Role of Adjuvant Renal Sympathetic Denervation in the Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias

Management of patients with an electrical storm or clustered ventricular arrhythmias: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC-endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Rhythm Society, and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society

Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability, manifesting as recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over a short period of time (three or more episodes of sustained VA within 24 h, separated by at least 5 min, requiring termination by an intervention). The clinical presentation can vary, but ES is usually a cardiac emergency. Electrical storm mainly affects patients with structural or primary electrical heart disease, often with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Management of ES requires a multi-faceted approach and the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams, but despite advanced treatment and often invasive procedures, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, longer survival of heart failure patients, and an increasing number of patients with ICD, the incidence of ES is expected to increase. This European Heart Rhythm Association clinical consensus statement focuses on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and acute and long-term management of patients presenting with ES or clustered VA.

Etiologies, Mechanisms, Management, and Outcomes of Electrical Storm

Electrical storm (ES) is characterized by three or more discrete sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes occurring within a limited time frame (generally ≤ 24 h) or an incessant ventricular tachyarrhythmia lasting > 12 h. In patients with an implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD), ES is defined as three or more appropriate device therapies, separated from each other by at least 5 min, which occur within a 24-h period. ES may constitute a medical emergency, depending on the number arrhythmic episodes, their duration, the type, and the cycle length of the ventricular arrhythmias, as well as the underlying ventricular function. This narrative review was facilitated by a search of MEDLINE to identify peer-reviewed clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and other clinically relevant studies. The search was limited to English-language reports published between 1999 and 2023. ES was searched using the terms mechanisms, genetics, channelopathies, management, pharmacological therapy, sedation, neuraxial modulation, cardiac sympathetic denervation, ICDs, and structural heart disease. Google and Google scholar as well as bibliographies of identified articles were reviewed for additional references. This manuscript examines the current strategies available to treat ES and compares pharmacological and invasive treatment strategies to diminish ES recurrence, morbidity, and mortality.

Sympathetic Modulation in Cardiac Arrhythmias: Where We Stand and Where We Go

The nuance of autonomic cardiac control has been studied for more than 400 years, yet little is understood. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding, clinical implications, and ongoing studies of cardiac sympathetic modulation and its anti-ventricular arrhythmias' therapeutic potential. Molecular-level studies and clinical studies were reviewed to elucidate the gaps in knowledge and the possible future directions for these strategies to be translated into the clinical setting. Imbalanced sympathoexcitation and parasympathetic withdrawal destabilize cardiac electrophysiology and confer the development of ventricular arrhythmias. Therefore, the current strategy for rebalancing the autonomic system includes attenuating sympathoexcitation and increasing vagal tone. Multilevel targets of the cardiac neuraxis exist, and some have emerged as promising antiarrhythmic strategies. These interventions include pharmacological blockade, permanent cardiac sympathetic denervation, temporal cardiac sympathetic denervation, etc. The gold standard approach, however, has not been known. Although neuromodulatory strategies have been shown to be highly effective in several acute animal studies with very promising results, the individual and interspecies variation between human autonomic systems limits the progress in this young field. There is, however, still much room to refine the current neuromodulation therapy to meet the unmet need for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Effects and mechanism of renal denervation on ventricular arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction in rats

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation (RDN) can reduce ventricular arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the mechanism is not clear. The purpose of this study is to study its mechanism.

METHODS

Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: control group, AMI group, RDN-1d + AMI group, RDN-2w + AMI group. The AMI model was established 1 day after RDN in the RDN-1d + AMI group and 2 weeks after RDN in the RDN-2w + AMI group. At the same time, 8 normal rats were subjected to AMI modelling (the AMI group). The control group consisted of 8 rats without RDN intervention or AMI modelling.

RESULTS

The study confirmed that RDN can reduce the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia in AMI rats, reduce renal sympathetic nerve discharge, and inhibit the activity of local sympathetic nerves and cell growth factor (NGF) protein expression in the heart after AMI. In addition, RDN decreased the expression of norepinephrine (NE) and glutamate in the hypothalamus,and NE in cerebrospinal fluid, and increased the expression level of γ aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the hypothalamus after AMI.

CONCLUSION

RDN can effectively reduce the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmia after AMI, and its main mechanism may be via the inhibition of central sympathetic nerve discharge.

Adjunctive Therapies for Ventricular Arrhythmia Management: Autonomic Neuromodulation-Established and Emerging Therapies

The autonomic nervous system plays an integral role in the pathophysiology of ventricular arrhythmias. In the modern era, several therapeutic interventions are available to the clinician for bedside and procedural/surgical management, and there are many ways in which modulation of the autonomic nervous system can provide life-saving benefit. This review discusses some of the current treatment options, the supporting evidence, and also introduce some of the emerging therapies in this expanding field of electrophysiology.

Systematic review of renal denervation for the management of cardiac arrhythmias

Background

In the wake of the controversy surrounding the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial and data from subsequent trials, this review aims to perform an updated and more comprehensive review of the impact of renal sympathetic denervation on cardiac arrhythmias.

Methods and results

A systematic search was performed using the Medline, Scopus and Embase databases using the terms “Renal Denervation” AND “Arrhythmias or Atrial or Ventricular”, limited to Human and English language studies within the last 10 years. This search yielded 19 relevant studies (n = 6 randomised controlled trials, n = 13 non-randomised cohort studies) which comprised 783 patients. The studies show RSD is a safe procedure, not associated with increases in complications or mortality post-procedure. Importantly, there is no evidence RSD is associated with a deterioration in renal function, even in patients with chronic kidney disease. RSD with or without adjunctive pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with improvements in freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF), premature atrial complexes (PACs), ventricular arrhythmias and other echocardiographic parameters. Significant reductions in ambulatory and office blood pressure were also observed in the majority of studies.

Conclusion

This review provides evidence based on original research that ‘second generation’ RSD is safe and is associated with reductions in short-term blood pressure and AF burden. However, the authors cannot draw firm conclusions with regards to less prominent arrhythmia subtypes due to the paucity of evidence available. Large multi-centre RCTs investigating the role of RSD are necessary to comprehensively assess the efficacy of the procedure treating various arrhythmias.

Graphic abstract

Renal denervation for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with heart disease. Recent studies evaluated the effect of renal denervation (RDN) on the occurrence of VAs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of this procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify studies that evaluated the use of RDN for the management of VAs. Primary outcomes were reduction in the number of VAs and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. Secondary outcomes were changes in blood pressure and renal function. Ten studies (152 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. RDN was associated with a reduction in the number of VAs, antitachycardia pacing, ICD shocks, and overall ICD therapies of 3.53 events/patient/month (95% confidence interval [CI] = -5.48 to -1.57), 2.86 events/patient/month (95% CI = -4.09 to -1.63), 2.04 events/patient/month (95% CI = -2.12 to -1.97), and 2.68 events/patient/month (95% CI = -3.58 to -1.78), respectively. Periprocedural adverse events occurred in 1.23% of patients and no significant changes were seen in blood pressure or renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with refractory VAs, RDN was associated with a reduction in the number of VAs and ICD therapies, and was shown to be a safe procedure.

Renal sympathetic denervation for the treatment of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias-ELECTRAM investigators

INTRODUCTION

Renal sympathetic denervation (RSDN) is an alternate management approach for refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We aimed to perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes on the impact of RSDN on refractory VA patients.

METHODS

A systematic search without language restriction, using PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to August 18, 2020, was performed for the studies that reported outcomes in patients who underwent RSDN for VA. The outcomes studied were-(1) recurrent VA; and (2) all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Five studies (from 2014 to 2018) with a total of 51 VA patients met study inclusion criteria. The mean age was 61.92 ± 11.76 years, and 78.4% were men. The pooled incidence of short-term (3 months or less) and long-term (more than 3 months) VA recurrence was 63.85% (95% CI 16.75 to 99.32) and 10.52% (95% CI 0.14 to 28.75), respectively. When stratified by the number of VA episodes, there was a significant reduction in mean VA episodes (SMD -3.79, 95% CI -6.59 to -0.98, p < .01), ICD shocks (SMD -1.71, 95% CI -3.0 to -0.42, p < .01) and anti-tachycardia pacing (SMD -1.21, 95% CI -1.98 to -0.44, p < .01) following RSDN denervation. The pooled incidence of all-cause mortality after RSDN was 10.16% (95% CI 1.08 to 24.12). There were no major vascular complications, one minor vascular complication-small non-flow limiting renal artery dissection (no intervention needed).

CONCLUSION

RSDN appears to be a safe and effective treatment strategy in patients with prior failed antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation for recurrent ventricular arrhythmia and electrical storm.

Renal Denervation for the Management of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) in patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VA) or electrical storm (ES).

BACKGROUND

Although catheter ablation is efficacious for the treatment of structural heart disease ventricular tachycardia (VT), there are proportion of patients who have refractory VT despite multiple procedures. In this setting, novel adjunctive therapies such as renal denervation have been performed.

METHODS

A systematic review of published data was performed. Studies that evaluated patients undergoing RDN for VA or ES were included. Outcome measures of VA, sudden cardiac death, ES, or device therapy were required. Case reports, editorials, and conference presentations were excluded. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted to explore change or final mean values in the study outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 328 articles were identified by the literature search. Seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review, with a total of 121 pooled patients. The weighted mean age was 63.8 ± 13.1 years, ejection fraction 30.5 ± 10.3%, 76% were men, 99% were on a beta blocker, 79% were on amiodarone, 46% had previously undergone catheter ablation, and 8.3% had previously undergone cardiac sympathetic denervation. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant effect of RDN in reducing implantable cardiac defibrillator therapies, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -3.11 (p < 0.001). RDN also reduced the number of VA episodes (SMD -2.13; p < 0.001), antitachycardia pacing episodes (SMD -2.82; p = 0.002), and shocks (SMD -2.82; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

RDN is an effective treatment for refractory VAs and ES, although randomized data are lacking.

Sympathetic Denervation for Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with heart disease. A growing understanding of the cardiac autonomic nervous system's crucial role in the pathogenesis of ventricular arrhythmias has led to the development of several neuromodulation therapies. Sympathetic neuromodulation is being increasingly utilized to treat ventricular arrhythmias refractory to medical therapy and catheter ablation. There is a growing body of preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of thoracic epidural anesthesia, stellate ganglion blockade, cardiac sympathetic denervation, and renal denervation in the treatment of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. This review summarizes the relevant literature and discusses approaches to sympathetic neuromodulation, particularly in the management of scar-related ventricular arrhythmias.

Ablation of Neuroaxial in Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) remains a common cause of sudden cardiac death. It is widely accepted that VTs are strongly associated with autonomic imbalance with reduced vagal and increased sympathetic activities. Pharmacologic therapy remains the first-line therapy, but antiarrhythmic agents may not be effective or carry significant side effects. Sympathetic denervation is an emerging therapy to prevent or treat VTs by rebalancing the sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. This article focuses on the role of sympathetic activation in VT, and the mapping and ablation of sympathetic nervous system in patients with VT.

The autonomic nervous system and ventricular arrhythmias in myocardial infarction and heart failure

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) can range in presentation from asymptomatic to cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Sustained ventricular tachycardias/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) are a common cause of SCD in the setting of myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure. A particularly arrhythmogenic cardiac syncytia in these conditions can be attributed to both sympathetic activation and parasympathetic dysfunction, while appropriate neuromodulation has the potential to reduce occurrence of VT/VF. In this review, we outline the components of the autonomic nervous system that play an important role in normal cardiac electrophysiology and function. In addition, we discuss changes that occur in the setting of cardiac disease including adverse neural remodeling and neurohormonal activation which significantly contribute to propensity for VT/VF. Finally, we review neuromodulation strategies to mitigate VT/VF which predominantly rely on increasing parasympathetic drive and blockade of sympathetic neurotransmission.

Renal denervation as adjunctive therapy to cardiac sympathetic denervation for ablation refractory ventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Autonomic modulation is finding an increasing role in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. Renal denervation (RDN) has been described as a treatment modality for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) in case series.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate RDN as an adjunctive therapy to cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) for ablation refractory VT.

METHODS

Patients who underwent RDN after radiofrequency ablation and CSD procedures at our center from 2012 to 2019 were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent RDN after CSD (9 bilateral and 1 left-sided only) with a median follow-up of 23 months. The mean age was 59.9 ± 10.4 years, and 9/10 (90%) were men. All had cardiomyopathy with a mean ejection fraction of 33% ± 11% (20% ischemic). Four (40%) underwent CSD during the same hospitalization as that for RDN. Patients who underwent RDN as adjunctive therapy to CSD had a decrease in all implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies (shocks + antitachycardia pacing [ATP]) from 29.5 ± 25.2 to 7.1 ± 10.1 comparing 6 months pre-RDN to 6 months post-RDN (P = .028). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks were significantly decreased from 7.0 ± 6.1 to 1.7 ± 2.5 comparing 6 months pre-RDN to 6 months post-RDN (P = .026). This benefit was driven by a decrease in therapies for 6 patients who had a staged procedure, not performed during the same hospitalization (28.5 ± 24.3 to 1.0 ± 1.2; P = .043).

CONCLUSION

RDN demonstrates the potential benefit when VT recurs after radiofrequency ablation and CSD. The benefit is seen in patients who undergo a staged procedure. The need for acute RDN after CSD portends a poor prognosis.

Neuromodulation for Ventricular Tachycardia and Atrial Fibrillation: A Clinical Scenario-Based Review

Autonomic dysregulation in cardiovascular disease plays a major role in the pathogenesis of arrhythmias. Cardiac neural control relies on complex feedback loops consisting of efferent and afferent limbs, which carry sympathetic and parasympathetic signals from the brain to the heart and sensory signals from the heart to the brain. Cardiac disease leads to neural remodeling and sympathovagal imbalances with arrhythmogenic effects. Preclinical studies of modulation at central and peripheral levels of the cardiac autonomic nervous system have yielded promising results, leading to early stage clinical studies of these techniques in atrial fibrillation and refractory ventricular arrhythmias, particularly in patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes and structural heart disease. However, significant knowledge gaps in basic cardiac neurophysiology limit the success of these neuromodulatory therapies. This review discusses the recent advances in neuromodulation for cardiac arrhythmia management, with a clinical scenario-based approach aimed at bringing neurocardiology closer to the realm of the clinical electrophysiologist.

Neuromodulation Approaches for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Recent Advances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to describe the latest advances in autonomic neuromodulation approaches to treating cardiac arrhythmias, with a focus on ventricular arrhythmias.

RECENT FINDINGS

The increasing understanding of neuronal remodeling in cardiac diseases has led to the development and improvement of novel neuromodulation therapies targeting multiple levels of the autonomic nervous system. Thoracic epidural anesthesia, spinal cord stimulation, stellate ganglion modulatory therapies, vagal stimulation, renal denervation, and interventions on the intracardiac nervous system have all been studied in preclinical models, with encouraging preliminary clinical data. The autonomic nervous system regulates all the electrical processes of the heart and plays an important role in the pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias. Despite recent advances in the clinical application of cardiac neuromodulation, our comprehension of the anatomy and function of the cardiac autonomic nervous system is still limited. Hopefully in the near future, more preclinical data combined with larger clinical trials will lead to further improvements in neuromodulatory treatment for heart rhythm disorders.

Substrates and potential therapeutics of ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome characterized by ventricular contractile dysfunction. About 50% of death in patients with HF are due to fetal ventricular arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Understanding ventricular arrhythmic substrates and discovering effective antiarrhythmic interventions are extremely important for improving the prognosis of patients with HF and reducing its mortality. In this review, we discussed ventricular arrhythmic substrates and current clinical therapeutics for ventricular arrhythmias in HF. Base on the fact that classic antiarrhythmic drugs have the limited efficacy, side effects, and proarrhythmic potentials, we also updated some therapeutic strategies for the development of potential new antiarrhythmic interventions for patients with HF.

Cardiac autonomic innervation

The autonomic nervous system plays a key role in regulating changes in the cardiovascular system and its adaptation to various human body functions. The sympathetic arm of the autonomic nervous system is associated with the fight and flight response, while the parasympathetic division is responsible for the restorative effects on heart rate, blood pressure, and contractility. Disorders involving these two divisions can lead to, and are seen as, a manifestation of most common cardiovascular disorders. Over the last few decades, extensive research has been performed establishing imaging techniques to quantify the autonomic dysfunction associated with various cardiovascular disorders. Additionally, several techniques have been tested with variable success in modulating the cardiac autonomic nervous system as treatment for these disorders. In this review, we summarize basic anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the cardiac autonomic nervous system including adrenergic receptors. We have also discussed several imaging modalities available to aid in diagnosis of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and autonomic modulation techniques, including pharmacologic and device-based therapies, that have been or are being tested currently.