Sentinel lymph node biopsy for vulvar melanoma: trends in tumor stage-specific utilization

Temporal trends of failure-to-rescue following perioperative complications in vulvar cancer surgery in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Failure-to-rescue, defined as mortality following a perioperative complication, is a perioperative quality indicator studied in various surgeries, but not in vulvar cancer surgery. The objective of this study was to assess failure-to-rescue in patients undergoing surgical therapy for vulvar cancer.

METHODS

This cross-section study queried the National Inpatient Sample. The study population was 31,077 patients who had surgical therapy for vulvar cancer from 1/2001-9/2015. The main outcomes were (i) perioperative morbidity (29 indicators) and (ii) mortality following a perioperative complication during the index admission for vulvar surgery (failure-to-rescue), assessed with a multivariable binary logistic regression model.

RESULTS

The cohort-level median age was 69 years, and 14,337 (46.1%) had medical comorbidity. Perioperative complications were reported in 4736 (15.2%) patients during the hospital admission for vulvar surgery. In multivariable analysis, patient factors including older age, medical comorbidity, and morbid obesity, and treatment factors with prior radiotherapy and radical vulvectomy were associated with perioperative complications (P < 0.05). The number of patients with morbid obesity, higher comorbidity index, and prior radiotherapy increased over time (P-trends < 0.001). Among 4736 patients who developed perioperative complications, 55 patients died during the hospital admission for vulvar surgery (failure-to-rescue rate, 1.2%). In multivariable analysis, cardiac arrest (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] 27.25), sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (aOR 11.54), pneumonia (aOR 6.03), shock (aOR 4.37), and respiratory failure (aOR 3.10) were associated with failure-to-rescue (high-risk morbidities). There was an increasing trend of high-risk morbidities from 2.0% to 3.7% over time, but the failure-to-rescue from high-risk morbidities decreased from 9.1% to 2.8% (P-trend < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Vulvar cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment had increased comorbidity over time with an increase in high-risk complications. However, failure-to-rescue rate has decreased significantly.

Role of immunotherapy for lymph node positive vulvar melanoma: utilization and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utilization and outcomes of adjuvant immunotherapy for patients with vulvar melanoma and inguinal lymph node metastases.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients with vulvar melanoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 who did not have distant metastases, underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, had positive lymph nodes, and at least 1 month of follow-up were identified. Administration of immunotherapy was evaluated and clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Median overall survival was compared with the log-rank test. Stratified analysis based on clinical status of lymph nodes was performed. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were identified; the rate of immunotherapy use was 25% (75 patients). Patients who received immunotherapy were younger (median 58 vs 70 years, p<0.001); however, the two groups were comparable in terms of clinical lymph node status, rate of positive tumor margins, presence of tumor ulceration, tumor size, Breslow thickness, and performance of comprehensive lymphadenectomy. There was no overall survival difference between patients who did (median 31.08 months) and did not (median 22.77 months) receive immunotherapy (p=0.18). Following stratification by clinical lymph node status, immunotherapy did not improve overall survival of patients with clinically negative (median 35.35 vs 33.22, p=0.75) or positive lymph nodes (median 23.33 vs 16.99, p=0.64). After controlling for confounders, administration of immunotherapy was not associated with better overall survival (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study approximately one in four patients received adjuvant immunotherapy. Immunotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival.

Utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the early ovarian cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been incorporated into surgical care for many malignancies; however, the utility has not been examined in ovarian cancer. This study examined population-level trends, characteristics, and outcomes related to SLN biopsy in early stage ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study querying the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program from 2003-2018. The study population consisted of 11,512 women with stage I ovarian cancer who had adnexectomy-based surgical staging including lymph node evaluation. Exposure allocation was based on SLN biopsy use. Main outcomes measured were (i) trends and characteristics associated with SLN biopsy use, assessed by multivariable logistic regression model, and (ii) overall survival assessed with inverse provability of treatment weighting propensity score.

RESULTS

SLN biopsy was performed in less than 1% of study population. In a multivariable analysis, recent surgery (2011-2018 versus 2003-2010, odds ratio [OR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.59), smaller tumor size (< 10 versus ≥ 10 cm, OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.20-7.84), and East registry area (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.73-4.36) remained independent characteristics for SLN biopsy use. In a propensity score weighted model, 5-year overall survival rate was 90.5% for the SLN biopsy-incorporated group and 88.6% for the lymphadenectomy group (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.53-1.73).

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy was rarely performed for early ovarian cancer surgery during the study period with insufficient evidence to interpret the survival effect. SLN biopsy in early ovarian cancer appears to be in early development phase, warranting further study and careful evaluation to assess feasibility and oncologic outcome.