Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy

The Learning Curve for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Experience of a Single Surgeon

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex and high-skill demanding procedure often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the results have improved over the past two decades. However, there is a paucity of research concerning the learning curve for PD. Our aim was to report the outcomes of 100 consecutive PDs representing a single surgeon's learning curve and to depict the factors that influenced the learning process.

METHODS

We reviewed the first 121 PDs performed at our academic center (2013-2019) by a single surgeon; 110 were PDs (5 laparoscopic and 105 open) and 11 were total PDs (1 laparoscopic and 10 open). Subsequent statistics was performed on the first 100 PDs, with attention paid to the learning curve and survival rate at 5 years. The data were analyzed comparing the first 50 cases (Group 1) to the last 50 cases (Group 2).

RESULTS

The most frequent histopathological tumor type was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (50%). A total of 39% of patients had preoperative biliary drainage and 45% presented with positive biliary cultures. The preferred reconstruction technique included pancreaticogastrostomy (99%), in situ hepaticojejunostomy (70%), and precolic gastro-jejunal anastomosis (88%). Postoperative complications included biliary fistula (1%), pancreatic fistula (8%), pancreatic stump bleeding (4%), and delayed gastric emptying (13%). The mean operative time decreased after the first 50 cases (p < 0.001) and blood loss after 60 cases (p = 0.046). R1 resections lowered after 25 cases (p = 0.025). Vascular resections (17%) did not influence the rate of complications (p = 0.8). The survival rate at 5 years for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 32.93%.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes improve as surgeon experience increases, with proper training being the most important factor for minimizing the impact of the learning curve over the postoperative complications. Analyzing the learning curve from the perspective of a single surgeon is mandatory for accurate statistical results and interpretation.

Quality Performance Indicators for the Surgical Management of Oesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The objective of this systematic review was to identify pre-existing quality performance indicators (QPIs) for the surgical management of oesophageal cancer (OC). These QPIs can be used to objectively measure and compare the performance of individual units and capture key elements of patient care to improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and Embase was conducted. Articles reporting on the quality of healthcare in relation to oesophageal neoplasm or cancer and the surgical treatment of OC available until the 1st of March 2022 were included.

RESULTS

The final list of articles included retrospective reviews (n = 13), prospective reviews (n = 8), expert guidelines (n = 1) and consensus (n = 1). The final list of QPIs was categorized as process, outcome or structural measures. Process measures included multidisciplinary involvement, availability of multimodality diagnostic and treatment pathways and surgical metrics. Outcome measures included reoperation and readmission rates, the achievement of RO resection and length of hospital stay. Structural measures include multidisciplinary meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review summarizes QPIs for the surgical treatment of OC. The data will serve as an introduction to establishing a quality initiative project for OC resections.

Whipple’s operation with a modified centralization concept: A model in low-volume Caribbean centers

Conventional data suggest that complex operations, such as a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), should be limited to high volume centers. However, this is not practical in small, resource-poor countries in the Caribbean. In these settings, patients have no option but to have their PDs performed locally at low volumes, occasionally by general surgeons. In this paper, we review the evolution of the concept of the high-volume center and discuss the feasibility of applying this concept to low and middle-income nations. Specifically, we discuss a modification of this concept that may be considered when incorporating PD into low-volume and resource-poor countries, such as those in the Caribbean. This paper has two parts. First, we performed a literature review evaluating studies published on outcomes after PD in high volume centers. The data in the Caribbean is then examined and we discuss the incorporation of this operation into resource-poor hospitals with modifications of the centralization concept. In the authors’ opinions, most patients who require PD in the Caribbean do not have realistic opportunities to have surgery in high-volume centers in developed countries. In these settings, their only options are to have their operations in the resource-poor, low-volume settings in the Caribbean. However, post-operative outcomes may be improved, despite low-volumes, if a modified centralization concept is encouraged.

The Role of Simulation in Attaining Proficiency in Minimally Invasive Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery

The implementation of robotic surgery in the field of hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) has been a slow but significant process. HPB procedures offer a unique challenge when for new technologies, as the surgeries themselves are complex, with long learning curves. Yet the benefits of the robotic approach for this patient population are notable: decreased length of stay, blood loss, postoperative complications, and improving quality of life. The use of robotic simulation focused curriculum plays a crucial role in mentoring experienced surgeons and surgical trainees. Although further study remains, early studies suggest a structured simulation curriculum decreases time, technical errors, and improves proficiency, ultimately leading to a more expedited and safe implementation of robotic techniques in the HPB field.

One hundred sixty pancreaticoduodenectomies for periampullary cancers in a growing-volume setting: a single-institution and a single-surgeon's experience

Purpose

Many studies have concluded that cancer patients may have better outcomes when their surgery is performed in high-volume centers, especially when the procedure is pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, some studies concluded that experienced surgeons or incorporation of expertise from high-volume centers may achieve satisfactory outcomes after PD in low-volume centers.

Methods

I retrospectively collected and analyzed the outcomes of PD for periampullary cancers treated with curative intent in my center.

Results

From August 2, 2005 to December 10, 2018, 160 pancreatic resections were done with curative intent in my center. The number of operations per year was 1 in 2005 and gradually increased to 21 in 2018. Thirty-day mortality was 0, and 90-day mortality was 1 (0.6%). Morbidity was found in 65 cases (40.6%). The median follow-up period was 23.2 months and 5-year survival rates were 28.5% for pancreas head cancer, 48.2% for distal CBD cancer, and 72.6% for AOV cancer. I divided patients into 2 groups by the number of annual operations, which is more than 21 per 2 years. The 2 groups showed no differences in terms of morbidity and mortality.

Conclusion

A well-trained low-volume surgeon may perform PD safely at a well-equipped low-volume center.

Surgical Loupe at 4.0× Magnification in Pancreaticoduodenectomy-Does It Affect the Surgical Outcomes? A Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

There is paucity of data about the impact of using magnification on rate of pancreatic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The aim of this study was to show the impact of using magnifying surgical loupes 4.0× EF (electro-focus) on technical performance and surgical outcomes of PD.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

This is a propensity score-matched study. Thirty patients underwent PD using surgical loupes at 4.0× magnification (Group A), and 60 patients underwent PD using the conventional method (Group B). The primary outcome was postoperative pancreatic fistula. Secondary outcomes included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

The total operative time was significantly longer in the loupe group ( P = .0001). The operative time for pancreatic reconstruction was significantly longer in the loupe group ( P = .0001). There were no significant differences between both groups regarding hospital stay, time to oral intake, total amount of drainage, and time of nasogastric tube removal. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated 3 independent factors of development of postoperative pancreatic fistula: pancreatic duct <3 mm, body mass index >25, and soft pancreas.

CONCLUSION

Surgical loupes 4.0× added no advantage in surgical outcomes of PD with regard to improvement of postoperative complications rate or mortality rate.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy: minimizing the learning curve

Background

Pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes improve as surgeon experience increases. We analyzed the outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy for any improvements over time to assess the learning curve.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients undergoing consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy by a single surgeon at the beginning of practice was performed. Operative factors and 90-day outcomes were examined and trends over the course of the 4-year time period were analyzed.

Results

Between July 2011 and June 2015, 124 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (including total pancreatectomy, n=17) by open (n=93) or a laparoscopic (n=31) approach. The median operative time was 305 minutes which significantly improved over time. The median blood loss and length of stay were 250 mL and 6 days respectively which did not change over time. The pancreatic fistula rate, total morbidity, major morbidity, and mortality, and readmission rate was 7.5%, 41.1%, 14.5%, 1.6%, and 15.3% respectively and did not change over time. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed most commonly for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (51.6%) with a negative margin rate of 91.1% which significantly improved over time.

Conclusions

The performance of pancreaticoduodenectomy improves as surgical experience is gained. However, a learning curve that impacts patient outcomes can be considerably diminished by appropriate training, high-volume practice/institution, proficient mentorship and experienced multidisciplinary team.

[A single-team experience with robotic pancreatic surgery in 1010 cases]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and advantages of robotic pancreatic surgery (RPS) based on the single-team experience with 1010 cases.

METHODS

The clinical data of 1010 cases of RPS performed by a single team from November, 2011 to September, 2017 in our hospital were collected prospectively and analyzed. In most of cases the surgeries were performed using the third-generation da Vinci robotic surgical system.

RESULTS

The 1010 cases receiving RPS included 417 cases of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD), 428 cases of robotic distal pancreatectomy, 60 cases of robotic central pancreatectomy, 53 cases of robotic pancreatic tumor enucleation, 3 cases of Appleby procedure, and 49 cases of other operations (including 4 cases of innovative robotic retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery, 4 cases of robotic pancreatic tumor enucleation combined with main pancreatic duct bridging repair, 1 case of single incision robotic pancreatic tumor enucleation, and 2 cases of robotic central pancreatectomy combined with end-to-end anastomosis reconstruction). The median operative time was 210 min (30-720 min) with a median intraoperative blood loss of 80 mL (10-2000 mL), a conversion rate of 4.06% (41/1010), a blood transfusion rate of 6.7% (68/1010), a mean post-operative stay of 10.87∓6.70 days, a complication rate (beyond grade III according to Clavien-Dindo scoring system) of 8.0% (81/1010), and a pancreatic fistula rate (beyond) grade B of 9.21% (93/1010). The mortality rate of the patients was 0.69% (7/1010) in 30 days and 1.31% (12//934) in 90 days. The application of RPS in total pancreatectomy increased steadily from the rate of 10.44% in 2012 to 72.06% in 2017.

CONCLUSION

This represents to our knowledge the world largest series of robotic pancreatic resections. RPS is expected to gradually replace open procedure and laparoscopic procedure to become the primary choice of approach for pancreatectomy. After the learning curve, RPS procedure including distal pancreatectomy, robotic Appleby procedure and other operations can be safely performed, and the experiences from other centers can be beneficial to reduce severe complications in the early stage of learning.

Endoscopic esophagogastric anastomosis with luminal apposition Axios stent (LAS) approach: a new concept for hybrid "Lewis Santy"

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Esophagogastric anastomosis (EGA) has a high risk of leakage. Based upon our experience in endoscopic gastrojejunal anastomosis using LAS, the aim of this study was to verify the technical feasibility and the safety of performing an EGA using a hybrid approach (endoscopic and surgical).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pilot prospective study was performed on 8 survival pigs. The procedure was carried out in 2 stages: (i) surgical step consisting of an esogastrectomy by laparotomy with separated suture of the esophagus and stomach; (ii) endoscopic esophagogastric anastomosis using the LAS. The first 2 pigs allowed for the setting of the 2 steps procedure, and 6 were included in the study for assessing the efficacy and safety of the procedure with a 3-week survival course. The primary endpoint was morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfull. The mean operative time was 98 minutes, with a mean endoscopic time of 46 minutes. Three early deaths occurred within the first weeks, unrelated to the LAS anastomosis. At 3 weeks, endoscopic assessment followed by necropsy demonstrated the right position and the endoscopic removability of the stent with good patency of the esophagogastric anastomosis, without leakage of the endoscopic suture. Pathological examination confirmed the patency of the anastomosis with fusion of mucosal and muscle layers.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic esophagogastric anastomosis with LAS is feasible and reproducible, without anastomotic leakage. It could be a new alternative to perform safe anastomoses, as part of a hybrid approach (surgical and endoscopic).

Maximum surgical blood order schedule for pancreatoduodenectomy: a long way from uniform applicability!

BACKGROUND

Unnecessary preoperative ordering of blood and blood products results in wastage of a valuable life-saving resource and poses a significant financial burden on healthcare systems.

AIM

To determine patient-specific factors associated with intra-operative transfusions, and if intra-operative blood transfusions impact postoperative morbidity.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Analysis of consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic tumors.

RESULTS

A total of 384 patients underwent a classical PD with an estimated median blood loss of 200 cc and percentage transfused being 9.6%. Pre-existing hypertension, synchronous vascular resection, end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy and nodal disease burden significantly associated with the need for intra-operative transfusions. Intra-operative blood transfusion not associated with postoperative morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Optimization of MSBOS protocols for PD is required for more judicious use of blood products.

Achieving good perioperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-volume setting: a 25-year experience

Perioperative mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy has improved over time and is lower than 5% in selected high-volume centers. Based on several large literature series on pancreaticoduodenectomy from high-volume centers, some defend that high annual volumes are necessary for good outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. We report here the outcomes of a low annual volume pancreaticoduodenectomy series after incorporating technical expertise from a high-volume center. We included all patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy performed by a single surgeon (ADC.) as treatment for periampullary malignancies from 1981 to 2005. Outcomes of this series were compared to those of 3 high-volume literature series. Additionally, outcomes for first 10 cases in the present series were compared to those of all 37 remaining cases in this series. A total of 47 pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed over a 25-year period. Overall in-hospital mortality was 2 cases (4.3%), and morbidity occurred in 23 patients (48.9%). Both mortality and morbidity were similar to those of each of the three high-volume center comparison series. Comparison of the outcomes for the first 10 to the remaining 37 cases in this series revealed that the latter 37 cases had inferior mortality (20% versus 0%; P = 0.042), less tumor-positive margins (50 versus 13.5%; P = 0.024), less use of intraoperative blood transfusions (90% versus 32.4%; P = 0.003), and tendency to a shorter length of in-hospital stay (20 versus 15.8 days; P = 0.053). Accumulation of surgical experience and incorporation of expertise from high-volume centers may enable achieving satisfactory outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in low-volume settings whenever referral to a high-volume center is limited.

Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Pancreatic Surgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols were first introduced to help recovery after colorectal surgery. They have now been applied to multiple surgical specialties, including pancreatic surgery. ERAS protocols in pancreatic surgery have been shown to decrease length of stay and possibly postoperative morbidity.

Outcome after Transthoracic Resection of Carcinoma of the Oesophagus and Oesophago-Gastric Junction

Aims:

To assess the postoperative morbidity and mortality, length of stay and long-term survival after resection of carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction, after establishment of a new surgical team unit between thoracic and gastroenterologic surgeons.

Methods:

We analysed the prospective collected data of 166 consecutive patients who underwent a transthoracic oesophageal resection between June 1997 and December 2003.

Results:

There were 119 men and 47 women. The median age was 63 years (range 36–81). Fifty-five patients (33 %) had squamous cell carcinoma and 111 (67 %) had adenocarcinoma. Postoperative complications occurred in a total of 60 patients (36 %). Ten patients (6 %) died postoperatively, eight (4.8 %) due to medical and two (1.2 %) due to surgical complications. The median postoperative length of stay was 11 days (range 6–75). The overall 3- and 5- years survival was 35.6 % and 30.6 % respectively. Survival was adversely affected by patient age and tumor stage.

Conclusions:

Concentrating resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction to a dedicated team of specialists, including both gastrointestinal and thoracic surgeons as well as thoracic-anaesthesiological know-how, results in acceptable complication rates as well as low mortality rates especially due to surgical complications.

Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer

Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative therapy for pancreatic cancer, despite a high rate of systemic recurrence. Because of local invasion or distant spread, a minority of patients presenting with pancreatic cancer are candidates for surgery. Although perioperative mortality is low in high-volume settings, pancreatic surgery remains associated with considerable morbidity. Minimally invasive and robotic surgical techniques are increasingly used for pancreatic resection, although not always applicable to all patients. Strategies to extend the benefits of margin-negative surgical resection to more patients include surgery with vascular resection and reconstruction for locally invasive tumors, and resection after neoadjuvant therapy.

Assessing the experience in complex hepatopancreatobiliary surgery among graduating chief residents: is the operative experience enough?

INTRODUCTION

Resident operative autonomy and case volume is associated with posttraining confidence and practice plans. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for graduating general surgery residents are four liver and three pancreas cases. We sought to evaluate trends in resident experience and autonomy for complex hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery over time.

METHODS

We queried the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education General Surgery Case Log (2003-2012) for all cases performed by graduating chief residents (GCR) relating to liver, pancreas, and the biliary tract (HPB); simple cholecystectomy was excluded. Mean (±SD), median [10th-90th percentiles] and maximum case volumes were compared from 2003 to 2012 using R(2) for all trends.

RESULTS

A total of 252,977 complex HPB cases (36% liver, 43% pancreas, 21% biliary) were performed by 10,288 GCR during the 10-year period examined (Mean = 24.6 per GCR). Of these, 57% were performed during the chief year, whereas 43% were performed as postgraduate year 1-4. Only 52% of liver cases were anatomic resections, whereas 71% of pancreas cases were major resections. Total number of cases increased from 22,516 (mean = 23.0) in 2003 to 27,191 (mean = 24.9) in 2012. During this same time period, the percentage of HPB cases that were performed during the chief year decreased by 7% (liver: 13%, pancreas 8%, biliary 4%). There was an increasing trend in the mean number of operations (mean ± SD) logged by GCR on the pancreas (9.1 ± 5.9 to 11.3 ± 4.3; R(2) = .85) and liver (8.0 ± 5.9 to 9.4 ± 3.4; R(2) = .91), whereas those for the biliary tract decreased (5.9 ± 2.5 to 3.8 ± 2.1; R(2) = .96). Although the median number of cases [10th:90th percentile] increased slightly for both pancreas (7.0 [4.0:15] to 8.0 [4:20]) and liver (7.0 [4:13] to 8.0 [5:14]), the maximum number of cases preformed by any given GCR remained stable for pancreas (51 to 53; R(2) = .18), but increased for liver (38 to 45; R(2) = .32). The median number of HPB cases that GCR performed as teaching assistants (TAs) remained at zero during this time period. The 90th percentile of cases performed as TA was less than two for both pancreas and liver.

CONCLUSION

Roughly one-half of GCR have performed fewer than 10 cases in each of the liver, pancreas, or biliary categories at time of completion of residency. Although the mean number of complex liver and pancreatic operations performed by GCR increased slightly, the median number remained low, and the number of TA cases was virtually zero. Most GCR are unlikely to be prepared to perform complex HPB operations.

A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (CR-POPF) are serious inherent risks of pancreatic resection. Preoperative CR-POPF risk assessment is currently inadequate and rarely disqualifies patients who need resection. The best evaluation of risk occurs intraoperatively, and should guide fistula prevention and response measures thereafter. We sought to develop a risk prediction tool for CR-POPF that features intraoperative assessment and reveals associated clinical and economic significance.

STUDY DESIGN

Based on International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification, recognized risk factors for CR-POPF (small duct, soft pancreas, high-risk pathology, excessive blood loss) were evaluated during pancreaticoduodenectomy. An optimal risk score range model, selected from 3 different constructs, was first derived (n = 233) and then validated prospectively (n = 212). Clinical and economic outcomes were evaluated across 4 ranges of scores (negligible risk, 0 points; low risk, 1 to 2; intermediate risk, 3 to 6; high risk, 7 to 10).

RESULTS

Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas occurred in 13% of patients. The incidence was greatest with excessive blood loss. Duct size <5 mm was associated with increased fistula rates that rose with even smaller ducts. These factors, together with soft pancreatic parenchyma and certain disease pathologies, afforded a highly predictive 10-point Fistula Risk Score. Risk scores strongly correlated with fistula development (p < 0.001). Notably, patients with scores of 0 points never developed a CR-POPF, while fistulas occurred in all patients with scores of 9 or 10. Other clinical and economic outcomes segregated by risk profile across the 4 risk strata.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple 10-point Fistula Risk Score derived during pancreaticoduodenectomy accurately predicts subsequent CR-POPF. It can be readily learned and broadly deployed. This prediction tool can help surgeons anticipate, identify, and manage this ominous complication from the outset.

Risk assessment using a novel score to predict anastomotic leak and major complications after oesophageal resection

BACKGROUND

Oesophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A simple score to define a patient's risk of developing major complications would be beneficial.

METHODS

Patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal resections with an oesophageal anastomosis between 2005 and 2010 were reviewed and formed the development dataset with resections performed in 2011 forming a prospective validation dataset. The association between post-operative C-reactive protein (CRP), white cell count (WCC) and albumin levels with anastomotic leak (AL) or major complication including death using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification were analysed by receiver operating characteristic curves. After multivariate analysis, from the development dataset, these factors were combined to create a novel score which was subsequently tested on the validation dataset.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-eight patients were assessed to develop the score. Sixty-three patients (25%) developed a major complication, and there were seven (2.7%) in-patient deaths. Twenty-six (10%) patients were diagnosed with AL at median post-operative day 7 (range: 5-15). CRP (p = 0.002), WCC (p < 0.0001) and albumin (p = 0.001) were predictors of AL. Combining these markers improved prediction of AL (NUn score > 10: sensitivity 95%, specificity 49%, diagnostic accuracy 0.801 (95% confidence interval: 0.692-0.909, p < 0.0001)). The validation dataset confirmed these findings (NUn score > 10: sensitivity 100%, specificity 57%, diagnostic accuracy 0.879 (95% CI 0.763-0.994, p = 0.014)) and a major complication or death (NUn > 10: sensitivity 89%, specificity 63%, diagnostic accuracy 0.856 (95% CI 0.709-1, p = 0.001)).

CONCLUSIONS

Blood-borne markers of the systemic inflammatory response are predictors of AL and major complications after oesophageal resection. When combined they may categorise a patient's risk of developing a serious complication with higher sensitivity and specificity.

Influence of major postoperative complications on health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of esophageal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of major postoperative complications on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in 5-year survivors of esophageal cancer surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was based on the Swedish Esophageal and Cardia Cancer register with almost complete nationwide coverage and data on esophageal cancer surgery collected prospectively between 2001 and 2005. Patients who were alive 5 years after surgery were eligible. HRQL was assessed longitudinally until 5 years after surgery by using the validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and OES18. Linear mixed models were used to assess the mean score difference (MD) with 95% CIs of each aspect of HRQL in patients with or without major postoperative complications. Adjustment was made for several potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of 153 patients who survived 5 years, 141 patients (92%) answered the 5-year HRQL questionnaires. Of these individuals, 46 patients (33%) sustained a major postoperative complication. Dyspnea (MD, 15; 95% CI, 6 to 23), fatigue (MD, 13; 95% CI, 5 to 20), and eating restrictions (MD, 10; 95% CI, 2 to 17) were clinically and statistically significantly deteriorated throughout the follow-up in patients with major postoperative complications compared with patients without major complications. Although problems with choking declined to levels comparable with patients without major postoperative complications, sleep difficulties and gastroesophageal reflux progressively worsened during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of postoperative complications exerts a long-lasting negative effect on HRQL in patients who survive 5 years after esophagectomy for cancer.

Unplanned reoperation and reintervention after pancreatic resections: an analysis of risk factors

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to determine the incidence of any unplanned reoperation or reintervention procedure after pancreatic resection and to identify the underlying risk factors.

METHODS

A total of 189 consecutive pancreatic resections performed from 2001-2008 were searched for any unplanned reoperation, percutaneous drainage, or angiographic reintervention. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, including patient characteristics, comorbidities, details of surgery, specific complications, incidence of reoperation/reintervention, and mortality was performed.

RESULTS

Overall rates of reoperation, reintervention, and mortality were 6.3% (12/189), 7.9% (15/189), and 1.6% (3/189), respectively. Four patients underwent reintervention and reoperation, so the combined reoperation/reintervention rate was 12.2% (23/189). Reoperation (P < 0.001) and reintervention (P = 0.002) correlated with mortality. Hemorrhage (relative risk [RR], 58; P = 0.0017) and the combination of hemorrhage and pancreatic fistula (RR, 117; P < 0.0001) were identified as risk factors for unplanned reoperation, hemorrhage (RR, 82; P = 0.005), pancreatic fistula (RR, 42; P < 0.001), and the combination of both complications (RR, 246; P < 0.001) for reoperation and/or reintervention. Other patient- or procedure-related factors did not influence the reoperation and/or reintervention rates significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic fistula and hemorrhage are the predominant factors that afford unplanned reoperation/reintervention. Although reporting the incidence of unplanned reoperation will include the most severe postoperative complications, a considerable number of reinterventions are missed. Therefore, in outcome analyses of pancreatic surgery, not only reoperations but also any interventional therapies should be included.

Delayed gastric emptying improved by straight stomach reconstruction with twisted anastomosis to the jejunum after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) in 118 consecutive patients at a single institution

PURPOSE

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a leading cause of complication after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). Its incidence has been reported to range from 5 to 57%. We describe a modified reconstruction method, which resulted in a low rate of DGE.

METHODS

Between April 2003 and March 2008, we performed PPPD and reconstruction using an antecolic method in 118 consecutive patients. After PPPD, reconstruction was done using conventional Child procedure in 12 patients (PPPD group) and with the following modifications in the remaining 106 patients (PPPDR group): duodenojejunostomy was performed using the straight method and the jejunum was anastomosed with a 30° counterclockwise twist. We evaluated the incidence of DGE based on the grading system defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

RESULTS

The PPPDR group had a lower incidence of DGE than the PPPD group (PPPD), occurring in 7 patients (7%) versus 4 patients (33%), respectively. However, the overall morbidity rates and postoperative hospital stays of the two groups did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Straight stomach reconstruction with a twisted anastomosis could reduce the incidence of DGE after PPPD reconstruction.

Prediction of anastomotic leak and its prognosis in digestive surgery

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a dangerous postoperative complication in gastrointestinal surgery. The present study focuses on whether our prediction scoring system, "Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress" (E-PASS), could predict occurrence of AL and its prognosis in various kinds of gastrointestinal surgical procedures.

METHODS

We prospectively investigated parameters of E-PASS, absence or presence of AL, and in-hospital mortality in 6,005 patients who underwent elective digestive surgery with alimentary tract reconstruction in 45 acute care hospitals in Japan between 1 April 2002 and 31 March 2007.

RESULTS

Incidences of AL were 19.6% for esophagectomy via right thoracotomy and laparotomy, 11.7% for pancreaticoduodenectomy, 7.4% for low anterior resection, 4.0% for total gastrectomy, 1.8% for open distal gastrectomy, 1.3% for open colectomy, for an overall incidence of 4.1%. The incidence in each procedure significantly correlated with median value of surgical stress score of the E-PASS (R = 0.78, n = 11, p = 0.0048). The incidences of AL increased when Total Risk Points (TRP) of the E-PASS increased; 1.1% at the TRP range of <500, 2.8% at 500 to <1,000, 4.8% at 1,000 to <1,500, and 13.6% at ≥ 1,500 (p < 0.0001). In patients who suffered from AL, an in-hospital mortality rate at TRP < 1,000 was significantly lower than that at TRP of ≥ 1,000 (1.1 vs. 15.9%; p = 0.00019).

CONCLUSIONS

The E-PASS, requiring only nine variables, may be useful in predicting AL and its prognosis.

Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress score does not predict immediate outcome after pancreatic surgery

OBJECTIVE

The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress score was designed to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in general surgery. Our study aims to evaluate its use and accuracy in estimating postoperative outcome after elective pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2007, approximately 304 patients requiring pancreatic resection at our institution were recorded prospectively and evaluated retrospectively. The patients' preoperative risk score, surgical stress score (SSS), and comprehensive risk score (CRS) were calculated and compared with the severity of postoperative morbidity, where mortality was regarded as the most severe postoperative complication.

RESULTS

Observed and predicted mortality rates were 2.9% and 2.0%, respectively. Mean CRS was higher in patients who died than in patients that survived, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.20). Preoperative risk score, SSS, and CRS did not differ between patients with and without complications (preoperative risk score: P = 0.32; SSS: P = 0.22; CRS: P = 0.13). Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress particularly underpredicted morbidity in patients with a CRS between 0.0 and less than 0.5.

CONCLUSIONS

The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress scoring system is an ineffective predictor of complications after pancreatic resection. Further refinements to the score calculation are warranted to provide accurate prediction of immediate surgical outcome after pancreatic surgery.

Feasibility of Pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Nonuniversity Tertiary Care Center: What Are the Key Elements of Success?

It is advocated that a favorable outcome for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is related to a high volume at university centers. This article examines the specific elements that allow an equivalent outcome from PD in a nonuniversity tertiary care center (NUTCC). The study was performed to: 1) evaluate the outcome of PDs done at a NUTCC; 2) study the components of the process that are required to attain success in a NUTCC; and 3) provide a new look at the volume-outcome relationships in complex surgeries in a novel nonuniversity setting. Medical records of patients who underwent PD by a single surgeon between September 2005 and August 2008 at a high-volume NUTCC were analyzed. The records were reviewed with respect to preoperative and postoperative data, 30-day mortality, morbidity, and histopathology data. A total of 122 patients underwent PD. The mean age was 68.2 years. Jaundice was the most common presenting symptom in 57 per cent (69 patients). Thirty-nine patients (32%) underwent a pylorus-preserving PD. The mean operative time was 237 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss was 480 mL. The mean length hospital stay was 13 days. Thirty-day mortality was 3.2 per cent (four patients) and overall morbidity was 49 per cent. The key factors in developing a team dedicated to the care of the patient undergoing PD are discussed. A center of excellence can be developed in a NUTCC resulting in outcomes that meet and indeed may exceed nationally reported benchmarks. The key elements to success include a team approach to the patient undergoing PD.

Oesophagogastrectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy for caustic injury

Background

The justification for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for extended duodenal and pancreatic caustic necrosis is still a matter of debate.

Methods

This was a retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent PD in association with oesophagogastrectomy from a large single-centre cohort of patients with caustic injuries. Morbidity, mortality and long-term outcome were assessed.

Results

PD was performed in 18 (6·6 per cent) of 273 patients who underwent emergency surgery for caustic injuries. Biliary and pancreatic duct reconstruction during PD was performed in ten and six patients respectively. Seven patients died and 17 experienced operative complications after PD for caustic injuries. Twelve patients required at least one reoperation. Specific PD-related complications occurred in 13 patients. Initial (P = 0·038) or secondary (P &lt; 0·001) extension of necrosis to adjacent organs were independent predictors of operative death. After a median follow-up of 24 months following reconstruction, three patients had recovered nutritional autonomy. In an intention-to-treat analysis, functional success was recorded in three patients and the 5-year survival rate was 39 per cent after PD for caustic injury.

Conclusion

PD can save the lives of patients with caustic injuries extending beyond the pylorus, but has poor functional outcome. Immediate pancreatic duct reconstruction should be preferred to duct occlusion to decrease the rate of pancreatic complications.

Pancreatic anastomotic failure rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases with microsurgery

BACKGROUND

We have observed that leakage from pancreaticojejunostomy is reduced when a surgical microscope is used to construct the pancreaticojejunostomy during pancreaticoduodenectomy. To validate our hypothesis that better vision improves the technical performance of pancreaticojejunostomy, we limited inclusion criteria to those patients at high risk for leak, performed more cases, and used the grading system of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

From 1988 through 2008, 507 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed with pancreaticojejunostomy. A subset of 283 patients at risk for leak had a main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≤3 mm at the surgical margin. Pancreaticojejunostomy was completed with surgical loupes (n = 135) or surgical microscope (n = 148). Incidence of pancreaticojejunostomy leak and delayed gastric emptying was determined using a Web-based calculator for the severity grading scale of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.

RESULTS

Within the 507 pancreaticoduodenectomies, the clinically relevant pancreaticojejunostomy leak for those with an MPD >3 mm (n = 224) was 4%, and with an MPD ≤3 mm (n = 283) it was 16% (p < 0.0001). For these 283 high-risk patients, outcomes were worse in the loupes versus microscope group, ie, clinically relevant pancreaticojejunostomy leak (21% versus 11%; p = 0.021), pancreas-related complications (31% versus 19%; p = 0.018), clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying (19% versus 9%; p = 0.016), and hospital length of stay (12.9 versus 9.5 days; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a subset of pancreaticoduodenectomy patients at high risk for pancreaticojejunostomy leak, the increased visual acuity of the surgical microscope reduced clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic failure, delayed gastric emptying, and hospital length of stay.

Quality improvement for pancreatic cancer care: is regionalization a feasible and effective mechanism?

Variability exists in the quality of pancreatic cancer care provided in the United States. High-volume centers have been shown to have improved outcomes for pancreatectomy. Regionalization of pancreatic cancer care to high-volume centers has the potential to improve care and outcomes. Practical limitations such as overloading currently available high-volume centers, extending patient travel times, sharing patients within a multipayer health system, and incorporating patient preferences must be addressed for regionalization to become a reality. The benefits and limitations of regionalization of pancreatic cancer care are discussed in this review. To improve the overall quality of pancreatic cancer care at all hospitals in the United States, a combination of referral of patients with pancreatic cancer to high- and moderate-volume hospitals in conjunction with specific quality-improvement efforts at those institutions is proposed.

Enteral nutrition enriched with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) preserves lean body mass following esophageal cancer surgery: results of a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy represents an exemplar of controlled major trauma, with marked metabolic, immunologic, and physiologic changes as well as an associated high incidence of complications. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) enriched enteral nutrition (EN) modulates immune function and limits catabolism in patients with advanced cancer, but its impact in the peri-operative period is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of perioperative EPA enriched EN on the metabolic, nutritional, and immuno-inflammatory response to esophagectomy, and on postoperative complications.

METHODS

In a double-blind design, patients were randomized to a standard EN formula or a formula enriched with 2.2 g EPA/d for 5 days preoperatively (orally) and 21 days postoperatively (jejunostomy). Segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis was performed preoperatively and on POD 21. Postoperative complications were monitored, as well as the acute phase response, coagulation markers, and serum cytokines.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (28 EPA, 25 standard) completed the study, and both groups were well matched. Serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) membrane EPA levels were significantly increased in the EPA group. There was no difference in the incidence of major complications. The EPA group maintained all aspects of body composition postoperatively, whereas patients in the standard EN group lost significant amounts of fat-free mass (1.9 kg, P = 0.030) compared with the EPA group [leg (0.3 kg, P = 0.05), arm (0.17 kg, P = 0.01), and trunk (1.44 kg, P = 0.03)]. The EPA group had a significantly (P < 0.05) attenuated stress response for TNFalpha, IL-10, and IL-8 compared with the standard group.

CONCLUSIONS

EPA supplemented early EN is associated with preservation of lean body mass post esophagectomy compared with a standard EN. These properties may merit longer-term study to address its impact on recovery of function and quality of life in models of complex surgery or multimodal cancer treatment regimens.

Outcomes in pancreatic resection are negatively influenced by pre-operative hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Quality improvement in high-acuity surgery increasingly relies on clinical pathways to streamline patient care and to maximize cost-efficiency. Yet, it remains unclear whether immediate pre-operative hospitalization (non-elective resection) influences operative performance and to what extent it alters the post-operative course.

METHODS

Retrospective case series, cost analysis.University tertiary care referral centre. Four hundred and twelve consecutive pancreatic resections performed for benign and malignant disease between 2001 and 2008. Outcomes for both elective and non-elective operations were scrutinized, and correlated with deviations from our clinical Carepath for Pancreatic Resection. Observed-to-expected (O/E) morbidity ratios were calculated for each.

RESULTS

Overall, 39 patients (10%) required immediate pre-operative hospitalization, 22 (56%) of which were transferred from another hospital. The most common indications were pancreatitis, gastric outlet obstruction, intractable abdominal pain and gastrointestinal bleeding. During a 1- to 2-week hospitalization, 51% of patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), 36% were administered parenteral nutrition, 20% received antibiotics and 15% were transfused blood products. Yet, this pre-operative scenario, at a median cost of $7250 per patient, had no measurable impact on operative performance. Post-operatively, non-elective patients suffered more complications and a higher (O/E) ratio (1.00 vs. 0.93). These outcomes resulted in significantly more deviations from our carepath and an additional $7000 per non-elective case.

CONCLUSION

Immediate pre-operative hospitalization has no meaningful impact on operative performance; yet, deviations from a standardized clinical pathway are far more likely after non-elective pancreatic resection, and result in more severe clinical and economic outcomes.

Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy: a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of postoperative morbidity rate of a new pancreatogastrostomy technique, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with gastric partition (PPPD-GP) with the conventional technique of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ).

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

Pancreatojejunostomy and pancreatogastrostomy (PG) are the commonly preferred methods of anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). All randomized controlled trials failed to show advantage of a particular technique, suggesting that both PJ and PG provide equally results. However, postoperative morbidity remains high. The best technique in pancreatic anastomosis is still debated.

METHOD

Described here is a new technique, PPPD-GP; in this technique the gastroepiploic arcade is preserved. Gastric partition was performed using 2 endo-Gia staplers along the greater curvature of the stomach, 3 cm from the border. This gastric segment, 10 to 12 cm in length is placed in close proximity to the cut edge of the pancreatic stump. An end-to-side, duct-to-mucosa anastomosis (with pancreatic duct stent) is constructed. One hundred eight patients undergoing PPPD for benign and malignant diseases of the pancreatic head and the periampullary region were randomized to receive PG (PPPD-GP) or end-to-side PJ (PPPD-PJ).

RESULTS

The two treatment groups showed no differences in preoperative parameters and intraoperative factors. The overall postoperative complications were 23% after PPPD-GP and 44% after PPPD-PJ (P < 0.01). The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 4% after PPPD-GP and 18% after PPPD-PJ (P < 0.01). The mean + SD hospital stay was 12 +/- 2 days after PPPD-GP and 16 +/- 3 days after PPPD-PJ.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that PPPD-GP can be performed safely and is associated with less complication than PPPD-PJ. The advantage of this technique over other PG techniques is that the anastomosis is outside the area of the stomach where the contents empty into the jejunum, but pancreatic juice drains directly into the stomach.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of periampullary lesions, status post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure (RYGBP), poses a challenge. The strategy should focus on managing the gastric remnant.

METHODS

We propose a technique of managing the gastric remnant while doing a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in a patient with a previous RYGBP. From September 2005 to June 2008, two patients with a previous RYGBP underwent PD with a modified technique. The records were reviewed with respect to preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data.

RESULTS

Both patients were operated for a carcinoma of the head of pancreas. Neither patient underwent a preoperative endoscopic ultrasound. The operating times were 315 and 218 min. There was no mortality or morbidity seen. Neither patient was re-operated. The mean length of stay was 6 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique suggests an approach of managing the gastric remnant and preventing delayed gastric emptying which resulted in a decreased length of hospital stay.

Antecolic gastrointestinal reconstruction with pylorus dilatation. Does it improve delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study focuses upon prevention of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreaticoduodenectomy using a alternative reconstruction procedure.

METHOD

Forty consecutive patients underwent a typical pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with antecolic reconstruction in a two-year period (January 2002 until January 2004), while a similar group of 40 consecutive patients underwent PPPD with application of pyloric dilatation between January 2004 and January 2006. Early and late complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

DGE occurred significantly more often in the group of patients treated by the classical PPPD technique (nine patients -22%) compared with those operated on with the addition of pyloric dilatation technique (two patients -5%) (p<0.05). The incidence of other complications did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of dilatation may decrease the incidence of DGE after PPPD and facilitates earlier hospital discharge.

Directing Surgical Quality Improvement Initiatives: Comparison of Perioperative Mortality and Long-Term Survival for Cancer Surgery

Purpose

Quality-improvement initiatives are being developed to decrease volume-based variability in surgical outcomes. Resources for national and hospital quality-improvement initiatives are limited. It is unclear whether quality initiatives in surgical oncology should focus on factors affecting perioperative mortality or long-term survival. Our objective was to determine whether differences in hospital surgical volume have a larger effect on perioperative mortality or long-term survival using two methods.

Patients and Methods

From the National Cancer Data Base, 243,103 patients who underwent surgery for nonmetastatic colon, esophageal, gastric, liver, lung, pancreatic, or rectal cancer were identified. Multivariable modeling was used to evaluate 60-day mortality and 5-year conditional survival (excluding perioperative deaths) across hospital volume strata. The number of potentially avoidable perioperative and long-term deaths were calculated if outcomes at low-volume hospitals were improved to those of the highest-volume hospitals.

Results

Risk-adjusted perioperative mortality and long-term conditional survival worsened as hospital surgical volume decreased for all cancer sites, except for liver resections where there was no difference in survival. When comparing low- with high-volume hospitals, the hazard ratios for perioperative mortality were substantially larger than for long-term survival. However, the number of potentially avoidable deaths each year in the United States, if outcomes at low-volume hospitals were improved to the level of highest-volume centers, was significantly larger for long-term survival.

Conclusion

Although the magnitude of the hazard ratios implies that quality-improvement efforts should focus on perioperative mortality, a larger number of deaths could be avoided by focusing quality initiatives on factors associated with long-term survival.

Delayed gastric emptying: the state of the highest level of evidence

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) has been regarded as the most common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Opinions about DGE and its incidence widely vary between studies and between institutions. To crystallize current concepts of DGE we resorted to a systematic literature search of level I evidence. We found 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where DGE was measured but only 4 of these trials tested methods to influence DGE (erythromycin, enteral nutrition, or antecolic duodenojejunostomy). Constant heterogeneity for the definition of DGE was observed; 13 RCTs used 6 different clinical definitions based on some form of NG tube requirement after surgery, and the 3 remaining RCTs used non-clinical objective criteria. The most common element of the clinical definitions was the need for an NG tube >10 postoperative days. Ten RCTs used some form of this definition and the reported mean incidence of DGE was 17% however the range varied from 5% to 57%. The trials with the least number of cases appeared to have the widest variation in DGE incidence. We concluded after this systematic review that the disparate opinions about DGE could not be mediated with the highest level of evidence. The studies were underpowered or compromised by a lack of homogeneity in definition and design. The incidence of DGE cannot be succinctly measured; therefore the variables that influence DGE are not understood. We can begin to make progress by using the same definition such as the recently published definition provided by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.

Esophagectomy--it's not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal resection (ER) remains the standard therapy for early esophageal cancer; however, because of concerns regarding high levels of morbidity and mortality reported in analyses of national databases, many patients are relegated to less effective endoscopic or chemotherapeutic approaches.

METHODS

All patients undergoing esophagectomy by a single surgeon for cancer or high-grade dysplasia between 05/91-05/06 were prospectively entered into an IRB-approved database. All aspects of work-up and treatment were guided by an evolving standardized perioperative clinical pathway.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty consecutive patients, mean age of 64 (33-90), underwent ER for Barrett's esophagus (17) or invasive cancer stages I-87, II-133, III-94, IV-9. One hundred thirty-nine (41%) had neoadjuvant therapy. Sixty-three percent were American Society of Anesthesiologists class III or IV, and five different operative approaches were used. Patient were managed intraoperatively with a "fluid restriction" protocol. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 230 cc. 99.5% of patients were extubated immediately, and mean ICU and hospital stays were 2.25 (1-30) and 11.5 (6-49) days, respectively. Postoperative analgesia was managed with patient-controlled epidural analgesia in 98.5%, and 86% were mobilized on day 1 after surgery. Complications occurred in 153 patients (45%), most commonly atrial dysrhythmia (13%), and postoperative delirium (11%). Anastomotic leaks occurred in 13 patients (3.8%). Mortality occurred in one patient (0.3%). No significant differences were seen in length of stay, operative time, blood loss, or complications in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. For stages I, II, and III, patients between 1998-2004 Kaplan-Meier 5-year cumulative survival was 92.4, 57.1, and 34.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer can be done with moderate morbidity and very low mortality, and the expectation of improved levels of survival, especially in early-stage patients. Standardized perioperative clinical pathways can provide the infrastructure for the treatment of these patients and should include increased efforts to minimize blood loss and transfusions, improve postoperative pain control and extubation rates, and facilitate early mobilization and discharge. ER, as sole therapy or in combination with radiation/chemotherapy, should remain the standard of care in patients with early and locoregional esophageal cancer.

Deviation-based cost modeling: a novel model to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of clinical pathways

BACKGROUND

Although clinical pathways were developed to streamline patient care cost efficiently, few have been put to rigorous financial test. This is important today, because payors demand clear solutions to the cost-quality puzzle. We describe a novel, objective, and versatile model that can evaluate and link the clinical and economic impacts of clinical pathways.

STUDY DESIGN

Outcomes for 209 consecutive patients undergoing high-acuity surgery (pancreaticoduodenectomy), before and after pathway implementation, were examined. Four grades of deviation (none to major) from the expected postoperative course were defined by merging length of stay with a validated classification scheme for complications. Deviation-based cost modeling (DBCM) links these deviations to actual total costs.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes compared favorably with benchmark standards for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Despite increasing patient acuity, this new pathway shortened length of stay, reduced resource use, and decreased hospital costs. DBCM indicated that fewer deviations from the expected course occurred after pathway implementation. The impacts of complications were less severe and translated to an overall cost savings of $5,542 per patient. DBCM also revealed that as more patients migrated to the expected course within our standardized care path, 50% of overall cost savings ($2,780) was attributable to the pathway alone, and improvements in care over time (secular trends) accounted for the remainder.

CONCLUSIONS

DBCM accurately determined the incremental contribution of clinical pathway implementation to cost savings beyond that of secular trends alone. In addition, this versatile model can be customized to other systems' improvements to reveal their true clinical and economic impacts. This is valuable when choices linking quality with cost must be made.

Major pancreatic resections for suspected cancer in a community-based teaching hospital: lessons learned

BACKGROUND

The literature reports 4-10% mortality rate, 30-60% morbidity rate, and 9-29% anastomotic leak rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) performed for periampullary tumors. These data demonstrate a linear relationship between surgical volume and outcome.

METHODS

The objective of this study was to evaluate the experience of a high-volume hospital with low-volume pancreatoduodenectomy for suspected cancer. The study was designed as a retrospective review of medical records of all patients who underwent pancreatoduodenal resection or total pancreatectomy for a suspected periampullary carcinoma between January 1994 and December 2003. The setting of the study was a community-based teaching hospital with a general surgery residency training program.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients underwent pancreatoduodenal resection or total pancreatectomy. All procedures were performed by a total of 15 different surgeons; however, 27 operations were performed by one surgeon. Pre-operative diagnosis in most cases was either a known malignancy-27 cases (43%) or a tumor of the head of the pancreas, suspicious for malignancy-36 cases (57%). One patient underwent a total pancreatectomy. In 62 patients a pancreatoduodenal resection (Whipple procedure) was performed. Post-operative 30-day mortality was 4.7% (three patients). Overall in-hospital mortality was 9.5% (six patients). Ten (16.1%) had a leak of the pancreato-jejunal anastomosis, six of which resolved with non-operative management. Of the remaining four patients, three died from peritonitis or consequences of erosive hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative leak of the pancreatic anastomosis represents a technical challenge. Although most of the leaks can be treated non-operatively, those that lead to peritonitis or erosive hemorrhage warrant operative intervention. Major pancreatic resections can be performed safely with low rates of morbidity and operative mortality with careful selection of patients at a low-volume community-based teaching hospital.

Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine if an antecolic or a retrocolic duodenojejunostomy during pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PpPD) was associated with the least incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE), in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The pathogenesis of DGE after PpPD has been speculated to be related to factors such as inflammation, ischemia, gastric atony, motilin levels, and type of surgical procedure. Previous retrospective studies have shown a lower incidence of DGE after antecolic duodenojejunostomy. A prospective trial is needed.

METHODS

Forty patients were enrolled in this trial between May 2002 and April 2004. Just before duodenojejunostomy during PpPD, the patients were randomly assigned to undergo either an antecolic or a retrocolic duodenojejunostomy.

RESULTS

DGE occurred in 5% of patients with the antecolic route for duodenojejunostomy versus 50% with the retrocolic route (P = 0.0014). Those with the antecolic route had a significantly shorter duration of postoperative nasogastric tube drainage than did those with the retrocolic route (4.2 days versus 18.9 days, respectively, P = 0.047). By postoperative day 14, all patients with the antecolic route could take solid foods, while only 55% (11 of 20) of the patients with the retrocolic route could take solid foods (P = 0.0007). The length of stay in the hospital was 28 days for the antecolic group versus 48 days for the retrocolic group (P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Antecolic reconstruction for duodenojejunostomy during PpPD decreases postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay by decreasing DGE. Our data suggest that PpPD with antecolic duodenojejunostomy is a safer operation.

Pancreatic cancer: surgery alone is not sufficient

For a patient with resected pancreatic cancer at the head of the pancreas, the goal of the medical community in the new millennium is a long-term survival rate exceeding 50% at 5 years. This goal can best be achieved with the following formula: accurate staging by improved imaging that includes laparoscopy for selected patients with locally extensive disease using computed tomography; a balanced resection, not too extensive and not too limited; centralized treatment in high-volume centers, which includes not just the surgeons and hospitals, but also the chemotherapy infusion units; and use of an effective adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment in which toxicity is associated with efficacy. The ideal outcome for the surgeon is delivery of a patient who has been accurately staged to receive the most appropriate treatment in a timely fashion for an effective chemoradiotherapy protocol. To do this, the surgeon should use objective benchmarks of safe pancreatic resection, which involves resecting only enough, achieving low blood loss, and achieving a minimal length of hospital stay. The outcome is a patient who has optimized his or her gastrointestinal, endocrine, and exocrine functions and is ready for adjuvant treatment 6 weeks after resection. Surgery alone is not sufficient.