Commentary on the Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET)

Carvedilol Activates a Myofilament Signaling Circuitry to Restore Cardiac Contractility in Heart Failure

Phosphorylation of myofilament proteins critically regulates beat-to-beat cardiac contraction and is typically altered in heart failure (HF). β-Adrenergic activation induces phosphorylation in numerous substrates at the myofilament. Nevertheless, how cardiac β-adrenoceptors (βARs) signal to the myofilament in healthy and diseased hearts remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to uncover the spatiotemporal regulation of local βAR signaling at the myofilament and thus identify a potential therapeutic target for HF. Phosphoproteomic analysis of substrate phosphorylation induced by different βAR ligands in mouse hearts was performed. Genetically encoded biosensors were used to characterize cyclic adenosine and guanosine monophosphate signaling and the impacts on excitation-contraction coupling induced by β1AR ligands at both the cardiomyocyte and whole-heart levels. Myofilament signaling circuitry was identified, including protein kinase G1 (PKG1)-dependent phosphorylation of myosin light chain kinase, myosin phosphatase target subunit 1, and myosin light chain at the myofilaments. The increased phosphorylation of myosin light chain enhances cardiac contractility, with a minimal increase in calcium (Ca2+) cycling. This myofilament signaling paradigm is promoted by carvedilol-induced β1AR-nitric oxide synthetase 3 (NOS3)-dependent cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling, drawing a parallel to the β1AR-cyclic adenosine monophosphate-protein kinase A pathway. In patients with HF and a mouse HF model of myocardial infarction, increasing expression and association of NOS3 with β1AR were observed. Stimulating β1AR-NOS3-PKG1 signaling increased cardiac contraction in the mouse HF model. This research has characterized myofilament β1AR-PKG1-dependent signaling circuitry to increase phosphorylation of myosin light chain and enhance cardiac contractility, with a minimal increase in Ca2+ cycling. The present findings raise the possibility of targeting this myofilament signaling circuitry for treatment of patients with HF.

Comparison of metoprolol succinate versus carvedilol in time to cardiovascular admission in a Veterans Affairs healthcare system: An observational study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if metoprolol succinate or carvedilol is more effective in delaying the time to first cardiovascular disease hospital admission in systolic heart failure patients. As a secondary objective, to determine the most effective dose of each agent in delaying first cardiovascular disease hospital admission, including but not limited to heart failure exacerbation, myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias, or death.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective chart review of 272 veterans at the VA Boston Healthcare System newly started on metoprolol succinate (n = 157) or carvedilol (n = 115) between January 2000 and December 2008. After an 8-week study medication titration period, subjects were subcategorized into low-, medium-, and high-dose ranging groups and followed until the first cardiovascular disease hospitalization, death, or 365 days. The main outcome measure was time to first cardiovascular hospitalization or death.

RESULTS

The mean age (69.9 years vs. 67.9 years) and ejection fraction (26% vs. 25%) were comparable between study arms at baseline. Mean time to first cardiovascular disease hospitalization was significantly different (p = 0.001) between study groups with 330.6 days with in metoprolol succinate group vs. 282.6 days in the carvedilol groups. High-dose carvedilol significantly delayed time to first hospitalization in comparison to medium or low carvedilol doses (p = 0.015, p = 0.005). Low- and high-dose metoprolol succinate were not significantly different (p = 0.509) in time to first event, and both dosing groups fared better compared to medium dose metoprolol succinate (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

In this veteran patient population in need of additional heart failure treatments, metoprolol succinate use resulted in a delayed time to first cardiovascular disease hospitalization or death compared to carvedilol. Both low and high doses of metoprolol succinate showed a significant delay of time to first cardiovascular hospitalization compared to medium doses of metoprolol succinate. Higher doses of carvedilol showed a significant delay of time to cardiovascular hospitalization than lower carvedilol doses.

Role of β-blocker therapy in pediatric heart failure

Heart failure is becoming an increasingly common and significant problem in the field of pediatric cardiology. The numerous types of cardiomyopathies, and more recently, long-term survival of patients with congenital heart disease, have added to a growing patient population. Over the last several decades, our knowledge base regarding mechanisms of disease and therapeutic intervention in adult patients with heart failure has drastically changed. The most recent and important breakthrough in the pharmacologic treatment of heart failure has been the particular role of β-blocker therapy. This medication has led to significant improvements in survival and symptoms in adults, with less convincing findings in limited studies in pediatrics. The ability to study the benefits of this therapy in patients has been challenging owing to the heterogeneity of the patient population and lack of large sample sizes. However, as we investigate the mechanisms behind the disease process, the differences that exist between disease conditions and ages, and the significant alterations that may exist at the molecular and genetic level, our understanding of β-blocker therapy in pediatric heart failure will improve, and ultimately may lead to patient-specific therapy.

Pediatric heart failure therapy with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists

Management of chronic heart failure in pediatrics has been altered by the adult literature showing improvements in mortality and hospitalization rates with the use of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) for routine therapy of all classes of ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure. Many pediatric heart failure specialists have incorporated these agents into their routine management of pediatric heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy or ventricular dysfunction in association with congenital heart disease. Retrospective and small prospective case series have shown encouraging improvements in cardiac function and symptoms, but interpretation has been complicated by the high rate of spontaneous recovery in pediatric patients. A recently completed pediatric double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial showed no difference between placebo and two doses of carvedilol over a 6-month period of follow-up, with significant improvement of all three groups over the course of evaluation. Experience with adults has suggested that only certain beta-blockers, including carvedilol, bisoprolol, nebivolol, and metoprolol succinate, should be used in the treatment of heart failure and that patients with high-grade heart failure may derive the most benefit. Other studies surmise that early or prophylactic use of these medications may alter the risk of disease progression in some high-risk subsets, such as patients receiving anthracyclines or those with muscular dystrophy. This article reviews these topics using experience as well as data from all the recent pediatric studies on the use of beta-blockers to treat congestive heart failure, especially when related to systolic ventricular dysfunction.

The effect of carvedilol on metabolic parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome

The objective of the present study was to explore the effect of carvedilol treatment on metabolic parameters in patients with metabolic syndrome. A total of 77 patients > or = 20 years of age (59 females, 18 males, mean age, 52.3 +/- 10.3) with stage 1 hypertension who fulfilled at least 3 of the metabolic syndrome criteria proposed by NCEP-ATP III were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive daily treatment with carvedilol (n = 27, 12.5 mg/day orally for the first 2 days and 25 mg/day thereafter), atenolol (n = 26, 50 mg/day orally), or doxazosin (n = 24, 2 mg/day orally) for 90 days. Doses were doubled at the end of the 3rd week in patients whose blood pressure was inadequately controlled and amlodipine 10 mg was added to the treatment if the target blood pressure was still not reached at the end of week 6. The biochemical parameters and insulin sensitivity based on the HOMA-IR model were evaluated at baseline and at the end of treatment. Similar reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed in all groups (P > 0.05). A significant decrease in HDL cholesterol levels occurred in the doxazosin and atenolol groups compared to the carvedilol group (percent change: -5.6 +/- 13.5 and -8 +/- 9.8 versus -0.1 +/- 12.2, respectively; P < 0.05) and a significant increase in apolipoprotein A1 level was observed in the carvedilol group compared to the doxazosin and atenolol groups (percent change: + 4.3 +/- 9.6 versus - 0.5 +/- 10.6 and -2.3 +/- 6.6, respectively; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences among the groups with respect to other parameters. It is concluded antihypertensive treatment with carvedilol in patients with metabolic syndrome effectively reduces blood pressure without adversely affecting metabolic parameters.

Beta-blockers in heart failure: are pharmacological differences clinically important?

Beta-blockers are not an homogeneous group of agents. Only three beta-blockers, carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol succinate, have had favorable effects on prognosis in controlled clinical trials in the patients with chronic heart failure. However, pharmacological differences exist between them. Metoprolol and bisoprolol are selective for beta(1)-adrenergic receptors while carvedilol blocks also beta(2)-, and alpha(1)- adrenergic receptors, and has associated antioxidant, anti-endothelin and antiproliferative properties. In COMET carvedilol was associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared to metoprolol tartrate further showing that different beta-blockers may have different effects on the outcome. These differences may be related to the ancillary properties of carvedilol or to its broader antiadrenergic profile. However, also more effective and prolonged blockade of beta1 adrenergic receptors may occur with carvedilol compared to metoprolol.