Bifrontal-transcranial direct current stimulation as an early augmentation strategy in major depressive disorder: A single-blind randomised controlled trial

Safety and efficacy of early augmentation with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is an emerging modality with demonstrated efficacy in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), however, there is paucity of research in adolescent depression. This study attempts to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tDCS in adolescents with MDD as an early augmentation to drug therapy.

METHODS

Adolescents with MDD aged 10-18 years were enrolled in the study and allocated to active or sham groups as per randomization. Sertraline was given in the range of 25-50 mg to each participant. After baseline assessments, 10 sessions of tDCS were given with 2 mA current for 20 minutes, keeping anode at left DLPFC and cathode at right DLPFC. Side effects were assessed and rating scales were reapplied at 2 weeks and then 6 weeks. Results were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were analysed (15-active, 17-sham). At 2 weeks, the BDI and BAI scores of the true group were significantly lower than the sham group, and the reduction in the scores of the former was statistically greater. This significance did not persist at 6 weeks, and the reduction in the scores of the two groups was significantly different from baseline to 2-weeks and 6-weeks. Response and remission rates were higher in the active group at 6 weeks. Adverse effects were comparable.

CONCLUSION

tDCS is safe and effective for early augmentation of drugs in adolescents with MDD. However, effects do not last long after termination of sessions. Further studies are needed with a larger sample size and longer follow-ups.

Early augmentation therapy with dextromethorphan in mild to moderate major depressive disorder: A group sequential, response adaptive randomized controlled trial

AIM

Therapeutic latency, lack of response, and adverse drug reactions are major challenges in current treatment approaches for major depressive disorder (MDD). Following the success of ketamine, more clinical research on NMDA antagonists is needed for a safe and long-term therapy in MDD. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunct dextromethorphan to SSRIs in MDD.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, add-on, placebo-controlled, group sequential design clinical trial, 60 patients with MDD were randomized to receive either adjunct dextromethorphan (30 mg) or adjunct placebo to SSRI for eight weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the MADRS score over eight weeks, and the secondary outcome parameters were response rate, remission rate, change in CGI-S, CGI-I, change in serum BDNF and serum dextromethorphan.

RESULTS

The results showed a significantly greater reduction in MADRS score from baseline (MD: -3.94; 95 %CI: -5.81 to -2.06; p < 0.001; Cohen's d: 1.05), reduction in CGI-S score (p = 0.002), higher response (p = 0.008) and remission (p = 0.007) rate in the test group compared to the control group. The test group also showed significantly better CGI-I score (p = 0.001) compared to the control group. However, no significant difference was found in the change in serum BDNF (p = 0.751) between the groups. In the test group, serum dextromethorphan levels in all patients were within the therapeutic range. The occurrence of adverse events was comparable in both study groups.

CONCLUSION

Early augmentation of SSRIs with dextromethorphan (30 mg/day) for the treatment of mild to moderate MDD may improve clinical outcomes significantly in terms of improvement in symptoms, response rate and remission rate. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05181527.

Effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in management of treatment-resistant depression: A retrospective chart review

Background

There is a limited number of studies from India investigating the role of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). This clinic-based study reports on the effectiveness of tDCS as an add-on treatment in individuals suffering from TRD.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-six right-handed individuals suffering from major depressive disorder who failed to respond to adequate trials of at least two antidepressant drugs in the current episode received tDCS as an augmenting treatment. Twice daily sessions of conventional tDCS were given providing anodal stimulation at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cathodal placement at the right DLPFC. A total of 20 sessions were given over 2 weeks. The outcome was assessed based on changes in scores of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

Results

There was a significant reduction in outcome assessment after tDCS intervention as compared to baseline, with more than 50% of the participants showing response in both scales, which increased further to approximately 77% by the end of 1 month of the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Twice daily tDCS sessions with anodal stimulation of left DLPFC and cathodal stimulation of right DLPFC is an effective add-on treatment strategy in individuals with TRD.

A Review of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Medication and Psychotherapy for Depression

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After participating in this CME activity, the psychiatrist should be better able to:• Compare and contrast therapies used in combination with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for treating MDD.

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive neuromodulation, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has emerged as a major area for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). This review has two primary aims: (1) to review the current literature on combining TMS and tDCS with other therapies, such as psychotherapy and psychopharmacological interventions, and (2) to discuss the efficacy, feasibility, limitations, and future directions of these combined treatments for MDD.

METHOD

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched three databases: PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library. The last search date was December 5, 2023.

RESULTS

The initial search revealed 2,519 records. After screening and full-text review, 58 studies (7 TMS plus psychotherapy, 32 TMS plus medication, 7 tDCS plus psychotherapy, 12 tDCS plus medication) were included.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature on tDCS and TMS paired with psychotherapy provides initial support for integrating mindfulness interventions with both TMS and tDCS. Adding TMS or tDCS to stable doses of ongoing medications can decrease MDD symptoms; however, benzodiazepines may interfere with TMS and tDCS response, and antipsychotics can interfere with TMS response. Pairing citalopram with TMS and sertraline with tDCS can lead to greater MDD symptom reduction compared to using these medications alone. Future studies need to enroll larger samples, include randomized controlled study designs, create more uniform protocols for combined treatment delivery, and explore mechanisms and predictors of change.

Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with antidepressant medications for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Antidepressants, noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS), and their combination are commonly used in routine clinical practice. Nevertheless, there is a continuous dispute regarding whether the effectiveness of NIBS in combination with antidepressants exceeds that of antidepressants alone. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the existing evidence and draw a definitive conclusion on this issue.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of five databases: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, SinoMed, and the Cochrane Database of Randomized Controlled Trials. The search was conducted until October 6, 2023. The primary outcomes were the pre- and post-intervention depression and anxiety scores. Secondary outcomes included dropout rates, response rates, and certain levels of neurotransmitters [ 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)] at the end of the intervention. Subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. The data were analysed using R 4.2.2.

RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs [1357 participants; 11 studies used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and 7 studies used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)]. The follow-up duration varied from two weeks to three months. Overall, whether in combination with rTMS or tDCS, antidepressants proved more effective in alleviating depressive symptoms compared to when used as monotherapy. However, this advantage was not evident during the follow-up period. (p > 0.05). And the combination's efficacy in improving anxiety was found to be lacking. Post-treatment serum levels of 5-HT, DA, and GABA were higher in the rTMS group were higher than antidepressant medication group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, subgroup analysis results indicated that only the rTMS + antidepressant medication treatment significantly improved remission and remission rates. The meta-regression results showed that the type of antidepressant and the sex of the participants had a significant association with the depression score.

CONCLUSION

Combination treatment with NIBS was significantly more effective in improving depression symptoms than medication alone. rTMS combined with antidepressants appears to be more effective in improving response and remission rates. However, efficacy may be influenced by the type of medicine used in combination, and long-term efficacy data is lacking.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023388259.

Research on treatment-related aspects of depression from India in the preceding decade (2014-2023): An updated systematic review

Background

The National Mental Health Survey reports a prevalence of 2.7% for depressive disorders in India. The services for depression patients may be organized differently in India as compared to Western countries. It is important to consider studies conducted in India to determine effective interventions for depression catered specifically to the needs of the Indian population. We intended to systematically review the articles studying the usefulness of various treatment modalities in the management of depression in the Indian context.

Materials and Methods

We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect to identify studies published in peer-reviewed English language journals. All articles from India evaluating the clinical efficacy of anti-depressants, electro-convulsive therapy, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and psychological interventions for the management of depression were evaluated. Data were extracted using standard procedures.

Results

A total of 36 studies were included in the review. Out of those, 15 were studies on drug efficacy, five on neuro-modulation, nine on psycho-social interventions, four on adverse effects, and three on miscellaneous studies. Innovations were seen in the field of neuro-modulation and psycho-social intervention. Trials on drug efficacy and adverse drug reactions require larger sample sizes, more studies on newer agents, and more robust study designs.

Conclusion

More research is needed to understand the effectiveness and potential negative effects of depression treatments in India. Studies on ketamine have been inconclusive, and existing research on pharmacological agents is limited. Neuro-modulation studies show promise, but larger-scale studies are needed. Innovative psychological interventions tailored to the Indian population include community-based and digital technology-driven care.