Biologics for severe asthma: The real-world evidence, effectiveness of switching, and prediction factors for the efficacy

Therapeutic potential of Platycodin D in allergic asthma through anti-inflammatory and anti-remodeling effects

BACKGROUND

Allergic asthma (AA) is a prevalent chronic respiratory disease characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and chronic inflammation, significantly impairing patients' quality of life.

PURPOSE

This study investigates the therapeutic effects of Platycodin D (PLD) on AA and its underlying mechanisms via the EGFR/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

METHODS

In vitro, BEAS-2B cells treated with IL-4 and IL-13 simulated asthma's inflammatory environment. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assessed PLD's modulation of inflammatory factors, while Western blot (WB) analyzed its impact on airway remodeling proteins. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)-derived airway organoids (AOs) were used to evaluate PLD's effects on airway remodeling, observed through tissue staining and immunofluorescence. In vivo, an OVA-induced asthma mouse model was employed to assess PLD's therapeutic potential via lung function tests, serum biochemical analysis, and histopathology. Network pharmacology and transcriptomics predicted and validated PLD's target pathways.

RESULTS

In vivo experiments demonstrated that PLD significantly alleviated airway inflammation and remodeling in OVA-induced asthmatic mice. Specifically, treatment with 5 mg/kg PLD significantly reduced the number of inflammatory cells recovered from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) compared to the model group (p < 0.05). Serum levels of IgE, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-17A were markedly decreased following PLD treatment (p < 0.05). PLD also improved lung function by reducing airway resistance (RL) across all tested methacholine concentrations, with significant reductions at 5, 10, and 20 mg/mL doses (p < 0.05). Histological analysis revealed that PLD attenuated pathological changes in lung tissues, including goblet cell hyperplasia and collagen deposition. Western blot analysis confirmed that PLD significantly downregulated the expression of COL1A1 and α-SMA in lung tissues (p < 0.05), suggesting suppression of airway remodeling. In vitro, PLD inhibited the expression of IL-6, IL-8, COL1A1, and α-SMA in human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells in a dose-dependent manner. Transcriptomic sequencing and RT-qPCR analysis further demonstrated that PLD downregulated key genes involved in the EGFR/PI3K/Akt pathway. Molecular docking showed high binding affinity between PLD and EGFR/PI3K proteins, supporting a potential mechanistic link.

CONCLUSION

PLD exerts therapeutic effects in allergic asthma by suppressing airway inflammation, improving lung function, and inhibiting airway remodeling. These effects are associated with the inhibition of the EGFR/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Our findings suggest that PLD may serve as a promising candidate for the treatment of allergic airway diseases.

Exploring factors associated with clinical remission in patients with severe asthma receiving anti-IL-4Rα, anti-IL-5/5R, or anti-IgE treatment

BACKGROUND

The optimal selection of biologics is critical for achieving clinical remission (CR) in patients with severe asthma. This real-world study examined baseline prebiologic factors associated with CR in patients with severe asthma receiving anti-IL-4Rα, anti-IL-5/5R, or anti-IgE treatment.

METHODS

This Japanese multicenter retrospective observational study included consecutive patients with severe asthma whose spirometry and asthma control test (ACT) data were available after at least 1 year of anti-IL-4Rα, anti-IL-5/5R, or anti-IgE treatment. The 3-domain CR was defined based on no maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, no exacerbation in the previous year, and ACT ≥23. The 4-domain CR was defined based on no OCS, no exacerbation, ACT ≥20, and percentage-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s ≥ 80 %.

RESULTS

A total of 236 patients with severe asthma were included (n = 81, 104, and 51 for the anti-IL-4Rα, anti-IL-5/5R, and anti-IgE treatment groups, respectively). The rates of 3- and 4-domain CR were 28-47 % and 22-36 %, respectively. In the multivariate models, the presence of chronic rhinosinusitis and higher FeNO levels were associated with 3-domain CR in patients receiving anti-IL-4Rα treatment but not in those receiving anti-IL-5/5R or anti-IgE treatment after adjusting for baseline OCS use, past-year exacerbation history, body mass index, sex, and disease duration. Moreover, higher FeNO levels were associated with 4-domain CR in patients receiving anti-IL-4Rα treatment after adjustment for the same variables.

CONCLUSION

Anti-IL-4Rα treatment may be effective for patients with severe asthma who have chronic rhinosinusitis or high FeNO levels at baseline.

Exploring the pathogenesis and clinical implications of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma-COPD overlap (ACO): a narrative review

The complexity and diversity of the immune response in patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma-COPD overlap present significant challenges for disease management. Relying on a limited number of biomarkers and clinical data is insufficient to fully reveal the immunopathogenesis of these diseases. However, in vitro technologies such as cell analysis, cytokine investigation, and nucleic acid sequencing have provided new insights into the underlying mechanisms of these diseases, leading to the discovery of several biomarkers-including cell degranulation, cell function, secreted cytokines, and single nucleotide polymorphisms-that have potential clinical implications. This paper reviews the immunopathogenesis in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma-COPD overlap and examines the applications of recent in vitro models to detect candidate biomarkers that could enhance diagnostic precision, predict severity, monitor treatments, and develop new treatment strategies. A deeper understanding of the immune response in these diseases, along with the integration of in vitro models into clinical practice, could greatly improve the management of these respiratory diseases, making approaches more personalized and efficient.

The clinical and pathological histology efficacy of biological therapy for severe asthma with a phenotype of type 2 inflammation - systematic review

Asthma is a complex, chronic inflammatory condition of the airways that comes in many forms. Because different inflammatory processes drive it, we can generally categorize asthma into two main types: type 2 inflammatory asthma and non-type 2 inflammatory asthma. Type 2 inflammation is usually the culprit in most folks grappling with severe asthma. There is a noticeable difference in the treatment approaches for different phenotypes of severe asthma. The main reason is that patients suffering from type 2 inflammatory asthma can respond well to treatment with biological agents. Several well-verified biological agents, such as anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibodies, anti-interleukin (IL)-4 monoclonal antibodies, anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies, and anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) monoclonal antibodies, have shown outstanding effectiveness. They can significantly alleviate asthma exacerbations, lower the number of eosinophils, improve pulmonary function, decrease the dependence on oral corticosteroids, and elevate the quality of life for patients with asthma. This discourse meticulously evaluates the therapeutic prowess of biological agents in the treatment and control of severe asthma, concurrently investigating their impact on histological indices, to highlight the crucial role of precision medicine in the strategic concatenation of therapy for this refractory malady.

Evaluation of Long-Term Response to Biological Therapy in Severe Asthma and Considerations for Treatment Adjustment

Assessing long-term responses to biological therapies for severe asthma is critical for optimizing patient management and improving clinical outcomes [...].

Effectiveness of benralizumab in the Tokyo Asthma Study (TOAST): A real-world prospective interventional trial

BACKGROUND

Biologics are integral in the management of severe asthma. As the effectiveness of the anti-IL-5 receptor antibody benralizumab in Japan remains elusive, this study aimed to assess its real-world effectiveness in Japanese patients with severe asthma.

METHODS

This prospective, interventional, single-arm clinical trial was conducted across ten facilities in Japan between September 2020 and July 2022. Adult patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (peripheral blood eosinophil count ≥150 cells/μl) were enrolled and treated with benralizumab. The primary endpoint was the change in ACQ-5 score from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

Of 103 patients, 98 (mean age: 62.1 years, women: 55.1 %, regular oral corticosteroids [OCS] treatment: 20.4 %) were included in the analysis. From baseline to week 24, benralizumab significantly improved ACQ-5 (-0.67, 95 % CI: -0.94 to -0.39) and AQLQ (0.71, 95 % CI: 0.46 to 0.96) scores with an increase in FEV1 (87 ml, 95 % CI: 15-159 ml). The maintenance OCS dose and the percentage of OCS users decreased from 13.9 mg/day to 6.0 mg/day and from 20.4 % to 9.2 %, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified baseline blood eosinophil count (≥400 cells/μl) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (≥22 ppb) as independent predictors of therapeutic response to benralizumab. Benralizumab treatment was discontinued due to nonserious adverse events and patient choice in four and three patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting in Japan, patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab demonstrated substantial improvements in asthma control, quality of life, and respiratory function with reduced OCS usage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031190237).

Response to IL-5/IL-5R Antagonists and Remission Rate in Patients With Severe Asthma Who Would Have Been Excluded From the Pivotal Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of IL-5/IL-5R antagonists showed a significant reduction in asthma exacerbations as well as a corticosteroid-sparing effect in selected patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the response and remission rate after treatment with IL-5/IL-5R antagonists in patients with asthma who would or would not have met inclusion criteria of pivotal RCTs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma aged 18 and older treated with IL-5/IL-5R antagonists between 2012 and 2020 in a tertiary outpatient asthma clinic. Patients aged 75 years or younger, with a smoking history of less than 10 pack-years and a reversible FEV1 less than 80% predicted in the previous year were considered to fulfill the pivotal RCT inclusion criteria. Response to treatment and clinical remission of asthma were assessed in those who did or did not fulfill pivotal RCT inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 108 subjects were included. Only 22 patients (20.4%) met all pivotal RCT inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in response to treatment of these patients compared with those who did not fulfill inclusion criteria (odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.66 [0.15-2.85]). However, RCT eligibility was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving clinical remission (odds ratio [95% CI] = 4.09 [1.02-16.45]).

CONCLUSION

IL-5/IL-5R antagonists seem to be as effective in subjects who would have been excluded from pivotal RCTs as in those who met the RCT inclusion criteria, but RCT eligibility increases the likelihood of achieving clinical remission of asthma.

Real-World Biologic Use Patterns in Severe Asthma, 2015-2021: The CLEAR Study

Background

Biologics targeting immunoglobulin E, interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 or IL-5 signaling are effective at treating severe asthma; however, individual patients' responses may be suboptimal, leading to therapy switching or stopping. The CLEAR study aimed to assess real-world biologic use patterns and associated clinical outcomes in patients receiving care for severe asthma.

Methods

CLEAR was a multicenter, observational study that included adults (≥18 years old) from 23 countries enrolled in the International Severe Asthma Registry between December 2015 and August 2021. Patients who initiated biologic therapy were categorized as continuing the initial biologic for 6 months, switching to another biologic within 6 months or stopping biologic treatment within 6 months. Outcomes were assessed using the closest available data to 12 months after biologic initiation, using propensity score-weighted multivariable regression models.

Results

Among 1,859 patients who initiated biologic therapy, 1,116 (60.0%) continued, 474 (25.5%) switched and 269 (14.5%) stopped treatment. Patients who switched or stopped therapy had a higher annualized asthma exacerbation rate post-initiation than those who continued (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] [95% confidence interval]: switched, 1.83 [1.51, 2.22]; stopped, 1.53 [1.19, 1.95]) and were more likely to have uncontrolled asthma at last assessment (adjusted odds ratio: switched, 5.40 [3.12, 9.33]; stopped, 4.02 [2.32, 6.98]). Compared with those who continued therapy, patients who switched had a higher long-term daily oral corticosteroid dose (adjusted β: 3.77 [1.71, 4.37] mg) and higher rates of hospitalizations (aIRR: 2.58 [1.52, 4.37]) and emergency room visits (aIRR: 2.12 [1.39, 3.24]).

Conclusion

Switching or stopping biologic therapy was associated with worse clinical outcomes than continuing the initial therapy.

Efficacy of omalizumab after discontinuation: a retrospective single-center observational study in children with severe asthma

Introduction

Several trials documented safety and efficacy of omalizumab, but there are a few data about its effects after discontinuation. This study aims to evaluate the maintenance of efficacy of omalizumab in pediatric asthmatic patients one year after its suspension.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 17 subjects aged 6-18 years, divided into two groups: Group A (9 patients) who discontinued omalizumab after 18 months, and Group B (8 patients) who continued the therapy. Data on respiratory function (FEV1%), the number of exacerbations, need for hospitalizations, use of oral corticosteroids, and Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores were collected and analyzed at three time points: baseline (T0), after 18 months of treatment (T1), and 36 months (T2).

Results

In Group A, significant differences were observed between T0 and T1, and T1 and T2, in FEV1% values, the number of exacerbations, the need for oral corticosteroids, and ACT scores. Group B showed significant differences in these parameters over time, with a notable reduction in exacerbations and improvement in ACT scores. The comparative analysis revealed that Group B had a higher number of exacerbations compared to Group A at T0 and greater use of oral cortico-steroids at T1. By T2, Group A had a higher ACT score than Group B at T0, whereas Group B showed higher ACT scores at T2 compared to Group A.

Discussion

The study confirmed the efficacy and safety of omalizumab, with its benefits persisting one year after treatment discontinuation in terms of lung function, reduction in exacerbations, decreased need for oral corticosteroids, and improved quality of life. Further research is necessary.

Retrospective Cohort Study of Elderly Users of Single- or Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy for the Treatment of Asthma in the USA

INTRODUCTION

Escalation to single- or multiple-inhaler triple therapy (SITT; MITT) is a recommended option for patients with asthma who remain uncontrolled by medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist; however, characterization of elderly users of triple therapy is limited. This real-world cohort study describes demographics and clinical characteristics of elderly patients with asthma with and without comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who are new users of triple therapy, and asthma treatment patterns preceding triple therapy initiation.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database. Eligible patients were ≥ 65 years of age with asthma or with asthma and comorbid COPD who initiated either triple therapy with single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI; 100/62.5/25 μg) or MITT between September 18, 2017 and September 30, 2020. Demographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, healthcare costs, and asthma treatment patterns were described in the 12-month period before triple therapy initiation (baseline period).

RESULTS

In total, 15,557 patients were included. Among FF/UMEC/VI initiators with asthma (N = 635) mean age was 73.3 years and 66.6% were female. During the baseline period, > 75% of patients used controller therapy, > 92% used rescue medications, 27.9% experienced ≥ 1 asthma-related exacerbation, with mean annual exacerbation rate of 0.42, and mean all-cause healthcare costs were $23,407. Patients with asthma initiating MITT and patients with asthma and comorbid COPD initiating FF/UMEC/VI or MITT had similar characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, healthcare costs, and asthma treatment patterns to FF/UMEC/VI initiators with asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple therapy is often initiated following use of other asthma controller medications in real-world practice. Substantial rescue medication use and high disease and economic burden among this elderly patient population suggest that their asthma was not adequately controlled prior to triple therapy initiation. This retrospective study provides an early profile of elderly patients with asthma in the USA.

[Severe eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis-related peripheral neuropathy after the cessation of mepolizumab. A case report]

A 78-years-old man was treated for asthma and pansinusitis for >5 years, and mepolizumab was initiated two years previously. Two months after the cessation of mepolizumab treatment, the asthma symptoms worsened and acute progressive muscle weakness and sensory disturbance developed. On day 8 after the onset of weakness and hypoesthesia, the patient presented with complete flaccid tetraplegia and diffuse hypoesthesia of all extremities, without paresthesia or pain, and was admitted to our hospital. Blood tests revealed eosinophilia without anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody elevation. Nerve conduction studies revealed severe axonal polyneuropathy and multifocal absent F-waves. Cerebrospinal fluid was normal. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) were suspected, and high-dose methylprednisolone was administered, followed by oral prednisolone. Eosinophils rapidly disappeared; however, the neurological symptoms did not improve. On day 16, sural nerve biopsy revealed myelinated fiber loss in most of the fibers in every nerve bundle regardless of fiber size, while eosinophilic infiltration in the epineurium and findings suggestive of necrotizing vasculitis were not observed. The results did not fulfill the pathological criteria for EGPA but supported the changes in vasculitis; hence, EGPA was diagnosed. Intravenous immunoglobulin, azathioprine, and rituximab were administered, and the prednisolone dose was gradually reduced to 10 ‍mg/d. The eosinophil count increased to 50/μl without pneumonia recurrence or worsening asthma. Neuropathy in the upper limbs gradually improved over two years, whereas that in the lower limbs did not change. This is the first reported case of sequential exacerbation of asthma and onset of EGPA after mepolizumab discontinuation. Among patients with asthma, the cessation of mepolizumab treatment may lead to the development of EGPA with an atypical clinical course, such as rapidly progressive severe neuropathy mimicking GBS.

A comparison of the impact of anti-IL5/5r therapies in allergic versus non-allergic patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in a real-life setting

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of allergic patients (AP) and non-allergic patients (NAP) with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) treated with anti-IL5/IL5R biologic agents (mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab) over one year. Sub-analyses assessed treatment response variations between AP and NAP based on the biological used and compared outcomes among AP with and without fungal allergy.

METHODS

Observational retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, pulmonary function tests, Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, oral corticosteroid (OCS) usage, and exacerbation frequency were assessed at the initiation of biological treatment and after one year.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with SEA were included, 41 AP and 24 NAP. 55.4% were treated with mepolizumab, 33.8% with benralizumab, and 10.8% with reslizumab. Before anti-IL5/5R treatment, AP had worse baseline outcomes but there were no differences in pulmonary function. Mean annual exacerbation rate and percentage of patients requiring OCS and dose of prednisone were higher in AP than NAP. AP had significantly higher total IgE values. After one year of treatment, more AP discontinued OCS than NAP (p = 0.025). Both experienced a significant reduction in exacerbation frequency (p = 0.001) and improved respiratory function. 70.7% of AP and 60% of NAP improved ACT ≥3 points. There was no significant difference between AP and NAP using mepolizumab (p = 0.145) or benralizumab (p = 0.174) in reducing OCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-IL5/IL5R reduced the need for OCS and improved asthma control, regardless of allergic status. Fungal allergy led to lower ACT scores and higher exacerbations than other allergens; both groups improved with anti-IL5/ILR.

Progress in research on induced sputum in asthma: a narrative review

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical significance of induced sputum in asthma through a retrospective analysis of induced sputum in patients with asthma.

DATA SOURCES

The data and references cited in this article were obtained from PubMed, Sci-Hub, and Web of Science.

STUDY SELECTION

Observational studies with reliable data were selected.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytological count, -omics, and pathogen detection of induced sputum are helpful for the clinical diagnosis of asthma and in guiding medication choices.

Biologics in severe asthma: a state-of-the-art review

Asthma is considered severe if it remains uncontrolled despite optimal conventional therapy, characterised by poor symptom control, frequent exacerbations and increased exposure to systemic corticosteroids. This has a significant impact on morbidity, mortality and healthcare resource utilisation. Recent advances in the understanding of asthma heterogeneity and immunopathogenesis have helped delineate precise disease pathways. The discovery of these pivotal pathways has led to the development of highly effective biologic therapies. Currently available asthma biologics target immunoglobulin E, interleukin (IL)-5/IL-5Rα, IL-4Rα and thymic stromal lymphopoietin. Identification of specific asthma phenotypes, utilising easily measurable biomarkers, has paved the way towards personalised and precision asthma management. Biologic therapies play a significant role in reducing exacerbations, hospitalisations and the need for maintenance systemic steroids, while also improving the quality of life in patients with severe asthma. The evidence for their clinical efficacy comes from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), extension studies, metanalyses and real-world data. This review synthesises findings from early, pivotal RCTs and subsequent studies following the approval of biologics for severe asthma. The safety and efficacy data from these studies, completed in a variety of settings, provide practical perspectives on their application and enhance their generalisability.

Factors associated with uncontrolled severe asthma in the biologic era

BACKGROUND

Despite the development of biologics for severe asthma, individuals with uncontrolled status persist, posing a significant social problem. This multicenter prospective study aimed to identify factors associated with the uncontrolled status of patients with severe asthma in the biologic era assessed using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ).

METHODS

Subjects with severe asthma diagnosed by respiratory specialists were enrolled from 11 hospitals. Clinical data and questionnaires were collected. We compared controlled (ACQ-5 <1.5) with uncontrolled severe asthma (ACQ-5 ≥1.5) and assessed factors linked to uncontrolled severe asthma using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four patients were analyzed (median age, 66 years; 62.3 % female; 52.6 % administered biologics). Among them, 56 patients (36.4 %) had uncontrolled severe asthma (ACQ-5 ≥1.5). The uncontrolled group had more frequent exacerbations (≥2 times in the previous year) and elevated blood neutrophil counts compared with the controlled group. Factors associated with uncontrolled status were analyzed in the overall population, with patients stratified into two groups: those receiving biologics and those not receiving biologics. Multivariate analysis revealed that frequent exacerbations and elevated blood neutrophil counts were associated with uncontrolled status in the overall population and in patients without biologics, whereas elevated blood neutrophil counts were significantly associated with uncontrolled status in patients receiving biologics.

CONCLUSION

Elevated blood neutrophil counts and frequent exacerbations were independently associated with uncontrolled severe asthma. Specifically, elevated blood neutrophil counts were a significant factor related to uncontrolled status irrespective of biologics, suggesting their potential utility as a biomarker in the biologic era.

Endotyping in Chronic Rhinosinusitis-An EAACI Task Force Report

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a clinical syndrome defined by typical sinonasal symptoms persisting for at least 12 weeks. CRS is divided into two distinct phenotypes, CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and without (CRSsNP). The aim of the review is to provide an update on the current knowledge in CRS endotypes. The prevailing hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis of CRS suggests that dysfunctional interactions between the host and environmental stressors at the mucosal surface drive the diverse inflammatory mechanisms. Genetic and epigenetic variations in the mucosal immune system are believed to play a significant role in the pathomechanisms of CRS. Various environmental agents (such as microbes and irritants) have been implicated in CRS. In a healthy state, the sinonasal mucosa acts as a barrier, modulating environmental stimulation and mounting appropriate immune responses against pathogens with minimal tissue damage. Different endotypes may exist based on the specific mechanistic pathways driving the chronic tissue inflammation of CRS. There is a need to understand endotypes in order to better predict, diagnose, and treat CRS. This literature review provides an update on the role of the endotypes in CRS and the limitations of endotyping CRS in clinical practice. Understanding of the pathogenesis and optimal management of CRS has progressed significantly in the last decades; however, there still are several unmet needs in endotype research.

Improvement in health-related quality of life questionnaires with biologic treatment in severe asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis: a real-life experience

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe asthma frequently have comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with or without nasal polyps, that can increase the symptom burden and complicate treatment. Real-life clinical data on the impact of biologic treatments on CRS-specific quality-of-life questionnaires are still lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective real-life study, we collected data from patients with severe asthma with comorbid CRS with/without nasal polyposis at baseline, and after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment with omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab or dupilumab. In particular, we evaluated improvements in HRQoL as measured by SinoNasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22, 0 - 110), Visual Analog Scale symptom scores (VAS, 0-10), and Asthma Control Test (ACT, 5-25) and the proportion of patients meeting the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

Disease-specific HRQoL, as measured by SNOT 22 and VAS score improved in all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment compared with baseline (SNOT-22: 14, IQR: 0-52 vs 10, IQR:0-30 vs 0, IQR:0-15 vs 0, IQR:0-12, p < 0.001, VAS score: 1, IQR: 0-5 vs 0, IQR:0-3 vs 0, IQR:0-2 vs 0, IQR 0-1, p < 0.001). After 3 months of treatment >80% of patients reached the MCID for ACT, while only patients on dupilumab showed to reach a MCID in 100% of cases. The effect size depended upon the symptom burden at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms the efficacy of omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in a real-life setting, with a rapid improvement in CRS-specific HRQoL and general health status. These data highlight the importance of targeting type 2 inflammation in asthmatic patients with co-existing upper and lower airways disease.The Authors disclose that preliminary data and analysis of the present study have been presented in abstract form during the "X International Workshop on Lung Health - Respiratory Disease and Immune Response", held in Nice on 19-21 January 2023.

Clinical characteristics of complete responders versus non-complete responders to omalizumab, benralizumab and mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma: a long-term retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Some patients with severe asthma may benefit from treatment with biologics, but evidence has been mostly collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which patients' characteristics are different from those encountered in asthma patients in the real-world setting. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features of complete responders versus non-complete responders to long-term treatment with biologics in patients with severe asthma attended in routine daily practice.

METHODS

Data of a cohort of 90 patients with severe asthma who were treated with biologics (omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab) for at least 12 months and were followed up to March 2022. Data recorded included clinical characteristics and effectiveness of treatment (exacerbation, Asthma Control Test [ACT] score, lung function, use of maintenance oral corticosteroids [mOCS]), FeNO, and blood eosinophils at baseline, at 12 months, and at the end of follow-up. Complete response is considered if, in addition to not presenting exacerbations or the use of mOCS, the ACT score was >20 and, the FEV1 >80% predicted.

RESULTS

An improvement in all asthma control parameters was observed after 12 months of treatment and a mean follow-up of 55 months. After 12 months of treatment 27.2% of patients met the criteria of complete response and this percentage even increased to 35.3% at the end of follow-up. Long-term complete response was associated to better lung function with mepolizumab and omalizumab treatment and to less previous exacerbations in the benralizumab group. The main cause of not achieving a complete response was the persistence of an airflow obstructive pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab improved the clinical outcomes of patients with severe asthma in a clinic environment with similar effect sizes to RCTs in the long term follow-up. Airflow obstruction, however, was a predictor of a non-complete response to biologics.

A protocol for a Japanese prospective cohort evaluating the features of patients with uncontrolled asthma achieving clinical remission: J-CIRCLE

BACKGROUND

Increasing expectations that biologics can be used as disease-modifying agents have introduced the concept of clinical remission (CR) in managements of severe asthma. Given the clinical relevance of computed tomography (CT) and blood biomarkers, we hypothesized that further refinement of CR criteria as well as incorporation of CT and blood biomarkers as indicators for structural and biological remission (SR, BR) would enable predicting long-term disease stability in patients with severe asthma treated with biologics.

METHODS

This Japanese multicenter prospective observational cohort will enroll patients with severe asthma who will start a new biologic (including a change from another biologic). The enrolled patients will be longitudinally followed up for 3 years. At enrollment, patients will undergo postbronchodilator spirometry, blood tests, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, chest and sinus CT, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Follow-up examinations will be performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. The rates of CR resulting from different criteria after 1 year of treatment with biologics will be compared, and factors associated with long-term disease stability after 3 years of biologic treatments will be identified.

DISCUSSION

This multicenter study in Japan will provide data that will help establish more appropriate criteria for CR, structural remission, and biological remission to predict long-term disease stability in patients with severe asthma who receive biologic therapy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto University (No. R4419, approval date June 11th, 2024).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000053771).

Lung imaging in COPD and asthma

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are common lung diseases with heterogeneous clinical presentations. Lung imaging allows evaluations of underlying pathophysiological changes and provides additional personalized approaches for disease management. This narrative review provides an overview of recent advances in chest imaging analysis using various modalities, such as computed tomography (CT), dynamic chest radiography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Visual CT assessment localizes emphysema subtypes and mucus plugging in the airways. Dedicated software quantifies the severity and spatial distribution of emphysema and the airway tree structure, including the central airway wall thickness, branch count and fractal dimension of the tree, and airway-to-lung size ratio. Nonrigid registration of inspiratory and expiratory CT scans quantifies small airway dysfunction, local volume changes and shape deformations in specific regions. Lung ventilation and diaphragm movement are also evaluated on dynamic chest radiography. Functional MRI detects regional oxygen transfer across the alveolus using inhaled oxygen and ventilation defects and gas diffusion into the alveolar-capillary barrier tissue and red blood cells using inhaled hyperpolarized 129Xe gas. These methods have the potential to determine local functional properties in the lungs that cannot be detected by lung function tests in patients with COPD and asthma. Further studies are needed to apply these technologies in clinical practice, particularly for early disease detection and tailor-made interventions, such as the efficient selection of patients likely to respond to biologics. Moreover, research should focus on the extension of healthy life expectancy in patients at higher risk and with established diseases.

Disease Burden and Access to Biologic Therapy in Patients with Severe Asthma, 2017-2022: An Analysis of the International Severe Asthma Registry

Introduction

Patients with severe asthma may be prescribed biologic therapies to improve disease control. The EVEREST study aimed to characterize the global disease burden of patients with severe asthma without access to biologics and those who have access but do not receive biologics, as well as the remaining unmet need despite use of these therapies.

Methods

This was a historical cohort study of patients with severe asthma (aged ≥18 years) in the International Severe Asthma Registry receiving Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2018 step 5 treatment, or with uncontrolled disease at GINA step 4. Prospective data on patient clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and medication use over a 12-month period between December 2017 and May 2022 were assessed for the following five groups: biologics accessible (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, or dupilumab); biologics inaccessible; biologics accessible but not received; biologics accessible and received; and biologic recipients whose asthma remained suboptimally controlled.

Results

Overall, 9587 patients from 21 countries were included. Among patients in the biologics accessible (n=5073), biologics inaccessible (n=3041), and biologics accessible but not received (n=382) groups, 41.4%, 18.7%, and 49.6% experienced at least two exacerbations, 11.5%, 10.5%, and 6.2% required at least one hospitalization, 47.9%, 54.6%, and 71.2% had uncontrolled asthma, and 23.9%, 8.6%, and 11.0% received long-term oral corticosteroids (LTOCS), respectively. Following biologic therapy, among patients who received biologics overall (n=2666) and among those whose asthma remained suboptimally controlled (n=1780), 19.1% and 23.0% experienced at least two exacerbations, 2.7% and 2.9% required at least one hospitalization, and 16.7% and 22.0% received LTOCS, respectively.

Conclusion

There is a substantial disease burden in both patients without access to biologics and those with access who do not receive these therapies, although specific outcomes may vary between these groups. There also remains a high unmet need among biologic recipients, many of whom have a suboptimal response to treatment.

Sub-Optimal Disease Control and Low Blood Eosinophil Testing Frequency in Chinese Adult Patients with Asthma Receiving GINA Step 4/5 Treatment: A Real-World Study

Purpose

To inform effective management strategies for severe asthma in China, this study aimed to comprehensively characterize clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, disease control status, and healthcare resource utilization among patients on GINA Step 4/5 therapies by analyzing data from the Adelphi Asthma Disease Specific Program conducted in China.

Patients and methods

All information was retrieved from medical records or collected from physicians and patients on the survey date (August-December 2018); no follow-up was conducted. Results were summarized descriptively for patients on GINA Step 4/5 therapies, who were pooled from a consecutive sample (comprising three or more consecutive patients with physician-diagnosed asthma from each participating physician) and an oversample (comprising the next two patients with physician-perceived severe asthma from each participating physician).

Results

Of the included patients (n=754), 51.5% had ever had a blood eosinophil measurement taken, 22.1% had available records for their most recent blood eosinophil measurements (68.9% of them had an elevated level ≥150 cells/µL), 39.9% had ever been tested for specific immunoglobulin E or radioallergosorbent, and 8.0% were prescribed maintenance oral corticosteroids. Asthma was not well controlled in 69.2% of patients. In the prior year, 27.1% experienced at least one severe exacerbation and 22.8% experienced at least one hospitalization (emergency visit or overnight stay) due to asthma.

Conclusion

In Chinese patients with asthma on GINA Step 4/5 therapies, biomarker testing was underutilized, asthma was not well controlled, and severe exacerbations were not infrequent. These findings highlight the urgent need for optimized asthma management for patients on GINA Step 4/5 therapies in China.

Efficacy of Biologic Therapies in the Management of Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic condition characterized by nasal congestion, sneezing, and itching, which significantly impacts quality of life. Traditional treatments, including antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids, often fall short in managing moderate-to-severe cases. Recently, biologic therapies such as omalizumab and dupilumab have emerged as potential alternatives. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these biologic therapies in the management of AR. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify studies published between 2000 and 2024. Studies included were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and post-hoc analyses that assessed the impact of biologics on AR symptoms. Data on study characteristics, population demographics, intervention details, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed. The review included nine studies evaluating omalizumab and dupilumab. Omalizumab demonstrated significant improvements in nasal symptoms and quality of life, with notable efficacy in reducing symptoms and improving asthma control in patients with moderate-to-severe AR. Dupilumab also showed positive outcomes, particularly in patients with comorbid asthma and perennial AR, by reducing severe exacerbations and improving symptom scores. Biologic therapies, including omalizumab and dupilumab, offer promising alternatives for the management of AR, especially in cases that are severe or refractory to conventional treatments. The evidence supports their efficacy in improving symptoms and quality of life. Nevertheless, further research is required to address the limitations identified, including the need for long-term data and clarification of the mechanisms of action. These findings underscore the potential of biologics in advancing the treatment of AR and highlight the importance of ongoing research to optimize patient outcomes.

Real-world clinical remission of severe asthma with benralizumab in Spanish adults with severe asthma

OBJECTIVE

Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma experience high risk of exacerbations and reduced quality of life. Benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody binding to IL-5 receptor α subunit, is an approved drug for its treatment. The objective was to describe clinical remission after benralizumab prescription in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study with data from four hospitals in Valencian Community (Spain) with asthma units between 2019 and 2020. Data was gathered at baseline and after 12 months. We considered clinical remission after 1 year if the patient remained without exacerbations and use of systemic corticosteroids and with good clinical control and normal lung function.

RESULTS

Data from 139 patients was gathered. At the 12-month follow-up, 44.1% were in clinical remission, since 84.0%, 77.5%, 51.0% and 95.5% of patients did not experience exacerbations, had total asthma control test score of ≥20, prebronchodilator FEV1 of ≥80% and did not use systemic corticosteroids. A significant reduction of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (p = 0.0001), leukotriene receptor antagonists (p = 0.0326), oral corticosteroids (p < 0.0001) and short-acting beta agonists (p = 0.0499) was observed. Baseline factors with greatest individual influence on clinical remission were employment situation, tobacco use, comorbidity number, eosinophil value, number of exacerbations, FEV1, emergency visit number, and ACT, MiniAQLQ and TAI scores. Final analysis of multiple logistic regression indicated that having baseline FEV1 value below 80% increases remission chance 9.7 times a year compared to FEV1 >80%.

CONCLUSION

Clinical remission after treatment with benralizumab is achievable in a high percentage of patients with severe asthma eosinophilia not controlled in real life.

Association of Cough Severity with Asthma Control and Quality of Life in Patients with Severe Asthma

PURPOSE

Symptoms are important components in determining asthma control and in the adjustment of treatment levels. However, clinical relevance of cough in severe asthma is not well-understood. This study aimed to evaluate the severity and association of cough with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with severe asthma.

METHODS

This study analyzed cross-sectional data from the Korean Severe Asthma Registry. The severity of coughing and wheezing symptoms was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 for each symptom. Additionally, PROs included the Asthma Control Test (ACT), the Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ), and the EuroQoL 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) index. Multivariate linear regression analysis was employed to explore the relationship between cough severity and other PRO scores.

RESULTS

A total of 498 patients with severe asthma (age: 57.9 ± 13.1 years, females: 60.2%) were analyzed. The cough VAS score was higher than the wheeze score (median 30, [interquartile range 10-50] vs. 20 [0-50]; P < 0.001). Additionally, 22.5% of patients ranked in a higher tertile for cough severity compared to wheezing, while 18.5% ranked higher for wheezing severity than cough. Significant correlations were observed between cough and wheeze VAS scores (r = 0.61, P < 0.05) and between each symptom's VAS score and the SAQ (cough: r = -0.41, P < 0.001; wheeze: r = -0.52, P < 0.001), ACT scores (cough: r = -0.50, P < 0.001; wheeze: r = -0.63, P < 0.001) and EQ-5D index (cough: r = -0.40, P < 0.001; wheeze: r = -0.45, P < 0.001). In univariate regression analysis, the cough VAS score had weaker descriptive power (R2) values than the wheeze VAS score in relation to the PRO measures. Nevertheless, cough severity remained significantly associated with ACT, SAQ scores and EQ-5D index in multivariate analyses adjusted for wheeze severity and other confounders.

CONCLUSION

Cough frequently presents as a severe symptom in patients with severe asthma and could have distinct impact on asthma control and quality of life.

Anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5R biologics for severe asthma. Are there any differences in their effects?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective multicentre study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα therapies and to compare their effectiveness.

METHODS

We collected and analysed results separately for anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα therapies from January 2016 until December 2021 in multidisciplinary severe asthma units. We collected demographic and clinical data, treatment with previous anti-IgE and/or anti-IL-5 agents, and comorbidities. We compared the number of exacerbations and admissions to the hospital, daily oral corticosteroid intake, pulmonary function tests, and Asthma Control Test scores before and after 12 months of therapy. 261 patients were included: 176 patients in the anti-IL-5 group and 85 in the anti-IL-5Rα group.

RESULTS

Both groups led to statistically significant reductions in asthma exacerbations, hospital admissions, and visits to the Emergency Room. Although both groups showed a significant reduction in blood eosinophiliccount, we found a difference, although not significant, in the magnitude of reduction as benralizumab was able to decrease eosinophil counts to zero. Patients in the anti-IL-5 group achieved higher ACT scores after treatment, although this improvement was seen in both treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα biologics have shown similar effectiveness despite having different mechanisms of action. The anti-IL-5 group appeared to be better than benralizumab at improving ACT scores and FEV1/FVC and at reducing the number of inhalers. Although these differences were not statistically significant, it is not clear whether they may have clinical relevance and they might highlight the need for further head-to-head studies comparing these treatments.

Anti-IL-5 Pathway Agents in Eosinophilic-Associated Disorders Across the Lifespan

Monoclonal antibodies targeting interleukin (IL)-5 pathways have revolutionized the treatment expectations for eosinophilic-associated conditions, particularly in patients with respiratory involvement. Mepolizumab (IL-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody), benralizumab (IL-5 receptor blocker monoclonal antibody), and reslizumab (IL-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody) have collectively contributed to the overall improvement of the disease burden in various conditions. Eosinophilic asthma currently boasts the most robust evidence across all age groups: all three biologics are approved for adults (aged ≥18 years); mepolizumab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also in children (aged ≥ 6 years), while bernalizumab was recently approved by the FDA for patients aged ≥6 years in the USA. In chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, subcutaneous mepolizumab is the only anti-IL-5 therapy approved so far and can be used in adult patients (aged ≥18 years). For eosinophilic esophagitis, conflicting evidence surrounds both mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab, leading to non-approval of these agents by the FDA/EMA. Recently, mepolizumab was approved for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis patients aged ≥6 years or older and for hypereosinophilic syndrome adult patients. A phase III trial proving noninferiority of benralizumab versus mepolizumab in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis has been recently published, while evidence on reslizumab is scant. Overall, current evidence on anti-IL-5 biologics for eosinophilic-associated disorders is mostly focused on adults, whereas data for individuals aged under 18 years and over 65 years are scarce, resulting in a lack of evidence, particularly regarding efficacy, for the use of anti-IL-5 agents in these specific patient populations. This review addresses high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials and real-world post-marketing studies regarding the use of anti-IL-5 therapies for eosinophilic-associated disorders across all age groups, spanning childhood, adulthood, and older age.

Combination Biologic Therapy with Mepolizumab and Dupilumab for Severe Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyp

We report the case of a 55-year-old female with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp. Rhinosinusitis recurred 6 months after full-house endoscopic sinus surgery. Although conventional treatment with azathioprine and mepolizumab with steroids was given, it was difficult to simultaneously control both rhinosinusitis and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Clinical examinations showed polyps in the olfactory cleft, and the patient's anosmia gradually became persistent. Even after administering mepolizumab for a certain period of time, symptoms did not improve, but when the biologic agent was switched to dupilumab, an improvement in recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp was observed. While dupilumab was administered intermittently for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp, the rhinosinusitis improved and symptoms such as worsening of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis paresthesia were observed. Both symptoms gradually subsided 19 months after starting intermittent administration, leading to the discontinuation of dupilumab administration. Rhinosinusitis in the setting of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis may be refractory in some cases, and this case provides findings demonstrating the strong effect of dupilumab on eosinophilic inflammation.

Long-term safety, durability of response, cessation and switching of biologics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Severe asthma patients suffer from decreased quality of life, and increased asthma symptoms, exacerbations, hospitalizations, and risk of death. Biologics have revolutionized treatment for severe asthma. However, with multiple biologic agents now available, clinicians must consider initial selection the long-term effectiveness of biologics. Additionally, patients have overlapping eligibilities and clinicians may consider switching between biologics for improved response. Finally, careful assessment of biologics cessation is needed for severe asthma patients who depend on these add-on therapies for asthma control.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence for long-term durability and safety varies by biologic agent. In general, initial benefits noted from these agents (ex. exacerbation reduction) is, at minimum, sustained with long term use. Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events, including those requiring cessation of a biologics are low with long term use. Further studies are needed to understand the development of antidrug antibodies but currently their prevalence rates are low. Adverse events and insufficient efficacy are common reasons for biologic cessation or switching. Discontinuation maybe associated with waning of benefits but can be considered in certain situations. Biologic switching can be associated with improved asthma control.

SUMMARY

Biologics are safe and effective long-term therapies for the management of asthma. Discontinuation must be carefully considered and if possible avoided. Reasons for insufficient efficacy must be evaluated and if needed, biologic switching should be considered.

Prediction of Clinical Response to Dupilumab in Patients with Severe Asthma Using Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Combined with Pulmonary Function Testing

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) combined with pulmonary function testing (PFT) for predicting the treatment outcome of patients with severe asthma receiving dupilumab.

METHODS

A total of 31 patients with severe asthma visiting our hospital from January 2022 to June 2023 were included in this study, with 28 patients completing a 16-week course of dupilumab treatment. Baseline clinical data, including demographic information, blood eosinophil counts, serum IgE levels, FeNO, asthma control test (ACT), asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), and other parameters, were collected. A predictive model using a generalized linear model was established.

RESULTS

Following the 16-week course of dupilumab treatment, 22 patients showed effective response based on GETE scores, while 6 patients were nonresponders. Notably, significant improvements were observed in clinical parameters such as blood eosinophil counts, serum IgE levels, FeNO, FEV1, FEV1%, ACT, and ACQ in both response groups (p < 0.05). FeNO and pulmonary function tests demonstrated AUC values of 0.530, 0.561, and 0.765, respectively, in predicting the clinical efficacy of dupilumab, which were lower than when FeNO was combined with FEV1%. The combination of FeNO and FEV1% had a sensitivity of 1.000 and specificity of 0.591 in predicting treatment response.

CONCLUSION

The combined assessment of FeNO and FEV1% provides improved accuracy for predicting the clinical efficacy of dupilumab in managing severe asthma. However, further larger scale clinical studies with comprehensive follow-up data are needed to validate the therapeutic efficacy and applicability across diverse patient populations.

Difficult-To-Treat and Severe Asthma: Can Real-World Studies On Effectiveness of Biological Treatments Change the Lives of Patients?

Many different phenotypes that characterize severe asthma are supported by intricate pathomechanisms called endotypes. The latter are driven by molecular interactions, mediated by intercellular networks. With regard to the biological treatments of either allergic or non-allergic eosinophilic type 2 asthma, real-world studies have confirmed the positive effects of currently available antibodies directed against immunoglobulins E (IgE), interleukin-5 (IL-5) and its receptor, as well as the receptors of interleukins-4 (IL-4) and 13 (IL-13). The best way to treat severe asthma should be chosen based on the peculiar phenotypic and endotypic traits of each patient. This will lead to relevant improvements in both clinical and functional outcomes. In particular, biological therapies can change the lives of asthma patients with a strong impact on quality of life. Unfortunately, patients with severe non-type-2 asthma, who continue to have pertinent unmet needs, are not receiving satisfactory advances within the context of biological treatments. It is also hopeful that in the next future new therapeutic strategies will be specifically implemented for these people, perhaps offering them the opportunity to improve their current, mostly inadequate asthma management.

Healthcare costs and resources utilization in children with difficult-to-control asthma treated with biologic therapies: A population-based cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is one of the most common diseases in children, with a variable range of severity. In recent years, treatment for severe asthma has been largely improved by the availability of targeted biologic therapies. Nevertheless, studies reporting real-world data and cost-effectiveness analyses are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate, on a population-based cohort of children with asthma, the impact of the treatment with biologics on healthcare service utilization and associated costs.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from Healthcare Utilization database of Lombardy region (Italy). A cohort of 46 asthmatic children aged 6-11 in treatment with dupilumab, mepolizumab or omalizumab was identified during 2017-2021. We compared healthcare resources use between the year before ("baseline period") and the year after the treatment initiation ("follow-up period"). Average 1-year healthcare costs were also calculated.

RESULTS

Comparing the baseline with the follow-up period, the number of patients with at least one exacerbation-related hospitalization and ER access decreased by 75.0% and 85.7%, respectively. The use of biologic agents, namely omalizumab, mepolizumab and dupilumab, significantly reduced oral corticosteroids (OCS), short-acting β2-agonists and the association inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists use. ER admissions for non-respiratory causes were also significantly reduced, while discontinuation rate was low (6.5%). The overall costs increased, due to the costs of the biologic agents, but the hospital admission-related costs due to respiratory causes reduced significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world investigation suggests that biologic agents reduced hospital admissions for respiratory causes and use of anti-asthmatic drugs, including OCS. However, long-term healthcare sustainability still needs more in-depth assessments.

Benralizumab treatment in an elderly patient with eosinophilic esophagitis resulted in remission: a case report

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-5 (IL-5) has recently been shown to play a crucial role in eosinophil-mediated diseases, implying that an IL-5 receptor alpha chain (IL-5Rα) antibody (benralizumab) can be effective against eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Here, we present a case in which benralizumab significantly improved the symptoms and signs of an elderly Asian woman with EoE who had inadequate response to existing treatments. Case presentation A 73-year-old woman with an 8-year history of bronchial asthma (BA) and a 7-year history of dysphagia presented to our hospital with worsening dysphagia, vomiting, chest pain, and difficulty in eating. Blood biochemical findings revealed an increase in the eosinophil fraction of white blood cells (42.2%), and a conventional chest computed tomography scan revealed esophageal wall thickening. An upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed mucosal edema as well as multiple esophageal rings, and esophageal biopsy specimens showed an eosinophilic infiltrate of more than 15 cells/ high power field. Based on these findings, she was diagnosed as EoE complicated by BA. We firstly administrated 20 mg/day of prednisolone, rabeprazole sodium and liquid budesonide oral suspension for 5 months; however, they were ineffective and her dysphagia worsened over time. Then, benralizumab treatment in combination with these drugs was started. Her dysphagia completely disappeared 2 weeks after starting benralizumab, and an upper endoscopy showed that the clinical findings had completely disappeared after another 6 weeks. Benralizumab was then given to her for 41 months, and her symptoms remained in remission. In addition, she had no EoE recurrence for more than 12 months after discontinuing benralizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Benralizumab in combination with other multiple drugs significantly improved the symptoms and examination findings of an elderly patients with EoE. Furthermore, she experienced no recurrence even after discontinuing benralizumab withdrawal, suggesting that benralizumab could be an appropriate therapeutic option for EoE.

Novel Immunopharmacological Drugs for the Treatment of Allergic Diseases

The exponential rise in the prevalence of allergic diseases since the mid-twentieth century has led to a genuine public health emergency and has also fostered major progress in research on the underlying mechanisms and potential treatments. The management of allergic diseases benefits from the biological revolution, with an array of novel immunomodulatory therapeutic and investigational tools targeting players of allergic inflammation at distinct pathophysiological steps. Prominent examples include therapeutic monoclonal antibodies against cytokines, alarmins, and their receptors, as well as small-molecule modifiers of signal transduction mainly mediated by Janus kinases and Bruton's tyrosine kinases. However, the first-line therapeutic options have yet to switch from symptomatic to disease-modifying interventions. Here we present an overview of available drugs in the context of our current understanding of allergy pathophysiology, identify potential therapeutic targets, and conclude by providing a selection of candidate immunopharmacological molecules under investigation for potential future use in allergic diseases.

Impact of obesity in asthma: Possible future therapies

Obesity is one of the factors associated with the severity of asthma. Obesity is associated with aggravation of the pathophysiology of asthma, including exacerbations, airway inflammation, decreased pulmonary function, and airway hyperresponsiveness. The present review addresses the characteristics of asthma with obesity, focusing especially on the heterogeneity caused by the degree of type 2 inflammation, sex differences, the onset of asthma, and race differences. To understand the severity mechanisms in asthma and obesity, such as corticosteroid resistance, fatty acids, gut microbiome, and cytokines, several basic research studies are evaluated. Finally, possible future therapies, including weight reduction, microbiome-targeted therapies, and other molecular targeted therapies are addressed. We believe that the present review will contribute to better understanding of the severity mechanisms and the establishment of novel treatments for severe asthma patients with obesity.

Insights from the trends of omalizumab and mepolizumab utilization in patients with asthma: A population-based cohort study using the National Database in Japan

BACKGROUND

Biologics are increasingly being used in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. However, the trends in their use for treating severe asthma in Japan remain unclear.

METHODS

The number of patients with asthma prescribed omalizumab or mepolizumab between April 2017 and March 2018 was estimated according to sex, age, and geographical region using data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan.

RESULTS

Overall, 5,014, 3,449 and 7,977 patients were prescribed omalizumab, mepolizumab, or either combination, respectively. The total number of patients prescribed biologics displayed a bimodal distribution with peaks in their early teens and seventies. Biologics were most commonly used by male and female patients in their seventies. Prescription was 1.24 times higher in males than in females up to the teenage years, whereas it was 1.95 times higher in females than in males from their twenties onwards. Omalizumab was prescribed 1.45 times more frequently than mepolizumab, especially in pediatric patients, and was prescribed 1.96 times more often to female patients than to male patients. Regional differences were observed in the proportion of patients prescribed biologics. Correlation analysis suggested a weak relationship (r = 0.3226, p = 0.0270) between the proportion of patients prescribed biologics and board-certified allergists according to the geographic region.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japan, biologics are prescribed more often to older patients with severe asthma compared to those in other countries. Thus, eliminating the regional disparities in asthma treatment by specialists is necessary to provide appropriate medical care to patients with severe asthma.

Biologics in severe asthma: A pragmatic approach for choosing the right treatment for the right patient

The development of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting specific components of the pathways relevant to asthma pathophysiology has revolutionized treatment of severe asthma both in adults and children and helped to further unravel the heterogeneity of this disease. However, the availability of multiple agents, often with overlapping eligibility criteria, creates a need for pragmatic guidance for specialists undertaking care of patients with severe asthma. In this review, we provide an overview of the data supporting the clinical efficacy of biologics in distinct asthma phenotypes/endotypes. We also focus on the role of biomarkers and treatable traits, including comorbidities, in the choice of asthma biologics, highlight which treatments have been demonstrated to be steroid sparing in corticosteroid dependent asthma, and provide practical guidance that can drive shared decision making on treatment choice with patients. In addition, we summarize what is known to date regarding long-term safety of these drugs, and lastly, discuss future directions in biologics research.

Addressing therapeutic inertia for asthma biologics: Lessons from the KOFU study

Despite evidence-based guidelines and the availability of five biologics in Japan to treat severe asthma, approximately one-third of patients with severe asthma continue to have uncontrolled disease. This lack of appropriate evidence-based treatment is a complex issue resulting from therapeutic inertia, a lack of treatment intensification according to evidence-based guidelines for patients who are considered eligible but not receiving therapy, and is often driven by complex factors involving patients, physicians, and healthcare systems. The KOFU study, the largest cross-sectional Internet Survey for severe asthma in Japan, addressed potential barriers to starting biologic treatment and sought a solution for therapeutic inertia regarding asthma biologics. Although the burden of high medical costs is the largest barrier to initiating biologic treatment for patients, other important barriers were also revealed, including an incorrect perception of asthma severity or a poor recognition of the need for treatment intensification, a lack of proper communication with patients or a lack of confidence in the physicians, initiating biologics together with the complicated process of the insurance systems to ease the burden of high medical costs or strict criteria for the approval of biologics for health care insurance systems. Increased awareness and understanding of these barriers to biologic treatment may facilitate an optimal recommendation process to individualize treatment in patients with severe asthma.

[Biologics in severe childhood asthma]

INTRODUCTION

Severe asthma in children remains relatively rare. It is no longer considered as a single disease but rather as a syndrome corresponding to different phenotypes and distinct pathophysiological pathways. Various biomarkers can contribute to phenotyping, essentially specific IgE test results, blood eosinophil counts, the exhaled fraction of NO (FeNO) assay, as well as deep lung biomarkers from induced sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage or bronchial biopsy.

STATE OF KNOWLEDGE

In children, the biologics currently approved for severe asthma are omalizumab, mepolizumab and dupilumab from the age of 6, and tezepelumab from the age of 12.

PERSPECTIVES

Benralizumab and tezepelumab offer promising perspectives and a pediatric extension could be of interest in future treatment of severe pediatric asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on physiopathological mechanisms, biologics represent a new and promising approach in the treatment of asthma. That said, the long-term efficacy and impact of these treatments on the natural history of the disease require further investigation. It is of paramount importance to take into account the specificities of pediatric asthma and, more particularly, to conduct clinical trials in younger patients.

Omalizumab Transitions in Severe Asthma: Factors Influencing Switching Decisions and Timing for Optimal Response

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of switching from omalizumab to another biologic therapy for patients with severe asthma and evaluate factors that influenced the decision to switch and determined the optimal time for a good biologic response.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of severe asthma patients was conducted at Al-Rashed Allergy Center, a tertiary center in Kuwait. After meeting the eligibility criteria, patients were divided into two comparative groups: those continuing with omalizumab and those who started with omalizumab but switched to another biologic.

RESULTS

One hundred sixteen patients with severe asthma were recruited, and only 33 had access to multiple biological treatments. Approximately 22.4% switched from omalizumab. Male patients with a history of ischemic heart disease, chronic rhinosinusitis, and nasal polyps were more likely to switch if they had higher levels of eosinophils in the sputum. This study showed that every 1% increase in sputum eosinophils doubled the likelihood of a switch. Patients with access to alternative biological options had a much shorter mean duration of omalizumab therapy before switching compared to those with only affordable omalizumab: 4.9 ± 1.5 years versus 8.9 ± 1.3 years (p < 0.001). The optimal time to predict the likelihood of a good response was less than 5.5 years, with an area under the curve of 0.91 and p = 0.003. This cutoff point provided a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 89% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

An early transition from omalizumab, specifically within the first 5 years of treatment, in patients with severe asthma and higher sputum eosinophils may enhance the likelihood of a good response if other biological therapies were available.

Dupilumab in a patient with severe asthma and glucocorticoid hypersensitivity: a case report

Recently, several biologics have been approved for the treatment of severe asthma. Dupilumab, a biologic used to treat severe asthma, is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 and interleukin-13. In the present case, inhaled corticosteroid-induced glucocorticoid hypersensitivity was suspected, and the administration of omalizumab and mepolizumab had no beneficial effects. Subsequently, we switched to dupilumab therapy, which produced better effectiveness. Therefore, when a biologic agent proves ineffective, changing to another suitable biologic agent should be considered.

Clinical Asthma Remission Obtained with Biologics in Real Life: Patients' Prevalence and Characteristics

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of clinical asthma remission with biologics in severe asthma has not been well understood yet. We do not even know whether there might be characteristics that identify subjects prone to remission of the disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, four groups of severe asthmatics already treated with Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, Benralizumab and Dupilumab (302, 55, 95 and 34 patients, respectively) for at least 12 months were considered. The number of individuals with clinical asthma remission was sought in each group. This was considered when patients, after a treatment of at least 1 year with one of the aforesaid biologics, showed the disappearance of asthma symptoms (ACT ≥ 20), zero exacerbations, suspension of oral corticosteroids and a FEV₁% ≥ 80%. Baseline characteristics of patients with and without remission were also taken into account.

RESULTS

The prevalence of asthma remission after a mean of 37.8 ± 19.2, 13.5 ± 1.7, 15.4 ± 5.5 and 12 ± 0 months of Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, Benralizumab and Dupilumab treatments was 21.8%, 23.6%, 35.8% and 23.5%, respectively. For each biologic, different baseline characteristics, seem to be associated with failure to achieve clinical asthma remission. Older age, higher BMI, a later age of asthma onset, rhinitis/sinusitis/nasal polyposis, comorbidities and a greater asthma severity may be the characteristics of a suboptimal response to biologic treatments.

CONCLUSION

All biologics have the potential to induce disease remission in severe asthmatics. For each biologic, there may be several markers that can identify the patients who will not achieve asthma remission. It would be important to detect them (by carrying out targeted studies) as they would allow us to select the best biologic that may induce clinical asthma remission on a larger number of patients.

Pathobiology of Type 2 Inflammation in Asthma and Nasal Polyposis

Asthma and nasal polyposis often coexist and are frequently intertwined by tight pathogenic links, mainly consisting of the cellular and molecular pathways underpinning type 2 airway inflammation. The latter is characterized by a structural and functional impairment of the epithelial barrier, associated with the eosinophilic infiltration of both the lower and upper airways, which can be driven by either allergic or non-allergic mechanisms. Type 2 inflammatory changes are predominantly due to the biological actions exerted by interleukins 4 (IL-4), 13 (IL-13), and 5 (IL-5), produced by T helper 2 (Th2) lymphocytes and group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2). In addition to the above cytokines, other proinflammatory mediators involved in the pathobiology of asthma and nasal polyposis include prostaglandin D₂ and cysteinyl leukotrienes. Within this context of 'united airway diseases', nasal polyposis encompasses several nosological entities such as chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Because of the common pathogenic origins of asthma and nasal polyposis, it is not surprising that the more severe forms of both these disorders can be successfully treated by the same biologic drugs, targeting many molecular components (IgE, IL-5 and its receptor, IL-4/IL-13 receptors) of the type 2 inflammatory trait.

A Real-World Study of Achievement Rate and Predictive Factors of Clinical and Deep Remission to Biologics in Patients with Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in biologics have provided new insights into the clinical course of asthma, including disease modification, clinical remission (CR), and deep remission (DR). However, the extent to which biologics achieve CR and DR in severe asthma patients is poorly understood.

METHODS

To assess the achievement rate and predictors of CR and DR using long-term biologics, we retrospectively evaluated 54 severe asthma patients recently started on biologics. "CR" denotes the achievement of all three criteria: (1) absence of asthma symptoms, (2) no asthma exacerbations, and (3) no use of oral corticosteroids. DR denoted CR plus (4) normalized pulmonary function and (5) suppressed type 2 inflammation.

RESULTS

CR and DR achievement rates were 68.5% and 31.5%, respectively. Compared with the non-deep remission group, the DR group had higher adult-onset asthma rates (94.1% vs. 70.3%, p = 0.078), shorter asthma duration (5 vs. 19 years, p = 0.006), and higher FEV₁ (91.5% vs. 71.5%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the Asthma Control Questionnaire scores, exacerbation frequency, or type 2 inflammation at baseline between groups. Asthma duration combined with FEV₁ can stratify the achievement rates of CR and DR.

CONCLUSIONS

the early introduction of biologics in severe asthma patients may help achieve CR and DR.