CAR-T Cell Therapy in Ovarian Cancer: Where Are We Now?

The success of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies in the treatment of hematologic malignancies has led to the investigation of their potential in the treatment of solid tumors, including ovarian cancer. While the immunosuppressive microenvironment of ovarian cancer has been a barrier in their implementation, several early phase clinical trials are currently evaluating CAR-T cell therapies targeting mesothelin, folate receptor a, HER2, MUC16, and B7H3. Ongoing challenges include cytokine-associated and "on-target, off-tumor" toxicities, while most common adverse events include cytokine release syndrome, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation-like syndrome (HLH/MAS), and neurotoxicity. In the present review, we summarize the current status of CAR-T therapy in ovarian cancer and discuss future directions.

Molecular landscape of ERBB2/HER2 gene amplification among patients with gynecologic malignancies; clinical implications and future directions

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the prevalence of ERBB2/HER2 gene amplification among patients with gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS

The American Association of Cancer Research (AACR) Genomics Evidence of Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) (version 13.1) database was accessed and patients with endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancer were identified. Patients with available data on the presence of copy-number gene alterations were selected for further analysis. Incidence of ERBB2 amplification following stratification by tumor site and histology was evaluated. Data from the OncoKB database, as provided by cBioPortal, was utilized to determine presence of pathogenic genomic alterations.

RESULTS

A total of 6961 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified: 49.1% with ovarian cancer, 45.2% with endometrial cancer and 5.7% with cervical cancer respectively. Overall incidence of ERBB2 amplification was 3.8%. Highest incidence of ERBB2 amplification was observed among patients with mucinous ovarian (14.4%), uterine serous (13.2%), uterine clear cell (9.4%), and uterine carcinosarcoma (7.9%). ERBB2 amplification was rare among patients with TP53 wild-type endometrioid endometrial cancer (0.4%). High incidence of mutations in genes of the PI3K pathway was observed among patients with ERBB2 amplified tumors.

CONCLUSION

ERBB2 amplification is frequently encountered among patients with uterine serous carcinoma, and mucinous ovarian carcinoma. In addition, a high incidence was also observed among those with uterine clear cell carcinoma, and uterine carcinosarcoma. For patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, incidence of ERBB2 amplification is low, especially in the absence of TP53 mutations.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the overall survival of patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the use and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II-IV low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma who underwent primary debulking surgery with known residual disease status and had at least 1 month of follow-up were identified in the National Cancer Database. Adjuvant chemotherapy was defined as receipt of chemotherapy within 6 months of surgery. Overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori-selected confounders. A systematic review of the literature was also performed.

RESULTS

In total, 618 patients with stage II-IV low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery were identified; 501 (81.1%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, while 117 (18.9%) patients did not. The median follow-up of the present cohort was 47.97 months. There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.78; 4-year overall survival rates were 77.5% and 76.1%, respectively). After controlling for patient age, medical co-morbidities, disease stage, and residual disease status, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with better overall survival (HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.38). Based on data from three retrospective studies, omission of adjuvant chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery was not associated with worse progression-free survival benefit (HR=1.25, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.95) for patients with stage III-V low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy may not be associated with an overall survival benefit for patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery.

Next generation sequencing reveals a high prevalence of pathogenic mutations in homologous recombination DNA damage repair genes among patients with uterine sarcoma

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the incidence of homologous recombination DNA damage response (HR-DDR) genomic alterations among patients with uterine sarcoma.

METHODS

The American Association for Cancer Research GENIE v13.0 database was accessed and patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma, adenosarcoma, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and endometrial stromal sarcoma not otherwise specified were identified. We determined the incidence of pathogenic alterations in the following genes involved in HR-DDR: ATM, ARID1A, ATRX, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRCA2, BRCA1, BRIP1, CHEK2, CHEK1, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, FANCE, FANCF, FANCG, FANCL, MRE11, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, WRN. Data from the OncoKB database, as provided by cBioPortal, was utilized to determine the presence of pathogenic genomic alterations.

RESULTS

A total of 509 patients contributing with 525 samples were identified. Median patient age at sample collection was 56 years while the majority were White (80.7%). The most common histologic subtype was leiomyosarcoma (63.8%) followed by adenosarcoma (12.3%). The overall incidence of HR-DDR genomic alterations was 28.2%. The most commonly altered genes were ATRX (18.2%), BRCA2 (4%), and RAD51B (2.6%). The highest incidence of HR-DDR genomic alterations was observed among patients with leiomyosarcoma (35.4%), adenosarcoma (27%) and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (30%), while those with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma had the lowest (2.9%) incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 3 patients with uterine sarcoma harbor a pathogenic alteration in HR-DDR genes. Incidence is high among patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma and adenosarcoma.

The spectrum of MAPK-ERK pathway genomic alterations in gynecologic malignancies: Opportunities for novel therapeutic approaches

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence of MAPK/ERK pathway genomic alterations among patients with gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS

We accessed the American Association of Cancer Research Genomics Evidence of Neoplasia Information Exchange publicly available dataset (v13.0). Patients with malignant tumors of the ovary, uterus, and cervix were identified. Following stratification by tumor site and histology, we examined the prevalence of MAPK/ERK pathway gene alterations (somatic mutation, and/or structural chromosome alterations). We included the following RAS-MAPK pathway genes known to be implicated in the dysregulation of the pathway; KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HRAS, MAP2K1, RAF1, PTPN11, NF1, and ARAF. Data from the OncoKB database, as provided by cBioPortal, were utilized to determine pathogenic gene alterations.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 10,233 patients with gynecologic malignancies; 48.2% (n = 4937) with ovarian, 45.2% (n = 4621) with uterine and 6.6% (n = 675) with cervical cancer respectively. The overall incidence of MAPK pathway gene alterations was 21%; the most commonly altered gene was KRAS (13%), followed by NF1 (7%), NRAS (1.3%), and BRAF (1.2%). The highest incidence was observed among patients with mucinous ovarian (71%), low-grade serous ovarian (48%), endometrioid ovarian (37%), and endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 5 patients with a gynecologic tumor harbor a MAPK/ERK pathway genomic alteration. Novel treatment strategies capitalizing on these alterations are warranted.

Role of immunotherapy for lymph node positive vulvar melanoma: utilization and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utilization and outcomes of adjuvant immunotherapy for patients with vulvar melanoma and inguinal lymph node metastases.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients with vulvar melanoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 who did not have distant metastases, underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, had positive lymph nodes, and at least 1 month of follow-up were identified. Administration of immunotherapy was evaluated and clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Median overall survival was compared with the log-rank test. Stratified analysis based on clinical status of lymph nodes was performed. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were identified; the rate of immunotherapy use was 25% (75 patients). Patients who received immunotherapy were younger (median 58 vs 70 years, p<0.001); however, the two groups were comparable in terms of clinical lymph node status, rate of positive tumor margins, presence of tumor ulceration, tumor size, Breslow thickness, and performance of comprehensive lymphadenectomy. There was no overall survival difference between patients who did (median 31.08 months) and did not (median 22.77 months) receive immunotherapy (p=0.18). Following stratification by clinical lymph node status, immunotherapy did not improve overall survival of patients with clinically negative (median 35.35 vs 33.22, p=0.75) or positive lymph nodes (median 23.33 vs 16.99, p=0.64). After controlling for confounders, administration of immunotherapy was not associated with better overall survival (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study approximately one in four patients received adjuvant immunotherapy. Immunotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival.

Controversies in the Staging of Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Approximately 10-25% of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer harbor metastases to the para-aortic lymph nodes. Staging of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer can be performed with imaging techniques, such as PET-CT; however, false negative rates can be as high as 20%, especially for patients with pelvic lymph node metastases. Surgical staging can identify patients with microscopic lymph nodes metastases and aid in accurate treatment planning with the administration of extended-field radiation therapy. Data from retrospective studies investigating the impact of para-aortic lymphadenectomy on the oncological outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer are mixed, while data from randomized controlled trials do not demonstrate a progression-free survival benefit. In the present review, we explore controversies in the staging of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and summarize the available literature.

Facility level variation in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with higher surgical morbidity for patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Investigate outcomes for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients based on facility-level utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

Stage III-IV EOC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Percentage of patients managed with NACT was calculated for facilities, reporting ≥120 patients. Facilities with lowest and highest quartile of NACT rate comprised the low and high-utilizing groups. Clinico-pathological characteristics were collected, and appropriate statistical analysis performed.

RESULTS

High- and low-utilizing facilities managed on average 54.1% and 25.4% of patients with NACT respectively. Patients managed at high-utilizing facilities were significantly more likely to be >65 (p = 0.029), have stage IV disease (p < 0.001) and comorbidities (p < 0.001). Patients managed with primary debulking surgery (PDS) at low-utilizing facilities were significantly more likely to be >65, have stage IV disease, and have comorbidities (all, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing PDS at low-utilizing facilities were significantly less likely to achieve complete gross resection (p < 0.001), and were significantly more likely to experience 90-day mortality (p < 0.001), and unplanned 30-day readmission (p < 0.001). After controlling for age, comorbidities, race, insurance status, stage, grade and histology, high-utilizing facilities trended towards better overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99). Overall, patients undergoing PDS had better OS compared to those who had NACT (median 42 vs 27 months, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite treating an EOC population with more advanced disease and comorbidities, high-utilizing facilities have lower surgical morbidity and mortality with no detrimental impact on long-term survival. Careful patient selection to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with PDS is pivotal.

Combination DNA Damage Response (DDR) Inhibitors to Overcome Drug Resistance in Ovarian Cancer

The DNA damage response (DDR) results in activation of a series of key target kinases that respond to different DNA damage insults. DDR inhibitors such as PARP inhibitors lead to the accumulation of DNA damage in tumor cells and ultimately apoptosis. However, responses to DDRi monotherapy in the clinic are not durable and resistance ultimately develops. DDRi-DDRi combinations such as PARPi-ATRi, PAPRi-WEE1i and PARPi-AsiDNA can overcome multiple resistance mechanisms to PARP inhibition. In addition, DDRi-DDRi combinations can provide viable treatment options for patients with platinum-resistant disease. In the present chapter we discuss rationale of DDRi-DDRi strategies that capitalize on genomic alterations found in ovarian cancer and other solid tumors and may provide in the near future new treatment options for these patients.

Addition of External Beam Radiation Therapy to Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Stage IIIC Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma: Utilization and Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate whether the addition of external beam radiation (EBRT) to adjuvant chemotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy is associated with better survival for patients with stage IIIC endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with apparent early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma, without a history of another tumor, who underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy and had positive lymph nodes were identified in the National Cancer Database. Those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (defined as receipt of treatment within 6 mo from surgery) and had at least 1 month of follow-up were selected for further analysis. Overall survival was compared between patients who did and did not receive EBRT within 6 months from surgery with the log-rank test. A Cox model was also constructed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 3116 patients were identified; 1458 (46.8%) received chemotherapy without and 1658 (53.2%) with EBRT. Pathologic characteristics (tumor grade, size, endocervical, and lymph-vascular invasion) were comparable between the two groups. Patients who received external beam radiation had better survival compared with those who did not, P =0.001; 5-year overall survival rates were 83.1% and 77.9%, respectively. After controlling for patient age, race, presence of comorbidities, insurance status, tumor size, grade and endocervical invasion, and the presence of lymph-vascular invasion, the addition of EBRT was associated with a survival benefit (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma metastatic to the lymph nodes, addition of external beam radiation to adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with a survival benefit.

Safety of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with FIGO stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utilization and outcomes of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed; patients aged ≤45 years diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2015 with FIGO stage I grade 2 or 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, who underwent hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and had at least 1 month of follow-up, were identified. Overall survival was assessed following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected variables.

RESULTS

A total of 2941 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified; 200 (6.8%) patients did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Rate of ovarian preservation was comparable between patients with grade 2 (n=163, 6.6%) and grade 3 (n=37, 7.7%) tumors (p=0.38). Patients who did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were younger (median 39 vs 41 years, p<0.001) and less likely to undergo surgical lymph node assessment (52% vs 76.2%, p<0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (p=0.94); 5 year overall survival rates were 96.6% and 97%, respectively. After controlling for confounders, including tumor grade, ovarian preservation was not associated with worse overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with grade 2 and 3 FIGO stage I endometrioid carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy, ovarian preservation is rarely performed while no clear detrimental effect on overall survival was found.

2022 Society of Gynecologic Oncology meeting report

The Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2022 Annual Meeting was held between 18-21 March in Phoenix, Arizona. Multiple scientific plenary sessions covered key research concepts that included novel therapeutics, precision oncology, clinical trials, cancer care delivery, diversity, equity and inclusion, surgical trials and translational research. In the present report presentations that may impact clinical care are summarized.

Oncologic outcomes of surgical para-aortic lymph node staging in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma undergoing chemoradiation

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the utilization and impact of surgical para-aortic lymph node staging on the survival of patients with locally advanced stage cervical carcinoma receiving definitive chemoradiation.

METHODS

We identified patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2015 with locally advanced (FIGO 2009 stage IB2-IVA) cervical carcinoma who did not undergo hysterectomy, received primary chemoradiation and had at least 1 month of follow-up. Two groups of patients were formed based on the assessment method of para-aortic lymph node status - radiologic assessment only versus surgical lymphadenectomy. Overall survival was compared with the log-rank test after Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected confounders.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 3540 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Para-aortic staging was performed in 333 (9.4%) patients. These patients were younger (median age 46 vs 52 years, p<0.001), less likely to have co-morbidities (8.7% vs 15.6%, p<0.001), more likely to have private insurance (48.9% vs 37.8%, p<0.001) and receive brachytherapy (76.9% vs 70.9%, p=0.022). The rate of para-aortic lymphadenectomy was comparable between patients with stage IB2-II and III-IVA disease (9.4% for both groups, p=0.98). Patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy were also more likely to have lymph nodes categorized as positive compared with those who had imaging only (27.3% vs 13.2%, p<0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who underwent radiologic only or surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment (p=0.80 from log-rank test); 4 year overall survival rates were 62.9% and 63%. After controlling for confounders, performance of para-aortic lymphadenectomy was not associated with a survival benefit (HR 1.07, 95% CIs: 0.88 to 1.31).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients with locally advanced stage cervical carcinoma, para-aortic lymphadenectomy was rarely performed and not associated with a survival benefit.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma with lymph-vascular invasion

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate if addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to radiation therapy improves overall survival in patients with high-intermediate risk stage I endometrial carcinoma with lymphovascular invasion.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2015 with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma with lymphovascular invasion who underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy and met the GOG-99 criteria for high-intermediate risk were identified in the National Cancer Database. Patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (administered within 6 months of surgery) and had at least 1 month of follow-up were selected for further analysis. Overall survival was compared with the log-rank test following stratification by type of radiation treatment. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 2881 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified; 2417 (83.9%) patients received radiation therapy alone while 464 (16.1%) received chemoradiation. Rate of adjuvant chemotherapy administration was comparable between patients who received vaginal brachytherapy alone (16.2%), and external beam radiation therapy (with or without vaginal brachytherapy) (15.8%), p=0.78. Rate of chemoradiation was higher for patients with grade 3 (28.8%) tumors compared with those with grade 2 (9.9%) and grade 1 (8.3%) tumors, p<0.001. After controlling for confounders for patients receiving external beam radiation, addition of chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.46). For patients receiving vaginal brachytherapy addition of chemotherapy was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.644, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.92). Benefit was limited to patients with grade 3 tumors, p=0.026; 4-year overall survival rate was 81.1% versus 74.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with high-intermediate risk FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma and lymphovascular invasion, addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy was associated with a survival benefit for patients with grade 3 tumors receiving vaginal brachytherapy.

Early mortality in epithelial ovarian cancer

e17585

Background: Investigate the prevalence and characteristics of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) who experience early mortality defined as death within 90 days of diagnosis. Methods: The National Cancer Database was accessed, and patients diagnosed with a pathologically confirmed EOC between 2004-2015 were identified. Patients who died within 90 days from diagnosis were identified. Clinico-pathological characteristics were compared with the chi-square and Mann Whitney U test. Results: A total of 150064 patients diagnosed with EOC were identified; 13561 (9%) patients died within 90 days from diagnosis with a decreasing incidence per year of diagnosis (from 9.8% in 2004 to 8% in 2015). These patients were older (median 76 vs 61 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be Black (11.4% vs 7.1%, p < 0.001), have government-issued insurance (75.6% vs 45.4%, p < 0.001), median income < 48000$ (45.1% vs 37.9%, p < 0.001), comorbidities (35% vs 19.1%, p < 0.001), reside closer to treatment facility (median 8 vs 12.3 miles, p < 0.001) and present to non-academic facilities (68.5% vs 58.1%, p < 0.001). Incidence of early mortality was 3.6% for patients aged < 65 years, 11.2% for those 65-79 years and 28.6% among those > = 80 years. For patients who experienced early mortality, 6067 (44.7%) did not receive any treatment, 2969 (21.9%) received chemotherapy only, 3345 (24.7%) underwent surgery only and 1180 (8.7%) received both. The rate of patients who did not receive any treatment was higher for patients aged > = 80 years (25.6%) compared to those aged 65-79 (6.9%) and < 65 years (2.5%), p < 0.001. For patients who underwent surgery, median inpatient stay was 9 days while unplanned readmission rate within 30-days from discharge was 10.8%. After controlling for insurance, type of treatment facility, comorbidities, income, race, and stage, octogenarians had higher odds of early mortality (OR 6.02, 95% CI: 5.65, 6.41) compared to those aged < 65 years. Higher odds of early mortality were also observed among octogenarians who received chemotherapy (OR 4.28, 95% CI: 3.84, 4.77) or surgery (OR 5.72, 95% CI: 5.15, 6.35) compared to those < 65 years, after controlling for the aforementioned confounders. Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 10 patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer will expire within 90 days from diagnosis. These patients are older and more likely to have medical comorbidities. More than 1 in 4 octogenarians with ovarian cancer will die within 90 days of diagnosis. Some of these patients may not be candidates for active treatment; however, interventions that facilitate timely presentation, target frailty, and allow medical optimization are greatly warranted.

Fertility-sparing surgery for patients with stage IC2 or IC3 epithelial ovarian carcinoma: any evidence of safety?

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the overall survival of patients with stage IC2/IC3 epithelial ovarian carcinoma undergoing fertility-sparing surgery.

METHODS

Patients aged <45 years diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2015 with epithelial ovarian carcinoma, who underwent surgical staging and had tumor involving the ovarian surface (IC2), malignant ascites or positive cytology (IC3), were identified in the National Cancer Database. The fertility-sparing surgery group included patients who had preservation of the uterus and the contralateral ovary while the radical surgery group included patients who had hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Overall survival was evaluated following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves while a Cox model was constructed to control for tumor grade and performance of lymphadenectomy. A systematic review of the literature was performed and cumulative relapse rate among patients with IC2/IC3 disease who underwent fertility-sparing surgery was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 235 cases were identified; 105 (44.7%) patients underwent fertility-sparing surgery. There was no difference in overall survival between the fertility-sparing and radical surgery groups (p=0.37; 5- year overall survival rates 90.2% and 85%, respectively). After controlling for tumor grade and performance of lymphadenectomy, fertility-sparing surgery was not associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.56, 2.62). A systematic review identified 151 patients with stage IC2/IC3 disease who underwent fertility-sparing surgery. Cumulative relapse rate was 19.3% (n=29) while 12 (6.7%) deaths were reported. Median time to recurrence was 19 (range 1-128.5) months. Tumor recurrence involved the ovary exclusively in 42% (11/26) of patients, while 15% (4/26) had a lymph node, 35% (9/26) a pelvic/abdominal, and 8% (2/26) a distant tumor relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients with stage IC2/IC3 epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fertility-sparing surgery was not associated with worse overall survival. However, based on a literature review, relapse rate is approximately 20%.

Ascites volume at the time of primary debulking and overall survival of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of malignant ascites volume on the outcomes of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma who undergo primary debulking surgery.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma and bulky intra-abdominal (TIIIC) disease between 2010 and 2015, who underwent primary debulking surgery followed by multi-agent chemotherapy and known status of residual disease, were drawn from the National Cancer Database. Based on available information, the presence and volume of malignant ascites was categorized as absent, low (<980 mL), and high (>980 mL) volume. Median overall survival was determined from Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log rank test. A multivariate Cox model was constructed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

2493 patients were identified; 31.9% (n=795) had no ascites, 40.2% (n=1001) had low, and 28% (n=697) had high volume malignant ascites. Rate of complete gross resection was higher for patients with no ascites (65.9%) compared with those with low (35.6%) and high (23%) volume ascites (p<0.001). After controlling for stage, histology, grade, age, and comorbidities, compared with those with no ascites, patients with low (odds ratio (OR) 3.49, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.89 to 4.26) and high (OR 6.40, 95% CI 5.07 to 8.06) volume ascites were more likely to have gross residual disease. For patients who achieved complete gross resection after controlling for confounders compared with patients with no ascites, those with low (hazard ratio (HR) 1.37, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.72) and high volume ascites (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.47 to 2.55) had worse overall survival. Similarly, patients with low volume ascites had better survival compared with those with high volume ascites (HR 0.71 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence and volume of malignant ascites at the time of primary debulking surgery was associated with the likelihood of achieving a complete gross resection and worse overall survival.

Emergency department utilization by gynecologic cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: unintended improvements in the selective use of emergency care?

Objectives:

To evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department (ED) utilization by gynecologic oncology patients in a large academic cancer center.

Methods:

Institutional data were captured from the EMR for the first 4 months of the US COVID-19 pandemic (March-June 2020) and compared to a historical control (March-June 2019). Data were collected from three major hospitals within an urban academic health system. Patients were identified as those with a gynecologic cancer diagnosis and active treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiation) within the prior 180 days of ED encounter, with an outpatient oncology visit within the last 90 days. Data including number and location of emergency department visits, admission outcomes, primary ICD-10 emergency department diagnosis, payer type, and patient demographics were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results:

Gynecologic oncology patients were significantly less likely to present to the ED for care during the first 4 months of COVID-19 (n=91) when compared to a historical control (n=144), p<0.01. Patients presenting during COVID were more likely to be admitted (43/91 vs 47/144, p<0.01), and to be kept for observation (18/43 vs 8/47, p=0.01). Of patients who were admitted, those presenting during COVID were significantly more likely to require an ICU stay during admission (12/43 vs 5/47, p=0.04). Six patients admitted during COVID (14%) died during their admission, while 3 patients (6%) died in the control group. There were no differences with respect to race, payor type, diagnosis, length of stay, or need for procedures when comparing patients admitted during COVID versus the control group. Four patients were COVID 19 positive during admission, which contributed to 1 patient death. Utilization of the health system's outpatient oncology urgent care center remained unchanged during COVID-19 (n=19 vs. n=15, p=0.43).

Conclusions:

Fewer gynecologic cancer patients presented to the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic, and those presenting had increased rates of indicated and complex care requirements. The concurrent stability in the outpatient urgent care center volume highlights a potential role for more stringent patient triaging to improve healthcare utilization in this vulnerable population going forward.

Outcomes of comprehensive lymphadenectomy for patients with advanced stage ovarian carcinoma and rare histologic sub-types

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic significance of comprehensive lymphadenectomy at the time of primary debulking surgery for patients with rare histologic sub-types of epithelial ovarian carcinoma and clinically advanced stage disease who underwent complete gross resection.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2015 with stage III-IV clear cell, endometrioid, mucinous, and low-grade serous carcinoma who underwent primary debulking surgery and achieved complete gross resection were identified. Patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy and those who underwent comprehensive lymphadenectomy (defined as at least 20 lymph nodes removed) were selected for further analysis. Overall survival was compared with the log-rank test and a Cox model was constructed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 381 patients were identified; 133 (34.9%) patients underwent comprehensive lymphadenectomy while 248 (65.1%) patients did not. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of patient race, age, presence of co-morbidities, type of treatment facility, disease stage, histology, and extent of intra-abdominal disease (p>0.05). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo comprehensive lymphadenectomy (p=0.42); median overall survival was 51.48 and 47.38 months, respectively. After controlling for patient age, race, insurance status, presence of co-morbidities, intra-abdominal tumor spread, stage and histology, performance of systematic lymphadenectomy was not associated with better survival (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.35).

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive lymphadenectomy is not associated with a survival benefit for patients with rare histologic sub-types of epithelial ovarian carcinoma and advanced stage disease who underwent primary debulking surgery and complete gross resection.

Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size <2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the oncologic outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size <2 cm who underwent open or minimally invasive radical hysterectomy.

METHODS

The Pubmed/Medline, Embase, and Web-of-Science databases were queried from inception to January 2021 (PROSPERO CRD 42020207971). Observational studies reporting progression-free survival and/or overall survival for patients who had open or minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size <2 cm were selected. Level of statistical heterogeneity was evaluated with the I² statistic. A random-effects model was used to compare progression and overall survival between the two groups and HR with 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the Der Simonian and Laird approach. Risk of bias and quality of included studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included encompassing 4935 patients. Of these, 2394 (48.5%) patients had minimally invasive and 2541 (51.5%) patients had open radical hysterectomy; respectively. Patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy had worse progression-free survival than those who had open surgery (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.20, 2.36, I² 26%). Based on five studies, patients who had minimally invasive (n=1808) hysterectomy had a trend towards worse overall survival than those who had open surgery (n=1853) (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.68, I² 15%).

CONCLUSION

Based on a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies that control for confounders, for patients with cervical cancer and tumor size <2 cm, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with worse progression-free survival than laparotomy.

Role of adjuvant radiation therapy after radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma and intermediate risk factors

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of observation-alone versus adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with lymph node negative FIGO 2018 stage IB cervical carcinoma following radical hysterectomy with negative prognostic factors.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients with no history of another tumor, diagnosed with intermediate risk (defined as tumor size 2-4 cm with lymph-vascular invasion or tumor size >4 cm) pathological stage IB squamous, adenosquamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the cervix between January 2010 and December 2015 who underwent radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy and had negative tumor margins were identified. Overall survival was assessed following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected confounders known to be associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 765 patients were identified and adjuvant external beam radiotherapy was administered to 378 patients (49.4%). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy, P=0.44: 4-year overall survival rates were 88.4% and 87.1% respectively. After controlling for patient age, histology, and surgical approach, the administration of adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with better survival (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.38). For patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy, there was no survival difference between those who did (n=219) and did not (n=159) receive concurrent chemotherapy, P=0.36: 4-year overall survival rates were 89.8% and 86.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of patients with lymph node negative, margin negative, stage IB cervical carcinoma, with negative prognostic factors, the administration of adjuvant external beam radiation therapy was not associated with a survival benefit compared with observation alone.

Minimally invasive hysterectomy for stage IA cervical carcinoma: a survival analysis of the National Cancer Database

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with stage IA cervical carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy.

METHODS

Patients with pathological stage IA (IA1, IA2, IA not otherwise specified) squamous, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix, no history of another tumor, who underwent radical or simple hysterectomy with known mode of surgery, diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with at least 1 month of follow-up, were drawn from the National Cancer Database. Comparisons of demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were made with the χ² test. The impact of minimally invasive surgery (robotic-assisted or traditional laparoscopic) on overall survival was assessed with the log-rank test following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox model was constructed to control for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 1930 patients were identified; the majority (73.3%, 1414 patients) had stage IA1 disease, while 458 (23.7%) patients had stage IA2, and 58 (3%) patients had stage IA not otherwise specified. In the present cohort, 685 patients (35.5%) had open, 438 patients (22.7%) had laparoscopic, and 807 patients (41.8%) had robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patients who had an open approach were more likely to undergo lymphadenectomy (58.1% vs 52.7%, p=0.021) and have radical hysterectomy (42% vs 32.4%, p<0.001). Patients who had minimally invasive surgery had a shorter hospital stay (median 1 vs 3 days, p<0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who had open and minimally invasive hysterectomy (p=0.87); 4-year overall survival rates were 97.7% and 98.6%, respectively. There was no difference in overall survival between the open and minimally invasive surgery groups for patients who had simple (p=0.61; 4-year overall survival rates 97.6% and 98.7%, respectively) or radical hysterectomy (p=0.70; 4-year overall survival rates 97.8% and 98.4%, respectively). After controlling for patient age, tumor histology, and presence of lymphovascular invasion, minimally invasive hysterectomy was not associated with worse survival (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.81). In a sensitivity analysis, based on 3048 patients with clinical stage IA after controlling for confounders, minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse survival than laparotomy (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.72).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients with stage IA cervical carcinoma, performance of minimally invasive hysterectomy was not associated with a detrimental effect on overall survival.