Severity of alveolar cleft before palatoplasty affects vertical maxillofacial growth in 6-year-old patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate

Correlation Between the Initial Severity of Oral Clefts at Birth in Patients With Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate and Craniofacial Morphology, Dental Arch Relationship, and Nasolabial Aesthetics During Pre-Adolescence

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To comprehensively evaluate the correlations between the severity of oral clefts at birth and the treatment outcomes during pre-adolescence in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of 21 consecutive patients with CUCLP from a cleft/craniofacial centre were obtained. All subjects were treated with nasoalveolar moulding, followed by cheiloplasty and palatoplasty. The severity was measured by anterior cleft width, anterior and posterior arch width, arch circumference and arch length on scanned plaster models taken after birth. Craniofacial morphology, dental arch relationship and nasolabial aesthetics were assessed with cephalometric measurements, GOSLON score and Asher-McDade rating (AMR), respectively. Pearson and Spearman's rank correlation tests were performed to determine correlations between initial severity parameters and the treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Pearson correlation showed negative correlations between posterior arch width at birth and maxillary position (SNA; r = -0.573, p < 0.01), mandibular position (SNB; r = -0.452, p < 0.05) and nasal prominence (N'-UNT/SN; r = -0.478, p < 0.05). A positive correlation was also found between posterior arch width at birth and maxillary inclination (SN/ANS-PNS; r = 0.454, p < 0.05). The ratio between anterior cleft width to arch length (G-L/Arch Length) demonstrated negative correlations with soft tissue facial height ratio (N'-Sn/Sn-Me'; r = -0.470, p < 0.05) and soft tissue vertical proportions (N'-Sn/N'-Gn'; r = -0.495, p < 0.05). Spearman's rank tests revealed no significant correlation between the initial severity parameters and GOSLON score and AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial severity parameters were correlated with some craniofacial characteristics but not with dental arch relationships and nasolabial aesthetics during pre-adolescence.

Comparison of a third surgical protocol for the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate: a multidisciplinary systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis builds upon our previous publication on the outcomes of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) treated with Oslo protocols (OP; vomerplasty during lip closure vs delayed hard palate closure protocols (DHPCP), comparing the outcomes of these two protocols with those of one-stage palatoplasty protocols (OSPP). A systematic search of the Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases was conducted until August 2024. In total, 162 articles (156 study groups) were reviewed, including 4040 UCLP patients following OSPP, 1632 following OP, and 791 following DHPCP. The results suggest that intrinsic maxillofacial growth disturbances are common in UCLP patients, regardless of the timing or type of palatal closure. The incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency was significantly higher in OP (24%) when compared to DHPCP (9%), with OSPP showing an intermediate incidence (14%). However, these findings are of very low certainty due to evident non-reporting bias and limited data. In contrast, OP and OSPP showed lower oronasal fistula (ONF) rates (7% for OP, 10% for OSPP) compared to DHPCP (20%). Altogether, OSPP and OP are favoured over DHPCP due to the lower incidences of ONF, better overall speech outcomes, and fewer primary surgeries.

Cephalometric analyses of the correlation between nasal and maxilla morphology among adult patients with cleft

OBJECTIVE

To explore if the nasal profile is influenced by maxillary hypoplasia among patients with congenital cleft lip and palate.

METHODS

Young adult patients with cleft and noncleft controls were enrolled. Nasal and maxillary profiles were measured on lateral cephalometric radiographs. The Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey post-hoc tests were employed for intergroup comparison among various the cleft types, and Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients were calculated to detect the correlation between nasal and maxillary cephalometric measurements.

RESULTS

A total of 250 participants were enrolled, including 64 with unilateral cleft lip and alveolae; 22 with bilateral cleft lip and alveolae; 49 with unilateral cleft lip, alveolae, and palate; 35 with bilateral cleft lip, alveolae, and palate; and 80 controls. Patients with cleft demonstrated significant difference in nasal and maxillary profiles when compared with the normal controls. The nasal dorsum length had a significant positive correlation with anterior and posterior maxillary height. The upper nasal dorsum length had a significant negative correlation with the maxillary protrusion. Among patients with bilateral cleft, the nasal dorsum length was also significantly negatively correlated with the maxillary protrusion.

CONCLUSION

The nasal profile is closely related to the growth of maxillae among patients with cleft and the normal population.

Sella turcica dimensions and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate associations between sella turcica dimensions and maxillary growth in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP).

METHODS

Forty-nine patients with non-syndromic UCLP, prior to secondary alveolar bone-grafting, were included. The outcomes measured were sella turcica and maxillary cephalometric measurements, and scores representing dental arch relationships derived from dental casts. On lateral cephalograms, sella width, height, and area were measured, as well as maxillary length, height, protrusion, and inclination. Dental arch relationships were measured using the modified Huddart/Bodenham (MHB) scoring system, and translated GOSLON yardstick score. Multiple linear regression was used to assess associations between sella turcica measurements and either cephalometric parameters or MHB/GOSLON scores, including age and sex as covariables.

RESULTS

No significant associations were found between sella turcica dimensions and dental arch relationships. For cephalometric measurements, sella height and area were associated with basal maxillary length, alveolar maxillary length, and anterior maxillary height.

CONCLUSIONS

Sella height and area seem to be predictors for both maxillary length and height as assessed cephalometrically, in a sample of patients with non-syndromic UCLP.

Palatal growth changes in newborns with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate from birth until 12 months after early neonatal cheiloplasty using morphometric assessment

OBJECTIVES

To compare palatal growth changes in infants with complete unilateral (UCLP) or bilateral (BCLP) cleft lip and palate during the first year of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Upper dental arches of 68 neonates with UCLP and BCLP were evaluated using 2D and 3D morphometry based on dental casts obtained in two age categories (T0 before early neonatal cheiloplasty-UCLP 4 ± 3 days, BCLP 6 ± 5 days; T1 before palatoplasty-UCLP 10 ± 2 months, BCLP 12 ± 3 months).

RESULTS

Intensive palatal growth was manifested in both directions of the palate. Palatal growth in the anterior direction was not restricted, despite the intercanine (CC´) and anterior (LL´) widths being significantly narrowed in the BCLP group (CC´ p = 0.019, LL´ p = 0.009). The posterior dental arches were significantly enlarged (UCLP p ≤ 0.001; BCLP p ≤ 0.001). The negative effect of cleft severity on palatal length was not confirmed (p = 0.802). Variability of the palate was immense mainly in BCLP infants (T0); however, it decreased in both cleft types, confirming the formative effect of palatal growth leading to alveolar cleft closure (UCLP p ≤ 0.001; BCLP p = 0.006 on the right, 0.005 on the left).

CONCLUSIONS

Both analyzed cleft groups (UCLP, BCLP) grew favorably during the first year of life, and the palatal growth was not limited in any direction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Geometric morphometry allowed a comprehensive analysis of the palate, which can contribute to the improvement of surgical methods.

Upper airway features of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients in different growth stages

OBJECTIVES

To compare growth-related changes of skeletal and upper airway features of unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects (UCLP) with non-cleft control (NCC) subjects by using lateral cephalograms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample comprised 238 subjects, collected cross-sectionally, divided into 2 groups: 94 with UCLP, and 144 NCC, subdivided into 4 groups according to their growth stages by using cervical vertebral maturation stage (CVMS). The subgroups were defined as early childhood (stage 1), prepubertal (stage 2: CVMS I and II), pubertal (stage 3: CVMS III and IV), and postpubertal (stage 4: CVMS V and VI).

RESULTS

The maxilla was more retrognathic at stages 2, 3, and 4 in females with UCLP. The mandible was more retrognathic in UCLP at stage 1 in males, and stages 2 and 3 in females. ANB (angle between NA plane and NB plane) was significantly smaller in UCLP subjects at stage 4 for both sexes. A vertical growth pattern was seen in UCLP subjects except males at stages 2 and 3, and females at stage 2. Posterior airway space was significantly narrower at all stages in males and after stage 1 in females. Middle airway space was significantly wider at all stages in females and after stage 1 in males. Epiglottic airway space was significantly narrower in males at stage 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Age- and sex-dependent differences in skeletal morphology and upper-airway widths of the UCLP subjects were identified when compared with controls.

Influence of nasoalveolar molding on skeletal development in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate at 5 years of age

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the influence of presurgical nasoalveolar molding (NAM) on skeletal development in patients with operated unilateral cleft lip and palate at 5 years of age.

MATERIALS

Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 26 unilateral cleft lip and palate patients who had undergone presurgical NAM (NAM group) and 20 unilateral cleft lip and palate patients who did not have any presurgical NAM (non-NAM group) were analyzed. The radiographs were digitally traced using Quick Ceph Studio software (version 3.5.1.r (1151); Quick Ceph Systems, San Diego, Calif). Independent samples t tests were performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in sagittal and vertical skeletal measurements between the NAM and non-NAM groups.

CONCLUSIONS

NAM resulted in no significant difference in skeletal development in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients compared with those without NAM in early childhood.

Preoperative Cleft Lip Measurements and Maxillary Growth in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Objective

Maxillary growth in patients with cleft lip and palate is highly variable. The authors' aim was to investigate associations between preoperative cleft lip measurements and maxillary growth determined cephalometrically in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (cUCLP).

Design

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Patients

Children with cUCLP.

Methods

Preoperative cleft lip measurements were made at the time of primary cheiloplasty and available for each patient. Maxillary growth was evaluated on lateral cephalometric radiographs taken prior to any orthodontic treatment and alveolar bone grafting (8.5 ± 0.7 years). The presence of associations between preoperative cleft lip measurements and cephalometric measures of maxillary growth was determined using regression analyses.

Results

In the 58 patients included in the study, the cleft lateral lip element was deficient in height in 90% and in transverse width in 81% of patients. There was an inverse correlation between cleft lateral lip height and transverse width with a β coefficient of −0.382 ( P = .003). Patients with a more deficient cleft lateral lip height displayed a shorter maxillary length (β coefficient = 0.336; P = .010), a less protruded maxilla (β coefficient = .334; P =.008), and a shorter anterior maxillary height (β coefficient = 0.306; P = .020) than those with a less deficient cleft lateral lip height.

Conclusions

Patients with cUCLP present with varying degrees of lateral lip hypoplasia. Preoperative measures of lateral lip deficiency are related to later observed deficiencies of maxillary length, protrusion, and height.

Occlusal Classification in Relation to Original Cleft Width in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

OBJECTIVE

To determine a correlation between the width of the cleft palate measured at the time of lip adhesion, definitive lip repair, and palatoplasty and the subsequent occlusal classification of patients born with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Referral, urban, children's hospital Participants : Dental models and records of 270 patients were analyzed.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Angle occlusion classification.

RESULTS

The mean age at which occlusal classification was determined was 11 ± 0.3 years. Of the children studies, 84 were diagnosed with Class I or II occlusion, 67 were diagnosed with Class III occlusion, and 119 were lost to follow up or transferred care. Mean cleft widths were significantly larger in subjects with Class III occlusion for all measures at time of lip adhesion and definitive lip repair (P < .02). At time of palatoplasty, cleft widths were significantly greater at the alveolus (P = .025) but not at the midportion of the hard palate (P = .35) or posterior hard palate (P = .10).

CONCLUSION

Cleft widths from the lip through to the posterior hard palate are generally greater in children who are diagnosed with Class III occlusion later in life. Notably, the alveolar cleft width is significantly greater at each time point for patients who went on to develop Class III occlusion. There were no significant differences in cleft widths between patients diagnosed later with Class I and Class II occlusions.