Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars

Comparative Assessment of Relapse Following Fixed Orthodontic Treatment in Patients Treated With and Without Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The present systematic review aimed to evaluate and compare the post-treatment relapse of overjet, overbite, and mandibular incisor crowding in patients treated with extraction and non-extraction orthodontic approaches and to assess the influence of treatment modality on long-term stability. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Data were extracted from 10 studies, including retrospective and longitudinal designs, with a total of 720 participants. The primary outcome measures included overjet, overbite, and Little's Irregularity Index. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as the summary statistic to compare extraction and non-extraction groups. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in relapse between extraction and non-extraction groups for overjet (SMD: 0.52, 95% CI: -0.18 to 1.23, p>0.05), overbite (SMD: 0.41, 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.93, p>0.05), and incisor irregularity index (SMD: 0.71, 95% CI: -0 to 1.23, p>0.05). Funnel plots indicated no significant publication bias. Risk of bias assessment showed moderate concerns in confounding and participant selection across several studies, while bias due to missing data was notable in longer follow-up studies. The findings suggest that both extraction and non-extraction treatment approaches exhibit similar post-treatment relapse rates for overjet, overbite, and incisor irregularity. The choice of treatment should be based on clinical considerations along with concerns of long-term stability. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to strengthen the evidence.

Comparison of aging of nonextraction treated and normal untreated occlusions: 40-year follow up

The objective of this study was to compare the aging changes of the dental arches in patients treated without extractions and untreated normal occlusion subjects after a four-decade follow-up. This retrospective study evaluated two groups: The Treated Group (Group T) comprised 16 patients (6 male; 10 female) presenting with Class I or Class II malocclusions treated orthodontically without extractions. Dental models were evaluated 3 stages: T1 (pretreatment, 13.20 years), T2 (posttreatment, 15.07 years) and T3 (long-term posttreatment, 50.32 years). The Untreated Group (Group UT) consisted of 22 untreated normal occlusion individuals. The dental casts were evaluated at the ages of 13.32 (T1), 17.82 (T2) and 60.95 years (T3). The dental casts were digitized and the irregularity index, intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar widths, overjet and overbite, arch length and perimeter were measured. Intergroup comparisons were performed with independent t tests (P < 0.05). From T1 to T2, the treated group showed maxillary and mandibular crowding and overjet decrease and a maxillary interpremolar and intermolar width increase compared to the untreated group. From T2 to T3, a greater maxillary and mandibular crowding increase and a greater arch length decrease were observed in the treated group compared to the normal occlusion subjects. Overbite increased in the treated group and decreased in the untreated group. The maturational changes of treated patients were different from untreated normal occlusion subjects. Relapse might have contributed for the greater changes observed in incisor crowding and arch length observed in orthodontically treated patients. The aging changes of untreated normal occlusions and nonextraction treated patients, after a four-decade follow-up, proved to be different, indicating that relapse of orthodontic treatment played a role in aging changes of treated patients.

Premolar Extraction Affects Mandibular Kinematics

OBJECTIVES

 The practice of premolar extraction in orthodontics is controversial for its potential detrimental effects on the stomatognathic system. However, the ways in which premolar extraction affects mandibular function are still poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of premolar extraction on mandibular kinematics by evaluating axiographic tracings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Forty-five orthodontically treated patients with premolar teeth extraction were compared with 45 paired untreated controls, selected for the absence of malocclusions. Systematic three-dimensional axiographic recordings of the mandibular movements were performed for protrusive-retrusive movements and speech. The transversal deviations and length of the movements were recorded for both sides along with the rotation angle during speech.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

 Differences between the axiographic variables were analyzed via the permutation test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Linear regression was performed to test whether axiographic parameters were predictive of group affiliation. Dot plots were used to explore the distribution of each of the axiographic outcomes, and isometric principal component analysis to assess the differences between the cumulative effects of premolar extraction on jaw motion.

RESULTS

 The mandibular lateral translation in protrusion-retrusion and speech, the amount of rotation as well as the length of mandibular movements during speech were significantly higher in the treated subjects than in the controls, while retral stability did not differ. The linear regression yielded significant results for the mandibular lateral translation in protrusion-retrusion. The isometric principal component analysis showed higher values of the axiographic variables for 11 out of 45 individuals in the study sample compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

 Premolar extraction altered mandibular kinematics in at least 25% of the cases within our sample, and the transversal discrepancy between protrusive and retrusive tracings was even predictive of group affiliation. These results support the notion that the routine practice of premolar extraction as part of the orthodontic treatment should be discouraged. It is compelling to perform further studies to assess whether a disrupted kinematics of the mandible is associated to temporomandibular disorders.

Long-term stability of mandibular incisor alignment in patients treated nonextraction with or without interproximal enamel reduction

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare long-term mandibular incisor stability in nongrowing patients with moderate crowding treated nonextraction with and without interproximal enamel reduction (IPR).

METHODS

Forty-two nongrowing patients with Class I dental and skeletal malocclusion with moderate crowding were divided into 2 groups with an equal number of patients depending on whether IPR was used (IPR group) or not (non-IPR group) during treatment. All patients were treated by the same practitioner and used thermoplastic retainers full-time for 12 ± 1 months at the end of the active treatment. Changes in Peer Assessment Rating scores, Little's irregularity index (LII), intercanine width (ICW), and mandibular incisor inclination (IMPA and L1-NB°) were evaluated using pretreatment, posttreatment, and 8 ± 1 years postretention dental models and lateral cephalograms.

RESULTS

At the end of the treatment, Peer Assessment Rating scores and LII decreased, and ICW, IMPA, and L1-NB° increased significantly (P <0.001) in both groups. At the end of the postretention period, in both groups, LII increased, and ICW decreased significantly (P <0.001) compared with posttreatment values, whereas IMPA and L1-NB remained stable. When treatment changes were compared, increases in ICW, IMPA, and L1-NB were significantly (P <0.001) higher in the non-IPR group. When postretention changes were compared, the only significant difference between 2 groups was observed in ICW. The decrease in ICW was significantly higher in the non-IPR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term stability of mandibular incisor alignment in Class I nongrowing patients with moderate crowding treated nonextraction with and without IPR was similar.

Association between arch width changes and long-term stability 20 years after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate long-term stability 20 years after orthodontic treatment and the association with arch width changes during treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study investigated 103 patients with Class I and II malocclusions treated with fixed appliances with and without extractions. The sample was treated by one experienced orthodontist and collected from a private orthodontic office. Dental casts were obtained pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and long-term postretention (T3); they were scanned and converted to STL files. Measurements were evaluated in for the upper and lower arch: intercanine width (IC), intermolar (IM) width, Little's irregularity index (LII).

RESULTS

There were 73 female and 30 male patients. Class I was present in 74 patients and Class II in 29. Average postretention time was 17.2 (±6.5) years after an average active retention time of 3.4 (±1.17) years. Extraction was performed in 55 patients while 48 received nonextraction treatment. Bonferroni Post Hoc test showed that LII in the upper and lower arches at T1 was significantly higher in the extraction group (P < .001). Upper and lower arch LII at T3 was slightly higher in extraction cases but remained under 2.05 mm. LII at T3 in the upper and lower arches showed negative correlation with IM T3 in the upper arch (Pearson, N = 103, P = .047), while IC in the upper and lower arches at T3 correlated with IM T3 in the upper and lower (N = 103, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically relevant long-term stability in both arches was found in extraction and nonextraction cases. Intermolar width and its change during orthodontic treatment was an influential factor on long-term stability in extraction cases.

Cephalometric and model evaluations after molar distalization using modified C-palatal plates in patients with severe arch length discrepancy

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes after molar distalization using modified C-palatal plates in patients with severe maxillomandibular arch length discrepancies.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with Class I and II malocclusion (19.0 ± 7.3 years; 17 females and 8 males), who had severe maxillary crowding of >10 mm, and moderate mandibular crowding of >6 mm, underwent molar distalization using modified C-palatal plates and buccal miniscrews with approximately 300 g of force per side. Models were made, and cephalograms were taken before and after treatment. Cephalometric variables and arch dimensions were measured. Paired t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In the maxillary dentition, an average of 12.4 mm of crowding was resolved by molar distalization of 4.4 mm, interproximal stripping of 0.7 mm, and arch expansion. In the mandibular dentition, crowding of 6.7 mm was alleviated by molar distalization of 2.4 mm, an interproximal of 1.5 mm, and additional arch expansion. The incisor positions were maintained (SN-U1, 101.3°; IMPA, 88.8°), and soft-tissue profiles were improved (LL/E-line -1.1 mm; P < 0.001) after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Maxillary and mandibular tooth-size arch length discrepancy of 12.4 mm and 6.7 mm, respectively, were resolved by molar distalization, interproximal reduction, and arch expansion, whereas incisor positions were maintained, and soft-tissue profiles were improved. This could be a viable treatment option in patients with moderate-to-severe crowding.

Does quality of orthodontic treatment outcome influence post-treatment stability? A retrospective study investigating short-term stability 2 years after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and in the presence of fixed retainers

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate stability 2 years after orthodontic treatment and to investigate the influence of various pre-treatment and post-treatment prognostic factors on stability.

SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION

Consecutive patients treated with full fixed appliance and retained with fixed retainers were retrospectively assessed for eligibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Digital models were analysed at treatment start (T0), end of treatment (T1) and 2 years post-treatment (T2). The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index, Little's Irregularity Index (LII), arch width and length, overjet, overbite and presence of unexpected post-treatment changes were assessed. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to model the relationship of all outcomes with several prognostics simultaneously.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 287 subjects (mean treatment time: 25.1 months, standard deviation [SD] 7.5; mean post-treatment follow-up: 27.5 months, SD 6.1) with a mean weighted PAR score of 29.5 (SD 8.6) at T0, 1.8 (SD 2.9) at T1 and 3.2 (SD 3.6) at T2. At T1, 95% of the subjects had a perfect LII versus 86% at T2. An increased LII at T1 correlated with increased LII and PAR changes from T1 to T2. PAR at T1 as well as overjet at T0 was a significant prognostic factor for PAR at T2. At T2, five cases (1.7%) showed unexpected post-treatment changes related to fixed retainers.

CONCLUSION

Short-term post-treatment stability with fixed retainers was very good. Prognostic factors for stability included LII and PAR at T1, suggesting that high-quality treatment outcome in the presence of fixed retainers may ensure post-treatment stability.

Occlusal changes in orthodontically treated subjects 40 years after treatment and comparison with untreated control subjects

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to compare the aging changes of the dental arches in orthodontically treated and untreated subjects after a 4-decade follow-up period.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 2 groups. The treated group comprised 29 patients (11 male, 18 female) presenting with Class I or Class II malocclusions orthodontically treated with extractions of 4 first premolars. Dental models taken at pretreatment (12.84 years), posttreatment (14.95 years), and long-term posttreatment (51.37 years) were evaluated. The untreated (control) group consisted of 22 untreated patients with dental models taken at 13.32, 17.82, and 60.95 years of age. The dental models were digitized, and the following variables were evaluated: Little irregularity index, intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar widths, arch length, arch perimeter, overjet, and overbite. Interphase comparison of the treated group was performed with repeated measures analysis of variance and Tukey tests. Intergroup comparisons were performed using t tests (P <0.05).

RESULTS

Crowding was corrected with treatment but relapsed significantly in the long term. Intercanine width increased with treatment and decreased in the long term. Interpremolar and intermolar widths, arch perimeter, and length decreased with treatment and continued to decrease long-term posttreatment. Overjet and overbite were corrected with treatment and remained stable in the long term. From posttreatment to long-term posttreatment, a greater crowding increase was observed in the treated group than in the untreated group. The treated group demonstrated a greater decrease in mandibular intercanine and maxillary and mandibular interpremolar widths than the untreated sample. Overbite increased in the treated group and decreased in the untreated group. The multiple regression analysis showed that previous 4-premolar extractions orthodontic treatment is significantly associated with anterior crowding in the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long-term, the treated patients showed relapse of crowding and a decrease in arch form. Long-term changes of treated patients were different from untreated subjects. Relapse might have contributed to greater changes in incisor crowding and arch widths observed in the treated patients.

Extraction or Nonextraction in Orthodontic Cases: A Review

Orthodontic treatment helps bring teeth in alignment. There is always debate whether tooth should be extracted or not for treating crowding. The present article highlights various advantages and disadvantages of extraction.

Incisor and profile alterations in extraction cases treated with standard Edgewise and pre-adjusted appliances: A controlled before-and-after study

BACKGROUND

Even though treatment of Class II malocclusion with premolar extractions and incisor retraction might affect incisor inclination and soft tissue profile, the effects of bracket prescription on this have not been thoroughly assessed.

METHODS

Fifty patients (mean age: 13.6 years; 34% male) receiving extraction-based treatment with either standard Edgewise or pre-adjusted appliances were included. Between-group differences in the incisor inclination assessed with lateral cephalograms were analyzed statistically with linear/logistic regression at 5%.

RESULTS

Treatment-induced changes included retroclination of the upper/lower incisors (-3.0° and -2.0°, respectively), retraction of the upper/lower incisors (-3.4 mm and -1.5 mm, respectively), retraction of the upper/lower lip (-2.1 mm and -2.0 mm, respectively), and enlargement of the nasolabial angle (+1.6°). Analysis of the data adjusting for confounders indicated that the pre-adjusted group, after treatment, had larger inclination of the upper or lower incisors (+3.2° and +4.5°, respectively), more prominent upper incisors relative to the facial plane (+1.3 mm), and smaller interincisal angle (-7.3 or -7.7°). Post-treatment upper incisor inclination fell within the cephalometric norm significantly more in the pre-adjusted than in the standard Edgewise group (odds ratio 4.3; 95% confidence interval 1.1-16.6). No differences were found in lower incisor prominence, upper/lower lip prominence, or nasolabial angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-adjusted appliances were associated with increased inclination of the upper and lower incisors, with more prominent upper incisors, and with more acute interincisal angle after retraction compared with standard Edgewise appliances. However, such differences did not translate in greater retraction of the upper/lower lips and greater nasolabial angle.

Separation of aligning and leveling stages to control mandibular incisor inclination: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether separating the alignment and leveling phases can reduce proclination of the mandibular incisors.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included Class I subjects with an irregularity index of 3-5 mm, 3-4 mm curve-of-Spee (COS), and non-extraction treatment. Thirty adults were randomly allocated into two groups: (1) Control group was leveled and aligned simultaneously with flat archwires progressively to 0.016x0.022-in stainless-steel; (2) Experimental group was aligned first with 0.014-in-superelastic NiTi with mild accentuated COS, then leveled using 0.016x0.022-in beta-titanium accentuated COS archwires and gradually reduced the curve until flat. Mandibular incisor position and inclination were evaluated by cephalometric analysis. COS and irregularity index were evaluated in study models. Assessment was conducted twice after 0.016-in NiTi and after 0.016x0.022-in stainless-steel archwire placements. Dental changes from cephalograms and models were compared within group using paired t-test and between groups using independent t-test.

RESULTS

Control group: Round-wire-phase, mandibular incisors tipped labially (4.38° and 1 mm) with intrusion (-1.13 mm); Rectangular-wire-phase, mandibular incisors further intruded and proclined (-0.63 mm and 1.38°). Experimental group: During aligning with round accentuated COS archwires, mandibular incisors tipped very slightly labially (0.75° and 0.50 mm) with no significant intrusion; during leveling with rectangular archwires, incisors majorly intruded (1.75 mm) with slight proclination (1.81°). The experimental group had significant less incisor proclination (control: 5.76°, experimental: 2.56°) with more incisor intrusion (control: -1.75 mm, experimental: -2.13 mm). The COS in experimental group showed significant greater reduction (-2.88 mm) than that of the control group (-1.69 mm).

CONCLUSION

In control group, mandibular incisor proclination was markedly observed in round archwires, with further proclination caused by rectangular archwires. In experimental group, minimal proclination was exhibited when accentuated COS round archwires were used for aligning. Leveling with rectangular archwires caused less proclination with more COS reduction.

Long-term occlusal changes and patient satisfaction in patients treated with and without extractions: 37 years after treatment

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this research was to evaluate the treatment outcomes, long-term occlusal changes, and patient satisfaction after 37 years of nonextraction and extraction treatments.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with Class I and Class II malocclusion were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included 16 patients treated with nonextraction therapy, with mean initial (T1), final (T2), and long-term posttreatment (T3) ages of 13.2, 15.0, and 50.3 years, respectively. Mean treatment time (T2 - T1) and long-term follow-up time (T3 - T2) were 1.8 and 35.2 years, respectively. Group 2 included 41 patients treated with extraction of 4 first premolars, with mean ages at T1, T2, and T3 of 13.3, 15.6, and 53.6 years, respectively. Mean treatment (T2 - T1) and long-term follow-up (T3 - T2) times were 2.3 and 37.9 years, respectively. The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index and Objective Grading System (OGS) indexes were evaluated at T1, T2, and T3 stages. The subjects also answered an online questionnaire regarding esthetic and occlusal self-perception at T3. Intergroup comparison was performed with t tests.

RESULTS

The PAR index improved with treatment and similarly worsened at T3 for both groups. OGS scores were close to the passing score at T2 for both groups. The nonextraction group presented worse OGS scores at T3 than the extraction group. Nonextraction patients perceived more changes in alignment over time, but overall satisfaction was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The PAR index improved with treatment, and the PAR and OGS scores showed a significant increase, indicating great occlusal changes in the long-term stage. The nonextraction group showed more occlusal changes and perceived more changes in their alignment over time, but overall patient satisfaction was similar in both groups.

Anterior tooth alignment and arch dimensions changes: 37-year follow-up in patients treated with and without premolar extraction

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this research was to evaluate the anterior tooth alignment and dental arch dimension changes after orthodontic treatments with and without premolar extractions in the long-term.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with Class I and Class II malocclusion were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 included 16 patients treated with nonextraction therapy, with mean initial (T1), final (T2), and long-term follow-up (T3) ages of 13.20 years, 15.07 years, and 50.32 years, respectively. The mean treatment (T2 - T1) and long-term follow-up (T3 - T2) times were 1.86 years and 35.25 years, respectively. Group 2 included 41 patients treated with extraction of 4 first premolars, with T1, T2, and T3 ages of 13.31 years, 15.63 years, and 53.60 years, respectively. The mean treatment and long-term follow-up times were 2.32 years and 37.96 years, respectively. The mean retention time was 2.26 years for both groups. The dental casts were obtained and digitized at T1, T2, and T3 stages. The following measurements were obtained: Little irregularity index, arch length, perimeter, and intercanine, interpremolar, and intermolar widths. Intragroup and intergroup comparisons were performed with repeated measures analysis of variance and t tests, respectively.

RESULTS

Anterior tooth irregularity index increased at T3 in both groups. In addition, all arch dimensions, except the intercanine width, were significantly smaller in the extraction group at T3. Both groups showed similar arch dimension changes at T3, except for the mandibular arch perimeter. The percentage of mandibular anterior tooth alignment change was significantly greater in the nonextraction than in the extraction group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the changes of anterior alignment and transverse arch dimensions in patients treated with and without premolar extraction at T3, but the percentage of mandibular anterior tooth alignment changes was higher in the nonextraction than in the extraction patients at T3. The mandibular arch perimeter showed more of a decrease at T3 in extraction patients.

Nonextraction Management of Severely Malaligned and Constricted Upper Arch

This case report presents the treatment of a 12-year-old female with a severely crowded upper arch, severely palatally displaced upper premolars and lateral incisors, large midline diastema, lower midline deviation to the right, class III dental and skeletal relationships due to mild maxillary deficiency, retroclined lower incisors, straight profile, and retrusive lips. A nonextraction treatment approach is described, in which the upper and lower arches were expanded to their original three dimensions using a trihelix expander, a lip bumper appliance, and a fixed orthodontic appliance. Retention was also planned in accordance with the original malocclusion, which inclued a full-time-wear upper wraparound retainer, upper and lower anterior fixed lingual retainers, upper frenectomy, and fibrotomy for rotated teeth. Conclusion. Severe malalignment of teeth does not necessarily require extraction treatment. Gaining space is an art that requires a proper assessment of the anteroposterior and transverse dimensions of alveolar arches, lip prominence, and postorthodontic stability.

A Full Diagnostic Process for the Orthodontic Treatment Strategy: A Documented Case Report

The need for extractions in orthodontic treatment has always been a controversial topic. However, to date there is not a specific clinical guideline that can help the clinicians deciding to plan an extractive or a non-extractive orthodontic treatment. In this respect, clinicians must deal with patients’ occlusal, functional, periodontal and aesthetics characteristics before planning an orthodontic treatment including extraction. Considering the absence of specific guidelines, the choice to extract teeth or not is complicated, particularly in borderline cases. In this case report, we present a borderline case of a patient with the skeletal Class III pattern and significant crowding in both arches that could be treated with or without extraction, illustrating the diagnostic and decision-making processes that were conducted for the orthodontic treatment strategy.

Evaluation of the influence of mandibular third molars on mandibular anterior crowding relapse

Objective: To evaluate the influence of mandibular third molars on relapse of mandibular anterior crowding in orthodontically treated patients.Material and Methods: Sample included orthodontic records of 108 patients: Group 1: 72 patients (39 female; 33 male) with third molars present in the postretention evaluation stage. Group 2: 36 patients (18 female; 18 male) who did not present the third molars in the postretention evaluation stage. Panoramic radiographs and dental models were evaluated at three different stages: pre-treatment; posttreatment and postretention. Panoramic radiographs showed the presence or absence of third molars in the 3 evaluated stages and on the dental models, overbite and mandibular anterior crowding was measured by the Little Irregularity Index. For intergroup comparisons, t-tests and a multifactorial regression analysis were used.Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the relapse of mandibular anterior crowding among the groups with and without mandibular third molars at the postretention stage.Conclusion: The presence or absence of mandibular third molars did not influence the relapse of mandibular anterior crowding in orthodontically treated patients.

Mandibular alignment changes after full-fixed orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although post-treatment mandibular alignment has been extensively investigated, the findings remain controversial.

Objectives

The objective was to assess mandibular alignment changes, as measured by the irregularity index, of patients who underwent full-fixed orthodontic treatment and were followed up at least 1 year after retention.

Search methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library, in addition, the reference lists of included studies, were screened. The search was conducted up to April 2018.

Selection criteria

The study designs included both interventional and observational studies of orthodontic patients who received either extraction or non-extraction treatment.

Data collection and analysis

The interventional studies were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias assessment tool. The quality of the observational studies was evaluated using National Institution of Health quality assessment tools. The first two authors independently applied the eligibility criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Any conflicts were resolved with consensus discussion with the third author.

Results

The search retrieved 11 326 articles, 170 of which were assessed for eligibility. There were 44 studies included in the qualitative assessments and 30 in the meta-analyses. The studies included 1 randomized control trial (RCT) and 43 observational studies. The RCT was judged to have a high risk of bias and all of the observational studies had either fair or poor quality. The meta-analysis was based on studies judged to be of fair quality, including a total of 1859 patients. All meta-analyses were performed using random-effect models. The standardized mean difference between post-treatment and post-retention irregularity was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.04–1.40) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.63–1.07) after extraction and non-extraction treatments, respectively. There was a substantial heterogeneity for the extraction (I2 = 75.2%) and non-extraction (I2 = 70.1%) studies. The follow-up duration (1–10 versus 10–20 years) explained 33% of the heterogeneity, with longer follow-up studies showing more irregularity.

Limitations

The quality of evidence provided by the studies was low. There was a risk of publication bias, and the search was limited to English language.

Conclusions and implications

Post-treatment mandibular irregularity increases are limited. Irregularity increases are slightly greater in patients treated with mandibular premolars extractions, and in patients followed up over longer periods of time.

Registration

The study protocol was not registered.

Implementing post-orthodontic compliance among adolescents wearing removable retainers through Whatsapp: a pilot study

Purpose: To determine whether the use of social media is useful in improving compliance and follow-up attendance among patients wearing retainers after orthodontic treatment. Patients and methods: Sixty post-orthodontic patients (aged 16-19 years), randomized in two groups: follow-up supported by participation in WhatsApp chat group (SG), and Control Group (CG). All patients were scheduled for quarterly check-ups for monitoring of orthodontic stability by measurement of intercanine width at the beginning of the study (t₀) and every 4 months t₁, t₂, t₃) for 1 year of observation. Patients in the SG additionally participated in a WhatsApp chat group, where they would send, on a weekly basis, snapshots showing his/her occlusion. Every month, the orthodontist acting as the moderator awarded the best five snapshots by publishing a ranking in the chat. Results: Participants in the SG featured smaller changes from the intercanine widths at baseline (at debonding) compared to the CG patients at all times during 1 year of follow-up. Follow-up attendance was regular in both groups in the first 8 months of follow-up. After that, patient compliance decreased in the CG, with eight patients missing check-up appointments. Conclusion: Engaging adolescent patients directly through WhatsApp activity seems to increase regularity in wearing removable retainers, attendance to follow-up schedule, and yield better long-term outcome in terms of orthodontic stability and compliance.

Factors affecting treatment decisions for Class I malocclusions

INTRODUCTION

Orthodontic treatment planning requires skill and expertise with considerable practice variations. The aims of this study were to review retrospectively the pretreatment records of patients with Class I malocclusion and to identify variables that could play a role in the treatment decision.

METHODS

From the available records of 1500 orthdontic patients, the pretreatment records of 202 patients were selected at random. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, and the surviving records were divided into extraction (n = 92) and nonextraction (n = 92) treatment groups. Skeletal, dental, and soft tissue measurements were obtained from pretreatment lateral cephalograms and dental casts of subjects with bilateral Class I molar relationships. Data were statistically analyzed by binary logistic regression tests.

RESULTS

The results showed that the variables of lower anterior facial height, E-plane to upper lip, and maxillary and mandibular incisor inclinations were significantly increased in the extraction group (P <0.05), whereas spacing in the mandibular arch and increased overbite were statistically significant in the nonextraction treatment group (P <0.05). According to the model, the odds of nonextraction treatment are 1.29 and 1.24 times that of extraction treatment for every 1-mm increase in overbite and spacing in the mandibular arch, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertical facial pattern, overbite, mandibular tooth size-arch length discrepancy, lip position, and maxillary and mandibular incisor inclinations are a few of the important variables that should not be overlooked when planning orthodontic treatment. The findings of this study could facilitate the treatment planning process for patients with Class I malocclusion.

Effects of Three Different Orthodontic Treatment Methods on the Stability of Mandibular Incisor Alignment

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of extraction, non-extraction and air-rotor stripping treatments on mandibular dental arch dimensions, lower incisor positions and evaluate their effects on the stability of the treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

The sample consisted of 44 patients with Class I malocclusion and moderate crowding including 15 patients treated with extraction, 13 with air-rotor stripping (ARS), and 16 with non-extraction treatment. The records were taken at pretreatment (T0), end of active orthodontic treatment (T1), minimum 3 years post-treatment (T2). The model and cephalometric measurements were evaluated. For statistical analyses ANOVA and Welch test was applied.

RESULTS

At post-retention period Little's irregularity indices were increased to 1.96 mm, 2.38 mm and 3.59 mm for extraction, ARS and non-extraction groups respectively (p<0.05). At T1-T2, intercanine widths were decreased significantly at all groups (p<0.05). The arch length and arch depth decreased significantly at extraction group (p<0.05) from T0 to T1 and remained the same at T2 (p>0.05). The lower incisors were retroclined with treatment and slightly proclined at post-retention period in extraction group. In ARS and non-extraction group, lower incisors proclined with treatment and remained the same at post-retention.

CONCLUSION

At all groups the irregularity indices relapsed but did not return to pretreatment values. Although significant increase at intercanine width was only observed in non-extraction treatment, at post-retention phase, intercanine widths were significantly decreased at all groups. The changes at lower incisor inclinations relapsed slightly in extraction group but remained the same in the other groups.

[Not Available]

Le Pr Ravindra Nanda a obtenu une licence et une maîtrise en dentisterie et en orthodontie du King George's Medical College, Lucknow University. En 1967, il a intégré l'Université Catholique de Nimègue, aux Pays-Bas, où il a obtenu un doctorat en philosophie en 1969. Il a rejoint la nouvelle école dentaire de Loyola à Chicago en 1970, après avoir occupé le poste de Professeur assistant en orthodontie dans le service dirigé par Frans van der Linden. En 1972, il fut promu au Département d'Orthodontie de l'Université du Connecticut à Farmington, CT, et y reçu son certificat en orthodontie sous la direction de Charles Burstone. Professeur adjoint, puis professeur titulaire à partir de 1979, il a assumé le poste de Chef du Département d'Orthodontie à partir de 1992 et a été promu pour diriger le Département des Sciences Craniofaciales en 2004, dont les divisions de chirurgie orale et maxillo-faciale, de dentisterie pédiatrique, de l'enseignement supérieur en dentisterie générale et en orthodontie.

Il est membre et ancien président de la composante Atlantique Nord de la Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists. Il occupe actuellement la fonction de rédacteur en chef de Progress in Orthodontics, de rédacteur associé du Journal of Clinical Orthodontics et est membre du comité éditorial de neuf revues d'orthodontie nationales et internationales. Il est membre de l'Association dentaire américaine, de l'Association dentaire de l'État du Connecticut, de la Hartford Dental Society, de l'Association américaine des orthodontistes, de la Société européenne d'orthodontie, de l'Association internationale de recherche dentaire et du College of Diplomates of American Board of Orthodontists.

Il a rédigé et publié sept manuels et plus de 200 articles dans des revues à comité de lecture. Il a donné des conférences magistrales dans plus de 40 pays et a reçu de nombreux prix et honneurs pour ses contributions en dentisterie et en orthodontie, aux États-Unis et de la part d'organisations internationales d'orthodontie. Il est membre d'honneur des Jordan Orthodontic Society, Czech Orthodontic Society, Taiwanese Orthodontic Society, Central American Orthodontics Society et membre d'honneur à vie de l'Indian Orthodontic Society.

Ravindra Nanda a été honoré du Life Time Achievement Award (University of Connecticut Foundation), et il est Senior Research Fellow (Japan Promotion for Science, Sendai, Japan − Tohoku University). Il a prononcé de nombreuses conférences d'honneur : la John Taylor Lecture, lors de la réunion annuelle de l'Australian Society of Orthodontics Foundation, la Sheldon Friel Memorial Lecture lors de la réunion annuelle de l'European Orthodontic Society, la Gordon Kirkness Memorial Lecture lors de la réunion annuelle de l'Australian Society of Orthodontics, la John Mershon Memorial Lecture, Boston, Massachusetts lors de la réunion annuelle de l'American Association of Orthodontics et la Wendell L. Wylie Memorial Lecture, à l'Université de San Francisco, Californie.

Collapse

Dental arch changes in postretention in Class II division 1 extraction cases

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the postretention stability of the dental arches in Class II division 1 patients treated with four bicuspid extractions and the edgewise technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A digital caliper was used to analyze the dental casts from 29 Class II division 1 malocclusion patients with skeletal type II (14 males, 15 females; ages ranging from 10.2-18.0 years), treated with four bicuspid extractions and the edgewise technique. Intercanine width, intermolar width, arch length, irregularity index, overjet and overbite were evaluated at three times: pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2) and postretention (T3) (mean: 4.15 years). Student's t-tests were used to compare the pretreatment-posttreatment, posttreatment-postretention and pretreatment-postretention. Significance was determined at P<0.05.

RESULTS

The results of the study are listed as: (1) The upper and lower intercanine widths significantly increased (P<0.05) between T1-T2 and decreased between T2-T3. However, no significant changes were observed between T1-T3; (2) The upper and lower intermolar widths significantly decreased (P<0.05) between T1-T2, between T2-T3 and between T1-T3, except for the upper intermolar width between T2-T3 which showed no significant change; (3) The upper and lower arch lengths significantly decreased (P<0.05) at posttreatment and postretention due to the closure of extraction spaces. Both the upper and lower arch lengths significantly decreased between T1-T2, T2-T3, and T1-T3, except for the upper arch length between T2-T3, which showed no significant change; (4) The irregularity index was significantly improved after treatment. However, there was a slight increase in incisor irregularity at postretention. At postretention, 75.86% of the patients had mild crowding, 20.68% had moderate crowding, 3.48% had severe crowding; (5) The overjet and overbite significantly decreased (P<0.05) between T1-T2 and increased between T2-T3.

CONCLUSION

The changes in the dental arches were small at postretention with a tendency to return towards their original position. The overall stability of Class II division 1 extraction cases is relatively good.

Arch-width changes in extraction vs nonextraction treatments in matched Class I borderline malocclusions

INTRODUCTION

The aims of this study were to identify a sample of borderline Class I extraction and nonextraction patients and to investigate posttreatment changes in arch-width and perimeter measurements.

METHODS

A parent sample of 580 Class I patients was subjected to discriminant analysis, and a borderline subsample of 62 patients, 31 treated with extraction of 4 first premolars and 31 treated without extractions, was obtained. The patients' plaster casts were digitally scanned, and the maxillary and mandibular intercanine and intermolar widths and perimeters were assessed.

RESULTS

The extraction group showed increases in maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths (P <0.001) and decreases in mandibular intermolar width and in maxillary and mandibular perimeters (P <0.001). The nonextraction group showed increases in all 4 arch-width measurements (P ≤0.003), whereas the maxillary and mandibular perimeters were maintained. The posttreatment differences between the 2 groups showed significant differences in the maxillary (P <0.001) and mandibular intermolar widths (P <0.001). Also, the comparison of the arch perimeters between the 2 treatment groups showed adjusted differences of -8.51 mm (P <0.001) and -8.44 mm (P <0.001) for the maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively. The intercanine widths showed no changes between the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Borderline Class I patients treated with extraction of 4 first premolars had decreased maxillary and mandibular intermolar and perimeter measurements compared with nonextraction patients. The maxillary and mandibular intercanine widths showed no significant difference between the 2 treatment groups.

Arch width changes in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with maxillary first premolar extraction and non-extraction method

Background

The aim of this study was to determine arch width changes during maxillary first premolars extraction and non-extraction treatment in patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion.

Material and Methods

Dental casts of 91 Class II division 1 patients (36 males and 55 females) were evaluated. The minimum age of the subjects at the beginning of treatment was above 16 years. 48 patients were treated with extraction of the maxillary first premolars and 43 patients were treated without extraction. Pre- and post-treatment maxillary and mandibular inter-canine and inter-molar arch widths were measured.

Results

At the end of treatment, maxillary and mandibular inter-canine widths of both groups increased significantly. The maxillary inter-molar width decreased in the extraction group and increased in the non-extraction group. The mandibular inter-molar width increased significantly in both groups. No significant differences were observed between males and females.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicated that there was a tendency for an increase in arch width during both the extraction and non-extraction treatment except maxillary inter-molar width in the extraction cases.

Key words:Dental arch, malocclusion, angle Class II, tooth movement, extraction.

Changes in lower dental arch dimensions and tooth alignment in young adults without orthodontic treatment

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this longitudinal study, comprising young adults without orthodontic treatment, was to assess spontaneous changes in lower dental arch alignment and dimensions.

METHODS:

Twenty pairs of dental casts of the lower arch, obtained at different time intervals, were compared. Dental casts obtained at T₁ (mean age = 20.25) and T₂ (mean age = 31.2) were compared by means of paired t-test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS:

There was significant reduction in arch dimensions: 0.43 mm for intercanine (p = 0.0089) and intermolar (p = 0.022) widths, and 1.28 mm for diagonal arch length (p < 0.001). There was a mild increase of approximately 1 mm in the irregularity index used to assess anterior alignment (p < 0.001). However, regression analysis showed that changes in the irregularity index revealed no statistically significant association with changes in the dental arch dimensions (p > 0.05). Furthermore, incisors irregularity at T₂ could not be predicted due to the severity of this variable at T₁ (p = 0.5051).

CONCLUSION:

Findings suggest that post-growth maturation of the lower dental arch leads to a reduction of dental arch dimensions as well as to a mild, yet significant, increase in dental crowding, even in individuals without orthodontic treatment. Furthermore, dental alignment in the third decade of life cannot be predicted based on the severity of dental crowding at the end of the second decade of life.

Nonextraction treatment of a skeletal Class III adolescent girl with expansion and facemask: long-term stability

This article describes the combined use of maxillary expansion and a protraction facemask in the correction of a skeletal Class III malocclusion after the patient's pubertal growth spurt. Treatment efficacy and the effects on facial and smile esthetics are presented. The nonextraction option with an arch-size increase and stability issues is discussed.

Maxillary anterior alignment stability in Class I and Class II malocclusions treated with or without extraction

OBJECTIVE

To compare the postretention stability of maxillary incisors alignment in subjects with Class I and II malocclusion treated with or without extractions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample comprised 103 subjects with initial maxillary anterior irregularity greater than 3 mm and was divided into four groups: group 1 comprised 19 patients with Class I malocclusion treated with nonextraction (mean initial age = 13.06 years); group 2 comprised 19 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with nonextraction (mean initial age = 12.54 years); group 3 comprised 30 patients with Class I malocclusion treated with extractions (mean initial age = 13.16 years); group 4 comprised 35 patients with Class II malocclusion treated with extractions (mean initial age = 12.99 years). Dental casts were obtained at three different stages: pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and long-term posttreatment (T3). Maxillary incisor irregularity and arch dimensions were evaluated. Intergroup comparisons were performed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey tests.

RESULTS

In the long-term posttreatment period, relapse of maxillary crowding and arch dimensions was similar in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Changes in maxillary anterior alignment in Class I and Class II malocclusions treated with nonextractions and with extractions were similar in the long-term posttreatment period.

Interproximal wear versus incisors extraction to solve anterior lower crowding: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine by means of a systematic review the best treatment, whether interproximal wear or incisor extraction, to correct anterior lower crowding in Class I patients in permanent dentition.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science to retrieve studies published between January 1950 and October 2013. In selecting the sample, the following inclusion criteria were applied: studies involving interproximal wear and/or extraction of mandibular incisors, as well as Class I cases with anterior lower crowding in permanent dentition.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 943 articles found after excluding duplicates, 925 were excluded after abstract analysis. After full articles were read, 13 were excluded by the eligibility criteria and one due to methodological quality; therefore, only fours articles remained: two retrospective and two randomized prospective studies. Data were collected, analyzed and organized in tables.

CONCLUSION

Both interproximal wear and mandibular incisor extraction are effective in treating Class I malocclusion in permanent dentition with moderate anterior lower crowding and pleasant facial profile. There is scant evidence to determine the best treatment option for each case. Clinical decision should be made on an individual basis by taking into account dental characteristics, crowding, dental and oral health, patient's expectations and the use of set-up models.

Canine retraction: A systematic review of different methods used

Canine retraction is a very important step in treatment of patients with crowding, or first premolar extraction cases. In severe crowding cases until, the canines have been distilized to relive the crowding, space to correctly align the incisors will not be available. Correct positioning of the canines after retraction is of great importance for the function, stability, and esthetics. The aim of this systematic review was to examine, in an evidence-based way, which kinds of canine retraction methods/techniques are most effective and which have the least side effects. A literature survey was performed by applying the Medline Database (Entrez PubMed) and Science Direct database covering the period from 1985 to 2014, to find out efficient ways to accomplish canine retraction. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective controlled studies, and clinical trials were included. Two reviewers selected and extracted the data independently and assessed the quality of the retrieved studies. The search strategy resulted in 324 articles, of which 22 met the inclusion criteria. Due to the vast heterogeneity in study methods, the scientific evidence was too weak to evaluate retraction efficiency during space closure. The data so far reviewed proved that elastomeric power chains, elastic threads, magnets, NiTi coil springs, corticotomies, distraction osteogenesis, and laser therapy, all are able to provide optimum rate of tooth movements. All the methods were nearly similar to each other for retraction of canines Most of the techniques lead to anchorage loss in various amounts depending on the methods used. Most of the studies had serious problems with small sample size, confounding factors, lack of method error analysis, and no blinding in measurements. To obtain reliable scientific evidence, controlled RCT's with sufficient sample sizes are needed to determine which method/technique is the most effective in the respective retraction situation. Further studies should also consider patient acceptance and cost analysis as well as implants and minor surgeries for canine retraction.

Transversal changes in dental arches from non-extraction treatment with self ligating brackets

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed at analyzing, with the use of dental casts, the transverse changes of the upper and lower dental arches, after non-extraction orthodontic treatment, with self-ligating brackets.

METHODS

The sample comprised 29 patients, all presenting Class I malocclusion with upper and lower crowding of at least 4 mm and treated only with a fixed appliance, without stripping, extraction or distalization. The dental casts were obtained before and after leveling with 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel archwires.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that the majority of transverse changes occurred at the premolar areas, both the first and the second, as well as on the upper and lower dental arches. The intercanine distance increased 0.75 mm, on average, in the upper arch and 1.96 mm in the lower arch. The molars also demonstrated a tendency towards an increase in their transverse dimension, however, at a lower intensity comparing to premolars. All measurements presented statistically significant differences with the exception of the maxillary second molars.

Long-term stability of maxillary anterior alignment in non-extraction cases

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate long-term stability of maxillary incisors alignment in cases submitted to non-extraction orthodontic treatment. METHODS: The sample comprised 23 patients (13 female; 10 male) at a mean initial age of 13.36 years (SD = 1.81 years), treated with fixed appliances. Dental cast measurements were obtained at three different time points (T1 - pretreatment, T2 - posttreatment and T3 - long-term posttreatment). Variables assessed in maxillary arch were Little Irregularity Index, intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar widths, arch length and perimeter. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey tests when necessary. Pearson' correlation coefficients were used to investigate possible associations between the evaluated variables. RESULTS: There was no significant change in most arch dimension measurements during and after treatment, however, during the long-term posttreatment period, it was observed a significant maxillary incisors crowding relapse. CONCLUSION: The maxillary incisors irregularity increased significantly (1.52 mm) during long-term posttreatment. None of the studied clinical factors demonstrated to be predictive of the maxillary crowding relapse.

Stability of maxillary anterior crowding treatment

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the stability and the relapse of maxillary anterior crowding treatment on cases with premolar extraction and evaluate the tendency of the teeth to return to their pretreatment position. METHODS: The experimental sample consisted of 70 patients of both sex with an initial Class I and Class II maloclusion and treated with first premolar extractions. The initial mean age was 13,08 years. Dental casts' measurements were obtained at three stages (pretreatment, posttreatment and posttreatment of 9 years on average) and the variables assessed were Little Irregularity Index, maxillary arch length and intercanine. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to know if some studied variable would have influence on the crowding in the three stages (LII1, LII2, LII3) and in each linear displacement of the Little irregularity index (A, B, C, D, E) in the initial and post-retention phases. RESULTS: The maxillary crowding relapse ( LII3-2) is influenced by the initial ( LII1), and the teeth tend to return to their pretreatment position. CONCLUSION: The results underline the attention that the orthodontist should be given to the maxillary anterior relapse, primarily on those teeth that are crowded before the treatment.

Facial and dental alterations according to the breathing pattern

There is controversy in the literature about possible interaction of the respiratory mode with the facial and dental structures.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to perform a longitudinal assessment of the changes in facial and dental structures in Angle's Class II, division 1 malocclusion individuals, divided according to the respiratory pattern (predominantly nasal or mouth), at two distinct moments of craniofacial development.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pogonium and nose measurements were made on the lateral cephalometric tracings (LS'-Pog', LS'-B', B'-Pog', Pog'-PogTeg', Line NB, Pog-NB, N'-Prn, Prn-NPog, N-Prn-Sn, Prn-Sn-LS). Dental measurements were made on the plaster models (distances between the tips of the canine cusps and the tips of mesial cusps of the first molars) of 40 individuals aged 10 to 14 years (moment 1) and 13 to 16 years (moment 2), 23 being nose breathers (NB) and 17 being predominantly mouth breathers (MB).

RESULTS

The Student's-t test and two-way ANOVA with repeated measures were applied to indicate differences between the mean values of these variables according to the moments and/or respiratory mode.

CONCLUSIONS

There were alterations in the facial measurements, without interference of the breathing pattern. However, the breathing pattern influenced dental alterations.

Um método para o retratamento da recidiva do desalinhamento dentário

INTRODUÇÃO: o ortodontista clínico deve esperar alguma perda do alinhamento dentário obtido durante o tratamento ortodôntico nos casos em que a contenção ortodôntica foi suspensa pelo profissional ou perdida pelo paciente. Nessa situação, os pacientes são, frequentemente, relutantes em novamente usar braquetes para retratar o alinhamento dentário perdido após o tratamento. OBJETIVO: esse artigo descreve o uso de uma técnica simples e eficiente para corrigir pequenas alterações do alinhamento dentário. Esse procedimento, inovador e de baixo custo, produz a resolução da recidiva em poucas semanas. A força usada para realinhar os dentes é obtida através de um fio elastomérico transparente amarrado a uma contenção fixa, de vários filamentos, colada às arcadas superior e inferior.

Recidiva do apinhamento anterossuperior nas más oclusões de Classe I e Classe II tratadas ortodonticamente sem extrações

OBJETIVO: o presente estudo objetivou comparar retrospectivamente a estabilidade pós-contenção do alinhamento dos incisivos anterossuperiores em pacientes com Classe I e Classe II. MÉTODOS: a amostra consistiu de 38 pacientes de ambos os sexos, tratados sem extrações e com mecânica Edgewise, divididos em dois grupos - Grupo 1, constituído por 19 pacientes, com idade inicial média de 13,06 anos, portadores da má oclusão de Classe I com apinhamento anterossuperior inicial maior que 3mm; Grupo 2, constituído por 19 pacientes, com idade inicial de 12,54 anos, portadores da má oclusão de Classe II e, também, com apinhamento anterossuperior inicial maior que 3mm. Foram medidos nos modelos de estudo, das fases pré- e pós-tratamento e pós-contenção, o índice de irregularidade de Little, as distâncias intercaninos e entre os primeiros e segundos pré-molares, a distância intermolares e o comprimento da arcada superior. Para a comparação intragrupo nos 3 tempos de avaliação, utilizou-se os testes ANOVA e Tukey. A comparação intergrupos foi realizada pelo teste t independente. Para verificação da presença de correlação, utilizou-se o teste de correlação de Pearson. RESULTADOS: os resultados evidenciaram maior estabilidade do tratamento no Grupo 2 (Classe II), pois, durante o período pós-contenção, foi observada recidiva do apinhamento dos dentes anterossuperiores menor no Grupo 2 (0,80mm) do que no Grupo 1 (1,67mm). CONCLUSÃO: concluiu-se que o tratamento do apinhamento dos dentes anterossuperiores é mais estável na má oclusão de Classe II do que na má oclusão de Classe I.

Stability and relapse of maxillary anterior crowding treatment in class I and class II Division 1 malocclusions

INTRODUCTION

The maxillary anterior teeth are the most important to facial esthetics because they are the first to show on a smile. Therefore, stability of the maxillary anterior teeth alignment is an important issue. The objective of this study was to compare the stability of maxillary anterior tooth alignment in Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusions.

METHODS

The sample comprised dental casts of 70 patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusions and a minimum of 3 mm of maxillary anterior crowding measured by an irregularity index. The patients were treated with extractions and evaluated at pretreatment and posttreatment and at least 5 years after treatment. The sample was divided into 3 groups: group 1, Class I malocclusion treated with 4 first premolar extractions comprising 30 subjects, with an initial age of 13.16 years and 8.59 mm of initial maxillary irregularity; group 2, Class II malocclusion treated with 4 first premolar extractions comprising 20 subjects, with an initial age of 12.95 years and 11.10 mm of maxillary irregularity; and group 3, Class II malocclusion treated with 2 first maxillary premolar extractions comprising 20 subjects, with an initial age of 13.09 years and 9.68 mm of maxillary irregularity.

RESULTS

The decrease in the maxillary irregularity index was significantly greater in group 2 than in group 1 during treatment. The stability of maxillary anterior alignment was 88.12% over the long term; 77% of the linear displacement of the anatomic contact points tended to return to their original positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Stability of maxillary anterior alignment between the 3 groups was similar. The stability of maxillary anterior alignment was high over the long term, but a high percentage of teeth tended to return to their original positions.