Cephalometric effects of Twin-block and van Beek Headgear-Activator in the correction of Class II malocclusion

A comparative study of Twin-Block and van Beek Headgear-Activator on the three-dimensional morphology of the upper airway in growing children with mandibular retraction in skeletal class II malocclusion

OBJECTIVES

To compare the variations in the upper airway of children with skeletal Class II mandibular retrognathism treated with van Beek Headgear-Activator (vBHGA) and Twin-Block (TB) appliances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

40 children were involved in this retrospective study and divided into two intervention groups: the vBHGA group and the TB group, each comprising 20 individuals with an average age of 11.13 years. Employing Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Geometric Morphometric analysis, a comprehensive assessment of the upper airway's volume, minimum cross-sectional area (m-CSA), and 3D shape characteristics was conducted pre-and post-treatment.

RESULTS

The total volume, oropharynx volume, oropharynx m-CSA, and hypopharynx m-CSA significantly increased in both the vBHGA and TB groups (p < 0.05). The sole discrepancy between the two groups was observed in comparing the nasopharynx m-CSA (p < 0.05). A morphological difference was observed in the vBHGA group before and after treatment (p < 0.05), characterized by a wider and shorter airway, positioning of the posterior nasal spine closer to the anterior inferior area, and a more posterior nasopharyngeal wall. However, there were no significant shape differences between the two groups or before and after treatment within the TB group.

CONCLUSION

It appears that both vBHGA and TB interventions contribute positively to alleviating upper airway constriction. Nonetheless, the vBHGA group exhibits more alterations in the configuration of the nasopharynx.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Both orthodontic appliances have a positive impact on the upper airway but still have differences, emphasizing the need for individualized consideration when selecting orthodontic interventions.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was also registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with registration number ChiCTR2400086867.

Effects of clear aligners and traditional removable appliances on oral microbiome in mixed dentition: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

This prospective study aims to investigate the comparative effects of clear aligners (CA) and traditional removable appliances (RA) on the cariogenic risk of patients in mixed dentition, focusing on the oral microbiome.

METHODS

25 children were included and assigned into CA and RA groups. Supragingival plaque and saliva samples were collected, and clinical parameters including Decay-missing-filled teeth index (DMFT), Plaque Index (PI) and Gorelick Index (GI) were recorded before treatment (T0) and after 6-month follow-up (T1). DNA was extracted from supragingival plaque and saliva and analyzed via 16S rDNA gene sequencing.

RESULTS

Clinical parameters showed no statistically significant difference between groups at each time point or within group over time (p > 0.05). In both RA and CA groups, saliva exhibited significantly higher alpha diversity compared to supragingival plaque at T1, as indicated by the significantly higher Chao1 and Shannon indexes (p < 0.05). Regarding beta diversity, significant difference was observed in saliva and supragingival plaque samples between T0 and T1 within group RA (p < 0.05, Adonis), whereas no such significance was noted in the CA group (p > 0.05, Adonis). At the genus level, Lactobacillus exhibited a statistically significant increase in saliva and supragingival plaque of group RA from T0 to T1 (p < 0.05), and an increasing trend in the group CA without statistical significance (p > 0.05). At T1, Lactobacillus levels were comparable between groups, whereas species-level analysis revealed distinct cariogenic species.

CONCLUSION

Both clear aligners and traditional removable appliances resulted in elevated cariogenic risk of patients in mixed dentition at the microbial level. Distinct alterations in cariogenic species were observed to be induced by various orthodontic appliances.

New Solution in the Treatment of Children with Class II Malocclusion: Biblock Appliance

BACKGROUND

A new design, the Biblock appliance, was developed for the functional treatment of Class II malocclusions.

AIM

To compare the effects of Biblock appliance (BA) and Activator appliance (AA) on the skeleton, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue in Class II malocclusions.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with mandibular retrognathia caused by skeletal Class II malocclusion and normodivergent growth pattern were included in this study. After selecting the BA group (n = 17, 8 boys and 9 girls, mean age = 12.08 ± 0.37 years), we selected the active control group treated with AA (n = 18, 9 boys and 9 girls, mean age = 12.3 ± 0.27 years), which matched the BA group's development and gender. All patients were between PP2 = DP3u periods according to hand-wrist maturation. Cephalometric variables related to the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue were measured.

RESULTS

Treatment duration was 18.17 ± 1.45 months with BA and 16.92 ± 1.09 months with AA. Skeletal Class II malocclusion improved significantly in both groups. In the compared groups, the increase in ANS-Me was significantly higher in the AA group (P < 0.05). The Cd⊥SN and S-Cd increase in the compared groups was significantly higher in the BA group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in measurements between the groups in skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue measurements (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The effects of AA, an appliance accepted by the orthodontic community, and BA, a new design, on the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue were similar.

Clear Aligners in the Growing Patient: A Systematic Review

Mixed dentition represents a critical phase in the oral development of pediatric patients, characterized by the simultaneous presence of primary and permanent teeth. This article proposes a comprehensive systematic review of the application of aligners as an innovative methodology in managing mixed dentition. The primary objective is to explore the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of this emerging orthodontic technology in the evolving age group. This systematic review focuses on randomized controlled trials, cohorts, and observational studies investigating the use of aligners in patients with mixed dentition. Clinical, radiographic, and psychosocial parameters will be considered to assess the overall impact of aligner therapy in this critical phase of dental development. An in-depth analysis of such data aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential of this technology in pediatric orthodontics. Expected outcomes may contribute to outlining practical guidelines and targeted therapeutic strategies for orthodontists involved in managing mixed dentition. Furthermore, this article aims to identify gaps in the current research and suggest future directions for studies exploring the use of transparent aligners in patients with mixed dentition, thereby contributing to the ongoing evolution of evidence-based orthodontic practices.

Stability of class II correction with the Austro Repositioner associated with multi-brackets fixed appliances in dolichofacial patients

BACKGROUND

The purposes of the present study were to evaluate the changes produced by the Austro Repositioner, and to assess the stability of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Austro Repositioner associated with fixed appliances and its capacity to control the vertical dimension in dolichofacial patients.

METHODS

A group of patients with Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathism and a dolichofacial growth pattern treated with the Austro Repositioner combined with fixed appliances were compared to a matched untreated control group of subjects with Class II malocclusion. Evaluations were made on the basis of lateral cephalograms taken at T1 (initial records), T2 (end of treatment), and T3 (1 year after treatment). Statistical comparisons were performed with paired- and two-sample t tests.

RESULTS

The experimental (treated) group comprised 30 patients, 14 boys and 16 girls, and the control group comprised 30 subjects (15 boys and 15 girls) with similar ages at T1, T2 and T3. In the treated group, a significant decrease in the ANB angle was found (- 3.79 ± 1.46; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the maxillary skeletal measurements. In contrast, the SNB angle showed a significant increase of 3.77 ± 1.49 in the treated group compared with a nonsignificant increase of 0.77 ± 1.55 in the control group (p = 0.002). Vertical changes showed a significant decrease in the FMA angle (- 3.36 ± 1.62), while the lower anterior facial height distance and the overbite increased significantly in the treated group, reflecting a change in vertical dimensions after treatment. No significant changes were observed in either the treated or control group during the one-year posttreatment period; thus, the treatment results remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

The Austro Repositioner combined with fixed appliances could be considered an optimal treatment modality in Class II dolichofacial patients.