The evolving use of biomarkers in heart transplantation: Consensus of an expert panel

Emerging role of circulating piRNAs in the diagnosis of heart transplant rejection

BACKGROUND

Liquid biopsy offers a potential alternative to decrease or eliminate endomyocardial biopsy for diagnosing allograft rejection. p-element-induced wimpy testis-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are novel and promising disease biomarkers for their intrinsic characteristics such as stability in body fluids; however, their role in allograft rejection remains unexplored.

METHODS

A training set based on small RNA sequencing technology was performed to identify piRNAs in endomyocardial tissue (n = 8) and serum samples (n = 40) from patients following heart transplantation. A validation set of the potential piRNAs identified in the training study was conducted in an independent larger cohort for the detection of acute cellular rejection (ACR, n = 105) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR, n = 61).

RESULTS

We identified 20,292 piRNAs in endomyocardial tissue and 24,602 piRNAs in serum samples from patients following heart transplantation. We identified 7 piRNAs with a coincident expression profile in both types of samples and potential capacity for the noninvasive detection of cardiac rejection. Validation in a large independent cohort demonstrated that a panel of these piRNAs showed excellent performance for detecting grade ≥2R ACR (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.819; p < 0.0001) and grade 1R ACR (AUC = 0.721; p = 0.001). Furthermore, our piRNA panel showed a potential discrimination ability of pAMR2 (AUC = 0.967; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of knowledge, this study is the first to report the presence of piRNAs in both endomyocardial tissue and serum samples of patients after heart transplant, including their association with allograft rejection events. We propose a novel piRNA panel for the detection of cardiac allograft rejection.

Using a combination of biomarkers to monitor allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients

Allograft dysfunction is a major limitation of survival in organ transplant recipients including those who have received lung transplantation. Early detection of allograft dysfunction is thus crucial to improve outcomes in these patients. However, there are several causes of allograft dysfunction with allograft infection and rejection being the two important causes. It is often difficult to distinguish between those causes as the presentation can be similar. Allograft rejection, especially antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) are often identified too late where progression has already occurred. Biomarkers like anti-HLA antibodies including donor-specific antibodies (DSA), donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), immune cell function (ICF) assays and next-generation sequencing for microorganisms allow for early identification of allograft dysfunction as well as differentiate rejection from other processes such as infection. This in turn allows for early intervention and, ideally, improved long-term allograft outcomes. Greater evidence exists for these biomarkers in other solid organ transplantations including kidney and heart transplantation, but application to lung transplant recipients is increasing and seems equally promising. In this review, we evaluate existing evidence for using these biomarkers and share our center practice in utilizing a combination of these biomarkers post-transplantation to assess for allograft dysfunction.

Circulating Tissue Specific Extracellular Vesicles for Noninvasive Monitoring of Acute Cellular Rejection in Clinical Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

There remains a critical need for biomarkers of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in heart transplantation. We hypothesized that immunopathophysiology of ACR is reflected via dynamic changes in the protein and RNA cargoes of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) released by cardiac allograft and T cells into circulation, thus enabling noninvasive window into ACR.

METHODS

T-cell sEVs were enriched using anti-CD3 antibody beads, and antidonor HLA I antibody beads for donor sEVs. Cargoes of donor sEVs (cardiac troponin T [cTnT] protein and mRNA) and T-cell sEVs (CD4, CD8, T-cell receptor proteins, miRNAs [miRs] let 7i, 101b, 21a) were compared with time-matched endomyocardial biopsy samples (n = 70) in 12 patients to postoperative day 120.

RESULTS

Six patients had 11 moderate ACR (15.7%) episodes, 1 had antibody-mediated rejection, and 5 had ≤ mild ACR. By Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, cTnT protein (P = 6.04 × 10-5) and mRNA (P = 6.87 × 10-7) were decreased with moderate ACR compared with grades 0/1 ACR. T-cell sEV CD4, CD8, and TCR protein cargoes (P ≤ 3.92 × 10-5) and miRs let 7i, 101b, and 21a (P ≤ 9.05 × 10-5) were increased with moderate ACR. Successful treatment of moderate ACR led to dynamic reversal in sEV profiles, especially donor heart sEV cTnT mRNA (Spearman coefficient 0.87) and miR 21a (coefficient 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Our first investigation in heart transplant patients demonstrated that circulating T cell-sEV and donor heart-sEV profiles enable diagnosis of moderate ACR with high diagnostic accuracy. A large sample cohort external validation study is warranted to better understand diagnostic potential of this platform for ACR monitoring in heart transplantation.

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Versus Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain and Strain-Derived Myocardial Work Indices for Identification of Heart Transplant Injury

Background/Objectives: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a marker of graft injury that increases in acute rejection and has excellent negative predictive value. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and strain-derived myocardial work indices are novel echocardiographic parameters with growing applications. Still, they have been poorly investigated in heart transplant (HTx) recipients so far. We sought to examine the diagnostic impact of left ventricular longitudinal strain-derived indices in diagnosing myocardial injury as assessed by dd-cfDNA after HTx. Methods: Since October 2022, HTx recipients have been shifted from our endomyocardial biopsy (EMB)-based rejection surveillance protocol to a monthly dd-cfDNA-led rejection assessment. We analysed the percentage of donor-derived to total cell-free DNA. For echocardiographic analysis, patient selection was restricted to those transplanted ≥ 6 months. We used 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography to assess LVGLS and strain-derived myocardial work parameters. Results: We analysed four hundred and forty-nine dd-cfDNA samples from seventy-one patients until November 2024. The mean dd-cfDNA fraction remained very low (0.13 ± 0.06%). Eighty-eight percent of surveillance EMBs that would have otherwise been performed were avoided. The mean LVGLS was lower than the literature reference values. We found no correlation between dd-cfDNA and LVGLS. Transplanted hearts had different myocardial work indices than the reference values reported in the literature. Conclusions: dd-cfDNA effectively rules out clinically significant acute rejection and decreases the need for invasive surveillance EMBs. LVGLS seems less sensitive than dd-cfDNA for the identification of myocardial injury in the early stages of HTx rejection in patients at low risk for rejection.

Surveillance donor-specific antibody and pathologic antibody-mediated rejection testing in heart transplant patients in the contemporary era

BACKGROUND

Surveillance donor-specific antibody (DSA) and pathologic antibody-mediated rejection (pAMR) testing is recommended in the first year after heart transplantation (HTx) in adult patients. Whether pAMR testing adds prognostic information to contemporary DSA testing has not been fully studied.

METHODS

This was a single-center study of consecutive endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) performed between November 2010 and February 2023 in adult HTx patients. The primary objective was to evaluate whether pAMR testing contributes additional information to DSA testing to better predict overall survival. Secondary end-points included cardiac survival and allograft dysfunction.

RESULTS

A total of 6,033 EMBs from 544 HTx patients were reviewed for the study. The pAMR+/DSA+ patients had significantly lower overall (pc = 0.013) and cardiac survival (pc = 0.002), while the pAMR+/DSA- and pAMR-/DSA+ patients showed no difference in either outcome compared to the pAMR-/DSA- group. We found significantly lower overall survival in pAMR+/DSA+ patients with allograft dysfunction (pc < 0.001) but not in pAMR+/DSA+ patients without allograft dysfunction (pc = 0.569), when compared to the pAMR-/DSA- without allograft dysfunction group. The pAMR+/DSA+ patients with cardiac allograft dysfunction accounted for 18% of deaths or cardiac retransplants while only representing 4% of the HTx cohort. Moderate or severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) also was a novel risk factor for the development of de novo DSAs (dnDSA) by 4 weeks post-HTx (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance DSA testing may effectively identify high-risk pAMR+ patients. Earlier DSA testing at 10 to 14 days post-HTx should also be considered in moderate or severe PGD patients.

Advancements in noninvasive techniques for transplant rejection: from biomarker detection to molecular imaging

Transplant rejection remains a significant barrier to the long-term success of organ transplantation. Biopsy, although considered the gold standard, is invasive, costly, and unsuitable for routine monitoring. Traditional biomarkers, such as creatinine and troponin, offer limited predictive value owing to their low specificity, and conventional imaging techniques often fail to detect early organ damage, increasing the risk of undiagnosed rejection episodes. Considering these limitations, emerging noninvasive biomarkers and molecular imaging techniques hold promise for the early and accurate detection of transplant rejection, enabling personalized management strategies. This review highlights noninvasive biomarkers that predict, diagnose, and assess transplant prognosis by reflecting graft injury, inflammation, and immune responses. For example, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is highly sensitive in detecting early graft injury, whereas gene expression profiling effectively excludes moderate-to-severe acute rejection (AR). Additionally, microRNA (miRNA) profiling enhances the diagnostic specificity for precise AR detection. Advanced molecular imaging techniques further augment the monitoring of rejection. Fluorescence imaging provides a high spatiotemporal resolution for AR grading, ultrasound offers real-time and portable monitoring, and magnetic resonance delivers high tissue contrast for anatomical assessments. Nuclear imaging modalities such as single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography, enable dynamic visualization of immune responses within transplanted organs. Notably, dd-cfDNA and nuclear medicine imaging have already been integrated into clinical practice, thereby demonstrating the translational potential of these techniques. Unlike previous reviews, this work uniquely synthesizes advancements in both noninvasive biomarkers and molecular imaging, emphasizing their complementary strengths. Biomarkers deliver molecular-level insights, whereas imaging provides spatial and temporal resolution. Together, they create a synergistic framework for comprehensive and precise transplant monitoring. By bridging these domains, this review underscores their individual contributions and collective potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, improve patient outcomes, and guide future research and clinical applications in transplant medicine.

Rejection Surveillance After Heart Transplantation: Is Paired Noninvasive Testing the New Gold Standard?

Rejection surveillance after heart transplantation has traditionally relied on numerous endomyocardial biopsies, most of which occur during the first posttransplant year. With the introduction of gene expression profiling and, more recently, donor-derived cell-free DNA, a great proportion of surveillance is being performed noninvasively with both tests. Although patients have welcomed the use of paired testing because of the decreased risk and inconvenience, interpretation of both tests can sometimes be challenging, particularly when the test results are discordant. Growing evidence from both single-center experiences and large national databases has given insights that have allowed the field to operationalize dual testing and provide physicians with algorithms to approach paired testing. The increased use of noninvasive testing has also begun to challenge the role of biopsy as the gold standard for graft monitoring, not only for rejection but over the life of the heart transplant. In a growing number of circumstances, cell-free DNA not only may be a better means of assessing rejection but could also redefine how clinicians approach the diagnosis and even treatment of graft injury. As the heart transplant community garners more experience and generates more data, the current paradigms of heart transplant surveillance will continue to be challenged.

Impact of behavior change theory-based nursing interventions on cardiac function recovery and quality of life among cardiac surgery patients with cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the impact of nursing interventions, guided by behavior change theory, on the recovery of cardiac function and quality of life in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

A total of 120 patients scheduled for CPB in the Department of Cardiology at our hospital, from February 2021 to May 2023, were enrolled. According to the study protocol, patients were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 60) or an observation group (n = 60) post-surgery. The control group received routine nursing care, while the observation group received nursing interventions based on behavior change theory, including health education, psychological support, and behavioral incentives. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. General patient data were collected from clinical records. Cardiac function was assessed using echocardiography. The wall motion score index (WMSI) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were evaluated post-care. Serum levels of inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 were measured via ELISA. Quality of life was assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, while anxiety and depression levels were evaluated using the HAM-A and HAM-D scales, respectively.

RESULTS

The baseline clinical characteristics and biochemical data of both groups were comparable (P > 0.05). The observation group showed a significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) compared to the control group (P < 0.05), while both left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) were significantly lower (P < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group had a significantly lower WMSI score and a longer 6MWD (P < 0.05). Regarding inflammatory markers, TNF-α and IL-6 levels were significantly reduced in the observation group, while IL-10 levels were significantly elevated compared to the control group (P < 0.05). In terms of quality of life, the observation group reported significantly higher scores in physical health, mental health, social relationships, and environmental factors (P < 0.05). Moreover, anxiety and depression levels were significantly lower in the observation group, as evidenced by reduced HAM-A and HAM-D scores (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Nursing care guided by behavior change theory significantly improves cardiac function and overall quality of life in patients recovering from cardiac surgery with CPB. This approach enhances LVEF, reduces left intraventricular diameter, lowers inflammatory cytokine levels, and improves mental health and social functioning. These findings underscore the importance of behavior change theory-based nursing interventions in optimizing postoperative recovery.

Patient Adapted Paternalism for Endomyocardial Biopsy Policy Changes in Heart Transplant Patients: A Mixed-Methods Study

Endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) are invasive procedures performed in heart transplant (HTx) patients for surveillance of acute rejection. However, patient preferences for replacing EMBs with noninvasive assays in the context of potential institutional policy changes are unknown. A mixed-methods design was used with 28 semi-structured patient interviews and 123 self-administered online survey questionnaires in English and Spanish between January to June 2023. Additionally, we performed semi-structured interviews with 18 HTx team members. Three dominant themes were identified: alleviating patient anxiety and distress, consistent patient-provider communication, and strong interpersonal trust with the HTx team. We found that strong interpersonal trust with the HTx team by the patients was more highly prioritized than their own opinions on whether to replace EMBs with noninvasive assays. Thus, HTx patients often considered surveillance EMBs important to their care (93%), based on the recommendations provided by their HTx team. HTx faculty physicians stated that more multicenter trials are needed prior to replacing EMBs with noninvasive assays. In conclusion, patients identified strong interpersonal trust with HTx team members to justify patient adapted paternalism, where the provider decides in accordance with the patient's situation, as their preferred shared decision-making paradigm when considering institutional policy on surveillance EMBs.

Usefulness of biomarkers to predict prognosis after heart transplant

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Heart transplant (HT) represents a major physiological stress, resulting in elevated levels of analytical biomarkers. This study aimed to determine whether changes in biomarker levels after HT can identify patients with a poor prognosis.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal noninterventional study was conducted in 149 consecutive patients undergoing HT from July 2017 to July 2023. Biomarkers were assessed before HT and at 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96hours after HT. The biomarkers analyzed were high-sensitivity troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), creatinine, and lactic acid. The primary outcome was a composite of death and severe primary graft failure (PGF).

RESULTS

NT-proBNP and troponin levels remained highly elevated throughout the period and stabilized from the first 24hours post-HT. Lactate levels stabilized after the first 24hours, and creatinine from the second day onward. Exitus occurred in 23 (15%) of the patients, and severe PGF in 26 (17%). All biomarkers were significantly associated with the incidence of the combined event (P <.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis at 24hours showed significant areas under the curve (P=.0001). The greatest discriminatory power was observed for the NT-proBNP curve. A value of 10 000 pg/mL had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant elevation of post-HT analytical biomarkers was associated with mortality and/or severe PGF. Among the biomarkers analyzed, NT-proBNP was the most accurate in classifying patients.

Ten-Year Experience with Endomyocardial Biopsy after Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: Comparison between Trans-Jugular and Trans-Femoral Approach

BACKGROUND

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is considered the gold standard for monitoring allograft rejection after heart transplantation. EMB is an invasive procedure that may be performed via a trans-jugular or a trans-femoral approach with a complication rate reported as less than 6%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complication rate after EMBs in heart recipients and to compare the results of EMBs performed via a trans-jugular or a trans-femoral approach.

METHODS

Medical records of heart recipients undergoing EMBs between January 2012 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. EMB-related complications were classified as major (death, pericardial effusion, hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade requiring a pericardiocentesis or an urgent cardiac surgery, ventricular arrythmias, permanent atrio-ventricular block requiring permanent pacing, hemothorax, pneumothorax and retroperitoneal bleeding) and minor (de novo tricuspid regurgitation, arrhythmias, coronary artery fistula, vascular access site complications).

RESULTS

A total of 1698 EMBs were performed during the study period at our institution in 212 heart recipients. There were 927 (55%) EMBs performed through a trans-jugular approach (TJ group) and 771 (45%) EMBs performed through a trans-femoral approach (TF group). A total of 60 (3.5%) complications were recorded, including nine (0.5%) major complications (six cardiac tamponades, two pneumothorax and one retroperitoneal bleeding) and 51 (3%) minor complications (seven coronary fistulae, five de novo tricuspid regurgitation, four supraventricular arrythmias and thirty-five vascular access site complications). No difference was found in total (38 [4%] vs. 22 [3%]; p = 0.16) and major (6 [1%} vs. 3 [0.4%]; p = 0.65) complications (32 [3%] vs. 19 [2%]; p = 0.23) between the TJ group and the TF group. No difference was found in male sex, age at time of EMB and time from HT between complicated and not complicated EMBs.

CONCLUSIONS

EMBs represent a safe procedure with a low risk of complications. In our experience, EMBs performed via a trans-jugular approach are as safe as the trans-femoral approach.

Circulating T cell specific extracellular vesicle profiles in cardiac allograft acute cellular rejection

There is a critical need for biomarkers of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in organ transplantation. We hypothesized that ACR leads to changes in donor-reactive T cell small extracellular vesicle (sEV) profiles in transplant recipient circulation that match the kinetics of alloreactive T cell activation. In rodent heart transplantation, circulating T cell sEV quantities (P < .0001) and their protein and mRNA cargoes showed time-specific expression of alloreactive and regulatory markers heralding early ACR in allogeneic transplant recipients but not in syngeneic transplant recipients. Next generation sequencing of their microRNA cargoes identified novel candidate biomarkers of ACR, which were validated by stem loop quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (n = 10). Circulating T cell sEVs enriched from allogeneic transplant recipients mediated targeted cytotoxicity of donor cardiomyocytes by apoptosis assay (P < .0001). Translation of the concept and EV methodologies to clinical heart transplantation demonstrated similar upregulation of circulating T cell sEV profiles at time points of grade 2 ACR (n = 3 patients). Furthermore, T cell receptor sequencing of T cell sEV mRNA cargo demonstrated expression of T cell clones with intact complementarity determining region 3 signals. These data support the diagnostic potential of T cell sEVs as noninvasive biomarker of ACR and suggest their potential functional roles.

The Exercise aNd hEArt transplant (ENEA) trial - a registry-based randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of cardiac telerehabilitation after heart transplant

BACKGROUND

Heart transplant (HTx) is gold-standard therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a multidisciplinary intervention shown to improve cardiovascular prognosis and quality of life. The aim in this randomized controlled trial is to explore the safety and efficacy of cardiac telerehabilitation after HTx. In addition, biomarkers of rehabilitation outcomes will be identified, as data that will enable treatment to be tailored to patient phenotype.

METHODS

Patients after HTx will be recruited at IRCCS S. Maria Nascente - Fondazione Don Gnocchi, Milan, Italy (n = 40). Consenting participants will be randomly allocated to either of two groups (1:1): an intervention group who will receive on-site CR followed by 12 weeks of telerehabilitation, or a control group who will receive on-site CR followed by standard homecare and exercise programme. Recruitment began on 20th May 2023 and is expected to continue until 20th May 2025. Socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle, health status, cardiovascular events, cognitive function, anxiety and depression symptoms, and quality of life will be assessed, as well as exercise capacity and muscular endurance. Participants will be evaluated before the intervention, post-CR and after 6 months. In addition, analysis of circulating extracellular vesicles using Surface Plasmon Resonance imaging (SPRi), based on a rehabilomic approach, will be applied to both groups pre- and post-CR.

CONCLUSION

This study will explore the safety and efficacy of cardiac telerehabilitation after HTx. In addition, a rehabilomic approach will be used to investigate biomolecular phenotypization in HTx patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05824364.

De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies after Heart Transplantation: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Antibodies directed against donor-specific human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) can be detected de novo after heart transplantation and play a key role in long-term survival. De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) have been associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy, antibody-mediated rejection, and mortality. Advances in detection methods and international guideline recommendations have encouraged the adoption of screening protocols among heart transplant units. However, there is still a lack of consensus about the correct course of action after dnDSA detection. Treatment is usually started when antibody-mediated rejection is present; however, some dnDSAs appear years before graft failure is detected, and at this point, damage may be irreversible. In particular, class II, anti-HLA-DQ, complement binding, and persistent dnDSAs have been associated with worse outcomes. Growing evidence points towards a more aggressive management of dnDSA. For that purpose, better diagnostic tools are needed in order to identify subclinical graft injury. Cardiac magnetic resonance, strain techniques, or coronary physiology parameters could provide valuable information to identify patients at risk. Treatment of dnDSA usually involves plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, immunoadsorption, and ritxumab, but the benefit of these therapies is still controversial. Future efforts should focus on establishing effective treatment protocols in order to improve long-term survival of heart transplant recipients.

The utilization of molecular microscope in management of heart transplant recipients in the era of noninvasive monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Monitoring for graft rejection is a fundamental tenet of post-transplant follow-up. In heart transplantation (HT) in particular, rejection has been traditionally assessed with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). EMB has potential complications and noted limitations, including interobserver variability in interpretation. Additional tests, such as basic cardiac biomarkers, cardiac imaging, gene expression profiling (GEP) scores, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and the novel molecular microscope diagnostic system (MMDx) have become critical tools in rejection surveillance beyond standard EMB.

METHODS

This paper describes an illustrative case followed by a review of MMDx within the context of other noninvasive screening modalities for rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest MMDx be used to assist with early detection of rejection in cases of discordance between EMB and other noninvasive studies.

Rejection! Or is it? Correlation among molecular microscope diagnostic system, histopathology and clinical judgement following heart transplantation

PURPOSE

Little is known about clinical decision making among discordant findings concerning for rejection with endomyocardial biopsy (EMBx) and Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) in patients following heart transplantation.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-eight corresponding EMBx and MMDx specimens from 135 adult heart transplant patients were retrospectively reviewed. Rejection was classified as t-cell mediated rejection ≥2R and/or antibody mediated rejection ≥1. Clinical decision making among concordant and discordant cases of EMBx and MMDx results were reviewed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable between concordant and discordant patient groups (median age 60 yrs., 76% male, and 71% White). A total of 167/228 specimens (73%) were concordant for no rejection with 98% agreement in clinical decision making and 25/228 (11%) concordant for rejection with 64% agreement in clinical decision making. Among the 36/228 (16%) discordant samples, clinical decision-making agreed on treatment for rejection in five of the MMDx samples and three of the EMBx samples.

CONCLUSIONS

MMDx can be an additional tool to diagnose rejection not detected by the traditional EMBx and influence clinical decision making in guiding appropriate treatment. Ongoing investigation into the clinical utility of MMDx is warranted to determine the significance of discordant findings among diagnostic modalities when assessing for rejection.

Banff Human Organ Transplant Consensus Gene Panel for the Detection of Antibody Mediated Rejection in Heart Allograft Biopsies

The molecular refinement of the diagnosis of heart allograft rejection based on whole-transcriptome analyses faces several hurdles that greatly limit its widespread clinical application. The targeted Banff Human Organ Transplant gene panel (B-HOT, including 770 genes of interest) has been developed to facilitate reproducible and cost-effective gene expression analysis of solid organ allografts. We aimed to determine in silico the ability of this targeted panel to capture the antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) molecular profile using whole-transcriptome data from 137 heart allograft biopsies (71 biopsies reflecting the entire landscape of histologic AMR, 66 non-AMR control biopsies including cellular rejection and non-rejection cases). Differential gene expression, pathway and network analyses demonstrated that the B-HOT panel captured biologically and clinically relevant genes (IFNG-inducible, NK-cells, injury, monocytes-macrophage, B-cell-related genes), pathways (interleukin and interferon signaling, neutrophil degranulation, immunoregulatory interactions, endothelial activation) and networks reflecting the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the AMR process previously identified in whole-transcriptome analysis. Our findings support the potential clinical use of the B-HOT-gene panel as a reliable proxy to whole-transcriptome analysis for the gene expression profiling of cardiac allograft rejection.

Selection and Interpretation of Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Transplantation

The number of heart transplants performed annually in the United States and worldwide continues to increase, but there has been little change in graft longevity and patient survival over the past 2 decades. The reference standard for diagnosis of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection includes histologic and immunofluorescence evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy samples, despite invasiveness and high interrater variability for grading histologic rejection. Circulating biomarkers and molecular diagnostics have shown substantial predictive value in rejection monitoring, and emerging data support their use in diagnosing other posttransplant complications. The use of genomic (cell-free DNA), transcriptomic (mRNA and microRNA profiling), and proteomic (protein expression quantitation) methodologies in diagnosis of these posttransplant outcomes has been evaluated with varying levels of evidence. In parallel, growing knowledge about the genetically mediated immune response leading to rejection (immunogenetics) has enhanced understanding of antibody-mediated rejection, associated graft dysfunction, and death. Antibodies to donor human leukocyte antigens and the technology available to evaluate these antibodies continues to evolve. This review aims to provide an overview of biomarker and immunologic tests used to diagnose posttransplant complications. This includes a discussion of pediatric heart transplantation and the disparate rates of rejection and death experienced by Black patients receiving a heart transplant. This review describes diagnostic modalities that are available and used after transplant and the landscape of future investigations needed to enhance patient outcomes after heart transplantation.