In-Hospital Outcomes of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock at Safety-Net Hospitals in the United States (from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample)

Clinical and financial outcomes of pulmonary resection for lung cancer in safety-net hospitals

OBJECTIVE

Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) have previously been associated with inferior outcomes and greater resource use. However, this relationship has not been explored in the contemporary setting of pulmonary lobectomy. In the present national study we characterized the association between SNHs and mortality, complications, and resource use.

METHODS

All adults (18 years of age or older) who underwent elective lobectomy for lung cancer were identified within the 2010 to 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hospitals in the highest quartile of safety-net burden were categorized as SNHs, and others non-SNHs. Multivariable regressions were developed to assess the independent association between safety-net status and outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 282,011 patients who met inclusion criteria, 41,015 (14.5%) were treated at SNHs. Patients at SNHs were younger but as commonly female, compared with non-SNHs. After multivariable adjustment, there was no association between SNHs and mortality. However, treatment at SNHs was linked to higher odds of pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.21) and prolonged ventilation (AOR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.11-1.66), as well as infectious (AOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43), intraoperative (AOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.39), and overall complications (AOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14). Patients at SNHs also showed a greater need for a blood transfusion (AOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.23-1.53). In addition, SNHs were associated with increased length of stay (+0.33 days; 95% CI, 0.17-0.48) and greater costs (+$4130; 95% CI, 3.34-4.92), relative to non-SNHs.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital safety-net status was associated with greater odds of perioperative complications and greater health care expenditure. Further investigation is necessary uncover the mechanisms contributing to these complications and eradicate persistent disparities in lobectomy.

Invasive Management and In-Hospital Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction Patients in United States Safety-Net Hospitals

AIM

Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) look after a higher proportion of uninsured patients and are often located in deprived areas. This study aimed to determine whether there are differences in the clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in SNHs versus non-SNHs (N-SNHs).

METHODS

All hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of AMI in the United States' National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2019 were stratified by safety-net hospital status. Multivariable logistic regression with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) was conducted to investigate invasive management and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 2,544,009 weighted discharge records were analyzed, including 601,719 records from SNHs (23.7 %). Compared with N-SNHs, SNH AMI patients were younger (median 66 years vs. 67 years, p < 0.001), and had a higher proportion in the lowest quartile of median household income (37.3 % vs. 28.5 %, p < 0.001). Patients from SNHs were less likely to receive coronary angiography (aOR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.91-0.93, p < 0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (aOR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.93-0.95, p < 0.001), and coronary artery bypass grafting (aOR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.92-0.94, p < 0.001). In addition, they had increased all-cause mortality (aOR 1.11, 95 % CI 1.09-1.12, p < 0.001), major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (composite of mortality, stroke and reinfarction) (aOR 1.11, 95 % CI 1.09-1.12, p < 0.001), and stroke (aOR 1.11, 95 % CI 1.08-1.14, p < 0.001), while there was no difference in major bleeding (aOR 1.02, 95 % CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.107).

CONCLUSION

Among AMI patients, treatment in SNHs was associated with lower utilization of coronary angiography and revascularization and worse clinical outcomes.

Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Uninsured Compared With Privately Insured Individuals

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on uninsured patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This study sought to compare the management and outcomes of AMI-CS between uninsured and privately insured individuals.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2016), a retrospective cohort of adult (≥18 years) uninsured admissions (primary payer-self-pay or no charge) were compared with privately insured individuals. Interhospital transfers were excluded. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, temporal trends in admissions, use of cardiac procedures, do-not-resuscitate status, palliative care referrals, and resource utilization.

RESULTS

Of 402 182 AMI-CS admissions, 21 966 (5.4%) and 93 814 (23.3%) were uninsured and privately insured. Compared with private insured individuals, uninsured admissions were younger, male, from a lower socioeconomic status, had lower comorbidity, higher rates of acute organ failure, ST-segment elevation AMI-CS (77.3% versus 76.4%), and concomitant cardiac arrest (33.8% versus 31.9%; all P<0.001). Compared with 2000, in 2016, there were more uninsured (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.13-1.17]; P<0.001) and less privately insured admissions (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.83-0.87]; P<0.001). Uninsured individuals received less frequent coronary angiography (79.5% versus 81.0%), percutaneous coronary intervention (60.8% versus 62.2%), mechanical circulatory support (54% versus 55.5%), and had higher palliative care (3.8% versus 3.2%) and do-not-resuscitate status use (4.4% versus 3.2%; all P<0.001). Uninsured admissions had higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.55-1.68]; P<0.001) and resource utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Uninsured individuals have higher in-hospital mortality and lower use of guideline-directed therapies in AMI-CS compared with privately insured individuals.

Institutional Characteristics and Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock in Japan - Analysis From the JROAD/JROAD-DPC Database

BACKGROUND

The high mortality of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with cardiogenic shock (i.e., Killip class IV AMI) remains a challenge in emergency cardiovascular care. This study aimed to examine institutional factors, including the number of JCS board-certified members, that are independently associated with the prognosis of Killip class IV AMI patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the Japanese registry of all cardiac and vascular diseases-diagnosis procedure combination (JROAD-DPC) database (years 2012-2016), the 30-day mortality of Killip class IV AMI patients (n=21,823) was 42.3%. Multivariate analysis identified age, female sex, admission by ambulance, deep coma, and cardiac arrest as patient factors that were independently associated with higher 30-day mortality, and the numbers of JCS board-certified members and of intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) cases per year as institutional factors that were independently associated with lower mortality in Killip class IV patients, although IABP was associated with higher mortality in Killip classes I-III patients. Among hospitals with the highest quartile (≥9 JCS board-certified members), the 30-day mortality of Killip class IV patients was 37.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher numbers of JCS board-certified members was associated with better survival of Killip class IV AMI patients. This finding may provide a clue to optimizing local emergency medical services for better management of AMI patients in Japan.

Outcomes and Resource Use Associated With Acute Respiratory Failure in Safety Net Hospitals Across the United States

BACKGROUND

Despite the frequency and cost of hospitalizations for acute respiratory failure (ARF), the literature regarding the impact of hospital safety net burden on outcomes of these hospitalizations is sparse.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does safety net burden impact outcomes of ARF hospitalizations such as mortality, tracheostomy, and resource use?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample 2007-2017. All patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ARF were tabulated using the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th Revision codes, and safety net burden was calculated using previously published methodology. High- and low-burden hospitals were generated from proportions of Medicaid and uninsured patients. Trends were analyzed using a nonparametric rank-based test, whereas multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to establish associations of safety net burden with key clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 8,941,334 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of ARF, 33.9% were categorized as occurring at low-burden hospitals (LBHs) and 31.6% were categorized as occurring at high-burden hospitals (HBHs). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased at HBHs (22.8%-12.6%; nonparametric trend [nptrend] < .001) and LBHs (22.0%-10.9%; nptrend < .001) over the study period, as did tracheostomy placement (HBH, 5.6%-1.3%; LBH, 3.5%-0.8%; all nptrend <.001). After adjustment for patient and hospital factors, an HBH was associated with increased odds of mortality (adjusted OR [AOR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.10-1.12) and tracheostomy use (AOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.29-1.37), as well as greater hospitalization costs (β coefficient, +$1,083; 95% CI, $882-$1,294) and longer lengths of stay (β coefficient, +3.3 days; 95% CI, 3.2-3.3 days).

INTERPRETATION

After accounting for differences between patient cohorts, high safety net burden was associated independently with inferior clinical outcomes and increased costs after ARF hospitalizations. These findings emphasize the need for health care reform to ameliorate disparities within these safety net centers, which treat our most vulnerable populations.

Safety-net hospitals versus non-safety centers and clinical outcomes after trans-catheter aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVE

To compare post-procedural outcomes of trans-catheter valve replacement (TAVR) among safety-net (SNH) and non-safety net hospitals (non-SNH).

BACKGROUND

SNH treat a large population of un-insured and low income patients; prior studies report worse outcome at these centers. Results of TAVR at these centers is limited.

METHODS

Adults undergoing TAVR at hospitals in the US participating in the National In-patient sample (NIS) database from January 2014 to December 2015 were included. A 1:1 propensity-matched cohort of patients operated at SNH and non-SNH institutions was analyzed, on the basis of 16 demographic and clinical co-variates. Main outcome was all-cause post-procedural mortality. Secondary outcomes included stroke, acute kidney injury and length of post-operative stay.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2015, 41,410 patients (mean age 80 ± 0.11 years, 46% female) underwent TAVR at 731 centers; 6,996 (16.80%) procedures were performed at SNH comprising 135/731 (18.4%) of all centers performing TAVR. SNH patients were more likely to be female (49% vs. 46%, p < .001); admitted emergently (31% vs. 21%; p < .001; at the lowest quartile for household income (25% % vs. 20%; p < .001) and from minorities (Blacks 5.9% vs. 3.9%; Hispanic 7.2% vs. 3.2%).Adjusted logistic regression was performed on 6,995 propensity-matched patient pairs. Post-procedural mortality [OR 0.99(0.98-1.007); p = .43], stroke [OR 1.009(0.99-1.02); p = .08], acute kidney injury [OR 0.99(0.96-1.01); p = .5] and overall length of stay (6.9 ± 0.1 vs. 7.1 ± 0.2 days; p = .57) were comparable in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Post-procedural outcomes after TAVR at SNH are comparable to national outcomes and wider adoption of TAVR at SNH may not adversely influence outcomes.

Social determinants of health affect unplanned readmissions following acute myocardial infarction

Background: Low socioeconomic status predicts inferior clinical outcomes in many patient populations. The effects of patient insurance status and hospital safety-net status on readmission rates following acute myocardial infarction are unclear. Materials & methods: A retrospective review of State Inpatient Databases for New York, California, Florida and Maryland, 2007-2014. Results: A total of 1,055,162 patients were included. Medicaid status was associated with 37.7 and 44.0% increases in risk-adjusted readmission odds at 30 and 90 days (p < 0.0001). Uninsured status was associated with reduced odds of readmission at both time points. High-burden safety-net status was associated with 9.6 and 9.5% increased odds of readmission at 30 and 90 days (p < 0.0003). Conclusion: Insurance status and hospital safety-net burden affect readmission odds following acute myocardial infarction.

Incidence and clinical outcomes of nosocomial infections in patients presenting with STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock in the United States

OBJECTIVES

This study addresses the incidence, trends, and impact of nosocomial infections (NI) on the outcomes of patients admitted with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) using the United States National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 105,184 STEMI-CS patients using the NIS database from the years 2005-2014. NI was defined as infections of more than or equal to three days, comprising of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), urinary tract infection (UTI), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), bacteremia, and skin related infections. Outcomes of the impact of NI on STEMI-CS included in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS) and costs. Significant associations of NI in patients admitted with STEMI-CS were also identified.

RESULTS

Overall, 19.1% (20,137) of patients admitted with STEMI-CS developed NI. Trends of NI have decreased from 2005-2014. The most common NI were UTI (9.2%), followed by HAP (6.8%), CLABSI (1.5%), bacteremia (1.5%), skin related infections (1.5%), and CDI (1.3%). The strongest association of developing a NI was increasing LOS (7-9 days; OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.75-2.26; >9 days; OR: 4.51; 95% CI: 4.04-5.04 compared to 4-6 days as reference). Increased mortality risk among patients with NI was significant, especially those with sepsis-associated NI compared to those without sepsis (OR: 2.95; 95% CI: 2.72-3.20). Patients with NI were found to be associated with significantly longer LOS and higher costs, irrespective of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support placement.

CONCLUSIONS

NI were common among patients with STEMI-CS. Those who developed NI were at a greater risk of in-hospital mortality, increased LOS and costs.