Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications

Impact of morbid obesity on surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node staging

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgery is the preferred surgical approach in endometrial cancer. Robotic assisted laparoscopy could provide benefits in the obese population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical and oncological outcomes between patients with a BMI < 35 kg/m2 (Group 1) and those with a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (Group 2) who underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic total non-conservative hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node staging for endometrial cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study was conducted at Saint-Louis University Hospital in Paris. The two groups were compared using a univariate analysis.

RESULTS

52 patients were included, 39 patients in Group 1 and 13 patients in Group 2. Operative room occupancy time and operative time were significantly longer in Group 2 than in Group 1 (255.1 min ± 57.0 vs 210.5 min ± 38.3, p = 0.02 and 166.8 min ± 39.7 vs 139.6 min ± 35.3, p = 0.04 respectively). No significant difference was found in length of hospital stay between the 2 groups even if it appears that patients in Group 2 had slightly longer hospitalization than patients in Group 1 (2 days vs 1 day). Only one complication (laparotomy conversion for digestive injury) was observed in Group 2. No significant difference was found in recurrence between the 2 groups.

DISCUSSION

Severe morbid obesity does not affect surgical morbidity or oncological outcomes in women with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and pelvic lymph node staging. Optimizing operating room occupancy management must be improved in this patient population.

Conversion from Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Open Surgery Among Patients with Endometrial Cancer in the SGO Clinical Outcomes Registry

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer (EC) ranks as the most common gynecologic malignancy in the USA. While minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have revolutionized EC management, conversion to laparotomy remains a concern due to the loss of laparoscopic benefits such as fewer surgical site infections and shorter hospital stays with reported rates varying widely. Factors influencing this conversion, including patient characteristics and tumor attributes, have not been fully understood. Our study aims to provide a framework for identifying patients at higher risk of conversion, thereby helping to inform surgical decision-making and patient counseling Addressing this gap, our study employs a national registry to analyze patient- and tumor-related factors associated with the transition from MIS to open surgery in EC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We queried the SGO Clinical Outcomes Registry (COR) to identify all patients with EC who underwent surgical management. The COR indeed validated clinical data from 29 sites collected between 2014 and 2018. The primary outcome was to assess the conversion rate from MIS to open surgery. Descriptive statistics using means with standard deviations or frequency with percentages were used. Chi-squared analysis was used to examine the bivariate relationship between group status and the subjects' demographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 3.4% (135/4028) of patients underwent conversion from MIS to open surgery. Demographic characteristics were balanced between the groups. Conversion was more prevalent in patients with obesity (29%) and morbid obesity (37%) than in patients who are underweight (2%), normal weight (16%), and overweight (16%). Similarly, conversion was more prevalent in patients with prior abdominal surgery (63% versus 52%; P = 0.001). Endometrioid (EC) predominated (59%) in the converted group, with higher-than-expected non-endometrioid rates (serous carcinoma 16%, clear cell carcinoma 4%, carcinosarcoma 5%, mixed histology 12%; all P < 0.01). Advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages were more common in patients who converted to open surgery (stage II: 5%, stage III: 25%, stage IV: 9%; all P < 0.001). Type II (24%) and type III (5%) hysterectomies were more frequent in patients who converted to open (P < 0.001). Logistic regression indicated body mass index (BMI), prior surgery, FIGO stage, histology, and hysterectomy type affected conversion (P < 0.001), explaining 12.3% of the variance in the conversion outcome. Indications for conversion included uterine size, adhesions, and disease extent.

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of MIS has become increasingly common standard of care for managing EC, attributed to enhanced perioperative outcomes. Factors associated with conversion such as uterine size, prior abdominal surgeries, surgical complexity, disease extent, and histologic types can affect the surgeon's choice. Ultimately, a personalized surgical approach, tailored to individual patient attributes, remains pivotal for optimizing outcomes in EC management.

Comparison of laparoscopic vs. robotic sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy in endometrial cancer

We compare the success of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy between standard laparoscopy and robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) in patients with endometrial cancer. Patients with uterine epithelial tumour types undergoing staging surgery were identified from January 2019 to March 2023. Included patients underwent a total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and attempted bilateral SLN biopsy with indigocyanine green (ICG) dye, utilising either standard laparoscopy or RAL. 298 patients met the inclusion criteria. 211 (70.8%) had standard laparoscopy and 87 (29.2%) underwent RAL. The RAL cohort had significantly higher median body mass index (BMI) compared to standard laparoscopy (37 vs. 28 kg/m2, p < 0.001). The overall rate of successful bilateral SLN biopsy was 66.8% (n = 199), and at least one hemi-pelvis was successfully biopsied in 87.3% (n = 260) of patients. There was no significant difference in bilateral SLN biopsy success between RAL and standard laparoscopy (60.9% vs 69.2%, p = 0.17). RAL was not predictive of bilateral SLN biopsy success in multivariate analysis (OR 1.10, p = 0.76). There was no difference in SLN biopsy location, number of nodes identified, or empty-packet dissections between the surgical approaches. Increasing age (OR 0.96, p = 0.002) and BMI (OR 0.94, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with reduced bilateral SLN biopsy success. Between the learning and experienced periods of the study, the bilateral SLN biopsy success rate improved significantly for RAL (40.6 vs. 72.7%, p = 0.03), which was not found with standard laparoscopy. The decision to perform RAL should consider multiple factors including surgeon experience. Future research should be directed towards prospective, randomised and BMI-matched cohorts.

Comparison of tracer application methods for sentinel lymph node detection in open surgery patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different tracers´ application techniques for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in women with endometrial cancer undergoing laparotomy. Additionally, potential risk factors for SLN detection failure were assessed.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 248 endometrial cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery with SLN mapping between January 2020 and March 2024. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and either Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Group I + S consisted of 147 women with intracervical and subserosal tracers´application and group I + I included 101 women with intracervical and intrafundal application. Successful detection of SLN on both sides was achieved in 39.9% (99/248) of all patients, in 38.1% (56/147) in the I + S group and in 42.6% (43/101) in the I + I group, respectively. SLNs were identified in 32.7% (81/248) of all patients on only one side of the pelvis, in 31.3% (46/147) in the I + S and in 34.7% (35/101) in the I + I group, respectively. No SLNs were detected in 27.4% (68/248) of all subjects, comprising 30.6% (45/147) from the I + S and 22.8% (23/101) from the I + I group. Although the success rate of SLN detection was higher in the I + I group and on the right side of the pelvis regardless of the detection method, these differences were not statistically significant. An age exceeding 66.3 years was recognized as a critical risk factor for successful detection, other followed factors did not demonstrate a statistically significant impact on overall detection success. Additional significant risk factors were identified: depth of tumor myometrial invasion on the right side, history of pelvic surgery, and total tumor volume on the left side.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not reveal significant differences in SLN mapping success between the groups receiving intracervical + intrafundal and intracervical + subserosal tracers´applications among endometrial cancer patients treated via open surgery. Overall, older age emerged as the most critical risk factor for SLN detection failure, while other assessed factors did not show a statistically significant impact on overall detection success.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Institution University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

EK-VP-21-0-2023. Date of registration 7-JUN-2023. This study was retrospectively registered in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: An observational study in a French tertiary teaching hospital at the beginning of the learning curve

INTRODUCTION

The role of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopy (RAL) versus conventional laparoscopy (CL) in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer remains a matter of debate. We aimed to compare RAL and CL in terms of clinical outcomes (hospital stay characteristics and 3-month complications) in patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective study in a tertiary teaching hospital comparing two groups of women who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma by RAL performed by a surgeon during the beginning of learning curve, or CL.

RESULTS

Of the 110 patients included, 56 were in the RAL group and 54 in the CL group. The patients in the RAL group were significantly older (71.6±8.7 vs 67.8±9.7, p=0.031) and had a higher BMI (33.1±7.0 vs 29.8±6.1, p=0.030) than those in the CL group. Operating room occupancy time was higher with RAL (4.6 hours±1.3 vs 3.5±1.3, p<0.001). Although less spinal analgesia was used in the RAL group (35% vs 74%, p<0.001), the patients in this group consumed less postoperative paracetamol (9.4g±5.3 vs 13.0±9.9, p=0.032) meaning faster recovery. Conversely, there was a higher rate of unplanned consultations during the 3-month follow-up in the RAL vs CL group (18.5% vs 3.6%, p=0.012).

DISCUSSION

RAL was associated with less postoperative pain even at the beginning of learning curve. Surgeons were more likely to perform RAL than CL for older and/or obese patients, suggesting they intuitively consider RAL of added benefit for these patients.

Robotic Surgery in Severely Obese Frail Patients for the Treatment of Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Propensity-Match Analysis at an ESGO-Accredited Center

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RS) has been widely adopted for the management of endometrial cancer (EC) due to favorable perioperative outcomes, especially in the context of obesity, which is an established risk factor for EC. This study retrospectively evaluated the perioperative outcomes of RS versus conventional laparoscopy (LS) in treating EC and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH).

METHODS

Between November 2021 and October 2023, 138 patients with AH or EC underwent surgery at the Clinic of Obstetric and Gynecological-Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine. All patients had total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with or without lymphadenectomy or sentinel lymph node biopsy. The study included 62 patients treated with LS and 62 with RS.

RESULTS

The median BMI was higher in the RS group (35.5 vs. 24 kg/m2, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in operative time between the laparoscopic group and the robotic console time (median 130 vs. 130 min, p = 0.131). No significant differences were found in terms of blood loss, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative complications, hospital stay, or early postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm the feasibility of robotic surgery in obese patients, allowing surgical results comparable to those of laparoscopy in normal-weight patients.

Different surgical methods of hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Emerging surgical methods are utilized to treat endometrial cancer. The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of four common surgical methods of hysterectomy.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science from their inception until April 30, 2024. We used hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS), odds ratios (OR) for categorical outcomes, and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. These were pooled in Bayesian network meta-analysis models. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to illuminate the probability that each method would be the best for each outcome.

Results

Thirty studies comprising 13446 patients were included. Robotic hysterectomy (RH) retrieved fewer pelvic lymph nodes than open hysterectomy (OH). OH showed a significantly higher postoperative complication rate than laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and RH. LH had a higher intraoperative complication rate than OH. According to SUCRA values, OH ranked the highest in the number of retrieved pelvic lymph nodes (0.89), intraoperative complications (0.73), and operative time (0.97). LH ranked the highest in DFS (0.81) and overall survival (OS) (0.87). RH ranked the highest in the postoperative complications (0.95). Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) ranked the highest in number of retrieved para-aortic lymph nodes (0.72).

Conclusions

There are no significant differences among the four surgical methods in DFS or OS. The use of uterine manipulators does not affect prognosis. OH is the best method for shortening operative time, dissecting the pelvic lymph nodes and controlling intraoperative complications. LH and LAVH have an advantage in para-aortic lymph node dissection. Besides, LH has the best advantage in DFS and OS. RH has advantages in controlling surgical complications.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024529974.

Surgical Outcomes of Multiple Robot-Assisted Hysterectomies in a Single Workday by the Same Surgeon

INTRODUCTION

Due to the growing medical need for gynecologic robotic surgery, several robotic surgeries may be performed in a single day at high-volume centers. This study evaluated the safety of performing multiple robot-assisted hysterectomies (RAHs) per day by the same surgeon.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent robotic surgery from April 2018 to September 2024 at the Department of Gynecology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, and also examined the surgical type, order, and surgeon for each procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 352 RAHs performed by the same surgeon were included. Among them, 267 were the first and second cases performed on the same day (Group A), and 85 were the third to fifth cases (Group B). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding age, body mass index, uterine weight, surgical indication, and history of abdominal surgery. The median operative time of 68 (35-179) min in Group A and 66 (37-187) min in Group B was similar (p = 0.141). Both groups also had similar estimated blood loss (p = 0.744). Each group had two perioperative complications, and no patient underwent conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery.

CONCLUSION

Performing multiple RAHs by the same surgeon in a single day may be a safe procedure with no negative impact on operative time, blood loss, or perioperative complications. Hence, it could be a useful treatment option for high-volume centers.

Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy in morbidly obese patients with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer in morbidly obese patients is challenging. Here, we reported data regarding three minimally invasive approaches.

METHOD

This is a multicenter retrospective study evaluating 30-day and 90-day surgery-related outcomes of morbidly obese patients (those with BMI > 40kg/m2) undergoing robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.

RESULTS

Charts of 95 morbidly obese patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer were retrieved. Overall, robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgeries were performed in 35 (36.8%), 38 (40%), and 22 (23.2%) patients, respectively. Patients having robotic-assisted surgery experienced longer operative time than patients having vaginal and laparoscopic approaches (p < 0.001). Surgical approaches did not influence the risk of having intraoperative and severe (Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or more) postoperative complications. No 90-day mortality occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery represent three safe and feasible minimally invasive approaches to manage morbidly obese patients with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer.

Combined robotic surgery for concomitant treatment of endometrial cancer and obesity

BACKGROUND

Endometrial Cancer (EC) is strongly linked to obesity. Bariatric surgery is recognized as a long-term solution for weight loss in severely obese patients. This pilot study investigates the feasibility, intraoperative and 30-day morbidity outcomes of integrating gynecological surgical staging and bariatric robotic surgery in class II and III obese patients affected by early EC or Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia (EIN).

METHODS

Patients aged over 18 years old with early EC or EIN and class II and III obesity (Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2) who are surgical and anesthesiologic candidates. Standard robotic surgery for early EC staging performed alone (THBSO group) or in conjunction with sleeve gastrectomy (THBSO + SG group) for obesity management was proposed.

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 5 (38.46%) opted for combined surgery. The groups showed a significant difference in preoperative BMI (49.68 kg/m2 vs. 40.24 kg/m2 p = 0.017 with and without SG), preoperative weight (143.92 kg vs. 105.62 kg p = 0.004 with and without SG), preoperative (p = 0.01) and postoperative (p = 0.005) aspartate transaminase (AST). The THBSO + SG group had higher anesthesia induction end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) (p = 0.05), final Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) (p = 0.044), anesthesia induction lactate (p = 0.001) and final lactate (p = 0.011) without a significant difference in final pH (p = 0.31). Operative time was longer in the THBSO + SG group (p < 0.001), but this did not result in longer ICU (p = 0.351), total hospital stays (p = 0.208), nor increased blood loss and transfusion. The simultaneous combined approach had an 80% success rate. At 6 months, the THBSO + SG group achieved significantly greater weight loss than the THBSO group (ΔBMI - 11.81 kg/m2 vs - 1.72 kg/m2, p = 0.003, with and without SG).

CONCLUSION

Integrating robotic EC staging with SG in obese women with early EC increased the operative time without increasing intraoperative risks, early and 30 days post-surgery complication and offering a promising approach to simultaneously treating both conditions.

Comparing oncological outcomes of robotic versus open surgery in the treatment of endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

Robotic surgery has been incorporated in the treatment of endometrial cancer, with evidence suggesting that minimal access surgery offers advantages over laparotomy including less blood loss, lower rate of perioperative complications, and accelerated postoperative recovery. The laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer (LACC) study has recently demonstrated inferior survival outcomes in cervical cancer patients treated with minimal access surgery including robotic surgery. It is, therefore, imperative that further evaluation of the latter in endometrial cancer is performed.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of clinical data was performed. We compared two different types of surgery performed for the treatment of FIGO stage 1 to 3 endometrial cancer; open surgery performed in the years 2013-2015 vs robotic surgery performed in 2017-2019, after the implementation of the robotic program in our institution. Main outcome measures were recurrence-free survival and overall survival, with secondary outcomes including surgical morbidity and postoperative recovery.

RESULTS

We compared 123 patients who had open surgery with 104 patients who underwent robotic surgery. One case from the second group was converted to open surgery due to the inability to complete it robotically. After a median follow-up of 68 months, there was no difference in recurrence-free survival or overall survival between the two groups. Length of stay after an operation was significantly different with mean hospital stay of 1.6 days after robotic surgery and 5 days after open surgery (p = 0.001). No significant difference was identified in the rate of complications (p = 0.304).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis has demonstrated that robotic surgery offers better perioperative outcomes without compromising the oncological safety.

An eight-year analysis of robotic surgery in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer in a tertiary center in Singapore

Introduction

Surgical management of endometrial cancer is a total hysterectomy, bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (THBSO-PLND), which is a challenging surgery in the morbidly obese. Data on morbidly obese women undergoing robotic surgery is limited in Asia. We share our experience in Singapore and aim to demonstrate that robotic surgery is safe and effective in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with BMI > 40 kg/m2, who underwent robotic surgery from January 2016 to September 2023 at the Singapore General Hospital. We recruited a total of 33 patients who underwent robotic surgery for endometrial malignancy and analysed surgical outcomes, operative complications, and survival rates.

Results

The average age of patients was 53 years and mean BMI 45.7. The average operative time was 232 min and average blood loss 184 ml. 3 patients had THBSO while 27 underwent THBSO-PLND. None required conversion to laparotomy. 4 patients required a mini-laparotomy for the retrieval of bulky uterus. 12 required adhesiolysis. 6 patients had additional omentectomy done. The average inpatient stay was 4.8 days. The 1-year mortality rate is 0. However, 1 patient passed away 13 months after surgery due to complications from bowel obstruction and another passed away 39 months later due to disease recurrence. 1 patient readmitted on POD6 due to post-op ileus and another for port-site hematoma. Both were managed conservatively.

Conclusion

Robotic surgery is a safe and effective alternative surgical tool for women who are morbidly obese with endometrial cancer.

Impact of Robotic Assistance on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Type II Endometrial Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis

The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival (OS) and surgical outcomes between conventional laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) in women with type II endometrial cancer. We identified a large cohort of women who underwent hysterectomy for type II endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome was to compare the OS of conventional laparoscopy versus RAL. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, 90-day mortality, rates of lymph node retrieval, rates of node positivity, and rates of conversion to laparotomy. Cohorts were compared and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine characteristics with statistically significant predictors of outcome. We identified 7168 patients with stage I-III type II endometrial cancer who had minimally invasive surgery as primary treatment between 2010 and 2014. A total of 5074 patients underwent RAL. Women who underwent RAL were less likely to have stage III disease (26.4% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.008) and had smaller primary tumors (4.6 vs. 4.1 cm, p < 0.001). In a multivariable model, there was no difference in OS between conventional laparoscopy and RAL. With regard to postoperative outcomes, RAL was associated with a decreased risk for conversion to laparotomy (2.7% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), a shorter hospital stay (1 vs. 2 days, p < 0.001), a decreased 90-day mortality (1.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.004), and an increased number of lymph nodes sampled (14 vs. 12, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the use of RAL was independently associated with a reduced rate of conversion to laparotomy. In conclusion, there was no difference in OS between conventional laparoscopy and RAL in type II endometrial cancer in a large retrospective cohort of patients from the NCDB. RAL was associated with a decreased risk of conversion to laparotomy.

The tumour-derived extracellular vesicle proteome varies by endometrial cancer histology and is confounded by an obesogenic environment

Endometrial cancer, the most common gynaecological cancer worldwide, is closely linked to obesity and metabolic diseases, particularly in younger women. New circulating biomarkers have the potential to improve diagnosis and treatment selections, which could significantly improve outcomes. Our approach focuses on extracellular vesicle (EV) biomarker discovery by directly profiling the proteome of EVs enriched from frozen biobanked endometrial tumours. We analysed nine tissue samples to compare three clinical subgroups-low BMI (Body Mass Index) Endometrioid, high BMI Endometrioid, and Serous (any BMI)-identifying proteins related to histological subtype, BMI, and shared secreted proteins. Using collagenase digestion and size exclusion chromatography, we successfully enriched generous quantities of EVs (range 204.8-1291.0 µg protein: 1.38 × 1011-1.10 × 1012 particles), characterised by their size (∼150 nm), expression of EV markers (CD63/81), and proposed endometrial cancer markers (L1CAM, ANXA2). Mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiling identified 2075 proteins present in at least one of the 18 samples. Compared to cell lysates, EVs were successfully depleted for mitochondrial and blood proteins and enriched for common EV markers and large secreted proteins. Further analysis highlighted significant differences in EV protein profiles between the high BMI subgroup and others, underlining the impact of comorbidities on the EV secretome. Interestingly, proteins differentially abundant in tissue subgroups were largely not also differential in matched EVs. This research identified secreted proteins known to be involved in endometrial cancer pathophysiology and proposed novel diagnostic biomarkers (EIF6, MUC16, PROM1, SLC26A2).

Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese)

BACKGROUND

Nearly 65% of patients with endometrial cancer who undergo primary hysterectomy have concurrent obesity. Retrospective data show advantages in using robotic surgery in these patients compared with conventional laparoscopy, namely lower conversion rate, increased rate of same-day discharge, and reduced blood loss. Nevertheless, to date no prospective randomized controlled trials have compared laparoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted surgery in morbidly obese patients.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese) trial aims to find the most appropriate minimally invasive surgical approach in morbidly obese patients with endometrial carcinoma.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

Robotic surgery will reduce conversions to laparotomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity compared with those who undergo surgery with conventional laparoscopy.

TRIAL DESIGN

This phase III multi-institutional study will randomize consecutive obese women with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer to either laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery.

MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION RITERIA

The RObese trial will include obese (BMI≥30 kg/m2) patients aged over 18 years with apparent 2009 Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IB endometriod endometrial cancer.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

Conversion rate to laparotomy between laparoscopic surgery versus robot-assisted surgery.

SAMPLE SIZE

RObese is a superiority trial. The clinical superiority margin for this study is defined as a difference in conversion rate of -6%. Assuming a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 80%, the study plans to randomize 566 patients.

ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS

Patient recruitment will be completed by 2026, and follow-up will be completed by 2029 with presentation of data shortly thereafter. Two interim analyses are planned: one after the first 188 and the second after 376 randomized patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05974995.

Visceral Adipose Tissue Percentage Compared to Body Mass Index as Better Indicator of Surgical Outcomes in Women With Obesity and Endometrial Cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact visceral adipose tissue percentage (VAT%) on surgical outcomes during minimally invasive surgery in obese women with endometrial cancer.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Mie University Hospital, Japan.

PATIENTS

Of the 73 women (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) with obesity and primary endometrial cancer, 52 underwent robotic surgery, while 21 underwent laparoscopic surgery between April 2014 and December 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

We investigated the correlation between surgical outcomes (operative time and blood loss) and obesity (BMI and visceral adipose tissue percentage [VAT%]).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Abdominal fat-related parameters were measured at the level of the umbilicus using preoperative computed tomography. A weak negative correlation was found between BMI and VAT% (CC = -0.313, p = .001). Multivariate analysis showed that VAT% had a stronger correlation to total and practical operative time than BMI (β = 0.338 vs 0.267, β = 0.311 vs 0.209, respectively) and was an independent predictor of blood loss. VAT% was an independent predictive marker prolonged for operative time and increased blood loss during lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSION

VAT% could be an indicator of surgical outcomes for patients with obesity and endometrial cancer.

Surgery Advances in Gynecologic Tumors: The Evolution and Outcomes of Robotic Surgery for Gynecologic Cancers in a Tertiary Center

The integration of innovation into routine clinical practice is faced with many challenges. In 2007, we received the mandate to evaluate how the introduction of a robotic program in gynecologic oncology affected patient-centered care by studying its impact on clinical outcomes and hospital resource utilization. Here we summarize the history and experience of developing a robotic surgery program for gynecologic cancers over 16 years. Analysis of the data indicates that robotic surgery improved perioperative patient clinical parameters, decreased blood loss, complications, and hospital stay, maintained the oncologic outcome, and is cost-effective, resulting in it becoming the dominant surgical approach in gynecologic oncology in a tertiary cancer care institution.

Does the presence of abdominal wall adhesions make gynecologic robotic surgery difficult?

This study aimed to assess the status of abdominal wall adhesions resulting from prior surgeries and their impact on the outcomes of robotic surgery. We retrospectively reviewed clinical information, surgical outcomes, and the status of abdominal wall adhesions in patients who underwent gynecologic robotic surgery at Yamanashi Central Hospital, between April 2018 and March 2023. Abdominal wall adhesions were classified into seven locations and their presence was assessed at each site. Among the 768 cases examined, 196 showed the presence of abdominal wall adhesions. Notably, patients with a history of abdominal surgery exhibited a significantly higher incidence of abdominal wall adhesions than those without such surgical history, although no significant difference was observed in the frequency of adhesions in the upper left abdomen. Patients with a history of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, or biliopancreatic surgeries were more likely to have adhesions at the umbilicus or upper abdomen sites where trocars are typically inserted during robotic surgery. Although cases with abdominal wall adhesions experienced longer operative times than those without, there was no significant difference in estimated blood loss. In 13 cases (1.7%), adjustments in trocar placement were necessary due to abdominal wall adhesions, although none of the cases required conversion to open or conventional laparoscopic surgery. Abdominal wall adhesions pose challenges to minimally invasive procedures, emphasizing the importance of predicting these adhesions based on a patient's surgical history to safely perform robotic surgery. These results suggest that the robot's flexibility proves effective in managing abdominal wall adhesions.

Risk of thrombosis and bleeding in gynecologic cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to provide procedure-specific estimates of the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism and major bleeding in the absence of thromboprophylaxis, following gynecologic cancer surgery.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted comprehensive searches on Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for observational studies. We also reviewed reference lists of eligible studies and review articles. We performed separate searches for randomized trials addressing effects of thromboprophylaxis and conducted a web-based survey on thromboprophylaxis practice.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Observational studies enrolling ≥50 adult patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery procedures reporting absolute incidence for at least 1 of the following were included: symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic venous thromboembolism, bleeding requiring reintervention (including reexploration and angioembolization), bleeding leading to transfusion, or postoperative hemoglobin <70 g/L.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility, performed data extraction, and evaluated risk of bias of eligible articles. We adjusted the reported estimates for thromboprophylaxis and length of follow-up and used the median value from studies to determine cumulative incidence at 4 weeks postsurgery stratified by patient venous thromboembolism risk factors. The GRADE approach was applied to rate evidence certainty.

RESULTS

We included 188 studies (398,167 patients) reporting on 37 gynecologic cancer surgery procedures. The evidence certainty was generally low to very low. Median symptomatic venous thromboembolism risk (in the absence of prophylaxis) was <1% in 13 of 37 (35%) procedures, 1% to 2% in 11 of 37 (30%), and >2.0% in 13 of 37 (35%). The risks of venous thromboembolism varied from 0.1% in low venous thromboembolism risk patients undergoing cervical conization to 33.5% in high venous thromboembolism risk patients undergoing pelvic exenteration. Estimates of bleeding requiring reintervention varied from <0.1% to 1.3%. Median risks of bleeding requiring reintervention were <1% in 22 of 29 (76%) and 1% to 2% in 7 of 29 (24%) procedures.

CONCLUSION

Venous thromboembolism reduction with thromboprophylaxis likely outweighs the increase in bleeding requiring reintervention in many gynecologic cancer procedures (eg, open surgery for ovarian cancer and pelvic exenteration). In some procedures (eg, laparoscopic total hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy), thromboembolism and bleeding risks are similar, and decisions depend on individual risk prediction and values and preferences regarding venous thromboembolism and bleeding.

Recent Advances in Endometrial Cancer Prevention, Early Diagnosis and Treatment

Endometrial cancer is the sixth commonest cancer in women worldwide, with over 417,000 diagnoses in 2020. The disease incidence has increased by 132% over the last 30 years and is set to continue to rise in response to an ageing population and increasing global rates of obesity and diabetes. A greater understanding of the mechanisms driving endometrial carcinogenesis has led to the identification of potential strategies for primary disease prevention, although prospective evaluation of their efficacy within clinical trials is still awaited. The early diagnosis of endometrial cancer is associated with improved survival, but has historically relied on invasive endometrial sampling. New, minimally invasive tests using protein and DNA biomarkers and cytology have the potential to transform diagnostic pathways and to allow for the surveillance of high-risk populations. The molecular classification of endometrial cancers has been shown to not only have a prognostic impact, but also to have therapeutic value and is increasingly used to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. Advanced and recurrent disease management has also been revolutionised by increasing the use of debulking surgery and targeted treatments, particularly immunotherapy. This review summarises the recent advances in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer and seeks to identify areas for future research.

The da Vinci robotic surgery system for the management of endometrial cancer: a single-center experience

The aim of this study was to report our single-center experience of the da Vinci robotic surgery system in the management of endometrial cancer (EC) patients during 2019-2023. We descriptively summarized the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes. Moreover, we conducted subgroup analyses based on obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and the intraoperative use of indocyanine green dye (ICG). Overall, 100 patients were analyzed. Eighty-five patients (85%) were obese. The mean operative time and estimated blood loss (EBL) were 240.84 ± 70.08 min (range: 110-720) and 104.2 ± 80.3 ml (range: 20-500), respectively. The mean number of retrieved pelvic LNs was 3.01 ± 3.06 (range: 0-15). The use of ICG was employed in 58 (58%). Only a single patient (1%) underwent conversion to laparotomy. Besides, only three (3%) patients experienced vaginal laceration intraoperatively, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 1.34 ± 0.69 days (range: 1-5). No patient experienced postoperative complications. Most tumors had endometrioid histology (82%), grade-1 tumor (49%), and stage-1A disease (67%). At 3-year follow-up, only two patients (2%) developed recurrence. Patients who received the ICG had significantly lower operative time (225.86 vs. 261.52 min, p = 0.011), estimated blood loss (90 vs. 123.81 ml, p = 0.037), and hospital stay (1.12 vs. 1.64 days, p < 0.001) compared with patients who did not receive it. However, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the number of retrieved pelvic LNs. Obesity had no significant impact on the rates of intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and 3-year recurrence incidence. In conclusion, robotic surgery was technically feasible and safe. The use of ICG was statistically linked to favorable outcomes, in terms of decreased operative time, EBL, and hospital stay. Obesity did not impact the perioperative surgical outcomes.

Robotic-assisted surgery in high-risk surgical patients with endometrial cancer

Many patients diagnosed with an endometrial cancer are at high-risk for surgery due to factors such as advanced age, raised body mass index or frailty. Minimally-invasive surgery, in particular robotic-assisted, is increasingly used in the surgical management of endometrial cancer however, there are a lack of clinical trials investigating outcomes in high-risk patient populations. This article will review the current evidence and identify areas of uncertainty where future research is needed.

Short-Term Outcome of Robotic versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in Women with Diabetes: Analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample

This study investigated short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer (EC) in women with diabetes. We extracted the data of hospitalized females aged ≥18 years who were diagnosed with EC and diabetes and underwent robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2005-2018. Associations between study variables and in-hospital outcomes, including complications, unfavorable discharge, length of stay (LOS), and hospital costs, were examined using logistic regression. A total of 5745 women (representing 28,176 women in the US) were included. Multivariable analysis revealed that robotic surgery was significantly associated with a decreased risk of unfavorable discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46, 0.85) than pure laparoscopic surgery. Women who underwent robotic surgery had a significantly shorter LOS (0.46 fewer days, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.35) but higher total hospital costs (6129.93 greater USD; 95% CI: 4448.74, 7811.12). Compared with pure laparoscopic surgery, robotic hysterectomy was associated with less unfavorable discharge among women aged ≥60 years (aOR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.80). For US women with EC and diabetes, robotic hysterectomy is associated with shorter LOS, decreased risk of unfavorable discharge, especially among older patients, and higher total costs than laparoscopic surgery.

Feasibility and safety of vNOTES for gynecological procedures in obese patients

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) to treat benign and malign gynecological conditions in obese patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed data from 79 obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 Kg/m2 operated by vNOTES for gynecological conditions between May 2020 and April 2023. The primary outcome was the feasibility of performing the surgery as initially planned. Data were presented for subgroups of patients with obesity class I (BMI 30.1 - 34.9 Kg/m2), class II (BMI 35.0 - 39.9 Kg/m2), and class III (BMI ≥ 40.0 Kg/m2).

RESULTS

Patients presented obesity class I in 39 cases (49.4 %), class II in 27 cases (34.2 %), and class III in 13 cases (16.4 %). Fifty-two patients (65.8 %) underwent vNOTES hysterectomy, 26 patients (32.9 %) underwent procedures limited to the adnexa, and 1 patient (1.3 %) underwent myomectomy. The conversion rate was 0 %, 11.1 %, and 7.7 % in obesity class I, II, and III, respectively. Intraoperative bladder injury was observed in 1 case (1.3 %) and rectal serosal tear in 2 cases (2.5 %). Postoperatively, we observed 3 cases (3.8 %) of wound infection, 2 cases (2.5 %) of cystitis, and 1 case (1.3 %) of deep vein thrombosis.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of performing gynecological vNOTES procedures in obese patients. However, obesity could be associated with longer and more complex interventions, especially in obesity class II and III patients.

Oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of apparent early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with clinically uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging with robot-assisted (RA) versus conventional laparoscopy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with newly diagnosed, uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancer who were treated and had primary surgery at our institution between 1/1/2009-1/1/2018. Clinicopathologic, surgical, and survival data were collected. Appropriate statistical methods were applied.

RESULTS

Of 1728 patients identified, 1389 (80.4%) underwent RA and 339 (19.6%) conventional laparoscopy. At diagnosis, median age was 60 years (range, 24-92) and median BMI was 30.2 kg/m2 (range, 15.1-71.5). In the RA group, patients had longer operative time (170 vs 152 min, P < .001), lower conversion rate to laparotomy (0.6% vs 4.7%, P < .001), and a higher proportion had a BMI > 40 kg/m2 (17.2% vs 11.5%, P = .01) and same-day discharge (19.2% vs 5.3%, P < .001). Overall, 93% (RA) and 90% (conventional) of patients underwent lymph node assessment (P = .1). Comparing the RA versus conventional groups, final surgical stage on pathology (P = .6), median follow-up (55.7 vs 52.9 months, P = .4), and rates of perioperative complications (9.9% vs 7.7%, P = .6), recurrence (9.5% vs 7.4%, P = .3), 5-year PFS (88.5% vs 91.0%, P = .3), and 5-year OS (92.5% vs 92.4%, P = .7) were not significantly different. No significant increase in risk of recurrence (HR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.8-1.9, P = .3) or poorer OS outcomes (HR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.6-1.4, P = .7) were observed in the RA group.

CONCLUSION

In uterine-confined endometrioid endometrial cancers, surgical staging using RA laparoscopy was not associated with adverse survival outcomes compared to conventional laparoscopy.

Laparoscopy with transverse-abdominal extra-fascial hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial carcinoma, obesity, and large uterus: A case report

RATIONALE

Removal of a large uterus poses a challenge in minimally invasive surgery for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. This manuscript presents 3 cases performed the improved surgical procedure with minimal trauma.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Three patients with obesity (Body Mass Index: 31.93, 30.06, and 51.82 kg/m2) and large uterus (7.3 × 8.0 × 7.6 cm, 8.5 × 8.9 × 8.5 cm, and 8.3 × 10.1 × 6.9 cm) visited our hospital because of vaginal bleeding, and received dilation and curettage. Pathological examination revealed endometrial carcinoma.

DIAGNOSES

Endometrial carcinoma, obesity.

INTERVENTION

Laparoscopy and transverse-abdominal extra-fascial hysterectomy were performed. First, we performed bilateral adnexectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, and para-aortic lymph node sampling, and exposed and separated the para-uterine tissue and bladder before cutting off the uterus from the vagina through laparoscopy. Second, we made a 10 cm suprapubic transverse incision in the lower abdomen, clamped the vagina using right-angle forceps to follow the principle of tumor-free technique, placed the uterus in a surgical bag for retrieval the uterus immediately from the incision.

OUTCOME

All 3 patients underwent intestinal recovery for 24 hours post operation; 50 mL blood was lost during the operation with a well-healing wound and no complication. Till date, there has been no recurrence or metastasis in any of them.

LESSONS

Improving the surgical procedure could enhance safety and ease of operation even in cases of obesity and a large uterus.

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in obese patients

BACKGROUND

Although robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) has a lower conversion rate to open surgery and causes less blood loss than laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), clear evidence on the impact of the surgical approach on morbidity is lacking. Prior studies have shown a higher rate of complications among obese patients undergoing pancreatectomy. The primary aim of this study is to compare short-term outcomes of RDP vs. LDP in patients with a BMI ≥ 30.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, all obese patients who underwent RDP or LDP for any indication between 2012 and 2022 at 18 international expert centers were included. The baseline characteristics underwent inverse probability treatment weighting to minimize allocation bias.

RESULTS

Of 446 patients, 219 (50.2%) patients underwent RDP. The median age was 60 years, the median BMI was 33 (31-36), and the preoperative diagnosis was ductal adenocarcinoma in 21% of cases. The conversion rate was 19.9%, the overall complication rate was 57.8%, and the 90-day mortality rate was 0.7% (3 patients). RDP was associated with a lower complication rate (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.89; p = 0.005), less blood loss (150 vs. 200 ml; p < 0.001), fewer blood transfusion requirements (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.50; p < 0.001) and a lower Comprehensive Complications Index (8.7 vs. 8.9, p < 0.001) than LPD. RPD had a lower conversion rate (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19-0.39; p < 0.001) and achieved better spleen preservation rate (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.13-3.39; p = 0.016) than LPD.

CONCLUSIONS

In obese patients, RDP is associated with a lower conversion rate, fewer complications and better short-term outcomes than LPD.

Hysteroscopic endometrial tumor localization and sentinel lymph node mapping. An upgrade of the hysteroscopic role in endometrial cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Given the growing interest in sentinel node mapping (SLN) biopsy in Endometrial Cancer (EC) patients, many efforts have been made to maximize the SLN bilateral detection rate. However, at present, no previous research assessed the potential correlation between primary EC location in the uterine cavity and SLN mapping. In this context, this study aims to investigate the possible role of intrauterine EC hysteroscopic localization in predicting SLN nodal placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EC patients surgically treated from January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and SLN mapping. During hysteroscopy, the location of the neoplastic lesion was described as follows: uterine fundus (comprising the most cranial portion of the uterine cavity up to the tubal ostium including the cornual areas), corpus uteri (from the tubal ostium to the inner uterine orifice), and diffuse (when the tumor invades more than 50% of the uterine cavity).

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety patients met the inclusion criteria. The tumor pattern diffused to the whole uterine cavity was statistically associated with SLN uptake on common iliac lymph nodes (OR 2.4, 95%CI 1-5.8, p = 0.05). Patients'age is an independent factor associated with SLN failure (OR: 0.95, 95%CI 0.93-0.98, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed a statistically significant association between EC hysteroscopically spread throughout the whole uterine cavity and SLN uptake at the common iliac lymph nodes. Furthermore, patient age negatively affected the SLN detection rate.

Factors associated with conversion in laparoscopic surgery in a low-resource setting: a single-center prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopy has a clear patient benefit related to postoperative morbidity but may not be as commonly performed in low-and middle-income countries. The decision to convert to laparotomy can be complex and involve factors related to the surgeon, patient, and procedure. The objective of this work is to analyze the factors associated with conversion in laparoscopic surgery in a low-resource setting.

METHODS

This is a single-center prospective study of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery between May 1, 2018 and October 31, 2021. The parameters studied were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), intraoperative complication (e.g., accidental enterotomy, hemorrhage), equipment malfunction (e.g., technical failure of the equipment, break in CO2 supply line), operating time, and conversion rate.

RESULTS

A total of 123 laparoscopic surgeries were performed. The average age of patients was 31.2 years (range 11-75). The procedures performed included appendix procedures (48%), followed by gynecological (18.7%), gallbladder (14.6%), digestive (10.56%), and abdominal procedures (4%). The average length of hospitalization was 3 days (range 1-16). Conversion to laparotomy was reported in 8.9% (n = 11) cases. Equipment malfunction was encountered in 9.8% (n = 12) cases. Surgical complications were noted in 11 cases (8.9%). Risk factors for conversion were shown to be BMI > 25 kg/m2 (OR 4.6; p = 0.034), intraoperative complications (OR 12.6; p = 0.028), and equipment malfunction (OR 9.4; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

A better understanding of the underlying factors associated with high conversion rates, such as overweight/obesity, intraoperative complications, and equipment failure, is the first step toward surgical planning to reduce postoperative morbidity in low-resource settings.

Impact of Patient Body Mass Index on Post-Operative Recovery from Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy

A longitudinal, descriptive, prospective, and prolective study of individuals with endometrial or cervical cancer/pre-cancer diagnoses and high BMI (over 35 kg/m2) undergoing RH was conducted. Of the 53 participants recruited, 3 (6%) were converted to open surgery. The 50 RH participants had median BMI 42 kg/m2 (range 35 to 60): the range 35-39.9 kg/m2 had 17 cases; the range 40-44.9 kg/m2 had 15 cases; 45-49.9 kg/m2 8 cases; and those ≥50 kg/m2 comprised 10 cases. The mean RH operating time was 128.1 min (SD 25.3) and the median length of hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-14 days). Increased BMI was associated with small, but statistically significant, increases in operating time and anaesthetic time, 65 additional seconds and 37 seconds, respectively, for each unit increase in BMI. The median self-reported time for individuals who underwent RH to return to their pre-operative activity levels was 4 weeks (range 2 to >12 weeks). There was a significant improvement in pain and physical independence scores over time (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and no significant difference in scores for overall QOL, pain, or physical independence scores was found between the BMI groups. Patient-reported recovery and quality of life following RH is high in individuals with high BMI (over 35 kg/m2) and does not appear to be impacted by the severity of obesity.

Endometrial Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/034-OL, September 2022) - Part 2 with Recommendations on the Therapy of Precancerous Lesions and Early-stage Endometrial Cancer, Surgical Therapy, Radiotherapy and Drug-based Therapy, Follow-up Care, Recurrence and Metastases, Psycho-oncological Care, Palliative Care, Patient Education, and Rehabilitative and Physiotherapeutic Care

Summary The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer, first published in April 2018, was reviewed in its entirety between April 2020 and January 2022 and updated. The review was carried out at the request of German Cancer Aid as part of the Oncology Guidelines Program and the lead coordinators were the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Gynecology Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG) and the German Cancer Aid (DKH). The guideline update was based on a systematic search and assessment of the literature published between 2016 and 2020. All statements, recommendations and background texts were reviewed and either confirmed or amended. New statements and recommendations were included where necessary. Aim The use of evidence-based risk-adapted therapies to treat low-risk women with endometrial cancer prevents unnecessarily radical surgery and avoids non-beneficial adjuvant radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. For women with endometrial cancer and a high risk of recurrence, the guideline defines the optimum level of radical surgery and indicates whether chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiation therapy is necessary. This should improve the survival rates and quality of life of these patients. The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer and the quality indicators based on the guideline aim to provide the basis for the work of certified gynecological cancer centers. Methods The guideline was first compiled in 2018 in accordance with the requirements for S3-level guidelines and was updated in 2022. The update included an adaptation of the source guidelines identified using the German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal (DELBI). The update also used evidence reviews which were created based on selected literature obtained from systematic searches in selected literature databases using the PICO process. The Clinical Guidelines Service Group was tasked with carrying out a systematic search and assessment of the literature. Their results were used by interdisciplinary working groups as a basis for developing suggestions for recommendations and statements which were then modified during structured online consensus conferences and/or additionally amended online using the DELPHI process to achieve a consensus. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline provides recommendations on the treatment of precancerous lesions and early-stage endometrial cancer, surgical treatment, radiotherapy and drug-based therapy, follow-up, recurrence, and metastasis of endometrial cancer as well as the state of psycho-oncological care, palliative care, patient education, rehabilitative and physiotherapeutic care.

Adverse Fetal Outcomes and Maternal Mortality Following Nonobstetric Abdominopelvic Surgery in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the absolute risks of adverse fetal outcomes and maternal mortality following nonobstetric abdominopelvic surgery in pregnancy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Surgery is often necessary in pregnancy, but absolute measures of risk required to guide perioperative management are lacking.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EvidenceBased Medicine Reviews from January 1, 2000, to December 9, 2020, for observational studies and randomized trials of pregnant patients undergoing nonobstetric abdominopelvic surgery. We determined the pooled proportions of fetal loss, preterm birth, and maternal mortality using a generalized linear random/mixed effects model with a logit link.

RESULTS

We identified 114 observational studies (52 [46%] appendectomy, 34 [30%] adnexal, 8 [7%] cholecystectomy, 20 [17%] mixed types) reporting on 67,111 pregnant patients. Overall pooled proportions of fetal loss, preterm birth, and maternal mortality were 2.8% (95% CI 2.2-3.6), 9.7% (95% CI 8.3-11.4), and 0.04% (95% CI 0.02-0.09; 4/10,000), respectively. Rates of fetal loss and preterm birth were higher for pelvic inflammatory conditions (eg, appendectomy, adnexal torsion) than for abdominal or nonurgent conditions (eg, cholecystectomy, adnexal mass). Surgery in the second and third trimesters was associated with lower rates of fetal loss (0.1%) and higher rates of preterm birth (13.5%) than surgery in the first and second trimesters (fetal loss 2.9%, preterm birth 5.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Absolute risks of adverse fetal outcomes after nonobstetric abdom- inopelvic surgery vary with gestational age, indication, and acuity. Pooled estimates derived here identify high-risk clinical scenarios, and can inform implementation of mitigation strategies and improve preoperative counselling.

Recommandations pour la pratique clinique Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022–2023 : prise en charge du cancer de l'endomètre localisé

Recommendations for clinical practice, Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023: Management of localized endometrial cancer Endometrial cancer is the most frequent gynecological cancers in industrialized countries and its incidence increases. The newmolecularclassification allows determination of the risk of recurrence and helps orienting therapeutic management. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Minimally invasive approach must be preferred for stages I and II. Surgery includes hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy even in high risk diseases and omentectomy for non-endometrioid tumors (except in case of clear cells tumors). Fertility preservation can be proposed in low grade, stage I tumors without myometrial involvement. In stage III/IV disease, lymph node debulking without totallymphadenectomy is indicated. In case of peritoneal carcinomatosis, first-line cytoreductive surgery is recommended if complete resection can be achieved. Adjuvant therapy is not recommended in low risk tumors. In intermediate risk tumors, curietherapy is indicated. In tumors with high-intermediate risk, curietherapy and external radiotherapy are indicated according to prognostic factors (stage II, lymphovascular invasion); adjuvant chemotherapy can be considered on a case-by-case basis. In high risk tumors, chemotherapy and external radiotherapy are recommended using a concomitant or sequential approach.

Obesity and menstrual disorders

Obesity is a growing public health concern and is associated with a range of menstrual disorders, including heavy menstrual bleeding, oligomenorrhea, dysmenorrhea, and endometrial pathology. Investigations may be more logistically challenging in those in the population with obesity, and because of the heightened risk of endometrial malignancy, there should be a low threshold for biopsy to exclude endometrial hyperplasia. Although treatment modalities for women with obesity are broadly similar to those with a normal BMI, additional consideration must be given to the risks associated with estrogen in obesity. Outpatient management of heavy menstrual bleeding is a developing field and outpatient treatment modalities are preferable in the population with obesity to avoid the morbidity associated with anesthetics.

Multi-Institutional Trends in Gynecological Robotic Surgery in India: A Real-World Scenario

Background Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology has grown exponentially compared to laparoscopic surgery. The probable reasons for the increased uptake of robotics are a shorter learning curve, three-dimensional vision, and increased dexterity compared to laparoscopic surgery, and precise surgery as compared to open surgery. This study compares the time trends of various parameters in robotic gynecological surgery in India over a decade. Material and methods In India, a retrospective analysis of all robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic diseases in five tertiary care hospitals was conducted between July 2011 and June 2021. Data were collected regarding demographic profiles, clinical and disease characteristics, and indications for surgery. Details related to surgery were collected, such as the number of ports, console and docking time, the procedure performed, total operative time, average blood loss, blood transfusion, and length of hospital stay. All the parameters collected were grouped into five years, and a comparison was made between the first five years (2011-2015) and the second five years (2016-2021). Statistical analysis, including descriptive statistics and trend analysis, was performed. Results During the 10 years, the total number of cases included was 1,501, out of which 764 were benign cases and 737 were pre-malignant/malignant cases. The common indications were uterine leiomyoma (31.2%) and carcinoma endometrium (28%). The mean age for benign cases was significantly lower than that for malignant cases (40.84 years and 55.42 years, respectively). Mean blood loss was significantly lower for benign indications (97.48 mL) than for oncological surgery (184.67 mL) and needed fewer transfusions. The mean length of stay (LOS) for benign (2.07 days) and malignant/ pre-malignant cases (2.32 days) and the mean BMI for benign (28.40) and for oncological patients (28.47) were similar in both groups. The docking time reduced significantly in the last five years. Conclusion The current retrospective study demonstrates an increasing uptake of robotic technology in gynecological surgery in India. Of the total cohort of cases, 70.9% of patients underwent gynecological robotic surgery in the last five years. A burst of adaptability happened for malignant cases in 2017 and benign cases in 2018, probably due to the increased availability of robotic platforms and improved awareness of technology and training among medical professionals. The number of cases has grown exponentially over the last five years in both benign and malignant/ pre-malignant scenarios; however, there has been a downward trend in the robotic surgery performed in the previous couple of years due to the uncertainty of the COVID pandemic.

Risk Assessment Model for Complications in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study

Objective: To estimate the rate of intra-operative and postoperative complications, and to define the risk of 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > 2) according to the presence of one of 10 different variables of minimally invasive (MI) hysterectomy; and then to create a risk assessment model easily applicable in clinical practice. Methods: A single center single arm retrolective study. Data of consecutive patients who have undergone MI hysterectomy for gynaecologic disorders between May 2018 and April 2021 were analyzed. Perioperative surgical outcomes, occurrence of intra- and postoperative complications, and readmissions within 30 days from surgery were registered. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with major postoperative complications. Results: Over the study period, 445 patients were included in the study. The majority of patients developed a minor event, while major complications (grade III) were required in 14 patients. None of the patients showed a grade IV or V complication. Univariate analysis was performed on patients who had developed intra- or postoperative complications from those who did not experience complications. Body mass index (BMI) (p-value 0.045) and surgeon’s experience (p-value 0.015) were found to be associated with a different surgery time. Regarding major postoperative complications, a statistically significant association was found for the variables: BMI (p-value 0.006), previous abdominal surgery (p-value 0.015), and surgeon’s experience (p-value 0.035) in the univariate analysis. Also in the multivariate analysis, the risk of major postoperative complications was higher in these three different variables. BMI, previous surgery, and surgeon’s experience were inserted in a reproducible risk assessment model in order to stratify the risk of major postoperative complications. Conclusions: We proposed a risk assessment model including factors not previously considered in the literature: the standardization of the surgical technique, the surgeon’s experience, the best MI approach (laparoscopy or robot-assisted), and previous abdominal surgery are crucial tools to consider. Further prospective studies with a larger population sample are needed to validate these preliminary evaluations for patients undergoing MI hysterectomy.

Comparison between Laparoscopic and Robotic Approach for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Endometrial Carcinoma Women

Robotic surgery has been approved as an alternative to laparoscopy to improve surgical outcomes. There is neither a consensus nor a systematic assessment of the literature about the superiority of the robotic approach over the laparoscopic one for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in endometrial carcinoma (EC) women. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the laparoscopic and robotic approaches for SLN biopsy in EC patients. Five electronic databases were queried from their inception to May 2022 for peer-reviewed studies, comparing such approaches in SLN biopsy in EC patients. The rate of detected SLN, dissected SLN, intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion to laparotomy, number of dissected SLN, and SLN identification and dissection time were compared between the laparoscopic and robotic approaches for SLN biopsy in EC patients. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated when possible. Two studies with 660 EC women (364 who had undergone laparoscopy, and 296 who had robotic surgery) were included. No assessed outcome showed significant differences between the two approaches. In conclusion, the laparoscopic and robotic approaches for SLN biopsy in EC patients appeared to not differ, in terms of SLN detection, intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion to laparotomy, number of dissected SLN, and SLN identification and dissection time.

Long-Term Assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Reoperation Risk in Obese Women: Vaginal and Laparoscopic Approaches

The aim of this study was to compare reoperation risks after pelvic organ prolapse repair at 5-year follow-up between obese, overweight, and normal-weight women and to assess these risks accounting for the surgical procedure. We performed a retrospective chart review of all the women who underwent POP repair by transvaginal mesh surgery between January 2005 and January 2009 or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy between January 2003 and December 2013 at the Gynecologic Surgery Department of the Lille University Hospital. During the study period, 744 women who underwent POP repair were divided into three groups: 382 (51%), 240 (32%), and 122 (16%) in the nonobese group (BMI < 25 kg/m²), overweight group (25 kg/m² ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m²), and obese group (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²), respectively. The primary outcome was global reoperation. The median duration of follow-up was 87 months. The risks of global reoperation did not significantly differ between the three BMI groups (adjusted HR (95% CI): 1.12 (0.69 to 1.82) for overweight women and 0.90 (0.46 to 1.74) for obese women compared to normal-weight women, adjusted p = 0.80), nor among the women who underwent transvaginal mesh surgery or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The risks of reoperation for POP recurrence, stress urinary incontinence, or mesh-related complications did not significantly differ between the three BMI groups in the overall population nor accounting for the surgical procedure. In conclusion, obesity does not seem to be a risk factor of reoperation for POP recurrence, SUI, or mesh-related complications in the long term regardless of the surgical approach.

Enhanced Recovery after Uterine Corpus Cancer Surgery: A 10 Year Retrospective Cohort Study of Robotic Surgery in an NHS Cancer Centre

Simple Summary

Surgical and survival outcomes for uterine corpus cancer following the introduction of robotic surgery to Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust; a large volume United Kingdom teaching hospital and cancer centre. Introduction of the Da Vinci^TM robot was associated with enhanced recovery after surgery with low 30-day mortality (0.1%), low return to theatre (0.5%), a low use of blood transfusion and intensive care (1.8% & 7.2% respectively), low conversion to open surgery (0.5%) and a reduction in median length of stay, with comparable survival to published data, and a three to four fold increase in cases treated. This increased productivity was associated with a highly predicable patient pathway of care, for high-risk patients, with reduced demands on health services.

Abstract

Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust introduced robotic surgery for uterine corpus cancer in 2010 to support increased access to minimally invasive surgery, a central element of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. More than 1750 gynaecological oncology robotic procedures have now been performed at Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust. A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients undergoing surgery for uterine corpus cancer between the 1 January 2010 and the 31 December 2019 to evaluate its success. Data was extracted from the dedicated gynaecological oncology database and a detailed notes review performed. During this time; 952 patients received primary surgery for uterine corpus cancer; robotic: n = 734; open: n = 164; other minimally invasive surgery: n = 54. The introduction of the Da Vinci^TM robot to Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust was associated with an increase in the minimally invasive surgery rate. Prior to the introduction of robotic surgery in 2008 the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) rate was 33% for women with uterine corpus cancer undergoing full surgical staging. In 2019, 10 years after the start of the robotic surgery program 91.3% of women with uterine corpus cancer received robotic surgery. Overall the MIS rate increased from 33% in 2008 to 92.9% in 2019. Robotic surgery is associated with a low 30-day mortality (0.1%), low return to theatre (0.5%), a low use of blood transfusion and intensive care (1.8% & 7.2% respectively), low conversion to open surgery (0.5%) and a reduction in median length of stay from 6 days (in 2008) to 1 day, regardless of age/BMI. Robotic survival is consistent with published data. Introduction of the robotic program for the treatment of uterine cancer increased productivity and was associated with a highly predicable patient pathway of care, for high-risk patients, with reduced demands on health services. Future health care commissioning should further expand access to robotic surgery nationally for women with uterine corpus cancer.

Prognosis and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery on Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma: Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis

Objective

The prognosis and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery (LPS) and open surgery or robotic surgery (RS) on endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients were compared.

Methods

Data as of May 2021 were retrieved from databases like PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The study involved randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, or case-control studies for comparing the effects of LPS and open surgery or robotic surgery (RS) on EC treatment. The primary outcomes included duration of operation, blood loss, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate/disease-free survival (DFS) rate and 3-year overall survival (OS) rate.

Results

A total of 24 studies were involved, and all of them were cohort studies except 1 RCT and 1 case-control study. There was no significant difference in duration of operation between LPS and open surgery (MD = −0.06, 95% CI: -0.37 to 0.25) or RS (MD = −0.15, 95% CI: -1.27 to 0.96). In comparison with the open surgery, LPS remarkably reduced blood loss (MD = −0.43, 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.29), LOS (MD = −0.71, 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.50), and the complication occurrence rate (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.95). However, LPS and RS saw no difference in blood loss (MD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.77 to 0.79). Besides, in comparison with RS, LPS prominently shortened the LOS (MD = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.40) but increased the complication occurrence rate (RR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.57 to 1.92). In contrast to open surgery or RS, LPS saw no difference in occurrence rate (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.01; RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.53), 3-year PFS/DFS (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.09; RR = 1.30, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.96), and 3-year OS (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.04; RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.60).

Conclusion

In sum, LPS was better than open surgery, which manifested in the aspects of less blood loss, shorter LOS, and fewer complications. LPS, therefore, was the most suitable option for EC patients. Nevertheless, LPS had no advantage over RS, and sufficient prospective RCTs are needed to further confirm its strengths.

New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer

Objective: The ideal management of early-stage cervical cancer has become the subject of a global controversy following the publication of a prospective study in 2018 that reported a worse oncologic outcome when comparing the minimally invasive approach to the laparotomy approach. The discussion involves both prospective and retrospective data and general and theoretical considerations. We wanted to look at the data available today and review the different opinions, offering an impartial assessment of the ongoing controversy. Methods: The available literature was reviewed, focusing on articles arguing for and against minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer. We tried to avoid any fundamental bias, as is often evident in the available reviews on the subject. Literature both before and after the 2018 publication was taken into consideration. Results: As is usual in discussions of concepts, the literature that is now available provides arguments for both sides of this challenging issue, depending on one’s standpoint. Science-related writing is not immune to trends. There is a curious shift in opinion seen before and after 2018. One must question whether there was a prejudice in favor of minimally invasive surgery prior to the publication of the NEJM articles and a bias against it afterward. Conclusion: Whether further minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer is invariable is tied to the more pressing question of how this surgery will have to be centralized in the future. Unless these questions are linked, no satisfactory solution can be found.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for early-stage endometrial cancer with massive uterine leiomyomas: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robot-assisted surgery enables precise operation, with the aid of high-resolution 3D images and articulated forceps, even in cases where the uterus is very large.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 48-year-old woman with severe obesity was referred to our hospital with atypical genital bleeding for half a year. She was diagnosed with multiple uterine leiomyomas and early endometrial cancer with presumed advanced stage classification (stage IA). Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and pelvic lymph node biopsy were performed. Due to the difficulty of removing the uterus transvaginally, the umbilical incision was extended by 7 cm, which allowed the uterine tissue removal without shredding or leakage into the pelvic cavity. The patient was discharged 5 days postoperatively, with no postoperative complications.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Robot-assisted surgery has often been used for the management of early-stage endometrial cancer. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy has significantly fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications than laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

Improving this surgical procedure allows for safe and easy robot-assisted uterine malignant tumor removal even in cases where the patient presents with severe obesity and huge uterine leiomyomas.

The effect of steep head-down tilt on respiratory status in endometrial cancer patients with obesity during robot-assisted hysterectomy

•

Robot-assisted surgery with a head-down tilt of 25° or below may be safe even in patients with morbid obesity.

•

In patients with morbid obesity, a steep head-down tilt may present a risk of respiratory complications.

•

A Trendelenburg position of 20–25° is adequate to perform robot-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of head-down tilt on airway pressure in gynecologic patients with obesity during robot-assisted hysterectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 27 patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m² who underwent robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and endometrial atypical hyperplasia using the da Vinci Xi system. Mechanical ventilation was performed using pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). Surgery was performed at 20° (group A, n = 17) or 25° head-down tilt (group B, n = 10). Respiratory parameters, including positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), tidal volume (TV), mean airway pressure (P mean), and peak airway pressure (P peak), were measured before (T1) and after the head-down tilt at 1 h (T2) and 2 h (T3) during anesthesia.

Results

The median BMI was 37.5 (range 28–51) kg/m², with no between-group variation. Oxygenation was maintained intraoperatively for all patients. The expiratory carbon dioxide partial pressure was 43.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 42.2–45.0) mmHg. The P mean peak at T2 in group B was significantly higher than in group A (P < 0.011); however, other parameters at T2 and T3 did not differ significantly between the groups. Patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m² had significantly higher respiratory parameters than those with BMI < 40 kg/m². In patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m², the mean P means and P peaks at T3 were 17.3 cmH₂O (95% CI 16.3–18.3) and 29.4 cmH₂O (95% CI 27.1–31.7), respectively.

Discussion

With careful anesthetic management during PCV, robot-assisted surgery with a head-down tilt of 25° or below may be safe, even in patients with class III obesity.

Robot-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Different Classes of Obesity: A Cohort Study

Background and Objectives:

Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy is a safe and feasible approach in patients with higher body mass index (BMI). Slightly longer operating time in patients with high BMI did not result in higher complication or conversion rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy is a feasible and safe surgical approach in different classes of obesity.

Methods:

A single center retrospective cohort study was performed in a large secondary teaching hospital in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy between January 1, 2011 and January 31, 2019 were included.

Results:

Data regarding patient characteristics, complication rate, conversion rate, skin-to-skin time, robot console time, and operating room time were collected. Surgery specific data were compared in patients with several classes of obesity. In total 356 cases were included. Median BMI was 29 kg/m² (range 18 – 59). Complication rate and conversion to laparotomy did not differ significantly in different classes of obesity. Robot console time and skin-to-skin time was significantly longer in women with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m² (n = 34) compared to patients with normal BMI.

Conclusion:

Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy is a safe and feasible approach in women in different classes of obesity. The significantly prolonged operating time does not result in higher complication or conversion rates.

Initiation and feasibility of a multi-specialty minimally invasive surgical programme using a novel robotic system: A case series

INTRODUCTION

There are a number of small case series examining new robotic surgical systems, but this is the first large case series assessing the feasibility of the Versius® system from CMR Surgical (1 Evolution Business Park, Cambridge, UK) in a multi-specialty setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients undergoing Versius®-assisted surgery in a previously robot-naïve centre were consented for collection of data on demographics, pre-, intra-, and postoperative outcomes. Data collection was performed prospectively from the start of the robotic surgical programme.

RESULTS

160 operations were performed over a 19-month period, including 68 colorectal, 60 gynaecology, and 32 general surgery cases. The conversion rate to open surgery was 4.4% for colorectal, and 0% for gynaecology and general surgery. Median length of stay was 6 days for colorectal, 1 day for gynaecology, and 0 days for general surgery. Other outcomes were comparable to existing literature for robotic assisted surgery.

CONCLUSION

The Versius® system is safe and feasible for use in a multi-specialty minimally invasive surgery programme, including colorectal, general surgical & gynaecological cases, and operative volume can be safely and easily scaled up in a district general hospital setting without prior robotic surgical experience.

European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care.

OBJECTIVE

In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.

Long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) has been proposed as an alternative to laparoscopic (TLH) and abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), particularly for women with medical comorbidities. We examined the use and long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for women with early-stage endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify women with stage I-II endometrial cancer treated with primary hysterectomy from 2000 to 2015. Multivariable regression models were developed to examine clinical, demographic, and pathologic factors associated with performance of TVH. The association between route of hysterectomy and cancer-specific and overall survival was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

A total of 19,212 patients including 837 (4.6%) who underwent TVH were identified. Performance of TVH declined from 4.5% in 2000 to 2.2% in 2015 (P < 0.0001). Compared to patients 65-69 years of age, patients 75-79 years old (aRR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.19-1.79) and those >80 years old (aRR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.30-1.97) were more likely to undergo TVH. Women with high grade tumors were less likely to undergo TVH. Five-year overall and cancer specific survivals were similar for TAH, TLH, and TVH. In multivariable models, there was no association between TVH and either cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65-1.22) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy.

CONCLUSION

Use of TVH for stage I and II endometrial cancer has decreased in the U.S. Chronologic age is the greatest predictor of performance of TVH. Performance of TVH does not negatively impact survival for women with early-stage endometrial cancer.