1
|
Ausania F, Landi F, González-Abós C, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Walsh M, Hossain SM, White S, Prabakaran V, Melstrom LG, Fong Y, Valle V, Bing Y, Xiu D, Di Franco G, De' Angelis N, Laurent A, Giuliani G, Pernazza G, Memeo R, Rios J, Coratti A, Morelli L, Giulianotti PC. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in obese patients. Int J Med Robot 2023:e2596. [PMID: 37937476 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is associated with a lower conversion rate and less blood loss than laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). LDP has similar oncological outcomes as open surgery in PDAC. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes in obese patients with RDP versus LDP for PDAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospectively, all obese patients who underwent RDP or LDP for PDAC between 2012 and 2022 at 12 international expert centres were included. RESULTS out of 372, 81 patients were included. All baseline features were comparable between the two groups. RDP was associated with decreased blood loss (495mlLDP vs. 188mlRDP; p = 0.003), lower conversion rate (13.5%RDP vs. 36.4%LDP; p = 0.019) and lower rate of Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications (13.5%RDP vs. 36.4%LDP; p = 0.019). Overall and disease-free survival were comparable. CONCLUSIONS In obese patients with left-sided PDAC, the robotic approach was associated with improved intraoperative outcomes and fewer severe complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Ausania
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Filippo Landi
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carolina González-Abós
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - John B Martinie
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew Walsh
- HPB Surgery Department, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Shanaz M Hossain
- HPB Surgery Department, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Laleh G Melstrom
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Disease Team, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Disease Team, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Valentina Valle
- Department of Surgery, Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Yuntao Bing
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dianrong Xiu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gregorio Di Franco
- Division of Translational and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, General Surgery Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Nicola De' Angelis
- Department of Digestive, HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, Creteil, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive, HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, Creteil, France
| | - Giuseppe Giuliani
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Graziano Pernazza
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Surgery, Acquaviva delle Fonti Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - José Rios
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Clinic and Medical Statistics Core Facility, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- Division of Translational and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, General Surgery Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pier C Giulianotti
- Department of Surgery, Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ausania F, Landi F, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Walsh M, Hossain SM, White S, Prabakaran V, Melstrom LG, Fong Y, Butturini G, Bignotto L, Valle V, Bing Y, Xiu D, Di Franco G, Sanchez-Bueno F, de'Angelis N, Laurent A, Giuliani G, Pernazza G, Esposito A, Salvia R, Bazzocchi F, Esposito L, Pietrabissa A, Pugliese L, Memeo R, Uyama I, Uchida Y, Rios J, Coratti A, Morelli L, Giulianotti PC. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in obese patients. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8384-8393. [PMID: 37715084 PMCID: PMC10615948 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10361-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) has a lower conversion rate to open surgery and causes less blood loss than laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), clear evidence on the impact of the surgical approach on morbidity is lacking. Prior studies have shown a higher rate of complications among obese patients undergoing pancreatectomy. The primary aim of this study is to compare short-term outcomes of RDP vs. LDP in patients with a BMI ≥ 30. METHODS In this multicenter study, all obese patients who underwent RDP or LDP for any indication between 2012 and 2022 at 18 international expert centers were included. The baseline characteristics underwent inverse probability treatment weighting to minimize allocation bias. RESULTS Of 446 patients, 219 (50.2%) patients underwent RDP. The median age was 60 years, the median BMI was 33 (31-36), and the preoperative diagnosis was ductal adenocarcinoma in 21% of cases. The conversion rate was 19.9%, the overall complication rate was 57.8%, and the 90-day mortality rate was 0.7% (3 patients). RDP was associated with a lower complication rate (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.89; p = 0.005), less blood loss (150 vs. 200 ml; p < 0.001), fewer blood transfusion requirements (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.50; p < 0.001) and a lower Comprehensive Complications Index (8.7 vs. 8.9, p < 0.001) than LPD. RPD had a lower conversion rate (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19-0.39; p < 0.001) and achieved better spleen preservation rate (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.13-3.39; p = 0.016) than LPD. CONCLUSIONS In obese patients, RDP is associated with a lower conversion rate, fewer complications and better short-term outcomes than LPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Ausania
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), C. Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Filippo Landi
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona (UB), C. Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
- Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - John B Martinie
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Matthew Walsh
- HPB Surgery Department, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Shanaz M Hossain
- HPB Surgery Department, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Laleh G Melstrom
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Disease Team, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yuman Fong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Disease Team, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Department of HBP Surgery, P. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Laura Bignotto
- Department of HBP Surgery, P. Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Valentina Valle
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Yuntao Bing
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dianrong Xiu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gregorio Di Franco
- Division of Translational and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, General Surgery Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Department of Digestive, HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, Creteil, France
| | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive, HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, Creteil, France
| | - Giuseppe Giuliani
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Graziano Pernazza
- General and Robotic Surgery Department, San Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Salvia
- HBP Surgery Department, Policlinico G.B. Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Bazzocchi
- Department of HBP Surgery, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | - Ludovica Esposito
- Department of HBP Surgery, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Pugliese
- Department of HBP Surgery, Policlinico S. Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Surgery, Acquaviva delle Fonti Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Uchida
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - José Rios
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Hospital Clinic and Medical Statistics Core Facility, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- Division of Translational and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, General Surgery Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pier C Giulianotti
- Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ammar K, Varghese C, K T, Prabakaran V, Robinson S, Pathak S, Dasari BVM, Pandanaboyana S. P-P03 Impact of routine nasogastric decompression versus no nasogastric decompression after pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes: A meta-analysis of available evidence. Br J Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab430.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This meta-analysis reviewed the current evidence on the impact of routine Nasogastric decompression (NGD) versus no NGD after pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes.
Methods
PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting the role of nasogastric tube decompression after pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes were retrieved and analysed up to January 2021.
Results
Eight studies with total of 1301 patients were enrolled of which 668 patients had routine NGD. Routine NGD was associated with a higher incidence of overall delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and clinically relevant DGE (OR = 2.51, 95% CI; 1.12 - 5.63, I2= 83%, P = 0.03, and OR = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.83 – 7.25, I2 = 54%, P < 0.01, respectively). Routine NGD was also associated with a higher rate of Clavien-Dindo ≥ 2 complications (OR = 3.12, 95% CI: 1.05 – 9.28, I2 = 88%, P = 0.04), and increased length of hospital stay (MD = 2.67, 95% CI: 0.60 – 4.75, I2 = 97%, P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in overall complications (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.79 – 1.46, I2 0%, P = 0.66), or postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.86 – 1.72, I2 = 0%, P = 0.28) between the two groups.
Conclusions
Routine NGD may be associated with increased rates of DGE, major complications and longer length of stay after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Ammar
- HPB and Transplant surgery department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Thejasvin K
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | - Stuart Robinson
- HPB and Transplant surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Samir Pathak
- HPB surgery, St James Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby VM Dasari
- HPB and Transplant surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hosptial, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- HPB and Transplant surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ammar K, Varghese C, K T, Prabakaran V, Robinson S, Pathak S, Dasari BVM, Pandanaboyana S. Impact of routine nasogastric decompression versus no nasogastric decompression after pancreaticoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2021; 5:6472792. [PMID: 34932101 PMCID: PMC8691053 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Consensus on the use of nasogastric decompression (NGD) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is lacking. This meta-analysis reviewed current evidence on the impact of routine NGD versus no NGD after PD on perioperative outcomes. Methods PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting on the role of NGD after PD on perioperative outcomes. Data up to January 2021were retrieved and analysed. Results Eight studies were included, with a total of 1301 patients enrolled, of whom 668 had routine NGD. Routine NGD was associated with a higher incidence of overall delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (odds ratio (OR) 2.51, 95 per cent c.i. 1.12 to 5.63, I2 = 83 per cent; P = 0.03) and clinically relevant DGE (OR 3.64, 95 per cent c.i. 1.83 to 7.25, I2 = 54 per cent; P < 0.01), a higher rate of Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher complications (OR 3.12, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 9.28, I2 = 88 per cent; P = 0.04) and increased length of hospital stay (mean difference 2.67, 95 per cent c.i. 0.60 to 4.75, I2 = 97 per cent; P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in overall complications (OR 1.07, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 1.46, I2 = 0 per cent; P = 0.66) or postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 1.21, 95 per cent c.i. 0.86 to 1.72, I2 = 0 per cent; P = 0.28) between patients with or those without routine NGD. Conclusion Routine NGD was associated with increased rates of DGE, major complications and longer length of stay after PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Ammar
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Egypt
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Thejasvin K
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Viswakumar Prabakaran
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stuart Robinson
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Samir Pathak
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, St James Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kathirvel M, Prabakaran V, Jayarajan J, Sivakumar A, Govindan V. Risk factors for the diabetic foot infection with multidrug-resistant microorganisms in South India. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Background: To analyse the risk-factors contributing to infection with multidrug-resistant organisms.Methods: 150 diabetic patients with foot ulcer were prospectively studied. Detailed clinical history and clinical examination of the ulcer were done for all patients. The microbiological profile was analyzed for each patient. Using internationally accepted criteria, the multidrug-resistant organisms were identified. Risk factors for acquiring MDRO infection were identified using appropriate statistical tools.Results: MDRO were isolated from 99 patients of 150 (66%). 54.8% (153 out of 279) of isolated organisms were multidrug-resistant organisms. By univariate analysis poor glycaemic control, previous hospitalisation, previous history of amputation, previous antibiotic usage, size of the ulcer, necrotic ulcer, recurrent ulcers, higher grade of ulcer, the presence of osteomyelitis, the presence of retinopathy, peripheral vascular disease, neuropathy and polymicrobial culture, were significantly associated with MDRO infected foot ulcers. Analysis by logistic regression indicated that only two factors significantly increased the risk of acquiring MDRO infection. They are recurrent ulcer (OR = 3.39, p <0.05, 95% CI = 1.081-10.664) and higher grade of ulcer (OR = 13.44, p <0.001, 95 % CI =3.595-50.278).Conclusions: The prevalence of MDRO is alarmingly high in infected diabetic foot ulcers. Recurrent ulcers and higher grade of ulcers are more prone to acquire MDROs.
Collapse
|