Ozurdex completely located inside a crystallized lens - Results of 14 months

Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Evaluation of a Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in the Crystalline Lens: A Case Report

Purpose

Ozurdex® is a dexamethasone intravitreal implant approved for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch or central retinal vein occlusion, non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye, and diabetic macular edema.

Patients and Methods

We report a case of an accidental injection of the implant into the crystalline lens, successfully managed by surgery afterwards. The case description is supported by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) images.

Results

A 69-year-old male was observed for bilateral diabetic macular edema. He had previously been treated with bevacizumab and aflibercept, with an incomplete anatomical response (<20% reduction in central macular thickness). The patient consented to undergo a bilateral intravitreal dexamethasone injection (dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7 mg)). The procedures were uneventful, except for an extensive conjunctival hemorrhage in the right eye. An appointment was scheduled for fifteen days later, however the patient missed it. Four months later, he referred OD vision loss, which occurred a few days after the injection, and the implant was found within the right crystalline lens. An AS-OCT was done to better understand the implant's location and entry point. Due to decreased visual acuity, the patient was scheduled for surgery. A phacoemulsification surgery with a three-piece hydrophobic intraocular lens implantation in the sulcus associated with anterior vitrectomy was done.

Conclusion

The injection of a dexamethasone implant is becoming increasingly common. Nonetheless, it must always be carried out carefully, to avoid complications. If the implant is accidentally injected into the crystalline lens, the AS-OCT can help determine its exact location, which is important for preparing the surgical plan and determining the appropriate timing.

Anterior Segment Complications Following Intravitreal Injection

Intravitreal injections (IVI s) have gained increased popularity in the past decades and are used to treat a multitude of ailments. In 2010, the total number of IVI s surpassed the number of cataract surgeries performed, making it the most common procedure in ophthalmology. As the number of injections increases, so does the number of injected-related complications. While complications in the posterior segment, such as retinal detachment or endophthalmitis, are detrimental to visual function and have therefore been well documented, IVI s can also lead to complications in the anterior segment. These include hyphema, inflammation of the sterile anterior segment (incidence rate of 0.05 to 1.1% depending on the drug), implant migration with corneal decompensation (incidence rate of 0.43%), iatrogenic lens damage (incidence rate of 0.07%), accelerated cataract formation (up to 50% for steroids and 10.9% for anti-VEGF), and an increased complication rate during subsequent cataract surgery (up to 4% per IVI). Most of these complications occur immediately and have a good prognosis if treated correctly. However, the increased risk of complications during subsequent surgery demonstrates that IVI s can also have long-term complications, a topic that needs to be explored further in future research projects.

Effect of intralenticular dexamethasone implant: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant is indicated for the treatment of macular oedema due to diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion and uveitis. The most common complications are cataract and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Accidental injection of DEX implant into the lens is a rare complication and only few papers presented it.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 40-year-old man was treated with DEX implant for diabetic macular oedema in both eyes. At 1 week follow-up visit, slit lamp examination showed the DEX implant was located in the crystalline lens of the right eye (RE) without any sign of inflammation, cataract or elevated IOP, so we decided to plan a normal follow-up schedule. Macular oedema relapsed 5 months after the injection in the left eye (LE), whereas the RE did not show any sing of intraretinal or subretinal fluid. Six months after DEX implantation an uneventful phacoemulsification and intraocular lens placement were performed in the RE because of IOP elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic effect of DEX implant can be maintained for a longer period of time than intravitreal implant, determining complete reabsorption of macular oedema. Intralenticular implant can be maintained inside the lens until either IOP increases, cataract progresses, or other complications occur.

Management of Accidental Intravitreal Dexamethasone Injection Into the Lens: A Case Report

An accidental injection of a dexamethasone implant inside the crystalline lens was observed in the right eye of a 63-year-old woman suffering from a macular edema secondary to a central retinal vein occlusion. A 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy and lensectomy followed by an intraocular lens implantation were performed to carefully remove the lens and save the whole implant in order to preserve its therapeutics effects. A strict follow-up over the following 3 months revealed an improving of macular edema and no postoperative complications. The injection of a dexamethasone implant into the lens could be effectively and successfully managed with a pars plana vitrectomy and lensectomy.

Intralenticular Ozurdex injection in an eye with thicker lens and the therapeutic effect maintained for 15 months

Introduction

To report a case of accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injection in an eye with thicker lens. During the follow-up period of 15 months, the therapeutic effect of intralenticular Ozurdex was maintained.

Case description

Ozurdex was accidently injected into the lens of an eye with uveitis, and the lens thickness was measured to be 5.70 mm. The uveitis was under good control, and no significant development of cataract was observed until 7 months after the intralenticular Ozurdex injection. Then due to the outbreak of COVID-19, follow-up was suspended. Fifteen months after the injection, the patient returned to the doctor. At this time, significant cataract development was observed, whereas uveitis was still under good control. Accordingly, cataract surgery and Ozurdex extraction were performed. Two months after surgery, a mild recurrence of uveitis occurred.

Conclusions

A thicker lens might be an important risk factor for accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injections. However, after intralenticular Ozurdex injection, the development of cataract was slow, and Ozurdex could still have a therapeutic effect on uveitis in this case. Thus, immediate surgery might be unnecessary for certain accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injection cases, and a follow-up strategy could be chosen to maintain the effect of Ozurdex.

Misdirected ozurdex implant

Ozurdex is one of the most commonly inserted intravitreal steroid implants in cases of posterior uveitis and recalcitrant macular edema in cases of diabetic retinopathy and vascular occlusions. Here we report accidental malpositioning of this implant in patellar fossa.

Unintentional injection of a dexamethasone implant into the crystalline lens: a case report

The intravitreal dexamethasone implant is a sustained-release anti-inflammatory drug system that releases 0.7 mg of dexamethasone into the vitreous cavity. The following case report describes a rare complication: accidental injection of the dexamethasone implant into the crystalline lens. A 73-year-old woman was diagnosed with central retina vein occlusion and cystoid macular edema. Initial tSreatment included three monthly intravitreal doses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment, which was not successful. Treatment was then modified to an intravitreal dexamethasone implant. Ten weeks later, the implant was observed in the posterior cortex of the crystalline lens. Because no improvement had occurred, the patient underwent phacoemulsification surgery, during which part of the lens migrated into the vitreous cavity. Therefore, 23-gauge pars plana complete vitrectomy was performed with trans-surgical administration of intravitreal aflibercept. Crystalline lens injury due to an intravitreal dexamethasone implant is a rare complication and typically results from the injection procedure. Immediate surgical or conservative approaches should be considered on an individual basis.

Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury during intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide: A report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal injection has become an efficient approach for delivering drugs at therapeutic levels to the posterior segment in retinal diseases. However, the increased frequency and number of intravitreal injections have raised concerns about their side effects. As manipulation during surgery is relatively simple, details of the procedure are easily overlooked. Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury is a rare complication caused by improper manipulation during surgical procedures. We report two cases of crystalline lens injury during intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) with the hope of providing an insight into this treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

Case 1 was a 62-year-old woman with macular edema caused by central retinal vein occlusion in her right eye, and Case 2 was a 65-year-old man with macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion in his right eye. In view of the patients’ condition and economic constraints, an intravitreal injection of TA was administered. Due to inappropriate manipulation during surgery, the lens was injured. The site of lens injury and clinical manifestations were different in the two cases. Symptomatic treatment and continuous follow-up were carried out. The therapeutic effect following phacoemulsification of the cataract was satisfactory.

CONCLUSION

Well-defined surgical incision under proper anesthesia, sufficient patient information and proficient anatomical skills of the physician are mandatory to prevent this rare adverse event. Careful and meticulous phacoemulsification of the cataract is suggested.

Iatrogenic intralenticular broken steroid implant: a case report

Background

This is a case report of an iatrogenic intralenticular broken steroid (Ozurdex™) implant in a patient with uveitis. There are only a few case reports on broken Ozurdex™ implants in the vitreous cavity, with none of them involving the crystalline lens. A few authors have described the accidental injection of an Ozurdex™ implant into the crystalline lens, but all of the implants remained in one piece in the lens and none of them were broken. We report an unusual case of an Ozurdex™ implant which was injected inadvertently into the crystalline lens, resulting in a broken Ozurdex™ implant with an entry and exit wound through the posterior capsule of the lens.

Case presentation

An ophthalmic trainee performed an Ozurdex™ intravitreal injection into a 48-year-old Asian man’s right eye under aseptic conditions. This patient was then followed up for further management. On day 7 post-procedure, a slit lamp examination revealed that the Ozurdex™ implant was injected into the intralenticular structure of his right eye and had fractured into two pieces. The posterior capsule of the right lens was breached, with one half of the Ozurdex™ implant stuck at the entry and the other stuck at the exit wound of the posterior capsule. This patient underwent right eye cataract extraction and repositioning of the fractured implant; he made an uneventful recovery.

Conclusions

Ophthalmologists should be aware of the potential risk of injecting an Ozurdex™ implant into an anatomical structure other than the vitreous cavity. Adequate training and careful administration of the Ozurdex™ implant are necessary to avoid such a complication, which fortunately is rare.

Accidental Intralenticular Injection of Ozurdex® for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Intact Posterior Capsule and Resolution of Macular Edema

Purpose

We present a case of accidental intralenticular injection of Ozurdex implant in a patient with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

Method

A case report.

Results

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection had been performed for macular edema due to left superior temporal vein branch occlusion to the left eye of a 78-year-old male patient. The slit-lamp examination 85 days later revealed that the dexamethasone implant was intralenticular. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.16 on the Snellen chart. Cataract surgery was decided on for the cataract as there was no anterior chamber inflammation, the intraocular pressure (IOP) was normal, and the macular edema had resolved. Uneventful phacoemulsification within the bag intraocular lens placement was performed.

Conclusions

Accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injection is an extremely rare complication. The surgeon must decide whether to continue to observe or intervene immediately when such a complication is encountered. Cataract surgery can be planned if the macular edema has resolved and a cataract has developed. It is important to evaluate the posterior capsule with ultrasound biomicroscopy and Scheimpflug imaging before the cataract surgery to ensure a safe surgical procedure.

Pars plana vitrectomy and re-directing a dexamethasone implant into vitreous cavity following misdirected entry into the crystalline lens

A known diabetic patient presented with diabetic macular edema (DME) and nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy in both eyes with a vision of 6/18, N₁₂ in the right eye and 4/60, N₃₆ in the left eye (LE). The patient had undergone injection of dexamethasone implant in the LE which got misdirected into the crystalline lens. The patient was taken up for phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation along with vitrectomy and posterior vitreous detachment induction, and redirection of the dexamethasone implant into the vitreous cavity. The DME resolved over the next 3 months.