Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #62: Best practices in equitable care delivery-Addressing systemic racism and other social determinants of health as causes of obstetrical disparities

Hypertensive pregnancy disorder, an under-recognized women specific risk factor for heart failure?

During pregnancy, the maternal cardiovascular (CV) system undergoes major haemodynamic alterations ensuring adequate placental perfusion and a healthy pregnancy course. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) occur in almost 10% of gestations and preeclampsia, a more severe form, in 3-4%. Women with HDP demonstrated impaired myocardial function, biventricular chamber dysfunction and adverse biventricular remodelling. Shortly after delivery, women who experienced HDP express increased risk of classic CV risk factors such as hypertension, renal disease, abnormal lipid profile, and diabetes. Within the first two decades following a HDP, women experience increased rates of heart failure, chronic hypertension, ischaemic heart and cerebral disease. The mechanism underlying the relationship between HDP in younger women and CV disease later in life could be explained by sharing pre-pregnancy CV risk factors or due to a direct impact of HDP on the maternal CV system conferring a state of increased susceptibility to future metabolic or haemodynamic insults. Racial disparities in CV risk and social determinants of health also play an important role in their remote CV risk. Although there is general agreement that women who suffered from HDP should undertake early CV screening to allow appropriate prevention and timely treatment, a screening and intervention protocol has not been standardized due to limited available evidence. In this review, we discuss why women with hypertensive pregnancy may be disproportionately affected by heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and how cardiac remodelling during or after pregnancy may influence its development.

The Association between the Social Vulnerability Index and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

 Identifying underlying social risk factors for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission is important for designing interventions to reduce adverse outcomes. We aimed to determine whether a patient's exposure to community-level stressors as measured by the social vulnerability index (SVI) is associated with NICU admission.

STUDY DESIGN

 Retrospective cohort study (2014-2018) of patients delivering a liveborn ≥ 22 weeks' gestation at a quaternary care center. Patient addresses were used to assign each individual a composite SVI and theme score. The primary exposure was a composite SVI score categorized into tertiles. The primary outcome was NICU admission. Secondary outcomes included NICU length of stay and neonatal morbidity composite. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association between composite SVI and outcomes (low SVI as referent). We secondarily compared mean composite and theme SVI scores; individual components of each theme were also compared.

RESULTS

 From 2014 to 2018, 13,757 patients were included; 2,837 (21%) had a neonate with NICU admission. Patients with higher SVI were more likely to self-identify as Black race and have medical comorbidities. Living in areas with moderate or high SVI was not associated with NICU admission (moderate SVI adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.34; high SVI aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.95-1.33). Moderate SVI was associated with increased neonatal morbidity (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.001-1.38). In an analysis of SVI as a continuous variable, mean SVI scores were significantly higher in individuals who had an infant admitted to the NICU. Those requiring NICU admission lived in areas with lower per capita income and a higher number of mobile homes (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 Patients living in areas with moderate or high SVI were not shown to have higher odds of having a neonate admitted to the NICU. Neonatal morbidity was higher in those living in areas with moderate SVI. Increased access to social services may improve neonatal outcomes.

KEY POINTS

· Mean SVI scores are higher in those with a neonate admitted to the NICU.. · There was no observed association between moderate and high SVI scores and NICU admission.. · Moderate SVI is associated with an increased odds of overall neonatal morbidity.. · Greater exposure to low income may be associated with NICU admission..

Area Poverty and Adverse Birth Outcomes: An Opportunity for Quality Improvement

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between area poverty and adverse birth outcomes in the diverse birthing population of a large health system.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record and hospital administrative data for pregnant people at nine hospitals within a large health system in the Chicago metropolitan area from 2018 to 2023. Patient addresses were geocoded and categorized by Census tract area percent poor households. Unadjusted and adjusted Poisson regression models, controlling for individual-level risk factors, evaluated the independent association between area poverty and birth outcomes to determine the degree to which this association is attenuated by the inclusion of individual-level factors in the model.

RESULTS

The study included 85,025 pregnant people. Area poverty was associated with sociodemographic factors, including young age, non-Hispanic Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicaid insurance coverage, higher parity, and several comorbid conditions. Area poverty was associated with adverse birth outcomes and demonstrated a gradient effect with increasing area poverty in bivariable analyses. In unadjusted regression analyses, residence in areas with 5.0% or more poverty was associated with severe maternal morbidity, preterm birth, and low birth weight, and residence in areas with 8.0% or higher poverty was associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission. Although these associations persisted in multivariable analysis for severe maternal morbidity and neonatal intensive care unit admission, the associations with preterm birth and low birth weight persisted only for individuals residing in areas of 12.0% or higher poverty when controlling for individual-level risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Area poverty was associated with adverse birth outcomes in this birthing population even when controlling for individual-level risk factors, highlighting the need for system- and community-level quality-improvement interventions.

Investigating disparity in labor epidural analgesia management in black vs. white women: a retrospective case-control study (2018-2022)

BACKGROUND

Disparities in labor epidural analgesia (LEA) management could reduce maternal satisfaction and increase risk. We compared times from the first administration of breakthrough pain medication (top-up) to LEA replacement to evaluate disparities across race.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study (01-01-2018 to 12-31-2022), all patients with LEA and maternal race/ethnicity of non-Hispanic White or Black were eligible. Patients with a scheduled cesarean delivery, previous back instrumentation, or maternal age < 18 were excluded. We used a Cox Proportional Hazards model to evaluate our primary outcome. Predefined top-up medications given ≥60 minutes from initial LEA placement and before replacement were valid. Any replacement ≥60 minutes from the initial LEA was valid. We also studied secondary outcomes incidence of epidural replacement and postoperative patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

There were 11,168 total patients receiving LEA, with 479 (5.5%) replacements in White patients and 127 (5.0%) in Black patients. There were 387 (3.5%) LEAs with a top-up followed by replacement within 24 hours. After adjusting for confounders, no association was detected between race and LEA management (Hazard Ratio 0.82; 95% CI 0.63, 1.06; P = 0.13). We failed to detect an association between patient race and the incidence of replacement (P = 0.23). We found that race (P = 0.02) and LEA replacement (P < 0.001) were associated with increased odds of lower postpartum satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

We didn't detect disparity in treatment at our institution with standardized LEA management protocols. However, Black women and those with LEA replacements were less satisfied. Future studies should evaluate the generalizability and explore interventions that improve patient satisfaction.

Socioeconomic disadvantage in pregnancy and postpartum risk of cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy is an educable and actionable life stage to address social determinants of health (SDOH) and lifelong cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. However, the link between a risk score that combines multiple neighborhood-level social determinants in pregnancy and the risk of long-term CVD remains to be evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage measured by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) in early pregnancy is associated with a higher 30-year predicted risk of CVD postpartum, as measured by the Framingham Risk Score.

STUDY DESIGN

An analysis of data from the prospective Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study-Monitoring Mothers-to-Be Heart Health Study longitudinal cohort. Participant home addresses during early pregnancy were geocoded at the Census-block level. The exposure was neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage using the 2015 ADI by tertile (least deprived [T1], reference; most deprived [T3]) measured in the first trimester. Outcomes were the predicted 30-year risks of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD, composite of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease and stroke) and total CVD (composite of ASCVD plus coronary insufficiency, angina pectoris, transient ischemic attack, intermittent claudication, and heart failure) using the Framingham Risk Score measured 2 to 7 years after delivery. These outcomes were assessed as continuous measures of absolute estimated risk in increments of 1%, and, secondarily, as categorical measures with high-risk defined as an estimated probability of CVD ≥10%. Multivariable linear regression and modified Poisson regression models adjusted for baseline age and individual-level social determinants, including health insurance, educational attainment, and household poverty.

RESULTS

Among 4309 nulliparous individuals at baseline, the median age was 27 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 23-31) and the median ADI was 43 (IQR: 22-74). At 2 to 7 years postpartum (median: 3.1 years, IQR: 2.5, 3.7), the median 30-year risk of ASCVD was 2.3% (IQR: 1.5, 3.5) and of total CVD was 5.5% (IQR: 3.7, 7.9); 2.2% and 14.3% of individuals had predicted 30-year risk ≥10%, respectively. Individuals living in the highest ADI tertile had a higher predicted risk of 30-year ASCVD % (adjusted ß: 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19, 0.63) compared with those in the lowest tertile; and those living in the top 2 ADI tertiles had higher absolute risks of 30-year total CVD % (T2: adj. ß: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.72; T3: adj. ß: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.36, 1.13). Similarly, individuals living in neighborhoods in the highest ADI tertile were more likely to have a high 30-year predicted risk of ASCVD (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.21, 4.02) and total CVD ≥10% (aRR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.69).

CONCLUSION

Neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage in early pregnancy was associated with a higher estimated long-term risk of CVD postpartum. Incorporating aggregated SDOH into existing clinical workflows and future research in pregnancy could reduce disparities in maternal cardiovascular health across the lifespan, and requires further study.

Latina Women's Perinatal Experiences and Perspectives Around Discrimination, Anti-immigrant Policies, and Community Violence

OBJECTIVE

To describe experiences of Latina women who were currently pregnant or recently gave birth around discrimination, anti-immigrant policies, and community violence during the early COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN

Qualitative secondary analysis.

SETTING

Online or phone interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Latina women who were currently pregnant or recently gave birth (N = 26).

METHODS

We used reflexive thematic analysis to examine transcribed data from semistructured interviews conducted during the early COVID-19 pandemic with a subgroup of participants enrolled in a larger study related to prenatal care. Participants were English- or Spanish-speaking, Medicaid-eligible, Latina-identifying women who resided in Fresno County, California. We analyzed responses to questions about personal discrimination, the Black Lives Matter movement, and immigration policies using the theoretical frameworks of critical race theory and the political economy of health.

RESULTS

We identified four major themes: Avoidance of Community Engagement, Chronic Fear and Vigilance, The Role of Media, and Everyday Discrimination and Injustice.

CONCLUSION

Participant experiences reflect the pervasiveness of fear and socioeconomic inequity and call attention to the racialized structures that affect health and health care access for Latina women. These exposures during the perinatal period may have intergenerational effects. These findings underscore the need for responsive and race-conscious perinatal nursing care for Latina women, assessment of the effect of the current sociopolitical environment on well-being, and policies that support equitable access to health and social care.

Novel Insights on Group B Streptococcus in Pregnancy

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a frequent colonizer of the human genital and gastrointestinal tract. In pregnant or postpartum persons, colonization is often asymptomatic and can contribute to infectious morbidity in both the parturient and the newborn. The prevalence of invasive GBS disease has dramatically decreased over the past 3 decades. However, despite standardized clinical algorithms, GBS disease remains a public health concern. Our review summarizes the GBS bacteria pathophysiology, morbidity, management guidelines, and summarizes ongoing research. While novel testing and parturient vaccination are being explored, barriers exist, preventing guideline updates and widespread implementation.

Racialized inequities in live birth after cancer: A population-based study of 63,000 female adolescents and young adults with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Fertility after cancer is a top concern for adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYAs) (15-39 years old at diagnosis). The authors characterized live births after cancer by race and ethnicity ("race/ethnicity") in a population-based sample of female AYAs.

METHODS

This study used Texas Cancer Registry data linked to birth certificates (1995-2016) to estimate cumulative incidence of live birth, based on first live birth after cancer, and compared differences by race/ethnicity. Proportional subdistribution hazards models were used to estimate associations between race/ethnicity and live birth, adjusted for diagnosis age, cancer type, stage, year, and prior live birth, overall and for each cancer type.

RESULTS

Among 65,804 AYAs, 10-year cumulative incidence of live birth was lower among non-Hispanic Black AYAs than other racial/ethnic groups: 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.4-10.9) compared to 15.9% (95% CI, 14.1-17.9) among Asian or Pacific Islander, 14.7% (95% CI, 14.2-15.3) among Hispanic, and 15.2% (95% CI, 14.8-15.6) among non-Hispanic White AYAs (p < .01). In the adjusted overall model, Black AYAs were less likely to have a live birth after cancer than all other groups. In adjusted models for each cancer type, live birth was significantly less likely for Black AYAs with gynecologic cancers or lymphomas (compared to White AYAs) or thyroid cancers (compared to Hispanic AYAs).

CONCLUSION

Black AYAs are less likely than AYAs of other races/ethnicities to have a live birth after cancer, in contrast to patterns of live birth in the general population. Research and action to promote childbearing equity after cancer are imperative.

ACOG Committee Statement No. 10: Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Disparate health outcomes and unequal access to care have long plagued many communities in the United States. Individual demographic characteristics, such as geography, income, education, and race, have been identified as critical factors when seeking to address inequitable health outcomes. To provide the best care possible, obstetrician-gynecologists should be keenly aware of the existence of and contributors to health inequities and be engaged in the work needed to eliminate racial and ethnic health inequities. Obstetrician-gynecologists should improve their understanding of the etiologies of health inequities by participating in lifelong learning to understand the roles clinician bias and personally mediated, systemic, and structural racism play in creating and perpetuating adverse health outcomes and health care experiences.

Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity Associated with Maternal Comorbidity Burden and Social Vulnerability

OBJECTIVE

 We evaluated the associations of the obstetric comorbidity index (OB-CMI) and social vulnerability index (SVI) with severe maternal morbidity (SMM).

STUDY DESIGN

 Multicenter retrospective cohort study of all patients who delivered (gestational age > 20 weeks) within a university health system from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021. OB-CMI scores were assigned to patients using clinical documentation and diagnosis codes. SVI scores, released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), were assigned to patients based on census tracts. The primary outcome was SMM, based on the 21 CDC indicators. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to model the odds of SMM as a function of OB-CMI and SVI while adjusting for maternal race and ethnicity, insurance type, preferred language, and parity.

RESULTS

 In total, 73,518 deliveries were analyzed. The prevalence of SMM was 4% (n = 2,923). An association between OB-CMI and SMM was observed (p < 0.001), where OB-CMI score categories of 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 were associated with higher odds of SMM compared with an OB-CMI score category of 0. In the adjusted model, there was evidence of an interaction between OB-CMI and maternal race and ethnicity (p = 0.01). After adjusting for potential confounders, including SVI, non-Hispanic Black patients had the highest odds of SMM among patients with an OB-CMI score category of 1 and ≥4 compared with non-Hispanic White patients with an OB-CMI score of 0 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.08-3.66 and aOR = 10.07, 95% CI: 8.42-12.03, respectively). The association between SVI and SMM was not significant on adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSION

 OB-CMI was significantly associated with SMM, with higher score categories associated with higher odds of SMM. A significant interaction between OB-CMI and maternal race and ethnicity was identified, revealing racial disparities in the odds of SMM within each higher OB-CMI score category. SVI was not associated with SMM after adjusting for confounders.

KEY POINTS

· OB-CMI was significantly associated with SMM.. · Racial disparities were seen within each OB-CMI score group.. · SVI was not associated with SMM on adjusted analysis..

Doula Services and Birth Outcomes: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Doulas offer support and advice to some women during the childbirth process, however access to doula care is not available to all due to availability and cost.

METHODS

This scoping review synthesizes literature related to the use of doula services and the experiences and outcomes of those who used the services. Eligibility criteria included peer-reviewed studies conducted in the United States and published between 2010 and 2022 that specified use of doulas and assessed maternal experiences and outcomes. Articles were accessed through PubMed, Google Scholar, and PsycInfo.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles met the criteria and were included in the review. Findings across eligible articles included qualitative analyses related to psychosocial aspects of experience and quantitative findings on birth experience, complications, breastfeeding initiation, and emotional health.

DISCUSSION

Findings suggest having doula support can improve experiences and outcomes. However, further implementation and evaluation is needed as well as greater access to doula services among the childbearing population who are historically marginalized and minoritized.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Clinical quality measures in obstetrics

This article provides an updated overview and critique of clinical quality measures relevant to obstetrical care. The history of the quality movement in the United States and the proliferation of quality metrics over the past quarter-century are reviewed. Common uses of quality measures are summarized: payment programs, accreditation, public reporting, and quality improvement projects. We present listings of metrics that are reported by physicians or hospitals, either voluntarily or by mandate, to government agencies, payers, "watchdog" ratings organizations, and other entities. The costs and other burdens of extracting data and reporting metrics are summarized. The potential for unintended adverse consequences of the use of quality metrics is discussed along with approaches to mitigating adverse consequences. Finally, some recent attempts to develop simplified core measure sets are presented, with the promise that the complex and burdensome quality-metric enterprise may improve in the near future.

Obstetric violence is a misnomer

The term "obstetric violence" has been used in the legislative language of several countries to protect mothers from abuse during pregnancy. Subsequently, it has been expanded to include a spectrum of obstetric procedures, such as induction of labor, episiotomy, and cesarean delivery, and has surfaced in the peer-reviewed literature. The term "obstetric violence" can be seen as quite strong and emotionally charged, which may lead to misunderstandings or misconceptions. It might be interpreted as implying a deliberate act of violence by healthcare providers when mistreatment can sometimes result from systemic issues, lack of training, or misunderstandings rather than intentional violence. "Obstetric mistreatment" is a more comprehensive term that can encompass a broader range of behaviors and actions. "Violence" generally refers to the intentional use of physical force to cause harm, injury, or damage to another person (eg, physical assault, domestic violence, street fights, or acts of terrorism), whereas "mistreatment" is a more general term and refers to the abuse, harm, or control exerted over another person (such as nonconsensual medical procedures, verbal abuse, disrespect, discrimination and stigmatization, or neglect, to name a few examples). There may be cases where unprofessional personnel may commit mistreatment and violence against pregnant patients, but as obstetrics is dedicated to the health and well-being of pregnant and fetal patients, mistreatment of obstetric patients should never be an intended component of professional obstetric care. It is necessary to move beyond the term "obstetric violence" in discourse and acknowledge and address the structural dimensions of abusive reproductive practices. Similarly, we do not use the term "psychiatric violence" for appropriately used professional procedures in psychiatry, such as electroshock therapy, or use the term "neurosurgical violence" when drilling a burr hole. There is an ongoing need to raise awareness about the potential mistreatment of obstetric patients within the context of abuse against women in general. Using the term "mistreatment in healthcare" instead of the more limited term "obstetric violence" is more appropriate and applies to all specialties when there is unprofessional abuse and mistreatment, such as biased care, neglect, emotional abuse (verbal), or physical abuse, including performing procedures that are unnecessary, unindicated, or without informed patient consent. Healthcare providers must promote unbiased, respectful, and patient-centered professional care; provide an ethical framework for all healthcare personnel; and work toward systemic change to prevent any mistreatment or abuse in our specialty.

Skin-To-Skin Contact During Cesarean Birth in the United States over the Last Decade

PURPOSE

To assess skin-to-skin contact during cesarean birth, including incidence and maternal characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A cross-sectional, retrospective study using survey methods was conducted. Women who had a cesarean birth within the last 10 years prior to January 2022 were recruited via social media. Descriptive statistics, chi square, and binary logistic regression analyses were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 2,327 participants, of which 29.7% experienced skin-to-skin contact during their cesarean birth. This was reported to be less often than desired. Significant associations were found among skin-to-skin contact during cesarean birth and planned cesarean birth, previous cesarean birth, maternal age, level of education, and birth region. Previous vaginal birth and race were not significantly associated with skin-to-skin contact during cesarean birth. Most (93.65%) respondents identified as White. Barriers to skin-to-skin contact during cesarean birth may be birth region, unplanned or emergency cesarean births, younger age, lacking a college degree, and lack of previous cesarean births.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

There are differences in incidence and access to skin-to-skin contact during cesarean birth. Our findings emphasize the continued need to address disparities in care, increase maternal health care equity, and make skin-to-skin contact during cesarean birth available for all women who desire it.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Delivery In-Hospital Mortality or Maternal End-Organ Injury: A Multistate Analysis, 2007-2020

Background: In the United States, Black maternal mortality is 2-4 × higher than that of White maternal mortality, with differences also present in severe maternal morbidity and other measures. However, limited research has comprehensively studied multilevel social determinants of health, and their confounding and effect modification on obstetrical outcomes. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective multistate analysis of adult inpatient delivery hospitalizations (Florida, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Washington) between 2007 and 2020. Multilevel multivariable models were used to test the confounder-adjusted association for race/ethnicity and the binary outcomes (1) in-hospital mortality or maternal end-organ injury and (2) in-hospital mortality only. Stratified analyses were performed to test effect modification. Results: The confounder-adjusted odds ratio showed that Black (1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-1.36) and Hispanic (1.14, 95% CI: 1.11-1.18) as compared with White patients were more likely to die in-hospital or experience maternal end-organ injury. For Black and Hispanic patients, stratified analysis showed that findings remained significant in almost all homogeneous strata. After statistical adjustment, Black as compared with White patients were more likely to die in-hospital (1.49, 95% CI: 1.21-1.82). Conclusions: Black and Hispanic patients had higher adjusted odds of in-patient mortality and end-organ damage after birth than White patients. Race and ethnicity serve as strong predictors of health care inequality, and differences in outcomes may reflect broader structural racism and individual implicit bias. Proposed solutions require immense and multifaceted active efforts to restructure how obstetrical care is provided on the societal, hospital, and patient level.

Predictors of Postpartum Depression Among Women with Low Incomes in the United States

PURPOSE

To evaluate the predictors of postpartum depression and to examine the effects of maternal racial identity on postpartum depression among women with low incomes in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a secondary data analysis using baseline data from the Baby's First Years study, including postpartum women living below the federal poverty line who were recruited from four diverse communities in the United States. Postpartum depression symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Logistic regressions were performed to identify associations between pre-identified postpartum depression risk factors and postpartum depression among participants, followed by predictive margins analyses to elaborate on probability of postpartum depression across different racial identity groups in the sample.

RESULTS

The sample included 1,051 postpartum women. Almost one-half of participants identified as Black (45.9%), followed by White (20.7%), American Indian (1.8%), and Asian (1.3%). Prevalence of postpartum depression in the sample was 24%. Financial insecurity and alcohol use were positively associated with postpartum depression, whereas level of education and reported physical health were negatively associated with postpartum depression. Mothers who identified as Black had an 8.3% higher probability of postpartum depression than that of White mothers in the sample.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Nurses working with populations with low income should assess social determinants of health to provide holistic mental health care. Women with low incomes should be referred to resources which account for their financial burden. Racial disparities exist in perinatal care, and birth and postpartum mental health outcomes. It is crucial to address the systemic racism faced by Black mothers experiencing postpartum depression.

Development of a Maternal Equity Safety Bundle to Eliminate Racial Inequities in Massachusetts

OBJECTIVE

The PNQIN (Perinatal-Neonatal Quality Improvement Network of Massachusetts) sought to adapt the Reduction of Peripartum Racial and Ethnic Disparities Conceptual Framework and Maternal Safety Consensus Bundle by selecting and defining measures to create a bundle to address maternal health inequities in Massachusetts. This study describes the process of developing consensus-based measures to implement the PNQIN Maternal Equity Bundle across Massachusetts hospitals participating in the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health Initiative.

METHODS

Our team used a mixed-methods approach to create the PNQIN Maternal Equity Bundle through consensus including a literature review, expert interviews, and a modified Delphi process to compile, define, and select measures to drive maternal equity-focused action. Stakeholders were identified by purposive and snowball sampling and included obstetrician-gynecologists, midwives, nurses, epidemiologists, and racial equity scholars. Dedoose 9.0 was used to complete an inductive analysis of interview transcripts. A modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus on recommendations and measures for the PNQIN Maternal Equity Bundle.

RESULTS

Twenty-five interviews were completed. Seven themes emerged, including the need for 1) data stratification by race, ethnicity and language; 2) performance of a readiness assessment; 3) culture shift toward equity; 4) inclusion of antiracism and bias training; 5) addressing challenges of nonacademic hospitals; 6) a life-course approach; and 7) selection of timing of implementation. Twenty initial quality measures (structure, process, and outcome) were identified through expert interviews. Group consensus supported 10 measures to be incorporated into the bundle.

CONCLUSION

Structure, process, and outcome quality measures were selected and defined for a maternal equity safety bundle that seeks to create an equity-focused infrastructure and equity-specific actions at birthing facilities. Implementation of an equity-focused safety bundle at birthing facilities may close racial gaps in maternal outcomes.

Community Health Worker Home Visiting, Birth Outcomes, Maternal Care, and Disparities Among Birthing Individuals With Medicaid Insurance

Importance

Home visiting is recommended to address maternal and infant health disparities but is underused with mixed impacts on birth outcomes. Community health workers, working with nurses and social workers in a combined model, may be a strategy to reach high-risk individuals, improve care and outcomes, and address inequities.

Objective

To assess the association of participation in a home visiting program provided by community health workers working with nurses and social workers (Strong Beginnings) with adverse birth outcomes and maternal care vs usual care among birthing individuals with Medicaid.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, population-based, propensity score matching cohort study used an administrative linked database, including birth records and Medicaid claims, linked to program participation. The Strong Beginnings program exposure took place in 1 county that includes the second largest metropolitan area in Michigan. Study participants included primarily non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Strong Beginnings participants and all mother-infant dyads with a Medicaid-insured birth in the other Michigan counties (2016 through 2019) as potential matching nonparticipants. The data were analyzed between 2021 and 2023.

Exposure

Participation in Strong Beginnings or usual care.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Preterm birth (less than 37 weeks' gestation at birth), very preterm birth (less than 32 weeks' gestation), low birth weight (less than 2500 g at birth), very low birth weight (less than 1500 g), adequate prenatal care, and postnatal care (3 weeks and 60 days).

Results

A total of 125 252 linked Medicaid-eligible mother-infant dyads (mean age [SD], 26.6 [5.6] years; 27.1% non-Hispanic Black) were included in the analytical sample (1086 in Strong Beginnings [mean age (SD), 25.5 (5.8) years]; 124 166 in usual prenatal care [mean age (SD), 26.6 (5.5) years]). Of the participants, 144 of 1086 (13.3%) in the SB group and 14 984 of 124 166 (12.1%) in the usual care group had a preterm birth. Compared with usual prenatal care, participation in the Strong Beginnings program was significantly associated with reduced risk of preterm birth (-2.2%; 95% CI, -4.1 to -0.3), very preterm birth (-1.2%; 95% CI, -2.0 to -0.4), very low birth weight (-0.8%; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.3), and more prevalent adequate prenatal care (3.1%; 95% CI, 0.6-5.6), postpartum care in the first 3 weeks after birth (21%; 95% CI, 8.5-33.5]), and the first 60 days after birth (23.8%; 95% CI, 9.7-37.9]).

Conclusions and Relevance

Participation in a home visiting program provided by community health workers working with nurses and social workers, compared with usual care, was associated with reduced risk for adverse birth outcomes, improved prenatal and postnatal care, and reductions in disparities, among birthing individuals with Medicaid. The risk reductions in adverse birth outcomes were greater among Black individuals.

Screening for Social Determinants of Health During Prenatal Care: Why, What, and How

As more data from maternal mortality reviews are available, it has become clear that social determinants of health have major impacts on the morbidity and mortality of mothers and infants. The ability to verify and address these requires an effective screening process during prenatal care. The challenges include selection of an appropriate tool for use in pregnancy; incorporating the tool into the clinical flow to ensure screening of all pregnant patients; and developing an approach to address the issues, be it providing emotional support, management within the clinic, or referring to outside resources.

Obstetrical health care inequities in a universally insured health care system

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities in health care exist and are rooted in long-standing systemic inequities. These disparities result in significant excess health care expenditures and are due to complex interactions between patients, health care providers and systems, and social and environmental factors. In perinatal care, these inequities also exist, with Black patients being 3 to 4 times more likely to die of childbirth compared with White patients. Similar health care inequities may also exist in the Military Health System despite universal health care coverage, stable employment, and social programs that benefit military families.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes in the Military Health System.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of deliveries from 2019 to 2021 in the Military Health System, which provides obstetrical care for approximately 35,000 annual deliveries. The study was conducted using National Perinatal Information Center data on cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and severe maternal morbidity by race and ethnicity from direct-care military hospitals representing tertiary care medical centers and community hospitals in the United States and abroad. Chi-square analyses and binary logistic regression were used to compare groups.

RESULTS

The cohort included 68,918 deliveries. Of these, 32,358 (47%) were White, 9594 (13.9%) Black, 3120 (4.5%) Asian Pacific Islander, 456 (0.7%) American Indian/Alaska Native, 19,543 (28.4%) other, 3976 (5.8%) unknown, 7096 (10.3%) Hispanic, 58,009 (84.2%) non-Hispanic, and 4399 (6.4%) other ethnicity. Rates of cesarean delivery were significantly higher for Black (30%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.52), Asian Pacific Islander (27%; odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.35), and other (26%; odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.25) compared with White race (23%) (P<.001). Postpartum hemorrhage rates were higher for Black (5.9%; odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.24) and Asian Pacific Islander (7.7%; odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.72) compared with White race (5.3%) (P<.001). Severe maternal morbidity was higher for Black (2.9%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.67), Asian Pacific Islander (2.9%; odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.82), and other (2.8%; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.54) compared with White race (2.1%) (P<.001). For severe maternal morbidity excluding blood transfusions, rates were also significantly higher for Black (1%; odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.17) than for White race (0.6%) (P<.002). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a lower rate of severe maternal morbidity excluding transfusions (0.5%; odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.98) compared with non-Hispanic ethnicity (0.7%) (P=.04).

CONCLUSION

Racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes exist in the Military Health System despite universal health care coverage, with significantly higher rates of cesarean delivery and severe maternal morbidity in Black, Asian Pacific Islander, and other races compared with White race. These findings suggest that these disparities are likely related to other factors or social determinants of health rather than availability of health care and insurance coverage. Further work should include investigation into such social determinants of health to address their causes, including systemic and structural barriers.

Neighborhood disinvestment and severe maternal morbidity in the state of California

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health, including neighborhood context, may be a key driver of severe maternal morbidity and its related racial and ethnic inequities; however, investigations remain limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the associations between neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and severe maternal morbidity, as well as whether the associations between neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and severe maternal morbidity were modified by race and ethnicity.

STUDY DESIGN

This study leveraged a California statewide data resource on all hospital births at ≥20 weeks of gestation (1997-2018). Severe maternal morbidity was defined as having at least 1 of 21 diagnoses and procedures (eg, blood transfusion or hysterectomy) as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neighborhoods were defined as residential census tracts (n=8022; an average of 1295 births per neighborhood), and the neighborhood deprivation index was a summary measure of 8 census indicators (eg, percentage of poverty, unemployment, and public assistance). Mixed-effects logistic regression models (individuals nested within neighborhoods) were used to compare odds of severe maternal morbidity across quartiles (quartile 1 [the least deprived] to quartile 4 [the most deprived]) of the neighborhood deprivation index before and after adjustments for maternal sociodemographic and pregnancy-related factors and comorbidities. Moreover, cross-product terms were created to determine whether associations were modified by race and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Of 10,384,976 births, the prevalence of severe maternal morbidity was 1.2% (N=120,487). In fully adjusted mixed-effects models, the odds of severe maternal morbidity increased with increasing neighborhood deprivation index (odds ratios: quartile 1, reference; quartile 4, 1.23 [95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.26]; quartile 3, 1.13 [95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.16]; quartile 2, 1.06 [95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.08]). The associations were modified by race and ethnicity such that associations (quartile 4 vs quartile 1) were the strongest among individuals in the "other" racial and ethnic category (1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.86) and the weakest among Black individuals (1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.16).

CONCLUSION

Study findings suggest that neighborhood deprivation contributes to an increased risk of severe maternal morbidity. Future research should examine which aspects of neighborhood environments matter most across racial and ethnic groups.

Understanding social needs in pregnancy: Prospective validation of a digital short-form screening tool and patient survey

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health significantly affect health outcomes, yet are infrequently addressed in prenatal care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to improve the efficiency and experience of addressing social needs in pregnancy through: (1) testing a digital short-form screening tool; and (2) characterizing pregnant people's preferences for social needs screening and management.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool from PRAPARE (Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks, and Experiences), and a survey to query patients' preferences for addressing social needs. Instruments were administered online to peripartum participants, with equal representation of patients with public and private insurance. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the short-form tool vs PRAPARE. Quantitative responses were characterized using descriptive statistics. Free-text responses were analyzed with matrix and thematic coding. Survey data were analyzed by subgroups of historically marginalized populations.

RESULTS

A total of 215 people completed the survey. Participants were predominantly White (167; 77.7%) and multiparous (145; 67.4%). Unmet social needs were prevalent with both the short-form tool (77.7%) and PRAPARE (96.7%). The sensitivity (79.3%) and specificity (71.4%) of the short-form screener were high for detecting any social need. Most participants believed that it was important for their pregnancy care team to know their social needs (material: 173, 80.5%; support: 200, 93.0%), and over half felt comfortable sharing their needs through in-person or digital modalities if assistance was or was not available (material: 117, 54.4%; support: 122, 56.7%). Free-text themes reflected considerations for integrating social needs in routine prenatal care. Acceptability of addressing social needs in pregnancy was high among all groups.

CONCLUSION

A digital short-form social determinants of health screening tool performs well when compared with the gold standard. Pregnant people accept social needs as a part of routine pregnancy care. Future work is needed to operationalize efficient, effective, patient-centered approaches to addressing social needs in pregnancy.