Clinical analysis of the predictive factors for recurrent appendicitis after initial nonoperative treatment of perforated appendicitis

Rate of Neoplasia in Patients with Complicated Acute Appendicitis Managed Nonoperatively: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest the rate of neoplasia in patients with complicated acute appendicitis initially managed nonoperatively is higher than previously reported.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of neoplasia in patients with complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients who presented to a tertiary care center with acute appendicitis between 2019 and 2023. Patients with complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively were included in the study cohort. Patient demographics, clinical course, radiological findings, and pathologic information were collected. The primary outcome was rate of neoplasia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of appendiceal neoplasia.

RESULTS

In total, we identified 1166 patients with acute appendicitis, of whom 75 patients had complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively (median age 51 years [interquartile range 38-68]; 36 [48%] were female). Fifty-four (72%) patients had their appendix removed due to failure of nonoperative management, recurrent symptoms, suspicion of neoplasia, or elective surgery. The neoplasia rate among patients with complicated appendicitis initially treated nonoperatively was 16.0% (12/75). Two patients with neoplasia were younger than 40 years of age. Suspicion of malignancy on initial imaging was associated with an increased risk of appendiceal neoplasia (odds ratio 8.13, 95% confidence interval 1.20-55.15; p = 0.03). Age, sex, and appendiceal diameter were not significantly associated with appendiceal neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

The high rate of appendiceal neoplasia in patients with complicated appendicitis treated nonoperatively should be a factor in decision making for interval appendectomy for patients of all ages.

Efficacy of Antibiotic Therapy Alone Versus Antibiotics With Percutaneous Drainage in Periappendiceal Abscess: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies. Simple appendicitis can be a complicated periappendiceal abscess. Despite the fact that there are several treatment options for periappendiceal abscesses, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment method; some surgeons prefer appendectomy, while others prefer relying on non-operative approaches using antibiotic therapy with or without percutaneous drainage. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of antibiotics-only therapy to antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage in the management of periappendicular abscess. An electronic database and clinical trial register search was performed on the PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane libraries. After the removal of duplicate records, the studies went through a screening process to determine their eligibility. A meta-analysis was performed for the length of hospital stay and treatment success rate for the comparison groups (antibiotics-only and antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage), in which the mean difference with a 95% confidence interval, and odds ratio using the Mantel-Haenszel method were calculated. The heterogeneity among the studies was assessed using the I2 value. Four studies were included in the review and the meta-analysis. Most of the included studies had a retrospective design with the exception of one study, which was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 1,422 patients were included in the four studies; the majority of them (1192, 83.8%) received antibiotics only for the treatment of periappendiceal abscesses, while the rest (230, 16.2%) had percutaneous drainage plus antibiotic therapy. Patients in the antibiotics-only group had a statistically significant mean difference of 2.77 (confidence interval (CI): 3.99-1.55) days of hospital stay less than the percutaneous drainage plus antibiotics group, with a P-value of <0.001. Moreover, they had an average odds ratio of 0.51 (CI: 0.08-3.27) of having more treatment success than the percutaneous drainage plus antibiotics group. However, this was not statistically significant, with a P-value of 0.47. In conclusion, antibiotics-only therapy had a slightly higher odds ratio in terms of treatment success, but this was not statistically significant. In addition, patients in the antibiotics-only group had a decreased length of hospital stay. On the other hand, patients in the antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage group had lower rates of recurrence and required fewer interval appendectomies. More well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to further solidify the evidence.

Predictive factors for recurrent acute appendicitis after conservative treatment

INTRODUCTION

Conservative treatment of acute appendicitis is gaining popularity, and identifying patients with a higher risk of recurrence is becoming increasingly important. Previous studies have suggested that older age, male sex, diabetes, appendicolith and abscess formation may be contributing factors, however, results from the adult population are inconsistent.

AIM

This study aims to identify predictive factors for recurrent appendicitis after conservative treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with conservatively treated acute appendicitis at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden during 2012-2019. Information on patient demographics at index admission and follow-up data were retrieved from medical charts and radiologic images. Uni -and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed using Stata Statistical Software.

RESULTS

In total, 379 patients with conservatively treated acute appendicitis were identified, of which 78 (20.6%) had recurrence. All patients were followed-up for a minimum of 41 months after the first diagnosis of acute appendicitis unless appendectomy after successful conservative treatment or death occurred during follow-up. The median time to recurrence was 6.5 (1-17.8) months. After multivariable logistic regression analysis, external appendix diameter >10 mm [OR 2.4 (CI 1.37-4.21), p = .002] and intra-abdominal abscess [OR 2.05 (CI 1.18-3.56), p = .011] on computed tomography were significant independent risk factors for recurrent appendicitis. Appendicolith was not associated with an increased risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests abscess formation and appendix distension of >10 mm to be potential risk factors for recurrent acute appendicitis after initial successful conservative treatment.

Hidden Appendicoliths and Their Impact on the Severity and Treatment of Acute Appendicitis

Background/Objectives: In patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UAA), the absence of calcified deposits or stones, called appendicoliths, often leads to consideration of non-operative treatment (NOT), despite the notable treatment failure rate associated with this approach. Previous research has indirectly estimated the prevalence of appendicoliths to range between 15% and 38% retrospectively by CT scan, intraoperative palpation, and pathology report, thereby potentially missing certain concrements. Our hypothesis proposes that this reported prevalence significantly underestimates the occurrence of appendicoliths, which could explain the high failure rate of 29% of patients with appendicitis observed with NOT. Methods: In our prospective study, conducted with a cohort of 56 adult patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis (AA), we employed intraoperative extracorporeal incisions of the vermiform appendix, in addition to standard diagnostic methods. Results: Our findings revealed 50% more appendicoliths by intraoperative incision (n = 36, p < 0.001) compared to preoperative imaging (n = 24). Appendicoliths were present in 71.4% (n = 40, p < 0.001) of AA patients. Conclusions: These results suggest that conventional diagnostic procedures plausibly underestimate the actual prevalence of appendicoliths, potentially elucidating the frequent treatment failures observed in NOT approaches applied to patients with UAA.

SAGES guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis is an extremely common disease with a variety of medical and surgical treatment approaches. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians and patients in decisions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted from 2010 to 2022 to answer 8 key questions relating to the diagnosis of appendicitis, operative or nonoperative management, and specific technical and post-operative issues for appendectomy. The results of this systematic review were then presented to a panel of adult and pediatric surgeons. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts.

RESULTS

Conditional recommendations were made in favor of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis being managed operatively, either delayed (>12h) or immediate operation (<12h), either suction and lavage or suction alone, no routine drain placement, treatment with short-term antibiotics postoperatively for complicated appendicitis, and complicated appendicitis previously treated nonoperatively undergoing interval appendectomy. A conditional recommendation signals that the benefits of adhering to a recommendation probably outweigh the harms although it does also indicate uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations should provide guidance with regard to current controversies in appendicitis. The panel also highlighted future research opportunities where the evidence base can be strengthened.

Factors associated with recurrent appendicitis after nonoperative management

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to identify predictors for recurrent appendicitis in patients with appendicitis previously treated nonoperatively.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of all adult patients with appendicitis treated at a tertiary care hospital. Patient demographics, radiographic information, management, and clinical outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was recurrent appendicitis within 6 months after discharge from the index admission. Given the competing risk of interval appendectomy, a time-to-event competing-risk analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 699 patients presenting with appendicitis, 74 were treated nonoperatively (35 [47%] were women; median [IQR] age, 48 [33,64] years), and 21 patients (29%) had recurrent appendicitis. On univariate and multivariate analysis, presence of an appendicolith on imaging was the only factor associated with a higher risk of recurrent appendicitis (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of appendicolith was associated with an increased risk of developing recurrent appendicitis within 6 months.

Follow-up ultrasonographic findings among children treated conservatively for uncomplicated acute appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is an accurate tool for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Conservative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis is feasible and safe in children. However, no sonographic follow-up results from children with nonoperatively managed acute appendicitis have been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the sonographic appearance of the appendix at follow-up ultrasound and to attempt to identify signs predictive of recurrent acute appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis and treated conservatively in our hospital from 2014 to 2019, and who presented for follow-up ultrasound at 3, 6 and 9 months, were included in our study. Clinical, laboratory and ultrasound data were recorded.

RESULTS

By the end of follow-up, 29 (14.2%) of 204 children in the cohort had developed recurrent acute appendicitis and 175 had recovered uneventfully. On follow-up ultrasound, appendiceal diameter measured > 6 mm in 56/204 (27.5%) cases at 3 months and in 9/26 (34.5%) at 6 months. After 3 months, 102/204 (50%) children had normal appendiceal diameter on ultrasound. Appendiceal diameter > 6 mm was associated with intraluminal fluid or sludge in the appendiceal lumen at 3- and 6-month follow-up (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Comparing cases with and without recurrence, at 3-month follow-up, appendiceal diameter > 6 mm was found in 17/29 (58.6%) cases vs. 39/175 (22.3%), respectively (P < 0.001). Appendiceal diameter returned to normal in 12/19 (63.2%) cases in the nonrecurrent acute appendicitis group compared with 2/7 (28.6%) in the recurrent acute appendicitis group (P = 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Intraluminal fluid or sludge was detected more frequently in the recurrent acute appendicitis versus the nonrecurrent acute appendicitis group at 3- (P < 0.001) and 6-month (P = 0.001) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Progressive normalization of appendiceal diameter was noted on follow-up ultrasound. The prevalence of both appendiceal diameter > 6 mm and intraluminal fluid or sludge were found to be increased in children who later developed recurrent acute appendicitis. Ultrasound appears to be a useful tool for follow-up in children with conservatively treated uncomplicated acute appendicitis and possibly might help predict recurrence.

Appendicoliths, the little giants: A narrative review

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review aims to collate the data in the existing literature on appendicoliths, by reviewing the available information on appendicoliths that have been previously reported in 24 publications, and providing the information in one article.

KEY FINDINGS

Appendicoliths are frequent culprits in causing luminal obstruction of the appendix, leading to appendicitis. They are calcified masses formed as a result of the aggregation of faecal particulates and inorganic salts within the lumen of the appendix. The presence of appendicoliths in an inflamed appendix influences the patient's treatment, as surgery is usually done to avoid appendix perforation and abscess formation, and also to prevent a future recurrence of the disease. Appendicoliths are mostly imaged using CT, Ultrasound, and plain X-rays; however, CT is the most frequently used modality, particularly in the imaging of complications caused by 'retained' appendicoliths. 'Retained' appendicoliths and their consequential abscesses have been reported in the sub-hepatic and intrahepatic regions, pelvic and tubo-ovarian regions, gluteal region, subcutaneous layer, subphrenic region, and through the diaphragm into the chest cavity.

CONCLUSION

This review provides useful information on the imaging appearances and complications caused by the presence of appendicoliths in an inflamed appendix, and it also provides information on the clinical implications of 'dropped' appendicoliths during appendectomy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Based on the findings of this review, it is recommended that the appropriate imaging modality (ultrasound and/or CT) should be considered when imaging appendicoliths and its complications. It is also suggested that retained appendicolith be considered a differential diagnosis when imaging patients with a history of appendectomy due to complicated appendicitis/perforation.

Risk Factors of Recurrent Appendiceal Abscess after Initial Non-Surgical Treatment without Drainage of Children with Appendiceal Abscess: A Single Center Retrospective Review

Background: Exploration of the risk factors of recurrent appendiceal abscess after initial non-surgical treatment without drainage in children with appendiceal abscess. Patients and Methods: The medical records of all children diagnosed with appendiceal abscess and who were treated conservatively in the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from June 2012 to June 2020 were collected. The collected cases were divided into the recurrent group and the non-recurrent group, and all clinical indicators were compared. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for recurrent appendiceal abscess in children. Results: One hundred twenty-four patients were included and among them, 62 (50.0%) had clinical manifestations of recurrent appendiceal abscess (the recurrent group) and five patients (8%) suffered several instances of recurrence. Duration of intravenous antibiotic agents (odds ratio [OR], 0.905; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.820-1.000) was independently associated with the recurrence of appendiceal abscess. The risk of recurrence was increased in children with the white blood cell (WBC) count at discharge greater than 8 × 10⁹/L (OR, 2.702; 95% CI,1.172-6.231), the ratio of mass size to body surface area (BSA) at discharge greater than 4.255 (OR, 1.369; 95% CI, 1.104-1.697), and without continuous oral antibiotic agents after discharge (OR, 3.111; 95% CI, 1.240-7. 802). Conclusions: Interval appendectomy is recommended for children with WBC count at discharge greater than 8 × 10⁹/L, and the ratio of mass size to BSA at discharge greater than 4.255, because they are more likely to develop recurrent appendiceal abscess after initial conservative treatment. The duration of intravenous antibiotic agents is an independent factor of the recurrence of appendiceal abscess, and a longer course of intravenous antibiotic agents is strongly associated with a reduced risk of recurrence. Continued oral antibiotic agents after discharge can effectively reduce the risk of recurrence of appendiceal abscesses.

Aiming for minimally invasive treatment of pediatric acute appendicitis in a district hospital

Background

Appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen. Although emergency surgery used to be the standard treatment for both simple and complex appendicitis, there are now options for interval surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and even non-surgical treatment. In this study, we aimed to establish better treatment strategies for pediatric acute appendicitis and to find out whether minimally invasive treatment is superior to the traditional open approach. We retrospectively reviewed the cases of acute appendicitis treated in our hospital during the period from 2013 to 2018. The patients who underwent appendectomy were divided into four groups. Group 1 underwent early appendectomy with open approach, group2 underwent interval appendectomy with open approach, group 3 underwent early appendectomy with laparoscopic approach, and group 4 underwent interval appendectomy with laparoscopic approach. In addition to the above groups, the non-surgical treatment group was also studied. Clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging results, operative time, morbidity, and length of hospital stay were reviewed.

Results

One hundred six children’s records were reviewed. Thirty-five of them were selected for non-surgery as they were cases with no fecal stone and first onset appendicitis, and 15 of these 35 patients (42.9%) relapsed after antibiotic treatment. As for the appendix diameter, the relapse group was significantly larger than the non-relapse group (p=0.007). In cases of surgery, group 4 had significantly less intraoperative blood loss than group 1 (p<0.001). Group 4 had significantly fewer postoperative complications than groups 1 and 2 [group 4 vs. group 1 (p=0.009), group 4 vs. group 2 (p=0.034)]. The postoperative hospital stay in groups 2 and 4 were significantly shorter than group 1 [group 1 vs. group 2 (p=0.015), group 1 vs. group 4 (p<0.001)]. On the contrary, group 1 had significantly shorter total hospital stay than groups 2 and 4 [group 1 vs. group 2 (p=0.029), group 1 vs. group 4 (p<0.001)].

Conclusion

Interval laparoscopic appendectomy and non-surgical treatment were safe and effective in children. From the viewpoint of avoiding unnecessary emergency surgery and prolonged hospitalization, we believe that interval laparoscopic appendectomy or non-surgical treatment should be performed after identifying patients who do not require surgery, paying attention to the risk factors for relapse.

Prognosis of ultrasonographic low-grade pediatric appendicitis treated with supportive care

BACKGROUND

A previous report proposed ultrasonography-based classification as a promising means of predicting pediatric spontaneously resolving appendicitis. The present study investigated the long-term prognosis of supportive care for low-grade appendicitis identified by ultrasonography, defined as an appendix with a smooth submucosal layer irrespective of blood flow or an appendix with an irregular layer and increased blood flow.

METHODS

The present, retrospective cohort study enrolled patients under 16 years of age with acute appendicitis at a children's hospital between October 2010 and September 2016. The inclusion criteria were ultrasonography findings showing an appendix with (1) full visualization, (2) a diameter ≥6 mm, (3) a smooth submucosal layer or an irregular layer with increased blood flow, and (4) no appendiceal mass, abscess, or perforation. The exclusion criteria were: (1) a history of acute appendicitis, (2) antibiotic administration within 72 hours before diagnosis, and (3) antibiotic administration or surgery before supportive care. The primary outcome was the event-free duration, defined as a period of supportive care alone with no additional intervention or recurrence of appendicitis.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-two patients were enrolled. The median Alvarado score was 7 (interquartile range, 6-8), and the median follow-up duration in event-free cases was 1,922 days (interquartile range, 1,347-2,614 days). The event-free rate was 75.0%, 67.0%, and 62.5%, at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The long-term, event-free rate exceeded 60% in patients with low-grade appendicitis defined by ultrasonography who received neither surgery nor antibiotic treatment. Most recurrences occurred within 2 years of the initial diagnosis.

Pathology findings following interval appendectomy: Should it stay or go?

PURPOSE

Interval appendectomy following nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical pathology and clinical outcomes after pediatric interval appendectomy.

METHODS

Pathology results from children with complicated appendicitis who underwent interval appendectomy at a single children's hospital from 2010 to 2017 were reviewed. The primary outcome was pathology results. Secondary outcomes included complications and readmission following initial treatment and after interval appendectomy.

RESULTS

Among 149 patients (median age 11 years; range, 1-18), all had evidence of persistent inflammation on surgical pathology, 25 (17%) had an appendicolith, and no neoplasms were identified. Median duration of the initial admission was 8 days (range, 2-28) and 70% received a percutaneous drain prior to appendectomy. Interval appendectomy was performed at a median of 7.5 weeks (range, 2.9-29.1). Thirty-six (24%) returned to the hospital prior to their scheduled appendectomy and 6 (4%) required appendectomy earlier than planned. Nine patients (6%) experienced a complication following interval appendectomy, of which superficial surgical site infection was the most common (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

All children had evidence of ongoing inflammation on surgical pathology. While the clinical implications of persistent inflammation remain uncertain, these findings suggest that interval appendectomy is an appropriate treatment following medical management of complicated appendicitis in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE SECTION

IV, Case series with no comparison groups.

Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis

Background

Uncomplicated appendicitis may resolve spontaneously or require treatment with antibiotics or appendicectomy. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the outcome of a non-antibiotic management strategy with that of antibiotic therapy in uncomplicated appendicitis.

Methods

Patients presenting to a university teaching hospital with CT-verified uncomplicated simple appendicitis (appendiceal diameter no larger than 11 mm and without any signs of perforation) were randomized to management with a no-antibiotic regimen with supportive care (intravenous fluids, analgesia and antipyretics as necessary) or a 4-day course of antibiotics with supportive care. The primary endpoint was rate of total treatment failure, defined as initial treatment failure within 1 month and recurrence of appendicitis during the follow-up period.

Results

Some 245 patients were randomized within the trial, and followed up for a median of 19 months. The duration of hospital stay was shorter (mean 3·1 versus 3·7 days; P &lt; 0·001) and the medical costs lower (€1181 versus 1348; P &lt; 0·001) among those randomized to therapy without antibiotics. There was no difference in total treatment failure rate between the groups: 29 of 124 (23·4 per cent) in the no-antibiotic group and 25 of 121 (20·7 per cent) in the antibiotic group (P = 0·609). Eighteen patients (9 in each group) had initial treatment failure, 15 of whom underwent appendicectomy and three received additional antibiotics. Thirty-six patients (20 in the no-antibiotic group, 16 in the antibiotic group) experienced recurrence, of whom 30 underwent appendicectomy and six received further antibiotics.

Conclusion

Treatment failure rates in patients presenting with CT-confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis appeared similar among those receiving supportive care with either a no-antibiotic regimen or a 4-day course of antibiotics. Registration number: KCT0000124 (http://cris.nih.go.kr).

C-reactive Protein may Predict the Recurrence of Appendicitis in Children Formerly with Appendiceal Mass after Successful Non-operative Treatment

BACKGROUND

This study identified factors associated with the recurrence of appendicitis in children with appendiceal masses after successful nonsurgical treatment.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, children who were diagnosed as having appendiceal masses after undergoing conservative treatment between 2000 and 2014 were enrolled and the medical records of those who did not undergo an interval appendectomy were reviewed. The clinical features and outcomes of patients with and those without recurrent appendicitis were compared. Regression analysis was used to identify risk factors of appendicitis recurrence.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included and successfully discharged after receiving nonsurgical treatment for appendiceal masses. Of the patients, 35 (50.0%) developed recurrent appendicitis and 85.7% (30/35) recurrences developed within 3 months. Multivariate analyses showed that patients with a higher serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level and peritonitis more frequently developed recurrence. The appendicitis recurrence rate was significantly higher in the patients with CRP levels of ≥103 mg/L with an odds ratio of 16.9 or in those with peritonitis with an odds ratio of 4.9.

CONCLUSION

Children with appendiceal masses who develop peritonitis or have CRP levels of ≥103 mg/L have a higher recurrence rate of appendicitis and should undergo an interval appendectomy.

Risk Factors for Prolonged Hospitalization in Pediatric Appendicitis Patients with Medical Treatment

BACKGROUND

With effective antibiotics against enteric flora and computed tomography-guided drainage for abscesses, the initial use of nonoperative therapy for children with appendicitis has increased both in recent reports and at our hospital. However, it has been reported that these patients have a relatively longer hospital stay and that their treatment is more expensive than those who undergo aggressive surgical intervention.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study based in a single medical center. A systemic chart review was conducted to identify risk factors for prolonged hospitalization in pediatric appendicitis patients not initially undergoing surgical treatment. Patient demographics, clinical symptoms, duration of symptoms, laboratory findings, imaging findings, complications, and length of hospital stay were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors of prolonged hospitalization (≥15 days) and readmission.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-five patients were recruited in this study, of whom 53 (42.4%) had prolonged hospitalization. The values of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly higher in patients with prolonged hospitalization compared with those without prolonged hospitalization (203 ± 108.6 mg/L vs. 140 ± 93.0 mg/L, p = 0.001). Risk factors of prolonged hospitalization were serum CRP >150 mg/L (35/53 vs. 28/72, p = 0.001), abscess formation (38/53 vs. 35/72, p = 0.008), and multiple abscesses (10/53 vs. 1/72, p = 0.001). Under multivariate analysis, CRP >150 mg/L (odds ratio=1.004, p = 0.0334) and multiple abscesses (odds ratio = 8.788, p = 0.044) were two independent predictors for prolonged hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Marked elevation of serum CRP (>150 mg/L) and multiple abscesses are two independent risk factors for prolonged hospitalization in children with appendicitis who are initially treated nonoperatively.

Therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage and factors for performing an interval appendectomy in pediatric appendiceal abscess

Background

In this study, we studied the therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics and the need for an interval appendectomy for treating appendiceal abscess in children with a research-oriented dataset released by the Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan through the Collaboration Center for Health Information Application (CCHIA).

Methods

We identified 1225 patients under 18 years of age who had non-surgical treatment for an appendiceal abscess between 2007 and 2012 in a Taiwan CCHIA dataset. The treatment included percutaneous drainage with antibiotics or antibiotics alone. We also analyzed data of patient’s baseline characteristics, outcomes of percutaneous drainage, and indicating factors for performing an interval appendectomy.

Results

Totally, 6190 children had an appendiceal abscess, an 1225 patients received non-operative treatment. Of 1225 patients, 150 patients received treatment with percutaneous drainage and antibiotics, 78 had recurrent appendicitis, 185 went on to receive an interval appendectomy, and 10 had postoperative complications after the interval appendectomy. We found that patients treated with percutaneous drainage and antibiotics had a significantly lower rate of recurrent appendicitis (p < 0.05), a significantly smaller chance of receiving an interval appendectomy (p < 0.05), and significantly fewer postoperative complications after the interval appendectomy (p < 0.05) than those without percutaneous drainage treatment. Older children (13 ~ 18 years) patients were found to have a significantly smaller need to receive an interval appendectomy than those who were ≤ 6 years of age (odd ratio (OR) = 2.071, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.34–3.19, p < 0.01), and those who were 7 ~ 12 years old (OR = 1.662, 95 % CI = 1.15–2.41, p < 0.01). In addition, those treated with percutaneous drainage were significantly less indicated to receive an interval appendectomy later (OR = 2.249, 95 % CI = 1.19 ~ 4.26, p < 0.05). In addition, those with recurrent appendicitis had a significantly increased incidence of receiving an interval appendectomy later (OR = 3.231, 95 % CI = 1.95 ~ 5.35, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this study, we used nationwide data to demonstrate therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage and antibiotics was more beneficial than only antibiotics in treating patients with an appendiceal abscess. We also found three factors that were significantly associated with receiving an interval appendectomy: recurrent appendicitis, being aged ≤ 13 years, and treatment with antibiotics only.

Role of non-operative management in pediatric appendicitis

Appendectomy is currently considered the standard of care for children with acute appendicitis. Although commonly performed and considered a safe procedure, appendectomy is not without complications. Non-operative management has a role in the treatment of both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. In uncomplicated appendicitis, initial non-operative management appears to be safe, with an approximate 1-year success rate of 75%. Compared to surgery, non-operative management is associated with less disability and lower costs, with no increase in the rate of complicated appendicitis. In patients with complicated appendicitis, initial non-operative management with interval appendectomy has been shown to be safe with reported success rates between 66% and 95%. Several studies suggest that initial non-operative management with interval appendectomy may be beneficial in patients with perforated appendicitis with a well-formed abscess or inflammatory mass. Recent data suggest that interval appendectomy may not be necessary after initial non-operative management of complicated appendicitis.

Association between prior appendectomy and/or tonsillectomy in women and subsequent pregnancy rate: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To study pregnancy rates after appendectomy and/or tonsillectomy.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study using the United Kingdom (U.K.) primary health care-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Female patients who underwent appendectomy, tonsillectomy, or both from 1987 to 2012 and appropriate comparators.

INTERVENTION(S)

Timed follow-up until first pregnancy after surgery. The association between prior surgery and subsequent pregnancy was determined with the use of Cox regression models.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy rate and time to first pregnancy after surgery.

RESULT(S)

The analyses included 54,675 appendectomy-only patients, 112,607 tonsillectomy-only patients, 10,340 patients who had both appendectomy and tonsillectomy, and 355,244 comparators matched for exact age and practice from the rest of female patients in the database. There were 29,732 (54.4%), 60,078 (53.4%), and 6,169 (59.7%) pregnancies in the appendectomy-only, tonsillectomy-only, and both appendectomy tonsillectomy cohorts, respectively versus 155,079 (43.7%) in the comparator cohort during a mean follow-up of 14.7 ± 9.7 years. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for subsequent birth rates were 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-1.35), 1.49 (95% CI 1.48-1.51), and 1.43 (95% CI 1.39-1.47), respectively. Time to pregnancy was shortest after both appendectomy and tonsillectomy followed by appendectomy only and then tonsillectomy only compared with the rest of the population.

CONCLUSION(S)

Appendectomy and/or tonsillectomy was associated with increased subsequent pregnancy rates and shorter time to pregnancy. The effect of the surgical procedures on the pregnancy outcome was cumulative.

Drainage of periappendiceal abscess and removal of free fecalith--extraperitoneal approach

Treatment of complicated acute appendicitis is controversial. The dilemma is further complicated by presence of free fecalith in a well-circumscribed abscess, which has been repeatedly demonstrated to be a major predicting factor of treatment failure of nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis complicated with appendiceal abscess. If left behind after drainage of the abscess, further operations for removal of retained fecalith or recurrence of abscess might be required. However, little had been stressed over the significance of removal of the free fecalith when it was first encountered. We report our experience of drainage of appendiceal abscess and removal of free fecalith by taking an extraperitoneal approach. Both of our cases made a smooth recovery without any complication or recurrence after a 2-year follow-up. Treatment with this approach avoids many of the complications associated with formal laparotomy. Unlike image-guided drainage or laparoscopic drainage, this procedure is relatively simple and straightforward and can be performed in any level of hospital, including private practitioners and in less well-developed areas and countries. With proper case selection, we recommend this approach as one of the alternatives in the treatment of late-presenting appendiceal abscess with free fecalith.

Predictors of recurrent appendicitis after non-operative management of children with perforated appendicitis presenting with an appendicular inflammatory mass

AIM

To determine clinical and imaging predictors of recurrent appendicitis after non-operative management for children with perforated appendicitis presenting with an appendicular inflammatory mass.

METHODS

A case-control study was carried out of children with clinical and ultrasonographic diagnosis of an appendicular inflammatory mass. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or not of recurrent appendicitis (or predisposing pathological findings during interval appendectomy). Several clinical and imaging factors were compared between both groups using an independent and progressive analysis to identify which were the most relevant predictors.

RESULTS

The persistence of symptoms after resolution of the appendicular inflammatory mass, as well as its time of resolution (p<0.001), were the most relevant factors during group classification. The identification of an ultrasonographic image of an appendicolith and the initial size of the mass were also identified as independent predictors (p<0.018 and p<0.01). The presence of the first two factors in a patient was strongly associated with recurrent appendicitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent symptoms after the recovery of the initial episode, associated with a slow resolution of the appendicular inflammatory mass, are indications for an interval appendectomy. A previous history of appendicitis or detection of an ultrasonographic image of an appendicolith is the other indication for an interval appendectomy.

Nonoperative management of appendiceal phlegmon or abscess with an appendicolith in children

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of appendiceal phlegmon or abscess with an appendicolith is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes and prognosis of nonoperative management of appendiceal phlegmon or abscess with an appendicolith in children.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2011, 105 children with appendiceal phlegmon or abscess who were treated nonoperatively without interval appendectomy were reviewed. Average follow-up of subjects was 2.4 years. Data were compared between subjects with and without an appendicolith or persistent presence and disappearance of an appendicolith.

RESULTS

The success rate for nonoperative therapy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess with appendicolith was 95.9 %. The risk of recurrent appendicitis in appendiceal phlegmon or abscess with appendicolith (19.1 %) was higher than that without appendicolith (8.9 %, P = 0.132). The rate of appendicolith disappearance during follow-up was 80.9 %. The persistent presence of an appendicolith was associated with a significantly higher recurrence rate (66.7 %) compared with appendicolith disappearance (7.9 %, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Appendiceal phlegmon or abscess with an appendicolith can be managed nonoperatively, and most appendicoliths can be resolved. Persistent presence of an appendicolith is a significant risk factor for recurrent appendicitis. Interval appendectomy is recommended for persistent presence of appendicolith, but is not indicated in cases without appendicolith or appendicolith disappearance.

Appendicolith delays resolution of appendicitis following nonoperative management

INTRODUCTION

Success in nonoperative management is only based on the clinical symptoms of patients with acute appendicitis. However, imaging studies can provide further insight into the status of the appendix to monitor treatment response if immediate appendectomy is not undertaken. This study investigates sonographic resolution following nonoperative management and assesses the feasibility of incorporating ultrasound into patient care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with acute appendicitis who had been successfully treated with nonoperative management were enrolled and received repeat sonographic examinations using 3-day intervals until sonographic resolution. The relationship between the time to achieve sonographic resolution and clinical parameters was identified using negative binomial regression models.

RESULTS

From January 2003 to December 2009, 128 patients were successfully treated with nonoperative management. Eighty patients completed sonographic examinations until achieving resolution. Sonographic resolution was achieved on 17 ± 12 days (range, 3-69 days). Ninety-five percent of the patients achieved sonographic resolution within 41 days. The appendicolith was positively related to the time to achieve sonographic resolution (rate ratios, 1.63; 95 % confidence intervals, 1.06-2.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound can be used to evaluate the condition of the appendix to monitor treatment response following nonoperative management on the sixth week. An appendicolith delays sonographic resolution of appendicitis.

Interval routine appendectomy following conservative treatment of acute appendicitis: Is it really needed

Conservative management of acute appendicitis (AA) is gradually being adopted as a valuable therapeutic choice in the treatment of selected patients with AA. This approach is based on the results of many recent studies indicating that it is a valuable and effective alternative to routine emergency appendectomy. Existing data do not support routine interval appendectomy following successful conservative management of AA; indeed, the risk of recurrence is low. Moreover, recurrences usually exhibit a milder clinical course compared to the first episode of AA. The role of routine interval appendectomy is also questioned recently, even in patients with AA complicated by plastron or localized abscess formation. Surgical judgment is required to avoid misdiagnosis when selecting a conservative approach in patients with a presumed “appendiceal” mass.

Efficacy of Short-Term Antibiotic Therapy for Consecutive Patients with Mild Appendicitis

Although antibiotic therapy seemed to be a safe treatment option for acute appendicitis, indications of this treatment have not been fully evaluated. We hypothesized that clinical and radiologic mild appendicitis may be a candidate for short-term antibiotic therapy. The purpose of present study was to examine the efficacy and the recurrence rate of short-term antibiotic therapy for consecutive patients with mild appendicitis. A prospective observational study was conducted over 3 years. The mild appendicitis was defined as the intermediate Alvarado score (4-8) and dilated appendix from 6 mm to 10 mm in radiologic study. All patients received initial antibiotics administration with clinical observation during 48 hours. The failure to respond to therapy and the incidence of recurrence were assessed. There were 107 enrolled patients with the mean Alvarado score of 6 ± 1 and the mean appendiceal diameter of 7.4 ± 1 mm. Of these, 97 (91%) exhibited improved symptoms and were discharged. The remaining 10 patients underwent surgery because of clinical aggravation, and pathology revealed true appendicitis in six of them. Of the 97 patients in whom the initial treatment was successful, five patients (5%) exhibited recurrent symptoms during a median follow-up period of 18 months. Of these five patients, three were treated with surgery (all true appendicitis), and the remaining two were once again treated with antibiotics. Patients with suspected appendicitis, those in whom mild appendicitis was diagnosed after clinical and radiologic evaluations, were found to benefit from short-term antibiotic therapy.

Dollars and sense of interval appendectomy in children: a cost analysis

PURPOSE

Although initial nonoperative management of focal, perforated appendicitis in children is increasingly practiced, the need for subsequent interval appendectomy remains debated. We hypothesized that cost comparison would favor continued nonoperative management over routine interval appendectomy.

METHODS

Decision tree analysis was used to compare continued nonoperative management with routine interval appendectomy after initial success with nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis. Outcome probabilities were obtained from literature review and cost estimates from the Kid's Inpatient Database. Sensitivity analyses were performed on the 2 most influential variables in the model, the probability of successful nonoperative management and the costs associated with successful observation. Monte Carlo simulation was performed using the range of cost estimates.

RESULTS

Costs for continued nonoperative observation were estimated at $3080.78 as compared to $5034.58 for the interval appendectomy. Sensitivity analysis confirms a cost savings for nonoperative management as long as the likelihood of successful observation exceeds 60%. As the cost of nonoperative management increased, the required probability for its success also increased. Using wide distributions for both probability estimates as well as costs, Monte Carlo simulation favored continued observation in 75% of scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Continued nonoperative management has a cost advantage over routine interval appendectomy after initial success with conservative management in children with focal, perforated appendicitis.

Predictive factors for negative outcomes in initial non-operative management of suspected appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis has been reported to be managed with non-operative therapy at relatively high successful rate. However, risk factors for negative outcome have not been established.

METHOD

Three hundred eighty consecutive patients who underwent initial therapy for suspected appendicitis were reviewed. They were divided into three groups: operation group, the group successfully managed with non-operative therapy (success group), and the group required surgical conversion (failure group). Preoperative clinical data were compared among the groups and risk factors for negative outcomes were investigated.

RESULT

Thirteen patients were excluded due to contraindication for non-operative therapy. Of the remaining 367 patients, 143 patients (39.0%) were primarily treated with surgery, and 224 patients (61.0%) were initially managed with antibiotics. Among the 224 patients, 91 patients (40.6%) were refractory to antibiotics and converted to surgery after more than 24 h usage of antibiotics. Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level (>4 mg/dL) and presence of appendicolith were significant risk factors for conversion. Morbidity rate showed no significant difference between the operative and failure groups.

CONCLUSION

Elevated CRP concentration and appendicolith may predict the negative outcome in non-operative management. However, immediate appendectomy can possibly be avoided at least 24 h without increasing morbidity under the usage of antibiotics.

Ultrasonic diagnosis of acute appendicitis with atypical clinical manifestations

AIM: To explore the value of high and low frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with atypical clinical manifestations.

METHODS: A total of 65 acute appendicitis patients with atypical clinical symptoms and signs but confirmed by surgery and pathology were examined and diagnosed by high frequency (7.0-10.0 MHz) associated with low frequency (3.5-4.0 MHz) ultrasound. Their ultrasonic images of acute appendicitis were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS: Fifty-four (83.08%) patients were diagnosed by ultrasound. The rates of diagnosis by high frequency and low frequency ultrasound were significantly different (83.08% vs 61.53%, χ² = 4.32, P < 0.05). Some indirect evidences were achieved by ultrasonography: appendiceal fecalith was observed in 33 (61.11%) patients, local adynamic ileus in 25 (46.29%) patients, periappendicular fluid in 21 (38.88%) patients and complex mass in 14 (25.92%) patients. Mesenteric lymphadenectasis was found in 10 (18.52%) patients.

CONCLUSION: In most cases, the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis with atypical clinical manifestations can be made by high frequency associated with low frequency ultrasound.

Can interval appendectomy be justified following conservative treatment of perforated acute appendicitis?

BACKGROUND

There continues to be controversy about the necessity of interval appendectomy for delayed presentation of acute appendicitis. While recent studies suggest that the risk of recurrent disease is small, the risk of interval appendectomy is also small and does provide histologic identification and usually definitive treatment of the right lower quadrant inflammatory process.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of medical records gathered from 2002 to 2007 at a major teaching hospital of 986 adult patients over the age of 13 with appendicitis were analyzed. Forty-six patients (5%) were found to have right lower quadrant abscess or phlegmon, and were managed with intravenous antibiotics. Some patients also underwent percutaneous drainage. These patients were then readmitted 6 to 26 wk later for an elective laparoscopic interval appendectomy.

RESULTS

There were 19 males and 27 females with an average age of 43 y. Ninety-four percent of the appendectomies were completed laparoscopically; 16% of patients were found to have a normal or obliterated appendix on pathologic evaluation and likely did not benefit from interval appendectomy. On the other hand, 84% of patients had persistent acute appendicitis, chronic appendicitis, evidence of inflammatory bowel disease, or neoplasm identified, and likely benefited from surgical appendectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interval appendectomy provides diagnostic and therapeutic benefit to patients who present with a right lower quadrant abdominal inflammatory focus, and should be carefully considered in all adult patients.

Antibiotic Therapy and Interval Appendectomy for Perforated Appendicitis in Children: A Selective Approach

The role of initial nonoperative treatment in pediatric perforated appendicitis remains controversial. We examined our outcomes after using this approach in a selective manner. Children with perforated appendicitis treated during a 28-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Antibiotics and delayed appendectomy were used if there were more than 3 days of symptoms, absence of bowel obstruction, absence of diffuse peritonitis, and an appendiceal mass. Of 221 patients with perforated appendicitis, 32 (14%) were treated with this approach. Average age was 7.4 ± 4.2 years. Twenty-eight patients (88%) were successfully managed and 26 (81%) underwent appendectomy 8.6 ± 4.2 weeks after first presentation. Two patients did not respond completely, and underwent appendectomy during the same admission. Two patients initially responded, but had recurrent symptoms necessitating earlier appendectomy. There were no complications. Average total hospital stay was 7.2 ± 3.0 days. Initial nonoperative treatment is highly successful in selected children who meet specific criteria. Failure is not associated with increased morbidity.

Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis in children: can CT predict outcome?

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of perforated appendicitis remains controversial, but there is a trend toward nonoperative management. CT scanning might be helpful in determining which patients could benefit from this treatment option.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the value of CT imaging in predicting clinical success or failure in children with nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Admission CT scans of 34 children with perforated appendicitis treated nonoperatively between January 2003 and June 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. All children were given intravenous antibiotics. Clinical outcome was correlated with imaging findings including the maximal area, number and complexity of collections, presence of an appendicolith or extraluminal air, and extent of intra-abdominal disease outside the right lower quadrant. Patients with an accessible simple collection were drained if their clinical condition did not improve.

RESULTS

Successful nonoperative management was achieved in 20 patients; 14 patients failed nonoperative therapy. The presence of collections in three or more sectors (defined as the pelvis and four abdominal quadrants) correlated strongly with clinical failure (P < 0.05), while there was no correlation found between clinical outcome and the presence of an appendicolith, extraluminal air, distant ascites, and collection size or complexity.

CONCLUSION

In the nonoperative management of children with perforated appendicitis, admission CT findings demonstrating disease beyond the right lower quadrant correlate with treatment failure.