy V Smith
- Department of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Priyadharsini Nagarajan
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard C Allen
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew G Lee
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.,Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.,Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jonasch E, Gombos DS, Waguespack SG, Marcott V, Liu DD, Weldon JA, Bird S, Robichaux C, Tannir NM, Woodson AH, Fuller G, McCutcheon IE, Matin SF. Phase II study of pazopanib in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.4516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4516 Background: Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder. Affected individuals develop vascular neoplastic lesions in multiple sites including eye, brain, pancreas, adrenal and kidney. Standards of care include surveillance imaging and surgical intervention. We hypothesized that treatment of VHL related lesions with an antiangiogenic agent would result in shrinkage of all lesion types. We chose the multikinase inhibitor pazopanib to test this hypothesis. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, patients with clinical features or genetic confirmation of VHL disease and with measurable lesions were treated with pazopanib 800mg PO daily for two 12-week cycles. Efficacy was determined by RECIST after two cycles. Patients had the option to continue therapy if considered in patient’s best interest. Continuous monitoring for any lesion progression and drug discontinuation due to toxicity during the whole period of the treatment was planned. Results: Patients were enrolled (N=32) and treated (N=31) between 1/2012 and 6/2016. Median age was 37 (range 19-67). 23 patients had genomically confirmed VHL disease; four had family and personal history but had not undergone genetic testing, and five patients had clinical features of VHL disease and negative genetic testing. A median of two cycles (range 1-12) of therapy was administered. Of 31 evaluable patients, 13 (42%) showed a response, 18 patients had stable disease and no patients had PD as best response. Responses were seen in renal (2 CR and 29 PR/59 total), pancreatic (9 PR/17 total) and CNS 2 PR/49 total) target lesions. The most common side effect was diarrhea (grades 1 and 2) experienced in 14 patients. Twelve patients dose reduced to 600 mg and 6 to 400 mg pazopanib PO daily. Eight patients discontinued therapy due to adverse events of whom 4 experienced transaminitis. One patient experienced a grade V CNS hemorrhage. Conclusions: This is the largest prospective VHL disease specific therapeutic study performed to date. Pazopanib resulted in significant and sustained disease control for the majority of VHL patients enrolled on the study, with an acceptable safety profile. This agent may be considered as an alternative to surgical intervention in patients with VHL disease. Clinical trial information: NCT01436227.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Jonasch
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dan S. Gombos
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Valerie Marcott
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Diane D Liu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Shelly Bird
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Nizar M. Tannir
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Greg Fuller
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Surena F. Matin
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Amram AL, Rico G, Kim JW, Chintagumpala M, Herzog CE, Gombos DS, Chévez-Barrios P. Vitreous Seeds in Retinoblastoma: Clinicopathologic Classification and Correlation. Ophthalmology 2017; 124:1540-1547. [PMID: 28528011 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 04/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A recent classification scheme for retinoblastoma vitreous seeds has shown promise in predicting treatment response. For the first time, we correlate this clinical classification scheme with its histopathologic features. DESIGN Retrospective review. PARTICIPANTS Enucleated eyes received at the pathology department of the Retinoblastoma Center of Houston from 2010 to 2015. METHODS Macroscopic photographs of the enucleated eyes of patients with retinoblastoma were analyzed to select those with vitreous seeds. Cases with adequate material for clinicopathologic correlation were selected for further analysis, and clinical photographs were reviewed. Routine histopathologic slides were reviewed and compared with the clinical and macroscopic photographs. Seeds were classified as type 1 ("dust"), type 2 ("sphere"), or type 3 ("cloud"). To confirm the presence of macrophages, CD68 immunohistochemical staining was used. Synaptophysin was used to stain retinoblastoma cells. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES To correlate clinical vitreous seed type with histopathologic features. RESULTS A total of 14 eyes with adequate amounts of tumor seeds along with clinical and macroscopic photographic correlation were selected from a total of 138 eyes reviewed. Type 1 seeds consisted of individual viable tumor cells and scattered macrophages. Type 2 seeds consisted of 2 submorphologies: spheres with viable cells throughout and spheres with an outer rim of viable cells but necrotic cells centrally. Type 3 seeds were composed of more than 90% necrotic material admixed with few macrophages and viable cells at their outer rim. Untreated (8/14) and previously treated (6/14) eyes showed similar histopathologic features for each type of seeds. Treated eyes had more type 1 and 3 seeds. CONCLUSIONS We provide the first histopathologic correlation of the clinical classification scheme for vitreous seeds in retinoblastoma. "Dust" is formed by scattered single cells alternating with macrophages. "Spheres" with translucent centers contain multiple layers of viable tumor cells that shed single cells and may be more clinically aggressive. "Cloud" seeds are mostly composed of necrotic material, explaining their lack of therapeutic response. Pretreated eyes showed tumor seeds morphologically similar to untreated eyes. Knowledge of the underlying histopathology of vitreous seed types is a fundamental component of classification and may aid in understanding clinical response to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec L Amram
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
| | - Grecia Rico
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Jonathan W Kim
- Retinoblastoma Service, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California
| | - Murali Chintagumpala
- Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, Houston, Texas; Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Cynthia E Herzog
- Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, Houston, Texas; Department of Pediatrics Patient Care, Division of Pediatrics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, Houston, Texas; Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patricia Chévez-Barrios
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas; Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, Houston, Texas; Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York; Department of Ophthalmology, Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Qin Y, Petaccia de Macedo M, Reuben A, Forget MA, Haymaker C, Bernatchez C, Spencer CN, Gopalakrishnan V, Reddy S, Cooper ZA, Fulbright OJ, Ramachandran R, Wahl A, Flores E, Thorsen ST, Tavera RJ, Conrad C, Williams MD, Tetzlaff MT, Wang WL, Gombos DS, Esmaeli B, Amaria RN, Hwu P, Wargo JA, Lazar AJ, Patel SP. Parallel profiling of immune infiltrate subsets in uveal melanoma versus cutaneous melanoma unveils similarities and differences: A pilot study. Oncoimmunology 2017; 6:e1321187. [PMID: 28680759 PMCID: PMC5486182 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2017.1321187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The low response rates to immunotherapy in uveal melanoma (UM) sharply contrast with reputable response rates in cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients. To characterize the mechanisms responsible for resistance to immunotherapy in UM, we performed immune profiling in tumors from 10 metastatic UM patients and 10 metastatic CM patients by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Although there is no difference in infiltrating CD8+ T cells between UM and CM, a significant decrease in programmed death-1 (PD-1)-positive lymphocytes was observed and lower levels of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in UM metastases compared with CM metastases. Tumors from metastatic UM patients showed a lower success rate of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) growth compared with metastatic CM (45% vs. 64% success), with a significantly lower quantity of UM TIL expanded overall. These studies suggest that UM and CM are immunologically distinct, and provide potential explanation for the impaired success of immunotherapy in UM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Qin
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mariana Petaccia de Macedo
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexandre Reuben
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marie-Andrée Forget
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christine N Spencer
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Sujan Reddy
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zachary A Cooper
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Orenthial J Fulbright
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Renjith Ramachandran
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arely Wahl
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Esteban Flores
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shawne T Thorsen
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rene J Tavera
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michelle D Williams
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery and The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Milgrom SA, Cheah CY, Pinnix CC, Smith GL, Dabaja BS, Horace P, Chevez-Barrios P, Fowler NH, Gombos DS. Acute and late toxicity of bilateral orbital irradiation in the management of primary intraocular lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2016; 57:2612-8. [PMID: 27075636 PMCID: PMC6047351 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2016.1166490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is a rare malignancy with poor outcomes. Concerns regarding toxicity lead some clinicians to exclude orbital radiation therapy (RT). We aimed to quantify the ocular toxicity of RT in 11 PIOL patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy and bilateral orbital RT (median 36 Gy). A multidisciplinary team, including an ocular oncologist, followed patients for a median of 42 months after RT. Common adverse events included dermatitis (100%), conjunctivitis (82%), xerophthalmia (64%), and keratopathy (45%). All phakic eyes developed cataracts (100%); correction resulted in good vision recovery. New, visually significant retinopathy was observed in only one eye (<5%) and affected a patient with preexisting diabetes. This report suggests that severe, vision-threatening complications following orbital RT are uncommon. In the absence of comorbidities, orbital RT should not be withheld due to fear of vision-threatening toxicity. The risk of toxicity may be augmented by comorbidities, so an individualized approach is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Milgrom
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Chan Y Cheah
- b Department of Medical Oncology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Patricia Horace
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | | | - Nathan H Fowler
- b Department of Medical Oncology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Dan S Gombos
- d Department of Ophthalmology , MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Akinfenwa PY, Chévez-Barrios P, Harper CA, Gombos DS. Late Presentation of Retinoblastoma in a Teen with Aicardi Syndrome. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2016; 2:181-4. [PMID: 27239462 DOI: 10.1159/000439595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2015] [Accepted: 08/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Retinoblastoma (Rb) generally presents in children <8 years of age. Aicardi syndrome (AS) is a congenital, neurodevelopmental disorder that has been associated with various ophthalmic abnormalities, but no reports have related it to a delayed presentation of Rb. This report describes the late presentation of Rb in a teenage patient with AS and suggests modifications in ophthalmic screening to facilitate early detection. METHODS A chart review was conducted of a patient with AS. We examined the ophthalmic history, fundus images and B-scan ultrasonography. Histopathological analysis was conducted on globe sections. RESULTS The patient's ophthalmic history was consistent with normal findings of AS: fundus images and B-scan ultrasonography revealed chorioretinal lacunae and an area of retinal detachment, respectively. The patient presented with chronic irritation and mydriasis of the blind left eye. This was enucleated as treatment. Histopathology revealed a focally differentiated Rb. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that the tumor cells were positive for synaptophysin and negative for the wild-type Rb protein, and a high Ki-67 proliferation index was shown. CONCLUSION Our patient was diagnosed with Rb at age 16. AS has been associated with numerous ophthalmic findings, but this is the first report relating it to a late Rb presentation. Meticulous ophthalmic examinations should be considered through the teenage years and early adulthood of AS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Y Akinfenwa
- Interdepartmental Translational Biology and Molecular Medicine Graduate Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex., USA; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex., USA; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex., USA
| | - Patricia Chévez-Barrios
- Interdepartmental Translational Biology and Molecular Medicine Graduate Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex., USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex., USA; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex., USA; Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Tex., USA; Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Tex., USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Tex., USA; Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, N.Y., USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, N.Y., USA
| | | | - Dan S Gombos
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex., USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex., USA; Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex., USA; Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Tex., USA; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Tex., USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Even though less than 1% of uveal melanoma patients are found to have radiographic or clinical evidence of distant disease at the time of treatment for their intraocular disease, they carry a lifetime risk of disease recurrence, with approximately 50% of patients ultimately developing fatal metastases. Despite this significant risk, there is no consensus within the ophthalmologic or oncologic community regarding the role of surveillance for detection of metastatic disease in these patients. The lack of consensus is due to the notable absence of clear data regarding the best radiologic or serum surveillance modalities, the optimal frequency of testing, or the ideal length of follow-up. Given the ability to assess prognosis by cytogenetics, gene expression profiling, or other methods, questions remain about whether surveillance strategies should be tailored by level of risk. Importantly, no survival benefit from the early detection of asymptomatic disease in uveal melanoma has been documented, resulting in controversy over the value of routine surveillance and advocacy from some clinicians to forego surveillance altogether. However, there are several factors supporting surveillance: the patient's enhanced emotional well-being, the potential to identify oligometastatic disease amenable to surgery or other local therapies, decreased morbidity/complications from advanced disease, and identification of patients eligible for clinical trials that assess novel therapies for advanced uveal melanoma. The selection of surveillance modality used varies according to local expertise and resources and may include serum markers (liver function tests and others) and/or imaging (chest x-ray, abdominal ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine H Francis
- From the Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Section of Ophthalmology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Melanoma and Sarcoma Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Garcia JR, Gombos DS, Prospero CM, Ganapathy A, Penland RL, Chévez-Barrios P. Expression of Angiogenic Factors in Invasive Retinoblastoma Tumors Is Associated With Increase in Tumor Cells Expressing Stem Cell Marker Sox2. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 139:1531-8. [DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0262-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Context
Progression of retinoblastoma is associated with increased tumor angiogenesis. However, a clear relationship between the expression of angiogenic markers in specific regions of the tumor and tumor progression has not been established. This study investigates the association between angiogenic factors in retinoblastomas with choroidal and/or optic nerve invasion (high-risk/invasive retinoblastoma) and expression of Sox2, a stem cell marker.
Objective
To investigate the association between the expression of angiogenic factors and markers of tumor invasiveness, such as the stem cell marker Sox2, in retinoblastoma tissues.
Design
Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate coexpression of the angiogenic growth factors vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR-2), and endoglin (CD105); markers of glial differentiation (vimentin and glial fibrillary acidic protein); and a neural stem cell marker (Sox2). Expression was assessed in nonneoplastic and neoplastic ocular tissues collected from enucleated eyes of patients with retinoblastoma. During qualitative data interpretation, evaluating pathologists were masked to patient grouping.
Results
Expression of VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 in noninvasive (non–high-risk feature) retinoblastoma tumors was lower than in the invasive, or high-risk feature tumors. Moreover, our data indicate that the tumor cells, and not the surrounding stroma, secrete VEGF-A and that angiogenesis is mostly localized to the iris. Finally, our data showed that the expression of the neural stem cell marker Sox2 is associated with eyes with increased VEGF-A expression and tumor invasiveness.
Conclusions
Increased expression of angiogenic factors, with a concomitant increase in expression of the stem cell marker Sox2 observed in retinoblastoma tissues, may partially explain the aggressiveness of these tumors. The complex interaction of angiogenic and stem cell–related pathways in these tumors, especially in high-risk feature retinoblastoma, suggests that targeting tumor cells capable of secreting vasculogenic factors, as well as proangiogenic genes and signaling pathways, may be necessary for development of effective antimetastatic retinoblastoma drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús R. Garcia
- From Escuela de Biotecnología y Alimentos and Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Monterrey, México, and Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas (Mr Garcia); the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, and Retinoblastoma Center of Houston, Houston, Texas (Dr Gombos); the
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cheah CY, Milgrom S, Chihara D, Gombos DS, Pinnix CC, Dabaja BS, Fowler NH. Intensive chemoimmunotherapy and bilateral globe irradiation as initial therapy for primary intraocular lymphoma. Neuro Oncol 2015; 18:575-81. [PMID: 26487691 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary intraocular lymphoma is a rare variant of primary CNS lymphoma for which the optimum treatment strategy remains unknown. METHODS We performed a retrospective single-center study including patients who underwent uniform management from October 2007 in which patients were offered sequential rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) followed by binocular radiotherapy and consolidative high-dose cytarabine. RESULTS Eleven patients with median age 66 years (range, 48-72) were included. All patients received binocular radiotherapy to a median dose of 36 Gy (range, 30.6-39.6) in 20 fractions. Grade 3+ anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia occurred in 1 (9%), 2 (18%), and 3 (27%) patients, respectively; raised creatinine and peripheral sensory neuropathy occurred in 4 (36%) and 3 (27%) patients, respectively. Grade 3+ ocular toxicities included cataract formation and keratitis in 6 (54%) and 3 (27%) patients, respectively. Ten patients (91%) achieved complete response and 1 (9%) partial response. After median follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 1.8-7.6), the median progression-free survival was 3.8 years and the estimated 4-year overall survival was 75.8% (95% CI: 30.5%-93.7%). The initial site of disease progression was the CNS in 4 of 7 patients (57%) and within the eye in 3 of 7 (43%). Five patients achieved responses to salvage therapies. CONCLUSIONS Combined modality treatment with R-MPV, binocular radiation, and high-dose cytarabine is effective with moderate toxicity. Both local and CNS relapses occur; however, the achievement of second and subsequent remissions is possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Yoon Cheah
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (C.Y.C., D.C., N.H.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (S.M., C.C.P., B.S.D.); Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (D.S.G.)
| | - Sarah Milgrom
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (C.Y.C., D.C., N.H.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (S.M., C.C.P., B.S.D.); Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (D.S.G.)
| | - Dai Chihara
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (C.Y.C., D.C., N.H.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (S.M., C.C.P., B.S.D.); Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (D.S.G.)
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (C.Y.C., D.C., N.H.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (S.M., C.C.P., B.S.D.); Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (D.S.G.)
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (C.Y.C., D.C., N.H.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (S.M., C.C.P., B.S.D.); Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (D.S.G.)
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (C.Y.C., D.C., N.H.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (S.M., C.C.P., B.S.D.); Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (D.S.G.)
| | - Nathan H Fowler
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (C.Y.C., D.C., N.H.F.); Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (S.M., C.C.P., B.S.D.); Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (D.S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dan S Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Takiar V, Voong KR, Gombos DS, Mourtada F, Rechner LA, Lawyer AA, Morrison WH, Garden AS, Beadle BM. A choice of radionuclide: Comparative outcomes and toxicity of ruthenium-106 and iodine-125 in the definitive treatment of uveal melanoma. Pract Radiat Oncol 2015; 5:e169-e176. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2014] [Revised: 09/05/2014] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
41
|
Takiar V, Gombos DS, Mourtada F, Rechner LA, Lawyer AA, Morrison WH, Garden AS, Beadle BM. Disease control and toxicity outcomes using ruthenium eye plaque brachytherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma. Pract Radiat Oncol 2013; 4:e189-94. [PMID: 25012839 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2013] [Revised: 07/29/2013] [Accepted: 08/09/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ruthenium-106 ((106)Ru) eye plaques have the potential to achieve excellent tumor control with acceptable radiation toxicity. We evaluated our experience in the management of uveal melanoma treated with (106)Ru brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS The records of 40 patients with uveal melanoma treated with brachytherapy using (106)Ru plaques from 2003 to 2007 at University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed. Endpoints assessed included tumor control and toxicity. RESULTS Median ophthalmologic follow-up was 67 months. Actuarial 5-year rates of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 97%, 94%, and 92%. There were 3 deaths, 2 related to melanoma. Fifteen patients experienced clinically significant visual loss; no patients were diagnosed with neovascular glaucoma, and 1 patient developed a clinically significant radiation-associated cataract. No patient required enucleation. CONCLUSIONS We report the largest published US cohort of patients treated with (106)Ru plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma. Tumor control was excellent, and toxicity was acceptably low. These data support the reintroduction of (106)Ru into clinical practice for ocular melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinita Takiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dan S Gombos
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christiana Care Health System, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Wilmington, Delaware and Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laura A Rechner
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ann A Lawyer
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - William H Morrison
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Beth M Beadle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abràmoff M, Abrams GW, Agarwal A, Ai E, Aiello LM, Aiello LP, Albert DM, Aschbrenner MW, Ávila M, Aylward GW, Bedell M, Belfort R, Bennett J, Bergstrom C, Besirli CG, Bhende PS, Binder S, Bird AC, Blodi BA, Blumenkranz MS, Boldt HC, Bornfeld N, Bottoni F, Boulton ME, Bowne SJ, Brantley MA, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Bringmann A, Brinton DA, Brown GC, Brown JC, Brunner S, Bush RA, Cao D, Capone A, Carruthers D, Cavallerano JD, Chakravarthy U, Chan CC, Chan W, Charles S, Charteris DG, Chen DF, Chen J, Chen Y, Cheung CYL, Chew EY, Chiang A, Chiang MF, Constable IJ, Coscas G, Cruess AF, Cunningham ET, Curcio CA, Daiger SP, Damato BE, Davis JL, Davis MD, Day S, De Potter P, de Smet MD, Denniston AK, Dhaliwal RS, Ding X, Do DV, Dou G, Dunn WA, Ehlers JP, Engelbert M, Faia LJ, Falsini B, Fawzi AA, Fekrat S, Feldon SE, Fernandes RAB, Ferreyra HA, Ferrington DA, Ferris FL, Finger PT, Fisher SK, Fishman GA, Fleckenstein M, Flynn HW, Fok AC, Foulds WS, Freeman WR, Freton A, Friedlander M, Frishman LJ, Fu AD, Garcia Filho CADA, Garcia-Valenzuela E, Gaudric A, Gayed M, Genead MA, Gerding H, Giani A, Goldberg MF, Gombos DS, Gopal L, Gordon C, Goto H, Gragoudas ES, Grant MB, Green WR, Gregg RG, Gregor Z, Gregori G, Gregory-Evans K, Grob S, Groenewald C, Grossniklaus HE, Grover S, Gullapalli VK, Gupta A, Guthoff RF, Hahn P, Haller JA, Harbour JW, Haritoglou C, Hartnett ME, Hawkins BS, He S, Herwig MC, Heussen FM, Hinton DR, Holz FG, Houston SK, Hui YN, Humayun MS, Ikuno Y, Isaac D, Ishibashi T, Jabs DA, Jaffe GJ, Jampol LM, Joffe L, Johnson M, Johnson MW, Johnson RN, Joussen AM, Julian K, Jumper JM, Kaiser PK, Kampik A, Katamay R, Kay CN, Keane PA, Kenney MC, Khaderi KR, Khodair MA, Kim IK, Kim TW, Kirchhof B, Klein BE, Klein R, Konstantinidis L, Kozak I, Kuppermann BD, Labriola LT, Lai TY, Lam DS, Lam LA, Landers MB, Lane AM, Lavik EB, Leary JF, Lee SY, Lee TC, Leung LSB, Lewis DA, Lewis GP, Leys A, Li X, Liakopoulos S, Lin CP, Lin P, Liu DT, London NJ, Lujan BJ, Luo Y, Lutty GA, MacLaren R, Madreperla S, Maguire AM, Mainster MA, Mansfield NC, Markoe AM, Marmor MF, Martin DF, Massey SC, McCall MA, McCannel TA, McCutchan JA, McDonald HR, Mehta MP, Meier P, Merbs S, Meredith TA, Meyer CH, Mieler WF, Miller JW, Mirza RG, Mitter SK, Mittra RA, Miyake Y, Montemagno C, Moshiri A, Mruthyunjaya P, Muccioli C, Mullins RF, Murata T, Murphree AL, Murphy RP, Murray PI, Murray TG, Nagpal M, Namperumalsamy P, Nanda SK, Nguyen QD, Nussenblatt RB, Oh KT, Ohji M, Ohno-Matsui K, Palanker D, Patel PS, Pavlick AC, Peereboom DM, Pennesi ME, Pepose JS, Perry JD, Puliafito CA, Quiram PA, Raman R, Ramchandran RS, Rao HV, Rao NA, Rao PK, Rathinam SR, Recchia FM, Redmond KJ, Reh TA, Reichenbach A, Ritch R, Rosenfeld PJ, Rubin GS, Ruiz-Garcia H, Ryan SJ, Sadda SR, Sadun AA, Sakamoto T, Sampath AP, Schachat AP, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Schwartz SG, Scott AW, Sebag J, Seddon JM, Sen HN, Sepah YJ, Sharma S, Sharma T, Sheu SJ, Shields CL, Shields JA, Shinoda K, Shukla D, Sieving PA, Silva PA, Silveira C, Singh AD, Smith SB, Smith WM, Sobrin L, Sodhi A, Sohn EH, Soubrane G, Spielberg L, Srivastava SK, Stachs O, Staurenghi G, Sternberg P, Stone EM, Sugino IK, Sullivan LS, Sullivan P, Sun JK, Sunness JS, Tadayoni R, Tang S, Terasaki H, Thomas MA, Thompson JT, Thumann G, Toth CA, Trese MT, Tsai JH, Turell ME, Turner PL, Udar N, Ulrich JN, Van Gelder RN, van Meurs JC, Vasconcelos-Santos DV, Vavvas DG, Vemulakonda GA, Wang H, Wang Y, Weiland JD, Weleber RG, Wharam MD, Wickham L, Wiedemann P, Wiley HE, Wilkinson C, Wilson DJ, Wolfensberger TJ, Wong D, Wong IY, Wong TY, Wu DM, Yandiev Y, Yang CH, Yang CM, Yannuzzi LA, Yasuda M, Yeh PT, Yehoshua Z, Yiu G, Yoon YH, Yu HG, Yuan A, Zarbin MA, Zhang JJ, Zhang K, Zhao M, Zhou P. Contributors. Retina 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4557-0737-9.00159-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
43
|
Lee TC, Gombos DS, Harbour JW, Mansfield NC, Murphree AL. Retinoblastoma. Retina 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4557-0737-9.00128-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Ameri
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Retinoblastoma is a rare primary intraocular malignancy. Presentation in the neonatal period is not common. With improved genetic testing, screening of the unborn child and neonate is taking on a greater role in the management of these patients. Treatment of retinoblastoma in the neonate is complex and requires a multidisciplinary and highly individualized approach. If possible, focal modalities should be used and external beam radiation avoided. Systemic intravenous chemotherapy may be necessary with regimens including carboplatin, vincristine and etoposide. Such cases are best managed by specialist centers with access to experts in oncology, ophthalmology, radiation therapy, genetics, pathology and anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan S Gombos
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Texas Children's Cancer Center, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1445, Houston, Texas 77030-4009, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hwang CK, Aaberg TM, Chevez-Barrios P, Verner-Cole E, Gombos DS, Paysse E, Chintagumpala M, Gao W, Grossniklaus HE. Residual intraretinal retinoblastoma after chemoreduction failure. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012; 130:246-8. [PMID: 22332223 DOI: 10.1001/archopthalmol.2011.1588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher K Hwang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jonasch E, McCutcheon IE, Waguespack SG, Wen S, Davis DW, Smith LA, Tannir NM, Gombos DS, Fuller GN, Matin SF. Pilot trial of sunitinib therapy in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. Ann Oncol 2012; 22:2661-2666. [PMID: 22105611 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease induces vascular neoplasms in multiple organs. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in VHL patients and examined the expression of candidate receptors in archived tissue. METHODS Patients with VHL were given four cycles of 50 mg sunitinib daily for 28 days, followed by 14 days off. Primary end point was toxicity. Modified RECIST were used for efficacy assessment. We evaluated 20 archival renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and 20 hemangioblastomas (HBs) for biomarker expression levels using laser-scanning cytometry (LSC). RESULTS Fifteen patients were treated. Grade 3 toxicity included fatigue in five patients. Dose reductions were needed in 10 patients. Eighteen RCC and 21 HB lesions were evaluable. Six of the RCCs (33%) responded partially, versus none of the HBs (P = 0.014). LSC revealed that mean levels of phosphorylated vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 were lower in HB than in RCC endothelium (P = 0.003) and mean phosphorylated fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate-2 (pFRS2) levels were higher in HB (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Sunitinib treatment in VHL patients showed acceptable toxicity. Significant response was observed in RCC but not in HB. Greater expression of pFRS2 in HB tissue than in RCC raises the hypothesis that treatment with fibroblast growth factor pathway-blocking agents may benefit patients with HB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Jonasch
- Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology.
| | | | | | - S Wen
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - L A Smith
- Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology
| | - N M Tannir
- Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology
| | | | | | - S F Matin
- Urology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rich TA, Jonasch E, Matin S, Waguespack SG, Gombos DS, Santarpia L, Stolle C, Jimenez C. A novel von Hippel-Lindau point mutation presents as apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma. Cancer Invest 2008; 26:642-6. [PMID: 18584357 DOI: 10.1080/07357900701802527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Von Hippel Lindau disease is a common cause of apparently sporadic pheochromocytomas. Herein, we describe a 20-year-old man with an apparently sporadic pheochromocytoma associated with a novel, relatively conservative germline Gly104Val VHL gene mutation, which is localized within exon 1 of the VHL gene corresponding to the beta -domain of the VHL protein (pVHL). The nearly asymptomatic patient's father also carries the same mutation. Similar to other mutations localized in the same codon, the Gly104Val VHL mutation seems to have an attenuated disease phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thereasa A Rich
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4009, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
Gombos DS, Hungerford J, Abramson DH, Kingston J, Chantada G, Dunkel IJ, Antoneli CBG, Greenwald M, Haik BG, Leal CA, Medina-Sanson A, Schefler AC, Veerakul G, Wieland R, Bornfeld N, Wilson MW, Yu CBO. Secondary acute myelogenous leukemia in patients with retinoblastoma: is chemotherapy a factor? Ophthalmology 2007; 114:1378-83. [PMID: 17613328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2006] [Revised: 03/26/2007] [Accepted: 03/27/2007] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe a series of patients with secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML) and retinoblastoma (RB). DESIGN Retrospective observational cases series. PARTICIPANTS Ocular and pediatric oncologists at referral centers in Europe and the Americas and the RB databases at the National Institutes of Health and the Ophthalmic Oncology Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. METHODS Physician survey, retrospective database review, and literature search. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES History of RB and development of sAML, management of RB (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy), age at diagnosis of RB and leukemia, French-American-British (FAB) subtype, and current status of patient (alive or dead). RESULTS Fifteen patients with sAML were identified; 13 occurred in childhood. Mean latent period from RB to AML diagnosis was 9.8 years (median, 42 months). Nine cases were of the M2 or M5 FAB subtypes. Twelve patients (79 %) had received chemotherapy with a topoisomerase II inhibitor, 8 (43%) had received chemotherapy with an epipodophyllotoxin. Ten children died of their leukemia. CONCLUSIONS Acute myelogenous leukemia is a rare secondary malignancy among retinoblastoma patients, many of whom were treated with primary or adjuvant chemotherapy. Additional studies are needed to assess potential risk factors contributing to sAML development in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan S Gombos
- Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|