Robot-assisted pediatric surgery

Advancing Pediatric Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Trends, Outcomes, and Future Directions-A Comprehensive Review

INTRODUCTION

 Pediatric robotic colorectal surgery has rapidly evolved, offering enhanced precision and safety for treating complex conditions such as Hirschsprung disease (HSCR), anorectal malformations (ARMs), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This review analyzes recent trends, outcomes, and complications in robotic colorectal procedures for pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A systematic review was performed using PubMed, yielding 1,112 articles related to pediatric robotic colorectal surgery. After applying exclusion criteria, 35 papers were analyzed, focusing on patient characteristics, procedure types, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

 Since 2001, approximately 700 pediatric patients have undergone robotic colorectal procedures, with HSCR being the most commonly treated condition (n = 421). The review highlights that 1.7% of patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade III complications, while 11.5% had grade I to II complications, indicating a favorable safety profile. The use of robotic platforms facilitated improved precision during perirectal dissection and reduced the risk of damage to adjacent structures, particularly in cases requiring complex pelvic dissections. Despite promising outcomes, the uptake of robotic colorectal surgery remains lower than that for urologic procedures due to challenges such as cost, instrument size, and specialized training.

CONCLUSION

 Robotic colorectal surgery in children is a safe and effective approach, particularly for complex conditions like HSCR, IBDs, and ARMs. While adoption is currently limited by cost and training requirements, ongoing advancements in technology and techniques promise to broaden its application and improve outcomes in pediatric surgery.

Comparison of robotic vs. laparoscopic treatment in pediatric ovarian benign tumors

OBJECTIVE

To compare the differences in surgical outcomes of robot-assisted treatment and laparoscopy for benign ovarian tumors among pediatric patients.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients underwent robot-assisted surgery, and their outcomes were compared with 55 patients treated with laparoscopy during the same period by the same surgeons.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age (7.5 ± 4.5 vs. 8.8 ± 3.8 years, p = 0.2496), weight (29.3 ± 17.7 vs. 31.7 ± 14.6 kg, p = 0.4383), or tumor size (5.0 ± 3.3 vs. 5.1 ± 3.8 cm, p = 0.8541). However, the operative time was significantly longer in the robotic surgery group (102.7 ± 33.5 vs. 89.3 ± 50.9 min, p = 0.0112). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss. Fewer patients in the robotic surgery group opted for day surgery compared to the laparoscopy group (15.4% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups of patients who chose inpatient surgery (5.6 ± 3.4 vs. 4.4 ± 2.9 d, p = 0.1213). There was no conversion to open surgery and no early postoperative complications in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted surgery and laparoscopy yield comparable outcomes for the treatment of benign ovarian tumors in children, although robotic surgery has a longer operative time.

Robot-assisted abdominal surgery in children less than 5 months of age: retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly used in children. While robot-assisted surgery in children has been proved to be safe and feasible, use in infants is controversial. The purpose of this study was to present a study of robot-assisted abdominal surgery in children less than5 months of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 111 patients less than 5 months of age who underwent abdominal surgery from April 2020 to December 2022 in our hospital. The data included clinical information, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Among these 111 patients, 67 underwent robot-assisted surgery and 44 underwent laparoscopic-assisted surgery, the robot-assisted group includes 40 patients with Hirschsprung disease, 20 patients with choledochal cysts, and 7 patients with intestinal duplication, the laparoscopic-assisted group includes 26 patients with Hirschsprung disease, 9 patients with choledochal cysts, and 9 patients with intestinal duplication. For Hirschsprung disease, the operation time was significantly longer ( P =0.013) and the intraoperative bleeding was significantly less ( P =0.000) in the robot-assisted group than the laparoscopic assisted group. For choledochal cysts, the median operation time of 180 mins for the robot-assisted group was not significantly longer than the laparoscopic assisted surgery group at 160 mins ( P =0.153). For intestinal duplication, the operation time was significantly longer ( P =0.002) in the robot-assisted group than the laparoscopic assisted group. For these three diseases, the hospitalization expense was significantly higher ( P <0.05) in the robot-assisted group than the laparoscopic assisted group, there were no significant differences in complications, and postoperative fasting time between two groups ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted abdominal surgery in children less than 5 months of age is safe and feasible. This study showed that the surgical indications for the Da Vinci robot system in children can be extended to infants.

Pediatric Single-Incision Robotic Cholecystectomy: A 6-Year Update from a Single Institution

Introduction: In children, gallbladder disease has become more common due to the rise in childhood obesity and subsequent shift in etiology. While the gold standard of surgical management remains a laparoscopic technique, there has been increasing interest in robotic-assisted techniques. The aim of this study is to report a 6-year update on the experience of treating gallbladder disease with robotic-assisted surgery at a single institution. Materials and Methods: A database was created to prospectively collect patient demographic and operative variables at the time of operation from October 2015 to May 2021. Descriptive analysis of select available variables was performed using median and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for all continuous variables. Results: In total, 102 single-incision robotic cholecystectomies and one single-port subtotal cholecystectomy were performed. From available data, 82 (79.6%) patients were female, median weight was 66.25 kg (IQR: 58.09-74.24 kg), and median age was 15 years (IQR: 15-18 years). Median procedure time was 84 minutes (IQR: 70.25-103.5 minutes) and median console time was 41 minutes (IQR: 30-59.5 minutes). The most frequent preoperative diagnosis was symptomatic cholelithiasis (79.6%). One (0.97%) operation was converted from a single-incision robotic approach to open. Conclusion: Single-incision robotic cholecystectomy is a safe and reliable technique for the treatment of gallbladder disease in the adolescent population.

Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Approach for Splenectomy in Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: To compare the outcomes of pediatric splenectomies for hematologic diseases performed by robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and laparoscopic approach. Materials and Methods: Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases were systematically searched for publications in English language from January 2000 to March 2020. All the studies dealing with pediatric elective splenectomies performed by RALS were included. The primary outcomes were the rate of postoperative complications and conversion. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and the operative time. Results: The search yielded 969 articles. Ten articles were included in the systematic review. Eighty patients underwent RALS splenectomy. Thirteen postoperative complications (16%) were reported and RALS was converted to open surgery in five cases (6.3%). Five of the included articles, three retrospective studies and two case series, were considered relevant for the meta-analysis and dealt with 130 patients. Of them, 71 children (55%) underwent RALS. No difference in the rate of complications was found between the two approaches (P = .235). RALS presented a similar rate of conversion to open surgery (P = .301). The mean operative times and length of hospital stays for RALS, reported in three different studies, were 107.5, 159.6, 140.5 minutes and 4.2, 3.93, 2.1 days, respectively. Conclusion: Even if few studies were included in the review, this meta-analysis reported similar rates of complication and conversion for RALS when compared with laparoscopy. Further studies are required to prove that this innovative technique was as safe and feasible as the current gold standard technique.

Ten years of paediatric robotic surgery: Lessons learned

Background

Costs and a low total number of cases may be obstacles to the successful implementation of a paediatric robotic surgery programme. The aim of this study was to evaluate a decade of paediatric robotic surgery and to reflect upon factors for success and to consider obstacles.

Materials and Methods

All children operated on with robotic‐assisted laparoscopic surgery between 2006 and 2016 were included in a retrospective, single‐institutional study in Lund, Sweden.

Results

A total of 152 children underwent robotic surgery during the study time with the most frequent procedures being fundoplication (n = 55) and pyeloplasty (n = 53). Procedure times decreased significantly during the study period. Overall, 18 (12%) of the operations were converted to open surgery, and seven (5%) patients required a reoperation.

Conclusions

Despite a low volume of surgery, we have successfully introduced robotic paediatric surgery in our department. Our operative times and conversion rates are continuously decreasing.

Robotically Assisted Surgery in Children—A Perspective

The introduction of robotically assisted surgery was a milestone for minimally invasive surgery in the 21st century. Currently, there are two CE-approved robotically assisted surgery systems for use and development in pediatrics. Specifically, tremor filtration and optimal visualization are approaches which can have enormous benefits for procedures in small bodies. Robotically assisted surgery in children might have advantages compared to laparoscopic or open approaches. This review focuses on the research literature regarding robotically assisted surgery that has been published within the past decade. A literature search was conducted to identify studies comparing robotically assisted surgery with laparoscopic and open approaches. While reported applications in urology were the most cited, three other fields (gynecology, general surgery, and “others”) were also identified. In total, 36 of the publications reviewed suggested that robotically assisted surgery was a good alternative for pediatric procedures. After several years of experience of this surgery, a strong learning curve was evident in the literature. However, some authors have highlighted limitations, such as high cost and a limited spectrum of small-sized instruments. The recent introduction of reusable 3 mm instruments to the market might help to overcome these limitations. In the future, it can be anticipated that there will be a broader range of applications for robotically assisted surgery in selected pediatric surgeries, especially as surgical skills continue to improve and further system innovations emerge.

Initial Experience with Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Adolescent Population

Purpose: There is no one standard procedure encompassing the needs and differences of the entire pediatric population for inguinal hernia repair (IHR). Several techniques can be used, including open repair, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair. This is a report of a single pediatric hospital's experience performing robotic-assisted IHRs in an adolescent population. Methods: Robotic IHRs performed by the pediatric surgery department were prospectively captured and reviewed. The operation performed was a modified robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach with ProGrip mesh. Results: Between January 2016 and August 2020, 11 robotic-assisted IHRs occurred. All patients were male, median weight interquartile range (IQR) was 76.6 kg (67.425-90.4 kg) and median age (IQR) was 17 years (17-18.5). All together median (IQR) total operative time was 111 (97.5-126) minutes, median (IQR) total console time was 60 (55.5-75.5) minutes. There were no complications or conversions, with all patients discharged on the day of the operation. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a safe and reliable approach to repairing inguinal hernias using robotics through a small initial case series. Robotic-assisted IHR should be considered a viable technique to optimize the surgical care of adolescents.

Evaluation of Surgical Devices Using an Artificial Pediatric Thoracic Model: A Comparison Between Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Suturing Versus Conventional Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Suturing

BACKGROUND

Pediatric robot-assisted surgery is increasingly being performed, but it is difficult to perform this procedure in infants. A pediatric thoracoscopic model of a 1-year-old patient was developed in our previous study, and this model was used to evaluate the use of a surgical robot for infant surgery.

METHODS

Eight pediatric surgeons performed an intracorporeal suturing and knot-tying task using the da Vinci Xi Robotic Surgical System. The task completion time, number of needle manipulations, and force applied during suturing of the robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) group were compared with those of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) group whose data had been collected from the same 8 surgeons in our previous study.

RESULTS

The RATS group showed a significantly shorter completion time than the VATS group in the knot-tying phase (P = .016) and in the total phase (P = .0078). The RATS group showed a significantly smaller number of manipulations than the VATS group in the total phase (P = .039). The RATS group showed a significantly smaller pushing force index than the VATS group in the suturing phase (P = .031), knot-tying phase (P = .031), and in the total phase (P = .031). A seventh rib in the model was dislocated in all RATS group cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The da Vinci Surgical System might be useful in infants because of fast movement and small pushing force. However, the robotic 8 mm instruments were too large for use in the thoracic cavity of the 1-year-old infant.

Partial nephrectomy for small children: Robot-assisted versus open surgery

OBJECTIVES

To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted heminephrectomy for duplex kidney in children with those of open heminephrectomy.

METHODS

The present retrospective multicentric analysis reviewed the records of robot-assisted versus open heminephrectomy carried out for duplex kidney in children from 2007 to 2014. Demographic data, weight, surgical time, hospital stay, complications and outcome were recorded. Follow up was based on a clinical review, renal sonography and dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scintigraphy.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients underwent robot-assisted heminephrectomy, and 13 patients underwent retroperitoneal heminephrectomy by open approach. All patients weighed <15 kg. The mean age at the time of surgery was 20.2 months (range 7-39 months) in the robotic group, and 18.4 months (range 6-41 months) in the open group. The mean hospital stay was statistically longer for the open surgery group (6.3 days, range 5-8 days vs 3.4 days, range 1-7 days; P < 0.001). Regarding postoperative pain control, total morphine equivalent intake was statistically greater for the open group (0.52 mg/kg/day vs 1.08 mg/kg/day; P < 0.001). No patient lost the remaining healthy moiety. There was no significant difference in terms of operating time, complication rate or renal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted heminephrectomy in small children seems to offer comparable renal outcomes with those of its standard open surgery counterpart. Specific technical adjustments are necessary, which typically increase the set-up time.

Robotic Single- and Multisite Cholecystectomy in Children

BACKGROUND

Elective cholecystectomy is a high-volume, simple procedure, well suited for the development of a pediatric robotic surgery program. Surgical robot software, by "reversing" the surgeon's hands, simplifies single-site cholecystectomy through a single incision at the umbilicus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were reviewed on the first nine children who had robotic cholecystectomy, with the Da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) device, at our institution. All cases were performed by a single surgeon, proctored by an experienced robotic general surgeon.

RESULTS

There were 9 patients: the first 4 patients had robotic multiport cholecystectomy, and the last 5 had robotic single-site cholecystectomy. Eight were girls. They were 10-18 years of age (median, 14 years). Diagnoses were biliary dyskinesia (n = 5) and symptomatic cholelithiasis (n = 4). Median body mass index was 24.9 (range, 20.2-43.8) kg/m(2). Median anesthesia time for multiport cholecystectomy was 139 (range, 120-162) minutes; median anesthesia time for single-site cholecystectomy was 169 (range 122-180) minutes. Median console time for multiport cholecystectomy was 47 (range, 44-58) minutes; median console time for single-site cholecystectomy was 69 (range, 66-86) minutes. Eight of the 9 patients went home on the day of surgery, and 1 stayed overnight. Patients were seen at 13-20 days after surgery (median, 14 days). There were no complications. There were no conversions to open surgery and none from single-site to multiport surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic cholecystectomy is safe and efficacious and is a suitable introductory procedure for pediatric surgeons considering a robotic surgery program. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy is a cosmetically attractive option but takes longer than multiport robotic cholecystectomy.

Robotic-Assisted Procedures in Pediatric Surgery: A Critical Appraisal of the Current Best Evidence in Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Surgery

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the use of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has expanded within pediatric surgery. Although increasing numbers of pediatric RAS case-series have been published, the level of evidence remains unclear, with authors mainly focusing on the comparison with open surgery rather than the corresponding laparoscopic approach. The aim of this study was to critically appraise the published literature comparing pediatric RAS with conventional minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in order to evaluate the current best level of evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature-based search for studies comparing pediatric RAS with corresponding MIS procedures was performed using multiple electronic databases and sources. The level of evidence was determined using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (OCEBM) criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies met defined inclusion criteria, reporting on five different procedures: fundoplication (n=8), pyeloplasty (n=8), nephrectomy (n=2), gastric banding (n=1), and sleeve gastrectomy (n=1). Included publications comprised 5 systematic reviews and 15 cohort/case-control studies (OCEBM Level 3 and 4, respectively). No studies of OCEBM Level 1 or 2 were identified. Limited evidence indicated reduced operative time (pyeloplasty) and shorter hospital stay (fundoplication) for pediatric RAS, whereas disadvantages were longer operative time (fundoplication, nephrectomy, gastric banding, and sleeve gastrectomy) and higher total costs (fundoplication and sleeve gastrectomy). There were no differences reported for complications, success rates, or short-term outcomes between pediatric RAS and conventional MIS in these procedures. Inconsistency was found in study design and follow-up with large clinical heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

The best available evidence for pediatric RAS is currently OCEBM Level 3, relating only to fundoplication and pyeloplasty. Therefore, higher-quality studies and comparative data for other RAS procedures in pediatric surgery are required.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) has been gaining acceptance among pediatric urologists. Over 300 have been described in the literature, but few studies have evaluated the role of RALP in infants alone.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the operative experience and outcomes of RALP in a cohort of infants treated at multiple institutions across the United States. Our primary aim was to describe the safety and efficacy of RALP within this cohort. We recognize the challenges of performing minimally invasive surgery in small patients. In our paper, we address some technical considerations for the infant population.

STUDY DESIGN

This multi-centered observational study collected data on subjects one year of age or less who underwent RALP between April 2006 and July 2012 at five institutions. The primary outcome was resolution of hydronephrosis, and secondary outcomes included surgical time and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients (62 procedures) underwent RALP by six surgeons during the study period. All surgeons had > 5 years of experience beyond fellowship training. Mean surgical age was 7.3 months (SD ± 1.7 mo), 56 patients (95%) were diagnosed prenatally, and 59 patients (95%) had follow up imaging. Of these patients, 91% showed resolution or improvement of hydronephrosis. Two patients had recurrent obstruction and required additional surgery. Mean surgical time was 3 hours 52 minutes (SD ± 43 minutes). Seven (11%) patients reported intra-operative or immediate post-operative complications.

DISCUSSION

This series found a 91% success rate for reduction or resolution of hydronephrosis, and an 11% complication rate. This is equivalent to modern series comparing open pyeloplasty to pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, which report success rates ranging from 70-96%, and complication rates ranging from 0-24% for open pyeloplasty. We lacked a standardized technique amongst institutions. This was not surprising since there are not established technical benchmarks for this surgery. However, we specified multiple technical considerations for this unique patient population.

CONCLUSION

The advantages of using robot-assistance to perform pyeloplasty in infants remain to be defined. This study cannot make that assessment due to small sample size. Nonetheless, this cohort is the largest robotic pyeloplasty series in infants to date. Seeing an excellent success rate and a low complication rate in this infant cohort is encouraging.

Gastric cancer: current status of diagnosis and treatment

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of death from malignant disease worldwide and most frequently discovered in advanced stages. Because curative surgery is regarded as the only option for cure, early detection of resectable gastric cancer is extremely important for good patient outcomes. Therefore, noninvasive diagnostic modalities such as evolutionary endoscopy and positron emission tomography are utilized as screening tools for gastric cancer. To date, early gastric cancer is being treated using minimally invasive methods such as endoscopic treatment and laparoscopic surgery, while in advanced cancer it is necessary to consider multimodality treatment including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. Because of the results of large clinical trials, surgery with extended lymphadenectomy could not be recommended as a standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Recent clinical trials had shown survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection compared with surgery alone. In addition, recent advances of molecular targeted agents would play an important role as one of the modalities for advanced gastric cancer. In this review, we summarize the current status of diagnostic technology and treatment for gastric cancer.

Laparoscopic versus robotic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Potential advantages and limits of an expensive approach

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to compare the laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy with the robotic approach in patients with hereditary spherocytosis.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive subtotal splenectomies by minimal approach in patients with hereditary spherocytosis were analyzed (10 robotic vs. 22 laparoscopic subtotal splenectomies).

RESULTS

A significant difference was found for the robotic approach regarding blood loss, vascular dissection duration, and splenic remnant size. Follow-up for 4-103 months was available.

CONCLUSIONS

Subtotal splenectomy seems to be a suitable candidate for robotic surgery, requiring a delicate dissection of the splenic vessels and a correct intraoperative evaluation of the splenic remnant. Robotic subtotal splenectomy is comparable to laparoscopy in terms of hospital stay and complication. The main benefits are lower blood loss rate, vascular dissection time, and a better evaluation of the splenic remnant volume.

Robotic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Many reports have addressed the feasibility and safety of using robotic surgery in children. To our knowledge, no published report has described the use of a surgical robot in the repair of anorectal malformations (ARMs).

METHODS

Included children underwent robotic-assisted repair of ARMs with rectourethral fistula between April 2006 and March 2010 at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using the da Vinci Surgical System. Their medical records were reviewed with respect to demographic data, associated anomalies, techniques and operative procedures, complications, outcomes, and follow-up.

RESULTS

Five male infants (mean age, 6.6 months) underwent robotic-assisted repair of ARMs with rectourethral fistula using the Georgeson technique. The fistulae were divided and ligated in 4 patients and was left open in 1. All procedures were successfully completed without conversion to an open technique. One patient developed left-sided epididymo-orchitis postoperatively. All the patients had their colostomy closed. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months. Fecal continence was difficult to assess in 2 patients. Two patients have voluntary bowel movements without soiling. One infant has fecal soiling and is on a laxative/enema for constipation.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotically assisted repair of ARMs with rectourethral fistula is feasible and safe. It offers a good alternative to the criterion standard, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP), for repair of ARMs with rectourethral fistula. More patients and a longer follow-up period are needed for further evaluation of this novel approach.

Minimally invasive surgery in neonates and infants

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has significantly improved the field of surgery, with benefits including shorter operating time, improved recovery time, minimizing stress and pain due to smaller incisions, and even improving mortality. MIS procedures, including their indications, impact, limitations, and possible future evolution in neonates and infants, are discussed in this article.

[A role of robotic-assisted surgery to preserve female fertility? Comments about the first paratubal cystectomy performed with the "Da Vinci S" robotic system in a young girl]

In the field of adnexal surgeries in children, robotic surgery seems to make easier the realization of minimal invasive surgery. It could lead to a decrease of post-surgical adherences and therefore preserve the fertility of young patients. We report the first paratubal cystectomy performed using robotic assistance on a child in order to preserve her future fertility and discuss advantages and disadvantages of this technology.

Robot-assisted anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using retroperitoneal approach

BACKGROUND

Over the past few years, robot-assisted surgery has become increasingly popular, affecting virtually all surgical fields. It has been proven to overcome pitfalls of laparoscopic procedures, such as high complication rates and steep learning curve. We have, therefore, performed experimental anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) using retroperitoneal approach in swine model to test the feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in spinal surgery.

METHOD

In this report, we describe the setup with the da Vinci surgical system, operative method, result and discuss technical aspects and the future of robot-assisted ALIF.

FINDINGS

Experimental retroperitoneal dissection using robotic surgical system was successfully performed with great visual cue, minimal retraction and minimal bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Although retroperitoneal approach for spinal fusion has never been attempted with robotic surgical system, we could demonstrate the possibility with swine model. Further studies and development of appropriate instruments will bring minimally invasive spine surgery to a new era.

A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices

BACKGROUND

Surgical robotics has been promoted as an enabling technology. This study tests the hypothesis that use of the robotic surgical system can significantly improve technical ability by comparing the performance of both experts and novices on a complex laparoscopic task and a robotically assisted task.

METHODS

Laparoscopic experts (LE) with substantial laparoscopic and robotic experience (n = 9) and laparoscopic novices (LN) (n = 20) without any robotic experience performed sequentially 10 trials of a suturing task using either robotic or standard laparoscopic instrumentation fitted to the ProMIS surgical simulator. Objective performance metrics provided by ProMIS (total task time, instrument pathlength, and smoothness) and an assessment of learning curves were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with LNs, the LEs demonstrated significantly better performance on all assessment measures. Within the LE group, there was no difference in smoothness (328 +/- 159 vs 355 +/- 174; P = .09) between robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic tasks. An improvement was noted in total task time (113 +/- 41 vs 132 +/- 55 sec; P < .05) and instrument pathlengths (371 +/- 163 vs 645 +/- 269 cm; P < .05) when using the robot. This advantage in terms of total task time, however, was lost among the LEs by the last 3 trials (114 +/- 40 vs 118 +/- 49 s; P = .84), while instrument pathlength remained better consistently throughout all the trials. For the LNs, performance was significantly better in the robotic trials on all 3 measures throughout all the trials.

CONCLUSION

The ProMIS surgical simulator was able to distinguish between skill levels (expert versus novice) on robotic suturing tasks, suggesting that the ProMIS is a valid tool for measuring skill in robot-assisted surgery. For all the ProMIS metrics, novices demonstrated consistently better performance on a suturing task using robotics as compared to a standard laparoscopic setup. This effect was less evident for experts who demonstrated improvements only in their economy of movement (pathlength), but not in the speed or smoothness of performance. Robotics eliminated the early learning curve for novices, which was present when they used standard laparoscopic tools. Overall, this study suggests that, when performing complex tasks such as knot tying, surgical robotics is most useful for inexperienced laparoscopists who experience an early and persistent enabling effect. For experts, robotics is most useful for improving economy of motion, which may have implications for the highly complex procedures in limited workspaces (eg, prostatectomy).

Minimal Access Portoenterostomy: Advantages and Disadvantages of Standard Laparoscopic and Robotic Techniques

PURPOSE

Minimal access portoenterostomy (Kasai procedure) for biliary atresia represents a technically challenging operation. The standard laparoscopic approach yields results comparable to the open technique. After an initial experience with standard laparoscopy, we assessed the potentially superior optics and dexterity of a surgical robotic system for performing portoenterostomy. We reviewed our experience with minimal access portoenterostomy to compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of standard laparoscopic and robotic approaches to biliary atresia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic portoenterostomy at our institution between October 2002 and October 2005. Outcome measures included the need to convert to laparotomy, complications, functional outcome expressed either as the direct bilirubin at most recent follow-up (> or = 3 months) or age at transplant, and density of adhesions at transplant. Surgeons' impressions of the two minimal access modalities were also reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients underwent minimal access portoenterostomy (7 standard laparoscopy; 3 robotic-assisted). Mean follow-up was 20 months (range, 1-36 months). There were no conversions to laparotomy and no intraoperative complications. There was one port site infection that resolved with antibiotics. Five patients (4 laparoscopic, 1 robotic) had progressed to transplantation at the time of follow-up. At transplant, one patient had mild adhesions and two had dense adhesions. Adhesions were not noted for 2 patients.

CONCLUSION

We believe both surgical modalities are feasible from a technical point of view. However, the optical and dexterity advantages of the robotic system were offset by the large instrument size and lack of force feedback.

Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction is an evolving technique. We review the current literature related to this technique and discuss the current technique and outcomes of robotic pyeloplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent advances in robotic-assisted surgery have allowed the successful completion of complex reconstructive procedures in the pediatric population, including the robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty can be performed by either a transperitoneal or a retroperitoneal approach. Overall, the procedure is safe, efficacious, and may have particular benefits over open surgery.

SUMMARY

The evolution of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology has been limited by the challenge of laparoscopic suturing. Robotic systems may offer the means to overcome this major impediment of laparoscopic surgery. The results of this review demonstrate that robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is safe, technically feasible, and efficacious in the pediatric population, and may be comparable to a contemporary series of open pyeloplasty. As the technology continues to evolve, the efficiency of the robotic system is likely to improve; however, the ultimate role of robotic-assisted or computer-assisted surgical systems remains unclear. To further determine the role of robotic systems in the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, rigorous prospective research is needed that combines surgical and technical outcomes with overall subjective or cosmetic outcome and economic analysis.

Surgical robotics and image guided therapy in pediatric surgery: emerging and converging minimal access technologies

Minimal access surgery (MAS) is now commonplace in the armamentarium of the pediatric surgeon, and is being applied to a growing list of pediatric surgical diseases. Robot-assisted surgery and image guided therapy (IGT) have evolved as innovative minimal access approaches, and hold the promise of advancing MAS far beyond what is currently possible. The aims of this article are to describe the currently available robotic, and image guided therapy systems, review their present and potential applications, and discuss the future directions of these converging technologies.

Pediatric Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Comparison With a Cohort of Open Surgery

PURPOSE

We assessed the usefulness of RALP in children and compared an age matched cohort undergoing OPN to RALP for safety, efficacy, operative time, blood loss, in-hospital narcotic use and LOS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study from 2000 to 2004 of 33 patients undergoing RALP and 33 undergoing OPN. Average age of each group was not significantly different (RALP 7.8 years vs OPN 7.6 years, p = 0.75). Mean followup of RALP and OPN groups was 10 and 21 months, respectively.

RESULTS

Etiology of the obstruction was not significantly different. Mean operative time was significantly less for OPN (181 minutes vs 219 minutes for RALP, p = 0.031). As RALP experience increased, operative times improved and approached the OPN experience. RALP complications included 1 patient requiring reoperative surgery vs no complications in the OPN group (p = 0.15). Patients undergoing RALP had a mean LOS of 2.3 days compared to 3.5 days for OPN (p <0.001). Total narcotic requirements were significantly less in the RALP group (p = 0.001). All patients in the OPN and 31 in the RALP group had either resolution of hydronephrosis, improvement in drainage or relief of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

We documented the safety and efficacy of RALP in children. RALP showed advantages of decreased hospital stay, decreased narcotic use and operative times approaching those of open surgery. RALP is an option for pyeloplasty, and as robotic technology improves, this method of repair may become the minimally invasive treatment of choice.

Minimally invasive pediatric nephrectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since the first laparoscopic pediatric nephrectomy was performed in 1992, many articles have reported the feasibility of minimally invasive nephrectomy, heminephrectomy, and nephroureterectomy in children. This article reviews the literature related to minimally invasive nephrectomy, including robot-assisted surgery, and its complications published between November 2002 and November 2004.

RECENT FINDINGS

The retroperitoneoscopic approach to nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy continues to prove successful in the pediatric population, although the transperitoneal approach is beneficial in combined upper and lower tract procedures. Initial reports on bilateral transperitoneal nephrectomy for nephrotic syndrome and laparoscopic nephrectomy for Wilms tumor are presented. Comparison studies between laparoscopic nephrectomy and open procedures are reviewed. Robot-assisted procedures are possible in children but little information is available on their pediatric use at the present time. Laparoscopy in children appears to have a similar complication rate to that in adults.

SUMMARY

More studies are needed to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive procedures with those of open procedures. Robot-assisted surgery offers promise but expense currently limits its use.