Failed fundoplications

Long-term results after laparoscopic revision fundoplication: a retrospective, single-center analysis in 194 patients with recurrent hiatal hernia

BACKGROUND

After laparoscopic fundoplication, 10-20% of patients experience symptom recurrence-often due to resurgence of the hiatal hernia. The standard surgical treatment for such cases remains laparoscopic revision fundoplication. However, there is little data on the time frame and anatomic patterns of failed fundoplications. Additionally, few large studies exist on the long-term efficacy and safety of laparoscopic revision fundoplication.

METHODS

In a single-center, retrospective analysis of 194 consecutive revision fundoplications for recurrent reflux disease due to hiatal hernia, we collected data on time to failure and patterns of failure of the primary operation, as well as on the efficacy and safety of the revision.

RESULTS

The median time to failure of the primary fundoplication was 3 years. Most hiatal defects were smaller than 5 cm and located anteriorly or concentric around the esophagus. Laparoscopic redo fundoplication was technically successful in all cases. The short-term complication rate was 9%, mainly dysphagia requiring endoscopic intervention. At a mean follow-up of 4.7 years, 77% of patients were symptom-free, 14% required daily PPI, and 9% underwent secondary revision. Cumulative failure rates were 9%, 23%, and 31% at 1, 5, and 10 years.

CONCLUSION

The majority of failed fundoplications occur within 3 years of primary surgery, with most patients exhibiting anterior or concentric defects. For these patients, laparoscopic revision fundoplication is a safe procedure with a low rate of short-term complications and satisfactory long-term results.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Redo Fundoplication in Patients With Failed Antireflux Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the current available evidence regarding the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic redo fundoplication (LRF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although antireflux surgery is highly effective, a minority of patients will require a LRF due to recurrent symptoms, mechanical failure, or intolerable side-effects of the primary repair.

METHODS

A systematic electronic search on LRF was conducted in the Medline database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Conversion and postoperative morbidity were used as primary endpoints to determine feasibility and safety. Symptom improvement, QoL improvement, and recurrence rates were used as secondary endpoints to assess efficacy. Heterogeneity across studies was tested with the Chi-square and the proportion of total variation attributable to heterogeneity was estimated by the inconsistency (I2) statistic. A random-effect model was used to generate a pooled proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI) across all studies.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies and 2,095 LRF were included. The mean age at reoperation was 53.3 years. The weighted pooled proportion of conversion was 6.02% (95% CI, 4.16%-8.91%) and the meta-analytic prevalence of major morbidity was 4.98% (95% CI, 3.31%-6.95%). The mean follow-up period was 25 (6-58) months. The weighted pooled proportion of symptom and QoL improvement was 78.50% (95% CI, 74.71%-82.03%) and 80.65% (95% CI, 75.80%-85.08%), respectively. The meta-analytic prevalence estimate of recurrence across the studies was 10.71% (95% CI, 7.74%-14.10%).

CONCLUSIONS

LRF is a feasible and safe procedure that provides symptom relief and improved QoL to the vast majority of patients. Although heterogeneously assessed, recurrence rates seem to be low. LRF should be considered a valuable treatment modality for patients with failed antireflux surgery.

Retrospective Review and Prospective Follow-up of 85 Consecutive Patients Treated With a Novel Hepatic-derived Surgical Mesh for Hiatal Hernia Repair: Outcomes, Surgical Complications, and Revisions

This study examined outcomes, surgical complications, and revisions in patients treated with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for hiatal hernia and substantial gastroesophageal reflux disease. In total, 85 consecutive patients who underwent hernia repair with MIROMESH Biologic Matrix, a novel hepatic-derived surgical mesh served as subjects. Subjects were contacted by phone, consented, and participated in an Institutional Review Board-approved structured phone interview. Responses were acquired from 73 of the 85 patients. The gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life showed significant improvement postoperatively. Subjects reported high satisfaction with the procedure. The use of proton pump inhibitors was significantly reduced. Three minor complications were reported; these were quickly resolved without further sequelae. There were no mesh-related complications. No subjects reported further surgery. Placement of the surgical mesh, during surgery, to reinforce the hiatal repair was easy and safe. Excellent outcomes and no revisions a mean of 1.3 years after surgery suggest that a durable repair had been achieved.

A Rare and Late Postoperative Complication of Nissen Fundoplication: Mixed Hiatus Hernia

How to cite this article: Kekilli M, Dogan Z, Karaahmet F. A Rare and Late Postoperative Complication of Nissen Fundoplication: Mixed Hiatus Hernia. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol, 2018;8(2):172.

Before and after Esophageal Surgery: Which Information Is Needed from the Functional Laboratory?

BACKGROUND

Indications for benign esophageal surgery and postoperative follow-up need to be highly elaborated with differentiated and structured algorithms, based on objective functional workup in the esophageal laboratory. Functional outcome is of utmost interest and has to be driven by the need for comprehensive but purposeful diagnostic methods.

METHODS

Preoperative diagnostic workup procedures by the functional laboratory include 24-h pH-monitoring, impedance testing, and high-resolution manometry (HRM) - in addition to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and barium swallow/timed barium esophagogram.

RESULTS

The most frequent indications for benign esophageal surgery are gastroesophageal reflux disease and achalasia; quite rare indications are esophageal diverticula and benign tumors. Esophageal motility testing in addition to 24-h pH-monitoring is crucial before antireflux surgery (ARS) in order to rule out ineffective esophageal motility and to tailor the wrap. With respect to achalasia surgery, the exact type of achalasia (I-III) has to be labeled according to the Chicago classification, and other motility disorders have to be excluded. The postoperative functional evaluation in the early phase (6 months) after either ARS or Heller's myotomy serves as the new baseline motility testing in case of later occurring disturbances in the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A complete and proper preoperative esophageal function assessment is crucial in order to rule out a primary motility disorder and to avoid postoperative functional complications.

Gastrothorax: A case of mistaken identity

•

Patients with a recent history of anti-reflux surgery, who present with a tension pneumothorax could be presenting with a gastrothorax.

•

They should always be treated with an intercostal catheter if they are in respiratory distress.

•

Follow up imaging with a CT scan is needed to confirm diagnosis.

•

Gastrothorax should be urgently managed with the insertion of a nasogastric tube and surgical decompression.

•

Good control of post- operative nausea and vomiting is essential in avoiding wrap failure and ensuing complications.

Introduction

Acute wrap failure post fundoplication is a rare but recognized complication and can be due to patient factors, disease factors and surgical factors. Herniation of the stomach into the thorax can mimic a pneumothorax clinically and radiologically and thus lead to bad outcomes for patients.

Presentation of case

We report the case of a 20-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with progressively worsening upper abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting followed by acute onset dyspnoea, six days post a laparoscopic repair of a small hiatus hernia and a Nissen fundoplication. His chest x-ray was consistent with that of a left sided pneumothorax and was therefore, appropriately resuscitated and treated with an intercostal catheter (ICC). A subsequent CT scan of the chest revealed a left gastrothorax. The patient was taken to theatre for the surgical reduction of the paraoesophageal hernia.

Discussion

Patients with a recent history of anti-reflux surgery, who present with a pneumothorax and respiratory distress or a tension pneumothorax should always be treated with an ICC. However, follow up imaging with a CT scan is essential to confirm diagnosis. Good control of post- operative nausea and vomiting is essential in avoiding wrap failure and ensuing complications.

Conclusion

A high index of suspicion for a gastrothorax mimicking a pneumothorax is important in the setting of recent anti-reflux surgery.

Laparoscopic revision surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a frequently performed procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in surgical clinics. Reflux can recur in between 3% and 30% of patients on whom antireflux surgery has been performed, and so revision surgery can be required due to recurrent symptoms or dysphagia in approximately 3% to 6% of the patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the mechanism of recurrences after antireflux surgery and to share our results after revision surgery in recurrent cases.From 2001 to 2014, revision surgery was performed on 43 patients (31 men, 12 women) between the ages of 24 and 70 years. The technical details of the first operation, recurrence symptoms, endoscopy, and manometry findings were evaluated. The findings of revision surgery, surgical techniques, morbidity rates, length of hospitalization, and follow-up period were also recorded and evaluated.The first operation was Nissen fundoplication in 34 patients and Toupet fundoplication in 9 patients. Mesh hiatoplasty was performed for enforcement in 18 (41.9%) of these patients. The period between the first operation and the revision surgery ranged from 4 days to 60 months. The most common finding was slipped fundoplication and presence of hiatal hernia during revision surgery. Revision fundoplication and hernia repair with mesh reinforcement were used in 33 patients. The other techniques were Collis gastroplasty, revision fundoplication, and hernia repair without mesh. The range of follow-up period was from 2 to 134 months. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients after revision surgery (6.9%). Although revision surgery is difficult and it has higher morbidity, it can be performed effectively and safely in experienced centers.

Feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of the laparoscopic Nissen-Hill hybrid repair

BACKGROUND

A novel antireflux procedure combining laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and Hill repair components was tested in 50 patients with paraesophageal hernia (PEH) and/or Barrett's esophagus (BE) because these two groups have been found to have a high rate of recurrence with conventional repairs.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic PEH and/or non-dysplastic BE underwent repair. Quality of life (QOL) metrics, manometry, EGD, and pH testing were administered pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent repair. There was no mortality and four major complications. At 13-month follow-up, there was one (2%) clinical recurrence, and two (4%) asymptomatic fundus herniations. Mean DeMeester scores improved from 57.2 to 7.7 (p < 0.0001). Control of preoperative symptoms was achieved in 90% with 6% resumption of antisecretory medication. All QOL metrics improved significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid Nissen-Hill repair for patients with PEH and BE appears safe and clinically effective at short-term follow-up. It is hoped that the combined structural components may reduce the rate of recurrence compared to existing repairs.

Acid suppression and surgical therapy for Barrett's oesophagus

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a common medical problem in developed countries, and is a risk factor for the development of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Both proton pump inhibitor therapy and antireflux surgery are effective at controlling endoscopic signs and symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with Barrett's oesophagus, but often fail to eliminate pathological oesophageal acid exposure. The current available studies strongly suggest that acid suppressive therapy, both pharmacological as well as surgical acid suppression, can reduce the risk the development and progression in patients with Barrett's oesophagus, but are not capable of complete prevention. No significant differences have been found between pharmacological and surgical therapy. For clinical practice, patients should be prescribed a proton pump inhibitor once daily as maintenance therapy, with the dose guided by symptoms. Antireflux surgery can be a good alternative to proton pump inhibitor therapy, but should be primarily offered to patients with symptomatic reflux, and not to asymptomatic patients with the rationale to protect against cancer.

The management of postoperative reflux in congenital esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Esophageal atresia (EA), with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), is associated with postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GER). We performed a systematic review of the literature regarding routine anti-reflux medication post EA-TEF repair and its impact on postoperative GER and associated complications.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, CENTRAL (Cochrane library) electronic databases and gray literature. Full-text screening was performed in duplicate. Included articles reported a primary diagnosis of EA-TEF, a secondary diagnosis of postoperative GER, and primary treatment of GER with anti-reflux medications.

RESULTS

Screening of 2,910 articles resulted in 25 articles (1,663 patients) for analysis. Most were single-center studies (92%) and retrospective (76%); there were no randomized control trials. Fifteen studies named the class of anti-reflux agent used, 3 the duration of therapy, and none either the dose prescribed or number of doses. Complications were inconsistently reported. Anti-reflux surgery was performed in 433/1,663 (26.0%) patients. Average follow-up was 53.2 months (14 studies).

CONCLUSION

The quality of literature regarding anti-reflux medication for GER post EA-TEF repair is poor. There are no well-outlined algorithms for anti-reflux agents, doses, or duration of therapy. Standardized protocols and reliable reporting are necessary to develop guidelines to better manage postoperative GER in EA-TEF patients.

Reoperation rates after laparoscopic fundoplication

INTRODUCTION

Current literature on redo antireflux surgery has limitations due to small sample size or single center experiences. This study aims to evaluate the reoperation rate of laparoscopic fundoplication in a large population database.

METHODS

A longitudinal version of the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database from 1995 to 2010 was used. Inclusion criteria were patients who received a laparoscopic fundoplication for uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or hiatal hernia. Patients were excluded if they had complications of GERD, esophageal or gastric cancer, prior esophageal or gastric surgery, vagotomy, esophageal dysmotility, and diaphragmatic hernia with gangrene or obstruction. The outcome was reoperation, specified as another fundoplication or reversal. Analysis was carried out via a Kaplan-Meier plot, hazard curve, and multivariate analysis adjusting for age, race, gender, comorbidities, insurance status, hospital teaching status, and year of procedure.

RESULTS

13,050 patients were included in the study. The 5 and 10-year cumulative reoperation rates were 5.2 % (95 % CI 4.8-5.7%) and 6.9 % (95 % CI 6.1-7.9%), respectively. Of these reoperations, 30 % were performed at a different hospital from that of the initial fundoplication. Reoperation rate was highest at 1 year post-operatively (1.7 % per year), and steadily declined until 4 years post-operatively, after which it remained at approximately 0.5 % per year. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly higher rates of reoperation among younger patients (HR = 3.56 for <30yo; HR = 1.89 for 30-50yo; HR = 1.65 for 50-65yo) and female patients (HR = 1.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one third of reoperations after failed laparoscopic fundoplication occur at a hospital different from the initial operation, which raises concern that existing literature does not reflect the true reoperation rate. The reoperation rate is highest in the first year postoperatively. The reasons for the higher rate of reoperation in females and younger patients remain unclear and warrant further study.

DYSPHAGIA AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL FUNDOPLICATION: anterior or posterior gastric wall fundoplication?

ContextThe occurrence of severe dysphagia after laparoscopic total fundoplication is currently an important factor associated with loss of quality of life in patients undergoing this modality of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.ObjectivesCompare the incidence and evaluate the causes of severe postoperative dysphagia in patients undergoing laparoscopic total fundoplication (LTF) without short gastric vessels division, using the anterior gastric wall (Rossetti LTF) or anterior and posterior gastric walls (Nissen LTF).MethodsAnalysis of the data of 289 patients submitted to LTF without short gastric vessels division from January 2004 to January 2012, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Patients were divided in Group 1 (Rossetti LTF – n = 160) and Group 2 (Nissen LTF – n = 129).ResultsThe overall incidence of severe postoperative dysphagia was 3.11% (4.37% in group 1 and 1.55% in group 2; P = 0.169). The need for surgical treatment of dysphagia was 2.5% in group 1 and 0.78% in group 2 (= 0.264). Distortions of the fundoplication were identified as possible causes of the dysphagia in all patients taken to redo fundoplication after Rossetti LTF. No wrap distortion was seen in redo fundoplication after Nissen LTF.ConclusionsThe overall incidence of severe postoperative dysphagia did not differ on the reported techniques. Only Rossetti LTF was associated with structural distortion of the fundoplication that could justify the dysphagia.

Post-operative management of esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula and gastroesophageal reflux: a Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons annual meeting survey

BACKGROUND

Esophageal atresia (EA), with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), is commonly associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) after surgical repair. One risk factor for anastomotic stricture is post-operative GER. This survey assessed practice patterns among attendees at the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons (CAPS) annual meeting with respect to management of GER post EA-TEF repair.

METHODS

A pre-piloted survey was handed out and collected at the 2012 CAPS annual meeting. Data were entered and coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated.

RESULTS

We distributed 70 surveys, and 57 (81.4%) surveys were returned. On average, the incidence of EA-TEF is 8-10 cases per institution, per year. Anti-reflux medication is started immediately post-operatively in 74% of patients at institution of feeds (11%), or if symptoms of reflux develop (14%). Proton pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists are used in approximately equal proportion. Patients are typically kept on anti-reflux medication for 3-6 months (37%) or 6-12 months (35%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most CAPS attendees treat postoperative GER prophylactically. However, there is no consistency in management strategy regarding which anti-reflux agent to use or for how long. A multi-centered study is required to establish a standardized protocol for the post-operative management of EA-TEF to prevent reflux and its effect on anastomotic strictures.

Barium esophagram: does it have a role in gastroesophageal reflux disease?

The barium esophagram is an integral part of the assessment and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) before, and especially after, antireflux procedures. While many of the findings on the examination can be identified with endosocopy, a gastric emptying study and an esophageal motility examination, the barium esophagram is better at demonstrating the anatomic findings after anti-reflux surgery, especially in symptomatic patients. These complementary examinations, when taken as a whole, fully evaluate a patient with suspected GERD as well as symptomatic patients after antireflux procedures.

Radiologic and endoscopic characteristics of laparoscopic antireflux wrap: correlation with outcome

After antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease, 10% to 15% of patients may have unsuccessful results as a result of abnormal restoration of the esophagogastric junction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the postoperative endoscopic and radiologic characteristics of the antireflux barrier and their correlation with the postoperative results. After surgery, endoscopic and radiologic features of the antireflux wrap were evaluated in 120 consecutive patients. Jobe's classification of the postoperative valve was used for the definition of a "normal" or "defective" wrap. Patients were evaluated 3 to 5 years later in order to determine the clinical and objective failed fundoplication. A "normal" antireflux wrap was associated with successful results in 81.7% of the patients. On the contrary, defective radiologic or endoscopic antireflux wrap was observed in 19% of cases. Among these patients, hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter was observed in 50% to 65% of patients, abnormal 24-hour pH monitoring in 91%, and recurrent postoperative erosive esophagitis in 50% of patients, respectively (P < 0.001). "Defective" antireflux fundoplication is associated with recurrent reflux symptoms, presence of endoscopic esophagitis, hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter, and abnormal acid reflux.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: side effects and complications of fundoplication

Even skilled surgeons will have complications after antireflux surgery. Fortunately, the mortality is low (<1%) with laparoscopic surgery, immediate postoperative morbidity is uncommon (5%-20%), and conversion to an open operation is <2.5%. Common late postoperative complications include gas-bloat syndrome (up to 85%), dysphagia (10%-50%), diarrhea (18%-33%), and recurrent heartburn (10%-62%). Most of these complications improve during the 3-6 months after surgery. Dietary modifications, pharmacologic therapies, and esophageal dilation may be helpful. Failures after antireflux surgery usually occur within the first 2 years after the initial operation. They fall into 5 patterns: herniation of the fundoplication into the chest, slipped fundoplication, tight fundoplication, paraesophageal hernia, and malposition of the fundoplication. Reoperation rates range from 0%-15% and should be performed by experienced foregut surgeons.

Re-operation for failed gastro-esophageal fundoplication. What results to expect?

The aim of this study is to evaluate short and medium term results of re-operation for failed fundoplication in a retrospective monocentric cohort of 47 patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2011, 595 patients underwent a laparoscopic primary fundoplication (PFP) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). During the same period, 47 patients required a re-operative fundoplication (RFP). In 11 patients, the original wrap had herniated into the thorax. All these revisions consisted of a complete takedown of the original wrap before constructing a tension-free wrap using a standardized technique. Patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years were matched to patients who had been operated only once to assess satisfaction and quality of life.

RESULTS

Short term: All patients were operated by laparoscopy with no conversion. There was no mortality. Two postoperative complications necessitating re-operation were observed (morbidity 4.3%): one complete aphagia and one gastric perforation. Long term: 29 re-operated patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years (mean: 4,5 years) (Group RFP) were compared to a matched group of 29 patients operated only once (Group PFP). These groups were comparable in age, sex ratio, BMI and follow-up. In both groups, all patients were operated by laparoscopy without conversion. Morbidity was 3.5% in the RFP group, none in the PFP group. There was no mortality in either group. The length of stay and operative time were significantly higher in the RFP group (4.6 vs. 2.6 days, p<0.05). Two RFP patients (5%) required re-operation at three and seven months vs. none in the PFP group. The long-term satisfaction was comparable in the two groups (78% vs. 85%, p=NS). Quality of life assessed by the GIQLI was significantly better in the PFP group (104 vs. 84, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Re-do fundoplication is a safe procedure and is feasible by laparoscopy. In the long-term, patient satisfaction is comparable to primary intervention with, however, a slightly poorer quality of life.

Laparoscopic revision of failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is an accepted treatment for persistent gastroesophageal reflux but about 4% of patients will eventually require revision surgery.

METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Collaboration, Medline, and EMBASE databases, augmented by Google Scholar and PubMed related articles from January 1, 1990, to November 22, 2010. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 930 surgeries.

RESULTS

The mean surgical duration was 166 minutes and conversion to open revision fundoplication was required in 7% of cases. Complications were reported in 14% of cases and the mean length of stay varied between 1.2 and 6 days. A good to excellent result was reported for 84% of surgeries and 5% of patients required a further revisional procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic revision antireflux surgery appears to be feasible and safe, but subject to somewhat greater risk of conversion, higher morbidity, longer hospital stay, and poorer outcomes than primary laparoscopic fundoplication.

Minimal vs extensive esophageal mobilization during laparoscopic fundoplication: a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has been traditionally performed with extensive esophageal dissection to create 2 to 3 cm of intraabdominal esophagus. Retrospective data have suggested that minimal esophageal mobilization may reduce the risk of postoperative herniation of the wrap into the lower mediastinum. To compare complete esophageal dissection to leaving the phrenoesophageal attachment intact, we conducted a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial.

METHODS

After obtaining permission/assent, patients were randomized to circumferential division of the phrenoesophageal attachments (MAX) or minimal mobilization with no violation of the phrenoesophageal membrane (MIN). A contrast study was performed at 1 year. The primary outcome variable was postoperative wrap herniation.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-seven patients were enrolled in the study (MIN, n = 90; MAX, n = 87) from February 2006 to May 2008. There were no differences in demographics or operative time. Contrast studies were performed in 64 MIN and 71 MAX patients, respectively. The transmigration rate was 30% in the MAX group compared with 7.8% in the MIN group (P = .002). The reoperation rate was 18.4% in the MAX group and 3.3% in the MIN group (P = .006)

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal esophageal mobilization during laparoscopic fundoplication decreases postoperative wrap transmigration and the need for a redo operation.

Acute Chest Presentation following a Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication

We describe a case of an acute paraoesophageal hernia in the early post-operative period following a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Patient developed intraoperative tension pneumothorax requiring an immediate chest drain and subsequently needed respiratory support of a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) ventilation. A short discussion of this rare but deleterious complication and the difficulty of making a prompt diagnosis are included as delayed revision surgery can be technically challenging with a poor outcome.

Pledgeted mattress sutures reduce recurrent reflux after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

INTRODUCTION

In response to a perceived increase in the incidence of recurrent reflux after adopting the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, we adjusted our technique to include the use of pledgeted, horizontal mattress sutures for crural closure and wrap construction.

METHODS

We assessed the impact of this technical modification in children who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication between 1997 and 2007 at a large children's hospital. The medical history, indications, technical details, and outcomes were reviewed. Differences between groups were assessed with chi(2), logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 384 subjects were identified. Neurologic deficits were present in 77%. The crural closure and wrap were constructed with simple sutures in 226 and with pledgeted, horizontal mattress sutures in 158. The cumulative incidences of recurrent reflux, gagging/retching, wrap failure on imaging studies, and reoperation were significantly greater with the use of simple sutures (P < .01, .03, < .01, and < .01, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a significant difference in the probability of recurrent reflux with simple sutures despite a significant difference in postoperative follow-up. Operative time was the same with both methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of pledgeted, horizontal mattress sutures for crural closure and wrap construction in laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication may reduce the incidence of recurrent reflux.

Laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplication and hiatal herniorraphy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms of failure after laparoscopic fundoplication and the results of revision laparoscopic fundoplication.

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has become the most commonly performed antireflux procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, with success rates from 90 to 95%. Persistent or new symptoms often warrant endoscopic and radiographic studies to find the cause of surgical failure. In experienced hands, reoperative antireflux surgery can be done laparoscopically. We performed a retrospective analysis of all laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplications done by the principle author and the respective fellow within the laparoscopic fellowship from 1992 to 2006.

METHODS

A review was performed on patients who underwent laparoscopic revision of a failed primary laparoscopic fundoplication.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplication was performed on 68 patients between 1992 and 2006. The success rate of the laparoscopic redo Nissen fundoplication was 86%. Symptoms prior to the revision procedure included heartburn (69%), dysphagia (8.8%), or both (11.7%). Preoperative evaluation revealed esophagitis in 41%, hiatal hernia with esophagitis in 36%, hiatal hernia without esophagitis in 7.3%, stenosis in 11.74%, and dysmotility in 2.4%. The main laparoscopic revisions included fundoplication alone (41%) or fundoplication with hiatal hernia repair (50%). Four gastric perforations occurred; these were repaired primarily without further incident. An open conversion was performed in 1 patient. Length of stay was 2.5 +/- 1.0 days. Mean follow-up was 22 months (range, 6-42), during which failure of the redo procedure was noted in 9 patients (13.23%).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic redo antireflux surgery, performed in a laparoscopic fellowship program, produces excellent results that approach the success rates of primary operations.

Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Outcome and morbidity of redo antireflux surgery are suggested to be less satisfactory than those of primary surgery. Studies reporting on redo surgery, however, are usually much smaller than those of primary surgery. The aim of this study was to summarize the currently available literature on redo antireflux surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A structured literature search was performed in the electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

A total of 81 studies met the inclusion criteria. The study design was prospective in 29, retrospective in 15, and not reported in 37 studies. In these studies, 4,584 reoperations in 4,509 patients are reported. Recurrent reflux and dysphagia were the most frequent indications; intraoperative complications occurred in 21.4% and postoperative complications in 15.6%, with an overall mortality rate of 0.9%. The conversion rate in laparoscopic surgery was 8.7%. Mean(+/-SEM) duration of surgery was 177.4 +/- 10.3 min and mean hospital stay was 5.5 +/- 0.5 days. Symptomatic outcome was successful in 81.1% and was equal in the laparoscopic and conventional approach. Objective outcome was obtained in 24 studies (29.6%) and success was reported in 78.3%, with a slightly higher success rate in case of laparoscopy than with open surgery (85.8% vs. 78.0%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review on redo antireflux surgery has confirmed that morbidity and mortality after redo surgery is higher than after primary surgery and symptomatic and objective outcome are less satisfactory. Data on objective results were scarce and consistency with regard to reporting outcome is necessary.

[Hiatus hernia and recurrence : the Achilles heel of antireflux surgery?]

Long-term studies show good postoperative results after laparoscopic antireflux surgery, but still approximately 10% of patients suffer from new or recurrent symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In the majority of cases the symptoms are caused by morphological changes of the fundic wrap or are related to the hiatal closure. Closure of the esophageal hiatus is therefore becoming more and more the key point of antireflux surgery. The aim of this study was to show the problems caused by the esophageal hiatus and to offer possible solutions. Therefore 1,201 laparoscopic antireflux procedures and 240 refundoplications performed in our department between 1993 and 2007 were analyzed with respect to morphologic reasons for failures and the corresponding symptoms. The most common morphological reason for complications after surgery was failure of the hiatal closure with consecutive intrathoracic migration of the fundic wrap, the so-called slipped Nissen. In the past the typical problems after open antireflux surgery were either that the wrap was too loose, a breakdown of the wrap or a so-called telescope phenomenon, all caused by failure of the fundic wrap and now a rarity since laparoscopic surgery. Even after repeated laparoscopic refundoplications the main problem was always the hiatus. This shows the importance of the crural closure and the necessity of a specific definition of size and form of the hiatus.The aim of this study was to initiate a discussion leading to a new definition of the hiatus with the focus on the "hiatal surface area" for a better basis for comparison of the published results of antireflux or hiatal surgery.

Current controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair

The management of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has become one of the most widely debated and controversial areas in surgery. PEHs are relatively uncommon, often presenting in patients entering their seventh or eighth decades of life. Patients who have PEH often bear complicating medical comorbidities making them potentially poor operative candidates. Taking this into account makes surgical management of these patients all the more complex. Many considerations must be taken into account in formulating a management strategy for patients who have PEHs, and these considerations have led surgeons into ongoing debates in recent decades.

Laparoscopic revisional fundoplication with circular hiatal mesh prosthesis: the long-term results

BACKGROUND

Failure of hiatal closure has proven to be the most frequent complication leading to revisional surgery after primary failed open or laparoscopic antireflux surgery. To prevent hiatal hernia recurrence some authors recommend the use of prosthetic meshes for reinforcement of the hiatal crura. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a circular hiatal onlay mesh prosthesis applied during laparoscopic refundoplication after primary failed antireflux surgery with intrathoracic wrap migration. The follow-up period was 5 years.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients underwent laparoscopic refundoplication for recurrent symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease after primary failed laparoscopic or open antireflux surgery. The underlying morphological complication for symptom recurrence in all patients was hiatal hernia recurrence with intrathoracic migration of the fundoplication. During revisional surgery, after breakdown of the former fundoplication, the esophageal hiatus was thoroughly revised and a circular polypropylene mesh was used to buttress the primarily simple sutured hiatal crura. Additionally, in all patients a refundoplication was performed. Recurrences, complications, functional data, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and cinematographic X-ray results, as well as quality of life data, were evaluated for the 60-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

All reoperations were successfully completed laparoscopically. Twenty-one patients underwent laparoscopic 360 degrees "floppy" Nissen refundoplication, and 12 patients underwent laparoscopic 270 degrees Toupet refundoplication. Hiatal closure was performed by placing a circular polypropylene sheet that had a 3-4 cm keyhole for the esophageal body. Of 24 patients who underwent redo-surgery before May 2000, no patient developed a recurrent hiatal hernia during the first 12 postoperative months. All 33 patients were re-evaluated and underwent complete diagnostic work-up over a follow-up period of 60 months postoperatively. During the long-term follow-up, a new recurrent hiatal hernia with intrathoracic wrap migration developed in 2 patients (6%). In both cases, slippage occurred anteriorly to the esophagus. Both patients were scheduled for repeat refundoplication. In all other patients no recurrence occurred for the complete follow-up period, and no mesh-related complications developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic refundoplication for primary failed hiatal closure with the use of a circular mesh prosthesis is a safe and effective procedure to prevent hiatal hernia recurrence for short- and mid-term follow-up. However, for long-term follow-up, even with the placement of prosthetic mesh, re-recurrence occurs in some patients, leading to repeated surgery.

Endoscopic therapy for GERD: does it have a future?

Approximately 20% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have symptoms refractory to long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Furthermore, PPI therapy is expensive. Fundoplication is considered the gold standard of GERD therapy in terms of normalization of esophageal acid exposure and symptom control; however, this exposes the patient to the risks of surgery and anesthesia. Therefore, an endoscopic approach to treating GERD that obviates the need for PPIs and avoids surgical morbidity is desirable. Several endoscopic methods have been used, including radiofrequency ablation, implantation of foreign substances as bulking agents, and various tissue apposition strategies. The emerging field of GERD endotherapy is promising, but more rigorous, sham-controlled, long-term studies are required to elucidate its exact role in clinical practice. This review discusses the evolution of these concepts, describes specific endoscopic devices that have been developed, and explores the future of endotherapies as viable treatment alternatives for GERD.

Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: key to success in the community setting

Studies from large volume centers of excellence have proven the efficacy of laparoscopic antireflux surgery. However, the majority of these operations are performed in community hospitals, where the results are more variable. Major issues potentially affecting laparoscopic antireflux surgery in community hospitals include a) the individual skills and experience of the surgeons, b) the volume of operations per surgeon and hospital, and c) the sophistication of the esophageal motility labs evaluating these patients prior to surgery. Another evolving issue is the increasing number of fundoplication failures and where best to evaluate and treat these patients.

Strangulated stomach within a paraoesophageal hernia: a rare complication of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

A strangulated stomach within a paraoesophageal hernia is a rare complication following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. A case is presented together with a review of the clinical presentation, mechanism and diagnostic difficulties of this entity.

The many manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: presentation, evaluation, and treatment

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common problem that is expensive to diagnose and treat. The disease is increasing in prevalence in the Western world, with important risk factors being obesity and the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Heartburn and acid regurgitation are classic symptoms of GERD, but their sensitivity is poor. Ambulatory esophageal pH testing is the most sensitive test for GERD, whereas endoscopy is the most specific test. Medical treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has revolutionized the treatment of GERD and its complications, but long-term side effects do exist. Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and PPIs have similar efficacy in the few available long-term trials. This article reviews the presentation, evaluation, and treatment of GERD.

Gastrooesophageal reflux disease

Gastrooesophageal reflux disease, GERD, is a common problem which is expensive to diagnose and treat. The disease is increasing in prevalence in the Western world with important risk factors being obesity and the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Increasing research points to transient LES relaxation and spatial separation of the diaphragm and LES (hiatal hernia in chest) being the critical mechanisms of acid reflux. Heartburn and acid regurgitation are classic symptoms of GERD, but their sensitivity is poor. Ambulatory oesophageal pH testing is the most sensitive test for GERD, while endoscopy is the most specific test. Medical treatment with PPIs has revolutionized the treatment of GERD and its complications, but long-term side effects do exist. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery and PPIs have similar efficacy in the few available long-term trials. Currently, endoscopic treatments for GERD should not be a clinical alternative outside of research trials. New drug therapies should be directed at modulating transient LES relaxation.

Laparoscopic fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure

BACKGROUND

Despite the good results reported after laparoscopic fundoplication, failure is still a major problem. Hiatal disruption is one of the common patterns of anatomical failure. The aim of this study was to compare the results of suture repair of diaphragmatic crura with routine polypropylene mesh reinforcement in addition to suture repair.

METHODS

A total of 551 patients who underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease between March 1998 and July 2004 were included into the study. Crural closure had been performed with simple primary suture repair alone between March 1998 and July 2002 (n = 335, group I), and mesh reinforcement of the hiatal repair was performed routinely thereafter (n = 176, group II). These groups were evaluated prospectively.

RESULTS

We observed a significantly lower rate of recurrence in group II than in group I. After a 2-year follow-up, the rate of anatomic morphologic recurrence was 6.0% in group I and 1.8% in group II. Considering the recurrence rate, there was significant statistical difference. The overall recurrence rate in our series was 4.6%. There was no correlation between the size of the hernia and recurrence. No significant difference was found between groups regarding the rate of postoperative dysphagia. We have not observed any complications related to the use of polypropylene mesh in group II.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that polypropylene mesh reinforcement increases the success rate for laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair without causing an additional complication burden. We propose routine use of mesh reinforcement in laparascopic antireflux surgery.

The use of biosynthetic mesh to enhance hiatal repair at the time of redo Nissen fundoplication

OBJECTIVE

There are a number of reports in the literature describing the need for a redo fundoplication in patients who have previously undergone open fundoplication. However, these data are not well characterized in our current era of laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this report is to document the management of patients requiring a redo fundoplication who originally underwent a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

METHODS

After internal review board approval, the senior surgeon performed a retrospective chart review on all patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication between January 2000 and April 2006. Data collected included the patient's age, sex, neurologic impairment, need for gastrostomy, time interval between the initial and redo fundoplication, operative approach for the redo fundoplication, use of a biologic patch for the redo procedure, and length of follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-three patients underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication by the senior author during this time interval. Twenty-one patients have required a redo fundoplication and repair of the enlarged hiatus after laparoscopic fundoplication. No patient has undergone a redo procedure without the development of transmigration of the fundoplication wrap. A redo operation was performed without mesh in 13 patients, of which there were 4 recurrences (31%). The other 8 cases were repaired with Surgisis (Cook, Inc, Bloomington, Ind), and none of these have recurred, with a minimum of 11 months' follow-up and a mean follow-up of 26 months. In the 4 patients requiring a second redo procedure, the enlarged esophageal hiatus was reinforced with Surgisis, and none of these cases have recurred, with a minimum of 3 years' follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the use of a biosynthetic mesh to reinforce the crural closure during the repair of iatrogenic hiatal hernias in children.

The current role of laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants and children

BACKGROUND

The benefits of surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in infants and children have been questioned in the recent literature. The goal of this review was to determine the best current practice for the diagnosis and management of this disease.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed for all recent English language publications on the management of GERD in 8- to 10-year-old patients.

RESULTS

In infants and children, GERD has multiple etiologies, and an understanding of these is important for determining which patients are the best surgical candidates. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have become the mainstay of current treatment for primary GERD. Although laparoscopic surgery appears to be better than open surgery, there remains some morbidity and complications that careful patient selection can minimize.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for GERD should be performed only after failure of medical management or for specific problems that mandate it.

Use of esophagocrural sutures and minimal esophageal dissection reduces the incidence of postoperative transmigration of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication wrap

OBJECTIVES

Herniation of the fundoplication wrap through the esophageal hiatus is a common reason for surgical failure in children who have undergone laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Extensive mobilization of the gastroesophageal junction in combination with decreased adhesions after laparoscopy may contribute to the development of this complication. In an attempt to decrease the incidence of wrap migration, we changed our technique to minimal mobilization of the intraabdominal esophagus and to placement of esophageal-crural sutures. In this study, we investigate the impact of these modifications on outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication by the senior author (GWH) from January 2000 through December 2004. Those undergoing operation with extensive esophageal mobilization and without esophagocrural sutures (January 2000 to March 2002) (group I) were compared with those in whom there was minimal esophageal dissection with placement of these esophagocrural sutures (April 2002 to December 2004) (group II).

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-nine patients underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication during the study period. One hundred thirty patients were in group I, and 119 patients were in group II. The rate of transmigration decreased from 12% in group I to 5% in group II (P = .072). The relative risk of transmigration with extensive esophageal mobilization and without the esophagocrural sutures was 2.29.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study has shown that placement of esophagocrural sutures and minimization of the dissection around the esophagus results in a more than 2-fold reduction in the risk of wrap transmigration after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Pneumonia lipóide exógena: importância da história clínica no diagnóstico

A pneumonia lipóide é uma doença rara, resultante da microaspiração de formulações lipídicas. Para seu diagnóstico, o grau de suspeição clínica deve ser elevado. Relata-se o caso de uma mulher com passado de câncer de mama, apresentando dispnéia e tosse progressivas e infiltrado pulmonar bilateral na radiografia. A suspeita de linfangite carcinomatosa com indicação de quimioterapia foi questionada por achados não usuais na tomografia computadorizada de alta resolução e história de ingestão crônica de laxantes contendo óleo mineral. A biópsia pulmonar confirmou pneumonia lipóide, que deve ser considerada em pacientes com pneumopatia difusa e exposição a potenciais agentes causadores.

Laparoscopic modified Thal fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux in a patient with severe scoliosis and sliding esophageal hiatal hernia

A 14-year-old girl with severe scoliosis and sliding esophageal hiatal hernia underwent laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux. Of various fundoplication procedures, anterior partial fundoplication (Thal fundoplication) was performed because it is effective, with less postoperative gas bloat syndrome. Laparoscopic fundoplication in severely scoliotic children could allow improved operative visibility and easier access to the hiatus in comparison with the open approach. In our "modified anterior partial fundoplication," the sutures between the crura and the esophagus and the sutures on the left of esophageal wall with the fundus of the stomach could be exactly performed by laparoscopic surgical technique. The wrapping of the esophagus in fundoplication was done over the ventral 180 degrees to 270 degrees. Six months postoperatively, the patient did not develop gas bloat syndrome, distal esophageal obstruction from fundoplication, and delayed gastric emptying. Modified anterior partial fundoplication achieves effective control of reflux symptoms.

Endoluminal and transluminal surgery: current status and future possibilities

The field of minimally invasive surgery has seen tremendous growth since the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in 1987. The key question is not how successful these techniques are currently, but rather where may they lead in the future? New technologies promise to usher in an era of even less invasive procedures. The terms being coined in the literature include "incisionless," "endoluminal," "transluminal," and "natural orifice" transluminal endoscopic surgery. These techniques certainly have the potential to become the next wave of minimally invasive procedures. A recent editorial in Surgical Endoscopy by Macfadyen and Cuschieri highlighted the ongoing developments in endoscopic surgery and stressed the critical importance of surgeons being involved in future applications and permutations of these techniques [1]. There are early signs of such involvement. The work of numerous investigators in the field was presented recently at the 2005 Digestive Disease Week. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons, recently organized a postgraduate course in endoluminal therapy at the spring 2005 meeting held in Hollywood, Florida. The course is being offered again at the 2006 SAGES annual meeting. Similar courses are being offered at other regional and national meetings. This review attempts to highlight some of the available and evolving endoluminal therapies reviewed at that forum, including techniques for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoluminal bariatric surgery, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and transgastric endoscopic surgery, as well as new technologies and possible future directions in luminal access surgery.